Overexpressed phytochrome C has similar photosensory specificity to phytochrome B but a distinctive capacity to enhance primary leaf expansion

Phytochrome C (phyC) is a low-abundance member of the five-membered phytochrome family of photoreceptors in Arabidopsis. Towards developing an understanding of the photosensory and physiological functions of phyC, transgenic Arabidopsis plants were generated that overexpress cDNA-encoded phyC and seedling responses to continuous white, red, or far-red light (Wc, Rc or FRc, respectively) were examined. Transgenic seedlings overexpressing phyC displayed enhanced inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in Rc, but were unchanged in responsiveness to FRc relative to wild-type. These data indicate that phyC has photosensory specificity that is similar to that of phyB and thus distinct from that of phyA. phyC overexpressors with levels only 3 to 4 times the level of endogenous phyC exhibited enhanced primary leaf expansion in Wc. This is in contrast to phyA or phyB overexpressors which respectively have levels that are 500-and 100-fold that of overexpressed phyC but showed no enhancement of primary leaf expansion. Therefore, phyC may have some physiological roles that are different to those of phyA and phyB in the control of seedling responses to light signals.     

Distinct and cooperative functions of phytochromes A, B, and C in the control of deetiolation and flowering in rice

We have isolated phytochrome B (phyB) and phyC mutants from rice (Oryza sativa) and have produced all combinations of double mutants. Seedlings of phyB and phyB phyC mutants exhibited a partial loss of sensitivity to continuous red light (Rc) but still showed significant deetiolation responses. The responses to Rc were completely canceled in phyA phyB double mutants. These results indicate that phyA and phyB act in a highly redundant manner to control deetiolation under Rc. Under continuous far-red light (FRc), phyA mutants showed partially impaired deetiolation, and phyA phyC double mutants showed no significant residual phytochrome responses, indicating that not only phyA but also phyC is involved in the photoperception of FRc in rice. Interestingly, the phyB phyC double mutant displayed clear R/FR reversibility in the pulse irradiation experiments, indicating that both phyA and phyB can mediate the low-fluence response for gene expression. Rice is a short-day plant, and we found that mutation in either phyB or phyC caused moderate early flowering under the long-day photoperiod, while monogenic phyA mutation had little effect on the flowering time. The phyA mutation, however, in combination with phyB or phyC mutation caused dramatic early flowering.     

EARLY FLOWERING 4 functions in phytochrome B-regulated seedling de-etiolation

To define the functions of genes previously identified by expression profiling as being rapidly light induced under phytochrome (phy) control, we are investigating the seedling de-etiolation phenotypes of mutants carrying T-DNA insertional disruptions at these loci. Mutants at one such locus displayed reduced responsiveness to continuous red, but not continuous far-red light, suggesting a role in phyB signaling but not phyA signaling. Consistent with such a role, expression of this gene is induced by continuous red light in wild-type seedlings, but the level of induction is strongly reduced in phyB-null mutants. The locus encodes a novel protein that we show localizes to the nucleus, thus suggesting a function in light-regulated gene expression. Recently, this locus was identified as EARLY FLOWERING 4, a gene implicated in floral induction and regulating the expression of the gene CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1. Together with these previous data, our findings suggest that EARLY FLOWERING 4 functions as a signaling intermediate in phy-regulated gene expression involved in promotion of seedling de-etiolation, circadian clock function, and photoperiod perception.     

Coupling of phytochrome B to the control of hypocotyl growth in Arabidopsis

Etiolated seedlings of the wild-type (WT) and of the phyB-1 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. were exposed to red-light (R) and far-red light (FR) treatments to characterize the action of phytochrome B on hypocotyl extension growth. A single R or FR pulse had no detectable effects on hypocotyl growth. After 24-h pre-treatment with continuous FR (FRc) a single R, compared to FR pulse inhibited (more than 70%) subsequent hypocotyl growth in the WT but not in the phyB-1 mutant. This effect of FRc was fluence-rate dependent and more efficient than continuous R (Rc) or hourly FR pulses of equal total fluence. Hypocotyl growth inhibition by Rc was larger in WT than phyB-1 seedlings when chlorophyll screening was reduced either by using broadband Rc (maximum emission 610 nm) or by using narrow-band Rc (658 nm) over short periods (24 h) or with seedlings bleached with Norflurazon. Hourly R or R + FR pulses had similar effects in WT and phyB-1 mutant etiolated seedlings. It is concluded that phytochrome B is not the only photoreceptor of Rc and that the action of phytochrome B is enhanced by a FRc high-irradiance reaction. Complementary experiments with the phyA-201 mutant indicate that this promotion of a phytochrome B-mediated response occurs via co-action with phytochrome A.Abbreviations D darkness - FR far-red light - FRc continuous FR - Pfr FR-absorbing form of phytochrome - HIR high-irradiance reaction - Pfr/P proportion of phytochrome as Pfr - phyA phytochrome A - phyB phytochrome B - R red light - Rc continuous R - WT wild-type I thank Professors R.E. Kendrick and M. Koornneef (Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands) and Professor J. Chory (Salk Institute, Calif., USA) for their kind provision of the original WT and phyB-1 and phyA-201 seed, respectively. This work was financially supported by grants PID and PID-BID from CONICET, AG 040 from Universidad de Buenos Aires and A 12830/1-000019 from Fundación Antorchas.     

Interaction of phytochromes A and B in the control of de-etiolation and flowering in pea

The interactions of phytochrome A (phyA) and phytochrome B (phyB) in the photocontrol of vegetative and reproductive development in pea have been investigated using null mutants for each phytochrome. White-light-grown phyA phyB double mutant plants show severely impaired de-etiolation both at the seedling stage and later in development, with a reduced rate of leaf production and swollen, twisted internodes, and enlarged cells in all stem tissues. PhyA and phyB act in a highly redundant manner to control de-etiolation under continuous, high-irradiance red light. The phyA phyB double mutant shows no significant residual phytochrome responses for either de-etiolation or shade-avoidance, but undergoes partial de-etiolation in blue light. PhyB is shown to inhibit flowering under both long and short photoperiods and this inhibition is required for expression of the promotive effect of phyA. PhyA is solely responsible for the promotion of flowering by night-breaks with white light, whereas phyB appears to play a major role in detection of light quality in end-of-day light treatments, night breaks and day extensions. Finally, the inhibitory effect of phyB is not graft-transmissible, suggesting that phyB acts in a different manner and after phyA in the control of flower induction.     

The jasmonate-free rice mutant hebiba is affected in the response of phyA'/phyA" pools and protochlorophyllide biosynthesis to far-red light.

Phytochrome (phy) A in its two native isoforms (phyA' and phyA") and the active (Pchlide(655)) and inactive (Pchlide(633)) protochlorophyllides were investigated by low-temperature fluorescence spectroscopy in the tips of rice (Oryza sativa L. Japonica cv Nihonmasari) coleoptiles from wild type (WT) and the jasmonate-deficient mutant hebiba. The seedlings were either grown in the dark or under pulsed (FRp) or continuous (FRc) far-red light (lambda(a) >/= 720 nm) of equal fluences. In the dark, the mutant had a long mesocotyl and a short coleoptile, whereas the situation was reversed under FR: short mesocotyl and long coleoptile, suggesting that the effect is mediated by phyA. Under these conditions the WT displayed a short coleoptile and emergence of the first leaf. In the dark, the spectroscopic and photochemical properties of phyA, its content and the proportion of its two pools, phyA' and phyA", were virtually identical between WT and hebiba. However, the total content of protochlorophyllides was higher in the mutant. Upon illumination with FRc, [phyA] declined in the WT and the ratio between phyA' and phyA" shifted towards phyA". In hebiba, the light-induced decline of [phyA] was less pronounced and the ratio between phyA' and phyA" did not shift. Moreover, in the WT, FRp stimulated the biosynthesis of Pchlide(655), whereas FRc was inhibiting. In contrast, in the mutant, both FRp and FRc stimulated the synthesis of Pchlide(655). This means that FRc caused the opposite effect in hebiba. This difference correlates with a slower photodestruction of primarily the light-labile phyA' pool in hebiba.     

Fluence and wavelength requirements for Arabidopsis CAB gene induction by different phytochromes.

The roles of different phytochromes have been investigated in the photoinduction of several chlorophyll a/b-binding protein genes (CAB) of Arabidopsis thaliana. Etiolated seedlings of the wild type, a phytochrome A (PhyA) null mutant (phyA), a phytochrome B (PhyB) null mutant (phyB), and phyA/phyB double mutant were exposed to monochromatic light to address the questions of the fluence and wavelength requirements for CAB induction by different phytochromes. In the wild type and the phyB mutant, PhyA photoirreversibly induced CAB expression upon irradiation with very-low-fluence light of 350 to 750 nm. In contrast, using the phyA mutant, PhyB photoreversibly induced CAB expression with low-fluence red light. The threshold fluences of red light for PhyA- and PhyB-specific induction were about 10 nmol m-2 and 10 mumol m-2, respectively. In addition, CAB expression was photoreversibly induced with low-fluence red light in the phyA/phyB double mutant, revealing that another phytochrome(s) (PhyX) regulated CAB expression in a manner similar to PhyB. These data suggest that plants utilize different phytochromes to perceive light of varying wave-lengths and fluence, and begin to explain how plants respond so exquisitely to changing light in their environment.     

Light exaggerates apical hook curvature through phytochrome actions in tomato seedlings

Contrary to the established notion that the apical hook of dark-grown dicotyledonous seedlings opens in response to light, we found in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) that the apical hook curvature is exaggerated by light. Experiments with several tomato cultivars and phytochrome mutants, irradiated with red and far-red light either as a brief pulse (Rp, FRp) or continuously (Rc, FRc), revealed: the hook-exaggeration response is maximal at the emergence of the hypocotyl from the seed; the effect of Rp is FRp-reversible; fluence–response curves to a single Rp or FRp show an involvement of low and very low fluence responses (LFR, VLFR); the effect of Rc is fluence-rate dependent, but that of FRc is not; the phyA mutant (phyA hp-1) failed to respond to an Rp of less than 10⁻² μmol m⁻² and to an FRp of all fluences tested as well as to FRc, thus indicating that the hook-exaggeration response involves phyA-mediated VLFR. The Rp fluence–response curve with the same mutant also confirmed the presence of an LFR mediated by phytochrome(s) other than phyA, although the phyB1 mutant (phyB1 hp-1) still showed full response probably due to other redundant phytochrome species (e.g., phyB2). Simulation experiments led to the possible significance of hook exaggeration in the field that the photoresponse may facilitate the release of seed coat when seeds germinate at some range of depth in soil. It was also observed that seed coat and/or endosperm are essential to the hook exaggeration.     

The Phytochrome B/Phytochrome C Heterodimer Is Necessary for Phytochrome C-Mediated Responses in Rice Seedlings

Background

PhyC levels have been observed to be markedly lower in phyB mutants than in Arabidopsis or rice wild type etiolated seedlings, but the mechanism of this phenomenon has not been fully elucidated.

Results

In the present study, we investigated the mechanism by which phyB affects the protein concentration and photo-sensing abilities of phyC and demonstrated that rice phyC exists predominantly as phyB/phyC heterodimers in etiolated seedlings. PHYC-GFP protein was detected when expressed in phyA phyC mutants, but not in phyA phyB mutants, suggesting that phyC requires phyB for its photo-sensing abilities. Interestingly, when a mutant PHYB gene that has no chromophore binding site, PHYB(C364A), was introduced into phyB mutants, the phyC level was restored. Moreover, when PHYB(C364A) was introduced into phyA phyB mutants, the seedlings exhibited de-etiolation under both far-red light (FR) and red light (R) conditions, while the phyA phyB mutants were blind to both FR and R. These results are the first direct evidence that phyC is responsible for regulating seedling de-etiolation under both FR and R. These findings also suggest that phyB is indispensable for the expression and function of phyC, which depends on the formation of phyB/phyC heterodimers.

Significance

The present report clearly demonstrates the similarities and differences in the properties of phyC between Arabidopsis and rice and will advance our understanding of phytochrome functions in monocots and dicots.     

Phytochrome A enhances the promotion of hypocotyl growth caused by reductions in levels of phytochrome B in its far-red-light-absorbing form in light-grown Arabidopsis thaliana.

We sought to determine if phytochrome B (phyB)-mediated responses to the red light (R)/far-red light (FR) ratio are affected by phytochrome A (phyA) activity in light-grown seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana. Pulses of FR delayed into the dark period were less effective than end-of-day (EOD) FR in promoting hypocotyl growth over a given period in darkness. White light minus blue light interposed instead of darkness between the end of the white-light photoperiod and the FR pulse was sufficient to maintain responsivity to the decrease in phyB in FR-light-absorbing form in wild-type (WT) seedlings, but not in the phyA mutant. Compared with EOD R, hourly R+FR pulses provided throughout the night caused a stronger promotion of stem growth than a single EOD R+FR pulse in WT Arabidopsis, cucumber, mustard, sunflower, tobacco, and tomato, but not in phyA Arabidopsis or in the aurea mutant of tomato. WT seedlings of Arabidopsis responded to a range of high EOD R/FR ratios, whereas the phyA mutant required stronger reductions in the EOD R/FR ratio. In sunlight, phyA seedlings of Arabidopsis showed no response to the "early warning" signals of neighboring vegetation, and hypocotyl-growth promotion occurred at higher plant densities than in the WT. Thus, under a series of light conditions, the sensitivity or responsivity to reductions in the R/FR ratio were larger in WT than in phyA seedlings. A product of phyA is therefore proposed to enhance the hypocotyl-growth response to decreases in phyB in FR-light-absorbing form in light grown seedlings.     

Dual effect of phytochrome A on hypocotyl growth under continuous red light

The role of phytochrome A in the control of hypocotyl growth under continuous red light (Rc) was investigated using phyA and phyB mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana, which lack phytochrome A (phyA) or phytochrome B (phyB), respectively, and transgenic seedlings of Nicotiana tabacum overexpressing Avena phyA, compared to the corresponding wild type (WT). In WT seedlings of A. thaliana, hypocotyl growth inhibition showed a biphasic response to the fluence rate of Rc, with a brake at 10^?2μmol m^?2 s^?1. At equal total fluence rate, hourly pulses of red light caused slightly more inhibition than Rc. The response to very low fluences of continuous or pulsed red light was absent in the phyA and phyA phyB mutants and present in the phyB mutant. The second part of the response was steeper in the phyA mutant than in the WT but was absent in the phyB mutant. In WT tobacco the response to Rc was biphasic. Overexpression of Avena phyA enhanced the response only at very low fluence rates of Rc (< 10^?2μmol m^?2 s^?1). In both species, the effect of hourly pulses of far-red light was similar to the maximum inhibition observed in the first phase of the response to Rc. Using reciprocity failure (i.e. higher inhibition under continuous than pulsed light) as the operational criterion, a ‘true’ high-irradiance reaction occurred under continuous far-red light but not under Rc or red plus far-red light mixtures. Native and overexpressed phyA are proposed to mediate very low fluence responses under Rc. In WT A. thaliana, this effect is counteracted by a negative action of phyA on phyB-mediated low-fluence responses.     

PNZIP Is a Novel Mesophyll-Specific cDNA That Is Regulated by Phytochrome and a Circadian Rhythm and Encodes a Protein with a Leucine Zipper Motif

Single, double, and triple null combinations of Arabidopsis mutants lacking the photoreceptors phytochrome (phy) A (phyA-201), phyB (phyB-5), and cryptochrome (cry) 1 (hy4-2.23n) were examined for de-etiolation responses in high-fluence red, far-red, blue, and broad-spectrum white light. Cotyledon unhooking, unfolding, and expansion, hypocotyl growth, and the accumulation of chlorophylls and anthocyanin in 5-d-old seedlings were measured under each light condition and in the dark. phyA was the major photoreceptor/effector for most far-red-light responses, although phyB and cry1 modulated anthocyanin accumulation in a phyA-dependent manner. phyB was the major photoreceptor in red light, although cry1 acted as a phyA/phyB-dependent modulator of chlorophyll accumulation under these conditions. All three photoreceptors contributed to most blue light deetiolation responses, either redundantly or additively; however, phyB acted as a modulator of cotyledon expansion dependent on the presence of cry1. As reported previously, flowering time in long days was promoted by phyA and inhibited by phyB, with each suppressing the other's effect. In addition to the effector/modulator relationships described above, measurements of hypocotyls from blue-light-grown seedlings demonstrated phytochrome activity in blue light and cry1 activity in a phyAphyB mutant background.     

Phytochrome A: functional diversity and polymorphism.

Phytochrome (phy), a 124 kDa biliprotein, mediates plants' perception of environmental light conditions including quantity, quality and duration of light. The complex phenomenology of phy function is connected with its polymorphism, the major phys being phyA and phyB. PhyA mediates irreversible photoresponses in the very low and high fluence ranges (VLFR and HIR) primarily in the far-red (FR) spectral region, whereas phyB mediates the 'classical' R/FR reversible responses in the low fluence range (LFR). This phyA specificity is determined at the level of (i) intramolecular events, (ii) turnover, phyA being light-labile, and (iii) nuclear-cytoplasmic partitioning and interaction with partner proteins. A unique feature of phyA is that two native isoforms, phyA' and phyA', comprise it, distinguished by spectroscopic and photochemical properties, localization and abundance in plant tissues, light stability, and other properties. They differ by the post-translational modification at the 6 kDa N-terminus, possibly phosphorylation, phyA' being phosphorylated and phyA' dephosphorylated. Both species participate in the light-induced nuclear-cytoplasmic partitioning. The light-labile phyA' is responsible for de-etiolation (VLFR and HIR modes), whereas the relatively more light-stable phyA' could be active throughout the whole life cycle. PhyA' interferes with the action of phyA' and this interaction may be part of the fine tuning mechanism of the phyA function. Finally, within the phyA' pool there are different conformers in thermal equilibrium, that differ by the activation and kinetic parameters of the Pr-->lumi-R photoreaction. This heterogeneity of phyA may account, at least partially, for the complex dynamics of its photoprocesses and the phenomenology of photoresponses.     

Antagonistic but complementary actions of phytochromes A and B allow seedling de-etiolation.

Using dichromatic radiation, we show that the actions of phytochromes A and B (phyA and phyB) in Arabidopsis thaliana are antagonistic in mediating red and far-red radiation effects on seedling de-etiolation and yet act in a complementary manner to regulate de-etiolation, irrespective of spectral composition. At low phytochrome photoequilibria inhibition of hypocotyl extension was strong, because of the action of a far-red high-irradiance response mediated by phyA. At high phytochrome photoequilibria inhibition of hypocotyl extension was also strong, because of the action of phyB. At intermediate photoequilibria hypocotyl inhibition was less strong. In their natural environment, this dual action will strongly retard hypocotyl growth and promote cotyledon opening and expansion both in open daylight and under dense vegetation. Overlapping action by phyA and phyB will substantially promote de-etiolation in sparse vegetation. The antagonistic and complementary actions of phyA and phyB, therefore, allow the optimum regulation of seedling growth after emergence from the soil.     

Photomorphogenic responses to UV radiation IV: a comparative study of UVB effects on growth and pigment accumulation in etiolated and de-etiolated hypocotyls of wild-type and aurea mutant of tomato Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)

ABSTRACT

The question of how de-etiolation of tomato seedling under continuous monochromatic yellow light exerts an influence on UV radiation-induced responses has been studied. Hypocotyl extension and the accumulation of anthocyanins and UV-absorbing compounds was compared in the aurea mutant of tomato and its isogenic wild type. The data of the present paper provide evidence that, during de-etiolation of tomato seedlings, yellow light exerts its effects over seedlings responsiveness to subsequent UV irradiation through several mechanisms: 1) a significant enhancement of shorter UVB wavelength efficiency in both the genotypes; 2) the abolition of UVA -blue light-induced accumulation of UV-absorbing compounds that does not involve pnyA; 3) the disappearance of UVA-blue light-induced hypocotyl growth inhibition that does not involve phyA; 4) higher anthocyanin accumulation rate in response to UV radiation mediated by phyA. Yellow light-induced growth inhibition and accumulation of UV-absorbing compound both mediated by phyA and present only in wild type tomato, appear to be completely separate from the action of UV radiation on the same responses.