NF-��B in the Immune Response of Drosophila

The nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) pathways play a major role in Drosophila host defense. Two recognition and signaling cascades control this immune response. The Toll pathway is activated by Gram-positive bacteria and by fungi, whereas the immune deficiency (Imd) pathway responds to Gram-negative bacterial infection. The basic mechanisms of recognition of these various types of microbial infections by the adult fly are now globally understood. Even though some elements are missing in the intracellular pathways, numerous proteins and interactions have been identified. In this article, we present a general picture of the immune functions of NF-κB in Drosophila with all the partners involved in recognition and in the signaling cascades.The paramount roles of NF-κB family members in Drosophila development and host defense are now relatively well established and have been the subject of several in-depth reviews in recent years, including some from this laboratory (e.g., Hoffmann 2003; Minakhina and Steward 2006; Ferrandon et al. 2007; Lemaitre and Hoffmann 2007; Aggarwal and Silverman 2008). To avoid excessive duplication, we limit this text to the general picture that has evolved over nearly two decades—since the initial demonstration that the dorsal gene plays a role in dorsoventral patterning in embryogenesis of Drosophila and that it encodes a member of the NF-κB family of inducible transactivators (Nüsslein-Volhard et al. 1980; Steward 1987; Roth et al. 1989). In the early nineties, it became apparent that NF-κB also plays a role in the antimicrobial host defense of Drosophila (Engström et al. 1993; Ip et al. 1993; Kappler et al. 1993; Reichhart et al. 1993). We focus in this article on the immune functions of NF-κB and refer the reader to recent reviews for the roles of NF-κB in development (Roth 2003; Brennan and Anderson 2004; Moussian and Roth 2005; Minakhina and Steward 2006).The Drosophila genome codes for three NF-κB family members (Fig. 1). Dorsal and DIF (for dorsal-related immunity factor) are 70 kDa proteins, with a typical Rel homology domain, which is 45% identical to that of the mammalian counterparts c-Rel, Rel A, and Rel B. Dorsal and DIF lie some 10 kbp apart on the second chromosome and probably arose from a recent duplication (Meng et al. 1999). Both proteins are retained in the cytoplasm by binding to the same 54-kDa inhibitor protein Cactus, which is homologous to mammalian IκBs (Schüpbach and Wieshaus 1989; Geisler et al. 1992). The single Drosophila Cactus gene is closest to mammalian IκBα (Huguet et al. 1997). The third member of the family in Drosophila, Relish, is a 100-kDa protein with an amino-terminal Rel domain and a carboxy-terminal extension with typical ankyrin repeats, as found in Cactus and mammalian IκBs. Relish is similar to mammalian p100 and p105 and its activation requires proteolytic cleavage as in the case for these mammalian counterparts (reviewed in Hultmark 2003).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The NF-κB and IκB proteins in Drosophila. The length in amino acids is indicated by numbers. REL, Rel-homology domain; NLS, nuclear localization sequence; PEST, proline, glutamic acid, serine, and threonine-rich segment; Ac, acidic domain.Put in simple terms, NF-κB family members function in the host defense of Drosophila to control the expression of genes encoding immune-responsive peptides and proteins. Prominent among the induced genes are those encoding peptides with direct antimicrobial activity. To exert this function, Dorsal and DIF are translocated to the nucleus following stimulus-induced degradation of the inhibitor Cactus, whereas Relish requires stimulus-induced proteolytic cleavage for nuclear translocation of its amino-terminal Rel domain. This paradigm is similar to that observed in mammalian immunity. Again, for the sake of simplicity, we may say that the stimulus-induced degradation of Cactus, and the concomitant release of Dorsal or DIF, is primarily observed during Gram-positive bacterial and fungal infections and mediated by the Toll signaling pathway. In contrast, stimulus-induced proteolytic cleavage of Relish, and concomitant nuclear translocation of its amino-terminal Rel domain, is the hallmark of the response to Gram-negative bacterial infection and mediated by the Imd signaling pathway. Whether these pathways are also involved in the multifaceted defense against viruses remains an open question (Zambon et al. 2005). The Toll pathway was further shown to be involved in hematopoiesis of flies (Qiu et al. 1998). Of note, the Cactus-NF-κB module also plays a central role in the elimination of Plasmodium parasites in infected mosquitoes (Frolet et al. 2006). In the following, we review our information of the two established signaling pathways, Toll and Imd, which lead to gene reprogramming through NF-κB in response to bacterial and fungal infections. We first consider the upstream mechanisms that mediate the recognition of infection and allow for a certain level of discrimination between invading microorganisms. Gene reprogramming in this context is best illustrated by the induction of the antimicrobial peptide genes, which serve as the most convenient readouts of the antimicrobial defense of Drosophila (see Samakovlis et al. 1990; Reichhart et al. 1992; Ferrandon et al. 1998). Flies produce at least seven families of mostly cationic, small-sized, membrane-active peptides, with spectra variously directed against Gram-positive (defensins) and Gram-negative (diptericins, attacins, and drosocin) bacteria, and against fungi (drosomycins and metchnikowins), or with overlapping spectra (cecropins) (reviewed in Bulet et al. 1999; Hetru et al. 2003). The primary site of biosynthesis of these peptides is the fat body, a functional equivalent of the mammalian liver. Blood cells also participate in the production of antimicrobial peptides. As a rule, these molecules are secreted into the hemolymph where they reach remarkably high concentrations to oppose invading microorganisms (Hetru et al. 2003). This facet of the antimicrobial host defense is generally referred to as systemic immune response. Of note, the gut and the tracheae also produce antimicrobial peptides in response to microbes (see Tzou et al. 2000; Onfelt Tingvall et al. 2001; Liehl et al. 2006; Nehme et al. 2007).During infection, the Toll and Imd pathways control the expression of hundreds of genes. In addition to the antimicrobial peptides, these genes encode proteases, putative cytokines, cytoskeletal proteins, and many peptides and proteins whose function in the host defense are still not understood (De Gregorio et al. 2001; Irving et al. 2001).     

A cis-Proline in ��-Hemoglobin Stabilizing Protein Directs the Structural Reorganization of ��-Hemoglobin

α-Hemoglobin (αHb) stabilizing protein (AHSP) is expressed in erythropoietic tissues as an accessory factor in hemoglobin synthesis. AHSP forms a specific complex with αHb and suppresses the heme-catalyzed evolution of reactive oxygen species by converting αHb to a conformation in which the heme is coordinated at both axial positions by histidine side chains (bis-histidyl coordination). Currently, the detailed mechanism by which AHSP induces structural changes in αHb has not been determined. Here, we present x-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and mutagenesis data that identify, for the first time, the importance of an evolutionarily conserved proline, Pro³⁰, in loop 1 of AHSP. Mutation of Pro³⁰ to a variety of residue types results in reduced ability to convert αHb. In complex with αHb, AHSP Pro³⁰ adopts a cis-peptidyl conformation and makes contact with the N terminus of helix G in αHb. Mutations that stabilize the cis-peptidyl conformation of free AHSP, also enhance the αHb conversion activity. These findings suggest that AHSP loop 1 can transmit structural changes to the heme pocket of αHb, and, more generally, highlight the importance of cis-peptidyl prolyl residues in defining the conformation of regulatory protein loops.Mammalian adult hemoglobin (HbA)⁵ is a tetramer of two αHb and two βHb subunits, which is produced to extremely high concentrations (∼340 mg/ml) in red blood cells. Numerous mechanisms exist to balance and coordinate HbA synthesis in normal erythropoiesis, and problems with the production of either HbA subunit give rise to thalassemia, a common cause of anemia worldwide. Previously, we identified α-hemoglobin stabilizing protein (AHSP) as an accessory factor in normal HbA production (1). AHSP forms a dimeric complex with αHb (see Fig. 1A) (2) but does not interact with βHb or HbA. AHSP also binds heme-free (apo) αHb (3) and may serve functions in both the folding of nascent αHb (4) and the detoxification of excess αHb that remains following HbA assembly (2, 5). Mice carrying an Ahsp gene knock-out display mild anemia, ineffective erythropoiesis, and enhanced sensitivity to oxidative stress (1, 6), features also observed in β-thalassemia patients due to the cytotoxic effects of free αHb.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Summary of αHb·AHSP interactions. A, the αHb·AHSP complex(PDB code 1Z8U) (2). The interface is formed from helices 1 and 2 and the intervening loop 1 (green) of AHSP, together with helices G-H and the B-C corner of αHb (cyan). B, detailed views of the heme binding site of αHb as it appears in oxy-HbA (PDB code 1GZX) (69) and the final bis-histidyl αHb·AHSP complex (PDB code 1Z8U) with two histidine ligands to the iron. Typical visible absorption spectra in the region 450–700 nm are shown.Free αHb promotes the formation of harmful reactive oxygen species as a result of reduction/oxidation reactions involving the heme iron (7, 8). Reactive oxygen species can damage heme, αHb, and other cellular structures, resulting in hemoglobin precipitates and death of erythroid precursor cells (9–12). The presence of AHSP may explain how cells tolerate the slight excess of αHb that is observed in normal erythropoiesis, which is postulated to inhibit the formation of non-functional βHb tetramers, thus providing a robust mechanism for achieving the correct subunit stoichiometry during HbA assembly (13).Structural and biochemical studies have begun to elucidate the molecular mechanism by which AHSP detoxifies αHb. AHSP binds to oxygenated αHb to generate an initial complex that retains the oxy-heme, as evidenced by a characteristic visible absorption spectrum (see Fig. 1B, middle) and resonance Raman spectrum (5). This initial oxy-αHb·AHSP complex then converts to a low spin Fe³⁺ complex (2), in which the heme iron is bound at both axial positions by the side chains of His⁵⁸ and His⁸⁷ from αHb (see Fig. 1B, right). The formation of this complex inhibits αHb peroxidase activity and heme loss (2). Bis-histidyl heme coordination is becoming increasingly recognized as a feature of numerous vertebrate and non-vertebrate globins (14) and has been shown previously to confer a relative stabilization of the Fe³⁺ over the Fe²⁺ oxidation state (15–17). Although bis-histidyl heme coordination has previously been detected in solutions of met-Hb, formed through spontaneous autoxidation of Hb (18–21), the bishis-αHb·AHSP complex provides the first evidence that the bis-histidyl heme may play a positive functional role in Hb biochemistry by inhibiting the production of harmful reactive oxygen species.Despite its potential importance, the mechanism by which AHSP influences heme coordination in its binding partner is still unknown. As shown in Fig. 1A, AHSP binds αHb at a surface away from the heme pocket, and thus structural changes must somehow be transmitted through the αHb protein. It is intriguing that the free AHSP protein switches between two alternative conformations linked to cis/trans isomerization of the Asp²⁹-Pro³⁰ peptide bond in loop 1 (22) and that, in complex with αHb, this loop is located at the αHb·AHSP interface (see Fig. 1A). Peptide bonds preceding proline residues are unique in that the cis or trans bonding conformations have relatively similar stabilities (23), allowing an interconversion between these conformations that can be important for protein function (24, 25). Previous x-ray crystal structures of αHb·AHSP complexes have been obtained only with a P30A mutant of AHSP, in which isomerization is abolished and the Asp²⁹-Ala³⁰ peptide bond adopts a trans conformation, leaving the potential structural and functional significance of the evolutionarily conserved Pro³⁰ undisclosed. Here, we demonstrate a functional role for AHSP Pro³⁰ in conversion of oxy-αHb to the bis-histidyl form and identify a specific structural role for a cis Asp²⁹-Pro³⁰ peptide bond in this process. From a mechanistic understanding of how AHSP promotes formation of bis-histidyl αHb, we may eventually be able to engineer AHSP function as a tool in new treatments for Hb diseases such as β-thalassemia.     

Tumor Necrosis Factor �� Represses Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) Signaling by Interfering with the DNA Binding of Smads through the Activation of NF-��B

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) induce not only bone formation in vivo but also osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal cells in vitro. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibits both osteoblast differentiation and bone formation induced by BMPs. However, the molecular mechanisms of these inhibitions remain unknown. In this study, we found that TNFα inhibited the alkaline phosphatase activity and markedly reduced BMP2- and Smad-induced reporter activity in MC3T3-E1 cells. TNFα had no effect on the phosphorylation of Smad1, Smad5, and Smad8 or on the nuclear translocation of the Smad1-Smad4 complex. In p65-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts, overexpression of p65, a subunit of NF-κB, inhibited BMP2- and Smad-induced reporter activity in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, this p65-mediated inhibition of BMP2- and Smad-responsive promoter activity was restored after inhibition of NF-κB by the overexpression of the dominant negative IκBα. Although TNFα failed to affect receptor-dependent formation of the Smad1-Smad4 complex, p65 associated with the complex. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and electrophoresis mobility shift assays revealed that TNFα suppressed the DNA binding of Smad proteins to the target gene. Importantly, the specific NF-κB inhibitor, BAY11-7082, abolished these phenomena. These results suggest that TNFα inhibits BMP signaling by interfering with the DNA binding of Smads through the activation of NF-κB.     

Thioredoxin-independent Regulation of Metabolism by the ��-Arrestin Proteins

Thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip), originally characterized as an inhibitor of thioredoxin, is now known to be a critical regulator of glucose metabolism in vivo. Txnip is a member of the α-arrestin protein family; the α-arrestins are related to the classical β-arrestins and visual arrestins. Txnip is the only α-arrestin known to bind thioredoxin, and it is not known whether the metabolic effects of Txnip are related to its ability to bind thioredoxin or related to conserved α-arrestin function. Here we show that wild type Txnip and Txnip C247S, a Txnip mutant that does not bind thioredoxin in vitro, both inhibit glucose uptake in mature adipocytes and in primary skin fibroblasts. Furthermore, we show that Txnip C247S does not bind thioredoxin in cells, using thiol alkylation to trap the Txnip-thioredoxin complex. Because Txnip function was independent of thioredoxin binding, we tested whether inhibition of glucose uptake was conserved in the related α-arrestins Arrdc4 and Arrdc3. Both Txnip and Arrdc4 inhibited glucose uptake and lactate output, while Arrdc3 had no effect. Structure-function analysis indicated that Txnip and Arrdc4 inhibit glucose uptake independent of the C-terminal WW-domain binding motifs, recently identified as important in yeast α-arrestins. Instead, regulation of glucose uptake was intrinsic to the arrestin domains themselves. These data demonstrate that Txnip regulates cellular metabolism independent of its binding to thioredoxin and reveal the arrestin domains as crucial structural elements in metabolic functions of α-arrestin proteins.Thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip),³ an inhibitor of thioredoxin disulfide reductase activity in vitro (1–3), is robustly induced by glucose (4–6) and a critical regulator of metabolism in vivo (7–10). In humans, Txnip expression is suppressed by insulin and strongly up-regulated in diabetes (7). Txnip-deficient mice have fasting hypoglycemia and ketosis (8, 9, 11, 12) with a striking enhancement of glucose uptake by peripheral tissues (8, 9). We have proposed that Txnip inhibits thioredoxin by forming a mixed disulfide with thioredoxin at its catalytic active site cysteines in a disulfide exchange reaction (13). However, it is not known how Txnip metabolic functions relate to its ability to bind thioredoxin.Structurally, Txnip belongs to the arrestin superfamily of proteins (14). The prototypical arrestins (the visual arrestins and the β-arrestins) are key regulators of receptor signaling. The β-arrestins, named for their interaction with the β-adrenergic receptor, are now known to control signaling through the multiple families of receptors (15). These arrestin proteins have two wing-like arrestin domains arranged around a central core that detects and binds selectively to the charged phosphates of activated receptors (16). The arrestin domains then act as multifunctional scaffolds that cannot only quench receptor signals by recruiting endocytotic machinery and ubiquitin ligases, but also start new signal cascades (15). Recently, arrestin-β2 has also been shown to play a key role in metabolism as a controller of insulin receptor signaling that is deficient in diabetes (17).In addition to the classical visual/β-arrestins, a large number of arrestins more closely related to Txnip are present throughout multicellular evolution. These proteins have been termed the “α-arrestins,” as they are of more ancient origin than the visual/β family (14). Although no structures are known of the α-arrestins to date, they appear highly likely to share the overall fold: two β-sheet sandwich arrestin domains connected by a short linker sequence (14, 18). Confidence in this prediction has been enhanced by the surprising finding that the vps26 family of proteins, even more distantly related to the classical arrestins than Txnip, also share the arrestin fold (19). The vps26 proteins are a component of the retromer complex that controls retrograde transport of recycling endosomes to the trans-Golgi network. This functional overlap with visual/β-arrestin regulation of endocytosis suggests that control of endosome formation and transport may be a conserved function of the arrestin superfamily fold.The functions of the mammalian α-arrestins remain unclear. Humans have six α-arrestins: Txnip and five other proteins, which have been assigned the names Arrdc1–5 (arrestin domain-containing 1–5) (13). Very little is known about these other α-arrestins; thioredoxin binding is not conserved beyond Txnip (13, 20). More is known in yeast: recent reports suggest that α-arrestins function in regulation of endocytosis and protein ubiquitination through PXXY motifs in their C-terminal tails (21–25). However, as all the vertebrate α-arrestins have diverged from the ancestral α-arrestins (14), their structure-function relationships may differ from yeast α-arrestins.Given that other α-arrestins are not thioredoxin-binding proteins, we hypothesized that Txnip metabolic functions may be conserved in mammalian α-arrestins and independent of its interaction with thioredoxin. Overexpression of Txnip in vitro can decrease levels of available thioredoxin and increase levels of reactive oxygen species (1, 3, 26). However, in vivo studies of two different Txnip-deficient mouse models found no change in available thioredoxin levels (8, 27). Txnip reportedly binds to other proteins including Jab1 (28) and Dnajb5 (29), but it is not clear to what extent these interactions are themselves independent of a Txnip-thioredoxin complex (30).Using overexpression of a mutant Txnip that does not bind thioredoxin, we show here that a major metabolic function of Txnip, its inhibition of glucose uptake, does not require interaction with thioredoxin. Instead, we show that inhibition of glucose uptake is a conserved function of another human α-arrestin, Arrdc4. Studies of Txnip mutants and chimeric α-arrestins suggest that the metabolic functions of Txnip and Arrdc4 are intrinsic to the arrestin domains.