Mutational analysis of the operators of bacteriophage lambda

Summary O ^c mutations in the operators of bacteriophage lambda have been used to analyze the functional organization of the operators. In each operator, repressor binding sites 1 and 2, as identified biochemically, were found to be primarily responsible for the repressor affinity of the operators in vitro and for the repression of lytic functions in vivo. In addition, both sites were shown to be involved in the action of cro product at the operators. The data obtained have been used to estimate the repressor affinities of the individual binding sites. These affinities suggest that repressor bound at O _R1 and O _R2 interacts cooperatively. The results obtained support a model for repression of the early lambda operons where repressor bound at binding sites 1 and 2 interferes with RNA polymerase binding to the promoter sites.     

Mechanism of promoter repression by Lac repressor–DNA loops

The Escherichia coli lactose (lac) operon encodes the first genetic switch to be discovered, and lac remains a paradigm for studying negative and positive control of gene expression. Negative control is believed to involve competition of RNA polymerase and Lac repressor for overlapping binding sites. Contributions to the local Lac repressor concentration come from free repressor and repressor delivered to the operator from remote auxiliary operators by DNA looping. Long-standing questions persist concerning the actual role of DNA looping in the mechanism of promoter repression. Here, we use experiments in living bacteria to resolve four of these questions. We show that the distance dependence of repression enhancement is comparable for upstream and downstream auxiliary operators, confirming the hypothesis that repressor concentration increase is the principal mechanism of repression loops. We find that as few as four turns of DNA can be constrained in a stable loop by Lac repressor. We show that RNA polymerase is not trapped at repressed promoters. Finally, we show that constraining a promoter in a tight DNA loop is sufficient for repression even when promoter and operator do not overlap.     

Nucleotide sequence of the operators of lambda ultravirulent mutants.

The nucleotide sequence of the operators of ultravirulent mutants of lambda, able to grow on host cells with elevated repressor levels, was determined. It appears that ultravirulence in lambda requires multiple mutational events at the operator sequences. OL1, OL2, and OL3 operator sites are the target of mutational changes in ultravirulent phages indicating that these sites participate in vivo in repression of the PL promoter. No changes were found in the OR3 sequence, in contrast there is a mutation in OR2 and two mutations in OR1, in both lambda 668 and lambda 2668 phages. This mutated operator structure accounts for the constitutive expression of their PR promoter either in cells overproducing the lambda repressor or in cells overproducing the cro gene product. A model of the structure of the lambda operator site is proposed. The nucleotide sequence in each site can be divided into two functionally different subsets, one of which is recognized by the repressor while the other stabilizes the repressor-operator interaction.     

A novel antivirulence element in the temperate bacteriophage HK022.

Lysogens of the temperate lambdoid phage HK022 are immune to superinfection by HK022. Superinfection immunity is conferred in part by the action of the HK022 CI repressor at the O.R operators. In this work, we have identified an additional regulatory element involved in immunity. This site, termed OFR (operator far right), is located just downstream of the cro gene, more than 250 nucleotides distant from OR. The behavior of phage containing a mutation in OFR suggests that the wild-type site functions as an antivirulence element. HK022 OFR- mutants were able to form turbid plaques indistinguishable from those of the wild type. However, they gave rise to virulent derivatives at a far higher frequency than the wild type (approximately 10(-5) for OFR- versus about 10(-9) for the wild type). This frequency was so high that cultures of HK022 OFR- lysogens were rapidly overgrown by virulent derivatives. Whereas virulent mutants arising from a wild-type OFR+ background contained mutations in both OR1 and OR2, virulent derivatives of the OFR- mutant phage contained a single mutation in either OR1 or OR2. We conclude that the wild-type OFR site functions to prevent single mutations in OR from conferring virulence. The mechanism by which OFR acts is not yet clear. Both CI and Cro bound to OFR and repressed a very weak rightward promoter (PFR). It is unlikely that repression of PFR by CI or Cro binding to OFR can account in full for the antivirulence phenotype conferred by this element, since PFR is such a weak promoter. Other models for the possible action of OFR are discussed.     

Kinetics of RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation: effects of nonspecific DNA-protein interactions.

The rates of formation of RNA polymerase-promoter open complexes at the galactose P2 and lactose UV5 promoters of E. coli were studied using polyacrylamide gels to separate the heparin-resistant complexes from unbound DNA. Both the apparent rate and extent of reaction at these promoters are inhibited at excess RNA polymerase. This inhibition, which can be relieved by the addition of non-promoter DNA, is interpreted to be the result of occlusion of the promoter site by nonspecifically bound polymerase. Additionally, biphasic kinetics are observed at both gal P2 and lac UV5, but not at the PR promoter of phage lambda. This behavior disappears when the concentration of RNA polymerase in the binding reaction is less than that of the promoter fragment. It is proposed that at excess enzyme nonspecifically bound polymerase molecules sliding along the DNA may "bump" closed complexes from the promoter site thereby reducing the rate of open complex formation. Kinetics mechanisms quantifying both the occlusion and bumping phenomena are presented.     

Repression by the cI protein of phage λ: in vitro inhibition of RNA synthesis

We have studied the in vitro repression of RNA synthesis by the cI protein of phage λ. We find that highly purified cI protein is an effective and specific repressor of RNA synthesis from the early gene region of λ DNA. Under optimal conditions at least 95% of the early gene RNA synthesis is repressed and this repression is eliminated or severely impaired by the use of λ DNA-carrying operator-type mutations which reduce the binding affinity of the cI protein. Highly effective repression can be demonstrated only through the use of the initiation-inhibitor rifampicin, which presumably, selects “properly” initiated RNA chains; thus we can by-pass in vitro but not yet solve the problem of how the host polymerase initiates specifically in vivo from the immediate-early promoter sites.     

The interaction of RNA polymerase and lac repressor with the lac control region.

We have examined the interactions of lac repressor and RNA polymerase with the DNA of the lac control region, using a method for direct visualization of the regions of DNA protected by proteins from DNAase attack. The repressor protects the operator essentially as reported by Gilbert and Maxam (1) with some small modifications. However, the evidence reported here concerning the binding of RNA polymerase to the DNA of the promoter mutant UV5 indicates that : 1) the RNA polymerase molecule binds asymmetrically to the promoter DNA, 2) RNA polymerase protects DNA sequences to within a few bases of the CAP binding site, suggesting direct interaction between polymerase and the CAP protein at this site, 3) RNA polymerase still binds to the promoter when repressor is bound to the operator, but fails to form the same extensive complex.