Formation and morphology of dark puffs in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes

The formation of unusual dark puffs in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes has been studied by electron microscopic (EM) analysis. Fly stocks transformed by the P[ry; Prat:bw] and P[hs-BRC-z1] constructs were used. In the former the bw gene is under the promoter of a housekeeping gene, Prat; in the latter the Br-C locus, mapping to the dark puff 2B, is under the promoter of a heat-shock gene, hsp70. Inserted into region 65A of the 3L chromosome, the Prat:bw copies give rise to structures which are morphologically reminiscent of the so-called "dark" puffs. In contrast, insertion of P[hs-BRC-z1] into region 99B of the 3R chromosome causes a regular "light" puff of form. Comparative analysis of the dark puffs--both transgenic and natural--suggests that there might be at least two mechanisms underlying their formation. One is a local incomplete decondensation of activated bands, characteristic of the so-called small puffs. The other is the formation of ectopic-looking contacts between the bands adjacent to the puffing zone. Transposition of the DNA, from which such a puff develops, causes a regular light puff to form at the new location. Heterochromatic regions do not appear to be directly involved in puffing.     

Expression Pattern Diversity and Functional Conservation Between Retroposed PRAT Genes from Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis

Gene duplication by retrotransposition duplicates only the coding and untranslated regions of a gene and, thus, biases retroduplicated genes toward having different expression patterns from their parental genes. As such, genes duplicated by retrotransposition are more likely to develop novel expression domains. To explore this idea further, we used the Prat/Prat2 gene duplication in Drosophila as a case study to examine the aftermath of a retrotransposition event that resulted in both the parent and the child gene becoming essential for survival. We used the Gal4-UAS transgene system with EGFP as a reporter to determine the developmental expression patterns of Prat and Prat2 from D. melanogaster (DmPrat and DmPrat2) and Prat from D. virilis (DvPrat). We also tested the functional equivalence of the protein products of DmPrat and DmPrat2. We found that each of the proteins could rescue DmPrat mutations, showing that the requirement for both Prat and Prat2 in Drosophila is not simply due to differences in protein function. In contrast, we found that the DmPrat and DmPrat2 genes have developed nonoverlapping patterns of expression, which correlate with their respective loss-of-function phenotypes. We further found that DvPrat expression is similar to DmPrat during development but differs in adult gonads. Thus, the function of the Prat retrogene has not diverged in the D. melanogaster and D. virilis lineages, while some aspects of its expression pattern have evolved. Finally, we have identified promoter elements, conserved upstream of DmPrat and DvPrat, that this retrogene has acquired to drive its expression.     

Modeling dark puffs using P-transposons in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes

Modeling of morphologically unusual "dark" puffs was conducted using Drosophila melanogaster strains transformed by construct P[ry; Prat:bw], in which gene brown is controlled by the promoter of the housekeeping gene Prat. In polytene chromosomes, insertions of this type were shown to form structures that are morphologically similar to small puffs. By contrast, the Broad-Complex (Br-C) locus, which normally produce a dark puff in the 2B region of the X chromosome, forms a typical light-colored puffs when transferred to the 99B region of chromosome 3R using P[hs-BRC-z1]. A comparison of transposon-induced puffs with those appearing during normal development indicates that these puff types are formed via two different mechanisms. One mechanism involves decompaction of weakly transcribed bands and is characteristic of small puffs. The other mechanism is associated with contacts between bands adjacent to the puffing zone, which leads to mixing of inactive condensed and actively transcribed decondensed material and forming of large dark puffs.     

Duplications That Suppress and Deletions That Restore Expression from a Chalcone Synthase Multigene Family

Seed coat color in soybean is determined by four alleles of the classically defined / (inhibitor) locus that controls the presence or absence as well as the spatial distribution of anthocyanin pigments in the seed coat. By analyzing spontaneous mutations of the / locus, we demonstrated that the / locus is a region of chalcone synthase (CHS) gene duplications. Paradoxically, deletions of CHS gene sequences allow higher levels of CHS mRNAs and restore pigmentation to the seed coat. The unusual nature of the / locus suggests that its dominant alleles may represent naturally occurring examples of homology-dependent gene silencing and that the spontaneous deletions erase the gene-silencing phenomena. Specifically, mutations from the dominant ii allele (yellow seed coats with pigmented hila) to the recessive i allele (fully pigmented) can be associated with the absence of a 2.3-kb Hindlll fragment that carries CHS4, a member of the multigene CHS family. Seven independent mutations exhibit deletions in the CHS4 promoter region. The dominant / allele (yellow seed coats) exhibits an extra 12.1-kb Hindlll fragment that hybridizes with both the CHS coding region and CHS1 promoter-specific probes. Mutations of the dominant / allele to the recessive i allele (pigmented seed coats) give rise to 10.4- or 9.6-kb Hindlll CHS fragments that have lost the duplicated CHS1 promoter. Finally, gene expression analysis demonstrated that heterozygous plants (I/i) with yellow seed coats have reduced mRNA levels, indicating that the 12.1-kb Hindlll CHS fragment associated with the dominant / allele inhibits pigmentation in a trans-dominant manner. Moreover, CHS gene-specific expression in seed coats shows that multiple CHS genes are expressed in seed coats.     

Modeling of Dark Puffs Using P Transposons in Polytene Chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster

Modeling of morphologically unusual dark puffs was conducted using Drosophila melanogaster strains transformed by construct P[ry; Prat:bw], in which gene brown is controlled by the promoter of the housekeeping gene Prat. In polytene chromosomes, insertions of this type were shown to form structures that are morphologically similar to small puffs. By contrast, the Broad-Complex (Br-C) locus, which normally produce a dark puff in the 2B region of the X chromosome, forms a typical light-colored puff when transferred to the 99B region of chromosome 3R using P[hs-BRC-z1]. A comparison of transposon-induced puffs with those appearing during normal development indicates that these puff types are formed via two different mechanisms. One mechanism involves decompaction of weakly transcribed bands and is characteristic of small puffs. The other mechanism is associated with contacts between bands adjacent to the puffing zone, which leads to mixing of inactive condensed and actively transcribed decondensed material and forming of large dark puffs.     

Molecular and Genetic Analyses of Drosophila Prat, Which Encodes the First Enzyme of De Novo Purine Biosynthesis

The Drosophila Prat gene encodes phosphoribosylamidotransferase (PRAT), the enzyme that performs the first committed step of the de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis pathway. Using information from amino acid sequence alignments of PRAT from other organisms, a polymerase chain reaction-based approach was employed to clone Prat. Amino acid sequence alignment of Drosophila PRAT with PRAT from bacteria, yeast, and vertebrates indicates that it is most identical (at least 60%) to the vertebrate PRATs. It shares putative amino-terminal propeptide and ironbinding domains seen only in Bacillus subtilis and vertebrate PRATs. Prat was localized to the right arm of chromosome 3 at polytene band 84E1-2. Owing to the fact that this region had been well characterized previously, Prat was localized to a 30-kilobase region between two deficiency break-points. By making the prediction that Prat would have a similar ``purine syndrome' phenotype as mutations in the genes ade2 and ade3, which encode enzymes downstream in the pathway, five alleles of Prat were isolated. Three of the alleles were identified as missense mutations. A comparison of PRAT enzyme activity with phenotype in three of the mutants indicates that a reduction to 40% of the wild-type allele's activity is sufficient to cause the purine syndrome, suggesting that PRAT activity is limiting in Drosophila.