Probing receptor binding activity of interleukin-8 dimer using a disulfide trap

Interleukin-8 (IL-8), a member of the chemokine superfamily, exists as both monomers and dimers, and mediates its function by binding to neutrophil CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors that belong to the G protein-coupled receptor class. It is now well established that the monomer functions as a high-affinity ligand, but the binding affinity of the dimer remains controversial. The approximately 1000-fold difference between monomer-dimer equilibrium constant (microM) and receptor binding constant (nM) of IL-8 does not allow receptor-binding affinity measurements of the native IL-8 dimer. In this study, we overcame this roadblock by creating a "trapped" nondissociating dimer that contains a disulfide bond across the dimer interface at the 2-fold symmetry point. The NMR studies show that the structure of this trapped dimer is indistinguishable from the native dimer. The trapped dimer, compared to a trapped monomer, bound CXCR1 with approximately 70-fold and CXCR2 with approximately 20-fold lower affinities. Receptor binding involves two interactions, between the IL-8 N-loop and receptor N-domain residues, and between IL-8 N-terminal and receptor extracellular loop residues. In contrast to a trapped monomer that bound an isolated CXCR1 N-domain peptide with microM affinity, the trapped dimer failed to show any binding, indicating that dimerization predominantly perturbs the binding of only the N-loop residues. These results demonstrate that only the monomer is a high-affinity ligand for both receptors, and also provide a structural basis for the lower binding affinity of the dimer.     

Monomeric and Dimeric CXCL8 Are Both Essential for In Vivo Neutrophil Recruitment

Rapid mobilization of neutrophils from vasculature to the site of bacterial/viral infections and tissue injury is a critical step in successful resolution of inflammation. The chemokine CXCL8 plays a central role in recruiting neutrophils. A characteristic feature of CXCL8 is its ability to reversibly exist as both monomers and dimers, but whether both forms exist in vivo, and if so, the relevance of each form for in vivo function is not known. In this study, using a ‘trapped’ non-associating monomer and a non-dissociating dimer, we show that (i) wild type (WT) CXCL8 exists as both monomers and dimers, (ii) the in vivo recruitment profiles of the monomer, dimer, and WT are distinctly different, and (iii) the dimer is essential for initial robust recruitment and the WT is most active for sustained recruitment. Using a microfluidic device, we also observe that recruitment is not only dependent on the total amount of CXCL8 but also on the steepness of the gradient, and the gradients created by different CXCL8 variants elicit different neutrophil migratory responses. CXCL8 mediates its function by binding to CXCR2 receptor on neutrophils and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) on endothelial cells. On the basis of our data, we propose that dynamic equilibrium between CXCL8 monomers and dimers and their differential binding to CXCR2 and GAGs mediates and regulates in vivo neutrophil recruitment. Our finding that both CXCL8 monomer and dimer are functional in vivo is novel, and indicates that the CXCL8 monomer-dimer equilibrium and neutrophil recruitment are intimately linked in health and disease.     

Thermodynamic characterization of interleukin-8 monomer binding to CXCR1 receptor N-terminal domain

Chemokines elicit their function by binding receptors of the G-protein-coupled receptor class, and the N-terminal domain (N-domain) of the receptor is one of the two critical ligand-binding sites. In this study, the thermodynamic basis for binding of the chemokine interleukin-8 (IL-8) to the N-domain of its receptor CXCR1 was characterized using isothermal titration calorimetry. We have shown previously that only the monomer of IL-8, and not the dimer, functions as a high-affinity ligand, so in this study we used the IL-8(1-66) deletion mutant which exists as a monomer. Calorimetry data indicate that the binding is enthalpically favored and entropically disfavored, and a negative heat capacity change indicates burial of hydrophobic residues in the complex. A characteristic feature of chemokine receptor N-domains is the large number of acidic residues, and experiments using different buffers show no net proton transfer, indicating that the CXCR1 N-domain acidic residues are not protonated in the binding process. CXCR1 N-domain peptide is unstructured in the free form but adopts a more defined structure in the bound form, and so binding is coupled to induction of the structure of the N-domain. Measurements in the presence of the osmolyte, trimethylamine N-oxide, which induces the structure of unfolded proteins, show that formation of the coupled N-domain structure involves only small DeltaH and DeltaS changes. These results together indicate that the binding is driven by packing interactions in the complex that are enthalpically favored, and are consistent with the observation that the N-domain binds in an extended form and interacts with multiple IL-8 N-loop residues over a large surface area.     

Solution NMR characterization of WT CXCL8 monomer and dimer binding to CXCR1 N‐terminal domain

Chemokine CXCL8 and its receptor CXCR1 are key mediators in combating infection and have also been implicated in the pathophysiology of various diseases including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cancer. CXCL8 exists as monomers and dimers but monomer alone binds CXCR1 with high affinity. CXCL8 function involves binding two distinct CXCR1 sites – the N‐terminal domain (Site‐I) and the extracellular/transmembrane domain (Site‐II). Therefore, higher monomer affinity could be due to stronger binding at Site‐I or Site‐II or both. We have now characterized the binding of a human CXCR1 N‐terminal domain peptide (hCXCR1Ndp) to WT CXCL8 under conditions where it exists as both monomers and dimers. We show that the WT monomer binds the CXCR1 N‐domain with much higher affinity and that binding is coupled to dimer dissociation. We also characterized the binding of two CXCL8 monomer variants and a trapped dimer to two different hCXCR1Ndp constructs, and observe that the monomer binds with ～10‐ to 100‐fold higher affinity than the dimer. Our studies also show that the binding constants of monomer and dimer to the receptor peptides, and the dimer dissociation constant, can vary significantly as a function of pH and buffer, and so the ability to observe WT monomer peaks is critically dependent on NMR experimental conditions. We conclude that the monomer is the high affinity CXCR1 agonist, that Site‐I interactions play a dominant role in determining monomer vs. dimer affinity, and that the dimer plays an indirect role in regulating monomer function.     

Monomeric variants of IL-8: effects of side chain substitutions and solution conditions upon dimer formation.

IL-8 dimers have been observed in NMR and X-ray structures of the protein. We have engineered IL-8 monomers by mutations of residues throughout the dimer interface, which introduce hindrance determinants to dimerization. These IL-8 variants are shown by NMR to have wild-type monomer folding, but by ultracentrifugation to have a range of dimerization constants from microM to mM, as compared with a dimerization constant of about 10 microM for wild-type IL-8, under physiological salt and temperature conditions. The monomeric variants of IL-8 bind the erythrocyte chemokine receptor DARC, as well as the neutrophil IL-8 receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 with affinities similar to that of wild-type IL-8. In addition, the monomeric variants were shown to have agonist activity, with similar potency to wild-type, in both Ca(2+)-flux assays on CXCR1 and CXCR2 transfected cells, and in chemotaxis assays on neutrophils. Thus, these variants confirm that monomeric IL-8 is functionally equivalent to wild-type in vitro assays. We have also investigated the effects of various solution conditions upon IL-8 dimer formation using analytical ultracentrifugation. At salt concentrations, temperatures, and pH conditions lower than physiological, the dimerization affinity of IL-8 is greatly enhanced. This suggests that, under some conditions, IL-8 dimer formation may occur at concentrations of IL-8 considerably lower than 10 microM, with consequences in vivo that are yet to be determined.     

IL-8 single-chain homodimers and heterodimers: interactions with chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR2, and DARC.

Covalent single-chain dimers of the chemokine interleukin-8 (IL-8) have been designed to mimic the dimeric form of IL-8 in solution and facilitate the production of heterodimer variants of IL-8. Physical studies indicated that use of a simple peptide linker to join two subunits, while allowing receptor binding and activation, led to self-association of the tethered dimers. However, addition of a single disulfide crosslink between the tethered subunits prevented this multimer from forming, yielding a species of dimer molecular weight. Crosslinked single-chain dimers bind to both IL-8 neutrophil receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 as well as to DARC, as does a double disulfide-linked dimer with no peptide linker. In addition, neutrophil response to these dimers as measured by chemotaxis or beta-glucuronidase release is similar to that elicited by wild-type IL-8, providing evidence that the dissociation of the dimeric species is not required for these biologically relevant activities. Finally, through construction of single-chain heterodimer mutants, we show that only the first subunit's ELR motif is the single-chain variants.     

The Specific Monomer/Dimer Equilibrium of the Corticotropin-releasing Factor Receptor Type 1 Is Established in the Endoplasmic Reticulum

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the most important drug targets. Although the smallest functional unit of a GPCR is a monomer, it became clear in the past decades that the vast majority of the receptors form dimers. Only very recently, however, data were presented that some receptors may in fact be expressed as a mixture of monomers and dimers and that the interaction of the receptor protomers is dynamic. To date, equilibrium measurements were restricted to the plasma membrane due to experimental limitations. We have addressed the question as to where this equilibrium is established for the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1. By developing a novel approach to analyze single molecule fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy data for intracellular membrane compartments, we show that the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 has a specific monomer/dimer equilibrium that is already established in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). It remains constant at the plasma membrane even following receptor activation. Moreover, we demonstrate for seven additional GPCRs that they are expressed in specific but substantially different monomer/dimer ratios. Although it is well known that proteins may dimerize in the ER in principle, our data show that the ER is also able to establish the specific monomer/dimer ratios of GPCRs, which sheds new light on the functions of this compartment.     

Chemokine oligomerization and interactions with receptors and glycosaminoglycans: the role of structural dynamics in function

The first chemokine structure, that of IL-8/CXCL8, was determined in 1990. Since then, many chemokine structures have emerged. To the initial disappointment of structural biologists, the tertiary structures of these small proteins were found to be highly conserved. However, they have since proven to be much more interesting and diverse than originally expected. Somewhat like lego blocks, many chemokines oligomerize and there is significant diversity in their oligomeric forms and propensity to oligomerize. Chemokines not only interact with receptors where different oligomeric forms can induce different signaling responses, they also interact with glycosaminoglycans which can stabilize oligomers and other structures that would not otherwise form in solution. Although chemokine monomers and dimers yielded quickly to structure determination, structural information about larger chemokine oligomers, chemokines receptors, and complexes of chemokines with glycosaminoglycans and receptors has been more difficult to obtain, but recent breakthroughs suggest that this information will be forthcoming, especially with receptor structures. Equally important and challenging, will be efforts to correlate the structural information with function.     

How do chemokines navigate neutrophils to the target site: Dissecting the structural mechanisms and signaling pathways

Chemokines play crucial roles in combating microbial infection and initiating tissue repair by recruiting neutrophils in a timely and coordinated manner. In humans, no less than seven chemokines (CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL7, and CXCL8) and two receptors (CXCR1 and CXCR2) mediate neutrophil functions but in a context dependent manner. Neutrophil-activating chemokines reversibly exist as monomers and dimers, and their receptor binding triggers conformational changes that are coupled to G-protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways. G-protein signaling activates a variety of effectors including Ca²⁺ channels and phospholipase C. β-arrestin serves as a multifunctional adaptor and is coupled to several signaling hubs including MAP kinase and tyrosine kinase pathways. Both G-protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways play important non-overlapping roles in neutrophil trafficking and activation. Functional studies have established many similarities but distinct differences for a given chemokine and between chemokines at the level of monomer vs. dimer, CXCR1 vs. CXCR2 activation, and G-protein vs. β-arrestin pathways. We propose that two forms of the ligand binding two receptors and activating two signaling pathways enables fine-tuned neutrophil function compared to a single form, a single receptor, or a single pathway. We summarize the current knowledge on the molecular mechanisms by which chemokine monomers/dimers activate CXCR1/CXCR2 and how these interactions trigger G-protein/β-arrestin-coupled signaling pathways. We also discuss current challenges and knowledge gaps, and likely advances in the near future that will lead to a better understanding of the relationship between the chemokine-CXCR1/CXCR2-G-protein/β-arrestin axis and neutrophil function.     

Glycosaminoglycans interact selectively with chemokines and modulate receptor binding and cellular responses.

Chemokines selectively recruit and activate a variety of cells during inflammation. Interactions between cell surface glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and chemokines drive the formation of haptotactic or immobilized gradients of chemokines at the site of inflammation, directing this recruitment. Chemokines bind to glycosaminoglycans on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with affinities in the micromolar range: RANTES > MCP-1 > IL-8 > MIP-1alpha. This binding can be competed with by soluble glycosaminoglycans: heparin, heparin sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, and dermatan sulfate. RANTES binding showed the widest discrimination between glycosaminoglycans (700-fold), whereas MIP-1alpha was the least selective. Almost identical results were obtained in an assay using heparin sulfate beads as the source of immobilized glycosaminoglycan. The binding of chemokines to glycosaminoglycan fragments has a strong length dependence, and optimally requires both N- and O-sulfation. Isothermal titration calorimetry data confirm these results; IL-8 binds heparin fragments with a K(d) of 0.39-2.63 microM, and requires five saccharide units to bind each monomer of chemokine. In membranes from cells expressing the G-protein-coupled chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR2, and CCR1, soluble GAGs inhibit the binding of chemokine ligands to their receptors. Consistent with this, heparin and heparin sulfate could inhibit IL-8-induced neutrophil calcium flux. Chemokines can therefore form complexes with both cell surface and soluble GAGs; these interactions have different functions. Soluble GAG chemokines complexes are unable to bind the receptor, resulting in a block of the biological activity. Previously, we have shown that cell surface GAGs present chemokines to the G-protein-coupled receptors, by increasing the local concentration of protein. A model is presented which brings together all of these data. The selectivity in the chemokine-GAG interaction suggests selective disruption of the haptotactic gradient may be an achievable therapeutic approach in inflammatory disease.     

Structure of a CXC chemokine-receptor fragment in complex with interleukin-8.

BACKGROUND: Interactions between CXC chemokines (e.g. interleukin-8, IL-8) and their receptors (e.g. CXCR-1) have a key role in host defense and disease by attracting and upregulating neutrophils to sites of inflammation. The transmembrane nature of the receptor impedes structure-based understanding of ligand interactions. Linear peptides based on the N-terminal, extracellular portion of the receptor CXCR-1 do bind to IL-8, however, and inhibit the binding of IL-8 to the full-length receptor. RESULTS: The NMR solution structure of the complex formed between IL-8 and one such receptor-based peptide indicates that a cleft between a loop and a beta hairpin constitute part of the receptor interaction surface on IL-8. Nine residues from the C terminus of the receptor peptide (corresponding to Pro21-Pro29 of CXCR-1) occupy the cleft in an extended fashion. Intermolecular contacts are mostly hydrophobic and sidechain mediated. CONCLUSIONS: The results offer the first details at an atomic level of the interaction between a chemokine and its receptor. Consideration of other biochemical data allow extrapolation to a model for the interaction of IL-8 with the full-length receptor. In this model, the heparin-binding residues of IL-8 are exposed, thereby allowing presentation of the chemokine from endothelial cell-surface glycosaminoglycans. This first glimpse of how IL-8 binds to its receptor provides a foundation for the structure-based design of chemokine antagonists.     

The dynamics of interleukin‐8 and its interaction with human CXC receptor I peptide

Interleukin‐8 (CXCL8, IL‐8) is a proinflammatory chemokine important for the regulation of inflammatory and immune responses via its interaction with G‐protein coupled receptors, including CXC receptor 1 (CXCR1). CXCL8 exists as both a monomer and as a dimer at physiological concentrations, yet the molecular basis of CXCL8 interaction with its receptor as well as the importance of CXCL8 dimer formation remain poorly characterized. Although several biological studies have indicated that both the CXCL8 monomer and dimer are active, biophysical studies have reported conflicting results regarding the binding of CXCL8 to CXCR1. To clarify this problem, we expressed and purified a peptide (hCXCR1pep) corresponding to the N‐terminal region of human CXCR1 (hCXCR1) and utilized nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to interrogate the binding of wild‐type CXCL8 and a previously reported mutant (CXCL8M) that stabilizes the monomeric form. Our data reveal that the CXCL8 monomer engages hCXCR1pep with a slightly higher affinity than the CXCL8 dimer, but that the CXCL8 dimer does not dissociate upon binding hCXCR1pep. These investigations also showed that CXCL8 is dynamic on multiple timescales, which may help explain the versatility in this interleukin for engaging its target receptors.     

The human CC chemokine MIP-1beta dimer is not competent to bind to the CCR5 receptor

Chemokine dimerization has been the subject of much interest in recent years as evidence has accumulated that different quaternary states of chemokines play different biological roles; the monomer is believed to be the receptor-binding unit, whereas the dimer has been implicated in binding cell surface glycosaminoglycans. However, although several studies have provided evidence for this paradigm by making monomeric chemokine variants or dimer-impaired chemokines, few have provided direct evidence of the receptor function of a chemokine dimer. We have produced a covalent dimer of the CC chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta (MIP-1beta) by placing a disulfide bond at the center of its dimer interface through a single amino acid substitution (MIP-1beta-A10C). This variant was shown to be a nondissociating dimer by SDS-PAGE and analytical ultracentrifugation. NMR reveals a structure largely the same as the wild type protein. In studies of glycosaminoglycan binding, MIP-1beta-A10C binds to a heparin-Sepharose column as tightly as the wild type protein and more tightly than monomeric variants. However, MIP-1beta-A10C neither binds nor activates the MIP-1beta receptor CCR5. It was found that the ability to activate CCR5 was recovered upon reduction of the intermolecular disulfide cross-link by incubation with 1 mm dithiothreitol. This work provides the first definitive evidence that the CC chemokine MIP-1beta dimer is not able to bind or activate its receptor and implicates the CC chemokine monomer as the sole receptor-interacting unit.     

Dimer dissociation of the pore-forming toxin aerolysin precedes receptor binding

The pore-forming toxin aerolysin is secreted by Aeromonas hydrophila as an inactive precursor. Based on chemical cross-linking and gel filtration, we show here that proaerolysin exists as a monomer at low concentrations but is dimeric above 0.1 mg/ml. At intermediate concentrations, monomers and dimers appeared to be in rapid equilibrium. All together our data indicate that, at low concentrations, the toxin is a monomer and that this species is competent for receptor binding. In contrast, a mutant toxin that forms a covalent dimer was unable to bind to target cells.     

Transepithelial neutrophil migration is CXCR1 dependent in vitro and is defective in IL-8 receptor knockout mice

Neutrophil migration across infected mucosal surfaces is chemokine dependent, but the role of chemokine receptors has not been investigated. In this study, chemokine receptors were shown to be expressed by epithelial cells lining the urinary tract, and to play an essential role for neutrophil migration across the mucosal barrier. Uroepithelial CXCR1 and CXCR2 expression was detected in human urinary tract biopsies, and in vitro infection of human uroepithelial cell lines caused a dramatic increase in both receptors. As a consequence, there was higher binding of IL-8 to the cells and the IL-8-dependent neutrophil migration across the infected epithelial cell layers was enhanced. Abs to IL-8 or to the CXCR1 receptor inhibited this increase by 60% (p<0.004), but anti-CXCR2 Abs had no effect, suggesting that CXCR1 was the more essential receptor in this process. Similar observations were made in the mouse urinary tract, where experimental infection stimulated epithelial expression of the murine IL-8 receptor, followed by a rapid flux of neutrophils into the lumen. IL-8 receptor knockout mice, in contrast, failed to express the receptor, their neutrophils were unable to cross the epithelial barrier, and accumulated in massive numbers in the tissues. These results demonstrate that epithelial cells express CXC receptors and that infection increases receptor expression. Furthermore, we show that CXCR1 is required for neutrophil migration across infected epithelial cell layers in vitro, and that the murine IL-8 receptor is needed for neutrophils to cross the infected mucosa of the urinary tract in vivo.     

Probing the Role of CXC Motif in Chemokine CXCL8 for High Affinity Binding and Activation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 Receptors

All chemokines share a common structural scaffold that mediate a remarkable variety of functions from immune surveillance to organogenesis. Chemokines are classified as CXC or CC on the basis of conserved cysteines, and the two subclasses bind distinct sets of GPCR class of receptors and also have markedly different quaternary structures, suggesting that the CXC/CC motif plays a prominent role in both structure and function. For both classes, receptor activation involves interactions between chemokine N-loop and receptor N-domain residues (Site-I), and between chemokine N-terminal and receptor extracellular/transmembrane residues (Site-II). We engineered a CC variant (labeled as CC-CXCL8) of the chemokine CXCL8 by deleting residue X (CXC → CC), and found its structure is essentially similar to WT. In stark contrast, CC-CXCL8 bound poorly to its cognate receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 (K_i > 1 μm). Further, CC-CXCL8 failed to mobilize Ca²⁺ in CXCR2-expressing HL-60 cells or recruit neutrophils in a mouse lung model. However, most interestingly, CC-CXCL8 mobilizes Ca²⁺ in neutrophils and in CXCR1-expressing HL-60 cells. Compared with the WT, CC-CXCL8 binds CXCR1 N-domain with only ∼5-fold lower affinity indicating that the weak binding to intact CXCR1 must be due to its weak binding at Site-II. Nevertheless, this level of binding is sufficient for receptor activation indicating that affinity and activity are separable functions. We propose that the CXC motif functions as a conformational switch that couples Site-I and Site-II interactions for both receptors, and that this coupling is critical for high affinity binding but differentially regulates activation.     

Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer reveals ligand-induced conformational changes in CXCR4 homo- and heterodimers

Homo- and heterodimerization have emerged as prominent features of G-protein-coupled receptors with possible impact on the regulation of their activity. Using a sensitive bioluminescence resonance energy transfer system, we investigated the formation of CXCR4 and CCR2 chemokine receptor dimers. We found that both receptors exist as constitutive homo- and heterodimers and that ligands induce conformational changes within the pre-formed dimers without promoting receptor dimer formation or disassembly. Ligands with different intrinsic efficacies yielded distinct bioluminescence resonance energy transfer modulations, indicating the stabilization of distinct receptor conformations. We also found that peptides derived from the transmembrane domains of CXCR4 inhibited activation of this receptor by blocking the ligand-induced conformational transitions of the dimer. Taken together, our data support a model in which chemokine receptor homo- and heterodimers form spontaneously and respond to ligand binding as units that undergo conformational changes involving both protomers even when only one of the two ligand binding sites is occupied.     

Novel use of an osmolyte to dissect multiple thermodynamic linkages in a chemokine ligand-receptor system

We have used trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a protecting osmolyte, to dissect the complex thermodynamic linkages involved in the interaction between the chemokine interleukin-8 (IL-8) and the N-domain of its receptor CXCR1. Our results show that TMAO induces folding in the CXCR1 receptor N-domain and that the N-domain upon folding binds ligand with higher affinity. This represents, to our knowledge, the smallest domain that has been shown to be folded in osmolyte. Using the phase diagram method to analyze this thermodynamic relationship graphically, we also observe that TMAO favors ligand dimerization and that the dimeric ligand binds the receptor domain with lower affinity. We have thus been able to dissect coupling among three distinct processes, receptor domain folding, ligand dimerization, and ligand-receptor domain binding in this chemokine-receptor system. We also observe that the affinity of the related chemokine, melanoma growth stimulatory activity (MGSA), increases concurrent with N-domain folding similar to IL-8 but shows more profound differences on ligand dimerization. These studies establish a novel and innovative use of osmolytes to dissect linkages among different processes and exploit the phase diagram as a tool to graphically represent and dissect complex thermodynamic relationships in biological systems. On the basis of our observations and earlier work, we discuss the relevance of ligand dimerization in chemokine regulation.     

Functional equivalence of monomeric and dimeric forms of purified acetylcholine receptors from Torpedo californica in reconstituted lipid vesicles

Acetylcholine receptors from Torpedo californica electric organ were solubilized and purified under conditions which prevent inactivation of the agonist-regulated cation channels. The dimer form of the receptors was preserved during purification. Treatment with reducing agents converted dimers into monomers. Receptor monomers and dimers were separately reconstituted into soybean lipid vesicles by the cholate dialysis technique. Reconstituted monomers and dimers were functionally equivalent with respect to their carbamylcholine-induced dose-dependent uptake of 22Na+, the total flux of 22Na+ per receptor during the permeability response, and the occurrence of desensitization. Evidence against non-covalent association of monomers to produce dimeric functional units was obtained using glutaraldehyde as a crosslinking agent. These results show that both the acetylcholine-binding sites and the agonist-regulated cation-specific channel are contained within the alpha 2 beta gamma delta subunit structure of the acetylcholine receptor monomer.     

Cooperative binding mode of the inhibitors of R6K replication, pi dimers

The replication initiator protein, π, plays an essential role in the initiation of plasmid R6K replication. Both monomers and dimers of π bind to iterons in the γ origin of plasmid R6K, yet monomers facilitate open complex formation, while dimers, the predominant form in the cell, do not. Consequently, π monomers activate replication, while π dimers inhibit replication. Recently, it was shown that the monomeric form of π binds multiple tandem iterons in a strongly cooperative fashion, which might explain how monomers outcompete dimers for replication initiation when plasmid copy number and π supply are low. Here, we examine cooperative binding of π dimers and explore the role that these interactions may have in the inactivation of γ origin. To examine π dimer/iteron interactions in the absence of competing π monomer/iteron interactions using wild-type π, constructs were made with key base changes to each iteron that eliminate π monomer binding yet have no impact on π dimer binding. Our results indicate that, in the absence of π monomers, π dimers bind with greater cooperativity to alternate iterons than to adjacent iterons, thus preferentially leaving intervening iterons unbound and the origin unsaturated. We discuss new insights into plasmid replication control by π dimers.