Response accuracy and odor sampling time in mice trained to discriminate between enantiomers of carvone and those of terpinen-4-ol

Response accuracy and odor-sampling times were used to compare the ability of mice to detect (+)-carvone and (+)-terpinen-4-ol and to discriminate between enantiomers of carvone and of terpinen-4-ol. Except for increased odor sampling when mice were first exposed to the (+)-carvone odor, there was no difference in odor-sampling time or response accuracy in tests of odor detection or in discriminating between enantiomers of these odorants. These results fail to support the suggestion that odorants that produce different patterns of olfactory bulb activation should be easier to discriminate than those that produce much more similar patterns of bulbar activation.     

Enantioselectivity of the musk odor sensation

This brief review, the summary of a talk at the Symposium on Biological Chirality 2000 in Szeged, Hungary, illustrates what chiral recognition tells us about the molecular parameters of the musk odor sensation. While the enantioselectivity of odor perception is strong evidence for the key role of proteinogenic receptors in the molecular mechanism of olfaction, the quantitative and qualitative odor differences of enantiomers are often not very pronounced, as in the case of muscone (17/26). In those cases, however, where there is strong enantiodiscrimination, we find most intense musk odorants with very low odor thresholds, such as (-)-(12R)-12-methyl-9-oxa-14-tetradecanolide (35), (12R;9Z)-12-methyl-14-tetradec-9-enolide [(R)-Nirvanolide, 38], and (-)-(4S;7R)-1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta[g]-2-benzopyran [(-)-(4S;7R)-Galaxolide, 57], the latter being rather rigid. We thus can assume the geometry of the musk receptor to be fairly complementary to these compounds, which therefore can serve as templates for the design of new musk odorants.     

Coding of odors by a receptor repertoire

We provide a systematic analysis of how odor quality, quantity, and duration are encoded by the odorant receptor repertoire of the Drosophila antenna. We test the receptors with a panel of over 100 odors and find that strong responses are sparse, with response density dependent on chemical class. Individual receptors range along a continuum from narrowly tuned to broadly tuned. Broadly tuned receptors are most sensitive to structurally similar odorants. Strikingly, inhibitory responses are widespread among receptors. The temporal dynamics of the receptor repertoire provide a rich representation of odor quality, quantity, and duration. Receptors with similar odor sensitivity often map to widely dispersed glomeruli in the antennal lobe. We construct a multidimensional "odor space" based on the responses of each individual receptor and find that the positions of odors depend on their chemical class, concentration, and molecular complexity. The space provides a basis for predicting behavioral responses to odors.     

An odorant derivative as an antagonist for an olfactory receptor

Different odorants are recognized by different combinations of G protein-coupled olfactory receptors, and thereby, odor identity is determined by a combinatorial receptor code for each odorant. We recently demonstrated that odorants appeared to compete for receptor sites to act as an agonist or an antagonist. Therefore, in natural circumstances where we always perceive a mixture of various odorants, olfactory receptor antagonism between odorants may result in a receptor code for the mixture that cannot be predicted from the codes for its individual components. Here we show that stored isoeugenol has an antagonistic effect on a mouse olfactory receptor, mOR-EG. However, freshly purified isoeugenol did not have an inhibitory effect. Instead, an isoeugenol derivative produced during storage turned out to be a potent competitive antagonist of mOR-EG. Structural analysis revealed that this derivative is an oxidatively dimerized isoeugenol that naturally occurs by oxidative reaction. The current study indicates that as odorants age, they decompose or react with other odorants, which in turn affects responsiveness of an olfactory receptor(s).     

Dose-response characteristics of glomerular activity in the moth antennal lobe

Odours are represented as unique combinations of activated glomeruli in the antennal lobes of insects. Receptor neurons arborizing in the glomeruli are not only qualitatively selective, but in addition respond to variations in stimulus concentration. As each glomerulus likely represents a single receptor neuron type, optical recordings of calcium changes in insect antennal lobes show how concentration variations affect a large population of afferents. We measured the glomerular responses in the moth Spodoptera littoralis to different concentrations of plant-related odorants. Localized calcium responses were shown to correspond to individual glomeruli. We found that the dynamic range of glomerular responses spanned 3-4 log units of concentration and the most strongly responding glomeruli often reached a plateau at high stimulus doses. Further, we showed that the single most active glomerulus was often not the same across concentrations. However, if the principal glomerulus moved, it was generally to an adjacent or proximal glomerulus. As concentration increased, a higher number of glomeruli became activated. Correlations of glomerular representations of the same compound at different doses decreased as the difference in concentration increased. Moreover, representations evoked by different odorants were more correlated at high than at low doses, which means that the uniqueness of activity patterns decreased with increasing concentration. Thus, if odours are coded as spatial patterns of glomerular activity, as has been suggested, these olfactory codes are not persistent across concentrations.     

Combinatorial receptor codes for odors

The discriminatory capacity of the mammalian olfactory system is such that thousands of volatile chemicals are perceived as having distinct odors. Here we used a combination of calcium imaging and single-cell RT-PCR to identify odorant receptors (ORs) for odorants with related structures but varied odors. We found that one OR recognizes multiple odorants and that one odorant is recognized by multiple ORs, but that different odorants are recognized by different combinations of ORs. Thus, the olfactory system uses a combinatorial receptor coding scheme to encode odor identities. Our studies also indicate that slight alterations in an odorant, or a change in its concentration, can change its "code," potentially explaining how such changes can alter perceived odor quality.     

Molecular receptive range variation among mouse odorant receptors for aliphatic carboxylic acids

The ability of mammals to identify and distinguish among many thousands of different odorants suggests a combinatorial use of odorant receptors, with each receptor detecting multiple odorants and each odorant interacting with multiple receptors. Numerous receptors may be devoted to the sampling of particularly important regions of odor space. In this study, we explore the similarities and differences in the molecular receptive ranges of four mouse odorant receptors (MOR23-1, MOR31-4, MOR32-11 and MOR40-4), which have previously been identified as receptors for aliphatic carboxylic acids. Each receptor was expressed in Xenopus oocytes, along with Gα_olf and the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator to allow electrophysiological assay of receptor responses. We find that even though these receptors are relatively unrelated, there is extensive overlap among their receptive ranges. That is, these receptors sample a similar region of odor space. However, the receptive range of each receptor is unique. Thus, these receptors contribute to the depth of coverage of this small region of odor space. Such a group of receptors with overlapping, but distinct receptive ranges, may participate in making fine distinctions among complex mixtures of closely related odorant compounds.     

The molecular basis of odor coding in the Drosophila antenna

We have undertaken a functional analysis of the odorant receptor repertoire in the Drosophila antenna. Each receptor was expressed in a mutant olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) used as a "decoder," and the odor response spectrum conferred by the receptor was determined in vivo by electrophysiological recordings. The spectra of these receptors were then matched to those of defined ORNs to establish a receptor-to-neuron map. In addition to the odor response spectrum, the receptors dictate the signaling mode, i.e., excitation or inhibition, and the response dynamics of the neuron. An individual receptor can mediate both excitatory and inhibitory responses to different odorants in the same cell, suggesting a model of odorant receptor transduction. Receptors vary widely in their breadth of tuning, and odorants vary widely in the number of receptors they activate. Together, these properties provide a molecular basis for odor coding by the receptor repertoire of an olfactory organ.     

Learned odor discrimination in Drosophila without combinatorial odor maps in the antennal lobe

A unifying feature of mammalian and insect olfactory systems is that olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) expressing the same unique odorant-receptor gene converge onto the same glomeruli in the brain [1-7]. Most odorants activate a combination of receptors and thus distinct patterns of glomeruli, forming a proposed combinatorial spatial code that could support discrimination between a large number of odorants [8-11]. OSNs also exhibit odor-evoked responses with complex temporal dynamics [11], but the contribution of this activity to behavioral odor discrimination has received little attention [12]. Here, we investigated the importance of spatial encoding in the relatively simple Drosophila antennal lobe. We show that Drosophila can learn to discriminate between two odorants with one functional class of Or83b-expressing OSNs. Furthermore, these flies encode one odorant from a mixture and cross-adapt to odorants that activate the relevant OSN class, demonstrating that they discriminate odorants by using the same OSNs. Lastly, flies with a single class of Or83b-expressing OSNs recognize a specific odorant across a range of concentration, indicating that they encode odorant identity. Therefore, flies can distinguish odorants without discrete spatial codes in the antennal lobe, implying an important role for odorant-evoked temporal dynamics in behavioral odorant discrimination.     

High-throughput Analysis of Mammalian Olfactory Receptors: Measurement of Receptor Activation via Luciferase Activity

Odorants create unique and overlapping patterns of olfactory receptor activation, allowing a family of approximately 1,000 murine and 400 human receptors to recognize thousands of odorants. Odorant ligands have been published for fewer than 6% of human receptors^1-11. This lack of data is due in part to difficulties functionally expressing these receptors in heterologous systems. Here, we describe a method for expressing the majority of the olfactory receptor family in Hana3A cells, followed by high-throughput assessment of olfactory receptor activation using a luciferase reporter assay. This assay can be used to (1) screen panels of odorants against panels of olfactory receptors; (2) confirm odorant/receptor interaction via dose response curves; and (3) compare receptor activation levels among receptor variants. In our sample data, 328 olfactory receptors were screened against 26 odorants. Odorant/receptor pairs with varying response scores were selected and tested in dose response. These data indicate that a screen is an effective method to enrich for odorant/receptor pairs that will pass a dose response experiment, i.e. receptors that have a bona fide response to an odorant. Therefore, this high-throughput luciferase assay is an effective method to characterize olfactory receptors—an essential step toward a model of odor coding in the mammalian olfactory system.     

Developmental regulation of olfactory circuit formation in mice

In mammals, odorants induce various behavioral responses that are critical to the survival of the individual and species. Binding signals of odorants to odorant receptors (ORs) expressed in the olfactory epithelia are converted to an odor map, a pattern of activated glomeruli, in the olfactory bulb (OB). This topographic map is used to identify odorants for memory-based learned decisions. In the embryo, a coarse olfactory map is generated in the OB by a combination of dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior targeting of olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), using specific sets of axon-guidance molecules. During the process of OSN projection, odor signals are sorted into distinct odor qualities in separate functional domains in the OB. Odor information is then conveyed by the projection neurons, mitral/tufted cells, to various regions in the olfactory cortex, particularly to the amygdala for innate olfactory decisions. Although the basic architecture of hard-wired circuits is generated by a genetic program, innate olfactory responses are modified by neonatal odor experience in an activity-dependent manner. Stimulus-driven OR activity promotes post-synaptic events and dendrite selection in the responding glomeruli making them larger. As a result, enhanced odor inputs in neonates establish imprinted olfactory memory that induces attractive responses in adults, even when the odor quality is innately aversive. In this paper, I will provide an overview of the recent progress made in the olfactory circuit formation in mice.     

Different thresholds for detection and discrimination of odors in the honey bee (Apis mellifera)

Naturally occurring odors used by animals for mate recognition, food identification and other purposes must be detected at concentrations that vary across several orders of magnitude. Olfactory systems must therefore have the capacity to represent odors over a large range of concentrations regardless of dramatic changes in the salience, or perceived intensity, of a stimulus. The stability of the representation of an odor relative to other odors across concentration has not been extensively evaluated. We tested the ability of honey bees to discriminate pure odorants across a range of concentrations at and above their detection threshold. Our study showed that pure odorant compounds became progressively easier for honey bees to discriminate with increasing concentration. Discrimination is, therefore, a function of odorant concentration. We hypothesize that the recruitment of sensory cell populations across a range of concentrations may be important for odor coding, perhaps by changing its perceptual qualities or by increasing its salience against background stimuli, and that this mechanism is a general property of olfactory systems.     

Olfactory discrimination ability for aromatic odorants as a function of oxygen moiety.

To assess the significance of the type of oxygen moiety on odor quality of aromatic compounds, I tested the ability of human subjects to distinguish between odorants sharing a benzene ring and the same total number of carbon atoms but differing in their functional groups. Phenyl ethanol, phenyl acetaldehyde, phenyl methyl ketone, methyl benzoate and phenyl acetic acid, were employed. In a forced-choice triangular test procedure 20 subjects were repeatedly presented with all possible binary combinations of the five odorants, and asked to identify the bottle containing the odd stimulus. I found (i) that as a group, the subjects performed significantly above chance level in six of the tasks whereas they failed to do so with the four other tasks; (ii) marked interindividual differences in discrimination performance, ranging from subjects who were able to significantly distinguish between all 10 odor pairs to subjects who failed to do so with the majority of the tasks; and (iii) that odor pairs that involved methyl benzoate or phenyl methyl ketone were significantly easier to discriminate than those that involved phenyl acetaldehyde or phenyl ethanol, and thus there was a clear dependence of discriminability on type of functional group. Additional tests of the degree of trigeminality of the five aromatic substances indicated that the discriminability of the odor pairs is indeed due to differences in odor quality. A comparison of the present results with those of an earlier study that employed aliphatic odorants suggests that functional oxygen-containing groups may generally be an important determinant of the interaction between the stimulus molecule and the olfactory receptor, and thus may generally be a molecular property affecting odor quality in a substance class-specific manner. The poorer discriminatory performance of the subjects with aromatic odorants compared with corresponding aliphatic substances suggests that the structure of the alkyl rest attached to a functional group may also play a crucial role for recognition of ligands at the olfactory receptor and thus for odor quality.     

TRPV1 receptors and nasal trigeminal chemesthesis

The trigeminal nerve responds to a wide variety of irritants. Trigeminal nerve fibers express several receptors that respond to chemicals, including TRPV1 (vanilloid) receptors, acid-sensing ion channels, P2X (purinergic) receptors, and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. In order to assess whether TRPV1 plays a role in responses to a broad array of substances, TRPV1 (along with green fluorescent protein) was expressed in human embyonic kidney cells (HEK) 293t cells which were then stimulated with diverse trigeminal irritants. Calcium imaging was used to measure responses to capsaicin, amyl acetate, cyclohexanone, acetic acid, toluene, benzaldehyde, (-)-nicotine, (R)-(+)-limonene, (R)-(-)-carvone, and (S)-(+)-carvone. Three irritants (acetic acid and the 2 carvones) stimulated nontransfected controls. Two irritants (capsaicin and cyclohexanone) stimulated only transfected cells. The response could be eliminated with capsazepine, a TRPV1 blocker. The 5 remaining irritants were nonstimulatory in both nontransfected and transfected cells. Because all the compounds tested on HEK cells elicited neural responses from the ethmoid branch of the trigeminal nerve in rats, the 5 nonstimulatory compounds must do so by a non-TRPV1 receptor. These results suggest that TRPV1 serves as a receptor for both cyclohexanone and capsaicin in trigeminal nerve endings.     

Predicting Odor Pleasantness with an Electronic Nose

A primary goal for artificial nose (eNose) technology is to report perceptual qualities of novel odors. Currently, however, eNoses primarily detect and discriminate between odorants they previously “learned”. We tuned an eNose to human odor pleasantness estimates. We then used the eNose to predict the pleasantness of novel odorants, and tested these predictions in naïve subjects who had not participated in the tuning procedure. We found that our apparatus generated odorant pleasantness ratings with above 80% similarity to average human ratings, and with above 90% accuracy at discriminating between categorically pleasant or unpleasant odorants. Similar results were obtained in two cultures, native Israeli and native Ethiopian, without retuning of the apparatus. These findings suggest that unlike in vision and audition, in olfaction there is a systematic predictable link between stimulus structure and stimulus pleasantness. This goes in contrast to the popular notion that odorant pleasantness is completely subjective, and may provide a new method for odor screening and environmental monitoring, as well as a critical building block for digital transmission of smell.     

Analysis of Odor Discrimination by Multidimensional Scaling at Different Temperatures

Discrimination of odorants by the turtle olfactory bulb at 25°and 37°C was examined by the cross-adaptation techniqueand analysed by multidimensional scaling. Analysis by multidimensionalscaling suggests that at 25°C odorants are grouped accordingto their odor qualities in the turtle olfactory system. At 37°C,the cluster formation of odorants, which have a similar odorquality, such as minty and floral alcohol odorants and molecularstructure, in the plot of multidimensional scaling was poor,indicating that the ability of odor grouping according to theirodor qualities was low at 37°C. Chem. Senses 20: 565–571,1995.     

Neurophysiology of the vibration sense in locusts and bushcrickets: Response characteristics of single receptor units

The response characteristics of the vibration receptors in the legs of the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria, and the tettigoniid Decticus verrucivorus were investigated electro-physiologically by single cell recordings. The legs were stimulated by sinusoidal vibrations. There are four types of vibration receptor in each leg of Locusta and Decticus, which can be classified physiologically. One type—most probably campaniform sensilla—shows a phase-locked response to vibrations from 30 to 200 Hz, its threshold reflecting the displacement. A second type shows similar responses in the same frequency range, but its reactions depend on the stimulus acceleration. The receptor cells of the subgenual organ are very sensitive to vibration from 30 to at least 5000 Hz, and their responses depend on acceleration. There are two types of subgenual receptors, one of which shows a clear maximum of sensitivity between 200 and 1000 Hz, with a threshold below 0.01 m/sec^?2 acceleration. Subgenual receptors with different thresholds and different characteristic frequencies occur in each leg. The receptors of each leg pair have quite similar mean sensitivities and characteristic frequencies. However, in the front legs of tettigoniids the more sensitive subgenual receptors and an additional receptor type also respond to low-frequency airborne sound up to 10 kHz.     

Interaction between 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptors and intestinal nuclei. Binding to nuclear constituents in vitro

The molecular action of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) is thought to involve its localization within the nucleus of target cells, a process mediated by intracellular receptors. This report probes both the association between chick intestinal 1,25(OH)2D3 receptors and purified homologous nuclei and the interaction between this receptor and nucleic acids. 1,25(OH)2D3 receptors bound to purified nuclei in a apparently saturable manner (Kd = 2.2-4.8 X 10(-10) M) under conditions of intermediate ionic strength and constant protein concentration. Nuclear binding was hormone-dependent; whereas receptor-hormone complex (Rs) binds to nuclei under the ionic conditions employed here (greater than 70%), hormone-free (R0) receptors do not bind (less than 10%). Binding was localized to the nuclear chromatin fraction and was extremely sensitive to KCl concentration both in the incubation medium and during postincubation treatment of nuclei. The interaction appeared to be temperature-independent, suggesting the lack of a classic activation event characteristic of most steroid receptors. Partial digestion of intestinal nuclei with DNase I eliminated subsequent receptor binding by greater than 95%, pointing to the involvement of DNA in the binding interaction. In turn, receptors were found to bind to both DNA and RNA, a characteristic independent of receptor aggregation, but sensitive to disruption with increasing ionic strength buffers. Elution of both Rs and R0 from DNA appeared identical (0.28 M KCl), whereas the strength of interaction with RNA was much less (0.12 M KCl). Thus, while there appeared to be a fundamental difference between R0 and Rs, such that only the binding of receptor-hormone complex to nuclei was allowed under the conditions employed here, this characteristic was not observed during DNA binding. Nevertheless, the possibility exists that the in vivo interaction between 1,25(OH)2D3 receptor and nuclei involves DNA and that this nuclear constituent may be the ultimate site of action of this unique sterol hormone.     

A method for the calculation of odor character from molecular structure

The relationship between molecular structure and odor character is one of the most complex structure-activity problems in biology. Despite over a century of effort, it remains unsolved, and synthesis of new odorants still proceeds largely by trial and error. In previous work, I have argued that the reason for this failure lies in a mistaken assumption, namely that molecular shape determines odor character. Instead, I have taken up and extended an old idea (Dyson, 1938) according to which vertebrate olfactory receptors detect odorants by their molecular vibrations. I propose that the detection mechanism is inelastic electron tunnelling. If this is correct, there should be a correlation between the tunnelling vibrational spectra of odorants and their odor character. Here, using semi-empirical quantum chemistry methods and a simple calculation method for tunnelling mode intensities, I calculate the spectra of structurally diverse odorants belonging to various odor categories. With few exceptions, the calculated spectra of bitter almonds, musks, ambers, woods, sandalwoods and violets strongly correlate with odor character.