DNA bending and twisting properties of integration host factor determined by DNA cyclization

The binding of many proteins to DNA is profoundly affected by DNA bending, twisting, and supercoiling. When protein binding alters DNA conformation, interaction between inherent and induced DNA conformation can affect protein binding affinity and specificity. Integration host factor (IHF), a sequence-specific, DNA-binding protein of Escherichia coli, strongly bends the DNA upon binding. To assess the influence of inherent DNA bending on IHF binding, we took advantage of the high degree of natural static curvature associated with an IHF site on a 163-bp minicircle and measured the binding affinity of IHF for its recognition site contained on this DNA in both circular and linear form. IHF showed a higher affinity for the circular form of the DNA when compared to the linear form. In addition, the presence of IHF during DNA cyclization changed the topology of cyclization products and their ability to bind IHF, consistent with IHF untwisting DNA. These results show that inherent DNA conformation anisotropy is an important determinant of IHF binding affinity and suggests a mechanism for modulation of IHF activity by local DNA conformation.     

Comparison of protein binding to DNA in vivo and in vitro: defining an effective intracellular target.

We have quantitatively evaluated the affinity of a set of target sites for the integration host factor (IHF) protein of Escherichia coli by their performance as competitors in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. We also determined how well each of these sites is filled by IHF in vivo. The data show that several natural sites have an affinity not much greater than that required for intracellular occupancy. The data also indicate that very little of the IHF in a cell is present as free protein available for binding, suggesting that binding to non-specific targets dominates the operation of this system. The correlation between in vitro affinity and in vivo occupancy provides a ready means to assess the likely physiological significance of putative IHF sites. It also provides a general method to assess the importance of non-specific interactions by DNA binding proteins inside a cell.     

Gamma delta transposase and integration host factor bind cooperatively at both ends of gamma delta.

gamma delta, a prokaryotic transposon, encodes a transposase that is essential for its transposition. We show here, by DNase I protection experiments, that purified gamma delta transposase binds at the transposon's inverted repeats (IRs). Immediately adjacent to each transposase binding site (and within gamma delta DNA) we have identified a binding site for an additional protein factor, the Escherichia coli-encoded integration host factor (IHF). The binding of transposase and IHF to these adjacent sites is mutually cooperative. An IHF binding-site was also found in the original target DNA, just outside one of the ends of gamma delta. The affinity of IHF for this flanking site is reduced by transposase. These results demonstrate that gamma delta transposase binds at the IRs of gamma delta, and suggest that IHF may be involved in forming a transposase-DNA complex and/or influencing the target site selection during the transposition of gamma delta.     

Cyclic changes in the affinity of protein-DNA interactions drive the progression and regulate the outcome of the Tn10 transposition reaction

The Tn10 transpososome is a DNA processing machine in which two transposon ends, a transposase dimer and the host protein integration host factor (IHF), are united in an asymmetrical complex. The transitions that occur during one transposition cycle are not limited to chemical cleavage events at the transposon ends, but also involve a reorganization of the protein and DNA components. Here, we demonstrate multiple pathways for Tn10 transposition. We show that one series of events is favored over all others and involves cyclic changes in the affinity of IHF for its binding site. During transpososome assembly, IHF is bound with high affinity. However, the affinity for IHF drops dramatically after cleavage of the first transposon end, leading to IHF ejection and unfolding of the complex. The ejection of IHF promotes cleavage of the second end, which is followed by restoration of the high affinity state which in turn regulates target interactions.     

The interaction of E. coli IHF protein with its specific binding sites

We have used two kinds of footprinting techniques, dimethylsulfate interference and hydroxyl radical protection, to explore the way that IHF recognizes its specific target sequences. Our results lead us to conclude that IHF recognizes DNA primarily through contacts with the minor groove, an unprecedented mode for a sequence-specific binding protein. We have also determined that, although IHF is a small protein that protects a large region of DNA, only a single IHF protomer is present at each binding site. IHF bends the DNA to which it binds. We have combined this fact plus our footprinting and stoichiometry data together with the crystal structure of a related protein, the nonspecific DNA binding protein HU, to propose a model for the way in which IHF binds to its DNA target.     

Indirect recognition in sequence-specific DNA binding by Escherichia coli integration host factor: the role of DNA deformation energy

Integration host factor (IHF) is a bacterial histone-like protein whose primary biological role is to condense the bacterial nucleoid and to constrain DNA supercoils. It does so by binding in a sequence-independent manner throughout the genome. However, unlike other structurally related bacterial histone-like proteins, IHF has evolved a sequence-dependent, high affinity DNA-binding motif. The high affinity binding sites are important for the regulation of a wide range of cellular processes. A remarkable feature of IHF is that it employs an indirect readout mechanism to bind and wrap DNA at both the nonspecific and high affinity (sequence-dependent) DNA sites. In this study we assessed the contributions of pre-formed and protein-induced DNA conformations to the energetics of IHF binding. Binding energies determined experimentally were compared with energies predicted for the IHF-induced deformation of the DNA helix (DNA deformation energy) in the IHF-DNA complex. Combinatorial sets of de novo DNA sequences were designed to systematically evaluate the influence of sequence-dependent structural characteristics of the conserved IHF recognition elements of the consensus DNA sequence. We show that IHF recognizes pre-formed conformational characteristics of the consensus DNA sequence at high affinity sites, whereas at all other sites relative affinity is determined by the deformational energy required for nearest-neighbor base pairs to adopt the DNA structure of the bound DNA-IHF complex.     

Mechanisms of specific and nonspecific binding of architectural proteins in prokaryotic gene regulation

IHF and HU are small basic proteins of eubacteria that bind as homodimers to double-stranded DNA and bend the duplex to promote architectures required for gene regulation. These architectural proteins share a common alpha/beta fold but exhibit different nucleic acid binding surfaces and distinct functional roles. With respect to DNA-binding specificity, for example, IHF is sequence specific, while HU is not. We have employed Raman difference spectroscopy and gel mobility assays to characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying such differences in DNA recognition. Parallel studies of solution complexes of IHF and HU with the same DNA nonadecamer (5' --> 3' sequence: TC TAAGTAGTTGATTCATA, where the phage lambda H1 consensus sequence of IHF is underlined) show the following. (i) The structure of the targeted DNA site is altered much more dramatically by IHF than by HU binding. (ii) In the IHF complex, the structural perturbations encompass both the sugar-phosphate backbone and the bases of the consensus sequence, whereas only the DNA backbone is altered by HU binding. (iii) In the presence of excess protein, complexes of order higher than 1 dimer per duplex are detected for HU:DNA, though not for IHF:DNA. The results differentiate structural motifs of IHF:DNA and HU:DNA solution complexes, provide Raman signatures of prokaryotic sequence-specific and nonspecific recognition, and suggest that the architectural role of HU may involve the capability to recruit additional binding partners to even relatively short DNA sequences.     

The F plasmid-encoded TraM protein stimulates relaxosome-mediated cleavage at oriT through an interaction with TraI

Conjugative DNA transfer is a highly conserved process for the direct transfer of DNA from a donor to a recipient. The conjugative initiator proteins are key players in the DNA processing reactions that initiate DNA transfer - they introduce a site- and strand-specific break in the DNA backbone via a transesterification that leaves the initiator protein covalently bound on the 5'-end of the cleaved DNA strand. The action of the initiator protein at the origin of transfer (oriT) is governed by auxiliary proteins that alter the architecture of the DNA molecule, allowing binding of the initiator protein. In the F plasmid system, two auxiliary proteins have roles in establishing the relaxosome: the host-encoded IHF and the plasmid-encoded TraY. Together, these proteins direct the loading of TraI which contains the catalytic centre for the transesterification. The F-oriT sequence includes a binding site for another plasmid-encoded protein, TraM, which is required for DNA transfer. Here the impact of TraM protein on the formation and activity of the F plasmid relaxosome has been examined. Purified TraM stimulates the formation of relaxed DNA in a reaction that requires the minimal components of the relaxosome, TraI, TraY and IHF. Unlike TraY and IHF, TraM is not essential for the formation of the relaxosome in vitro and TraM cannot substitute for either TraY or IHF in this process. The TraM binding site sbmC, along with both IHF binding sites, is essential for stimulation of the relaxase reaction. In addition, stimulation of transesterification appears to require the C-terminal domain of TraI suggesting that TraM and TraI may interact through this domain on TraI. Taken together, these results provide additional evidence of a role for TraM as a component of the relaxosome, suggest a previously unknown interaction between TraI and TraM, and allow us to propose a molecular role for the C-terminal domain of TraI.     

The P1 plasmid partition complex at parS. The influence of Escherichia coli integration host factor and of substrate topology

The P1 ParB protein is required for active partition and thus stable inheritance of the plasmid prophage. ParB and the Escherichia coli protein integration host factor (IHF) participate in the assembly of a partition complex at the centromere-like site parS. In this report the role of IHF in the formation of the partition complex has been explored. First, ParB protein was purified for these studies, which revealed that ParB forms a dimer in solution. Next, the IHF binding site was mapped to a 29-base pair region within parS, including the sequence TAACTGACTGTTT (which differs from the IHF consensus in two positions). IHF induced a strong bend in the DNA at its binding site. Versions of parS which have lost or damaged the IHF binding site bound ParB with greatly reduced affinity in vitro and in vivo. Measurements of binding constants showed that IHF increased ParB affinity for the wild-type parS site by about 10,000-fold. Finally, DNA supercoiling improved ParB binding in the presence of IHF but not in its absence. These observations led to the proposal that IHF and superhelicity assist ParB by promoting its precise positioning at parS, a spatial arrangement that results in a high affinity of ParB for parS.     

H-NS binds with high affinity to the Tn10 transpososome and promotes transpososome stabilization

H-NS is a bacterial DNA-binding protein that regulates gene expression and DNA transposition. In the case of Tn10, H-NS binds directly to the transposition machinery (i.e. the transpososome) to influence the outcome of the reaction. In the current work we evaluated the binding affinity of H-NS for two forms of the Tn10 transpososome, including the initial folded form and a pre-unfolded form. These two forms differ in that IHF is bound to the former but not the latter. IHF binding induces a bend (or fold) in the transposon end that facilitates transpososome formation. However, the continued presence of IHF in the transpososome inhibits intermolecular transposition events. We show that H-NS binds particularly strongly to the pre-unfolded transpososome with an apparent K_d of ∼0.3 nM. This represents the highest affinity interaction between H-NS and a binding partner documented to date. We also show that binding of H-NS to the transpososome stabilizes this structure and propose that both high-affinity binding and stabilization result from the combined interaction between H-NS and DNA and H-NS and transposase within the transpososome. Mechanistic implications for tight binding of H-NS to the transpososome and transpososome stabilization are considered.     

Quantitative analysis of the binding of simian virus 40 large T antigen to DNA

SV40 large T antigen (T-ag) is a multifunctional protein that successively binds to 5'-GAGGC-3' sequences in the viral origin of replication, melts the origin, unwinds DNA ahead of the replication fork, and interacts with host DNA replication factors to promote replication of the simian virus 40 genome. The transition of T-ag from a sequence-specific binding protein to a nonspecific helicase involves its assembly into a double hexamer whose formation is likely dictated by the propensity of T-ag to oligomerize and its relative affinities for the origin as well as for nonspecific double- and single-stranded DNA. In this study, we used a sensitive assay based on fluorescence anisotropy to measure the affinities of wild-type and mutant forms of the T-ag origin-binding domain (OBD), and of a larger fragment containing the N-terminal domain (N260), for different DNA substrates. We report that the N-terminal domain does not contribute to binding affinity but reduces the propensity of the OBD to self-associate. We found that the OBD binds with different affinities to its four sites in the origin and determined a consensus binding site by systematic mutagenesis of the 5'-GAGGC-3' sequence and of the residue downstream of it, which also contributes to affinity. Interestingly, the OBD also binds to single-stranded DNA with an approximately 10-fold higher affinity than to nonspecific duplex DNA and in a mutually exclusive manner. Finally, we provide evidence that the sequence specificity of full-length T-ag is lower than that of the OBD. These results provide a quantitative basis onto which to anchor our understanding of the interaction of T-ag with the origin and its assembly into a double hexamer.     

Examining the contribution of a dA+dT element to the conformation of Escherichia coli integration host factor-DNA complexes.

DNA binding proteins that induce structural changes in DNA are common in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Integration host factor (IHF) is a multi-functional DNA binding and bending protein of Escherichia coli that can mediate protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions by bending DNA. Previously we have shown that the presence of a dA+dT element 5'-proximal to an IHF consensus sequence can affect the binding of IHF to a particular site. In this study the contribution of various sequence elements to the formation of IHF-DNA complexes was examined. We show that IHF bends DNA more when it binds to a site containing a dA+dT element upstream of its core consensus element than to a site lacking a dA+dT element. We demonstrate that IHF can be specifically crosslinked to DNA with binding sites either containing or lacking this dA+dT element. These results indicate the importance of flanking DNA and a dA+dT element in the binding and bending of a site by IHF.     

Interaction of bacteriophage T7 gene 4 primase with its template recognition site

The primase fragment of the bacteriophage T7 63-kDa gene 4 helicase/primase protein contains the 271 N-terminal amino acid residues and lacks helicase activity. The primase fragment catalyzes the synthesis of oligoribonucleotides at rates similar to those catalyzed by the full-length protein in the presence of a 5-nucleotide DNA template containing a primase recognition site (5'-GGGTC-3', 5'-TGGTC-3', 5'-GTGTC-3', or 5'-TTGTC-3'). Although it is not copied into the oligoribonucleotides, the cytosine at the 3'-position is essential for synthesis and template binding. Two nucleotides flanking the 3'-end of the recognition site are required for tight DNA binding and rapid oligoribonucleotide synthesis. Nucleotides added to the 5'-end have no effect on the rate of oligoribonucleotide synthesis or the affinity of the primase for DNA. The binding of either ATP or CTP significantly increases the affinity of the primase for its DNA template. DNA lacking a primase recognition site does not inhibit oligoribonucleotide synthesis, suggesting that the primase binds DNA in a sequence-specific manner. The affinity of the primase for templates is weak, ranging from 10 to 150 microM. The tight DNA binding (<1 microM) observed with the 63-kDa gene 4 protein occurs via interactions between DNA templates and the helicase domain.     

Dual DNA recognition codes of a short peptide derived from the basic leucine zipper protein EmBP1

Sequence-specific DNA binding of short peptide dimers derived from a plant basic leucine zipper protein EmBP1 was studied. A homodimer of the EmBP1 basic region peptide recognized a palindromic DNA sequence, and a heterodimer of EmBP1 and GCN4 basic region peptides targets a non-palindromic DNA sequence when a beta-cyclodextrin/adamantane complex is utilized as a dimerization domain. A homodimer of the EmBP1 basic region peptide binds the native EmBP1 binding 5'-GCCACGTGGC-3' and the native GCN4 binding 5'-ATGACGTCAT-3' sequences with almost equal affinity in the alpha-helical conformation, indicating that the basic region of EmBP1 by itself has a dual recognition codes for the DNA sequences. The GCN4 basic region peptide binds 5'-ATGAC-3' in the alpha-helical conformation, but it neither shows affinity nor helix formation with 5'-GCCAC-3'. Because native EmBP1 forms 100 times more stable complex with 5'-GCCACGTGGC-3' over 5'-ATGACGTCAT-3', our results suggest that the sequence-selectivity of native EmBP1 is dictated by the structure of leucine zipper dimerization domain including the hinge region spanning between the basic region and the leucine zipper.     

Base coupling in sequence-specific site recognition by the ETS domain of murine PU.1

The ETS domain of murine PU.1 tolerates a large number of DNA cognates bearing a central consensus 5'-GGAA-3' that is flanked by a diverse combination of bases on both sides. Previous attempts to define the sequence selectivity of this DNA binding domain by combinatorial methods have not successfully predicted observed patterns among in vivo promoter sequences in the genome, and have led to the hypothesis that energetic coupling occurs among the bases in the flanking sequences. To test this hypothesis, we determined, using thermodynamic cycles, the complex stabilities and base coupling energies of the PU.1 ETS domain for a set of 26 cognate variants (based on the lambdaB site of the Ig(lambda)2-4 enhancer, 5'-AATAAAAGGAAGTGAAACCAA-3') in which flanking sequences up to three bases upstream and/or two bases downstream of the core consensus are substituted. We observed that both cooperative and anticooperative coupling occurs commonly among the flanking sequences at all the positions investigated. This phenomenon extends at least three bases in the 5' side and is, at least on our experimental data, due exclusively to pairwise interactions between the flanking bases, and not changes in the local environment of the DNA groove floor. Energetic coupling also occurs between the flanking sides across the core consensus, suggesting long-range conformational effects along the DNA target and/or in the protein. Our data provide an energetic explanation for the pattern of flanking bases observed among in vivo promoter sequences and reconcile the apparent discrepancies raised by the combinatorial experiments. We also discuss the significance of base coupling in light of an indirect readout mechanism in ETS/DNA site recognition.