Two Inactive Fragments of the Integral RNA Cooperate To Assemble Active Telomerase with the Human Protein Catalytic Subunit (hTERT) In Vitro

We have mapped the 5' and 3' boundaries of the region of the human telomerase RNA (hTR) that is required to produce activity with the human protein catalytic subunit (hTERT) by using in vitro assembly systems derived from rabbit reticulocyte lysates and human cell extracts. The region spanning nucleotides +33 to +325 of the 451-base hTR is the minimal sequence required to produce levels of telomerase activity that are comparable with that made with full-length hTR. Our results suggest that the sequence approximately 270 bases downstream of the template is required for efficient assembly of active telomerase in vitro; this sequence encompasses a substantially larger portion of the 3' end of hTR than previously thought necessary. In addition, we identified two fragments of hTR (nucleotides +33 to +147 and +164 to +325) that cannot produce telomerase activity when combined separately with hTERT but can function together to assemble active telomerase. These results suggest that the minimal sequence of hTR can be divided into two sections, both of which are required for de novo assembly of active telomerase in vitro.     

N-terminal domains of the human telomerase catalytic subunit required for enzyme activity in vivo

Most tumor cells depend upon activation of the ribonucleoprotein enzyme telomerase for telomere maintenance and continual proliferation. The catalytic activity of this enzyme can be reconstituted in vitro with the RNA (hTR) and catalytic (hTERT) subunits. However, catalytic activity alone is insufficient for the full in vivo function of the enzyme. In addition, the enzyme must localize to the nucleus, recognize chromosome ends, and orchestrate telomere elongation in a highly regulated fashion. To identify domains of hTERT involved in these biological functions, we introduced a panel of 90 N-terminal hTERT substitution mutants into telomerase-negative cells and assayed the resulting cells for catalytic activity and, as a marker of in vivo function, for cellular proliferation. We found four domains to be essential for in vitro and in vivo enzyme activity, two of which were required for hTR binding. These domains map to regions defined by sequence alignments and mutational analysis in yeast, indicating that the N terminus has also been functionally conserved throughout evolution. Additionally, we discovered a novel domain, DAT, that "dissociates activities of telomerase," where mutations left the enzyme catalytically active, but was unable to function in vivo. Since mutations in this domain had no measurable effect on hTERT homomultimerization, hTR binding, or nuclear targeting, we propose that this domain is involved in other aspects of in vivo telomere elongation. The discovery of these domains provides the first step in dissecting the biological functions of human telomerase, with the ultimate goal of targeting this enzyme for the treatment of human cancers.     

A human-Tetrahymena pseudoknot chimeric telomerase RNA reconstitutes a nonprocessive enzyme in vitro that is defective in telomere elongation

The phylogenetically-derived secondary structures of telomerase RNAs (TR) from ciliates, yeasts and vertebrates are surprisingly conserved and contain a pseudoknot domain at a similar location downstream of the template. As the pseudoknot domains of Tetrahymena TR (tTR) and human TR (hTR) mediate certain similar functions, we hypothesized that they might be functionally interchangeable. We constructed a chimeric TR (htTR) by exchanging the hTR pseudoknot sequences for the tTR pseudoknot region. The chimeric RNA reconstituted human telomerase activity when coexpressed with hTERT in vitro, but exhibited defects in repeat addition processivity and levels of DNA synthesis compared to hTR. Activity was dependent on tTR sequences within the chimeric RNA. htTR interacted with hTERT in vitro and dimerized predominantly via a region of its hTR backbone, the J7b/8a loop. Introduction of htTR in telomerase-negative cells stably expressing hTERT did not reconstitute an active enzyme able to elongate telomeres. Thus, our results indicate that the chimeric RNA reconstituted a weakly active nonprocessive human telomerase enzyme in vitro that was defective in telomere elongation in vivo. This suggests that there may be species-specific requirements for pseudoknot functions.