Rehabilitation of cancer through oncogene inactivation

The inactivation of the MYC oncogene alone can reverse tumorigenesis. Upon MYC inactivation, tumors stereotypically reverse, undergoing proliferative arrest, cellular differentiation and/or apoptosis. The precise consequences of MYC inactivation appear to depend upon both genetic and epigenetic parameters. In some types of cancer following MYC inactivation, tumor cells become well differentiated and biologically and histologically normal, inducing sustained tumor regression. However, in some cases, these normal-appearing cells are actually dormant tumor cells and upon MYC reactivation they rapidly recover their tumorigenic properties. Future therapies to treat cancer will need to address the possibility that tumor cells can camouflage a normal phenotype following treatment, resting in a dormant, latently cancerous state.     

Tumor Dormancy: Death and Resurrection of Cancer As Seen through Transgenic Mouse Models

Cancer is caused by genetic changes that activate oncogenes or inactivate tumor suppressor genes. The repair or inactivation of mutant genes may be effective in the treatment of cancer. Drugs that target oncogenes have shown to be effective in the treatment of some cancers. However, it is still unclear why the inactivation of a single cancer associated gene would ever result in the elimination of tumor cells. In experimental transgenic mouse models the consequences of oncogene inactivation depend upon the genetic and cellular context. In some cases, oncogene inactivation results in the elimination of all or almost all tumor cells through apoptosis or terminal differentiation. However, in other cases, oncogene inactivation results in the apparent loss of the neoplastic properties of tumor cells, that now appear and behave like normal cells, however, upon oncogene reactivation rapidly recover their neoplastic phenotype. These observations illustrate that oncogene inactivation can result in a state of tumor dormancy. Understanding when and how oncogene inactivation induces sustained tumor regression will be important towards the development of successful therapeutic strategies for cancer.     

Reversible tumorigenesis by MYC in hematopoietic lineages.

The targeted repair of mutant protooncogenes or the inactivation of their gene products may be a specific and effective therapy for human neoplasia. To examine this possibility, we have used the tetracycline regulatory system to generate transgenic mice that conditionally express the MYC protooncogene in hematopoietic cells. Sustained expression of the MYC transgene culminated in the formation of malignant T cell lymphomas and acute myleoid leukemias. The subsequent inactivation of the transgene caused regression of established tumors. Tumor regression was associated with rapid proliferative arrest, differentiation and apoptosis of tumor cells, and resumption of normal host hematopoiesis. We conclude that even though tumorigenesis is a multistep process, remediation of a single genetic lesion may be sufficient to reverse malignancy.     

DNA methylation changes in murine breast adenocarcinomas allow the identification of candidate genes for human breast carcinogenesis

Epigenetic inactivation due to aberrant promoter methylation is a key process in breast tumorigenesis. Murine models for human breast cancer have been established for nearly every important human oncogene or tumor suppressor gene. Mouse-to-human comparative gene expression and cytogenetic profiling have been widely investigated for these models; however, little is known about the conservation of epigenetic alterations during tumorigenesis. To determine if this key process in human breast tumorigenesis is also mirrored in a murine breast cancer model, we mapped cytosine methylation changes in primary adenocarcinomas and paired lung metastases derived from the polyomavirus middle T antigen mouse model. Global changes in methylcytosine levels were observed in all tumors when compared to the normal mammary gland. Aberrant methylation and associated gene silencing was observed for Hoxa7, a gene that is differentially methylated in human breast tumors, and Gata2, a novel candidate gene. Analysis of HOXA7 and GATA2 expression in a bank of human primary tumors confirms that the expression of these genes is also reduced in human breast cancer. In addition, HOXA7 hypermethylation is observed in breast cancer tissues when compared to adjacent tumor-free tissue. Based on these studies, we present a model in which comparative epigenetic techniques can be used to identify novel candidate genes important for human breast tumorigenesis, in both primary and metastatic tumors.     

Evolutionary dynamics of BRCA1 alterations in breast tumorigenesis

Cancer results from the accumulation of alterations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Tumor suppressors are classically defined as genes which contribute to tumorigenesis if their function is lost. Genetic or epigenetic alterations inactivating such genes may arise during somatic cell divisions or alternatively may be inherited from a parent. One notable exception to this rule is the BRCA1 tumor suppressor that predisposes to hereditary breast cancer when lost. Genetic alterations of this gene are hardly ever observed in sporadic breast cancer, while individuals harboring a germline mutation readily accumulate a second alteration inactivating the remaining allele—a finding which represents a conundrum in cancer genetics. In this paper, we present a novel mathematical framework of sporadic and hereditary breast tumorigenesis. We study the dynamics of genetic alterations driving breast tumorigenesis and explore those scenarios which can explain the absence of somatic BRCA1 alterations while replicating all other disease statistics. Our results support the existence of a heterozygous phenotype of BRCA1 and suggest that the loss of one BRCA1 allele may suppress the fitness advantage caused by the inactivation of other tumor suppressor genes. This paper contributes to the mathematical investigation of breast tumorigenesis.     

p53与Ras协同及其在肿瘤发生中的作用

肿瘤发生是抑癌基因失活和原癌基因激活共同作用的结果。p53基因被认为是目前最重要的抑癌基因, 50%以上的肿瘤中存在p53基因的点突变现象; 而Ras基因是肿瘤中突变率较高的原癌基因, 其突变率在某些肿瘤中高达30%~90%。研究发现, 肿瘤发生过程中抑癌基因p53与原癌基因Ras之间存在复杂的相互协同作用。根据目前的文献报道, p53与Ras之间的协同作用可以分为3种：第一, p53对Ras的调节作用; 第二, Ras对p53的调节作用; 第三, p53和Ras共同调控某些与肿瘤发生相关的关键基因。了解p53与Ras之间的3种调控作用将有助于我们进一步认识p53失活与Ras激活协同促进肿瘤发生的分子通路和机制, 同时也将为癌症的个性化治疗和药物靶点的选择提供重要依据。因此, 文章将对近年来所发现的p53与Ras的各种协同作用机制及其与肿瘤发生的关系进行概括和综述。     

How Cancers Escape Their Oncogene Habit

Many recent reports demonstrate that at least initially, the inactivation of an oncogene can induce sustained regression of even a highly invasive and genetically complex cancer. However, upon prolonged oncogene inactivation, some cancers ultimately relapse, becoming independent of the very oncogene that initiated the process of tumorigenesis. Understanding the specific mechanisms by which cancers can escape dependence upon a particular oncogene will be critical to anticipate mechanisms by which human cancers will evade therapies that target individual oncogenes. Thereby, more effective strategies will be developed to clinically treat cancer.     

How cancers escape their oncogene habit

Many recent reports demonstrate that at least initially, the inactivation of an oncogene can induce sustained regression of even a highly invasive and genetically complex cancer. However, upon prolonged oncogene inactivation, some cancers ultimately relapse, becoming independent of the very oncogene that initiated the process of tumorigenesis. Understanding the specific mechanisms by which cancers can escape dependence upon a particular oncogene will be critical to anticipate mechanisms by which human cancers will evade therapies that target individual oncogenes. Thereby, more effective strategies will be developed to clinically treat cancer.     

A mathematical methodology for determining the temporal order of pathway alterations arising during gliomagenesis

Human cancer is caused by the accumulation of genetic alterations in cells. Of special importance are changes that occur early during malignant transformation because they may result in oncogene addiction and thus represent promising targets for therapeutic intervention. We have previously described a computational approach, called Retracing the Evolutionary Steps in Cancer (RESIC), to determine the temporal sequence of genetic alterations during tumorigenesis from cross-sectional genomic data of tumors at their fully transformed stage. Since alterations within a set of genes belonging to a particular signaling pathway may have similar or equivalent effects, we applied a pathway-based systems biology approach to the RESIC methodology. This method was used to determine whether alterations of specific pathways develop early or late during malignant transformation. When applied to primary glioblastoma (GBM) copy number data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, RESIC identified a temporal order of pathway alterations consistent with the order of events in secondary GBMs. We then further subdivided the samples into the four main GBM subtypes and determined the relative contributions of each subtype to the overall results: we found that the overall ordering applied for the proneural subtype but differed for mesenchymal samples. The temporal sequence of events could not be identified for neural and classical subtypes, possibly due to a limited number of samples. Moreover, for samples of the proneural subtype, we detected two distinct temporal sequences of events: (i) RAS pathway activation was followed by TP53 inactivation and finally PI3K2 activation, and (ii) RAS activation preceded only AKT activation. This extension of the RESIC methodology provides an evolutionary mathematical approach to identify the temporal sequence of pathway changes driving tumorigenesis and may be useful in guiding the understanding of signaling rearrangements in cancer development.     

A unified theory for the development of cancer

It is postulated that cancer is the result of genetic and epigenetic changes that occur mainly in stem (precursor) cells of various cell types. I propose that there are three classes of genes which are involved in the development of cancer. These are: Class I, II and III oncogenes. The classification is based on the way the oncogene acts at the cellular level to further the development of cancer. Genetic changes, that is point mutations, deletions, inversions, amplifications and chromosome translocations, gains or losses in the genes themselves or epigenetic changes in the genes (e.g. DNA hypomethylation) or in the gene products (RNA or protein) are responsible for the development of cancer. Changes of oncogene activity have a genetic or epigenetic origin or both and result in quantitative or qualitative differences in the oncogene products. These are involved in changing normal cells into the cells demonstrating a cancer phenotype (usually a form of dedifferentiated cell) in a multistep process. There are several pathways to cancer and the intermediate steps are not necessarily defined in an orderly fashion. Activation of a particular Class I or II oncogene and inactivation of a Class III oncogene could occur at any step during the development of cancer. Most benign or malignant tumors consist of a heterogeneous mixture of dedifferentiated cells arising from a single cell.     

More is less: Inactivation and deletion events and the search for tumor suppressor genes

Tumor suppressor genes are frequently inactivated in cancer by large‐scale deletion events or epigenetic silencing, and experimental demonstration of such inactivation has historically been considered as support for assigning tumor suppressive function to a given gene. However, the discovery of a number of chromosomal domains wherein large deletions naturally occur at frequencies up to 100 times the average for the genome as a whole leads us to reevaluate the significance of sporadic deletions found within genes associated with these hotspots. Similarly, our recent demonstration that epigenetic chromatin silencing frequently spreads in cancer cells from gene‐poor into gene‐rich regions with apparent indifference to the gene content of the affected domain raises questions about the pertinence of inactivation as a criterion for ascribing tumor suppressor function to a given gene. We suggest that a number of putative suppressor genes for which inactivation and/or deletion events have been documented may simply be victims of collateral damage when these events occur, and the implication that these genes are being selected against during cancer progression should in some cases be reassessed. J. Cell. Biochem. 110: 281–287, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Differential Impact of Tumor Suppressor Pathways on DNA Damage Response and Therapy-Induced Transformation in a Mouse Primary Cell Model

The RB and p53 tumor suppressors are mediators of DNA damage response, and compound inactivation of RB and p53 is a common occurrence in human cancers. Surprisingly, their cooperation in DNA damage signaling in relation to tumorigenesis and therapeutic response remains enigmatic. In the context of individuals with heritable retinoblastoma, there is a predilection for secondary tumor development, which has been associated with the use of radiation-therapy to treat the primary tumor. Furthermore, while germline mutations of the p53 gene are critical drivers for cancer predisposition syndromes, it is postulated that extrinsic stresses play a major role in promoting varying tumor spectrums and disease severities. In light of these studies, we examined the tumor suppressor functions of these proteins when challenged by exposure to therapeutic stress. To examine the cooperation of RB and p53 in tumorigenesis, and in response to therapy-induced DNA damage, a combination of genetic deletion and dominant negative strategies was employed. Results indicate that loss/inactivation of RB and p53 is not sufficient for cellular transformation. However, these proteins played distinct roles in response to therapy-induced DNA damage and subsequent tumorigenesis. Specifically, RB status was critical for cellular response to damage and senescence, irrespective of p53 function. Loss of RB resulted in a dramatic evolution of gene expression as a result of alterations in epigenetic programming. Critically, the observed changes in gene expression have been specifically associated with tumorigenesis, and RB-deficient, recurred cells displayed oncogenic characteristics, as well as increased resistance to subsequent challenge with discrete therapeutic agents. Taken together, these findings indicate that tumor suppressor functions of RB and p53 are particularly manifest when challenged by cellular stress. In the face of such challenge, RB is a critical suppressor of tumorigenesis beyond p53, and RB-deficiency could promote significant cellular evolution, ultimately contributing to a more aggressive disease.     

Activation of multiple oncogene pathways: a model for experimental carcinogenesis

Evidence from experimental animal tumor models suggests that in many instances, the identity and mechanism of activation of cellular oncogenes is a function of both carcinogen and tissue specificity. In addition, the activation of no single oncogene has yet been found to be either sufficient or necessary for tumorigenesis in any particular experimental system. A hypothesis to account for these and other molecular and biological observations of experimental tumorigenesis has been developed. The hypothesis is based on the premise that multiple tissue specific groups or pathways of oncogenes exist in each cell, and that activation of all the oncogenes in any of these alternative pathways leads to transformation. It is assumed that each oncogene (which may be a member of one or more pathways) has a spontaneous and a carcinogen specific probability of activation. The latter value will vary from carcinogen to carcinogen. By modelling the spontaneous and carcinogen specific probabilities of activation of each gene, the number and identity of genes in each pathway, and the number of pathways in a particular cell type, it is possible to calculate the relative potency of carcinogens, the percentage of tumors containing each activated oncogene, the dose-response relationship, and other parameters. Use of this hypothetical model gives results consistent with experimental observations on oncogene activation in carcinogen-induced animal tumors.     

Chromosome instability and tumor lethality suppression in carcinogenesis

The maintenance and survival of each organism depends on its genome integrity. Alterations of essential genes, or aberrant chromosome number and structure lead to cell death. Paradoxically, cancer cells, especially in solid tumors, contain somatic gene mutations and are chromosome instability (CIN), suggesting a mechanism that cancer cells have acquired to suppress the lethal mutations and/or CIN. Herein we will discuss a tumor lethality suppression concept based on the studies of yeast genetic interactions and transgenic mice. During the early stages of the multistep process of tumorigenesis, incipient cancer cells probably have adopted genetic and epigenetic alterations to tolerate the lethal mutations of other genes that ensue, and to a larger extent CIN. In turn, CIN mediated massive gain and loss of genes provides a wider buffer for further genetic reshuffling, resulting in cancer cell heterogeneity, drug resistance and evasion of oncogene addiction, thus CIN may be both the effector and inducer of tumorigenesis. Accordingly, interfering with tumor lethality suppression could lead to cancer cell death or growth defects. Further validation of the tumor lethality suppression concept would help to elucidate the role of CIN in tumorigenesis, the relationship between CIN and somatic gene mutations, and would impact the design of anticancer drug development.     

The Importance of Genome Architecture in Cancer Susceptibility: Location,Location, Location

Tumorigenesis requires the interaction between different gene disruptions to convert anormal cell into a cancer cell. These gene disruptions can involve loss of expression ormisexpression of genes through genetic or epigenetic mutations. It is becoming clear that thesedisruptions are not isolated events in the genome, but are affected by genome architecture andthe syntenic relationship of alleles on chromosomes. A better understanding of the genetic andepigenetic changes in cancer is important for the rational design of new therapies. We haverecently shown that background-specific polymorphisms and loci under epigenetic regulationhave a strong effect on cancer susceptibility in a mouse model of astrocytoma. Although thesemice carry mutations in p53 and ras signaling pathways (through mutation of the rasGAPprotein, Nf1), the susceptibility to different tumor types depends strongly on epigeneticregulation and does not show simple Mendelian inheritance. Our results demonstrate theimportance of genome architecture and how tumorigenesis can be accelerated by concomitantloss or gain of multiple genes in a single chromosome rearrangement. Because genomearchitecture is very different between mice and humans, comparing patterns of genomicrearrangement in human cancer and mouse models may help distinguish causal genomic changesfrom correlative changes.     

c-Myc Oncoprotein: Cell Cycle-Related Events and New Therapeutic Challenges in Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases

Advanced stages of both cancer and atherosclerosis are characterized by a local increase in tissue mass that may be hard to control. This increase in tissue mass can be attributed to oxidation-sensitive modification of cell cycle-related events, including cellular proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, which could be secondary to alteration in the activity of tumor suppressor gene and oncogene products. The oncogene c-Myc has classically been considered to be involved in carcinogenesis and has more recently been implicated in both endothelial dysfunction and atherogenesis as well. Consequently, inhibition of c-Myc-dependent signaling has become a novel therapeutic opportunity and challenge in atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular diseases.

Antioxidant strategies, RNA synthesis inhibitors such as mithramycin, and gene therapeutic approaches with antisense oligonucleotides against c-Myc are some of the promising strategies. In general, the increased biologic understanding of the participation of cell cycle events and targeting these events may enable to attenuate or prevent some of the complications of vascular and neoplastic diseases.     

c-Myc oncoprotein: cell cycle-related events and new therapeutic challenges in cancer and cardiovascular diseases

Advanced stages of both cancer and atherosclerosis are characterized by a local increase in tissue mass that may be hard to control. This increase in tissue mass can be attributed to oxidation-sensitive modification of cell cycle-related events, including cellular proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, which could be secondary to alteration in the activity of tumor suppressor gene and oncogene products. The oncogene c-Myc has classically been considered to be involved in carcinogenesis and has more recently been implicated in both endothelial dysfunction and atherogenesis as well. Consequently, inhibition of c-Myc-dependent signaling has become a novel therapeutic opportunity and challenge in atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular diseases. Antioxidant strategies, RNA synthesis inhibitors such as mithramycin, and gene therapeutic approaches with antisense oligonucleotides against c-Myc are some of the promising strategies. In general, the increased biologic understanding of the participation of cell cycle events and targeting these events may enable to attenuate or prevent some of the complications of vascular and neoplastic diseases.