Impact of the mass-reductive therapy with orlistat on 25-(OH)-D3 and PTH concentration in sera of obese, menopausal women

Epidemiological studies suggest a protective influence of obesity against postmenopausal bone loss. Lower risk of osteoporotic fractures was described in obese patients. However there were only a few studies which examined the effect of weight reduction on bone metabolism and results of these studies are controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of weight reduction program using Orlistat on bone metabolism in perimenopausal women. Twenty obese women with simple obesity and without concomitant diseases (BMI 37.1 +/- 3.0 kg/m2, mean age 49.8 +/- 4.6 yrs) were enrolled into this study. The control group consisted of 20 healthy women (mean age 53.5 +/- 5.4 yrs, BMI 24.1 +/- 2.2 kg/m2). All patients have participated in a 3-month weight reduction therapy that consisted of: a 1000-1200 kcal/ day balanced diet (daily calcium consumption about 500mg), Orlistat 3 x 120mg a day and regular physical exercises. Before the weight reduction therapy and after 10% reduction of body weight, serum concentrations of PTH, 25-(OH)-D3, total calcium and phosphorus, total cholesterol were assessed. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA method) of lumbar spine and femoral neck, measuring BMD was performed once, after a 3-month weight reduction therapy using Lunar DPXL. All these measurements were performed only once in control subjects. After a 3-month weight reduction program in patients treated with Orlistat the mean weight loss was 11.6 +/- 5.1 kg which is 12.1 +/- 4.78 %. BMI decreased from 37.1 +/- 3.0 kg/m2 at baseline to 32.6 +/- 2.7 kg/m2 post-treatment. The body weight reduction resulted in significant decrease of body fat and total cholesterol concentration. In obese subjects serum concentration of 25-(OH)-D3 was significantly lower and serum concentration of PTH was significantly higher in comparison to healthy controls, both before and after weight reduction therapy. Serum concentration of PTH, 25-(OH)-D3, total calcium and phosphorus did not change significantly after therapy with Orlistat. Conclusion: 3-month weight reduction program using Orlistat did not influence significantly bone metabolism.     

Effect of orlistat on the total ghrelin and leptin levels in obese patients

Obesity, characterized by hyperleptinemia and hypoghrelinemia, has become a major health problem all over the world and is associated with an increased risk of complications including insulin resistance, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis. The use of the pancreatic lipase inhibitor Orlistat can help seriously overweight people to achieve and maintain weight loss. The aim of our study was to compare the serum leptin and ghrelin levels in obese subjects who take orlistat with those receiving only dietary treatment. Twenty-one obese patients and 10 control subjects participated. The obese patients were divided into two groups; one group (n=11) took orlistat (120 mg, 3 times daily) and received dietary treatment and the other (n=10) only received the dietary treatment. The study lasted twelve weeks. The concentrations of serum ghrelin, leptin, insulin and C-peptide, and routine biochemical parameters, were measured in both groups. The serum ghrelin level was higher in control (183±62 fmol/ml) than obese (59±30 fmol/ml) subjects while the plasma leptin level was lower in control (8.7±12 μg/L) than obese (36.7±19 μg/L) subjects (all p<0.001). BMI and the total blood cholesterol, LDL and triglyceride levels fell significantly after both orlistat and dietary treatment in the obese subjects (all p<0.01), and the plasma ghrelin level rose (p<0.01). The leptin level demonstrated the opposite trend in both groups but only the patients taking orlistat showed a significant change (p<0.05).Taken together, these results show that orlistat has no effect on body weight in obese subjects additional to that conferred by a non-pharmacological life-style intervention. We therefore conclude that weight lost rather than type of treatment might be more valuable in obesity.     

Orlistat Inhibits Dietary Cholesterol Absorption

Objective: Orlistat decreases the absorption of dietary triglycerides by inhibiting intestinal lipases. Orlistat therapy is associated with a greater decline in plasma low‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol concentrations than that expected from weight loss alone. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of orlistat treatment on dietary cholesterol absorption as a possible mechanism for the independent effect of orlistat on plasma cholesterol concentration. Research Methods and Procedures: Cholesterol absorption from a standardized meal, containing 72 mg of cholesterol, was determined in 18 subjects with class II abdominal obesity (BMI, 35.0 to 39.9 kg/m²) by simultaneous administration of intravenous ([²H₆] cholesterol) and oral ([²H₅] cholesterol) cholesterol tracers. In protocol 1 (n = 9), cholesterol absorption was determined on two different occasions, 10 to 20 days apart, to assess the reproducibility of the tracer method. In protocol 2 (n = 9), cholesterol absorption was determined with and without orlistat therapy in a prospective, randomized, crossover design to assess the effect of orlistat on cholesterol absorption. Results: In protocol 1, cholesterol absorption from the test meal was the same on both occasions (53 ± 5% and 51 ± 5%). In protocol 2, orlistat treatment caused a 25% reduction in cholesterol absorption, from 59 ± 6% to 44 ± 5% (p < 0.01). Discussion: These data demonstrate that orlistat inhibits dietary cholesterol absorption, which may have beneficial effects on lipoprotein metabolism in obese subjects that are independent of weight loss itself.     

Weight Loss,Weight Maintenance,and Improved Cardiovascular Risk Factors after 2 Years Treatment with Orlistat for Obesity

Objective: To determine the effect of orlistat, a new lipase inhibitor, on long‐term weight loss, to determine the extent to which orlistat treatment minimizes weight regain in a second year of treatment, and to assess the effects of orlistat on obesity‐related risk factors. Research Methods and Procedures: This was a 2‐year, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Obese patients (body mass index 28 to 43 kg/m²) were randomized to placebo or orlistat (60 or 120 mg) three times a day, combined with a hypocaloric diet during the first year and a weight maintenance diet in the second year of treatment to prevent weight regain. Changes in body weight, lipid profile, glycemic control, blood pressure, quality of life, safety, and tolerability were measured. Results: Orlistat‐treated patients lost significantly more weight (p < 0.001) than placebo‐treated patients after Year 1 (6.6%, 8.6%, and 9.7% for the placebo, and orlistat 60 mg and 120 mg groups, respectively). During the second year, orlistat therapy produced less weight regain than placebo (p = 0.005 for orlistat 60 mg; p < 0.001 for orlistat 120 mg). Several obesity‐related risk factors improved significantly more with orlistat treatment than with placebo. Orlistat was generally well tolerated and only 6% of orlistat‐treated patients withdrew because of adverse events. Orlistat leads to predictable gastrointestinal effects related to its mode of action, which were generally mild, transient, and self‐limiting and usually occurred early during treatment. Discussion: Orlistat administered for 2 years promotes weight loss and minimizes weight regain. Additionally, orlistat therapy improves lipid profile, blood pressure, and quality of life.     

The effect of weight loss on serum concentration of interleukine-6 (IL-6) and insulin resistance

INTRODUCTION: Interleukine-6 (IL-6) is one of the cytokines, excreting by adipocytes, which increases in obesity. These cytokines participate in very complicated mechanisms of developing insulin resistance that accompany obesity. The aim of the study was to: 1) evaluate the influence of weight loss on insulin resistance and serum concentration of IL-6, 2) evaluate the hypothetical association between serum concentration of IL-6 and the improvement of insulin sensitivity in obese women after weight loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 27 obese women (age 40.3 +/- 11.1 year; BMI 37.4 +/- 5.2 kg/m(2)) with insulin resistance diagnosed using HOMA index, without concomitant diseases and without any medication. All the patients participated in complex weight reduction treatment (diet, physical activity and psychotherapy). Before and after weight reduction therapy weight and height were measured, body composition was determined using bioimpedance analysis. Serum concentration of glucose was determined by enzymatic procedure, serum concentration of insulin was measured by radioimmunoassay, serum concentration of IL-6 was measured by ELISA. HOMA index was calculated with formula. RESULTS: The mean weight loss after 3-month was 9.2 +/- 4.5 kg (approximately 10% of initial weight). After weight reduction significant decreases in HOMA index, insulin and IL-6 concentrations was observed. However, no correlations between changes in insulin concentrations, HOMA index and decrease of IL-6 concentration were showed. We observed significant correlations between DeltaHOMA and DeltaBMI (r = 0.48; p = 0.012) and Delta percentage fat mass (r = 0.39; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A moderate weight loss improves insulin sensitivity and decreases serum concentrations of IL-6. However improvement of insulin sensitivity is the effect of fat mass reduction and does not change serum concentration of IL-6.     

Serum Leptin Concentrations and Weight Gain in Postobese,Postmenopausal Women

Objective : This study was designed to determine if serum leptin concentrations (adjusted for fat mass) after weight loss on a low-calorie diet predict subsequent weight gain. Research Methods and Procedures : Body composition and serum leptin concentrations were determined on 14 moderately obese, postmenopausal, nondiabetic women with a familial predisposition to obesity. Assessments were obtained under tightly controlled metabolic ward conditions of macronutrient intake and weight maintenance both before (obese state) and after a mean weight loss of 12.0 kg to normal body weight (postobese state). Four years later, without intervention, body weight and body composition were reassessed. Results : Weight loss resulted in significant decreases in fat mass (29.7 ± 5.4 vs. 20.3 ± 4.7; kg), body mass index (27.7 ± 1.6 vs. 23.0 ± 1.5; kg/m2), percent body fat (40.7 ± 4.3 vs. 33.1 ± 5.0), and serum leptin concentrations (31.8 ± 16.0 vs. 11.5 ± 5.4; ng/mL). Serum leptin concentrations were positively correlated (p<<0.05) with fat mass in both the obese and postobese states (r = 0.67 and r = 0.56, respectively). However, residual serum leptin concentrations (adjusted for fat mass) in the obese and postobese states were not related to changes in body weight (p<= 0.61 and 0.52), fat mass (p = 0.72 and 0.42), body mass index (p = 0.59 and 0.33), or percent body fat (p = 0.84 and 0.46) over the follow-up period. Discussion : These finding do not support the hypothesis that relatively low concentrations of leptin predict weight regain after weight loss. However, because the number of subjects in this study was limited, further studies are warranted.     

Effect of Orlistat in Obese Patients with Binge Eating Disorder

Objective: Binge eating disorder represents a significant public health problem, with up to 50% of weight loss program participants displaying this disorder. In previous studies with orlistat, patients with binge eating disorder were excluded. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of orlistat in obese patients with binge eating disorder. Research Methods and Procedures: Eighty‐nine patients with clinically diagnosed binge eating disorder and a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² were randomized in double‐blind fashion to 24 weeks of treatment with 120 mg of orlistat or placebo three times daily, in combination with a mildly reduced‐calorie diet. Results: After 24 weeks, the mean weight loss from baseline for orlistat‐treated patients was significantly greater than for patients receiving placebo (?7.4% vs. ?2.3%; p = 0.0001) (intent‐to‐treat analysis). The overall Eating Disorder Inventory 2 score at week 24 was significantly lower in patients treated with orlistat than in those in the placebo group (p = 0.011) Discussion: Orlistat may be considered as part of the management for patients with obesity and binge eating disorder.     

Lipase Inhibition and Hormonal Status,Body Composition and Gastrointestinal Processing of a Liquid High-Fat Mixed Meal in Moderately Obese Subjects

DRENT, MADELEINE L, CORRIE POPP-SNIJDERS, HERMAN J ADER, JAN BMJ JANSEN AND EDUARD A VAN DER VEEN. Lipase inhibition and hormonal status, body composition and gastrointestinal processing of a liquid high-fat mixed meal in moderately obese subjects. Obes Res. The effect of Orlistat, a lipase inhibitor used in the treatment of obesity was studied on gastrointestinal transit time, on body composition and on hormones known to be influenced by the degree of hydrolysis of nutritional triglycerides or by reduced nutrient intake and absorption. After a placebo run-in period 14 patients were randomized to a 12-week treatment period on Orlistat 360 mg per day (mean body weight 93.1 ± 9.8 kg) or placebo (mean body weight 90.7 ± 10.5 kg). At randomization and after 12 weeks body weight, body composition, thyroid hormones, catecholamines, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein 3 were measured. During 4 hours after consumption of a liquid fat-rich mixed meal containing study medication, 15 g lactulose and 25 g xylose, blood levels of glucose, insulin, c-peptide, glucagon, triglycerides, free fatty acids, cholecys-tokinin, pancreatic polypeptide and xylose and expiration air levels of hydrogen were measured. Weight loss was 4.2 ± 3.5 kg in the Orlistat group versus 3.0 ± 1.9 kg in the placebo group. Fat mass decreased to an equal degree, whereas lean body mass remained stable. No differences were found for thyroid hormones, catecholamines, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels. By comparing the areas under the curve (AUC) and the peak levels at randomization (acute effects) of insulin and c-peptide a tendency was found to be increased in the Orlistat group, whereas those of xylose were increased significantly, suggesting faster gastric empyting after Orlistat. No differences were found in the other parameters. By comparing the changes in responses (longer term effects) no significant differences were found. In conclusion, the presence in the gut of undigested and unabsorbed fat does not seem to have a relevant influence on hormonal status and body composition in a small group of moderately obese patients.     

Effects of different weight loss protocols on serum leptin levels in obese females

We investigated the effects of different weight loss protocols on leptin levels in obese females with the aim of addressing the leptin resistance which has been found to be an aggravating factor in obesity. Twenty-four obese females enrolled to one of three 12-week weight loss protocols: orlistat-induced weight loss (OWL, n=8), exercise-induced weight loss (EWL, n=8) and orlistat plus exercise-induced weight loss (OEWL, n=8). Serum leptin levels were measured in duplicate by radioimmunoassay. There were significant reductions (P<0.01) in body weight and fat mass after the 12 week period in all groups: -11.4+/-0.5 kg and -9.8+/-0.5 kg (OEWL), -8.3+/-0.8 kg and -5.7+/-0.9 kg (OWL), -8.9+/-1.2 kg and -7.4+/-1.2 kg (EWL), respectively. Serum leptin levels were also decreased markedly in all groups: -59.2 % (OEWL1), -37.8 % (OWL) and -48.6 % (EWL) (P<0.01 all). In addition, there were marked decreases in leptin levels for each kilogram of fat mass after the 12 week period: -48.2+/-7.2 % (OEWL), -27.8+/-4.8 % (OWL) and -39.3+/-4.3 % (EWL) (P<0.01 all). Decreases in serum leptin levels expressed per kilogram of fat mass were significantly higher in the OEWL group compared to the OWL group (P=0.03). Consequently, an exercise training program in adjunct to pharmacotherapy provides higher weight reduction and fat mass loss in obesity treatment. It also seems to have further beneficial effects on leptin resistance, as indicated by decreases in leptin levels expressed per kilogram of fat mass.     

Biochemical and histological impact of Vernonia amygdalina supplemented diet in obese rats

This study was carried out to evaluate the anti-obesity effect of Vernonia amygdalina Del. (VA) supplemented diet. VA leaf powder was fed at 5% and 15% to diet-induced obese rats for 4 weeks and its effect compared with orlistat (5.14 mg/kg p.o.), an anti-obesity drug. Food intake, body and organ weights, total body fat, some lipid components and amino transaminase activities in serum, hepatocytes and brain; as well as serum glucose, were measured during or at end of the study. Result showed respective decrease of 12.78% and 38.51% in body weight gain, of VA fed rats against 17.45% of orlistat at end of study (P < 0.05); but with no effect on food intake. Total body fat was lowered by 28.04% and 30.02% vs. obese control rats (CDC) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, serum triacylglycerol (TG), serum and brain total cholesterol (TCHOL), were down regulated at 15% VA supplementation (P < 0.05). Serum glucose which increased in obese rats by 46.26% (P < 0.05) vs. NC, indicating intolerance, was restored by VA (38.75% and 34.65%) and orlistat (31.80%) vs. CDC (P < 0.05). VA diet also exerted hepato-protection, via lowering serum alanine amino transaminase (ALT) (41.35% and 27.13%) and aspartate amino transaminase (AST) (17.09% and 43.21%) activities (P < 0.05). Orlistat had no effect on these enzymes. Histology of adipose tissue corroborated the changes on total body fat. We concluded that, diet supplemented with VA can attenuate dietary obesity as well as ameliorates the potential risks of hepato-toxicity and glucose intolerance associated with obesity.     

Improvements in cardiovascular risk profile with large-volume liposuction: a pilot study

In this study, the authors investigated the physiologic effects of the altered body composition that results from surgical removal of large amounts of subcutaneous adipose tissue. Fourteen women with body mass indexes of greater than > 27 kg/m2 underwent measurements of fasting plasma insulin, triglycerides, cholesterol, body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), resting energy expenditure, and blood pressure before and after undergoing large-volume ultrasound-assisted liposuction.There were no significant intraoperative complications. Body weight had decreased by 5.1 kg (p < 0.0001) by 6 weeks after liposuction, with an additional 1.3-kg weight loss (p < 0.05) observed between 6 weeks and 4 months after surgery, for a total weight loss of 6.5 kg (p < 0.00006). Body mass index decreased from (mean +/- SEM) 28.8 +/- 2.3 to 26.8 +/- 1.5 kg/m2 (p < 0.0001). This change in body weight was primarily the result of decreases in body fat mass: as assessed by DXA, lean body mass did not change (43.8 +/- 3.1 kg to 43.4 +/- 3.6 kg, p = 0.80), whereas DXA total body fat mass decreased from 35.7 +/- 6.3 to 30.1 +/- 6.5 kg (p < 0.0001). There were significant decreases in fasting plasma insulin levels (14.9 +/- 6.5 mIU/ml before liposuction versus 7.2 +/- 3.2 mIU/ml 4 months after liposuction, p < 0.007), and systolic blood pressure (132.1 +/- 7.2 versus 120.5 +/- 7.8 mmHg, p < 0.0002). Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, plasma triglycerides, and resting energy expenditure values were not significantly altered after liposuction.In conclusion, over a 4-month period, large-volume liposuction decreased weight, body fat mass, systolic blood pressure, and fasting insulin levels without detrimental effects on lean body mass, bone mass, resting energy expenditure, or lipid profiles. Should these improvements be maintained over time, liposuction may prove to be a valuable tool for reducing the comorbid conditions associated with obesity.     

Orlistat 60 mg reduces visceral adipose tissue: a 24-week randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial

It is well established that abdominal obesity or upper body fat distribution is associated with increased risk of metabolic and cardiovascular disease. The purpose of the present study was to determine if a 24 week weight loss program with orlistat 60 mg in overweight subjects would produce a greater change in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) as measured by computed tomography (CT) scan, compared to placebo. The effects of orlistat 60 mg on changes in total fat mass (EchoMRI‐AH and BIA), ectopic fat (CT) and glycemic variables were assessed. One‐hundred thirty‐one subjects were randomized into a multicenter, double‐blind placebo controlled study in which 123 subjects received at least one post baseline efficacy measurement (intent‐to‐treat population). Both orlistat‐and placebo‐treated subjects significantly decreased their VAT at 24 weeks with a significantly greater loss of VAT by orlistat treated subjects (?15.7% vs. ?9.4%, P < 0.05). In addition, orlistat‐treated subjects had significantly greater weight loss (?5.93 kg vs. ?3.94 kg, P < 0.05), total fat mass loss (?4.65 kg vs. ?3.01 kg, P < 0.05) and trended to a greater loss of intermuscular adipose tissue and content of liver fat compared with placebo‐treated subjects. This is the first study to demonstrate that orlistat 60 mg significantly reduces VAT in addition to total body fat compared to placebo treated subjects after a 24 week weight loss program. These results suggest that orlistat 60 mg may be an effective weight loss tool to reduce metabolic risk factors associated with abdominal obesity.     

Effect of weight loss on VLDL-triglyceride and apoB-100 kinetics in women with abdominal obesity

The effects of obesity and weight loss on lipoprotein kinetics were evaluated in six lean women [body mass index (BMI): 21 +/- 1 kg/m(2)] and seven women with abdominal obesity (BMI: 36 +/- 1 kg/m(2)). Stable isotope tracer techniques, in conjunction with compartmental modeling, were used to determine VLDL-triglyceride (TG) and apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100) secretion rates in lean women and in obese women before and after 10% weight loss. VLDL-TG and VLDL-apoB-100 secretion rates were similar in lean and obese women. Weight loss decreased the rate of VLDL-TG secretion by approximately 40% (from 0.41 +/- 0.05 to 0.23 +/- 0.03 micromol x kg fat-free mass(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.05). The relative decline in VLDL-TG produced from nonsystemic fatty acids, derived from intraperitoneal and intrahepatic TG, was greater (61 +/- 7%) than the decline in VLDL-TG produced from systemic fatty acids, predominantly derived from subcutaneous TG (25 +/- 8%; P < 0.05). Weight loss did not affect VLDL-apoB-100 secretion rate. We conclude that weight loss decreases the rate of VLDL-TG secretion in women with abdominal obesity, primarily by decreasing the availability of nonsystemic fatty acids. There is a dissociation in the effect of weight loss on VLDL-TG and apoB-100 metabolic pathways that may affect VLDL particle size.     

Use of lifestyle changes treatment plans and drug therapy in controlling cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors

Intervention in weight management should begin before the onset of the metabolic syndrome. Therapeutic lifestyle changes (e.g., diet and physical activity) comprise the cornerstone of care for overweight and obese patients. Behavior modification approaches are useful in facilitating adherence to specific dietary regimens. Pharmacotherapy is an option for patients with a BMI >30 kg/m(2) or for those with a BMI of 27 to 30 kg/m(2) and two or more risk factors, who have failed on diet and exercise alone. To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved three weight loss agents: sibutramine, orlistat, and phentermine.     

Body Weight Modulates Cholesterol Metabolism in Non‐Insulin Dependent Type 2 Diabetics

Objective: Cholesterol metabolism was studied in 64 subjects with type 2 diabetes who had body weight ranging from normal to obese, to find out whether weight interferes with cholesterol metabolism in diabetes. Research Methods and Procedures: Cholesterol absorption was measured with peroral isotopes and by assaying serum plant sterol and cholestanol to cholesterol ratios, cholesterol synthesis with sterol balance, and measuring serum cholesterol precursor ratios. Results: The study population was divided into normal‐weight (body mass index, 24.1 ± 0.4 kg/m²; mean ± SEM; n = 20) and obese (31.0 ± 0.5 kg/m²; n = 44) groups. Despite similar serum cholesterol and blood glucose values, fecal neutral sterol excretion, cholesterol and bile acid synthesis, cholesterol turnover (1649 ± 78 vs. 1077 ± 52 mg/d; p < 0.001), and serum cholesterol precursors were higher, and cholesterol absorption % (32 ± 1 vs. 40 ± 2%; p < 0.05), serum cholestanol, and plant sterols were lower in the obese vs. the non‐obese groups. Serum sex hormone‐binding globulin was positively associated with variables of cholesterol absorption, whereas blood glucose, serum insulin, and body mass index were associated with variables of cholesterol synthesis. In multiple stepwise regression analysis, cholesterol absorption percentage (R² = 24%) and body mass index (R² = 15%) were the only variables explaining the variability of cholesterol synthesis. Discussion: Body weight, through its entire range, regulates cholesterol metabolism in type 2 diabetes such that with increasing insulin resistance, cholesterol absorption is lowered and cholesterol synthesis increased.     

Effects of Sibutramine Plus Orlistat in Obese Women Following 1 Year of Treatment by Sibutramine Alone: A Placebo‐Controlled Trial

Objective: This study assessed whether adding orlistat to sibutramine would induce further weight loss in patients who previously had lost weight while taking sibutramine alone. Research Methods and Procedures: Patients were 34 women with a mean age of 44.1 ± 10.4 years, weight of 89.4 ± 13.8 kg, and body mass index (BMI) of 33.9 ± 4.9 kg/m² who had lost an average of 11.6 ± 9.2% of initial weight during the prior 1 year of treatment by sibutramine combined with lifestyle modification. Patients were randomly assigned, in double‐blind fashion, to sibutramine plus orlistat or sibutramine plus placebo. In addition to medication, participants were provided five brief lifestyle modification visits during the 16‐week continuation trial. Results: Mean body weight did not change significantly in either treatment condition during the 16 weeks. The addition of orlistat to sibutramine did not induce further weight loss as compared with treatment by sibutramine alone (mean changes = +0.1 ± 4.1 kg vs. +0.5 ± 2.1 kg, respectively). Discussion: These results must be interpreted with caution because of the study's small sample size. The findings, however, suggest that the combination of sibutramine and orlistat is unlikely to have additive effects that will yield mean losses ≥15% of initial weight, as desired by many obese individuals.     

Independent effects of weight change and attained body weight on prevalence of arterial hypertension in obese and non-obese men.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the relations among prevalence of arterial hypertension, history of weight change, and current body weight in the range from normal weight to severe obesity. DESIGN--Retrospective analysis of medical records of men registered with Danish military authorities from 1943 to 1977 and followed up four to 40 years later. SETTING--Draft board of Copenhagen and surrounding counties and the rest of Sjaelland and surrounding islands. SUBJECTS--964 Men who were severely obese (body mass index greater than or equal to kg/m2 at the first examination) and 1134 random controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Blood pressure and weight. RESULTS--Hypertension was more prevalent in subjects with an unchanged body mass index as that index increased over the range studied. At any body mass index hypertension was more prevalent in subjects who had increased to this index and less common in those who had decreased to it than in those who had stayed the same weight since the first examination. Hypertension among controls was most common in those subjects who had become obese during adulthood. CONCLUSIONS--Changes in body weight have a great influence on arterial hypertension independent of the effect of attained weight, particularly in obese subjects.     

Changes in body composition with weight loss: obese subjects randomized to surgical and medical programs

Objective: To assess changes in body composition with weight loss in obese subjects randomized to a laparoscopic adjustable gastric band surgical program or a medical program using a very‐low‐energy diet and orlistat. Research Methods and Procedures: Using body composition measurements by DXA, neutron activation for total body nitrogen, and whole body γ counting for total body potassium, we studied changes in fat mass, fat distribution, fat‐free mass, total bone mineral content, total body protein, and body cell mass at 6 (n = 61 paired) and 24 months (n = 53 paired) after randomization. Results: At 24 months, the surgical group had lost significantly more weight (surgical, 20.3 ± 6.5 kg; medical, 5.9 ± 8.0 kg). There was favorable fat‐free mass to fat mass loss ratios for both groups (surgical, 1:5.5; medical, 1:5.9). Changes in total body nitrogen or potassium were favorable in each group. A small reduction in mean bone mineral content occurred throughout the study but was not associated with extent of weight loss or treatment group. At 6 months, weight loss for both groups was similar (surgical, 14.1 ± 4.5 kg; medical, 13.3 ± 7.3 kg). The medical program subjects lost less fat‐free mass and skeletal muscle and had increased total body protein. The proportion of body fat to limb fat remained remarkably constant throughout the study. Discussion: Weight loss programs used in this study induced fat loss without significant deleterious effects on the components of fat‐free mass.     

Muscle fiber type is associated with obesity and weight loss

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that muscle fiber type is related to obesity. Fiber type was compared 1) in lean and obese women, 2) in Caucasian (C) and African-American (AA) women, and 3) in obese individuals who lost weight after gastric bypass surgery. When lean (body mass index 24.0 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2), n = 28) and obese (34.8 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2), n = 25) women were compared, there were significant (P < 0.05) differences in muscle fiber type. The obese women possessed fewer type I (41.5 +/- 1.8 vs. 54.6 +/- 1.8%) and more type IIb (25.1 +/- 1.5 vs. 14.4 +/- 1.5%) fibers than the lean women. When ethnicity was accounted for, the percentage of type IIb fibers in obese AA was significantly higher than in obese C (31.0 +/- 2.4% vs. 19.2 +/- 1.9%); fewer type I fibers were also found in obese AA (34.5 +/- 2.8% vs. 48.6 +/- 2.2%). These data are consistent with the higher incidence of obesity and greater weight gain reported in AA women. With weight loss intervention, there was a positive relationship (r = 0.72, P < 0.005) between the percentage of excess weight loss and the percentage of type I fibers in morbidly obese patients. These findings indicate that there is a relationship between muscle fiber type and obesity.     

Relationship of Co-Morbidities of Obesity to Weight Loss and Four-Year Weight Maintenance/Rebound

This study examined the effect of weight loss (separate from energy restriction) and weight maintenance/rebound over time on blood pressure, serum lipids, and body composition in 24 obese (mean 137% ideal body weight (IEW)) females with mild to moderate hypertension. Weight loss was induced under tightly controlled General Clinical Research Center conditions until each subject had lost at least 10 kg (mean 13 kg) and attained normal body weight (<120% IBW). After 4 years subjects returned for repeat evaluation. Weight changes were compared with 24 pair-matched normal weight controls who were also followed for 4 years. With weight loss, significant improvements were seen in standing mean arterial pressure (MAP), serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides. Subjects regained 11 kg (87% of the weight lost) over the 4 year follow-up period while control subjects gained only 2 kg. Subjects who chose self-selected exercise gained less weight than nonexercisers (6 kg vs. 13 kg, P<0.05). With weight regain there were significant increases in standing and supine MAP, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. The amount of weight regained was significantly correlated with standing MAP (r=0.73), triglycerides (r=0.43), and HDL cholesterol (r=-0.47). The percentage fat of the weight regained was no greater than that of the weight previously lost. Weight loss, distinct from energy restriction, was associated with improvements in blood pressure and serum lipid levels. The ability to sustain these improvements in the co-morbidities of obesity was directly related to the persistence and magnitude of weight loss maintenance.