Phylogenetic specificity of prolactin gene expression with conservation of Pit-1 function.

In mammals, the pituitary POU homeodomain protein, Pit-1, binds to proximal and distal 5'-flanking sequences of the PRL gene that dictate tissue-specific expression. These DNA sequences are highly conserved among mammals but are dramatically different from PRL 5' sequences in the teleost species, Oncorhynchus tschawytscha (chinook salmon). To analyze the molecular basis for pituitary-specific gene expression in a distantly related vertebrate, we transfected CAT reporter gene constructs containing 2.4 kilobases (kb) 5'-flanking sequence from the salmon PRL (sPRL) gene into various cell types. Expression of the sPRL gene was restricted to pituitary cells, but in rat pituitary GH4 cells levels of expression were at least 90-fold lower than those obtained with a -3 kb rat PRL (rPRL) construct. Conversely, in primary teleost pituitary cells, -2.4 kb sPRL/CAT was expressed at levels about 10-fold higher than -3 kb rPRL/CAT. To determine whether species-specific transactivation by Pit-1 was sufficient to explain these species differences in PRL gene expression, we isolated a cDNA clone encoding the salmon Pit-1 POU domain and constructed a rat Pit-1 expression vector that contained salmon Pit-1 POU domain sequences substituted in frame. The chimeric Pit-1 encoded 14 amino acids unique to salmon. Coexpression of rat Pit-1 with salmon or rat PRL/CAT in transfected HeLa cells resulted in specific and strikingly comparable levels of promoter activation. Moreover, the specificity and efficacy of the chimeric salmon/rat Pit-1 was similar to wild type rat Pit-1 in activating salmon and rat PRL/CAT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Estrogen-modulated estrogen receptor x Pit-1 protein complex formation and prolactin gene activation require novel protein synthesis

Both estrogen receptor (ER) and Pit-1 proteins are essential for the estrogen-activated expression of the rat prolactin gene. Our results show that ER.Pit-1 protein complex formation is reduced by estrogen in GH3 and PR1 rat pituitary tumor cells. In the latter, this decrease was blocked by cycloheximide, a protein synthesis inhibitor. On the other hand, the direct addition of estrogen to PR1 cell lysates had no effect on the formation of ER.Pit-1 complexes. Estrogen-activated prolactin gene expression was also inhibited by cycloheximide, suggesting that some form of protein synthesis is involved in ER.Pit-1 complex formation and subsequent prolactin gene activation. In support of this notion, we showed that estrogen-induced regulation of ER.Pit-1 complex formation could be transferred from cell lysates prepared from estrogen-treated PR1 cells to control cell lysates. This is not true for GH3 cells; instead, direct administration of estrogen to GH3 cell lysates readily abolished ER.Pit-1 protein complex formation in a dose-dependent manner, and such estrogen-induced regulation was blocked by the antiestrogen ICI 182,780. These findings thus indicate that 1) interaction between ER and Pit-1 proteins is estrogen-regulated in ways specific to different cell types, and 2) auxiliary protein factor synthesis may be involved in this process.