Reevaluation of the Cottbus Reinfarction Study with 30 mg aspirin per day 4 years after the end of the study

Four to 6 years after the end of the Cottbus Reinfarction Study with 30, 60 and 1000 mg/day aspirin, the survivors (72% of the patients) were reevaluated under standardized conditions at the district hospital. Nearly all patients (82%) of the former 30 mg group took further on 30 mg aspirin daily whereas of the former 1000 mg group only 20% continued to take doses higher than 500 mg aspirin. Forty-five percent changed to very low doses. Whereas the death rate was nearly the same in all three former dosage groups the total reinfarction rate was higher (22.5%) in the previous 1000 mg group in comparison to the 30 mg group (17.4%, p less than 0.05). The non-fatal reinfarction rate was by 50% lower in the former 30 mg group compared with the previous 1000 mg group. In the age group 50-59 a 8.6% non-fatal reinfarction rate is contrasted to 1.7% reinfarctions in patients of the former 30 mg group (p less than 0.01). The risk factors were not significantly different in the three groups.     

Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients

ObjectiveTo determine the effects of antiplatelet therapy among patients at high risk of occlusive vascular events.DesignCollaborative meta-analyses (systematic overviews).ResultsOverall, among these high risk patients, allocation to antiplatelet therapy reduced the combined outcome of any serious vascular event by about one quarter; non-fatal myocardial infarction was reduced by one third, non-fatal stroke by one quarter, and vascular mortality by one sixth (with no apparent adverse effect on other deaths). Absolute reductions in the risk of having a serious vascular event were 36 (SE 5) per 1000 treated for two years among patients with previous myocardial infarction; 38 (5) per 1000 patients treated for one month among patients with acute myocardial infarction; 36 (6) per 1000 treated for two years among those with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack; 9 (3) per 1000 treated for three weeks among those with acute stroke; and 22 (3) per 1000 treated for two years among other high risk patients (with separately significant results for those with stable angina (P=0.0005), peripheral arterial disease (P=0.004), and atrial fibrillation (P=0.01)). In each of these high risk categories, the absolute benefits substantially outweighed the absolute risks of major extracranial bleeding. Aspirin was the most widely studied antiplatelet drug, with doses of 75-150 mg daily at least as effective as higher daily doses. The effects of doses lower than 75 mg daily were less certain. Clopidogrel reduced serious vascular events by 10% (4%) compared with aspirin, which was similar to the 12% (7%) reduction observed with its analogue ticlopidine. Addition of dipyridamole to aspirin produced no significant further reduction in vascular events compared with aspirin alone. Among patients at high risk of immediate coronary occlusion, short term addition of an intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist to aspirin prevented a further 20 (4) vascular events per 1000 (P<0.0001) but caused 23 major (but rarely fatal) extracranial bleeds per 1000.ConclusionsAspirin (or another oral antiplatelet drug) is protective in most types of patient at increased risk of occlusive vascular events, including those with an acute myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke, unstable or stable angina, previous myocardial infarction, stroke or cerebral ischaemia, peripheral arterial disease, or atrial fibrillation. Low dose aspirin (75-150 mg daily) is an effective antiplatelet regimen for long term use, but in acute settings an initial loading dose of at least 150 mg aspirin may be required. Adding a second antiplatelet drug to aspirin may produce additional benefits in some clinical circumstances, but more research into this strategy is needed.

What is already known on this topic

Antiplatelet therapy is effective for short term treatment of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction and unstable anginaLong term treatment is beneficial for patients who have had a myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischaemic attackDaily aspirin doses of 75-325 mg are effective

What this study adds

Antiplatelet therapy protects against vascular events among patients with stable angina, intermittent claudication, and (if oral anticoagulants are unsuitable) atrial fibrillationAntiplatelet therapy can be started promptly during acute presumed ischaemic stroke and continued long termDaily aspirin doses of 75-150 mg seem to be as effective as higher doses for long term treatments (and clopidrogel is an appropriate alternative for patients with a contraindication to aspirin)Short term addition of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist to aspirin prevents vascular events in patients having percutaneous coronary intervention and those with unstable angina but causes increased bleeding     

Clinical effects of anticoagulant therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: systematic overview of randomised trials.

OBJECTIVES: Most randomised trials of anticoagulant therapy for suspected acute myocardial infarction have been small and, in some, aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy were not used routinely. A systematic overview (meta-analysis) of their results is needed, in particular to assess the clinical effects of adding heparin to aspirin. DESIGN: Computer aided searches, scrutiny of reference lists, and inquiry of investigators and companies were used to identify potentially eligible studies. On central review, 26 studies were found to involve unconfounded randomised comparisons of anticoagulant therapy versus control in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Additional information on study design and outcome was sought by correspondence with study investigators. SUBJECTS: Patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. INTERVENTIONS: No routine aspirin was used among about 5000 patients in 21 trials (including half of one small trial) that assessed heparin alone or heparin plus oral anticoagulants, and aspirin was used routinely among 68,000 patients in six trials (including the other half of one small trial) that assessed the addition of intravenous or high dose subcutaneous heparin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Death, reinfarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and major bleeds (average follow up of about 10 days). RESULTS: In the absence of aspirin, anticoagulant therapy reduced mortality by 25% (SD 8%; 95% confidence interval 10% to 38%; 2P = 0.002), representing 35 (11) fewer deaths per 1000. There were also 10 (4) fewer strokes per 1000 (2P = 0.01), 19 (5) fewer pulmonary emboli per 1000 (2P < 0.001), and non-significantly fewer reinfarctions, with about 13 (5) extra major bleeds per 1000 (2P = 0.01). Similar sized effects were seen with the different anticoagulant regimens studied. In the presence of aspirin, however, heparin reduced mortality by only 6% (SD 3%; 0% to 10%; 2P = 0.03), representing just 5 (2) fewer deaths per 1000. There were 3 (1.3) fewer reinfarctions per 1000 (2P = 0.04) and 1 (0.5) fewer pulmonary emboli per 1000 (2P = 0.01), but there was a small non-significant excess of stroke and a definite excess of 3 (1) major bleeds per 1000 (2P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical evidence from randomised trials dose not justify the routine addition of either intravenous or subcutaneous heparin to aspirin in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (irrespective of whether any type of fibrinolytic therapy is used).     

A comparison of aspirin and anticoagulation following thrombolysis for myocardial infarction (the AFTER study): a multicentre unblinded randomised clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare aspirin with anticoagulation with regard to risk of cardiac death and reinfarction in patients who received anistreplase thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. DESIGN: A multicentre unblinded randomised clinical trial. SETTING: 38 hospitals in six countries. SUBJECTS: 1036 patients who had been treated with anistreplase for myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to either aspirin (150 mg daily) or anticoagulation (intravenous heparin followed by warfarin or other oral anticoagulant). The trial was stopped earlier than originally intended because of the slowing rate of recruitment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cardiac death or recurrent myocardial infarction at 30 days. RESULTS: After 30 days cardiac death or reinfarction, occurred in 11.0% (57/517) of the patients treated with anticoagulation and 11.2% (58/519) of the patients treated with aspirin (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.50, P = 0.92). Corresponding findings at three months were 13.2% (68/517) and 12.1% (63/519) (0.91, 0.63 to 1.32, P = 0.67). Patients receiving anticoagulation were more likely than patients receiving aspirin to have had severe bleeding or a stroke by three months (3.9% v 1.7% (0.44, 0.20 to 0.97, P = 0.04)). CONCLUSION: No evidence of a difference in the incidence of cardiac events was found between the two treatment groups, though the trial is too small to claim treatment equivalence confidently. A higher incidence of severe bleeding events and strokes was detected in the group receiving anticoagulation, suggesting that aspirin may be the drug of choice for most patients in this context.     

Randomised trial of prophylactic daily aspirin in British male doctors

A six year randomised trial was conducted among 5139 apparently healthy male doctors to see whether 500 mg aspirin daily would reduce the incidence of and mortality from stroke, myocardial infarction, or other vascular conditions. Though total mortality was 10% lower in the treated than control group, this difference was not statistically significant and chiefly involved diseases other than stroke or myocardial infarction. Likewise, there was no significant difference in the incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke—indeed, disabling strokes were somewhat commoner among those allocated aspirin. The lower confidence limit for the effect of aspirin on non-fatal stroke or myocardial infarction, however, was a substantial 25% reduction. Migraine and certain types of musculoskeletal pain were reported significantly less often in the treated than control group, but as the control group was not given a placebo the relevance of these findings was difficult to assess. There was no apparent reduction in the incidence of cataract in the treated group.The lack of any apparent reduction in disabling stroke or vascular death contrasts with the established value of antiplatelet treatment after occlusive vascular disease.     

ISIS-2: 10 year survival among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in randomised comparison of intravenous streptokinase,oral aspirin,both, or neither

Objective: To assess effects of intravenous streptokinase, one month of oral aspirin, or both, on long term survival after suspected acute myocardial infarction. Design: Randomised, “2×2 factorial,” placebo controlled trial. Setting: 417 hospitals in 16 countries. Subjects: 17 187 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction randomised between March 1985 and December 1987. Follow up of vital status complete to at least 1 January 1990 for 95% of all patients and to mid-1997 for the 6213 patients in United Kingdom. Interventions: Intravenous streptokinase (1.5 MU in 1 hour) and oral aspirin (162 mg daily for 1 month) versus matching placebos. Main outcome measures: Mortality from all causes during up to 10 years’ follow up, with subgroup analyses based on 4 year follow up. Results: After randomisation, 1841 deaths were recorded in days 0-35, 991 from day 36 to end of year 1, 1478 in years 2-4, and 1230 in years 5-10. Allocation to streptokinase was associated with 29 (95% confidence interval 20 to 38) fewer deaths per 1000 patients during days 0-35. This early benefit persisted (death rate ratio 0.98 (0.92 to 1.04) for additional deaths between day 36 and end of year 10), so that there were 28 (14 to 42) and 23 (2 to 44) fewer deaths per 1000 patients treated with streptokinase after 4 years and 10 years respectively. There was no evidence that absolute survival benefit increased with prolonged follow up among any category of patient, including those presenting early after symptoms started or with anterior ST elevation. Nor did the early benefits seem to be lost in any category (including those aged over 70). Allocation to one month of aspirin was associated with 26 (16 to 35) fewer deaths per 1000 during first 35 days, with little further benefit or loss during subsequent years (death rate ratio 0.99 (0.93 to 1.06) between day 36 and end of year 10). The early benefit obtained with combination of streptokinase and one month of aspirin also seemed to persist long term. Conclusions: The early survival advantages produced by fibrinolytic therapy and one month of aspirin started in acute myocardial infarction seem to be maintained for at least 10 years.

Key messages

• Large randomised trials have shown that the survival benefits of intravenous fibrinolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction persist for at least one year, but there is relatively little information about longer term effects
• By contrast, this report from the ISIS-2 trial of intravenous streptokinase and of one month of oral aspirin includes nearly 4000 deaths between the start of year 2 and the end of year 10
• The early survival benefits of fibrinolytic therapy persist for at least 10 years after treatment and do not seem to increase or decrease with prolonged follow up in any category of patients, including elderly subjects
• The survival benefits of short term aspirin treatment in acute myocardial infarction also persist long term and are additional to those of fibrinolytic therapy, and other studies show that these benefits can be increased by continuing aspirin treatment for some years after myocardial infarction

     

Aspirin use and chronic diseases: a cohort study of the elderly.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the associations between the use of aspirin and the incidences of cardiovascular diseases, cancers, and other chronic diseases. DESIGN--Postal questionnaire survey to elicit details of aspirin use. SETTING--Californian retirement community. SUBJECTS--All 22,781 residents of the community (white, affluent, and well educated) were sent a questionnaire that included questions on medical history and the use of drugs such as analgesics, laxatives, and vitamin supplements. In all 61% responded (13,987, 8881 women and 5106 men; median age 73). They formed the cohort that was followed up for 6 1/2 years using discharge summaries from three hospitals serving the area and death certificates from the health department. Only 13 respondents were lost to follow up but seemed not to have died. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Incidences of cardiovascular diseases, cancers, gastrointestinal bleeding, ulcers, and cataracts were compared in participants who did and did not take aspirin daily. RESULTS--Age adjusted incidences were computed with an internal standard and five age groups. By 1 January 1988 there had been 25 incident cases of kidney cancer among all participants; 341 incident cases of stroke, 253 of acute myocardial infarction, 220 of ischaemic heart disease, and 317 of other heart disease were reported among respondents without a reported history of angina, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The incidence of kidney cancer was raised among those who took aspirin daily compared with those who did not take it, although the increase was significant only in men (relative risks = 6.3, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 17, for men and 2.1, 0.53 to 8.5, for women). Those who took aspirin daily showed no increased risk of any other cancer, except colon cancer for both sexes combined (relative risk = 1.5, 1.1 to 2.2). The risk of acute myocardial infarction was reduced slightly among regular users of aspirin in men but not women. The risk of ischaemic heart disease was almost doubled in those who took aspirin daily compared with non-users (relative risks = 1.9, 1.1 to 3.1, for men and 1.7, 1.1 to 2.7, for women). Small, non-significant increased risks of stroke were observed in both sexes. CONCLUSION--The daily use of aspirin increased the risk of kidney cancer and ischaemic heart disease.     

小剂量重组组织纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性心肌梗死临床研究概况

1990年代中期以来,国内130多家医院入组9378例急性心肌梗死患者,其中用小剂量（50mg）重组组织纤溶酶厚激活剂（rt-PA）治疗6693例,阻塞相关血管开通5318俐,开通率为79.46％;死亡293倒,病死率为4.38％;出血550俐,出血率勾8.22％,其中重度出血7例,颅内出血21例（0.31％）,再次梗塞60例（0.90％）。超过40家医院对rt-PA（50mg）与尿激酶治疗急性心肌梗死疗效进行了比较,共计入组3449倒急性心肌梗死患者,rt-PA治疗1689例,先静脉推注8mg,其余42mg在30或60和90min滴注;尿激酶治疗1760例,150万U位滴注30min。结果显示,阻塞相关冠脉血管开通率分别为79.40％（1341例）和5733％（1009例）,相差非常显著（P〈0.001）。12家医院研究了rt-PA50-9100mg治疗急性心肌梗死的效果,共计入组1054例患者,其中50mg组487例,100mg组567例,阻塞相关血管开通率分别为78.85％和82.36％。另有22家医院入组1017倒病人,行rt-PA50mg30rain给药临味试验,冠脉开通率达80.53％;18家医院行rt-PA50mg 60min给药临床试验,入组942例病人,阻塞相关血管开通率为77.92％;50家医院用rt-PA50mg 90min给药方案治疗急性心肌梗死患者,入组2768例患者,冠脉开通率为77.89％。6家医院对用rt-PA（50mg）与链激酶治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效进行了对比,结果表明相关血管开通率分别为81.4％和65.2％22家医院比较了小剂量rt-PA对急性心肌梗死患者症状发作不同时间的治疗效果,表明症状发作时间越短,用药的溶栓效果越好。刘光对入院前和入院后用小剂量rt-PA溶栓进行了比较研究,证明入院前溶栓比入院后效果好。对冠脉内输注rt-PA（50mg）和2次静脉推注小剂量rt-PA治疗急性心肌梗死的效果也进行了探索。     

不同剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的临床研究

目的:观察标准治疗基础上联合不同剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的疗效及安全性。方法:2004年9月至2008年3月就诊我院的124例12小时以内发病的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者,随机分为3组,3组均在入院后前3天给予阿司匹林300mg/d,此后给予阿司匹林100mg/d,A组常规不给予氯吡格雷治疗,B组给予氯吡格雷75mg/d,C组入院即刻给予氯吡格雷300mg,继之75 mg/d治疗,随访30天。观察溶栓血管再通率、梗死后心绞痛发作、心力衰竭事件及死亡、再发心肌梗死、或脑卒中的联合终点。结果:与A组相比,B组、C组患者溶栓成功率提高、梗死后心绞痛发作减少。P<0.05:进一步分析发现C组与B组差异无统计学意义,P>0.05。三组均无主要和次要出血事件发生,轻微出血发生率无统计学差异,P<0.05。结论:ST段抬高的急性心肌梗死患者在标准治疗的基础上早期加用氯吡格雷75 mg/d或先予300 mg负荷量,继之75 mg/d口服,均可提高溶栓成功率,降低梗死后心绞痛发生,而氯吡格雷负荷剂量组并不优于普通剂量组,且两组安全耐受性好。     

United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: interim results

From 1979 to 1985, 2435 patients thought to have had a transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke were allocated at random to receive long term blind treatment with either aspirin 600 mg twice daily (n=815), aspirin 300 mg once daily (806), or placebo (814). Treatment continued with about 85% compliance until September 1986 (mean four years). The odds of suffering one or more of four categories of event—namely, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal major stroke, vascular death, or non-vascular death—were 18% less in the two groups allocated to receive aspirin than in the group allocated to receive placebo (2p=0·01). The more relevant but less frequent composite event of disabling stroke or vascular death was reduced by only 7%; this reduction was not significantly different from zero, but nor was it significantly different from a 25% reduction. There was no definite difference between responses to the 300 mg and 1200 mg daily doses, except that the lower dose was significantly less gastrotoxic.     

Evaluation of anti-emetic action of domperidone in patients treated with cytostatics]

Domperidone was administered to 40 patients with various neoplastic syndromes to prevent nausea and vomiting observed during previous courses of chemotherapy. It was found, that daily dose of 30 mg completely prevents nausea and vomiting in 30% of patients and significantly lowers such symptoms in further 58% of patients. An increase in a daily dose of 60 mg abolishes nausea and vomiting in 60%, and decrease their intensity in 35% of patients. Domperidone was administered orally during the whole period of chemotherapy without any adverse reactions related to its anti-dopamine actions.     

Diminished platelet residence time on active human atherosclerotic lesions in-vivo--evidence for an optimal dose of aspirin?

Although aspirin is an old drug, its optimal dose for the treatment of human atherosclerosis has not been finally proven. Various in-vitro and ex-vivo platelet function tests revealed a dose range from 1 to 3000 mg as being optimal. It was thus the goal to examine its in-vivo efficacy in human suffering from peripheral vascular disease in 7 different doses ranging from 1 mg to 1000 mg a day. All these patients have been treated for 3 months. Platelet half-life and platelet uptake ratio show an in part significant improvement being most pronounced at the daily doses of 20 and 1000 mg respectively. No change occurs in the placebo treated controls. These findings indicate, that 20 or 1000 mg aspirin taken daily per os, are superior to the other doses examined concerning the in-vivo platelet function (as measured by platelet half-life) and rendering the arterial surface less thrombogenic (as reflected by platelet uptake ratio-measurements).     

负荷剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死

目的:观察标准治疗基础上联合负荷剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的疗效及安全性。方法:106例12小时以内发病的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者随机分为2组,2组均在入院后前3天给予阿司匹林300 mg.d~(-1),此后给予阿司匹林100 mg.d~(-1),A组不给予氯吡格雷治疗,B组入院即刻给予氯吡格雷300 mg,继之75 mg.d~(-1)治疗,平均随访30天。观察溶栓血管再通率、梗死后心绞痛发作、心力衰竭事件及死亡、再发心肌梗死或脑卒中的联合终点。结果:与A组相比,B组患者溶栓血管再通率显著提高、梗死后心绞痛发作明显减少;而在心力衰竭事件及死亡、再发心肌梗死、或脑卒中的联合终点的比较上差异无显著性意义。2组均无主要和次要出血事件发生,轻微出血发生率无统计学差异。结论:急性ST段抬高的急性心肌梗死患者,不论是否接受择期的冠脉介入治疗(PCI),在标准治疗的基础上早期加用氯吡格雷300mg负荷量,继之75 mg.d~(-1)口服,可显著提高溶栓成功率、降低梗死后心绞痛发作,且安全耐受性好。     

Secondary prevention of vascular disease by prolonged antiplatelet treatment

Thirty one randomised trials of antiplatelet treatment for patients with a history of transient ischaemic attack, occlusive stroke, unstable angina, or myocardial infarction were identified. Six were still in progress, and the results of the remaining 25 were reviewed. They included a total of some 29 000 patients, 3000 of whom had died. Overall, allocation to antiplatelet treatment had no apparent effect on non-vascular mortality but reduced vascular mortality by 15% (SD 4%) and non-fatal vascular events (stroke or myocardial infarction) by 30% (4%). This suggested that with good compliance these treatments might reduce vascular mortality by about one sixth, other vascular events by about a third, and total vascular events by about a quarter. There was no significant difference between the effects of the different types of antiplatelet treatment tested (300-325 mg aspirin daily, higher aspirin doses, sulphinpyrazone, or high dose aspirin with dipyridamole), nor between the effects in patients with histories of cerebral or cardiac disease. Thus antiplatelet treatment can reduce the incidence of serious vascular events by about a quarter among a wide range of patients at particular risk of occlusive vascular disease. The balance of risk and benefit, however, might be different for “primary” prevention among people at low absolute risk of occlusive disease if antiplatelet treatment produced even a small increase in the incidence of cerebral haemorrhage.     

阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷治疗伴有血管狭窄的脑梗死的临床观察

目的:探讨阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷治疗伴有颅内外血管狭窄的脑梗死患者血同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)、血尿酸(UA)、血流动力学及临床效果。方法:选取60例因脑梗死且伴有颅内外血管狭窄的在我院住院治疗的患者,随机分为对照组和实验组。常规治疗基础上,对照组予以阿司匹林100 mg·d-1口服,实验组于对照组基础上加氯吡格雷75 mg·d-1口服,共21 d。比较两组患者血Hcy、UA、血小板(PLT)、血流动力学水平及NIHSS评分。结果:患者在接受治疗后,Hcy、UA及血小板水平均降低,与对照组比较,实验组Hcy、UA及血小板水平较低,P0.05;实验组治疗后NIHSS评分明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷治疗伴有血管狭窄的脑梗死效果优于单用阿司匹林,对临床具有指导意义。     

丁苯酞对脑梗死模型大鼠血清及脑组织突触素及突触后致密物-95表达的影响

摘要 目的：探讨丁苯酞对脑梗死模型大鼠血清及脑组织突触素及突触后致密物（postsynaptic density,PSD）-95表达的影响。方法：将建模成功的大鼠随机平分为三组-丁苯酞组、阿司匹林组与模型组各18只。三组分别给予腹腔注射丁苯酞注射液20 mg/kg+阿司匹林20 mg/kg、阿司匹林20 mg/kg与等体积的生理盐水,1次/d,检测血清及脑组织突触素及PSD-95表达变化情况。结果：（1）治疗第7 d与治疗第14 d后,丁苯酞组和阿司匹林组大鼠改良神经功能评分（Modified neurological severity scores,mNSS）均显著低于模型组（P<0.05）,丁苯酞组低于阿司匹林组（P<0.05）;（2）治疗第7 d与治疗第14 d,丁苯酞组、阿司匹林组大鼠的脑梗死体积百分比均显著低于模型组（P<0.05）,丁苯酞组低于阿司匹林组（P<0.05）;（3）治疗第7 d与治疗第14 d,丁苯酞组、阿司匹林组大鼠血清突触素及PSD-95表达水平均显著高于模型组（P<0.05）,丁苯酞组高于阿司匹林组（P<0.05）;（4）治疗第7 d与治疗第14 d后,丁苯酞组、阿司匹林组大鼠大脑组织突触素及PSD-95蛋白相对表达水平均显著高于模型组（P<0.05）,丁苯酞组高于阿司匹林组（P<0.05）。结论：丁苯酞在脑梗死模型大鼠的应用可促进大鼠血清及脑组织突触素及PSD-95的表达,并减小脑梗死面积,因而有利于大鼠的神经功能的恢复。     

Long term effect on mortality of stopping smoking after unstable angina and myocardial infarction.

Subjects who stop smoking cigarettes after myocardial infarction have an improved rate of survival compared with those who continue, but to date it was not known whether the benefit persisted for more than six years. A total of 498 men aged under 60 years who had survived a first episode of unstable angina or myocardial infarction by two years were followed up by life table methods for a further 13 years. Mortality in those who continued to smoke was significantly higher (82.1%) than in those who stopped smoking (36.9%). These differences increased with time. Mortality in those who were non-smokers initially and who continued not to smoke was intermediate (62.1%). The adverse effect of continued smoking was most pronounced in those with unstable angina. Continuing to smoke increased the rate of sudden death to a greater degree in those with less severe initial attacks, while the effect of smoking on fatal reinfarctions was most apparent in those with a more complicated presentation. These findings suggest that stopping cigarette smoking is the most effective single action in the management of patients with coronary heart disease.     

Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy--I: Prevention of death,myocardial infarction,and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the effects of "prolonged" antiplatelet therapy (that is, given for one month or more) on "vascular events" (non-fatal myocardial infarctions, non-fatal strokes, or vascular deaths) in various categories of patients. DESIGN--Overviews of 145 randomised trials of "prolonged" antiplatelet therapy versus control and 29 randomised comparisons between such antiplatelet regimens. SETTING--Randomised trials that could have been available by March 1990. SUBJECTS--Trials of antiplatelet therapy versus control included about 70,000 "high risk" patients (that is, with some vascular disease or other condition implying an increased risk of occlusive vascular disease) and 30,000 "low risk" subjects from the general population. Direct comparisons of different antiplatelet regimens involved about 10,000 high risk patients. RESULTS--In each of four main high risk categories of patients antiplatelet therapy was definitely protective. The percentages of patients suffering a vascular event among those allocated antiplatelet therapy versus appropriately adjusted control percentages (and mean scheduled treatment durations and net absolute benefits) were: (a) among about 20,000 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 10% antiplatelet therapy v 14% control (one month benefit about 40 vascular events avoided per 1000 patients treated (2P < 0.00001)); (b) among about 20,000 patients with a past history of myocardial infarction, 13% antiplatelet therapy v 17% control (two year benefit about 40/1000 (2P < 0.00001)); (c) among about 10,000 patients with a past history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, 18% antiplatelet therapy v 22% control (three year benefit about 40/1000 (2P < 0.00001)); (d) among about 20,000 patients with some other relevant medical history (unstable angina, stable angina, vascular surgery, angioplasty, atrial fibrillation, valvular disease, peripheral vascular disease, etc), 9% v 14% in 4000 patients with unstable angina (six month benefit about 50/1000 (2P < 0.00001)) and 6% v 8% in 16,000 other high risk patients (one year benefit about 20/1000 (2P < 0.00001)). Reductions in vascular events were about one quarter in each of these four main categories and were separately statistically significant in middle age and old age, in men and women, in hypertensive and normotensive patients, and in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Taking all high risk patients together showed reductions of about one third in non-fatal myocardial infarction, about one third in non-fatal stroke, and about one third in vascular death (each 2P < 0.00001). There was no evidence that non-vascular deaths were increased, so in each of the four main high risk categories overall mortality was significantly reduced. The most widely tested antiplatelet regimen was "medium dose" (75-325 mg/day) aspirin. Doses throughout this range seemed similarly effective (although in an acute emergency it might be prudent to use an initial dose of 160-325 mg rather than about 75 mg). There was no appreciable evidence that either a higher aspirin dose or any other antiplatelet regimen was more effective than medium dose aspirin in preventing vascular events. The optimal duration of treatment for patients with a past history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack could not be determined directly because most trials lasted only one, two, or three years (average about two years). Nevertheless, there was significant (2P < 0.0001) further benefit between the end of year 1 and the end of year 3, suggesting that longer treatment might well be more effective. Among low risk recipients of "primary prevention" a significant reduction of one third in non-fatal myocardial infarction was, however, accompanied by a non-significant increase in stroke. Furthermore, the absolute reduction in vascular events was much smaller than for high risk patients despite a much longer treatment period (4.4% antiplatelet therapy v 4.8% control; five year     

Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy--II: Maintenance of vascular graft or arterial patency by antiplatelet therapy. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in maintaining vascular patency in various categories of patients. DESIGN--Overviews of 46 randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy versus control and 14 randomised trials comparing one antiplatelet regimen with another. SETTING--Randomised trials that could have been available by March 1990 and in which vascular graft or arterial patency was to be studied systematically. SUBJECTS--About 8000 patients at varying degrees of risk of vascular occlusion (by virtue of disease or of having some vascular procedure) were in trials of antiplatelet therapy versus control and 4000 such patients were in trials directly comparing different antiplatelet regimens. RESULTS--Overall, antiplatelet therapy produced a highly significant (2P < 0.0001) reduction in vascular occlusion, with similar proportional reductions in several different types of patients. Hence the absolute reductions tended to be largest among patients at highest risk of occlusion, with smaller but still significant absolute reductions among lower risk patients. The proportions of patients with confirmed occlusion among those allocated antiplatelet therapy versus appropriately adjusted control proportions (and mean scheduled treatment durations and net absolute benefits) were: (a) among about 4000 patients with coronary artery grafts, 21% antiplatelet therapy v 30% control (seven month benefit about 90 patients protected per 1000 allocated antiplatelet therapy (2P < 0.00001)); (b) among about 800 patients after coronary angioplasty, 4% antiplatelet therapy v 8% control (six month benefit about 40/1000 (2P = 0.02)); (c) among about 3000 patients with peripheral artery procedures or disease, 16% antiplatelet therapy v 25% control (19 month benefit about 90/1000 (2P < 0.00001)); (d) among about 400 renal patients with a shunt or fistula placed for haemodialysis access, 17% antiplatelet therapy v 39% control (two month benefit about 200/1000 (2P < 0.00001)). Indirect comparisons between the effects of starting treatment before these vascular procedures and starting soon after them indicated similar sized benefits. As well as preventing subclinical occlusion, antiplatelet therapy produced a significant (2P = 0.002) reduction of about one quarter in the odds of suffering a "vascular event" (non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or vascular death). Various antiplatelet regimens (chiefly aspirin alone or aspirin plus dipyridamole) were studied but there was no significant evidence of differences between their effects on arterial occlusion or vascular events. Data on bleeding were incomplete but no large excess with antiplatelet therapy was apparent. CONCLUSION--Antiplatelet therapy (chiefly aspirin alone or aspirin plus dipyridamole) greatly reduces the risk of vascular occlusion in a wide range of patients at high risk of this complication. Further studies are required to determine exactly when treatment should start (to limit any perioperative bleeding while still preventing most early occlusion) and for how long it should be continued.     

Differential salicylate-aspirin interaction on vascular prostacyclin and platelet thromboxane synthesis in patients undergoing saphenectomy

We studied the ability of salicylate to counteract the effect of aspirin on platelet thromboxane synthesis and prostacyclin formation in venous tissue in patients undergoing saphenectomy. A single intravenous dose of 40 mg aspirin completely blocked thromboxane formation and reduced prostacyclin to about 43% of the control values. When salicylate (1000 mg po) corresponding in anesthetized subjects to blood levels of 25.9 +/- 5 micrograms/ml was administered before aspirin, vascular prostacyclin was no longer inhibited, whereas platelet thromboxane was still significantly blocked. These results suggest that the combination of salicylate with aspirin at an appropriate dose ratio may result in almost complete dissociation of the drug's effect on platelets and vessels in man.