Sporicidal Activity of Synthetic Antifungal Undecapeptides and Control of Penicillium Rot of Apples

The antifungal activity of cecropin A(2-8)-melittin(6-9) hybrid undecapeptides, previously reported as active against plant pathogenic bacteria, was studied. A set of 15 sequences was screened in vitro against Fusarium oxysporum, Penicillium expansum, Aspergillus niger, and Rhizopus stolonifer. Most compounds were highly active against F. oxysporum (MIC < 2.5 μM) but were less active against the other fungi. The best peptides were studied for their sporicidal activity and for Sytox green uptake in F. oxysporum microconidia. A significant inverse linear relationship was observed between survival and fluorescence, indicating membrane disruption. Next, we evaluated the in vitro activity against P. expansum of a 125-member peptide library with the general structure R-X¹KLFKKILKX¹⁰L-NH₂, where X¹ and X¹⁰ corresponded to amino acids with various degrees of hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity and R included different N-terminal derivatizations. Fifteen sequences with MICs below 12.5 μM were identified. The most active compounds were BP21 {Ac,F,V} and BP34 {Ac,L,V} (MIC < 6.25 μM), where the braces denote R, X¹, and X¹⁰ positions and where Ac is an acetyl group. The peptides had sporicidal activity against P. expansum conidia. Seven of these peptides were tested in vivo by evaluating their preventative effect of inhibition of P. expansum infection in apple fruits. The peptide Ts-FKLFKKILKVL-NH₂ (BP22), where Ts is a tosyl group, was the most active with an average efficacy of 56% disease reduction, which was slightly lower than that of a commercial formulation of the fungicide imazalil.The discovery of antimicrobial compounds to treat plant diseases of economical importance in agriculture remains a major scientific challenge (1). Antimicrobial peptides are being considered as a good alternative to current fungicides and a great deal of scientific effort has been invested in studying their application in plant disease control (29, 34, 35).Antimicrobial peptides have been reported to display interesting activities against pathogenic microbes that are resistant to conventional antibiotics and to exhibit a broad spectrum of activity against bacteria, fungi, enveloped viruses, parasites, and tumor cells (7-10, 19, 20, 40, 49). The mechanism of action of these peptides against fungi consists of cell lysis by binding to the membrane surface and disrupting its structure, interference with the synthesis of essential cell wall components, or interaction with specific internal targets (12, 13, 15, 23, 29).Despite their good lytic activity, major concerns about the use of antimicrobial peptides as pesticides in plant protection are the high production cost associated with synthetic procedures and their low stability toward protease degradation. Several design strategies have been devised in order to find shorter and more stable peptides, while maintaining or increasing the activity with a low cytotoxicity. These strategies include the juxtaposition of fragments of natural antimicrobial peptides, the modification of natural peptides, and the de novo design of sequences maintaining the crucial features of native antimicrobial peptides (2, 3, 11, 24, 32, 38, 42). However, the process involved in the development of lead candidates is time consuming and limited by the number of individual compounds that can be synthesized. Combinatorial chemistry has allowed the rapid preparation of synthetic libraries and their screening has led to the identification of peptides with high activity against selected phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi (4, 26, 27, 33).During our current research oriented to the development of new antimicrobial agents for use in plant protection, we designed linear undecapeptides (CECMEL11) derived from the cecropin A-melittin hybrid peptide WKLFKKILKVL-NH₂ (Pep3) (5, 17). Using a combinatorial approach, we identified peptides with high activity against plant pathogenic bacteria, such as Erwinia amylovora, Xanthomonas vesicatoria, and Pseudomonas syringae, and with low susceptibility to protease degradation (4, 5).In order to broaden the study, we decided to test the CECMEL11 peptides against the plant pathogenic fungi Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus niger, Rhizopus stolonifer, and Penicillium expansum. The fungus F. oxysporum causes Fusarium wilt in more than a hundred species of plants, and it is an important pathogen in horticultural crops (44). Several Rhizopus and Penicillium species cause soft rot and blue mold rot, respectively, which are important postharvest diseases in stone and pome fruits (6, 18, 22, 39). Apart from the economic losses, Aspergillus and Penicillium species are also of interest from a public health point of view due to the production of mycotoxins (45, 47). The importance of Penicillium species in the postharvest of fruits emphasizes the interest to develop antimicrobial peptides to control this fungus.Taking into account the relevance of these pathogens, the aim of the present study was the analysis of the antifungal activity profile of the CECMEL11 peptides in order to identify sporicidal sequences against the above fungi. As a proof of concept, the feasibility of using such peptides to protect fruits from fungal spoilage was evaluated using a P. expansum/apple model.     

Enterocin X,a Novel Two-Peptide Bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecium KU-B5, Has an Antibacterial Spectrum Entirely Different from Those of Its Component Peptides

Enterocin X, composed of two antibacterial peptides (Xα and Xβ), is a novel class IIb bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecium KU-B5. When combined, Xα and Xβ display variably enhanced or reduced antibacterial activity toward a panel of indicators compared to each peptide individually. In E. faecium strains that produce enterocins A and B, such as KU-B5, only one additional bacteriocin had previously been known.Bacteriocins are gene-encoded antibacterial peptides and proteins. Because of their natural ability to preserve food, they are of particular interest to researchers in the food industry. Bacteriocins are grouped into three main classes according to their physical properties and compositions (11, 12). Of these, class IIb bacteriocins are thermostable non-lanthionine-containing two-peptide bacteriocins whose full antibacterial activity requires the interaction of two complementary peptides (8, 19). Therefore, two-peptide bacteriocins are considered to function together as one antibacterial entity (14).Enterocins A and B, first discovered and identified about 12 years ago (2, 3), are frequently present in Enterococcus faecium strains from various sources (3, 5, 6, 9, 13, 16). So far, no other bacteriocins have been identified in these strains, except the enterocin P-like bacteriocin from E. faecium JCM 5804^T (18). Here, we describe the characterization and genetic identification of enterocin X in E. faecium KU-B5. Enterocin X (identified after the enterocin P-like bacteriocin was discovered) is a newly found class IIb bacteriocin in E. faecium strains that produce enterocins A and B.     

Inactivation of Vibrio anguillarum by Attached and Planktonic Roseobacter Cells

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the inhibition of Vibrio by Roseobacter in a combined liquid-surface system. Exposure of Vibrio anguillarum to surface-attached roseobacters (10⁷ CFU/cm²) resulted in significant reduction or complete killing of the pathogen inoculated at 10² to 10⁴ CFU/ml. The effect was likely associated with the production of tropodithietic acid (TDA), as a TDA-negative mutant did not affect survival or growth of V. anguillarum.Antagonistic interactions among marine bacteria are well documented, and secretion of antagonistic compounds is common among bacteria that colonize particles or surfaces (8, 13, 16, 21, 31). These marine bacteria may be interesting as sources for new antimicrobial drugs or as probiotic bacteria for aquaculture.Aquaculture is a rapidly growing sector, but outbreaks of bacterial diseases are a limiting factor and pose a threat, especially to young fish and invertebrates that cannot be vaccinated. Because regular or prophylactic administration of antibiotics must be avoided, probiotic bacteria are considered an alternative (9, 18, 34, 38, 39, 40). Several microorganisms have been able to reduce bacterial diseases in challenge trials with fish or fish larvae (14, 24, 25, 27, 33, 37, 39, 40). One example is Phaeobacter strain 27-4 (17), which inhibits Vibrio anguillarum and reduces mortality in turbot larvae (27). The antagonism of Phaeobacter 27-4 and the closely related Phaeobacter inhibens is due mainly to the sulfur-containing tropolone derivative tropodithietic acid (TDA) (2, 5), which is also produced by other Phaeobacter strains and Ruegeria mobilis (28). Phaeobacter and Ruegeria strains or their DNA has been commonly found in marine larva-rearing sites (6, 17, 28).Phaeobacter and Ruegeria (Alphaproteobacteria, Roseobacter clade) are efficient surface colonizers (7, 11, 31, 36). They are abundant in coastal and eutrophic zones and are often associated with algae (3, 7, 41). Surface-attached Phaeobacter bacteria may play an important role in determining the species composition of an emerging biofilm, as even low densities of attached Phaeobacter strain SK2.10 bacteria can prevent other marine organisms from colonizing solid surfaces (30, 32).In continuation of the previous research on roseobacters as aquaculture probiotics, the purpose of this study was to determine the antagonistic potential of Phaeobacter and Ruegeria against Vibrio anguillarum in liquid systems that mimic a larva-rearing environment. Since production of TDA in liquid marine broth appears to be highest when roseobacters form an air-liquid biofilm (5), we addressed whether they could be applied as biofilms on solid surfaces.     

Enrichment and Site Mapping of O-Linked N-Acetylglucosamine by a Combination of Chemical/Enzymatic Tagging, Photochemical Cleavage, and Electron Transfer Dissociation Mass Spectrometry

Numerous cellular processes are regulated by the reversible addition of either phosphate or O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) to nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins. Although sensitive methods exist for the enrichment and identification of protein phosphorylation sites, those for the enrichment of O-GlcNAc-containing peptides are lacking. Reported here is highly efficient methodology for the enrichment and characterization of O-GlcNAc sites from complex samples. In this method, O-GlcNAc-modified peptides are tagged with a novel biotinylation reagent, enriched by affinity chromatography, released from the solid support by photochemical cleavage, and analyzed by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Using this strategy, eight O-GlcNAc sites were mapped from a tau-enriched sample from rat brain. Sites of GlcNAcylation were characterized on important neuronal proteins such as tau, synucleins, and methyl CpG-binding protein 2.Numerous cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins are post-translationally modified with O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc).¹ GlcNAcylation is involved in almost all aspects of cellular metabolism (1) and is highly dependent on the nutrient status of the cell (2). The O-GlcNAc modification rivals phosphorylation in both abundance and protein distribution. Recent studies indicate that signaling pathways can be regulated by the interplay of these two modifications at the same or proximal sites on numerous protein substrates (3).Current understanding of the functions of O-GlcNAc and of the function of O-GlcNAcylation and its relationship to phosphorylation is severely hampered by the difficulties in detecting this labile monosaccharide modification. Problems associated with the identification of O-GlcNAc sites include the following. (a) O-GlcNAc is quickly removed by hydrolases during cell lysis. (b) Like phosphorylation, O-GlcNAc is usually present in less than stoichiometric amounts at given sites on protein substrates. (c) O-GlcNAc is readily lost as an oxonium ion during conventional peptide sequence analysis by collision-activated dissociation (CAD) (supplemental Fig. 1). (d) Modified and unmodified forms of the peptide often co-elute during reverse phase HPLC (supplemental Fig. 2), and the preferential ionization of the unmodified peptide suppresses the signal observed for the corresponding O-GlcNAc-modified peptide (supplemental Fig. 2, b and c).Several attempts have been made to enrich samples for O-GlcNAc-modified proteins and peptides. Immunoaffinity purification of O-GlcNAc-modified peptides with an antibody (CTD 110.6) has been largely unsuccessful because of low binding avidity (4). Long, wheat germ agglutinin lectin columns (∼39 ft) provide some enrichment but also bind strongly to complex glycans (5). A mutant galactosyltransferase (GalT1) has been used to label GlcNAcylated proteins with a ketone-containing galactose analog (6). Following proteolytic digestion, O-GlcNAc-modified peptides were biotinylated with hydrazine chemistry, isolated on a column packed with avidin beads, eluted with free biotin, and sequenced by ETD mass spectrometry. Failure to elute peptides with high efficiency from the avidin column and an inability to direct the fragmentation to the peptide backbone limit the usefulness of this approach. Reported here is an enrichment methodology that (a) is highly specific for O-GlcNAc-modified peptides, (b) provides for efficient release of the captured peptides from an affinity support, and (c) facilitates complete characterization of the released peptides by ETD mass spectrometry.     

Specific Degradation of the Mucus Adhesion-Promoting Protein (MapA) of Lactobacillus reuteri to an Antimicrobial Peptide

The intestinal flora of mammals contains lactic acid bacteria (LAB) that may provide positive health effects for the host. Such bacteria are referred to as probiotic bacteria. From a pig, we have isolated a Lactobacillus reuteri strain that produces an antimicrobial peptide (AMP). The peptide was purified and characterized, and it was unequivocally shown that the AMP was a well-defined degradation product obtained from the mucus adhesion-promoting protein (MapA); it was therefore termed AP48-MapA. This finding demonstrates how large proteins might inherit unexpected pleiotropic functions by conferring antimicrobial capacities on the producer. The MapA/AP48-MapA system is the first example where a large protein of an intestinal LAB is shown to give rise to such an AMP. It is also of particular interest that the protein that provides this AMP is associated with the binding of the bacterium producing it to the surface/lining of the gut. This finding gives us new perspective on how some probiotic bacteria may successfully compete in this environment and thereby contribute to a healthy microbiota.Mammals have a microbiota in their digestive tract that contains lactic acid bacteria (LAB). It has been increasingly evident that some of these lactic acid bacteria produce antimicrobial peptides that may contribute to the positive effect on their host. Such bacteria are often referred to as probiotics, and one of their important beneficial effects is their ability to produce antimicrobial compounds that prevent or interfere with the growth of pathogenic bacteria in the host.It is known that the fecal microflora of pigs/piglets is large and diverse and develops rapidly after birth. Lactobacillus reuteri is among the very first lactic acid bacteria that colonize the intestine of new-born piglets, and their numbers gradually increase until they become the most dominant LAB in pigs (5, 17, 28). Other lactobacilli that are also part of the gut microbiota of pigs include L. amylovorus, L. acidophilus, L. salivarius, and L. casei (4, 8). Probiotic isolates have been identified within all these species, and many of them are today used as food/feed supplements to support good health (4, 11, 27). An important part of the antimicrobial arsenal produced by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is a group of peptides called bacteriocins, which are ribosomally synthesized antibiotic-like peptides (antimicrobial peptides [AMPs]) (3, 7, 19). The bacteriocins constitute a wide range of structurally different peptides that are divided into different classes and subclasses. Some are modified (the lantibiotics, or class I), while others are basically unmodified (class II) (3, 6, 19).Most bacteriocins are derived from prepeptides, each containing a short leader sequence (14 to 30 amino acids [aa]) which is cleaved off during the secretion of the mature peptide (19). In recent years, a new group of AMPs have been recognized (18); these are different from regular bacteriocins in that they are derived from larger proteins through specific degradations, leading to a defined peptide possessing antimicrobial activity. Such antimicrobial peptides have been known for a long time in mammalian systems. For instance, lactoferrin, a protein in milk, is readily degraded to a specific antimicrobial peptide through heat, acid treatment, or pepsin digestion (14, 24, 26). Defined histone fragments with antimicrobial properties have been isolated from different eukaryotic species (1, 2, 15, 21, 23), and a few antimicrobial peptides derived from larger proteins have been isolated in bacteria, including Helicobacter pylori (22), propionic acid bacteria (9, 10), and Clostridium beijerinckii (13). Such antimicrobial peptides are most likely formed by proteolytic degradation during cell proliferation or death.     

Neurofibromin Homologs Ira1 and Ira2 Affect Glycerophosphoinositol Production and Transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Saccharomyces cerevisiae produces extracellular glycerophosphoinositol through phospholipase-mediated turnover of phosphatidylinositol and transports glycerophosphoinositol into the cell upon nutrient limitation. A screening identified the RAS GTPase-activating proteins Ira1 and Ira2 as required for utilization of glycerophosphoinositol as the sole phosphate source, but the RAS/cyclic AMP pathway does not appear to be involved in the growth phenotype. Ira1 and Ira2 affect both the production and transport of glycerophosphoinositol.Membrane phospholipids are continually synthesized and degraded as cells grow and respond to environmental conditions. A major pathway of phosphatidylinositol (PI) turnover in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is its deacylation to produce extracellular glycerophosphoinositol (GroPIns) (3). Plb3, an enzyme with phospholipase B (PLB)/lysophospholipase activity, is thought to be primarily responsible for the production of extracellular GroPIns, with Plb1 playing a lesser role (11, 12, 13). GroPIns is transported into the cell by the Git1 permease (17). GIT1 expression is upregulated by phosphate limitation and inositol limitation. In fact, GroPIns can act as the cell''s sole source of both inositol (17) and phosphate (1).A screening for gene products involved in the process by which GroPIns enters the cellular metabolism identified Ira1 and Ira2, yeast homologs of the mammalian protein neurofibromin. Alterations in NF1, the gene encoding neurofibromin, are associated with the pathogenesis of neurofibromatosis type 1, an autosomal dominant genetic disease (4, 5, 25). Ira1 and Ira2 and neurofibromin function as RAS GTPase-activating proteins (RAS GAPs). S. cerevisiae Ras1 and Ras2 activate adenylate cyclase to modulate cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels. The binding of cAMP to the regulatory subunits of protein kinase A (Bcy1) results in dissociation and activation of the catalytic subunits (Tpk1 to Tpk3). Ira1 and Ira2 inactivate RAS and thereby downregulate the pathway (18, 19). Hydrolysis of cAMP by the phosphodiesterases encoded by PDE1 and PDE2 also downregulate the pathway (7, 20, 23). The RAS/cAMP pathway responds to nutrient signals to modulate fundamental cellular processes, including stress resistance, metabolism, and cell proliferation (7, 20, 21).     

Role of Septins in the Orientation of Forespore Membrane Extension during Sporulation in Fission Yeast

During yeast sporulation, a forespore membrane (FSM) initiates at each spindle-pole body and extends to form the spore envelope. We used Schizosaccharomyces pombe to investigate the role of septins during this process. During the prior conjugation of haploid cells, the four vegetatively expressed septins (Spn1, Spn2, Spn3, and Spn4) coassemble at the fusion site and are necessary for its normal morphogenesis. Sporulation involves a different set of four septins (Spn2, Spn5, Spn6, and the atypical Spn7) that does not include the core subunits of the vegetative septin complex. The four sporulation septins form a complex in vitro and colocalize interdependently to a ring-shaped structure along each FSM, and septin mutations result in disoriented FSM extension. The septins and the leading-edge proteins appear to function in parallel to orient FSM extension. Spn2 and Spn7 bind to phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate [PtdIns(4)P] in vitro, and PtdIns(4)P is enriched in the FSMs, suggesting that septins bind to the FSMs via this lipid. Cells expressing a mutant Spn2 protein unable to bind PtdIns(4)P still form extended septin structures, but these structures fail to associate with the FSMs, which are frequently disoriented. Thus, septins appear to form a scaffold that helps to guide the oriented extension of the FSM.Yeast sporulation is a developmental process that involves multiple, sequential events that need to be tightly coordinated (59, 68). In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, when cells of opposite mating type (h⁺ and h⁻) are mixed and shifted to conditions of nitrogen starvation, cell fusion and karyogamy occur to form a diploid zygote, which then undergoes premeiotic DNA replication, the two meiotic divisions, formation of the spore envelopes (comprising the plasma membrane and a specialized cell wall), and maturation of the spores (74, 81). At the onset of meiosis II, precursors of the spore envelopes, the forespore membranes (FSMs), are formed by the fusion of vesicles at the cytoplasmic surface of each spindle-pole body (SPB) and then extend to engulf the four nuclear lobes (the nuclear envelope does not break down during meiosis), thus capturing the haploid nuclei, along with associated cytoplasm and organelles, to form the nascent spores (55, 68, 81). How the FSMs recognize and interact with the nuclear envelope, extend in a properly oriented manner, and close to form uniformly sized spherical spores is not understood, and study of this model system should also help to elucidate the more general question of how membranes obtain their shapes in vivo.It has been shown that both the SPB and the vesicle trafficking system play important roles in the formation and development of the FSM and of its counterpart in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the prospore membrane (PSM). In S. pombe, the SPB changes its shape from a compact dot to a crescent at metaphase of meiosis II (26, 29), and its outer plaque acquires meiosis-specific components such as Spo2, Spo13, and Spo15 (30, 57, 68). This modified outer plaque is required for the initiation of FSM assembly. In S. cerevisiae, it is well established that various secretory (SEC) gene products are required for PSM formation (58, 59). Similarly, proteins presumably involved in the docking and/or fusion of post-Golgi vesicles and organelles in S. pombe, such as the syntaxin-1A Psy1, the SNAP-25 homologue Sec9, and the Rab7 GTPase homologue Ypt7, are also required for proper FSM extension (34, 53, 54). Consistent with this hypothesis, Psy1 disappears from the plasma membrane upon exit from meiosis I and reappears in the nascent FSM.Phosphoinositide-mediated membrane trafficking also contributes to the development of the FSM. Pik3/Vps34 is a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase whose product is phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate [PtdIns(3)P] (35, 72). S. pombe cells lacking this protein exhibit defects in various steps of FSM formation, such as aberrant starting positions for extension, disoriented extension and/or failure of closure, and the formation of spore-like bodies near, rather than surrounding, the nuclei, suggesting that Pik3 plays multiple roles during sporulation (61). The targets of PtdIns(3)P during sporulation appear to include two sorting nexins, Vps5 and Vps17, and the FYVE domain-containing protein Sst4/Vps27. vps5Δ and vps17Δ mutant cells share some of the phenotypes of pik3Δ cells (38). sst4Δ cells also share some of the phenotypes of pik3Δ cells but are distinct from vps5Δ and vps17Δ cells, consistent with the hypothesis that Pik3 has multiple roles during sporulation (62).Membrane trafficking processes alone do not seem sufficient to explain how the FSMs and PSMs extend around and engulf the nuclei, suggesting that some other mechanism(s) must regulate and orient FSM/PSM extension. The observation that the FSM is attached to the SPB until formation of the immature spore is complete (68) suggests that the SPB may regulate FSM extension. In addition, the leading edge of the S. cerevisiae PSM is coated with a complex of proteins (the LEPs) that appear to be involved in PSM extension (51, 59). S. pombe Meu14 also localizes to the leading edge of the FSM, and deletion of meu14 causes aberrant FSM formation in addition to a failure in SPB modification (60). However, it has remained unclear whether the SPB- and LEP-based mechanisms are sufficient to account for the formation of closed FSMs and PSMs of proper size and position (relative to the nuclear envelope), and evidence from S. cerevisiae has suggested that the septin proteins may also be involved.The septins are a conserved family of GTP-binding proteins that were first identified in S. cerevisiae by analysis of the cytokinesis-defective cdc3, cdc10, cdc11, and cdc12 mutants (41). Cdc3, Cdc10, Cdc11, and Cdc12 are related to each other in sequence and form an oligomeric complex that localizes to a ring in close apposition to the plasma membrane at the mother-bud neck in vegetative cells (12, 20, 25, 41, 47, 77). The septin ring appears to be filamentous in vivo (12), and indeed, the septins from both yeast (11, 20) and metazoans (31, 36, 69) can form filaments in vitro. The yeast septin ring appears to form a scaffold for the localization and organization of a wide variety of other proteins (8, 22), and it forms a diffusion barrier that constrains movement of membrane proteins through the neck region (7, 8, 73). In metazoan cells, the septins are involved in cytokinesis but are also implicated in a variety of other cellular processes, such as vesicular transport, organization of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons, and oncogenesis (27, 70).In S. cerevisiae, a fifth septin (Shs1) is also expressed in vegetative cells, but the remaining two septin genes, SPR3 and SPR28, are expressed at detectable levels only during sporulation (15, 17). In addition, at least some of the vegetatively expressed septins are also present in sporulating cells (17, 48), and one of them (Cdc10) is expressed at much higher levels there than in vegetative cells (32). The septins present during sporulation are associated with the PSM (15, 17, 48, 51), and their normal organization there depends on the Gip1-Glc7 protein phosphatase complex (71). However, it has been difficult to gain insight into the precise roles of the septins during sporulation in S. cerevisiae (59), because some septins are essential for viability during vegetative growth, and the viable mutants have only mild phenotypes during sporulation (15, 17), possibly because of functional redundancy among the multiple septins.S. pombe seemed likely to provide a better opportunity for investigating the role of septins during spore formation. There are seven septin genes (spn1⁺ to spn7⁺) in this organism (23, 41, 63). Four of these genes (spn1⁺ to spn4⁺) are expressed in vegetative cells, and their products form a hetero-oligomeric complex that assembles during cytokinesis into a ring at the division site (2, 3, 10, 76, 79). The septin ring is important for proper targeting of endoglucanases to the division site (44), and septin mutants show a corresponding delay in cell separation (10, 41, 44, 76). However, even the spn1Δ spn2Δ spn3Δ spn4Δ quadruple mutant is viable and grows nearly as rapidly as the wild type (our unpublished results), a circumstance that greatly facilitates studies of the septins'' role during sporulation.spn5⁺, spn6⁺, and spn7⁺ are expressed at detectable levels only during sporulation (1, 45, 78; our unpublished results), and spn2⁺, like its orthologue CDC10 (see above), is strongly induced (45), but the roles of the S. pombe septins in sporulation have not previously been investigated. In this study, we show that the septins are important for the orientation of FSM extension, suggesting that the septins may have a more general role in dynamic membrane organization and shape determination.     

Expression of a Synthesized Gene Encoding Cationic Peptide Cecropin B in Transgenic Tomato Plants Protects against Bacterial Diseases

The cationic lytic peptide cecropin B (CB), isolated from the giant silk moth (Hyalophora cecropia), has been shown to effectively eliminate Gram-negative and some Gram-positive bacteria. In this study, the effects of chemically synthesized CB on plant pathogens were investigated. The S₅₀s (the peptide concentrations causing 50% survival of a pathogenic bacterium) of CB against two major pathogens of the tomato, Ralstonia solanacearum and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, were 529.6 μg/ml and 0.29 μg/ml, respectively. The CB gene was then fused to the secretory signal peptide (sp) sequence from the barley α-amylase gene, and the new construct, pBI121-spCB, was used for the transformation of tomato plants. Integration of the CB gene into the tomato genome was confirmed by PCR, and its expression was confirmed by Western blot analyses. In vivo studies of the transgenic tomato plant demonstrated significant resistance to bacterial wilt and bacterial spot. The levels of CB expressed in transgenic tomato plants (∼0.05 μg in 50 mg of leaves) were far lower than the S₅₀ determined in vitro. CB transgenic tomatoes could therefore be a new mode of bioprotection against these two plant diseases with significant agricultural applications.Bacterial plant diseases are a source of great losses in the annual yields of most crops (5). The agrochemical methods and conventional breeding commonly used to control these bacterially induced diseases have many drawbacks. Indiscriminate use of agrochemicals has a negative impact on human, as well as animal, health and contributes to environmental pollution. Conventional plant-breeding strategies have limited scope due to the paucity of genes with these traits in the usable gene pools and their time-consuming nature. Consequently, genetic engineering and transformation technology offer better tools to test the efficacies of genes for crop improvement and to provide a better understanding of their mechanisms. One advance is the possibility of creating transgenic plants that overexpress recombinant DNA or novel genes with resistance to pathogens (36). In particular, strengthening the biological defenses of a crop by the production of antibacterial proteins with other origins (not from plants) offers a novel strategy to increase the resistance of crops to diseases (35, 39, 41). These antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) include such peptides as cecropins (2, 15, 20, 23-24, 27, 31, 42, 50), magainins (1, 9, 14, 29, 47), sarcotoxin IA (35, 40), and tachyplesin I (3). The genes encoding these small AMPs in plants have been used in practice to enhance their resistance to bacterial and fungal pathogens (8, 22, 40). The expression of AMPs in vivo (mostly cecropins and a synthetic analog of cecropin and magainin) with either specific or broad-spectrum disease resistance in tobacco (14, 24, 27), potato (17, 42), rice (46), banana (9), and hybrid poplar (32) have been reported. The transgenic plants showed considerably greater resistance to certain pathogens than the wild types (4, 13, 24, 27, 42, 46, 50). However, detailed studies of transgenic tomatoes expressing natural cecropin have not yet been reported.The tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is one of the most commonly consumed vegetables worldwide. The annual yield of tomatoes, however, is severely affected by two common bacterial diseases, bacterial wilt and bacterial spot, which are caused by infection with the Gram-negative bacteria Ralstonia solanacearum and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, respectively. Currently available pesticides are ineffective against R. solanacearum, and thus bacterial wilt is a serious problem.Cecropins, one of the natural lytic peptides found in the giant silk moth, Hyalophora cecropia (25), are synthesized in lipid bodies as proteins consisting of 31 to 39 amino acid residues. They adopt an α-helical structure on interaction with bacterial membranes, resulting in the formation of ion channels (12). At low concentrations (0.1 μM to 5 μM), cecropins exhibit lytic antibacterial activity against a number of Gram-negative and some Gram-positive bacteria, but not against eukaryotic cells (11, 26, 33), thus making them potentially powerful tools for engineering bacterial resistance in crops. Moreover, cecropin B (CB) shows the strongest activity against Gram-negative bacteria within the cecropin family and therefore has been considered an excellent candidate for transformation into plants to improve their resistance against bacterial diseases.The introduction of genes encoding cecropins and their analogs into tobacco has been reported to have contradictory results regarding resistance against pathogens (20). However, subsequent investigations of these tobacco plants showed that the expression of CB in the plants did not result in accumulation of detectable levels of CB, presumably due to degradation of the peptide by host peptidases (20, 34). Therefore, protection of CB from cellular degradation is considered to be vital for the exploitation of its antibacterial activity in transgenic plants. The secretory sequences of several genes are helpful, because they cooperate with the desired genes to enhance extracellular secretion (24, 40, 46). In the present study, a natural CB gene was successfully transferred into tomatoes. The transgenic plants showed significant resistance to the tomato diseases bacterial wilt and bacterial spot, as well as with a chemically synthesized CB peptide.     

O-Linked N-Acetylglucosamine Modification of Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Occurs in Close Proximity to Multiple SH2 Domain Binding Motifs

Insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) is a highly phosphorylated adaptor protein critical to insulin and IGF-1 receptor signaling. Ser/Thr kinases impact the metabolic and mitogenic effects elicited by insulin and IGF-1 through feedback and feed forward regulation at the level of IRS-1. Ser/Thr residues of IRS-1 are also O-GlcNAc-modified, which may influence the phosphorylation status of the protein. To facilitate the understanding of the functional effects of O-GlcNAc modification on IRS-1-mediated signaling, we identified the sites of O-GlcNAc modification of rat and human IRS-1. Tandem mass spectrometric analysis of IRS-1, exogenously expressed in HEK293 cells, revealed that the C terminus, which is rich in docking sites for SH2 domain-containing proteins, was O-GlcNAc-modified at multiple residues. Rat IRS-1 was O-GlcNAc-modified at Ser⁹¹⁴, Ser¹⁰⁰⁹, Ser¹⁰³⁶, and Ser¹⁰⁴¹. Human IRS-1 was O-GlcNAc-modified at Ser⁹⁸⁴ or Ser⁹⁸⁵, at Ser¹⁰¹¹, and possibly at multiple sites within residues 1025–1045. O-GlcNAc modification at a conserved residue in rat (Ser¹⁰⁰⁹) and human (Ser¹⁰¹¹) IRS-1 is adjacent to a putative binding motif for the N-terminal SH2 domains of p85α and p85β regulatory subunits of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and the tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 (PTPN11). Immunoblot analysis using an antibody generated against human IRS-1 Ser¹⁰¹¹ GlcNAc further confirmed the site of attachment and the identity of the +203.2-Da mass shift as β-N-acetylglucosamine. The accumulation of IRS-1 Ser¹⁰¹¹ GlcNAc in HEPG2 liver cells and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts upon inhibition of O-GlcNAcase indicates that O-GlcNAcylation of endogenously expressed IRS-1 is a dynamic process that occurs at normal glucose concentrations (5 mm). O-GlcNAc modification did not occur at any known or newly identified Ser/Thr phosphorylation sites and in most cases occurred simultaneously with phosphorylation of nearby residues. These findings suggest that O-GlcNAc modification represents an additional layer of posttranslational regulation that may impact the specificity of effects elicited by insulin and IGF-1.Insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1)1 is a highly phosphorylated adaptor protein critical to insulin and IGF-1 receptor signaling. Many of the metabolic and mitogenic effects elicited by insulin and IGF-1 are mediated and modulated by posttranslational modifications of IRS-1, and tight regulation at the posttranslational level is crucial for maintaining insulin sensitivity and controlling growth factor-induced proliferation. Following hormonal stimulation, IRS-1 is phosphorylated by the receptor tyrosine kinases creating SH2 domain docking sites for downstream binding partners including the p85 regulatory subunits of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, Grb2, and the tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 (PTPN11) (1). Binding of p85 phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Grb2 activate the PI3K/Akt and Ras-MAPK pathways, respectively, whereas binding of SHP2 results in tyrosine dephosphorylation and signal attenuation (2). Positive and negative feedback regulation by Ser/Thr kinases, such as Akt (3), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) (4), S6K (5), and ERK (6), impact the interactions of IRS-1 with SH2 domain proteins and the receptor thereby affecting the duration and outcome of the signal. IRS-1 has been described as a central node for the integration of information regarding the nutrient and stress status of the cell (7). This information is encoded by site-specific phosphorylation by a number of kinases that regulate the specificity of effects that are elicited following receptor stimulation. Many sites of Ser/Thr phosphorylation have been identified on IRS-1, and cross-talk among Tyr and Ser/Thr phosphorylations at specific residues is evidence of dynamic and complex posttranslational regulation (8, 9). Inappropriate phosphorylation of IRS-1 resulting in the disruption of interactions of IRS-1 with binding partners is implicated in the development of insulin resistance (10) and altered IGF-1 signaling in breast cancer tissue (11, 12).In addition to phosphorylation, Ser/Thr residues in IRS-1 are also dynamically modified by GlcNAc in a nutrient-responsive manner. As opposed to a negatively charged phosphate group, O-GlcNAcylation imparts a bulky, hydrophilic, electrostatically neutral moiety to Ser/Thr residues. The enzymes responsible for the incorporation and removal of the monosaccharide from proteins, O-GlcNAc-transferase and O-GlcNAcase, respectively, are localized in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of all eukaryotic cells (13, 14). Recent studies suggest that the activity of O-GlcNAc-transferase is regulated by insulin (15) and that localization of O-GlcNAc-transferase to the membrane is driven by direct association with phosphatidylinositide 3-phosphate (16). The abundance of O-GlcNAc modification on many proteins in the insulin signaling pathway increases with sustained high glucose and chronic insulin stimulation, and elevated O-GlcNAc modification of IRS-1 correlates with the development of insulin resistance in multiple cell types including 3T3-L1 adipocytes (17, 18), MIN6 pancreatic beta cells (19), Fao rat hepatoma cells (16), human aortic endothelial cells (20), and skeletal muscle (21). The impact of O-GlcNAcylation on insulin signaling and diabetic complications was reviewed recently (22, 23). The direct effect of O-GlcNAc modification on signaling via IRS-1 is not known because conditions that mimic those in the uncontrolled diabetic patient may also result in phosphorylation of IRS-1 at inhibitory sites (16, 24) and O-GlcNAc modification of other proteins in the insulin signaling pathway, such as the insulin receptor, Akt (18), FoxO (25), AMP-activated protein kinase (26), and β-catenin (17).To elucidate site-specific effects of O-GlcNAc modification on IRS-1-mediated signal transduction, we identified the sites of O-GlcNAc modification of rat and human IRS-1 by tandem mass spectrometry. To facilitate detection of the O-GlcNAc-modified peptides and assign the sites of modification, CID coupled with neutral loss-triggered MS3 and electron transfer dissociation (ETD) (27) tandem spectrometric approaches were used. Fragmentation of O-GlcNAc-modified peptides by ETD did not destroy the labile O-linkage (28) permitting direct detection of these peptides by the database searching algorithm ProteinProspector2 (29). O-GlcNAc modification occurred in close proximity to multiple SH2 domain binding motifs and within a region of IRS-1 shown previously to interact with the insulin and IGF-1 receptors (30).     

Development of Bacteriocinogenic Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Heterologously Expressing and Secreting the Leaderless Enterocin L50 Peptides L50A and L50B from Enterococcus faecium L50

A segregationally stable expression and secretion vector for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, named pYABD01, was constructed by cloning the yeast gene region encoding the mating pheromone α-factor 1 secretion signal (MFα1_s) into the S. cerevisiae high-copy-number expression vector pYES2. The structural genes of the two leaderless peptides of enterocin L50 (EntL50A and EntL50B) from Enterococcus faecium L50 were cloned, separately (entL50A or entL50B) and together (entL50AB), into pYABD01 under the control of the galactose-inducible promoter P_GAL1. The generation of recombinant S. cerevisiae strains heterologously expressing and secreting biologically active EntL50A and EntL50B demonstrates the suitability of the MFα1_s-containing vector pYABD01 to direct processing and secretion of these antimicrobial peptides through the S. cerevisiae Sec system.Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely known for their ability to produce a variety of ribosomally synthesized proteins or peptides, referred to as bacteriocins, displaying antimicrobial activity against a broad range of gram-positive bacteria and, to a lesser extent, gram-negative bacteria, including spoilage and food-borne pathogenic microorganisms (11, 19, 33, 34, 36, 37). These antimicrobials may be classified into three main classes: (i) the lantibiotics, or posttranslationally modified peptides; (ii) the nonmodified, small, heat-stable peptides; and (iii) the large, heat-labile protein bacteriocins. Class II bacteriocins are further grouped into five subclasses: the subclass IIa (pediocin-like bacteriocins containing the N-terminal conserved motif YGNGVxC), the subclass IIb (two-peptide bacteriocins), the subclass IIc (leaderless bacteriocins), the subclass IId (circular bacteriocins), and the subclass IIe (other peptide bacteriocins) (17, 19, 21, 37). All lantibiotics and most class II bacteriocins are synthesized as biologically inactive precursors containing an N-terminal extension (the so-called double-glycine-type leader sequence or the Sec-dependent signal peptide), which is cleaved off concomitantly with externalization of biologically active bacteriocins by a dedicated ATP-binding cassette transporter and its accessory protein or by the Sec system and the signal peptidases, respectively (11, 17). Interestingly, only a few bacteriocins described to date are synthesized without an N-terminal extension, including enterocin L50 (L50A and L50B) (8), enterocin Q (EntQ) (10), enterocin EJ97 (41), and the bacteriocin LsbB (20).In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the application of bacteriocinogenic microorganisms and/or their bacteriocins as biopreservatives to guarantee the safety and quality of foods and beverages, such as fermented vegetables and meats, dairy and fish products, and wine and beer (12, 15, 16, 39, 47). Three main strategies for the use of bacteriocins as food biopreservatives have been proposed: (i) addition of a purified/semipurified bacteriocin preparation as a food additive; (ii) use of a substrate previously fermented by a bacteriocin-producing strain as a food ingredient; and/or (iii) inoculation of a culture to produce the bacteriocin in situ in fermented foods (13, 15). The lantibiotic nisin A is the most widely characterized bacteriocin and the only one that has been legally approved in more than 48 countries as a food additive for use in certain types of cheeses (13, 16). Likewise, nisin A has been approved as a beer additive in Australia and New Zealand (16). However, the difficulties encountered in addressing the regulatory approval of new bacteriocins as food additives have spurred the development of the other bacteriocin-based food biopreservation strategies (13, 17).Beer is a beverage with a remarkable microbiological stability and is considered as a food substrate difficult to spoil. However, some LAB, such as Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus lindneri, and Pediococcus damnosus, are able to spoil beer and are recognized as the most hazardous bacteria for breweries, being responsible for approximately 70% of microbial beer spoilage incidents (40, 47). The ever-growing consumer demand for less-processed and less chemically preserved foods and beverages is promoting the development of alternative biocontrol strategies, such as those based on the use of bacteriocins as biopreservatives (12, 15, 39, 47). However, beyond the strict requirements to fulfill legal regulations, the commercial application of bacteriocins as beer additives is hindered mainly by low bacteriocin production yields and increases in production costs (44). Considering that Saccharomyces cerevisiae is commonly used as starter culture for brewing (24, 28, 35), a novel beer biopreservation strategy based on the development of bactericidal S. cerevisiae brewing strains has been proposed to overcome the aforementioned challenges (44, 46, 47). In this respect, the heterologous production of LAB bacteriocins, namely, pediocin PA-1 (PedPA-1) from Pediococcus acidilactici PAC1.0 and plantaricin 423 from Lactobacillus plantarum 423, by laboratory strains of S. cerevisiae has been reported (44, 46).Enterocin L50 (EntL50) is a commonly found bacteriocin composed of two highly related leaderless antimicrobial peptides, enterocin L50A (EntL50A) and enterocin L50B (EntL50B), which possesses a broad antimicrobial spectrum against LAB, food-borne pathogenic bacteria, and human and animal clinical pathogens (8, 9, 10, 11). Previous work by our group showed that EntL50 (EntL50A and EntL50B) may be used as a beer biopreservative to inhibit the growth of beer spoilage bacteria (1). Therefore, genetically engineered strains of S. cerevisiae heterologously expressing and secreting EntL50A and EntL50B have been developed in this work. For this purpose, we constructed the segregationally stable expression and secretion vector pYABD01, which allowed the secretion of biologically active EntL50A and EntL50B directed by MFα1_s through the S. cerevisiae Sec system.     

Structural Insights into Nox4 and Nox2: Motifs Involved in Function and Cellular Localization

Regulated generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is primarily accomplished by NADPH oxidases (Nox). Nox1 to Nox4 form a membrane-associated heterodimer with p22^phox, creating the docking site for assembly of the activated oxidase. Signaling specificity is achieved by interaction with a complex network of cytosolic components. Nox4, an oxidase linked to cardiovascular disease, carcinogenesis, and pulmonary fibrosis, deviates from this model by displaying constitutive H₂O₂ production without requiring known regulators. Extensive Nox4/Nox2 chimera screening was initiated to pinpoint structural motifs essential for ROS generation and Nox subcellular localization. In summary, a matching B loop was crucial for catalytic activity of both Nox enzymes. Substitution of the carboxyl terminus was sufficient for converting Nox4 into a phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-inducible phenotype, while Nox2-based chimeras never gained constitutive activity. Changing the Nox2 but not the Nox4 amino terminus abolished ROS generation. The unique heterodimerization of a functional Nox4/p22^phox Y121H complex was dependent on the D loop. Nox4, Nox2, and functional Nox chimeras translocated to the plasma membrane. Cell surface localization of Nox4 or PMA-inducible Nox4 did not correlate with O₂⁻ generation. In contrast, Nox4 released H₂O₂ and promoted cell migration. Our work provides insights into Nox structure, regulation, and ROS output that will aid inhibitor design.The family of NADPH oxidases consists of seven members termed Nox/Duox that differ in their tissue expression profiles, modes of activation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) outputs, and physiological functions. Understanding their distinguishing features is a prerequisite for rational inhibitor design and thus targeted intervention in ROS-mediated pathophysiologies (4). The coexpression of different Nox isoforms, each with potentially distinct functional profiles, in the same cell type necessitates a more discriminating approach than application of pan-Nox inhibitors. Detailed structure-function studies are necessary to identify unique regions and their impact with respect to catalytic function or localization of the enzyme. All Nox/Duox enzymes share a Nox backbone with six predicted transmembrane domains and an intracellular carboxyl-terminal domain which harbors FAD and NADPH binding sites. Nox5 and Duox1/2 enzymes contain additional structural elements such as amino terminal EF-hand motifs, a hallmark of their regulation by the intracellular calcium concentration (13, 30).The founding member of the NADPH oxidase family, the phagocyte oxidase, consists of membrane-bound Nox2 in a complex with the smaller subunit p22^phox (3). Heterodimerization of these two proteins is required for maturation and translocation of the enzyme complex to the plasma membrane or to intracellular vesicles. The Nox family members Nox1, Nox3, and Nox4 follow this paradigm (1, 14, 21, 25, 31). Heterodimer formation and association of the Nox/p22^phox complex at particular cellular membranes is essential for catalytic activity, i.e., for ROS generation. Nox2, and to a lesser degree Nox1 and Nox3, remain dormant under resting conditions and rely on stimulus-dependent translocation and assembly of oxidase components such as p47^phox and p67^phox, or NoxO1 and NoxA1 in the case of Nox1 and Nox3 (16). These steps, together with activation and translocation of the GTPase Rac, ultimately lead to the assembled, catalytically active oxidase and to ROS generation.Nox4 differs from the usual theme of multimeric assembly of active NADPH oxidases found in Nox1 to Nox3 (21, 22, 28, 32). Constitutive H₂O₂ production by Nox4 localized at perinuclear vesicles has been reported (1, 21, 28). Since NADPH oxidases catalyze the one-electron reduction of molecular oxygen to superoxide anion, the current dogma suggests that Nox4 generates intracellular superoxide. The superoxide produced will then dismutate rapidly to H₂O₂, diffusing from the cell into the extracellular milieu. Cytosolic proteins, which regulate the activity of Nox1 to Nox3 by binding to the carboxyl-terminal domains of Nox1 to Nox3, seem to be irrelevant for Nox4 function. The membrane-bound subunit p22^phox is to date the only known protein associated with Nox1 to Nox4. Heterodimerization, translocation, and enzymatic function of these oxidases require p22^phox. Recent structure-function analyses of complexes between Nox2 or Nox4 and the subunit p22^phox documented specific regions and amino acid residues in p22^phox necessary for complex formation and oxidase activity (35, 37). Interestingly, a p22^phox mutant (p22^phox Y121H) is capable of distinguishing between Nox1 to Nox3 and Nox4 by forming a functional complex only with Nox4, further suggesting unique structural features in Nox4 (35).In this study, we expand structure-function analysis of the oxidase complex by comparing Nox4/Nox2 chimeric enzymes with respect to NADPH oxidase activity, type of reactive oxygen species produced, requirement for additional oxidase components, and detailed subcellular localization.