Heterodimeric complex of RAR and RXR nuclear receptor ligand-binding domains: purification, crystallization, and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis

Both the human retinoic acid receptor alpha (hRARalpha) and a constitutively active mutant (F318A) of the mouse retinoid X receptor alpha (mRXR alpha F318A) ligand-binding domains were separately overexpressed in Escherichia coli, copurified as a heterodimer in a two-step procedure, and cocrystallized with an RAR alpha-specific antagonist by using polyethylene glycol 10,000 as precipitant. The crystals grew in the hexagonal space group P6(1)22 displaying the unit cell parameters a = b = 116.6 A and c = 207.8 A. They diffracted X-ray to a limit of 2.2-A resolution. The asymmetric unit comprises one heterodimer and the crystal contains 60% solvent. The structure was determined by molecular replacement and is currently being refined.     

Binding of type II nuclear receptors and estrogen receptor to full and half-site estrogen response elements in vitro.

The mechanism by which retinoids, thyroid hormone (T3) and estrogens modulate the growth of breast cancer cells is unclear. Since nuclear type II nuclear receptors, including retinoic acid receptor (RAR), retinoid X receptor (RXR) and thyroid hormone receptor (TR), bind direct repeats (DR) of the estrogen response elements (ERE) half-site (5'-AGGTCA-3'), we examined the ability of estrogen receptor (ER) versus type II nuclear receptors, i.e. RARalpha, beta and gamma, RXRbeta, TRalpha and TRbeta, to bind various EREs in vitro . ER bound a consensus ERE, containing a perfectly palindromic 17 bp inverted repeat (IR), as a homodimer. In contrast, ER did not bind to a single ERE half-site. Likewise, ER did not bind two tandem (38 bp apart) half-sites, but low ER binding was detected to three tandem copies of the same half-site. RARalpha,beta or gamma bound both ERE and half-site constructs as a homodimer. RXRbeta did not bind full or half-site EREs, nor did RXRbeta enhance RARalpha binding to a full ERE. However, RARalpha and RXRbeta bound a half-site ERE cooperatively forming a dimeric complex. The RARalpha-RXRbeta heterodimer bound the Xenopus vitellogenin B1 estrogen responsive unit, with two non-consensus EREs, with higher affinity than one or two copies of the full or half-site ERE. Both TRalpha and TRbeta bound the full and the half-site ERE as monomers and homodimers and cooperatively as heterodimers with RXRbeta. We suggest that the cellular concentrations of nuclear receptors and their ligands, and the nature of the ERE or half-site sequence and those of its flanking sequences determine the occupation of EREs in estrogen-regulated genes in vivo .     

Crystal structure of the human receptor activity-modifying protein 1 extracellular domain

Receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 1 forms a heterodimer with calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and regulates its transport to the cell surface. The CRLR.RAMP1 heterodimer functions as a specific receptor for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Here, we report the crystal structure of the human RAMP1 extracellular domain. The RAMP1 structure is a three-helix bundle that is stabilized by three disulfide bonds. The RAMP1 residues important for cell-surface expression of the CRLR.RAMP1 heterodimer are clustered to form a hydrophobic patch on the molecular surface. The hydrophobic patch is located near the tryptophan residue essential for binding of the CGRP antagonist, BIBN4096BS. These results suggest that the hydrophobic patch participates in the interaction with CRLR and the formation of the ligand-binding pocket when it forms the CRLR.RAMP1 heterodimer.     

Retinoid X receptor (RXR) agonist-induced activation of dominant-negative RXR-retinoic acid receptor alpha403 heterodimers is developmentally regulated during myeloid differentiation

The multiple biologic activities of retinoic acid (RA) are mediated through RAR and retinoid X receptor (RXR) nuclear receptors that interact with specific DNA target sequences as heterodimers (RXR-RAR) or homodimers (RXR-RXR). RA receptor activation appears critical to regulating important aspects of hematopoiesis, since transducing a COOH-terminally truncated RARalpha exhibiting dominant-negative activity (RARalpha403) into normal mouse bone marrow generates hematopoietic growth factor-dependent cell lines frozen at the multipotent progenitor (EML) or committed promyelocyte (MPRO) stages. Nevertheless, relatively high, pharmacological concentrations of RA (1 to 10 microM) overcome these differentiation blocks and induce terminal granulocytic differentiation of the MPRO promyelocytes while potentiating interleukin-3 (IL-3)-induced commitment of EML cells to the granulocyte/monocyte lineage. In the present study, we utilized RXR- and RAR-specific agonists and antagonists to determine how RA overcomes the dominant-negative activity of the truncated RARalpha in these different myeloid developmental stages. Unexpectedly, we observed that an RXR-specific, rather than an RAR-specific, agonist induces terminal granulocytic differentiation of MPRO promyelocytes, and this differentiation is associated with activation of DNA response elements corresponding to RAR-RXR heterodimers rather than RXR-RXR homodimers. This RXR agonist activity is blocked by RAR-specific antagonists, suggesting extensive cross-talk between the partners of the RXR-RARalpha403 heterodimer. In contrast, in the more immature, multipotent EML cells we observed that this RXR-specific agonist is inactive either in potentiating IL-3-mediated commitment of EML cells to the granulocyte lineage or in transactivating RAR-RXR response elements. RA-triggered GALdbd-RARalpha hybrid activity in these cells indicates that the multipotent EML cells harbor substantial nuclear hormone receptor coactivator activity. However, the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor trichostatin A readily activates an RXR-RAR reporter construct in the multipotent EML cells but not in the committed MPRO promyelocytes, indicating that differences in HDAC-containing repressor complexes in these two closely related but distinct hematopoietic lineages might account for the differential activation of the RXR-RARalpha403 heterodimers that we observed at these different stages of myeloid development.     

Evidence for DNA-binding domain--ligand-binding domain communications in the androgen receptor

DNA binding as well as ligand binding by nuclear receptors has been studied extensively. Both binding functions are attributed to isolated domains of which the structure is known. The crystal structure of a complete receptor in complex with its ligand and DNA-response element, however, has been solved only for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ)-retinoid X receptor α (RXRα) heterodimer. This structure provided the first indication of direct interactions between the DNA-binding domain (DBD) and ligand-binding domain (LBD). In this study, we investigated whether there is a similar interface between the DNA- and ligand-binding domains for the androgen receptor (AR). Despite the structural differences between the AR- and PPARγ-LBD, a combination of in silico modeling and docking pointed out a putative interface between AR-DBD and AR-LBD. The surfaces were subjected to a point mutation analysis, which was inspired by known AR mutations described in androgen insensitivity syndromes and prostate cancer. Surprisingly, AR-LBD mutations D695N, R710A, F754S, and P766A induced a decrease in DNA binding but left ligand binding unaffected, while the DBD-residing mutations K590A, K592A, and E621A lowered the ligand-binding but not the DNA-binding affinity. We therefore propose that these residues are involved in allosteric communications between the AR-DBD and AR-LBD.