Development of an optimal antigen retrieval protocol for immunohistochemistry of retinoblastoma protein (pRB) in formalin fixed, paraffin sections based on comparison of different methods

A novel protocol for antigen retrieval (AR) for immunohistochemistry (IHC) of retinoblastoma protein (pRB) in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue sections was developed using 0.05% citraconic anhydride as the AR solution for heat treatment based on comparison of different methods. This new protocol has advantages including superior morphological preservation, greater reproducibility, and more intense staining after retrieval. Our study demonstrates the importance of comparing various AR protocols to obtain maximal IHC for standardization and for quantitative IHC.     

Standardization in immunohistochemistry: the role of antigen retrieval in molecular morphology

In performing in situ hybridizations, nonisotopic nucleic acid labeling coupled with colorimetric detection offers a safer, easier and more rapid alternative to using radioactively labeled nucleic acid probes and microscopic autoradiography. Whole mount in situ hybridization is also advantageous, because many samples can be processed identically and the reduced handling of specimens greatly reduces the risk of exposing tissues to RNase(s). The thickness of whole mount specimens, however, often prevents accurate determination of sites of expression within specific tissues. Although post-hybridization embedding and sectioning is a solution to this problem, the precipitate formed following the common colorimetric detection procedure is soluble in the organic solvents used for dehydration prior to embedding. We have developed a dehydration and embedding procedure that takes advantage of the compatibility of L.R. White^® resin containing 10% (v/v) polyethylene glycol 400, and heat polymerized. The addition of the plasticizer allows L.R. White^® embedded tissues to be sectioned at 10 μm providing excellent signal contrast.     

Standardization in immunohistochemistry: the role of antigen retrieval in molecular morphology

Molecular morphology seeks to integrate the traditional morphologic criteria of surgical pathology with immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization techniques that allow demonstration of a variety of molecules, proteins, RNA and DNA in a tissue section. While immunohistochemistry has proven to be successful for demonstrating lineage related biomarkers of value for diagnosis and classification of tumors, concerns have been raised periodically about validation of reagents, overall reproducibility of the staining method, and interpretation of results. These concerns have been heightened by the burgeoning interest in prognostic markers, where the question extends beyond a relatively simple positive or negative result to an absolute need for quantification of the staining result; not only is it positive, but how much is there? In this presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Biological Stain Commission in June, 2005, I advocate a total test approach that requires systematic attention to pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic issues. The approach encompasses all aspects of test performance from specimen acquisition, through fixation, antigen retrieval, processing, staining, interpretation, and reporting of results. A similar systematic approach also may be adopted for in situ hybridization methods, which have performance requirements that in many ways parallel immunohistochemistry.     

Comparative Study of Antigen Retrieval Heating Methods: Microwave, Microwave and Pressure Cooker, Autoclave, and Steamer

We present a study comparing the most popular beating methods currently used for antigen retrieval (AR) immunostaining: the microwave oven, microwave with pressure cooker, autoclave, and steamer heating. A panel of 21 antibodies was tested on formalin fixed, paraffin embedded sections using these heating methods and Tris-HC1 buffer, pH 9.5, plus 5% urea as the AR solution. Three observers independently evaluated the intensity of AR immunostaining. All heating methods yielded good results for AR immunostaining. There were only minor differences among the heating methods for AR when the optimal concentration of primary antibody for normal immunostaining was used; however, background staining may occasionally be troublesome if antibodies are not retitrated and diluted further for use on tissues after AR. Significant differences were observed only after further dilution of the primary antibodies; the microwave pressure cooker, extended microwave heating (5 min × 4) and autoclave heating then showed a similar intensity of staining that was stronger than results obtained with the steamer (20 min) or regular microwave heating (5 min × 2 J. Extension of the steamer heating time, however, yielded equivalent results. This study indicates that different heating methods can yield similar intensities of AR immunostaining if the heating times are adjusted appropriately. It is noteworthy that, in general, the adjusted conditions for maximal retrieval differ from those most widely cited in the literature, or recommended by manufacturers. That several heating devices may provide similar results permits the use of different AR heating methods according to the equipment available. This study also is an early step in standardizing the AR immunostaining protocol by providing uniform conditions for “maximal retrieval” as a common end point for all laboratories.     

Combined effects of formalin fixation and tissue processing on immunorecognition

Abstract

It is accepted that aldehyde-based fixation of cells can affect immunodetection of antigens; however, the effects of tissue processing on immunodetection have not been analyzed systematically. We investigated the effects of aldehyde-based fixation and the various cumulative steps of tissue processing on immunohistochemical detection of specific antigens. DU145 (prostate) and SKOV3 (ovarian) cancer cell lines were cultured as monolayers on microscope slides. Immunohistochemical detection of Ki67/MIB-1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) was evaluated after various fixation times in 10% neutral buffered formalin and after each of the several cumulative steps of tissue processing. The effect of antigen retrieval (AR) was evaluated concomitantly as an additional variable. Our results indicate that in addition to fixation, each of the tissue processing steps has effects on immunorecognition of the epitopes recognized by these antibodies. Extensive dehydration through ethanols to absolute ethanol had only modest effects, except for the detection of Ki67/MIB-1 in SKOV-3 cells where the effect was stronger. In general, however, establishment of a hydrophobic environment by xylene resulted in the greatest decrease in immunorecognition. AR compensated for most, but not all, of the losses in staining following fixation and exposure to xylene; however, AR gave consistent results for most steps of tissue processing, which suggests that AR also should be used for staining PCNA. The cellular variations that were observed indicate that the effects of fixation and other steps of tissue processing may depend on how antigens are packaged by specific cells.     

A comparison of microwave heating and proteolytic pretreatment antigen retrieval techniques in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissues

Antigen retrieval (AR) is a technique that re-exposes epitopes in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded sections and makes them detectable by immunohistochemistry. We compared the effects of two AR procedures, enzyme digestion and microwave heating, on immunostaining of vimentin and desmin in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissues. Our results showed that AR is necessary for vimentin and desmin immunostaining in tissues fixed in formalin for more than 48 h. With prolonged fixation times, microwave heating showed better results than enzyme digestion for AR. The same results were obtained using 1% zinc sulfate or Citra Plus solution as retrieval solutions for microwave heating. We recommend microwave heating for AR, because it is easier to use and produces better results compared to enzyme treatment.     

A comparison of microwave heating and proteolytic pretreatment antigen retrieval techniques in formalin fixed,paraffin embedded tissues

Antigen retrieval (AR) is a technique that re-exposes epitopes in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded sections and makes them detectable by immunohistochemistry. We compared the effects of two AR procedures, enzyme digestion and microwave heating, on immunostaining of vimentin and desmin in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissues. Our results showed that AR is necessary for vimentin and desmin immunostaining in tissues fixed in formalin for more than 48 h. With prolonged fixation times, microwave heating showed better results than enzyme digestion for AR. The same results were obtained using 1% zinc sulfate or Citra Plus solution as retrieval solutions for microwave heating. We recommend microwave heating for AR, because it is easier to use and produces better results compared to enzyme treatment.     

Two methods for proteomic analysis of formalin‐fixed,paraffin embedded tissue result in differential protein identification,data quality,and cost

Formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue is a rich source of clinically relevant material that can yield important translational biomarker discovery using proteomic analysis. Protocols for analyzing FFPE tissue by LC‐MS/MS exist, but standardization of procedures and critical analysis of data quality is limited. This study compared and characterized data obtained from FFPE tissue using two methods: a urea in‐solution digestion method (UISD) versus a commercially available Qproteome FFPE Tissue Kit method (Qkit). Each method was performed independently three times on serial sections of homogenous FFPE tissue to minimize pre‐analytical variations and analyzed with three technical replicates by LC‐MS/MS. Data were evaluated for reproducibility and physiochemical distribution, which highlighted differences in the ability of each method to identify proteins of different molecular weights and isoelectric points. Each method replicate resulted in a significant number of new protein identifications, and both methods identified significantly more proteins using three technical replicates as compared to only two. UISD was cheaper, required less time, and introduced significant protein modifications as compared to the Qkit method, which provided more precise and higher protein yields. These data highlight significant variability among method replicates and type of method used, despite minimizing pre‐analytical variability. Utilization of only one method or too few replicates (both method and technical) may limit the subset of proteomic information obtained.     

褐飞虱不同致害性种群体内共生菌18S rDNA部分序列比较

分离纯化了褐飞虱3种不同致害性种群体内类酵母共生菌 (yeast-like symbionts, YLS),并对其18S rDNA基因序列进行了比较。结果表明,褐飞虱3种不同致害性种群体内类酵母共生菌18S rDNA均扩增出600 bp左右的片断。依据获得的18S rDNA特异性序列,结合已知真菌的18S rDNA部分序列,构建了不同宿主的YLS分子系统树。结果显示, 褐飞虱3种不同致害性种群体内的YLS同属子囊菌亚门（Ascomycotina）的核菌纲（Pyrenomycetes）,并与此纲中的Hypomyces chrysospermus亲缘关系相对最近。