中国湖南人群GSTM1和GSTT1基因多态性与肺癌易感性关系的研究

应用病例-对照分析研究(对照组205例,肺癌病例组104例),抽提静脉血基因组DNA,采用PCR及多重PCR方法,检测谷胱甘肽转移酶GSTM1和GSTT1单独及联合缺失基因型的遗传多态性在中国湖南人群中肺癌患者和正常人群体中的分布,探讨这些多态性基因型与肺癌易感性的关系.结果显示GSTM1-/-基因型在湖南地区居民肺癌群体和正常对照人群中的频率分别为62.5%和46.3%(P<0.05);肺癌患者组GSTT1-/-基因型的频率(66.3%)显著高于正常对照组(42.4%)(P<0.05).GSTM1-/-和GSTT1-/-联合基因型在肺癌组和正常对照组中的频率分别为41.3%和22.4%(P<0.05).SPSS11.5软件统计学分析表明,这些基因型在肺癌患者组和正常对照组人群中的发生频率具有显著性差异.由此可知GSTM1基因缺失和GSTT1基因缺失分别与肺癌的易感性相关;GSTM1和GSTT1基因联合缺失与肺癌的发生和发展呈现显著正相关.     

支气管哮喘遗传因子研究

研究谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶 （glutathione S-transferase, GST）M1和T1基因多态性与支气管哮喘（asthma bronchial）的关系。采取聚合酶链反应对60名支气管哮喘患者和60名正常对照进行了GSTM1和GSTT1基因非缺失（+）和缺失（0）等位基因分布频率研究。结果表明,与对照组相比,支气管哮喘患者GSTM1基因缺失的纯合子（0/0）频率（81.2%）显著升高（χ2=32.46,P<0.001;wχ2=28.75,P<0.001）。对于GSTT1也得到类似资料。而支气管哮喘患者GSTT1基因缺失等位基因（0/0）频率（71.7%）比对照组（11.7%）显著升高（χ2=26.72,P<0.001;wχ2=35.75,P<0.001）。表明GSTM1、GSTT1缺失等位基因纯合性在哮喘患者中最有特征性的。GSTM1 0/0、GSTT1 0/0结合的频率患者组为61.7%,对照组仅为1.7%（χ2=27.3,P<0.001）。提示GSTM1和GSTT1基因多态性与哮喘有显著性关联,两个基因的突变可以被视为发生支气管哮喘遗传风险因子。     

应用寡核苷酸芯片并行检测CYP1A1和 GSTM1基因多态性

利用寡核苷酸芯片检测方法分析CYP1A1单核苷酸多态性 (SNP)和GSTM1缺失与否 ,实验结果证明了寡核苷酸芯片技术可并行、准确、高效地检测基因的单核苷酸多态性和其他类型的基因多态型 ,可为疾病遗传易感性及单体型的研究提供强有力的研究工具。采用该寡核苷酸芯片 ,检测了 84份正常人的血液DNA样本 ,其中GSTM1基因缺失率达到 4 7 6 % ,接近报道数值。统计分析发现 ,CYP1A1m1 m2的 3种基因型组合TT AG、TT GG和TC GG的发生频率都为 0 ,而根据实验得到的m1和m2各自基因型数据计算 ,它们的发生频率应是11 4 %、2 6 %和 3 1% ,所以推测在所检测的样本中没有T(m1位点 )和G(m2位点 )的连锁组合 ,即m1和m2位点的组合只有 3种单体型 :T A、C A和C G ,其发生频率分别是 6 9 6 %、7 7%和 2 2 6 %。     

拉米夫定联合胸腺肽A1 治疗慢性乙型肝炎的疗效观察

目的:探讨拉米夫定(LAM)联合胸腺肽α1(Tα1)治疗慢性乙型肝炎的长期疗效和安全性。方法:72例慢性乙肝患者(HBV-DNA和HBeAg均阳性),按1:1随机分配进入联合治疗组(LAM+Tα1组)和单用拉米夫定组(LAM组)。结果:治疗1年时LAM+Tα1组HBeAg血清转换率(44.4%,16/36例)明显高于LAM组(5.6%,2/36例),P<0.01。停药1年后,持续的HBeAg血清转换率分别为36.1%(13/36例)和8.3%(3/36例),P<0.01。治疗过程中及停药后,两组HBV-DNA水平均明显下降,但两组的HBV-DNA转阴率相仿。治疗后1年ALT复常率联合治疗组与拉米夫定组相似,分别为75%(27/36例)和66.7%(24/36例)、随访1年时ALT复常率联合治疗组明显高于拉米夫定组,分别为58.3%(21/36例)和16.7%(6/36例)。在治疗过程中,未发现严重的不良反应。结论:LAM联合Tα1治疗慢性乙肝,不良反应少,疗效优于单一LAM用药组。     

乳腺癌SULT1A1、ICAM5基因单核苷酸多态性的研究

目的:探讨硫酸基转移酶(sulfotransferase,SULT)lA1、细胞间粘附分子(ICAM5)基因多态性与女性乳腺癌易感性的关系.方法:采外周血DNA后用等位基因特异性扩增法(allele specific amplification,ASA)检测青岛市200例正常对照者和160例乳腺癌患者的SULTIA1、ICAM5基因多态性分布,并进行统计学分析.结果:(1)SULTlA1 Arg/Arg、Arg/His、His/His三种基因型分布在对照组和病例组之间的差异无显著意义(P=0.103);病例组、对照组His等位基因频率分别为19.5%和9.2%(P=0.039),此差别有统计学意义;在淋巴结转移方面SULTIA1基因三种基因型在阴、阳性组间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.038).(2)ICAM5基因各基因型及等位基因分布频率在病例组和对照组间的差异无显著意义(P=0.245,P=0.294);从临床病例分型方面进一步分析,基因型GG与携带变异基因A的GA及AA基因型相比差异均无统计意义.结论:SULTlA1 His等位基因与汉族女性乳腺癌的发生可能相关.     

GSTT1 、GSTM1 基因多态性与重度慢性牙周炎 易感性关系的研究

目的：研究GSTTI＋／0和GSTM1＋／0基因型及其联合基因型与重度慢性牙周（chronic pefiodontitis,cp）易感性的关系。方法：用聚合酶链反应检测50例重度慢性牙周炎患者和51例正常对照者的GSIT1＋／0、GSTM1＋／0的基因型。结果：GSTM1（0／0）和GSTT1（0／0）基因型及GSTMI（0／0）与GSTT1（0／0）联合基因型对重度慢性牙周炎相对危险度（OR）分别为9．56（95％CI．3．88—23．59）,8．68（95％CI,3．50—21．51）,36．83（95％CI,10．42—130．13）。结论：在内蒙古汉族人群中,基因型GSTT1（0／0）和GSTM1（0／0）增加了个体对重度慢性牙周炎易感性,且上述两种基因型间存在协同作用。     

TGF-β1-509(C/T)基因多态性与子宫内膜异位症相关性的研究

目的:研究转化生长因子(TGF-β1)-509(C/T)基因多态性与子宫内膜异位症易感性的关系。方法:采用PCR-RFLP法和PCR产物直接测序法,检测80例子宫内膜异位症和80例正常对照组TGF-β1-509(C/T)基因型及等位基因分布。结果:子宫内膜异位症组TGF-β1-509CC、CT、TT基因型频率分别为20%、35%、45%,C和T等位基因频率分别为37.5%和62.5%;对照组中TGF-β1-509CC、CT、TT基因型频率分别为30%、32.5%、37.5%,C和T等位基因频率分别为46.25%和53.75%。基因型频率和等位基因频率在两组之间无显著性差异(P>0.05、P>0.05)。结论:TGF-β1-509(C/T)基因多态性与子宫内膜异位症无关联。     

BRCA1 基因启动子区SNPs 与散发性乳腺癌易感性的相关研究

目的:探讨BRCA1基因启动子区rs11655505、rs73625095位点单核苷酸多态性与散发性乳腺癌易感性的关系。方法:采用ASA-PCR方法对200例乳腺癌患者(均经病理确诊)及200例正常女性BRCA1基因启动子区rs11655505(A/G)、rs73625095(A/G)位点单核苷酸多态性(SNP)进行分析,并将其PCR产物进行测序。结果:乳腺癌患者BRCA1基因启动子区rs11655505位点的A/G基因型频率为75%,显著高于正常人的40%;A/A基因型频率为7%,G/G基因型频率为18%,分别低于正常人的30%、30%。此位点的A或G等位基因在乳腺癌病例组及对照组中均无差别(x2=2.427,P=0.119);rs73625095位点的A/G基因型频率为68%,显著高于正常人的15%;G/G基因型频率为32%,低于正常人的84%;乳腺癌病例组中BRCA1基因启动子区rs11655505、rs73625095位点的A/G基因型与淋巴结转移与否相比,差别均有统计学意义(x2=7.321,P=0.026、x2=4.782,P=0.029)。结论:BRCA1基因rs11655505位点、rs736...     

SDF-1 在乳腺癌患者血清中表达水平及临床意义

目的:分析SDF-1在乳腺癌患者外周血中的表达水平,探讨其临床意义。方法:Elisa法检测乳腺癌患者术前及术后血清SDF-1水平,分析其与乳腺癌临床病理特征的关系。结果:乳腺癌患者术前(69例)血清SDF-1水平明显高于正常对照组(20例)(6406.7±1302.5 pg/m L vs 5217.4±1225.7 pg/m L),有明显统计学差异(P<0.01),发生远处转移的乳腺癌患者(11例)血清SDF-1水平明显高于未发生转移者(58例)(7656.4±784.1 pg/m L vs 6169.7±1364.6 pg/m L),差异具有明显统计学意义(P<0.01)。ER及Her-2表达阳性乳腺癌的患者SDF-1水平较ER及Her-2表达阴性者低,差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:SDF-1可能是预测乳腺癌发生及远处转移的重要标志物。     

RNA 干涉介导的Plk1 沉默对乳腺癌细胞恶性生物表型的影响

目的:研究乳腺癌细胞中丝/苏氨酸蛋白激酶Plk1基因表达下调后对其恶性生物表型的影响。方法:利用pSilencer4.1-CMVneo质粒,分别构建针对Plk1基因的RNA干涉载体(pSilencer4.1-shPlk1),利用脂质体Lipofectamine2000转染MCF-7细胞,G418筛选稳定的转染细胞系。半定量RT-PCR和Western blot分别检测Plk1基因mRNA和蛋白表达,MTT和克隆形成试验检测细胞增殖活性的变化,流式细胞仪分析细胞周期和凋亡的变化,最后分析MCF-7细胞对紫杉类药物(紫杉醇和多西他赛)化疗敏感性的变化。结果:成功筛选了稳定转染细胞系(MCF-7/shPlk1和MCF-7/shcontrol)。同MCF-7/shPlk1细胞相比,MCF-7/shPlk1细胞中Plk1基因mRNA和蛋白表达水平分别下调65.8%和74.4%(P<0.05)。同MCF-7/shcontrol,MCF-7/shPlk1细胞增殖速度显著抑制,到第5天时抑制率达到44.9±3.2%(P<0.05)。同时,MCF-7/shPlk1细胞的克隆形成能力显著降低(P<0.01)。流式细胞仪技术分析细胞周期结果表明:MCF-7/shPlk1细胞的G2/M期细胞比例显著增加了21.1±4.1%,而S期细胞比例则显著降低了(18.5±3.1%;P<0.05)。流式细胞仪技术分析细胞凋亡结果表明:MCF-7/shPlk1细胞的凋亡率约显著增加了13.1±2.3%(P<0.05)。同时还发现:MCF-7/shPlk1细胞中激活的caspase-3蛋白显著增加,Bcl-2蛋白显著降低,而Bax蛋白则显著增加。结论:RNA干涉载体能特异性下调乳腺癌细胞中Plk1基因的表达,从而抑制乳腺癌细胞的增殖和体外克隆形成能力,同时诱导乳腺癌细胞的G2/M期阻滞和细胞凋亡率显著增加。因此,靶向Plk1基因的生物治疗有望成为未来临床乳腺癌的一个重要的辅助治疗策略。     

Glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 gene polymorphism and COPD risk in smokers: an updated analysis

We evaluated the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in smokers. A meta-analysis of the published case–control studies was performed. Published literature was retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), with last update in February, 2011. Data were extracted and a fixed- or random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals depending on statistical heterogeneity. Fourteen eligible studies, comprising 1,665 COPD cases and 1,614 controls, were included in the meta-analysis. The combined analyses showed that there was a significant difference in GSTM1 genotype distribution between COPD cases and controls among Caucasians, but not among Asians. The combined GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotype conferred a 1.36-fold greater risk for COPD in Asian smokers. The GSTT1 null genotype alone was not associated with enhanced risk for COPD. The GSTM1 null genotype is significantly associated with an increasing susceptibility to COPD in Caucasian smokers, but not in Asian smokers. The GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotype is a significant risk factor for developing COPD in Asian smokers. The GSTT1 null genotype, however, was not associated with COPD.     

Glutathione S-transferase M1, T1 and P1 genetic polymorphisms, cigarette smoking and gastric cancer risk

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) belong to a superfamily of detoxification enzymes that provide critical defences against a large variety of chemical carcinogens and environmental toxicants. GSTs are present in most epithelial tissues of the human gastrointestinal tract. We investigated associations between genetic variability in specific GST genes (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1), the interaction with cigarette smoking and susceptibility to gastric cancer. The GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms were determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescence resonance energy transfer with Light Cycler Instrument. The study included 70 patients with gastric cancer and 204 controls. Associations between specific genotypes and the development of gastric cancer were examined by use of logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The GSTM1 homozygous null genotype was associated with an increased risk of developing gastric cancer (OR = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.10-3.04). GSTT1 homozygous null genotype and GSTP1 genotypes were not associated with the risk of gastric cancer. Also there was no difference between cases and controls in the frequency of val-105 and ile-105 alleles (p = 0.07). After grouping according to smoking status, GSTM1 null genotype was associated with an increased gastric cancer risk for smokers (OR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.02-4.52). There were no significant differences in the distributions of any of the other GST gene combinations. Our findings suggest that the GSTM1 null genotype may be associated with an increased susceptibility to gastric cancer.     

Prevalence of GSTT1, GSTM1 and NQO1 (609C>T) in Filipino children with ALL (acute lymphoblastic leukaemia)

In the present paper, we examined the incidence of polymorphic genes involved with the detoxification of exogenous chemicals, including carcinogens, namely GSTT1 (glutathione transferase theta1), GSTM1 (glutathione transferase mu1) and NQO1 (NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1) in 60 Filipino paediatric patients with ALL (acute lymphoblastic leukaemia). We found a significantly high incidence of the GSTM1 null genotype in ALL children (71.7%) compared with 51.7% in the control group of children (P<0.05). The GSTT1 null genotype was observed in 35.0% and 33.3% of the ALL cases and the control subjects respectively, with no significant difference. Screening for NQO1 (609C>T) mutant alleles showed a high incidence of the NQO1 C/C genotype (NQO1 homozygous wild-type allele genotype) in 60.0% of ALL cases and was significantly higher than in the control group (23.3%) (P<0.01). These GSTM1 null and NQO1 wild-type genotypes are independently associated with the risk of ALL in Filipino patients. When these two genotypes, GSTM1 null and NQO1 C/C, were combined, the hazard rate for childhood leukaemia was significantly increased (P<0.001). We also noticed that the incidences of GSTM1 null mutations and the NQO1 C/C genotype were significantly higher among Filipinos. These findings suggest a possible role of the GSTM1 null and NQO1 C/C genotypes in the susceptibility of paediatric ALL cases in the Philippines.     

Null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 contribute to increased risk of diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common disease which results from various causes including genetic and environmental factors. Glutathione S-Transferase M1 (GSTM1) and Glutathione S-Transferase T1 (GSTT1) genes are polymorphic in human and the null genotypes lead to the absence of enzyme function. Many studies assessed the associations between GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotypes and DM risk but reported conflicting results. In order to get a more precise estimate of the associations of GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotypes with DM risk, we performed this meta-analysis. Published literature from PubMed, Embase and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases was searched for eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using a fixed- or random-effects model. 11 publications (a total of 2577 cases and 4572 controls) were finally included into this meta-analysis. Meta-analyses indicated that null genotypes of GSTM1/GSTT1 and dual null genotype of GSTM1–GSTT1 were all associated with increased risk of DM (GSTM1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.60, 95%CI 1.10–2.34, P_OR = 0.014; GSTT1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.47, 95%CI 1.12–1.92, P_OR = 0.005; GSTM1–GSTT1: OR _{fixed-effects} = 1.83, 95%CI 1.30–2.59, P_OR = 0.001). Subgroup by ethnicity suggested significant associations between null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 and DM risk among Asians (GSTM1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.77, 95%CI 1.24–2.53, P_OR = 0.002; GSTT1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.58, 95%CI 1.09–2.27, P_OR = 0.015). This meta-analysis suggests null genotypes of GSTM1/GSTT1 and dual null genotype of GSTM1–GSTT1 are all associated with increased risk of DM, and null genotypes of GSTM1/GSTT1 and dual null genotype of GSTM1–GSTT1 are potential biomarkers of DM.     

The role of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, and OGG1 polymorphisms in type 2 diabetes mellitus risk: a case-control study in a Turkish population

The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of some polymorphisms in GSTs (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) which are very important protective mechanisms against oxidative stress and in OGG1 gene which is important in DNA repair, against the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). 127 T2DM and 127 control subjects were included in the study. DNA was extracted from whole blood. Analyses of GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms were performed by allele specific PCR and those of GSTP1 Ile105Val and OGG1 Ser326Cys by PCR-RFLP. Our data showed that GSTM1 null genotype frequency had a 2-6 times statistically significant increase in a patient group (OR=3.841, 95% CI=2.280-6.469, p<0.001) but no significance with GSTT1 null/positive and GSTP1 Ile105Val genotypes was observed. When T2DM patients with OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism were compared with patients with a wild genotype, a 2-3 times statistically significant increase has been observed (OR 1.858, 95% CI=1.099-3.141, p=0.021). The combined effect of GSTM1 null and OGG1 variant genotype frequencies has shown to be statistically significant. Similarly, the risk of T2DM was statistically increased with GSTM1 null (OR=3.841, 95% CI=2.28-6.469), GSTT1 null+GSTP1 (H+M) (OR=4.118, 95% CI=1.327-12.778) and GSTM1 null+OGG1 (H+M) (OR=3.322, 95% CI=1.898-5.816) and GSTT1 null+OGG1 (H+M) (OR=2.179, 95% CI=1.083-4.386) as compared to the control group. According to our study results, it has been observed that the combined evaluation of GSTM1-GSTT1-GSTP1 and OGG1 Ser326Cys gene polymorphisms can be used as candidate genes in the etiology of T2DM, especially in the development of T2DM.     

Genetic polymorphisms of GSTT1, GSTM1, and NQO1 genes and diabetes mellitus risk in Chinese population

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the present study were to assess whether the glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1), M1 (GSTM1), and NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) genotypes are associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2 DM) and to ascertain whether the levels of blood lipids given exposure to diabetes are modified by the specific genetic polymorphisms of GSTT1, GSTM1, and NQO1. METHODS: This case-control study was conducted on 200 subjects. The genotypes were determined using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: The GSTT1-present genotype conferred a statistically significant 0.49-fold reduction in risk of T2 DM relative to the null genotype. Individuals with GSTT1-null or GSTM1-null genotype had higher levels of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a), respectively. There was no association between either GSTM1 or NQO1 polymorphism and risk of T2 DM. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that the GSTT1 gene may contribute to the development of T2 DM and may be one of the candidate genes of T2 DM in Chinese population.     

Glutathione S-transferase mu 1 (GSTM1) and theta 1 (GSTT1) genetic polymorphisms and atopic asthma in children from Southeastern Brazil

Xenobiotics can trigger degranulation of eosinophils and mast cells. In this process, the cells release several substances leading to bronchial hyperactivity, the main feature of atopic asthma (AA). GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes encode enzymes involved in the inactivation of these compounds. Both genes are polymorphic in humans and have a null variant genotype in which both the gene and corresponding enzyme are absent. An increased risk for disease in individuals with the null GST genotypes is therefore, but this issue is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes on the occurrence of AA, as well as on its clinical manifestations. Genomic DNA from 86 patients and 258 controls was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. The frequency of the GSTM1 null genotype in patients was higher than that found in controls (60.5% versus 40.3%, p = 0.002). In individuals with the GSTM1 null genotype the risk of manifested AA was 2.3-fold higher (95%CI: 1.4-3.7) than for others. In contrast, similar frequencies of GSTT1 null and combined GSTM1 plus GSTT1 null genotypes were seen in both groups. No differences in genotype frequencies were perceived in patients stratified by age, gender, ethnic origin, and severity of the disease. These results suggest that the inherited absence of the GSTM1 metabolic pathway may alter the risk of AA in southeastern Brazilian children, although this must be confirmed by further studies with a larger cohort of patients and age-matched controls from the distinct regions of the country.     

Relation of glutathione S-transferase T1, M1 and P1 genotypes and breast cancer risk

The aim of this study was to investigate associations between genetic variability in specific Glutathione S-transferases (GST) genes (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) and susceptibility to breast cancer. Genotypes of blood specimen DNA were determined for 65 women with incident cases of breast cancer and 108 control subjects. Associations between specific genotypes and the development of breast cancer were examined by the use of logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Neither GSTT1 nor GSTM1 homozygous null genotype was associated with a significant increased risk of developing breast cancer. The presence of valine alleles compared to isoleucine alleles in codon 105 in GSTP1 did not increase the risk of breast cancer development. The risk of breast cancer associated with a combined GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotype was 3.37 (95% CI = 0.76-2.95, p = 0.115). The only significant association between increased risk of breast cancer development and GSTs polymorphisms was found when GSTT1 null, GSTM1 null and the presence of valine in GSTP1 in codon 105 were combined (p < 0.048, OR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.01-13.90). Our findings suggest that combined genetic variability in members of the GST gene family may be associated with an increased susceptibility to breast cancer.     

Glutathione S-Transferase M1, T1, P1 Genotypes and Risk for Development of Colorectal Cancer

The glutathione S-transferase (GST) supergene family is an important part of cellular enzyme defense against endogenous and exogenous chemicals, many of which have carcinogenic potential. The present investigation was conducted to detect a possible association between polymorphisms at the GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 genes and the interaction with cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer incidence. We examined 181 patients with colorectal cancer and 204 controls. DNA was extracted from whole blood, and the GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms were determined using a real-time polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence resonance energy transfer with a Light-Cycler instrument. Associations between specific genotypes and the development of colorectal cancer were examined by use of logistic regression analysis to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The GSTM1 polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.06–2.46). Also the risk of colorectal cancer associated with the GSTT1 null genotype was 1.64 (95% CI: 1.10–2.59). Statistically no differences were found between patients with colorectal cancer and control groups for the GSTP1 Ile/Ile, Ile/Val and Val/Val genotypes. In addition, the frequencies of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion genotypes differed significantly between the cases and controls for current smokers; the GSTT1 null genotype especially is associated with a greater risk of colorectal cancer (OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.24–4.81). The GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletions were associated with an increased risk of developing a transverse or rectal tumor (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.15–3.00; OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.02–2.84; respectively). The glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms were not associated with risk in patients stratified by age. The risk of colorectal cancer increased as putative high-risk genotypes increased for the combined genotypes of GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null, and either GSTP1 valine heterozygosity or GSTP1 valine homozygosity (OR = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.02–7.11). In conclusion, the results obtained in this study clearly suggest that those susceptibility factors related to different GST polymorphic enzymes are predisposing for colorectal cancer.