Dominant inhibitory Ras mutants selectively inhibit the activity of either cellular or oncogenic Ras.

Two dominant inhibitory Ras mutant proteins were analyzed by microinjection. One, [Asn-17]Ras, had a substitution in the putative Mg(2+)-binding site of Ha-Ras. The other, RAST, had a mutation in a yeast RAS protein that impaired its GTPase activity and increased its affinity for GAP. RAST also had a mutation that blocked its localization to the plasma membrane. In NIH 3T3 cells [Asn-17]Ras inhibited the function of normal Ras much more efficiently than that of oncogenic Ras. In contrast, RAST interfered with the transforming activity of oncogenic Ras more efficiently than that of normal Ras. These conclusions were based on two separate types of analysis. The inhibitory Ras mutant proteins were first microinjected into cells stably transformed either by oncogenic Ras or by high levels of expression of cellular Ras. Results obtained in stably transformed cells were then verified by coinjection of the inhibitory Ras mutant proteins together with transforming concentrations of either oncogenic or normal Ras protein. Whereas RAST was active in soluble form. [Asn-17]Ras required membrane localization for activity. Furthermore, mutations in the GAP/effector-binding domain reduced or eliminated the inhibitory activity of RAST but had no detectable effect on [Asn-17]Ras. These results are consistent with the possibility that [Asn-17]Ras functions by blocking the activation of endogenous Ras proteins, while RAST functions by blocking the ability of activated Ras to stimulate a downstream target within the cells. The properties of RAST suggest that interference with the GAP/effector-binding function of RAS represents a strategy for the preferential inactivation of oncogenic Ras in cells.     

Identification of residues critical for Ras(17N) growth-inhibitory phenotype and for Ras interaction with guanine nucleotide exchange factors.

The Ras(17N) dominant negative antagonizes endogenous Ras function by forming stable, inactive complexes with Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs; e.g., SOS1). We have used the growth-inhibitory phenotype of Ras(17N) to characterize two aspects of Ras interaction with GEFs. First, we used a nonprenylated version of Ras(17N), designated Ras(17N/186S), which no longer associates with the plasma membrane and lacks the growth-inhibitory phenotype, to address the importance of Ras subcellular location and posttranslational modification for its interaction with GEFs. We observed that addition of an N-terminal myristylation signal to Ras(17N/186S) restored the growth-inhibitory activity of nonprenylated Ras(17N). Thus, membrane association, rather than prenylation, is critical for Ras interaction with Ras GEFs. Second, we used a biological selection approach to identify Ras residues which are critical for Ras(17N) growth inhibition and hence for interaction with Ras GEFs. We identified mutations at residues 75, 76, and 78 that abolished the growth-inhibitory activity of Ras(17N). Since GEF interaction is dispensable for oncogenic but not normal Ras function, our demonstration that single-amino-acid substitutions at these three positions impaired the transforming activity of normal but not oncogenic Ras provides further support for the role of these residues in Ras-GEF interactions. Finally, Ras(WT) proteins with mutations at these residues were no longer activated by mammalian SOS1. Altogether, these results suggest that the Ras intracellular location and Ras residues 75 to 78 are critical for Ras-GEF interaction.     

The membrane localization of Ras2p and the association between Cdc25p and Ras2-GTP are regulated by protein kinase A (PKA) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ras2p has been suggested to be a target in the feedback regulation of Ras-cAMP pathway. This work proves that the Ras2p localization is regulated by PKA activity, and that PKA down-regulates Ras2p activity and the protein association between Cdc25p and Ras2-GTP, which is due to a reduced Ras2-GEF Cdc25p activity. These results suggest that Ras2p localization and Ras2-GEF activity of Cdc25p play roles in the feedback regulation of Ras2p in the Ras-cAMP pathway.     

Kinases KISS and tell

The Ras oncoprotein is a key driver of cancer. However, Ras also provokes senescence, which serves as a major barrier to Ras-driven transformation. Ras senescence pathways remain poorly characterized. NORE1A is a novel Ras effector that serves as a tumor suppressor. It is frequently inactivated in tumors. We show that NORE1A is a powerful Ras senescence effector and that down-regulation of NORE1A suppresses senescence induction by Ras and enhances Ras transformation. We show that Ras induces the formation of a complex between NORE1A and the kinase HIPK2, enhancing HIPK2 association with p53. HIPK2 is a tumor suppressor that can induce either proapoptotic or prosenescent posttranslational modifications of p53. NORE1A acts to suppress its proapoptotic phosphorylation of p53 but enhance its prosenescent acetylation of p53. Thus, we identify a major new Ras signaling pathway that links Ras to the control of specific protein acetylation and show how NORE1A allows Ras to qualitatively modify p53 function to promote senescence.     

Spatial Segregation of Ras Signaling—New Evidence from Fission Yeast

The Ras GTPases act as binary switches for signal transduction pathways that are important for growth regulation and tumorigenesis. Despite the biochemical simplicity of this switch, Ras proteins control multiple pathways, and the functions of the four mammalian Ras proteins are not overlapping. This raises an important question—how does a Ras protein selectively regulate a particular activity? One recently emerging model suggests that a single Ras protein can control different functions by acting in distinct cellular compartments. A critical test of this model is to identify pathways that are selectively controlled by Ras when it is localized to a particular compartment. A recent study has examined Ras signaling in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, which expresses only one Ras protein that controls two separate evolutionarily conserved pathways. This study demonstrates that whereas Ras localized to the plasma membrane selectively regulates a MAP kinase pathway to mediate mating pheromone signaling, Ras localized to the endomembrane activates a Cdc42 pathway to mediate cell polarity and protein trafficking. This study has provided unambiguous evidence for compartmentalized signaling of Ras.     

Identification and characterization of rain, a novel Ras-interacting protein with a unique subcellular localization

The Ras small GTPase functions as a signaling node and is activated by extracellular stimuli. Upon activation, Ras interacts with a spectrum of functionally diverse downstream effectors and stimulates multiple cytoplasmic signaling cascades that regulate cellular proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. In addition to the association of Ras with the plasma membrane, recent studies have established an association of Ras with Golgi membranes. Whereas the effectors of signal transduction by activated, plasma membrane-localized Ras are well characterized, very little is known about the effectors used by Golgi-localized Ras. In this study, we report the identification of a novel Ras-interacting protein, Rain, that may serve as an effector for endomembrane-associated Ras. Rain does not share significant sequence similarity with any known mammalian proteins, but contains a Ras-associating domain that is found in RalGDS, AF-6, and other characterized Ras effectors. Rain interacts with Ras in a GTP-dependent manner in vitro and in vivo, requires an intact Ras core effector-binding domain for this interaction, and thus fits the definition of a Ras effector. Unlike other Ras effectors, however, Rain is localized to perinuclear, juxta-Golgi vesicles in intact cells and is recruited to the Golgi by activated Ras. Finally, we found that Rain cooperates with activated Raf and causes synergistic transformation of NIH3T3 cells. Taken together, these observations support a role for Rain as a novel protein that can serve as an effector of endomembrane-localized Ras.     

Structural analysis of autoinhibition in the Ras activator Son of sevenless

The classical model for the activation of the nucleotide exchange factor Son of sevenless (SOS) involves its recruitment to the membrane, where it engages Ras. The recent discovery that Ras*GTP is an allosteric activator of SOS indicated that the regulation of SOS is more complex than originally envisaged. We now present crystallographic and biochemical analyses of a construct of SOS that contains the Dbl homology-pleckstrin homology (DH-PH) and catalytic domains and show that the DH-PH unit blocks the allosteric binding site for Ras and suppresses the activity of SOS. SOS is dependent on Ras binding to the allosteric site for both a lower level of activity, which is a result of Ras*GDP binding, and maximal activity, which requires Ras*GTP. The action of the DH-PH unit gates a reciprocal interaction between Ras and SOS, in which Ras converts SOS from low to high activity forms as Ras*GDP is converted to Ras*GTP by SOS.     

Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S disrupts Ras-mediated signal transduction by inhibiting guanine nucleotide exchange factor-catalyzed nucleotide exchange.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S double ADP-ribosylates Ras at Arg(41) and Arg(128). Since Arg(41) is adjacent to the switch 1 region of Ras, ADP-ribosylation could interfere with Ras-mediated signal transduction via several mechanisms, including interaction with Raf, or guanine nucleotide exchange factor-stimulated or intrinsic nucleotide exchange. Initial experiments showed that ADP-ribosylated Ras (ADP-r-Ras) and unmodified Ras (Ras) interacted with Raf with equal efficiencies, indicating that ADP-ribosylation did not interfere with Ras-Raf interactions. While ADP-r-Ras and Ras possessed equivalent intrinsic nucleotide exchange rates, guanine nucleotide exchange factor (Cdc25) stimulated the nucleotide exchange of ADP-r-Ras at a 3-fold slower rate than Ras. ADP-r-Ras did not affect the nucleotide exchange of Ras, indicating that the ADP-ribosylation of Ras was not a dominant negative phenotype. Ras-R41K and ADP-r-Ras R41K possessed similar exchange rates as Ras, indicating that ADP-ribosylation at Arg(128) did not inhibit Cdc25-stimulated nucleotide exchange. Consistent with the slower nucleotide exchange rate of ADP-r-Ras as compared with Ras, ADP-r-Ras bound its guanine nucleotide exchange factor (Cdc25) less efficiently than Ras in direct binding experiments. Together, these data indicate that ADP-ribosylation of Ras at Arg(41) disrupts Ras-Cdc25 interactions, which inhibits the rate-limiting step in Ras signal transduction, the activation of Ras by its guanine nucleotide exchange factor.     

Elucidation of binding determinants and functional consequences of Ras/Raf-cysteine-rich domain interactions

Raf-1 is a critical downstream target of Ras and contains two distinct domains that bind Ras. The first Ras-binding site (RBS1) in Raf-1 has been shown to be essential for Ras-mediated translocation of Raf-1 to the plasma membrane, whereas the second site, in the Raf-1 cysteine-rich domain (Raf-CRD), has been implicated in regulating Raf kinase activity. While recognition elements that promote Ras.RBS1 complex formation have been characterized, relatively little is known about Ras/Raf-CRD interactions. In this study, we have characterized interactions important for Ras binding to the Raf-CRD. Reconciling conflicting reports, we found that these interactions are essentially independent of the guanine nucleotide bound state, but instead, are enhanced by post-translational modification of Ras. Specifically, our findings indicate that Ras farnesylation is sufficient for stable association of Ras with the Raf-CRD. Furthermore, we have also identified a Raf-CRD variant that is impaired specifically in its interactions with Ras. NMR data also suggests that residues proximal to this mutation site on the Raf-CRD form contacts with Ras. This Raf-CRD mutant impairs the ability of Ras to activate Raf kinase, thereby providing additional support that Ras interactions with the Raf-CRD are important for Ras-mediated activation of Raf-1.     

The dominant negative Ras mutant, N17Ras, can inhibit signaling independently of blocking Ras activation

Ras plays an important role in a variety of cellular functions, including growth, differentiation, and oncogenic transformation. For instance, Ras participates in the activation of Raf, which phosphorylates and activates mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), which then phosphorylates and activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), a mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase. Activation of MAP kinase appears to be essential for propagating a wide variety of extracellular signals from the plasma membrane to the nucleus. N17Ras, a GDP-bound dominant negative mutant, is used widely as an interfering mutant to assess Ras function in vivo. Surprisingly, we observed that expression of N17Ras inhibited the activity and phosphorylation of Elk-1, a physiological substrate of MAP kinases, in response to phorbol myristate acetate. The activity and phosphorylation of the MAP kinase hemagglutinin epitope (HA)-ERK1 were not affected by N17Ras in response to the same stimulus. Additionally, expression of N17Ras, but not L61S186Ras, a GTP-bound interfering mutant, inhibited MEK-induced Elk-1 phosphorylation, suggesting that inhibition of Elk-1 may be unique to GDP-bound Ras mutants. Finally, we observed that V12Ras-induced focus formation in NIH3T3 cells is inhibited by coexpression of GDP-bound Ras mutants, such as N17, A15, and N17N69. Therefore, N17Ras and V12 Ras may be codominant with respect to Elk-1 activation and cellular transformation. These results indicate that N17Ras appears to have at least two distinguishable functions: interference with endogenous Ras activation and inhibition of Elk-1 and transfomation. Furthermore, our data imply the possibility that GDP-bound Ras, like N17Ras, may have a direct role in signal transduction.     

Ras signals principally via Erk in G1 but cooperates with PI3K/Akt for Cyclin D induction and S-phase entry

Numerous studies exploring oncogenic Ras or manipulating physiological Ras signalling have established an irrefutable role for Ras as driver of cell cycle progression. Despite this wealth of information the precise signalling timeline and effectors engaged by Ras, particularly during G1, remain obscure as approaches for Ras inhibition are slow-acting and ill-suited for charting discrete Ras signalling episodes along the cell cycle. We have developed an approach based on the inducible recruitment of a Ras-GAP that enforces endogenous Ras inhibition within minutes. Applying this strategy to inhibit Ras stepwise in synchronous cell populations revealed that Ras signaling was required well into G1 for Cyclin D induction, pocket protein phosphorylation and S-phase entry, irrespective of whether cells emerged from quiescence or G2/M. Unexpectedly, Erk, and not PI3K/Akt or Ral was activated by Ras at mid-G1, albeit PI3K/Akt signalling was a necessary companion of Ras/Erk for sustaining cyclin-D levels and G1/S transition. Our findings chart mitogenic signaling by endogenous Ras during G1 and identify limited effector engagement restricted to Raf/MEK/Erk as a cogent distinction from oncogenic Ras signalling.     

Roles of Ras1 membrane localization during Candida albicans hyphal growth and farnesol response

Many Ras GTPases localize to membranes via C-terminal farnesylation and palmitoylation, and localization regulates function. In Candida albicans, a fungal pathogen of humans, Ras1 links environmental cues to morphogenesis. Here, we report the localization and membrane dynamics of Ras1, and we characterize the roles of conserved C-terminal cysteine residues, C287 and C288, which are predicted sites of palmitoylation and farnesylation, respectively. GFP-Ras1 is localized uniformly to plasma membranes in both yeast and hyphae, yet Ras1 plasma membrane mobility was reduced in hyphae compared to that in yeast. Ras1-C288S was mislocalized to the cytoplasm and could not support hyphal development. Ras1-C287S was present primarily on endomembranes, and strains expressing ras1-C287S were delayed or defective in hyphal induction depending on the medium used. Cells bearing constitutively activated Ras1-C287S or Ras1-C288S, due to a G13V substitution, showed increased filamentation, suggesting that lipid modifications are differentially important for Ras1 activation and effector interactions. The C. albicans autoregulatory molecule, farnesol, inhibits Ras1 signaling through adenylate cyclase and bears structural similarities to the farnesyl molecule that modifies Ras1. At lower concentrations of farnesol, hyphal growth was inhibited but Ras1 plasma membrane association was not altered; higher concentrations of farnesol led to mislocalization of Ras1 and another G protein, Rac1. Furthermore, farnesol inhibited hyphal growth mediated by cytosolic Ras1-C288SG13V, suggesting that farnesol does not act through mechanisms that depend on Ras1 farnesylation. Our findings imply that Ras1 is farnesylated and palmitoylated, and that the Ras1 stimulation of adenylate cyclase-dependent phenotypes can occur in the absence of these lipid modifications.     

Specific isoprenoid modification is required for function of normal, but not oncogenic, Ras protein.

While the Ras C-terminal CAAX sequence signals modification by a 15-carbon farnesyl isoprenoid, the majority of isoprenylated proteins in mammalian cells are modified instead by a 20-carbon geranylgeranyl moiety. To determine the structural and functional basis for modification of proteins by a specific isoprenoid group, we have generated chimeric Ras proteins containing C-terminal CAAX sequences (CVLL and CAIL) from geranylgeranyl-modified proteins and a chimeric Krev-1 protein containing the H-Ras C-terminal CAAX sequence (CVLS). Our results demonstrate that both oncogenic Ras transforming activity and Krev-1 antagonism of Ras transforming activity can be promoted by either farnesyl or geranylgeranyl modification. Similarly, geranylgeranyl-modified normal Ras [Ras(WT)CVLL], when overexpressed, exhibited the same level of transforming activity as the authentic farnesyl-modified normal Ras protein. Therefore, farnesyl and geranylgeranyl moieties are functionally interchangeable for these biological activities. In contrast, expression of moderate levels of geranylgeranyl-modified normal Ras inhibited the growth of untransformed NIH 3T3 cells. This growth inhibition was overcome by coexpression of the mutant protein with oncogenic Ras or Raf, but not with oncogenic Src or normal Ras. The similar growth-inhibiting activities of Ras(WT)CVLL and the previously described Ras(17N) dominant inhibitory mutant suggest that geranylgeranyl-modified normal Ras may exert its growth-inhibiting action by perturbing endogenous Ras function. These results suggest that normal Ras function may specifically require protein modification by a farnesyl, but not a geranylgeranyl, isoprenoid.     

Ras-induced cellular events (review)

Ras is a crucial regulator of cell growth in eukaryotic cells. Activated Ras can stimulate signal transduction cascades, leading to cell proliferation, differentiation or apoptosis. It is also one of the most commonly mutated genes in both solid tumours and haematologic neoplasias. In leukaemia and tumours, aberrant Ras signalling can be induced directly by Ras mutation or indirectly by altering genes that associate with Ras or its signalling pathways. A requisite for Ras function is localization to the plasma membrane, which is induced by the post-translational modification farnesylation. Molecules that interfere with this Ras modification have been used as antitumour agents. Ras is emerging as a dual regulator of cell functions, playing either positive or negative roles in the control of proliferation or apoptosis. The diversity of Ras-mediated effects may be related in part to the differential involvement of Ras homologues in distinct cellular processes or to the expanding array of Ras effectors.     

Src tyrosine kinase-induced loss of luteinizing hormone responsiveness is via a Ras-dependent,phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase independent pathway

Gonadotropins stimulate gonadal cell steroid secretion primarily through activation of a cAMP-protein kinase A signal transduction pathway. Various growth factors have been shown to inhibit gonadotropin-stimulated steroidogenesis, however, the intracellular signaling cascades involved in growth factor inhibition have not been characterized. The present study investigated whether Src tyrosine kinase, a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase activated in response to growth factor stimulation and previously shown to inhibit LH-stimulated progesterone secretion, acts via activation of Ras stimulated pathways, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3-kinase) stimulated pathways, or both in MA10 Leydig cells. Direct activation of Src in MA10 cells that express a temperature sensitive Src was associated with an increase in GTP-bound Ras, indicating increased Ras activity in response to Src activation. Direct activation of Ras by way of expression of a constitutively active Ras (Ras+) was associated with a decrease in LH responsiveness. Coexpression of a dominant negative Src, which by itself increases LH responsiveness in MA10 cells, had no effect on Ras+ inhibition on LH responsiveness, further demonstrating that Src is upstream of Ras. In addition, MA10(Ras+) cells were relatively unresponsive to cholera toxin or 8-bromo cAMP, indicating the effects of Ras are independent of cAMP generation. Wortmannin, a PI3-kinase inhibitor, did not restore LH responsiveness to cells expressing activated Src or constitutively active Ras. These results demonstrate that Src activates a Ras pathway in MA10 Leydig cells, and that activation of Ras is associated with a loss of LH responsiveness that is independent of PI3-kinase.     

The activation of RalGDS can be achieved independently of its Ras binding domain. Implications of an activation mechanism in Ras effector specificity and signal distribution.

Small GTPases of the Ras family are major players of signal transduction in eukaryotic cells. They receive signals from a number of receptors and transmit them to a variety of effectors. The distribution of signals to different effector molecules allows for the generation of opposing effects like proliferation and differentiation. To understand the specificity of Ras signaling, we investigated the activation of RalGDS, one of the Ras effector proteins with guanine-nucleotide exchange factor activity for Ral. We determined the GTP level on RalA and showed that the highly conserved Ras binding domain (RBD) of RalGDS, which mediates association with Ras, is important but not sufficient to explain the stimulation of the exchange factor. Although a point mutation in the RBD of RalGDS, which abrogates binding to Ras, renders RalGDS independent to activated Ras, an artificially membrane-targeted version of RalGDS lacking its RBD could still be activated by Ras. The switch II region of Ras is involved in the activation, because the mutant Y64W in this region is impaired in the RalGDS activation. Furthermore, it is shown that Rap1, which was originally identified as a Ras antagonist, can block Ras-mediated RalGDS signaling only when RalGDS contains an intact RBD. In addition, kinetic studies of the complex formation between RalGDS-RBD and Ras suggest that the fast association between RalGDS and Ras, which is analogous to the Ras/Raf case, achieves signaling specificity. Conversely, the Ras x RalGDS complex has a short lifetime of 0.1 s and Rap1 forms a long-lived complex with RalGDS, possibly explaining its antagonistic effect on Ras.     

Ras interaction with the GTPase-activating protein (GAP)

Biologically active forms of Ras complexed to GTP can bind to the GTPase-activating protein (GAP), which has been implicated as possible target of Ras in mammalian cells. In order to study the structural features of Ras required for this interaction, we have evaluated a series of mutant ras proteins for the ability to bind GAP and a series of Ras peptides for the ability to interfere with this interaction. Point mutations in the putative effector region of Ras (residues 32-40) that inhibit biological activity also impair Ras binding to GAP. An apparent exception is the Thr to Ser substitution at residue 35; [Ser-35]Ras binds to GAP as effectively as wild-type Ras even though this mutant is biologically weak in both mammalian and S. cerevisiae cells. In vitro, [Ser-35]Ras can also efficiently stimulate the S. cerevisiae target of Ras, adenylyl cyclase, indicating that other factors may influence Ras/protein interactions in vivo. Peptides having Ras residues 17-44 and 17-32 competed with the binding of Ras to E. coli-expressed GAP with IC50 values of 2.4 and 0.9 microM, respectively, whereas Ras peptide 17-26 was without effect up to 400 microM. A related peptide from the yeast GTP-binding protein YPT1 analogous to Ras peptide 17-32 competed with an IC50 value of 19 microM even though the YPT1 protein itself is unable to bind to GAP. These results suggest that determinants within Ras peptide 17-32 may be important for Ras binding to GAP.     

Ras-induced cellular events

Ras is a crucial regulator of cell growth in eukaryotic cells. Activated Ras can stimulate signal transduction cascades, leading to cell proliferation, differentiation or apoptosis. It is also one of the most commonly mutated genes in both solid tumours and haematologic neoplasias. In leukaemia and tumours, aberrant Ras signalling can be induced directly by Ras mutation or indirectly by altering genes that associate with Ras or its signalling pathways. A requisite for Ras function is localization to the plasma membrane, which is induced by the post-translational modification farnesylation. Molecules that interfere with this Ras modification have been used as antitumour agents. Ras is emerging as a dual regulator of cell functions, playing either positive or negative roles in the control of proliferation or apoptosis. The diversity of Ras-mediated effects may be related in part to the differential involvement of Ras homologues in distinct cellular processes or to the expanding array of Ras effectors.