Matricellular Protein CCN3 (NOV) Regulates Actin Cytoskeleton Reorganization

CCN3 (NOV), a putative ligand for integrin receptors, is tightly associated with the extracellular matrix and mediates diverse cellular functions, including cell adhesion and proliferation. CCN3 has been shown to negatively regulate growth although it promotes migration in a cell type-specific manner. In this study, overexpression of CCN3 reduces growth and increases intercellular adhesion of breast cancer cells. Interestingly, CCN3 overexpression also led to the formation of multiple pseudopodia that are enriched in actin, CCN3, and vinculin. Breast cancer cells preincubated with exogenous CCN3 protein also induced the same phenotype, indicating that secreted CCN3 is sufficient to induce changes in cell morphology. Surprisingly, extracellular CCN3 is internalized to the early endosomes but not to the membrane protrusions, suggesting pseudopodia-enriched CCN3 may derive from a different source. The presence of an intracellular variant of CCN3 will be consistent with our finding that the cytoplasmic tail of the gap junction protein connexin43 (Cx43) associates with CCN3. Cx43 is a channel protein permitting intercellular communication to occur. However, neither the channel properties nor the protein levels of Cx43 are affected by the CCN3 protein. In contrast, CCN3 proteins are down-regulated in the absence of Cx43. Finally, we showed that overexpression of CCN3 increases the activity of the small GTPase Rac1, thereby revealing a pathway that links Cx43 directly to actin reorganization.The CCN (CYR61/Connective Tissue Growth Factor/Nephroblastoma Overexpressed) family of multimodular proteins mediates diverse cellular functions, including cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation (1–3). Overexpression of CCN3, one of the founding members of the family, inhibits proliferation in most types of tumors such as glioblastoma and Ewing sarcoma (4, 5). Similarly, down-regulation of CCN3 has been suggested to promote melanoma progression (6). On the other hand, CCN3 can also promote migration in sarcoma and glioblastoma (4, 7), although a separate study shows that it decreases the invasion of melanoma (6). Therefore, in contrast to its role in growth suppression, the role of CCN3 signaling in cell motility is less clear.Most evidence suggests CCN3 mediates its effects by binding to the integrin proteins, such as the αVβ3 receptors (8, 9), and that CCN3 alters cell adhesion in an integrin-dependent fashion (4, 10). In melanocytes, the discoidin domain receptor 1 mediates CCN3-dependent adhesion (11). CCN3 has also been observed to associate with Notch1 (12), fibulin 1C (13), S100A4 (14), and the gap junction protein Cx43³ (15, 16), suggesting that CCN3 may also modulate cell growth via non-integrin signaling pathways.Gap junction proteins are best known for forming channels between cells, contributing to intercellular communication by allowing the exchange of small ions and molecules (17, 18). Consequently, attenuated intercellular communication has been implicated in promoting carcinogenesis (19, 20). Recent evidence has indicated that connexins can mediate channel-independent growth control through interaction of their C-terminal cytoplasmic tail with various intracellular signaling molecules (21–23). In addition, many Cx43-interacting proteins, including ZO-1 (zonula occludens-1) (24), Drebrin (25), and N-cadherin (26) associate with F-actin, thus placing Cx43 in close proximity to the actin cytoskeleton.In this study, we show for the first time that CCN3 reorganizes the actin cytoskeleton of the breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 with the formation of multiple cell protrusions, possibly by activating the small GTPase Rac1. Our results also suggest an alternative route by which Cx43 may be functionally linked to actin cytoskeletal signaling via CCN3.     

The NOTCH signaling pathway in normal and malignant blood cell production

The NOTCH pathway is an evolutionarily conserved signalling network, which is fundamental in regulating developmental processes in invertebrates and vertebrates (Gazave et al. in BMC Evol Biol 9:249, 2009). It regulates self-renewal (Butler et al. in Cell Stem Cell 6:251–264, 2010), differentiation (Auderset et al. in Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 360:115–134, 2012), proliferation (VanDussen et al. in Development 139:488–497, 2012) and apoptosis (Cao et al. in APMIS 120:441–450, 2012) of diverse cell types at various stages of their development. NOTCH signalling governs cell-cell interactions and the outcome of such responses is highly context specific. This makes it impossible to generalize about NOTCH functions as it stimulates survival and differentiation of certain cell types, whereas inhibiting these processes in others (Meier-Stiegen et al. in PLoS One 5:e11481, 2010). NOTCH was first identified in 1914 in Drosophila and was named after the indentations (notches) present in the wings of the mutant flies (Bigas et al. in Int J Dev Biol 54:1175–1188, 2010). Homologs of NOTCH in vertebrates were initially identified in Xenopus (Coffman et al. in Science 249:1438–1441, 1990) and in humans NOTCH was first identified in T-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (T-ALL) (Ellisen et al. in Cell 66:649–61, 1991). NOTCH signalling is integral in neurogenesis (Mead and Yutzey in Dev Dyn 241:376–389, 2012), myogenesis (Schuster-Gossler et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:537–542, 2007), haematopoiesis (Bigas et al. in Int J Dev Biol 54:1175–1188, 2010), oogenesis (Xu and Gridley in Genet Res Int 2012:648207, 2012), differentiation of intestinal cells (Okamoto et al. in Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 296:G23–35, 2009) and pancreatic cells (Apelqvist et al. in Nature 400:877–881, 1999). The current review will focus on NOTCH signalling in normal and malignant blood cell production or haematopoiesis.     

Phospholamban phosphorylation,mutation, and structural dynamics: a biophysical approach to understanding and treating cardiomyopathy

We review the recent development of novel biochemical and spectroscopic methods to determine the site-specific phosphorylation, expression, mutation, and structural dynamics of phospholamban (PLB), in relation to its function (inhibition of the cardiac calcium pump, SERCA2a), with specific focus on cardiac physiology, pathology, and therapy. In the cardiomyocyte, SERCA2a actively transports Ca²⁺ into the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) during relaxation (diastole) to create the concentration gradient that drives the passive efflux of Ca²⁺ required for cardiac contraction (systole). Unphosphorylated PLB (U-PLB) inhibits SERCA2a, but phosphorylation at S16 and/or T17 (producing P-PLB) changes the structure of PLB to relieve SERCA2a inhibition. Because insufficient SERCA2a activity is a hallmark of heart failure, SERCA2a activation, by gene therapy (Andino et al. 2008; Fish et al. 2013; Hoshijima et al. 2002; Jessup et al. 2011) or drug therapy (Ferrandi et al. 2013; Huang 2013; Khan et al. 2009; Rocchetti et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2012), is a widely sought goal for treatment of heart failure. This review describes rational approaches to this goal. Novel biophysical assays, using site-directed labeling and high-resolution spectroscopy, have been developed to resolve the structural states of SERCA2a-PLB complexes in vitro and in living cells. Novel biochemical assays, using synthetic standards and multidimensional immunofluorescence, have been developed to quantitate PLB expression and phosphorylation states in cells and human tissues. The biochemical and biophysical properties of U-PLB, P-PLB, and mutant PLB will ultimately resolve the mechanisms of loss of inhibition and gain of inhibition to guide therapeutic development. These assays will be powerful tools for investigating human tissue samples from the Sydney Heart Bank, for the purpose of analyzing and diagnosing specific disorders.     

Investigating dynamic interdomain allostery in Pin1

Signaling proteins often sequester complementary functional sites in separate domains. How do the different domains communicate with one another? An attractive system to address this question is the mitotic regulator, human Pin1 (Lu et al., Nature 380:544–547, 1996). Pin-1 consists of two mutually tethered domains: a WW domain for substrate binding and a catalytic domain for peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase) activity. Pin1 accelerates the cis–trans isomerization of phospho-Ser/Thr-Pro (pS/T-P) motifs within proteins regulating the cell cycle and neuronal development. The early X-ray (Ranganathan et al., Cell 89:875–886, 1997; Verdecia et al., Nat Struct Biol 7:639–643, 2000) and solution NMR studies (Bayer et al., J Biol Chem 278:26183–26193, 2003; Jacobs et al., J Biol Chem 278:26174–26182, 2003) of Pin1 indicated inter- and intradomain motions. We have explored how such motions might affect interdomain communication, using NMR. Our accumulated results indicate substrate binding to Pin1 WW domain changes the intra/interdomain mobility, thereby altering substrate activity in the distal PPIase domain catalytic site. Thus, Pin1 shows evidence of dynamic allostery, in the sense of Cooper and Dryden (Eur J Biochem 11:103–109, 1984). We highlight our results supporting this conclusion and summarize them via a simple speculative model of conformational selection.     

Predicting stable functional peptides from the intergenic space of E. coli

Expression of synthetic proteins from intergenic regions of E. coli and their functional association was recently demonstrated (Dhar et al. in J Biol Eng 3:2, 2009. doi:10.1186/1754-1611-3-2). This gave birth to the question: if one can make ‘user-defined’ genes from non-coding genome—how big is the artificially translatable genome? (Dinger et al. in PLoS Comput Biol 4, 2008; Frith et al. in RNA Biol 3(1):40–48, 2006a; Frith et al. in PLoS Genet 2(4):e52, 2006b). To answer this question, we performed a bioinformatics study of all reported E. coli intergenic sequences, in search of novel peptides and proteins, unexpressed by nature. Overall, 2500 E. coli intergenic sequences were computationally translated into ‘protein sequence equivalents’ and matched against all known proteins. Sequences that did not show any resemblance were used for building a comprehensive profile in terms of their structure, function, localization, interactions, stability so on. A total of 362 protein sequences showed evidence of stable tertiary conformations encoded by the intergenic sequences of E. coli genome. Experimental studies are underway to confirm some of the key predictions. This study points to a vast untapped repository of functional molecules lying undiscovered in the non-expressed genome of various organisms.     

Fas-Mediated Apoptosis Is Regulated by the Extracellular Matrix Protein CCN1 (CYR61) In Vitro and In Vivo

Although Fas ligand (FasL) is primarily expressed by lymphoid cells, its receptor Fas (CD95/Apo-1) is broadly expressed in numerous nonlymphoid tissues and can mediate apoptosis of parenchymal cells upon injury and infiltration of inflammatory cells. Here we show that CCN1 (CYR61) and CCN2 (CTGF), matricellular proteins upregulated at sites of inflammation and wound repair, synergize with FasL to induce apoptosis by elevating cellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). CCN1 acts through engagement of integrin α₆β₁ and cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans, leading to ROS-dependent hyperactivation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in the presence of FasL to enhance mitochondrial cytochrome c release. We show that CCN1 activates neutral sphingomyelinase, which functions as a key source of CCN1-induced ROS critical for synergism with FasL. Furthermore, Fas-dependent hepatic apoptosis induced by an agonistic monoclonal anti-Fas antibody or intragastric administration of alcohol is severely blunted in knock-in mice expressing an apoptosis-defective Ccn1 allele. These results demonstrate that CCN1 is a physiologic regulator of Fas-mediated apoptosis and that the extracellular matrix microenvironment can modulate Fas-dependent apoptosis through CCN1 expression.Cell adhesion to several abundant extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins via engagement of integrin receptors is known to induce potent prosurvival signals, whereas detachment from the ECM triggers many cell types to undergo anoikis, a form of apoptotic cell death (13). This regulation of cell survival through integrin-mediated cell adhesion plays a critical role in controlling homeostasis and the integrity of tissue architecture, whereas unligated or inappropriately ligated integrins may elicit apoptotic signals (12). However, during embryogenesis, inflammation, tissue remodeling, and wound repair, death-inducing factors can provoke programmed or apoptotic death in normal cells without requiring their detachment from the ECM (4).Fas (CD95/APO-1) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family of cell surface death receptors that mediates apoptotic signals upon binding to its specific ligand, FasL. Ligation of Fas to FasL or its agonistic antibodies results in receptor clustering, recruitment of the adaptor protein FADD, and activation of the proteolytic caspase cascade (19, 50). Whereas FasL is primarily expressed in activated T lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and tissues of immune privilege, Fas is broadly expressed in most lymphoid and nonlymphoid tissues (50). Fas-mediated apoptosis is critical for the regulation of the immune response, including deletion of activated T and B lymphocytes, cell death-inducing activity of cytotoxic T cells, and removal of infiltrating lymphocytes in immune-privileged tissues (19, 50). Fas also plays an important role in parenchymal cell apoptosis in many organs during tissue injury and upon inflammatory infiltration of lymphocytes (7, 20, 38, 42, 46). Consistent with the notion that cell adhesion promotes cell survival, integrin-matrix interactions inhibit Fas-dependent apoptosis in a variety of cell types (22, 32). Thus, optimal apoptotic responses to Fas/FasL signaling in adherent parenchymal cells must override the cytoprotective effects of integrin-mediated cell adhesion. In these instances, dynamic changes in the ECM induced by inflammation or injury repair may establish conditions that are permissive of, or conducive to, the apoptotic responses to FasL.Recent studies have described the emergence of ECM proteins that can induce or promote apoptosis (49, 60, 65). Among them are members of the CCN family (9), which are secreted cysteine-rich proteins that serve regulatory rather than structural roles in the ECM and are therefore considered matricellular proteins (6). CCN1 (CYR61) and CCN2 (CTGF) support cell adhesion, stimulate cell migration, induce angiogenesis, and promote chondrogenic differentiation, exerting their functions primarily through direct binding to integrin receptors. CCN1 and CCN2 promote the survival of endothelial cells through integrin α_vβ₃ but induce apoptosis in p21-deficient fibroblasts through α₆β₁ via a caspase-8-independent mechanism (3, 40, 60). CCN1 and CCN2 are also critical for embryonic development, as Ccn1-null mice die during midgestation due to cardiovascular abnormalities and Ccn2-deficient mice perish perinatally as a consequence of severe skeletal malformations (29, 47, 48). In the adult, CCN proteins are highly expressed at sites of inflammation, injury repair, and tissue remodeling and are implicated in diseases where inflammation plays a role, including fibrosis, atherosclerosis, arthritis, and cancer (9). Furthermore, the presence of CCN1 in the ECM enables TNF-α to induce apoptotic death in normal cells without inhibition of NF-κB signaling or de novo protein synthesis, conditions thought to be necessary for TNF-α to be cytotoxic (10).Here we show that CCN1 and CCN2 can synergize with FasL and significantly enhance FasL-induced apoptosis in fibroblasts. Mechanistically, CCN1 engages integrin α₆β₁ and cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), leading to the reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent hyperactivation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in the presence of FasL, which greatly enhances mitochondrial cytochrome c release and apoptosis. We show that CCN1 is a novel activator of neutral sphingomyelinase (nSMase), which is an essential contributor to CCN1-induced ROS. Further, Fas-dependent hepatic cell death is greatly diminished in knock-in mice expressing an apoptosis-defective mutant of CCN1 that is unable to bind α₆β₁-HSPGs. Together, these results show that CCN1 is a physiologic regulator of Fas-mediated apoptosis and indicate that Fas-dependent cell death at sites of inflammation and injury repair may be controlled by the matrix microenvironment through CCN1 expression.     

Phosphorylation of the C Terminus of RHD3 Has a Critical Role in Homotypic ER Membrane Fusion in Arabidopsis

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) consists of dynamically changing tubules and cisternae. In animals and yeast, homotypic ER membrane fusion is mediated by fusogens (atlastin and Sey1p, respectively) that are membrane-associated dynamin-like GTPases. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), another dynamin-like GTPase, ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE3 (RHD3), has been proposed as an ER membrane fusogen, but direct evidence is lacking. Here, we show that RHD3 has an ER membrane fusion activity that is enhanced by phosphorylation of its C terminus. The ER network was RHD3-dependently reconstituted from the cytosol and microsome fraction of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cultured cells by exogenously adding GTP, ATP, and F-actin. We next established an in vitro assay system of ER tubule formation with Arabidopsis ER vesicles, in which addition of GTP caused ER sac formation from the ER vesicles. Subsequent application of a shearing force to this system triggered the formation of tubules from the ER sacs in an RHD-dependent manner. Unexpectedly, in the absence of a shearing force, Ser/Thr kinase treatment triggered RHD3-dependent tubule formation. Mass spectrometry showed that RHD3 was phosphorylated at multiple Ser and Thr residues in the C terminus. An antibody against the RHD3 C-terminal peptide abolished kinase-triggered tubule formation. When the Ser cluster was deleted or when the Ser residues were replaced with Ala residues, kinase treatment had no effect on tubule formation. Kinase treatment induced the oligomerization of RHD3. Neither phosphorylation-dependent modulation of membrane fusion nor oligomerization has been reported for atlastin or Sey1p. Taken together, we propose that phosphorylation-stimulated oligomerization of RHD3 enhances ER membrane fusion to form the ER network.In eukaryotic cells, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the organelle with the largest membrane area. The ER consists of an elaborate network of interconnected membrane tubules and cisternae that is continually moving and being remodeled (Friedman and Voeltz, 2011). In plant cells, ER movement and remodeling is primarily driven by the actin-myosin XI cytoskeleton (Sparkes et al., 2009; Ueda et al., 2010; Yokota et al., 2011; Griffing et al., 2014) and secondarily by the microtubule cytoskeleton (Hamada et al., 2014). Several factors involved in creating the ER architecture have been also identified (Anwar et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2012; Goyal and Blackstone, 2013; Sackmann, 2014; Stefano et al., 2014a; Westrate et al., 2015). Among them, ER membrane-bound GTPases, animal atlastins and yeast Sey1p (Synthetic Enhancement of Yop1), function as ER fusogens to form the interconnected tubular network (Hu et al., 2009; Orso et al., 2009; Anwar et al., 2012). Atlastin molecules on the two opposed membranes have been proposed to transiently dimerize to attract the two membranes to each other (Bian et al., 2011; Byrnes and Sondermann, 2011; Morin-Leisk et al., 2011; Moss et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2012; Byrnes et al., 2013). Closely attracted lipid bilayers are supposed to be destabilized by an amphipathic helical domain at the atlastin C terminus to facilitate membrane fusion (Bian et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2012; Faust et al., 2015). Knockdown of atlastins leads to fragmentation of the ER and unbranched ER tubules, while overexpression of atlastins enhances ER membrane fusion, which enlarges the ER profiles (Hu et al., 2009; Orso et al., 2009).An Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) protein, ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE3 (RHD3), has been proposed as a fusogen because (1) when it is disrupted, the ER network is modified into large cable-like strands of poorly branched membranes (Zheng et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2011; Stefano et al., 2012), (2) it shares sequence similarity with the above-mentioned fusogen Sey1p (Hu et al., 2009), and (3) it has structural similarity to atlastin and Sey1p, with a functional GTPase domain at the N-terminal cytosolic domain (Stefano et al., 2012) followed by two transmembrane domains and a cytosolic tail. RHD3 has a longer cytosolic C-terminal tail than do atlastin and Sey1p (Stefano and Brandizzi, 2014). It contains not only an amphipathic region but also a Ser/Thr-rich C terminus.Arabidopsis has two RHD3 isoforms called RHD3-Like 1 and RHD3-Like 2. Fluorescently tagged RHD3 and RHD3-Like 2 localize to the ER (Chen et al., 2011; Stefano et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2013). RHD3 and the two RHD3-Like proteins likely have redundant roles in ER membrane fusion (Zhang et al., 2013). Overexpression of either RHD3 or RHD3-Like 2 with a defective GTPase domain phenocopies the aberrant ER morphology in rhd3-deficient mutants (Chen et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2013).In this study, we show that the Ser/Thr-rich C terminus enhances ER membrane fusion following phosphorylation of its C terminus. We propose a model in which phosphorylation and oligomerization of RHD3 is required for efficient ER membrane fusion. Our findings clarify the mechanisms that regulate RHD3 and consequently the homeostasis of membrane fusion in the ER.     

SUGAR-INSENSITIVE3, a RING E3 Ligase,Is a New Player in Plant Sugar Response

Sugars, such as sucrose and glucose, have been implicated in the regulation of diverse developmental events in plants and other organisms. We isolated an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutant, sugar-insensitive3 (sis3), that is resistant to the inhibitory effects of high concentrations of exogenous glucose and sucrose on early seedling development. In contrast to wild-type plants, sis3 mutants develop green, expanded cotyledons and true leaves when sown on medium containing high concentrations (e.g. 270 mm) of sucrose. Unlike some other sugar response mutants, sis3 exhibits wild-type responses to the inhibitory effects of abscisic acid and paclobutrazol, a gibberellic acid biosynthesis inhibitor, on seed germination. Map-based cloning revealed that SIS3 encodes a RING finger protein. Complementation of the sis3-2 mutant with a genomic SIS3 clone restored sugar sensitivity of sis3-2, confirming the identity of the SIS3 gene. Biochemical analyses demonstrated that SIS3 is functional in an in vitro ubiquitination assay and that the RING motif is sufficient for its activity. Our results indicate that SIS3 encodes a ubiquitin E3 ligase that is a positive regulator of sugar signaling during early seedling development.Almost all living organisms rely on the products of plant photosynthesis for sustenance, either directly or indirectly. Carbohydrates, the major photosynthates, provide both energy and carbon skeletons for fungi, plants, and animals. In addition, sugars, such as Suc and Glc, function as signaling molecules to regulate plant growth, development, gene expression, and metabolic processes. Sugar response pathways are integrated with other signaling pathways, such as those for light, phytohormones, stress, and nitrogen (Dijkwel et al., 1997; Zhou et al., 1998; Roitsch, 1999; Arenas-Huertero et al., 2000; Huijser et al., 2000; Laby et al., 2000; Coruzzi and Zhou, 2001; Rook et al., 2001; Rolland et al., 2006).Several components of plant sugar response pathways have been identified based on the conservation of sugar-sensing mechanisms among eukaryotic cells (Rolland et al., 2001, 2006) or by mutant screens. Yeast HEXOKINASE2 functions in the Glc-mediated catabolite repression pathway (Entian, 1980). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutations in HEXOKINASE1 (HXK1) cause a Glc-insensitive phenotype, and HXK1 demonstrates dual functions in Glc sensing and metabolism (Moore et al., 2003; Cho et al., 2006). Recent studies revealed the involvement of G-protein-coupled receptor systems in sugar response in yeast and Arabidopsis (Chen et al., 2003; Lemaire et al., 2004). Arabidopsis regulator of G-protein signaling1 (rgs1) mutant seedlings are insensitive to 6% Glc (Chen and Jones, 2004), whereas G-protein α-subunit (gpa1) null mutant seedlings are hypersensitive to Glc (Chen et al., 2003). The SNF1/AMPK/SnRK1 protein kinases are postulated to be global regulators of energy control (Polge and Thomas, 2007). Studies conducted on two members of the Arabidopsis SnRK1 (for SNF1-Related Protein Kinases1) family, AKIN10 and AKIN11, have revealed their pivotal roles in stress and sugar signaling (Baena-González et al., 2007). A genetic screen for reduced seedling growth on 175 mm Suc identified the pleiotropic regulatory locus1 (prl1) mutant, which encodes a nuclear WD protein. Further analyses revealed that PRL1 functions in Glc and phytohormone responses (Németh et al., 1998). Interestingly, PRL1 negatively regulates the Arabidopsis SnRK1s AKIN10 and AKIN11 in vitro (Bhalerao et al., 1999).Isolation of additional mutants defective in sugar response has revealed cross talk between sugar and phytohormone response pathways. For example, abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis and signaling mutants have been isolated by several genetic screens for seedlings with reduced responses to the inhibitory effects of high levels of Suc or Glc on seedling development. These mutants include abscisic acid-deficient1 (aba1), aba2, aba3, salt-tolerant1/nine-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase3, abscisic acid-insensitive3 (abi3), and abi4 (Arenas-Huertero et al., 2000; Huijser et al., 2000; Laby et al., 2000; Rook et al., 2001; Cheng et al., 2002; Rolland et al., 2002; Huang et al., 2008), indicating interplay between ABA- and sugar-mediated signaling. Ethylene also exhibits interactions with sugars in controlling seedling development. Both the ethylene overproduction mutant eto1 and the constitutive ethylene response mutant ctr1 exhibit Glc (Zhou et al., 1998) and Suc (Gibson et al., 2001) insensitivity, whereas the ethylene-insensitive mutants etr1, ein2, and ein4 show sugar hypersensitivity (Zhou et al., 1998; Gibson et al., 2001; Cheng et al., 2002).Further characterization of sugar response factors has suggested that ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation may play a role in sugar response. In particular, the PRL1-binding domains of SnRK1s have been shown to recruit SKP1/ASK1, a conserved SCF ubiquitin ligase subunit, as well as the α4/PAD1 proteasomal subunit, indicating a role for SnRK1s in mediating proteasomal binding of SCF ubiquitin ligases (Farrás et al., 2001). In addition, recent studies indicate that PRL1 is part of a CUL4-based E3 ligase and that AKIN10 exhibits decreased rates of degradation in prl1 than in wild-type extracts (Lee et al., 2008). The ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway plays important roles in many cellular processes and signal transduction pathways in yeast, animals, and plants (Hochstrasser, 1996; Hershko and Ciechanover, 1998; Smalle and Vierstra, 2004). The key task of the pathway is to selectively ubiquitinate substrate proteins and target them for degradation by the 26S proteasome. In short, the multistep ubiquitination process starts with the formation of a thiol-ester linkage between ubiquitin and a ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1). The activated ubiquitin is then transferred to a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2), and a ubiquitin protein ligase (E3) then mediates the covalent attachment of ubiquitin to the substrate protein. The specificity of the pathway is largely realized by the E3s, which recognize the substrates that should be ubiquitinated. In Arabidopsis, more than 1,300 genes encode putative E3 subunits and the E3 ligases can be grouped into defined families based upon the presence of HECT (for Homology to E6-AP C Terminus), RING (for Really Interesting New Gene), or U-box domains (Smalle and Vierstra, 2004). The RING-type E3s can be subdivided into single-subunit E3s, which contain the substrate recognition and RING finger domains on the same protein, and multisubunit E3s, which include the SCF (for Skp1-Cullin-F-box), CUL3-BTB (for Broad-complex, Tramtrack, Bric-a-Brac), and APC (for Anaphase-Promoting Complex) complexes (Weissman, 2001; Moon et al., 2004).The Cys-rich RING finger was first described in the early 1990s (Freemont et al., 1991). It is defined as a linear series of conserved Cys and His residues (C3HC/HC3) that bind two zinc atoms in a cross-brace arrangement. RING fingers can be divided into two types, C3HC4 (RING-HC) and C3H2C3 (RING-H2), depending on the presence of either a Cys or a His residue in the fifth position of the motif (Lovering et al., 1993; Freemont, 2000). A recent study of the RING finger ubiquitin ligase family encoded by the Arabidopsis genome resulted in the identification of 469 predicted proteins containing one or more RING domains (Stone et al., 2005). However, the in vivo biological functions of all but a few of the RING proteins remain unknown. Recent studies have implicated several Arabidopsis RING proteins in a variety biological processes, including COP1 and CIP8 (photomorphogenesis; Hardtke et al., 2002; Seo et al., 2004), SINAT5 (auxin signaling; Xie et al., 2002), ATL2 (defense signaling; Serrano and Guzman, 2004), BRH1 (brassinosteroid response; Molnár et al., 2002), RIE1 (seed development; Xu and Li, 2003), NLA (nitrogen limitation adaptation; Peng et al., 2007), HOS1 (cold response; Dong et al., 2006), AIP2 (ABA signaling; Zhang et al., 2005), KEG (ABA signaling; Stone et al., 2006), and SDIR1 (ABA signaling; Zhang et al., 2007).Here, we report the isolation, identification, and characterization of an Arabidopsis mutant, sugar-insensitive3 (sis3), which is resistant to the early seedling developmental arrest caused by high exogenous sugar levels. The responsible locus, SIS3, was identified through a map-based cloning approach and confirmed with additional T-DNA insertional mutants and complementation tests. The SIS3 gene encodes a protein with a RING-H2 domain and three putative transmembrane domains. Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-SIS3 recombinant proteins exhibit in vitro ubiquitin E3 ligase activity. Together, these results indicate that a ubiquitination pathway involving the SIS3 RING protein is required to mediate the sugar response during early seedling development.     

A Calcium-Independent Activation of the Arabidopsis SOS2-Like Protein Kinase24 by Its Interacting SOS3-Like Calcium Binding Protein1

The salt stress-induced SALT-OVERLY-SENSITIVE (SOS) pathway in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) involves the perception of a calcium signal by the SOS3 and SOS3-like CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEIN8 (SCaBP8) calcium sensors, which then interact with and activate the SOS2 protein kinase, forming a complex at the plasma membrane that activates the SOS1 Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger. It has recently been reported that phosphorylation of SCaBP proteins by SOS2-like protein kinases (PKSs) stabilizes the interaction between the two proteins as part of a regulatory mechanism that was thought to be common to all SCaBP and PKS proteins. Here, we report the calcium-independent activation of PKS24 by SCaBP1 and show that activation is dependent on interaction of PKS24 with the C-terminal tail of SCaBP1. However, unlike what has been found for other PKS-SCaBP pairs, multiple amino acids in SCaBP1 are phosphorylated by PKS24, and this phosphorylation is dependent on the interaction of the proteins through the PKS24 FISL motif and on the efficient activation of PKS24 by the C-terminal tail of SCaBP1. In addition, we show that Thr-211 and Thr-212, which are not common phosphorylation sites in the conserved PFPF motif found in most SCaBP proteins, are important for this activation. Finally, we also found that SCaBP1-regulated PKS24 kinase activity is important for inactivating the Arabidopsis plasma membrane proton-translocating adenosine triphosphatase. Together, these results suggest the existence of a novel SCaBP-PKS regulatory mechanism in plants.Calcium is a ubiquitous second messenger that plays an important role in the regulation of plant growth and development. Many different types of calcium-binding proteins have been identified in plants (Harper et al., 2004), including the SALT-OVERLY-SENSITIVE3 (SOS3)-LIKE CALCIUM BINDING PROTEINS (SCaBPs; Liu and Zhu, 1998; Gong et al., 2004). Because the calcium-binding domain of these proteins shares sequence similarity with the yeast calcineurin B subunit, they have also been called CALCINEURIN B-LIKE PROTEINS (CBLs; Kudla et al., 1999; Luan et al., 2002). The founding member of this gene family, SOS3, was identified in a genetic screen from a salt-sensitive Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutant (Liu and Zhu, 1998). SCaBP/CBL proteins interact with the SOS2-LIKE PROTEIN KINASES (PKSs)/CBL-INTERACTING PROTEIN KINASES (CIPKs; Shi et al., 1999; Halfter et al., 2000; Guo et al., 2001). The genetic linkage between these two families was established after identification of SOS2 from a genetic screen similar to the one that identified the sos3 mutant (Liu et al., 2000). SOS3 interacts with SOS2 in vivo and in vitro and activates SOS2 in a calcium-dependent manner in vitro (Halfter et al., 2000). The SOS3-SOS2 complex further activates SOS1, a plasma membrane (PM) Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter, by directly phosphorylating the SOS1 C terminus (Shi et al., 2000; Qiu et al., 2002; Quintero et al., 2002, 2011; Yu et al., 2010).In addition to the calcium-dependent activation of PKSs by SCaBP calcium sensors, two other regulatory mechanisms have been identified for these protein families. First, PKSs have a conserved 21-amino acid peptide (FISL motif) in their regulatory domain that is necessary for efficient interaction with the SCaBP calcium sensors (Guo et al., 2001; Albrecht et al., 2001; Gong et al., 2004). The PKS regulatory domain interacts with its kinase domain via the FISL motif to repress PKS activity; interaction of SCaBP with the PKS FISL motif releases the kinase domain inhibition allowing for kinase activity (Guo et al., 2001; Gong et al., 2004). Second, the PKSs phosphorylate a Ser residue in the conserved C-terminal PFPF motif of the SCaBP proteins. This phosphorylation enhances the interaction between the two proteins and fully activates the complex (Lin et al., 2009; Du et al., 2011; Hashimoto et al., 2012).In this study, we identified a novel PKS activation mechanism involving the calcium-independent activation of PKS24 by SCaBP1 and show that it requires binding of SCaBP1 to the FISL motif of PKS24 and the involvement of two Thr residues in the SCaBP1 C-terminal tail.