Importance of B-cell responses for immunological control of variant strains of simian immunodeficiency virus

The properties of three variants of cloned simian immunodeficiency virus strain 239 (SIV239) were compared. One strain (M5) lacked five sites for N-linked carbohydrate attachment in variable regions 1 and 2 (V1 and V2) of the gp120 envelope protein, one strain (DeltaV1-V2) completely lacked V1 and V2 sequences, and another (316) had nine mutations in the envelope that impart high replicative capacity for tissue macrophages. All three strains were capable of significant levels of fusion independent of CD4, and all three were considerably more sensitive to antibody-mediated neutralization than the parent strain from which they were derived. Upon experimental infection of rhesus monkeys, these three variant strains replicated to viral loads at peak height around day 14 that were indistinguishable from or only slightly less than those observed in monkeys infected with the parental SIV239 strain. Viral loads at the set point 20 to 50 weeks after infection, however, were more than 400- to 10,000-fold lower with the variant strains. Depletion of B cells around the time of infection with M5 resulted in less effective immunological control and much higher viral loads at the set point in two of three monkeys. The differences between SIV239 infection, where there is not effective immunological control, and SIVM5 infection, where there is effective immunological control, cannot be easily explained by differences in the inherent replicative capacity of the viruses; rather, they are more readily explained by differences in the effectiveness of the antibody response. These results suggest that resistance of SIV239 to antibody-mediated neutralization is very important for evading effective immunological control, for allowing continuous viral replication, for maintenance of moderate-to-high viral loads at set point, and for disease progression.     

Ability of the V3 loop of simian immunodeficiency virus to serve as a target for antibody-mediated neutralization: correlation of neutralization sensitivity, growth in macrophages, and decreased dependence on CD4

To better define the effects of sequence variation and tropism on the ability of the simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac V3 loop to act as a target of antibody-mediated neutralization, a series of experiments were performed. Three SIV strains, SIVmac239, SIVmac316, and SIVmac155/T3, each with defined differences in env sequence and tropism, were used to construct a panel of viruses chimeric for a portion of envelope that includes the V2 and V3 regions. Peptides with sequences corresponding to the V3 loops of the parental viruses were used to immunize rabbits. The polyclonal rabbit antibodies and plasma from SIVmac239-infected animals were then used to assess the neutralization sensitivity of the parental and chimeric viruses. One of the parental viruses, SIVmac316, which is able to replicate to high titer in alveolar macrophages and can infect cells in a CD4-independent fashion, was highly sensitive to neutralization by plasma from SIVmac-infected rhesus macaques, with average 50% neutralization titers of 1:20,480; this same strain was also sensitive to neutralization by the anti-V3 loop peptide sera. Other parental and chimeric viruses were less sensitive to neutralization with this same panel of antibodies, but as seen with SIVmac316, those viruses that were able to productively replicate in alveolar macrophages were more sensitive to antibody-mediated neutralization. To further define the amino acids involved in increased sensitivity to neutralization, a panel of viruses was constructed by changing envelope residues in SIVmac316 to the corresponding SIVmac239 amino acids. The increased neutralization sensitivity observed for SIVmac316 was mapped principally to three amino acid changes spread throughout gp120. In addition, the increased sensitivity to neutralization by V3-directed antibodies correlated with the ability of the various viruses to replicate to high levels in alveolar macrophage cultures and a CD4-negative cell line, BC7/CCR5. These results demonstrate that the V3 loop of SIVmac Env can act as an efficient target of neutralizing antibodies in a fashion that is highly dependent on sequence context. In addition, these studies suggest a correlation between decreased dependence on CD4 and increased sensitivity to antibody-mediated neutralization.     

A replication-competent, neutralization-sensitive variant of simian immunodeficiency virus lacking 100 amino acids of envelope

Coding sequences for the first two variable loops of the gp120 envelope glycoprotein were removed from simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) strain 239 (SIVmac239). This deletion encompassed 100 amino acids. The resulting virus replicated poorly after transfection into immortalized T-cell lines, with peak replication occurring only after 25 to 30 days. Limited passaging of SIVmac239DeltaV1V2 in cultures gave rise to a variant which had significantly improved replication kinetics but which retained the original 100-amino-acid deletion in gp120. Cloning and sequencing revealed 11 changes in the envelope, including amino acid substitutions in both gp120 (5 substitutions) and gp41(6 substitutions). Four of the five changes in gp120 are predicted to lie within and around the putative coreceptor binding domain, a region which is believed to be covered by the V1 and V2 loops in the native envelope complex. Analysis of recombinant clones surprisingly revealed that the changes in gp41 were sufficient to overcome the replication deficiency created by deletion of the V1 and V2 loops from gp120. The SIVmac239DeltaV1V2 envelope displayed a significant reduction in its ability to mediate cell-cell fusion, and the infectious titer of SIVmac239DeltaV1V2 was approximately four- to eightfold lower than that of parental SIVmac239. Although SIVmac239 is strongly dependent on both CD4 and a coreceptor for entry, envelope protein lacking the V1 and V2 loops was able to mediate fusion with CD4(-) CCR5(+) cells at 60% the level observed with CD4(+) CCR5(+) cells. Plasma from SIVmac239-infected monkeys was at least 100 to 1,000 times more effective at neutralizing SIVmac239DeltaV1V2 than SIVmac239. These results demonstrate the dispensability of the V1-V2 sequences of SIVmac239 for viral replication, a role for V1 and V2 in shielding the coreceptor binding region of the envelope, and the extreme sensitivity of a SIV lacking these sequences to antibody-mediated neutralization.     

CD4 independence of simian immunodeficiency virus Envs is associated with macrophage tropism, neutralization sensitivity, and attenuated pathogenicity

To investigate the basis for envelope (Env) determinants influencing simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) tropism, we studied a number of Envs that are closely related to that of SIVmac239, a pathogenic, T-tropic virus that is neutralization resistant. The Envs from macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) virus strains SIVmac316, 1A11, 17E-Fr, and 1100 facilitated infection of CCR5-positive, CD4-negative cells. In contrast, the SIVmac239 Env was strictly dependent upon the presence of CD4 for membrane fusion. We also found that the Envs from M-tropic virus strains, which are less pathogenic in vivo, were very sensitive to antibody-mediated neutralization. Antibodies to the V3-loop, as well as antibodies that block SIV gp120 binding to CCR5, efficiently neutralized CD4-independent, M-tropic Envs but not the 239 Env. However, triggering the 239 Env with soluble CD4, presumably resulting in exposure of the CCR5 binding site, made it as neutralization sensitive as the M-tropic Envs. In addition, mutations of N-linked glycosylation sites in the V1/V2 region, previously shown to enhance antigenicity and immunogenicity, made the 239 Env partially CD4 independent. These findings indicate that Env-based determinants of M tropism of these strains are generally associated with decreased dependence on CD4 for entry into cells. Furthermore, CD4 independence and M tropism are also associated with neutralization sensitivity and reduced pathogenicity, suggesting that the humoral immune response may exert strong selective pressure against CD4-independent M-tropic SIVmac strains. Finally, genetic modification of viral Envs to enhance CD4 independence may also result in improved humoral immune responses.     

Virion envelope content, infectivity, and neutralization sensitivity of simian immunodeficiency virus

A truncating E767stop mutation was introduced into the envelope glycoprotein of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) strain SIV239-M5 (moderately sensitive to antibody-mediated neutralization and lacking five sites for N-linked carbohydrate attachment) and strain SIV316 (very sensitive to neutralization, with eight amino acid changes from the neutralization-resistant parental molecular clone, SIV239). The truncating mutation increased Env content in virions, increased infectivity, and decreased sensitivity to antibody-mediated neutralization in both strains. However, the magnitude of the effect on infectivity and neutralization sensitivity differed considerably between the two strains. In the context of strain SIV239-M5, truncation increased Env content in virions approximately 10-fold and infectivity in a reporter cell assay 24-fold. The truncated SIV239-M5 was only slightly more resistant to neutralization by polyclonal monkey sera and by monoclonal antibodies than SIV239-M5 with a full-length envelope glycoprotein. In the context of strain SIV316, truncation increased infectivity a dramatic 480-fold, while envelope content in virions was increased only about 14-fold. This dramatic increase in infectivity cannot be simply explained by the increase in envelope content and is likely due to an increase in inherent infectivity, i.e., infectivity per spike, that results from truncation. The truncated SIV316 was extremely resistant to antibody-mediated neutralization. In fact, it was not neutralized by any of the antibodies tested. When increasing amounts of SIV316 envelope glycoprotein (full length) were provided in trans to SIV316, infectivity was increased and sensitivity to neutralization was decreased, but to nowhere near the degree that was obtained when truncated SIV316 envelope glycoprotein was used. Truncated forms of SIV239 and SIV239-M5 required higher levels of soluble CD4 for inhibition of infection than their nontruncated forms; truncated SIV316 did not. Our results suggest that envelope content in SIV virions, infectivity, and resistance to antibody-mediated neutralization can be increased not only by truncation of the cytoplasmic domain but also by provision of excess envelope in trans. The striking increase in infectivity that results from truncation in the context of SIV316 appears to be due principally to an increase in inherent infectivity per spike.     

Assorted mutations in the envelope gene of simian immunodeficiency virus lead to loss of neutralization resistance against antibodies representing a broad spectrum of specificities

Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) of macaques isolate SIVmac239 is highly resistant to neutralization by polyclonal antisera or monoclonal antibodies, a property that it shares with most primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). This resistance is important for the ability of the virus to persist at high levels in vivo. To explore the physical features of the viral envelope complex that contribute to the neutralization-resistant phenotype, we examined a panel of SIVmac239 derivatives for sensitivity to neutralization by a large collection of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). These MAbs recognize both linear and conformational epitopes throughout the viral envelope proteins. The variant viruses included three derivatives of SIVmac239 with substitutions in specific N-linked glycosylation sites of gp120 and a fourth variant that lacked the 100 amino acids that encompass the V1 and V2 loops. Also included in this study was SIVmac316, a variant of SIVmac239 with distributed mutations in env that confer significantly increased replicative capacity in tissue macrophages. These viruses were chosen to represent a broad range of neutralization sensitivities based on susceptibility to pooled, SIV-positive plasma. All three of these very different kinds of mutations (amino acid substitutions, elimination of N-glycan attachment sites, and a 100-amino-acid deletion spanning variable loops V1 and V2) dramatically increased sensitivity to neutralization by MAbs from multiple competition groups. Thus, the mutations did not simply expose localized epitopes but rather conferred global increases in neutralization sensitivity. The removal of specific N-glycan attachment sites from V1 and V2 led to increased sensitivity to neutralization by antibodies recognizing epitopes from both within and outside of the V1-V2 sequence. Surprisingly, while most of the mutations that gave rise to increased sensitivity were located in the N-terminal half of gp120 (surface subunit [SU]), the greatest increases in sensitivity were to MAbs recognizing the C-terminal half of gp120 or the ectodomain of gp41 (transmembrane subunit [TM]). This reagent set and information should now be useful for defining the physical, structural, thermodynamic, and kinetic factors that influence relative sensitivity to antibody-mediated neutralization.     

Characterization of Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Envelope Glycoprotein Epitopes Recognized by Neutralizing Antibodies from Infected Monkeys

We characterized human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein epitopes recognized by neutralizing antibodies from monkeys recently infected by molecularly cloned simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) variants. The early neutralizing antibody response in each infected animal was directed mainly against a single epitope. This primary neutralizing epitope, however, differed among individual monkeys infected by identical viruses. Two such neutralization epitopes were determined by sequences in the V2 and V3 loops of the gp120 envelope glycoprotein, while a third neutralization epitope, apparently discontinuous, was determined by both V2 and V3 sequences. These results indicate that the early neutralizing antibody response in SHIV-infected monkeys is monospecific and directed against epitopes composed of the gp120 V2 and V3 variable loops.     

An epitope in the V1 domain of the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) gp120 protein is recognized by CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes from an SIV-infected rhesus macaque.

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses against the external envelope glycoprotein (gp120) of the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) were studied in a rhesus macaque infected with SIVmac/239. CD8+ T cells enriched from concanavalin A-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells lysed autologous target cells infected with recombinant vaccinia virus vectors expressing the SIVmac/239 or SIVsm/H4 envelope protein, which share approximately 80% identity in amino acid sequence. A CD8+ CTL line derived by limiting dilution culture of the concanavalin A-stimulated lymphocytes was also specific for the envelope proteins of both SIV isolates. Mapping studies revealed that this cell line recognized an epitope between amino acids 113 and 121 (CNKSETDRW) in the V1 domain of gp120. Amino acid substitutions are observed at positions 116 and 120 among viruses of the SIVsm/mac/human immunodeficiency virus type 2 group, and thus synthetic peptides representing these variants were tested for the ability to sensitize target cells for lysis by the CTL line. Autologous target cells sensitized with a synthetic peptide representing the SIVmac/239 sequence were efficiently killed. In contrast, recognition of target cells was reduced or abolished when peptides representing the amino acid substitutions at position 116 or 120 of other SIVmac, SIVsm, SIVmne, or SIVstm strains were tested. Further studies of CTL responses against this epitope could provide insights into mechanisms of variability within the gp120 V1 domain and its importance in evasion of immunity in infected or vaccinated monkeys.     

Replication and neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 lacking the V1 and V2 variable loops of the gp120 envelope glycoprotein.

A human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) mutant lacking the V1 and V2 variable loops in the gp120 exterior envelope glycoprotein replicated in Jurkat lymphocytes with only modest delays compared with the wild-type virus. Revertants that replicated with wild-type efficiency rapidly emerged and contained only a few amino acid changes in the envelope glycoproteins compared with the parent virus. Both the parent and revertant viruses exhibited increased sensitivity to neutralization by antibodies directed against the V3 loop or a CD4-induced epitope on gp120 but not by soluble CD4 or an antibody against the CD4 binding site. This result demonstrates the role of the gp120 V1 and V2 loops in protecting HIV-1 from some subsets of neutralizing antibodies.     

Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) Envelope-Specific Fabs with High-Level Homologous Neutralizing Activity: Recovery from a Long-Term-Nonprogressor SIV-Infected Macaque

An antibody phage display library was constructed from RNA extracted from lymph node cells of a simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected long-term-nonprogressor macaque. Seven gp120-reactive Fabs were obtained by selection of the library against SIV monomeric gp120. Although each of the Fabs was unique in sequence, there were two distinct groups based on epitope recognition, neutralizing activity in vitro, and molecular analysis. Group 1 Fabs did not neutralize SIV and bound to a linear epitope in the V3 loop of the SIV envelope. In contrast, two of the group 2 Fabs neutralized homologous, neutralization-sensitive SIVsm isolates with high efficiency but failed to neutralize heterologous SIVmac isolates. Based on competition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with mouse monoclonal antibodies of known specificity, these Fabs reacted with a conformational epitope that includes domains V3 and V4 of the SIV envelope. These neutralizing and nonneutralizing Fabs provide valuable standardized and renewable reagents for studying the role of antibody in preventing or modifying SIV infection in vivo.     

Introduction of Exogenous Epitopes in the Variable Regions of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein: Effect on Viral Infectivity and the Neutralization Phenotype

In this study we examined whether human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is equally susceptible to neutralization by a given antibody when the epitope of this antibody is introduced at different positions within the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env). To this end, we introduced two exogenous “epitope tags” at different locations within three major Env regions in two distinct HIV-1 isolates. We examined how the introduction of the exogenous epitopes affects Env expression, Env incorporation into virions, Env fusogenic potential, and viral susceptibility to neutralization. Our data indicate that even within the same Env region, the exact positioning of the epitope impacts the susceptibility of the virus to neutralization by the antibody that binds to that epitope. Our data also indicate that even if the same epitope is introduced in the exact same position on two different Envs, its exposure and, as a result, the neutralization susceptibility of the virus, can be very different. In contrast to the findings of previous studies conducted with HIV-1 isolates other than those used here, but in agreement with results obtained with simian immunodeficiency virus, we observed that tagging of the fourth variable region of Env (V4) did not result in neutralization by the anti-tag antibodies. Our data indicate that epitopes in V4 are not properly exposed within the functional HIV-1 trimeric Env spike, suggesting that V4 may not be a good target for vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies.The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein (Env) is expressed as a heavily glycosylated peptide of approximately 160 kDa (gp160), which is cleaved intracellularly into two noncovalently associated subunits: an extracellular subunit (gp120), responsible for CD4 and coreceptor (primarily CCR5 and/or CXCR4) binding, and a transmembrane subunit (gp41) that mediates fusion between viral and host cell membranes. Based on amino acid sequence homology analysis of gp120s derived from diverse HIV-1 isolates, gp120 is divided into five “constant” regions (C1 to C5) and five “variable” regions (also called “loops,” because most of them have cysteines in the N and C termini that form disulfide bonds). Despite their extensive amino acid variability, the variable loops of gp120 play central roles during the entry of the virus into the cell, for instance, by directly or indirectly modulating the interaction of Env with coreceptor molecules on the target surfaces during virus-cell fusion. They also offer protection from neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) by various mechanisms. The variable loops themselves are targets of NAbs, and during infection, the replicating virus accumulates mutations in the variable regions that allow it to escape the action of anti-variable loop-directed NAbs, while at the same time the variable loops are positioned within the Env trimer so that they prevent, or minimize, the binding of NAbs to more-conserved epitopes, such as the receptor and coreceptor binding sites (4, 5, 12, 15, 20, 23, 25, 27, 31).HIV-1 strains display distinct neutralization phenotypes. Some isolates, such as SF162, are generally susceptible to NAbs that bind to many distinct regions of Env, including the variable regions, while other isolates, such as YU2 or JRFL, are generally resistant to neutralization by the same NAbs (1). It has been proposed that irrespective of the overall neutralizing phenotype of HIV-1 isolates, the binding of only a single antibody per Env trimer on the virion surface can lead to neutralization, when all Env trimers present on the virion surface are bound by at least one antibody (32). This important observation also implies that the epitope specificity of an antibody may not be as important for neutralization as its ability to bind to its target within the trimeric Env structure. In fact, antibodies to diverse regions of Env, such as V1, V2, V3, and the receptor and coreceptor binding sites, can all neutralize HIV-1 (1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 18, 20, 23, 25, 27, 29, 30).In many cases, a given isolate will not be equally susceptible to neutralization by NAbs that bind to different Env regions, for example, the V3 loop and the CD4-binding site (CD4-BS). Whether differences in the neutralizing potentials of two antibodies that bind to distinct epitopes on HIV-1 Env are due to differences in the binding affinities of the two antibodies or whether they occur because the viruses are intrinsically more susceptible to NAbs that bind certain epitopes and not others (i.e., the relative importance of the various regions of Env in Env function and virus neutralization sensitivity differs) is not yet fully understood. One way to address these issues is to introduce small non-HIV Env amino acid sequences (tags) that are targets of known monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) at various positions within the viral Env and to examine how the placement of the same epitope at different positions within Env affects the neutralization phenotype of the virus.Foreign epitopes have been introduced into the variable regions of HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Envs, and their effects on viral neutralization potential have been examined (14, 19, 22, 33). Yang and colleagues (33) introduced the FLAG epitope into the V4 regions of three HIV-1 isolates (YU2, JRFL, and HxB2) displaying distinct neutralization phenotypes in response to anti-HIV NAbs; they found that all three pseudotyped viruses were equivalently neutralized by an anti-FLAG MAb. One important implication of that study is that neutralization-resistant isolates, such as YU2 or JRFL, are not intrinsically more resistant to neutralization than more-susceptible isolates, such as HxB2, so long as the antibody binds to its epitope on the functional virion-associated Env spike. A second implication is that since the FLAG epitope was exposed in the V4 loops of all three isolates, the V4 loop could theoretically be a good target for vaccine-elicited antibodies. In contrast, Pantophlet et al. (19) introduced the HA tag into various regions of the JRCSF (neutralization-resistant) and HxB2 (neutralization-sensitive) isolates and reported that JRCSF was intrinsically more resistant than HxB2 to anti-HA antibodies. This observation implies, therefore, that some HIV-1 strains (primary, neutralization-resistant strains) have developed mechanisms that limit the accessibility of multiple Env regions, including variable regions, to antibodies developed during infection. Laird and Desrosiers (14) introduced the FLAG epitope into two positions within each of the V1, V2, and V4 loops of SIV239 and SIV316. They reported that the functionality of Env was differentially affected by the precise location of the exogenous tag sequence within the variable loops examined. Importantly, and in contrast to what was reported for the HIV-1 isolates mentioned above, the SIV239 variants containing a V4 FLAG epitope were not neutralized by an anti-FLAG MAb. It appeared, however, that the FLAG epitope was not well exposed on the trimeric Env when introduced into the V4 loop of SIV but was exposed when introduced into the V1 loop of the same virus. Potentially, this means that the V4 loop is differentially exposed in the context of the HIV-1 and SIV Envs.The FLAG epitope (DYKDDDDK) is highly charged. Therefore, it is possible that the effect on Env function and epitope exposure could differ if a different exogenous epitope were inserted instead of FLAG. Here we examined the effect of variable loop tagging on the Env functions and viral neutralization phenotypes of two primary HIV-1 clade B isolates, SF162 (CCR5 tropic) and SF33 (CXCR4 tropic), using two exogenous epitopes (FLAG and hemagglutinin [HA] tags) positioned at multiple locations within the V1, V2, and V4 loops. By placing the same tag in several regions within each loop, we investigated the accessibilities of various parts of the same loop to a given NAb. By using two tags that differ significantly in amino acid composition (FLAG tag, DYKDDDDK; HA tag, YPYDVPDYA), we aimed at distinguishing between the effects of amino acid composition and the positioning of the tag on Env function and overall epitope exposure. Finally, identical evaluations of R5 and X4 Envs may provide information about the relative roles played in neutralization by variable loops in Envs displaying distinct coreceptor usage. We report that both the amino acid sequence and the position of the tag within and among the variable loops greatly affected the functionality of Env. In contrast to previous observations made with other HIV-1 Envs (33) but in agreement with what was reported for the SIV239 Env (14), we observed that tagging of the V4 loops of SF162 and SF33 did not render these isolates susceptible to neutralization by the corresponding anti-tag MAbs.     

Regions required for CD4 binding in the external glycoprotein gp120 of simian immunodeficiency virus.

The external domain of the envelope glycoprotein, gp120, of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) has been expressed as a mature secreted product using recombinant baculoviruses and the expressed protein, which has an observed molecular mass of 110 kDa, was purified by monoclonal antibody (MAb) affinity chromatography. N-terminal sequence analysis showed a signal sequence cleavage identity similar to that of the gp120s of both human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV type 2. The expressed molecule bound to soluble CD4 with an affinity that was approximately 10-fold lower than that of gp120 from HIV-1. A screening of the ability of SIV envelope MAbs to inhibit CD4 binding revealed two groups of inhibitory MAbs. One group is dependent on conformation, while the second group maps to a discrete epitope near the amino terminus. The particular role of the V3 loop region of the molecule in CD4 binding was investigated by the construction of an SIV-HIV hybrid in which the V3 loop of SIV was precisely replaced with the equivalent domain from HIV-1 MN. The hybrid glycoprotein bound HIV-1 V3 loop MAbs and not SIV V3 MAbs but continued to bind conformational SIV MAbs and soluble CD4 as well as the parent molecule.     

Simian immunodeficiency virus engrafted with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific epitopes: replication, neutralization, and survey of HIV-1-positive plasma

To date, only a small number of anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) with relatively broad neutralizing activity have been isolated from infected individuals. Adequate techniques for defining how frequently antibodies of these specificities arise in HIV-infected people have been lacking, although it is generally assumed that such antibodies are rare. In order to create an epitope-specific neutralization assay, we introduced well-characterized HIV-1 epitopes into the heterologous context of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). Specifically, epitope recognition sequences for the 2F5, 4E10, and 447-52D anti-HIV-1 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies were introduced into the corresponding regions of SIVmac239 by site-directed mutagenesis. Variants with 2F5 or 4E10 recognition sequences in gp41 retained replication competence and were used for neutralization assays. The parental SIVmac239 and the neutralization-sensitive SIVmac316 were not neutralized by the 2F5 and 4E10 MAbs, nor were they neutralized significantly by any of the 96 HIV-1-positive human plasma samples that were tested. The SIV239-2F5 and SIV239-4E10 variants were specifically neutralized by the 2F5 and 4E10 MAbs, respectively, at concentrations within the range of what has been reported previously for HIV-1 primary isolates (J. M. Binley et al., J. Virol. 78:13232-13252, 2004). The SIV239-2F5 and SIV239-4E10 epitope-engrafted variants were used as biological screens for the presence of neutralizing activity of these specificities. None of the 92 HIV-1-positive human plasma samples that were tested exhibited significant neutralization of SIV239-2F5. One plasma sample exhibited >90% neutralization of SIV239-4E10, but this activity was not competed by a 4E10 target peptide and was not present in concentrated immunoglobulin G (IgG) or IgA fractions. We thus confirm by direct analysis that neutralizing activities of the 2F5 and 4E10 specificities are either rare among HIV-1-positive individuals or, if present, represent only a very small fraction of the total neutralizing activity in any given plasma sample. We further conclude that the structures of gp41 from SIVmac239 and HIV-1 are sufficiently similar such that epitopes engrafted into SIVmac239 can be readily recognized by the cognate anti-HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies.     

Determinants of Neutralization Resistance in the Envelope Glycoproteins of a Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Passaged In Vivo

In vivo passage of a simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV-89.6) generated a virus, SHIV-89.6P, that exhibited increased resistance to some neutralizing antibodies (G. B. Karlsson et al., J. Exp. Med. 188:1159-1171, 1998). Here we examine the range of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) neutralizing antibodies to which the passaged virus became resistant and identify envelope glycoprotein determinants of antibody resistance. Compared with the envelope glycoproteins derived from the parental SHIV-89.6, the envelope glycoproteins of the passaged virus were resistant to antibodies directed against the gp120 V3 variable loop and the CD4 binding site. By contrast, both viral envelope glycoproteins were equally sensitive to neutralization by two antibodies, 2G12 and 2F5, that recognize poorly immunogenic structures on gp120 and gp41, respectively. Changes in the V2 and V3 variable loops of gp120 were necessary and sufficient for full resistance to the IgG1b12 antibody, which is directed against the CD4 binding site. Changes in the V3 loop specified complete resistance to a V3 loop-directed antibody, while changes in the V1/V2 loops conferred partial resistance to this antibody. The epitopes of the neutralizing antibodies were not disrupted by the resistance-associated changes. These results indicate that in vivo selection occurs for HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins with variable loop conformations that restrict the access of antibodies to immunogenic neutralization epitopes.     

CD4-Induced Conformational Changes in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp120 Glycoprotein: Consequences for Virus Entry and Neutralization

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) entry into target cells involves sequential binding of the gp120 exterior envelope glycoprotein to CD4 and to specific chemokine receptors. Soluble CD4 (sCD4) is thought to mimic membrane-anchored CD4, and its binding alters the conformation of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. Two cross-competing monoclonal antibodies, 17b and CG10, that recognize CD4-inducible gp120 epitopes and that block gp120-chemokine receptor binding were used to investigate the nature and functional significance of gp120 conformational changes initiated by CD4 binding. Envelope glycoproteins derived from both T-cell line-adapted and primary HIV-1 isolates exhibited increased binding of the 17b antibody in the presence of sCD4. CD4-induced exposure of the 17b epitope on the oligomeric envelope glycoprotein complex occurred over a wide range of temperatures and involved movement of the gp120 V1/V2 variable loops. Amino acid changes that reduced the efficiency of 17b epitope exposure following CD4 binding invariably compromised the ability of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins to form syncytia or to support virus entry. Comparison of the CD4 dependence and neutralization efficiencies of the 17b and CG10 antibodies suggested that the epitopes for these antibodies are minimally accessible following attachment of gp120 to cell surface CD4. These results underscore the functional importance of these CD4-induced changes in gp120 conformation and illustrate viral strategies for sequestering chemokine receptor-binding regions from the humoral immune response.     

An Envelope Modification That Renders a Primary, Neutralization-Resistant Clade B Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolate Highly Susceptible to Neutralization by Sera from Other Clades

SF162 is a primary (PR), non-syncytium-inducing, macrophagetropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) clade B isolate which is resistant to antibody-mediated neutralization. Deletion of the first or second hypervariable envelope gp120 region (V1 or V2 loop, respectively) of this virus does not abrogate its ability to replicate in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and primary macrophages, nor does it alter its coreceptor usage profile. The mutant virus with the V1 loop deletion, SF162ΔV1, remains as resistant to antibody-mediated neutralization as the wild-type virus SF162. In contrast, the mutant virus with the V2 loop deletion, SF162ΔV2, exhibits enhanced susceptibility to neutralization by certain monoclonal antibodies whose epitopes are located within the CD4-binding site and conserved regions of gp120. More importantly, SF162ΔV2 is now up to 170-fold more susceptible to neutralization than SF162 by sera collected from patients infected with clade B HIV-1 isolates. In addition, it becomes susceptible to neutralization by sera collected from patients infected with clade A, C, D, E, and F HIV-1 isolates. These findings suggest that the V2, but not the V1, loop of SF162 shields an as yet unidentified region of the HIV envelope rich in neutralization epitopes and that the overall structure of this region appears to be conserved among clade B, C, D, E, and F HIV-1 PR isolates.     

Involvement of the V1/V2 variable loop structure in the exposure of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 epitopes induced by receptor binding.

The binding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) to the cellular receptor CD4 has been suggested to induce conformational changes in the viral envelope glycoproteins that promote virus entry. Conserved, discontinuous epitopes on the HIV-1 gp120 glycoprotein recognized by the 17b, 48d, and A32 antibodies are preferentially exposed upon the binding of soluble CD4 (sCD4). The binding of the 17b and 48d antibodies to the gp120 glycoprotein can also be enhanced by the binding of the A32 antibody. Here we constructed HIV-1 gp120 mutants in which the variable segments of the V1/V2 and V3 structures were deleted, individually or in combination, while the 17b, 48d, and A32 epitopes were retained. The effects of the variable loop deletions on the function of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins and on the exposure of epitopes induced by sCD4 or A32 binding to the monomeric gp120 glycoprotein were examined. The variable-loop-deleted envelope glycoproteins were able to mediate virus entry, albeit at lower efficiencies than those of the wild-type glycoproteins. Thus, the V1/V2 and V3 variable sequences contribute to the efficiency of HIV-1 entry but are not absolutely required for the process. Neither the V1/V2 nor V3 loops were necessary for the increase in exposure of the 17b/48d epitopes induced by binding of the A32 monoclonal antibody. By contrast, induction of the 17b, 48d, and A32 epitopes by sCD4 binding apparently involves a movement of the V1/V2 loops, which in the absence of CD4 partially mask these epitopes on the native gp120 monomer. The results obtained with a mutant glycoprotein containing a deletion of the V1 loop alone indicated that the contribution of the V2 loop to these phenomena was more significant than that of the V1 sequences. These results suggest that the V1/V2 loops, which have been previously implicated in CD4-modulated, postattachment steps in HIV-1 entry, contribute to CD4-induced gp120 conformational changes detected by the 17b, 48d, and A32 antibodies.     

Restraining the conformation of HIV-1 gp120 by removing a flexible loop

The trimeric HIV/SIV envelope glycoprotein, gp160, is cleaved to noncovalently associated fragments, gp120 and gp41. Binding of gp120 to viral receptors leads to large structural rearrangements in both fragments. The unliganded gp120 core has a disordered beta3-beta5 loop, which reconfigures upon CD4 binding into an ordered, extended strand. Molecular modeling suggests that residues in this loop may contact gp41. We show here that deletions in the beta3-beta5 loop of HIV-1 gp120 weaken the binding of CD4 and prevent formation of the epitope for monoclonal antibody (mAb) 17b (which recognizes the coreceptor site). Formation of an encounter complex with CD4 binding and interactions of gp120 with mAbs b12 and 2G12 are not affected by these deletions. Thus, deleting the beta3-beta5 loop blocks the gp120 conformational change and may offer a strategy for design of restrained immunogens. Moreover, mutations in the SIV beta3-beta5 loop lead to greater spontaneous dissociation of gp120 from cell-associated trimers. We suggest that the CD4-induced rearrangement of this loop releases structural constraints on gp41 and thus potentiates its fusion activity.     

Characterization of mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 that have escaped neutralization by a monoclonal antibody to the gp120 V2 loop.

The biologically cloned human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RF isolate is sensitive to neutralization by the murine monoclonal antibody (MAb) G3-4 to a conformationally sensitive epitope in the V2 loop of HIV-1 gp120. To assess how variation in the V2 amino acid sequence affects neutralization by this MAb, we cultured RF in the presence of G3-4 to select neutralization escape mutants. Three such mutants resistant to G3-4 neutralization were generated from three independent experiments. Solubilized gp120 from each of these escape mutants had a reduced affinity for G3-4 and also for two other V2 MAbs that were able to bind the wild-type RF gp120. PCR sequencing of the entire gp120 of the wild-type RF virus and the escape mutants showed that amino acid substitutions had occurred only at two positions, Y177H and L179P, both in V2. Experimental introduction of the Y177H substitution into the RF V2 loop in the context of the NL4-3 molecular clone re-created the G3-4-resistant phenotype. The L179P mutant was not viable. Thus, our findings confirm that the HIV-1 V2 loop contains the conformationally sensitive neutralization epitope recognized by G3-4 and that a single amino acid substitution within this region can result in escape variants that arise from immune selection pressure.     

Variable-loop-deleted variants of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein can be stabilized by an intermolecular disulfide bond between the gp120 and gp41 subunits

We have described an oligomeric gp140 envelope glycoprotein from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 that is stabilized by an intermolecular disulfide bond between gp120 and the gp41 ectodomain, termed SOS gp140 (J. M. Binley, R. W. Sanders, B. Clas, N. Schuelke, A. Master, Y. Guo, F. Kajumo, D. J. Anselma, P. J. Maddon, W. C. Olson, and J. P. Moore, J. Virol. 74:627-643, 2000). In this protein, the protease cleavage site between gp120 and gp41 is fully utilized. Here we report the characterization of gp140 variants that have deletions in the first, second, and/or third variable loop (V1, V2, and V3 loops). The SOS disulfide bond formed efficiently in gp140s containing a single loop deletion or a combination deletion of the V1 and V2 loops. However, deletion of all three variable loops prevented formation of the SOS disulfide bond. Some variable-loop-deleted gp140s were not fully processed to their gp120 and gp41 constituents even when the furin protease was cotransfected. The exposure of the gp120-gp41 cleavage site is probably affected in these proteins, even though the disabling change is in a region of gp120 distal from the cleavage site. Antigenic characterization of the variable-loop-deleted SOS gp140 proteins revealed that deletion of the variable loops uncovers cryptic, conserved neutralization epitopes near the coreceptor-binding site on gp120. These modified, disulfide-stabilized glycoproteins might be useful as immunogens.