Optical studies of complexes of quinacrine with DNA and chromatin: implications for the fluorescence of cytological chromosome preparations

The fluorescence and circular dichroism of quinacrine complexed with nucleic acids and chromatin were measured to estimate the relative magnitudes of factors influencing the fluorescence banding patterns of chromosomes stained with quinacrine or quinacrine mustard. DNA base composition can influence quinacrine fluorescence in at least two ways. The major effect, evident at low ratios of quinacrine to DNA, is a quenching of dye fluorescence, correlating with G-C composition. This may occur largely prior to relaxation of excited dye molecules. At higher dye/DNA saturations, which might exist in cytological chromosome preparations stained with high concentrations of quinacrine, energy transfer between dye molecules converts dyes bound near G-C base pairs into energy sinks. In contrast to its influence on quinacrine fluorescence, DNA base composition has very little effect on either quinacrine binding affinity or the circular dichroism of bound quinacrine molecules. The synthetic polynucleotides poly(dA-dT) and poly(dA)-poly(dT) have a similar effect on quinacrine fluorescence, but differ markedly in their affinity for quinacrine and in the circular dichroism changes associated with quinacrine binding. Quinacrine fluorescence intensity and lifetime are slightly less when bound to calf thymus chromatin than when bound to calf thymus DNA, and minor differences in circular dichroism between these complexes are observed. Chromosomal proteins probably affect the fluorescence of chromosomes stained with quinacrine, although this effect appears to be much less than that due to variations in DNA base composition. The fluorescence of cytological chromosome preparations may also be influenced by fixation effects and macroscopic variations in chromosome coiling.     

The distribution of quinacrine on chromosomes as determined by X-ray microanalysis

The distribution of quinacrine and protein sulphur has been compared with that of DNA in euchromatic and heterochromatic regions of mouse chromosomes stained with the fluorescent dye quinacrine, using X-ray microanalysis. Heterochromatin tends to bind relatively more quinacrine than euchromatin, and contains a greater concentration of sulphur. Measurements of quinacrine fluorescence, when compared with quinacrine binding, show that the excitation of fluorescence is more efficient when the dye is bound to euchromatin than when it is bound to heterochromatin. Although this observation is consistent with the hypothesis that the dull quinacrine fluorescence of mouse centromeres is due to quenching by guanine residues, two other factors should also be considered: the lower absolute amount of dye bound to the centromeres, and a concentration-dependent quenching of fluorescence.     

The action of ionizing radiation on DNA in the presence of quinacrine

Strand breakage of DNA irradiated in solution and in the dry state in the presence of quinacrine was investigated by sedimentation analysis. Determination of single strand breaks in solution combined with binding studies permits to conclude that bound quinacrine protects DNA more effectively than the free compound. In the dry state quinacrine is without detectable effect on both single and double strand break formation, neither under aerobic nor anaerobic conditions.     

Incorporation and replication of foreign metaphase chromosomes in cultured mammalian cells

It is shown that the dyes used to produce banding patterns on chromosomes, quinacrine and Giemsa, are bound to DNA, and not to non-histone protein, the other chromosomal component remaining after acetic acid fixation. Studies on fixed nuclei and on extracted DNA in gelatine films show that the amount of dye bound is not affected by whether the DNA is native or denatured, and is not directly related to the amount of DNA present. Quinacrine is bound to the DNA ionically. With Giemsa, a new magenta compound is formed in situ, consisting of two molecules of methylene blue and one of eosin; this compound is attached to the chromosome by hydrogen bonds. Both quinacrine and the magenta compound formed from Giemsa appear to be attached to DNA molecules at two separate points, and the available evidence suggests that the amount of dye bound is related to the concentration of the DNA. It is suggested that the dye molecules bridge longitudinally separated sites brought into close proximity by folding of the DNA, and that the spatial arrangement of sites in the chromosome is influenced by non-histone proteins. It is concluded that chromosome banding is thus a consequence of the reduction of dye binding in those regions where the DNA chains become sufficiently dispersed to prevent bridging by the dye molecules. Possible indirect effects of base composition and repetition on dye binding at certain chromosomal sites are discussed.     

Comparative microcalorimetric and dilatometric analysis of the interactions of quinacrine,chloroquine, and ethidium bromide with DNA

The enthalpies of binding of chloroquine and quinacrine to DNA at different molar ratios of drug to DNA and at different ionic strengths have been measured. The limiting values obtained with quinacrine fall in the range found for typical intercalating agents (e.g., ethidium, proflavin, adriamycin), whereas the value obtained with chloroquine is always zero, independent of the ratio of drug to DNA and ionic strength. The dilatometric measurements performed on the same systems and on the ethidium–DNA system show that when ethidium and quinacrine bind to DNA at low drug/DNA ratios, a volume decrease of about 16 mL/mol of bound drug occurs. No change in volume is observed when the two drugs bind to DNA through external, electrostatic forces. The volume change can be attributed to the loss of structured water around hydrophobic moieties of the drug molecules, following intercalation. In contrast, chloroquine binding to DNA at low drug/DNA ratios is characterized by a volume change distinctly smaller than that shown by quinacrine. The low ΔV_B and ΔH_B values shown by chloroquine are discussed in terms of the mechanism of interaction with DNA.     

Mechanisms of chromosome banding. V. Quinacrine banding.

A series of biochemical investigations were undertaken to determine the mechanism of Q-banding. The results were as follows: 1. In agreement with previous studies, highly AT-rich DNA, such as poly(dA)-poly(dT), markedly enhanced quinacrine fluorescence while GC containing DNA quenched fluorescence. These effects persisted at DNA concentrations comparable to those in the metaphase chromosome. 2. Studies of quinacrine-DNA complexes in regard to the hypochromism of quanacrine, DNA Tm, DNA viscosity, and equilibrium dialysis, indicated the quinacrine was bound be intercalation with relatively little sid binding. 3. Single or double stranded nucleotide polymers, in the form of complete or partial helices, were 1000-fold more effective in quenching than solutions of single nucleotides, suggesting that base stacking is required for quenching. 4. Studies of polymers in the A conformation, such as transfer RNA and DNA-RNA hybrids, indicated that marked base tilting does not affect the ability of nuclei acids to cause quenching or enhancement of quinacrine fluorescence. 5. Salts inhibit the binding of quinacrine to DNA. 6. Spermine, polylysine and polyarginine, which bind in the small groove of DNA, inhibited quinacrine binding and quenching, while histones, which probably bind in the large groove, had little effect. This correlated with the observation that removal of histones with acid has no effect on Q-banding. 7. Mouse liver chromatin was separated into five fractions. At concentrations of quinacrine from 2 times 10-6 to 2 times 10-5 M all fractions inhibited to varying degrees the ability of the chromatin DNA to bind quinacrine and quench quinacrine fluorescence. At saturating levels of quinacrine two fractions, the 400 g pellet (rich in heterochromatin) and a dispersed euchromatin supernatant fraction, showed a decreased number of binding sites for quinacrine. These two fractions were also the richest in non-histone proteins. 8. DNA isolated from the different fractions all showed identical quenching of quinacrine fluorescenc. 9. Mouse GC-rich, mid-band, AT-rich, and satellite DNA, isolated by CsCL AND Cs-2SO-4-Ag+ centrifugation all showed identical quenching of quinacrine fluorescence, indicating that within a given organism, except for very AT or GC-rich satellites, the variation in base composition is not adequate to explain Q-banding.We interpret these results to indicate that: (a) quinacrine binds to chromatin by intercalation of the three planar rings with the large group at position 9 lying in the small groove of DNA, (b) most pale staining regions are due to a decrease binding of quinacrine, and (c) this inhibition of binding is predominately due to non-histone proteins.     

Mechanisms of chromosome banding

A series of biochemical investigations were undertaken to determine the mechanism of Q-banding. The results were as follows: 1. In agreement with previous studies, highly AT-rich DNA, such as poly(dA)-poly(dT), markedly enhanced quinacrine fluorescence while GC containing DNA quenched fluorescence. These effects persisted at DNA concentrations comparable to those in the metaphase chromosome. 2. Studies of quinacrine-DNA complexes in regard to the hypochromism of quinacrine, DNA Tm, DNA viscosity, and equilibrium dialysis, indicated the quinacrine was bound by intercalation with relatively little side binding. 3. Single or double stranded nucleotide polymers, in the form of complete or partial helices, were 1000-fold more effective in quenching than solutions of single nucleotides, suggesting that base stacking is required for quenching. 4. Studies of polymers in the A conformation, such as transfer RNA and DNA-RNA hybrids, indicated that marked base tilting does not affect the ability of nucleic acids to cause quenching or enhancement of quinacrine fluorescence. 5. Salts inhibit the binding of quinacrine to DNA. 6. Spermine, polylysine and polyarginine, which bind in the small groove of DNA, inhibited quinacrine binding and quenching, while histones, which probably bind in the large groove, had little effect. This correlated with the observation that removal of histones with acid has no effect on Q-banding. 7. Mouse liver chromatin was separated into five fractions. At concentrations of quinacrine from 2×10^?6 to 2×10^?5 M all fractions inhibited to varying degrees the ability of the chromatin DNA to bind quinacrine and quench quinacrine fluorescence. At saturating levels of quinacrine two fractions, the 400 g pellet (rich in heterochromatin) and a dispersed euchromatin supernatant fraction, showed a decreased number of binding sites for quinacrine. These two fractions were also the richest in non-histone proteins. 8. DNA isolated from the different fractions all showed identical quenching of quinacrine fluorescence. 9. Mouse GC-rich, mid-band, AT-rich, and satellite DNA, isolated by CsCl and Cs₂SO₄-Ag⁺ centrifugation all showed identical quenching of quinacrine fluorescence, indicating that within a given organism, except for very AT or GC-rich satellites, the variation in base composition is not adequate to explain Q-banding. — We interpret these results to indicate that: (a) quinacrine binds to chromatin by intercalation of the three planar rings with the large group at position 9 lying in the small groove of DNA, (b) most pale staining regions are due to a decrease binding of quinacrine, and (c) this inhibition of binding is predominately due to non-histone proteins.     

Quinacrine: Spectroscopic properties and interactions with polynucleotides

The acridine dye quinacrine and its interactions with calf thymus DNA, poly(dA-dT) · poly (dA-dT), and poly (dG-dC) · poly(dG-dC) were studied by light absorption, linear dichroism, and fluorescence spectroscopy. The transition moments of quinacrine give rise to absorption bands polarized along the short axis (400–480-nm band), and the long axis (345-nm and 290-nm bands) of the molecule, respectively. Linear dichroism studies show that quinacrine intercalates into calf thymus DNA as well as into the polynucleotides, displaying fairly homogeneous binding to poly (dA-dT) · poly (dA-dT), but more than one type of intercalation site for calf thymus DNA and poly (dG-dC) · poly(dG-dC). Fluorescence spectroscopy shows that for free quinacrine the pK = 8.1 between the mono- and diprotonated states also remains unchanged in the excited state. Quinacrine bound to calf thymus DNA and polynucleotides exhibits light absorption typical for the intercalated diprotonated form. The fluorescence enhancement of quinacrine bound to poly (dA-dT) · poly(dA-dT) may be due to shielding from water interactions involving transient H-bond formation. The fluorescence quenching in poly(dG-dC) · poly(dG-dC) may be due to excited state electron transfer from guanine to quinacrine. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Fluorescence-determined preferential binding of quinacrine to DNA.

Quinacrine complexes with native DNA (Calf thymus, Micrococcus lysodeikticus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Colstridium perfringens) and synthetic polynucleotides (poly(dA) . poly(dT), poly[d(A-T)] . poly[d(A-T)], poly(dG) . poly(dC) and poly[d(G-C)] . poly[d(G-C)]) has been investigated in solution at 0.1 M NaCl, 0.05 M Tris HCl, 0.001 M EDTA, pH 7.5, at 20 degrees C. Fluorescence excitation spectra of complexes with dye concentration D = 5-30 microM and DNA phosphate concentration P = 400 microM have been examined from 300 to 500 nm, while collecting the emission above 520 nm. The amounts of free and bound quinacrine in the dye-DNA complexes have been determined by means of equilibrium dialysis experiments. Different affinities have been found for the various DNAs and their values have been examined with a model that assumes that the binding constants associated with alternating purine and pyrimidine sequences are larger than those relative to nonalternating ones. Among the alternating nearest neighbor base sequences, the Pyr(3'-5')Pur sequences, i.e., C-G, T-G, C-A and T-A seem to bind quinacrine stronger than the remaining sequences. In particular the three sites, where a G . C base pair is involved, are found to display higher affinities. Good agreement is found with recent calculations on the energetics of intercalation sites in DNA. The analysis of the equilibrium shows also that the strength of the excitation spectrum of bound dye depends strongly upon the ratio of bound quinacrine to DNA. This effect can be attributed to dye-dye energy transfer along DNA.     

The distribution of quinacrine on chromosomes as determined by X-ray microanalysis

The distribution of quinacrine in relation to Q-banding on CHO chromosomes has been investigated using X-ray microanalysis. Technical problems involved in this type of experiment were studied in detail. It was necessary to use a solution of quinacrine acetate in acetic acid to ensure that the only chlorine detectable in quinacrine-stained chromosomes was in the quinacrine molecule. Electron irradiation during analysis rapidly destroys quinacrine fluorescence, but the chlorine is not lost from the chromosomes, and there are several reasons for supposing that a reliable distribution of quinacrine on the chromosome can be obtained by the method. — Small variations along the chromosome in the amounts of chlorine (representing quinacrine) and of phosphorus (mainly DNA) occur. The distribution patterns for chlorine and phosphorus show a good resemblance to each other for each homologous chromosome; quinacrine fluorescence patterns (Q-bands) do not resemble chlorine distribution patterns, however. The results of this study therefore support the view that Q-bands result from the differential quenching of fluorescence along chromosomes to which the quinacrine is essentially uniformly bound, and do not reflect differential binding of quinacrine along the chromosome.With an Appendix by A. D. Carothers and D. Rutovitz     

Suppression of quinacrine banding of human chromosomes by mounting in organic media

When Q-banded human chromosomes mounted in water are transferred to an organic mounting medium, the chromosomes show uniform bright quinacrine fluorescence. This change is reversible. It is inferred that quinacrine is bound uniformly along the chromosomes, and that Q-banding is a consequence of a non-uniform distribution along the chromosomes of chemical groups, probably proteinaceous, which affect the fluorescence efficiency of the bound quinacrine.     

Mechanisms of quinacrine binding and fluorescence in nuclei and chromosomes

The mechanisms has been investigated whereby quinacrine binds to the DNA of nuclei and chromosomes in cytological preparations fixed in methanol-acetic acid. A variety of evidence is consistent with the idea that the quinacrine binds by intercalation. This is supported by a high value for the affinity of quinacrine for DNA, together with a saturation value of 0.2 quinacrine molecules/nucleotide; binding in the presence of strong salt solutions; and inhibition of fluorescence and banding by denaturation or depurination of DNA. At high quinacrine concentrations, weak binding of quinacrine to nuclei and chromosomes also occurs, but this is not relevant to the production of strong fluorescence or Q-banding patterns. A number of factors were tested which might have affected quinacrine fluorescence and banding. These included: pH; blocking protein amino groups by acetylation or benzoylation; introduction of hydrophobic groups by benzoylation; and dephosphorylation. All these treatments were without effect. However, comparison of the quinacrine fluorescence of human and onion nuclei, which differ substantially in the base composition of their DNA, shows that quinacrine fluorescence can be enhanced in cytological preparations by AT-rich DNA.     

Fluorescence analysis of G·C versus A·T binding of quinacrine to DNA

The affinity of quinacrine for native DNA has been determined from fluorescence measurements and equilibrium dialysis in Tris-HC10.05 m, NaCl0.1 m, EDTA 10^?3m, pH 7.5. When considering M. lysodeiktikus, E. coli calf thymus and C. perfringens the affinities of DNA for quaniactive have been found to change by a factor of two and the fluorescence intensities to change by a factor of 25. The varying affinities and fluoroescence intensities of bound quinacrine are attributed to heterogeneous binding. For all DNAs we have assumed that there exist three classes of intercalation sites: I, A·T-A·T; 2, G·C-G·C; and 3, A·T-G·C, assuming that base pair ordering is less relevant than base composition of sites. By fitting the affinities of native DNAs with this model it was found that quinacrine binds to site 2 three times more strongly than it does to site 1. When flucrescence intensity is studied, triplets of A·T pairs appear to be responsible for the high quantum yield of A·T rich DNA whereas the quenching properties of a G·C base pair adjacent to an intercalated quinacrine are well known.     

Mechanisms of quinacrine binding and fluorescence in nuclei and chromosomes

Summary The mechanism has been investigated whereby quinacrine binds to the DNA of nuclei and chromosomes in cytological preparations fixed in methanol-acetic acid. A variety of evidence is consistent with the idea that the quinacrine binds by intercalation. This is supported by a high value for the affinity of quinacrine for DNA, together with a saturation value of 0.2 quinacrine molecules/nucleotide; binding in the presence of strong salt solutions; and inhibition of fluorescence and banding by denaturation or depurination of DNA. At high quinacrine concentrations, weak binding of quinacrine to nuclei and chromosomes also occurs, but this is not relevant to the production of strong fluorescence or Q-banding patterns.A number of factors were tested which might have affected quinacrine fluorescence and banding. These included: pH; blocking protein amino groups by acetylation or benzoylation; introduction of hydrophobic groups by benzoylation; and dephosphorylation. All these treatments were without effect. However, comparison of the quinacrine fluorescence of human and onion nuclei, which differ substantially in the base composition of their DNa, shows that quinacrine fluorescence can be enhanced in cytological preparations by AT-rich DNA.In honour of Prof. P. van Duijn     

Energy-linked protonation of quinacrine in beef heart submitochondrial membranes.

1. The absorption spectrum of quinacrine in aqueous solution, in the visible region, changes with the pH of the medium in the pH range from 6.0 to 9.0 with an isosbestic point at 353 nm. This indicates that the monoprotonated (quinacrine - H+) and the diprotonated (quinacrine - 2H+) forms of quinacrine at equilibrium in this pH range have a 1 to 1 stoichiometry. 2. The monoprotonated and the dipronated forms to quinacrine exhibit similar fluorescence emission spectra, but distinctive fluorescence excitation spectra. 3. The relative fluorescence quantum yields of quinacrine in aqueous media of various pH values are estimated. The relative fluorescence quantum yield of quinacrine at pH 9.0 is more than 3 fold of that at pH 6.0. 4. The fluorescence excitation and emission spectra, as well as the relative fluorescence quantum yield of quinacrine associated with non-energized submitochondrial membranes, are similar to those of quinacrine alone. 5. Analyses of the absorption spectra, the fluorescence excitation spectra and the relative fluorescence quantum yield indicate that the energy-linked fluorescence decrease of quinacrine associated with the energized submitochondrial membranes results from the protonation of quinacrine - H+ to form quinacrine - 2H+. 6. Quantitative data are provided indicating that the maximal efficiency of protonation of quinacrine - H+ to form quinacrine - 2H+ depends on the concentration of H+ in the membranes generated through energy coupling, and the concentration of quinacrine - H+ initially present in the reaction medium. Under optimal conditions virtually complete conversion of quinacrine - H+ into quinacrine - 2H+ is observed. 7. The fluorescence intensity of quinacrine, either alone or associated with non-energized submitochondrial membranes, decreases with increasing temperature. When quinacrine is associated with the energized membranes, however, its fluorescence intensity increases slightly with increasing temperature. This unusual fluorescence behavior towards temperature, together with the fact that under optimal conditions virtually all the quinacrine molecules associated with the energized membranes are in the diprotonated form, further substantiate our earlier conclusion that the diprotonated quinacrine molecules are tightly bound to the energized membranes in a fashion which does not permit ready equilibration with the external medium.     

Quinacrine inhibits the calcium-induced calcium release in heavy sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles

Quinacrine is a fluorescence probe useful for studying the effect of local anesthetics. The interaction of quinacrine and sarcoplasmic reticulum membranes measured by fluorescence spectroscopy indicates the presence of a saturable binding site. Typical local anesthetics are able to displace quinacrine bound to heavy sarcoplasmic reticulum membranes. The effectiveness of that displacement decreases in the order dibucaine greater than tetracaine greater than benzocaine greater than lidocaine greater than procaine greater than procainamide, indicating that the size and hydrophobicity of quinacrine are major determinants in the binding process. The use of radioactive tracer and a rapid filtration technique reveals that quinacrine interacts, at lower concentrations, with sarcoplasmic reticulum membranes by blocking the Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release. Higher quinacrine concentrations also affect the Ca2+-pump activity.     

Interaction of quinacrine mustard with mononucleotides and polynucleotides

1. The interaction between quinacrine mustard and mononucleotides and polynucleotides was investigated by fluorimetry and absorbance spectrophotometry. 2. The fluorescence spectrum of quinacrine mustard is independent of the ionic strength and pH. The dependence of the quinacrine mustard fluorescence intensity on ionic strength, pH and anions is described. 3. The fluorescence intensity of quinacrine mustard was enhanced with the mononucleotide adenylic acid and polynucleotides such as poly(rA), poly(rU) and poly(rA,rU). 4. Quenching of the fluorescence intensity of quinacrine mustard occurred with the mononucleotide guanylic acid and with poly(rG) and poly(rC,rG). 5. The mononucleotide cytidylic acid or poly(rC) showed no effect on the fluorescence intensity of quinacrine mustard. 6. The interaction between the dye and native DNA species was also dependent on the presence of base-specific binding sites in the DNA. The higher the (G+C) content was in the native DNA tested the higher was the quenching effect on the fluorescence intensity of quinacrine mustard. 7. No interaction was found between the dye and methylated DNA. The binding between quinacrine mustard and apurinic DNA was confirmed to be in the phosphate groups of the purines.     

Comparative viscometric analysis of the interaction of chloroquine and quinacrine with superhelical and sonicated DNA.

Unwinding angles for the structurally related antimalarial drugs chloroquine and quinacrine have been determined with superhelical Col E1 plasmid DNA by applying the quantitative method developed by Vinograd and co-workers (Revet, B.M., Schmir, M. and Vinograd, J. (1971) Nat. New Biol. 229, 10). The value for chloroquine, 8.6 degrees, calculated assuming an unwinding angle of 26 degrees for ethidium bromide, is significantly lower than the value for quinacrine, 22.5 degrees, calculated in the same manner. Viscometric titrations with sonicated calf thymus DNA were quantitated using available binding constants for the two drugs and indicated that chloroquine also causes significantly smaller DNA length increases on intercalation relative to quinacrine. The conclusion from these experiments is that chloroquine does not bind to DNA by the classical intercalation mechanism typical of quinacrine and ethidium.     

Interaction of actinomycin D, ethidium, quinacrine, daunorubicin, and tetralysine with DNA: 31P NMR chemical shift and relaxation investigation.

The binding of actinomycin D, ethidium, quinacrine, daunorubicin, and tetralysine to DNA has been investigated using 31P NMR. Titration of DNA with actinomycin yields a new downfield peak or overlapping peaks as would be expected from the slow dissociation kinetics of this compound. The other intercalators shift the DNA 31P signal downfield as a single exchange averaged peak. Tetralysine causes a slight upfield shift. The chemical shift titration curves for the intercalators are sigmoid curves suggesting that cooperative processes or competing effects on the chemical shift are being observed. The magnitude of the chemical shift change at saturation of DNA with the compounds is found to vary significantly and to be linearly related to the DNA base pair unwinding angle for the compounds. Analysis of 31P spin lattice relaxation times (T1) and linewidths as a function of temperature (below Tm) and titration with the above compounds indicates that T1 does not change significantly while linewidth increases with decreasing temperature and increasing bound intercalator. One interpretation of these results is that in both cases the overall motion of DNA becomes slower while the internal motion is not greatly affected.     

Effects of quinacrine on endothelial cell morphology and transcription factor-DNA interactions

Quinacrine has been used for decades and the beneficial effects of this drug are as numerous as its toxic effects. Since endothelial cells (EC) are in many cases the first cells coming in contact with drugs, the effect of quinacrine on certain aspects of EC biology were studied. The presented data demonstrate that quinacrine can have a marked impact on the integrity on EC monolayer without grossly interfering with cell viability. The described impact of quinacrine on EC might explain, at least in part, the toxic effects of this drug observed in the past. Furthermore, quinacrine profoundly effects gene regulation in EC. Quinacrine binds to DNA in a sequence-specific manner. While NF-kappa B-DNA interactions are not effected, AP-1-DNA binding is blocked by quinacrine. Such differential effects are presumably due to intercalation of quinacrine into the AP-1 consensus element. Preincubation of oligonucleotides resembling this sequence blocked the subsequent binding of nuclear extract containing AP-1 protein(s). Taken together, these data suggest that quinacrine interferes with EC physiology and alters the repertoire of EC to respond to stimuli. Furthermore, the differential effects of quinacrine might be exploited to study and gain additional insight in the involvement of AP-1 and NF-kappa B in gene regulation.