Assembly of the 5' and 3' minor domains of 16S ribosomal RNA as monitored by tethered probing from ribosomal protein S20

The ribosomal protein (r-protein) S20 is a primary binding protein. As such, it interacts directly and independently with the 5′ domain as well as the 3′ minor domain of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in minimal particles and the fully assembled 30S subunit. The interactions observed between r-protein S20 and the 5′ domain of 16S rRNA are quite extensive, while those between r-protein S20 and the 3′ minor domain are significantly more limited. In this study, directed hydroxyl radical probing mediated by Fe(II)-derivatized S20 proteins was used to monitor the folding of 16S rRNA during r-protein association and 30S subunit assembly. An analysis of the cleavage patterns in the minimal complexes [16S rRNA and Fe(II)-S20] and the fully assembled 30S subunit containing the same Fe(II)-derivatized proteins shows intriguing similarities and differences. These results suggest that the two domains, 5′ and 3′ minor, are organized relative to S20 at different stages of assembly. The 5′ domain acquires, in a less complex ribonucleoprotein particle than the 3′ minor domain, the same architecture as observed in mature subunits. These results are similar to what would be predicted of subunit assembly by the 5′-to-3′ direction assembly model.     

Protein S20 Binds Two 16S rRNA Sites as Assembly Is Initiated

Ribosomal protein S20 is a primary binding protein that bridges the 5′ domain and the 3′ minor domain of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in the 30S ribosomal subunit. Using time-dependent dimethyl sulfate modification, we have determined that as it is bound to 16S rRNA, protein S20 causes rapid protection of bases A246, A274, A279, and A282 in the stem region of helix 11 in the 5′ domain and moderately fast modifications of helix 44 bases A1433 and A1434 in the 3′ minor domain. At a later time, enhancements occur with bases A181and A190 in helix 9, bases A325 and A327 in helix 13, and base C264 at the distal end of helix 11 in the 5′ domain of 16S rRNA. The modifications that occur in the stem region of helix 11 are distant from the binding site of protein S20, as determined from the crystal structure. Simultaneous addition of protein S17 with S20 to the complex significantly alters the modifications caused by protein S20 in the stem region of helix 11 but does not alter the remaining modifications. Our results indicate that protein S20 is binding to at least two alternate 16S rRNA sites during the early assembly process.     

Differential effects of ribosomal proteins and Mg2+ ions on a conformational switch during 30S ribosome 5′-domain assembly

Ribosomal protein S4 nucleates assembly of the 30S ribosome 5′ and central domains, which is crucial for the survival of cells. Protein S4 changes the structure of its 16S rRNA binding site, passing through a non-native intermediate complex before forming native S4-rRNA contacts. Ensemble FRET was used to measure the thermodynamic stability of non-native and native S4 complexes in the presence of Mg²⁺ ions and other 5′-domain proteins. Equilibrium titrations of Cy3-labeled 5′-domain RNA with Cy5-labeled protein S4 showed that Mg²⁺ ions preferentially stabilize the native S4-rRNA complex. In contrast, ribosomal proteins S20 and S16 act by destabilizing the non-native S4-rRNA complex. The full cooperative switch to the native complex requires S4, S16, and S20 and is achieved to a lesser degree by S4 and S16. The resulting thermodynamic model for assembly of the 30S body illustrates how ribosomal proteins selectively bias the equilibrium between alternative rRNA conformations, increasing the cooperativity of rRNA folding beyond what can be achieved by Mg²⁺ ions alone.     

Specific contacts between protein S4 and ribosomal RNA are required at multiple stages of ribosome assembly

Assembly of bacterial 30S ribosomal subunits requires structural rearrangements to both its 16S rRNA and ribosomal protein components. Ribosomal protein S4 nucleates 30S assembly and associates rapidly with the 5′ domain of the 16S rRNA. In vitro, transformation of initial S4–rRNA complexes to long-lived, mature complexes involves refolding of 16S helix 18, which forms part of the decoding center. Here we use targeted mutagenesis of Geobacillus stearothermophilus S4 to show that remodeling of S4–rRNA complexes is perturbed by ram alleles associated with reduced translational accuracy. Gel mobility shift assays, SHAPE chemical probing, and in vivo complementation show that the S4 N-terminal extension is required for RNA binding and viability. Alanine substitutions in Y47 and L51 that interact with 16S helix 18 decrease S4 affinity and destabilize the helix 18 pseudoknot. These changes to the protein–RNA interface correlate with no growth (L51A) or cold-sensitive growth, 30S assembly defects, and accumulation of 17S pre-rRNA (Y47A). A third mutation, R200A, over-stabilizes the helix 18 pseudoknot yet results in temperature-sensitive growth, indicating that complex stability is finely tuned by natural selection. Our results show that early S4–RNA interactions guide rRNA folding and impact late steps of 30S assembly.     

Slow formation of stable complexes during coincubation of minimal rRNA and ribosomal protein S4

Ribosomal protein S4 binds and stabilizes a five-helix junction or five-way junction (5WJ) in the 5′ domain of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and is one of two proteins responsible for nucleating 30S ribosome assembly. Upon binding, both protein S4 and 5WJ reorganize their structures. We show that labile S4 complexes rearrange into stable complexes within a few minutes at 42 °C, with longer coincubation leading to an increased population of stable complexes. In contrast, prefolding the rRNA has a smaller effect on stable S4 binding. Experiments with minimal rRNA fragments show that this structural change depends only on 16S residues within the S4 binding site. SHAPE (selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension) chemical probing experiments showed that S4 strongly stabilizes 5WJ and the helix (H) 18 pseudoknot, which become tightly folded within the first minute of S4 binding. However, a kink in H16 that makes specific contacts with the S4 N-terminal extension, as well as a right-angle motif between H3, H4, and H18, requires a minute or more to become fully structured. Surprisingly, S4 structurally reorganizes the 530-loop and increases the flexibility of H3, which is proposed to undergo a conformational switch during 30S assembly. These elements of the S4 binding site may require other 30S proteins to reach a stable conformation.     

Interaction of proteins S16, S17 and S20 with 16 S ribosomal RNA

We have used rapid chemical probing methods to examine the effect of assembly of ribosomal proteins S16, S17 and S20 on the reactivity of individual residues of 16 S rRNA. Protein S17 strongly protects a compact region of the RNA between positions 245 and 281, a site previously assigned to binding of S20. Protein S20 also protects many of these same positions, albeit more weakly than S17. Strong S20-dependent protections are seen elsewhere in the 5' domain, most notably at positions 108, and in the 160-200 and 330 loop regions. Enenpectedly, S20 also causes protection of several bases in the 1430-1450 region, in the 3' minor domain. In the presence of the primary binding proteins S4, S8 and S20, we observe a variety of effects that result from assembly of the secondary binding protein S16. Most strongly protected are nucleotides around positions 50, 120, 300 to 330 and 360 in the 5' domain, and positions 606 to 630 in the central domain. In addition, numerous nucleotides in the 5' and central domains exhibit enhanced reactivity in response to S16. Interestingly, the strength of the S20-dependent effects in the 1430-1450 region is attenuated in the presence of S4 + S8 + S20, and restored in the presence of S4 + S8 + S20 + S16. Finally, the previously observed rearrangement of the 300 region stem-loop that occurs during assembly is shown to be an S16-dependent event. We discuss these findings with respect to assignment of RNA binding sites for these proteins, and in regard to the co-operativity of ribosome assembly.     

RNA-protein interactions in the ribosome. I. Characterization and ribonuclease digestion of 16 S RNA-ribosomal protein complexes

Proteins from the 30 S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli were fractionated by column chromatography and individually incubated with 16 S ribosomal RNA. Stable and specific complexes were formed between proteins S4, S7, S8, S15 and S20, and the 16 S RNA. Protein S13 and one or both proteins of the $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ mixture bound more weakly to the RNA, although these interactions too were apparently specific. The binding of $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ was found to be markedly stimulated by proteins S4, S8, S15 and S20. Limited digestion of the RNA-protein complexes with T₁ or pancreatic ribonucleases yielded a variety of partially overlapping RNA fragments, which retained one or more of the proteins. Since similar fragments were recovered when 16 S RNA alone was digested under the same conditions, their stability could not be accounted for by the presence of bound protein. The integrity of the fragments was, however, strongly influenced by the magnesium ion concentration at which ribonuclease digestion was carried out. Each of the RNA fragments was characterized by fingerprinting and positioned within the sequence of the 1600-nucleotide 16 S RNA molecule. The location of ribosomal protein binding sites was delimited by the pattern of fragments to which a given protein bound. The binding sites for proteins S4, S8, S15, S20 and, possibly, S13 and $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ as well, lie within the 5′-terminal half of the 16 S RNA molecule. In particular, the S4 binding site was localized to the first 500 nucleotides of this sequence while that for S15 lies within a 140-nucleotide sequence starting about 600 nucleotides from the 5′-terminus. The binding site for the protein S7 lies between 900 and 1500 nucleotides from the 5′-terminus of the ribosomal RNA.     

RNA--protein interactions in the ribosome. IV. Structure and properties of binding sites for proteins S4, S16/S17 and S20 in the 16S RNA

Proteins S4, S16/S17 and S20 of the 30 S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli+ associate with specific binding sites in the 16 S ribosomal RNA. A systematic investigation of the co-operative interactions that occur when two or more of these proteins simultaneously attach to the 16 S RNA indicate that their binding sites lie near to one another. The binding site for S4 has previously been located within a 550-nucleotide RNA fragment of approximately 9 S that arises from the 5′-terminal portion of the 16 S RNA upon limited hydrolysis with pancreatic ribonuclease. The 9 S RNA was unable to associate with S20 and S16/S17, however, either alone or in combination. A fragment of similar size and nucleotide sequence, termed the 9 S¹ RNA, has been isolated following ribonuclease digestion of the complex of 16 S RNA with S20 and S16/S17. The 9 S¹ RNA bound not only S4, but S20 and S16/S17 as well, although the fragment complex was stable only when both of the latter protein fractions were present together. Nonetheless, measurements of binding stoichiometry demonstrated the interactions to be specific under these conditions. A comparison of the 9 S and 9 S¹ RNAs by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels containing urea revealed that the two fragments differ substantially in the number and distribution of hidden breaks. Contrary to expectation, the RNA in the ribonucleoprotein complex appeared to be more accessible to ribonuclease than the free 16 S RNA as judged by the smaller average length of the sub-fragments recovered from the 9 S¹ RNA. These results suggest that the binding of S4, S16/S17 and S20 brings about a conformational alteration within the 5′ third of the 16 S RNA.To delineate further the portions of the RNA chain that interact with S4, S16/S17 and S20, specific fragments encompassing subsequences from the 5′ third of the 16 S RNA were sought. Two such fragments, designated 12 S-I and 12 S-II, were purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis from partial T₁ ribonuclease digests of the 16 S RNA. The two RNAs, which contain 290 and 210 nucleotides, respectively, are contiguous and together span the entire 5′-terminal 500 residues of the 16 S RNA molecule. When tested individually, neither 12 S-I nor 12 S-II bound S4, S16/S17 or S20. If heated together at 40 °C in the presence of Mg²⁺ ions, however, the two fragments together formed an 8 S complex which associated with S4 alone, with S16/S17 + S20 in combination, and with S4 + S16/S17 + S20 when incubated with an un fractionated mixture of 30 S subunit proteins. These results imply that each fragment contains part of the corresponding binding sites.     

Differential assembly of 16S rRNA domains during 30S subunit formation

Rapid and accurate assembly of the ribosomal subunits, which are responsible for protein synthesis, is required to sustain cell growth. Our best understanding of the interaction of 30S ribosomal subunit components (16S ribosomal RNA [rRNA] and 20 ribosomal proteins [r-proteins]) comes from in vitro work using Escherichia coli ribosomal components. However, detailed information regarding the essential elements involved in the assembly of 30S subunits still remains elusive. Here, we defined a set of rRNA nucleotides that are critical for the assembly of the small ribosomal subunit in E. coli. Using an RNA modification interference approach, we identified 54 nucleotides in 16S rRNA whose modification prevents the formation of a functional small ribosomal subunit. The majority of these nucleotides are located in the head and interdomain junction of the 30S subunit, suggesting that these regions are critical for small subunit assembly. In vivo analysis of specific identified sites, using engineered mutations in 16S rRNA, revealed defective protein synthesis capability, aberrant polysome profiles, and abnormal 16S rRNA processing, indicating the importance of these residues in vivo. These studies reveal that specific segments of 16S rRNA are more critical for small subunit assembly than others, and suggest a hierarchy of importance.     

RNA-protein interactions in the ribosome. II. Binding of ribosomal proteins to isolated fragments of the 16 S RNA

Specific fragments of the 16 S ribosomal RNA of Escherichia coli have been isolated and tested for their ability to interact with proteins of the 30 S ribosomal subunit. The 12 S RNA, a 900-nucleotide fragment derived from the 5′-terminal portion of the 16 S RNA, was shown to form specific complexes with proteins S4, S8, S15, and S20. The stoichiometry of binding at saturation was determined in each case. Interaction between the 12 S RNA and protein fraction $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ was detected in the presence of S4, S8, S15 and S20; only these proteins were able to bind to this fragment, even when all 21 proteins of the 30 S subunit were added to the reaction mixture. Protein S4 also interacted specifically with the 9 S RNA, a fragment of 500 nucleotides that corresponds to the 5′-terminal third of the 16 S RNA, and protein S15 bound independently to the 4 S RNA, a fragment containing 140 nucleotides situated toward the middle of the RNA molecule. None of the proteins interacted with the 600-nucleotide 8 S fragment that arose from the 3′-end of the 16 S RNA.When the 16 S RNA was incubated with an unfractionated mixture of 30 S subunit proteins at 0 °C, 10 to 12 of the proteins interacted with the ribosomal RNA to form the reconstitution intermediate (RI) particle. Limited hydrolysis of this particle with T₁ ribonuclease yielded 14 S and 8 S subparticles whose RNA components were indistinguishable from the 12 S and 8 S RNAs isolated from digests of free 16 S RNA. The 14 S subparticle contained proteins S6 and S18 in addition to the RNA-binding proteins S4, S8, S15, S20 and $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$. The 8 S subparticle contained proteins S7, S9, S13 and S19. These findings serve to localize the sites at which proteins incapable of independent interaction with 16 S RNA are fixed during the early stages of 30 S subunit assembly.     

A method of preparing Escherichia coli 16 S RNA possessing previously unobserved 30 S ribosomal protein binding sites

A method of preparing 16 S RNA has been developed which yields RNA capable of binding specifically at least 12, and possibly 13, 30 S ribosomal proteins. This RNA, prepared by precipitation from 30 S subunits using a mixture of acetic acid and urea, is able to form stable complexes with proteins S3, S5, S9, S12, S13, S18 and possibly S11. In addition, this RNA has not been impaired in its capacity to interact with proteins S4, S7, S8, S15, S17 and S20, which are proteins that most other workers have shown to bind RNA prepared by the traditional phenol extraction procedure (Held et al., 1974; Garrett et al., 1971; Schaup et al., 1970,1971).We have applied several criteria of specificity to the binding of proteins to 16 S RNA prepared by the acetic acid-urea method. First, the new set of proteins interacts only with acetic acid-urea 16 S RNA and not with 16 S RNA prepared by the phenol method or with 23 S RNA prepared by the acetic acid-urea procedure. Second, 50 S ribosomal proteins do not interact with acetic acidurea 16 S RNA but do bind to 23 S RNA. Third, in the case of protein S9, we have shown that the bound protein co-sediments with acetic acid-urea 16 S RNA in a sucrose gradient. Additionally, a saturation binding experiment showed that approximately one mole of protein S9 binds acetic acid-urea 16 S RNA at saturation. Thus, we conclude that the method employed for the preparation of 16 S RNA greatly influences the ability of the RNA to form specific protein complexes. The significance of these results is discussed with regard to the in vitro assembly sequence.     

Assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit: positioning ribosomal protein S13 in the S7 assembly branch

Studies of Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunit assembly have revealed a hierarchical and cooperative association of ribosomal proteins with 16S ribosomal RNA; these results have been used to compile an in vitro 30S subunit assembly map. In single protein addition and omission studies, ribosomal protein S13 was shown to be dependent on the prior association of ribosomal protein S20 for binding to the ribonucleoprotein particle. While the overwhelming majority of interactions revealed in the assembly map are consistent with additional data, the dependency of S13 on S20 is not. Structural studies position S13 in the head of the 30S subunit > 100 A away from S20, which resides near the bottom of the body of the 30S subunit. All of the proteins that reside in the head of the 30S subunit, except S13, have been shown to be part of the S7 assembly branch, that is, they all depend on S7 for association with the assembling 30S subunit. Given these observations, the assembly requirements for S13 were investigated using base-specific chemical footprinting and primer extension analysis. These studies reveal that S13 can bind to 16S rRNA in the presence of S7, but not S20. Additionally, interaction between S13 and other members of the S7 assembly branch have been observed. These results link S13 to the 3' major domain family of proteins, and the S7 assembly branch, placing S13 in a new location in the 30S subunit assembly map where its position is in accordance with much biochemical and structural data.     

Crystal structure of the 30 S ribosomal subunit from Thermus thermophilus: structure of the proteins and their interactions with 16 S RNA

We present a detailed analysis of the protein structures in the 30 S ribosomal subunit from Thermus thermophilus, and their interactions with 16 S RNA based on a crystal structure at 3.05 A resolution. With 20 different polypeptide chains, the 30 S subunit adds significantly to our data base of RNA structure and protein-RNA interactions. In addition to globular domains, many of the proteins have long, extended regions, either in the termini or in internal loops, which make extensive contact to the RNA component and are involved in stabilizing RNA tertiary structure. Many ribosomal proteins share similar alpha+beta sandwich folds, but we show that the topology of this domain varies considerably, as do the ways in which the proteins interact with RNA. Analysis of the protein-RNA interactions in the context of ribosomal assembly shows that the primary binders are globular proteins that bind at RNA multihelix junctions, whereas proteins with long extensions assemble later. We attempt to correlate the structure with a large body of biochemical and genetic data on the 30 S subunit.     

Molecular interactions of ribosomal components. IV: Cooperative interactions during assembly in vitro

Cooperative interactions between different 30S ribosomal proteins during assembly in vitro are described. The site specific binding of S7 to 16S RNA is enhanced by S20; that of S16 requires S4 and S20; and S7 is required for the maximum binding of S9, S13 and S19. Some of these interactions are reflected in the protein neighborhoods of the functional ribosome, but this may not be a general rule. Finally, we suggest that the assembly cooperativety observed may not be a consequence of direct-protein interactions.     

Functional role of ribosomal signatures

Although structure and sequence signatures in ribosomal RNA and proteins are defining characteristics of the three domains of life and instrumental in constructing the modern phylogeny, little is known about their functional roles in the ribosome. In this work, the largest coevolving RNA/protein signatures in the bacterial 30S ribosome are investigated both experimentally and computationally through all-atom molecular-dynamics simulations. The complex includes the N-terminal fragment of the ribosomal protein S4, which is a primary binding protein that initiates 30S small subunit assembly from the 5′ domain, and helix 16 (h16), which is part of the five-way junction in 16S rRNA. Our results show that the S4 N-terminus signature is intrinsically disordered in solution, whereas h16 is relatively stable by itself. The dynamic disordered property of the protein is exploited to couple the folding and binding process to the five-way junction, and the results provide insight into the mechanism for the early and fast binding of S4 in the assembly of the ribosomal small subunit.     

Efficient reconstitution of functional Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunits from a complete set of recombinant small subunit ribosomal proteins.

Previous studies have shown that the 30S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli can be reconstituted in vitro from individually purified ribosomal proteins and 16S ribosomal RNA, which were isolated from natural 30S subunits. We have developed a 30S subunit reconstitution system that uses only recombinant ribosomal protein components. The genes encoding E. coli ribosomal proteins S2-S21 were cloned, and all twenty of the individual proteins were overexpressed and purified. Reconstitution, following standard procedures, using the complete set of recombinant proteins and purified 16S ribosomal RNA is highly inefficient. Efficient reconstitution of 30S subunits using these components requires sequential addition of proteins, following either the 30S subunit assembly map (Mizushima & Nomura, 1970, Nature 226:1214-1218; Held et al., 1974, J Biol Chem 249:3103-3111) or following the order of protein assembly predicted from in vitro assembly kinetics (Powers et al., 1993, J MoI Biol 232:362-374). In the first procedure, the proteins were divided into three groups, Group I (S4, S7, S8, S15, S17, and S20), Group II (S5, S6, S9, Sll, S12, S13, S16, S18, and S19), and Group III (S2, S3, S10, S14, and S21), which were sequentially added to 16S rRNA with a 20 min incubation at 42 degrees C following the addition of each group. In the second procedure, the proteins were divided into Group I (S4, S6, S11, S15, S16, S17, S18, and S20), Group II (S7, S8, S9, S13, and S19), Group II' (S5 and S12) and Group III (S2, S3, S10, S14, and S21). Similarly efficient reconstitution is observed whether the proteins are grouped according to the assembly map or according to the results of in vitro 30S subunit assembly kinetics. Although reconstitution of 30S subunits using the recombinant proteins is slightly less efficient than reconstitution using a mixture of total proteins isolated from 30S subunits, it is much more efficient than reconstitution using proteins that were individually isolated from ribosomes. Particles reconstituted from the recombinant proteins sediment at 30S in sucrose gradients, bind tRNA in a template-dependent manner, and associate with 50S subunits to form 70S ribosomes that are active in poly(U)-directed polyphenylalanine synthesis. Both the protein composition and the dimethyl sulfate modification pattern of 16S ribosomal RNA are similar for 30S subunits reconstituted with either recombinant proteins or proteins isolated as a mixture from ribosomal subunits as well as for natural 30S subunits.     

Apparent association constants for E. coli ribosomal proteins S4, S7, S8, S15, S17 and S20 binding to 16S RNA.

We have previously reported the development of a technique utilizing nitrocellulose filters, which rapidly separates ribosomal protein-ribosomal RNA complexes from unbound protein. We have used this technique to obtain binding data for the association of proteins S4, S7, S8, S15, S17, and S20 with 16S RNA. With the exception of protein S17, the association behavior for each of these proteins exhibits a single binding site with a unique binding constant. The apparent association constants have been calculated and have been found to have a range from 1.6 x 10(6) M-1 for protein S7 to 7.1 x 10(7) M-1 for protein S17. The Scatchard plot for the protein S17 binding data is biphasic, suggesting that within the RNA population two different binding sites exist, each with a different apparent association constant.     

Further evidence that the ribosomal 30S proteins S3, S5, S9, S11, S12, and S18 possess specific 16S RNA binding sites

Summary E. coli ribosomal 16S RNA preparted by an acetic acid-urea extraction technique individually binds, in addition to the seven established proteins, 6 new 30S ribosomal proteins (S3, S5, S9, S12, S18 and S11) (Hochkeppel et al., 1976). In this communication we demonstrate the site specificity of these proteins. Binding curves of the individual proteins with acetic acid-urea 16S RNA show that the binding of all six proteins to the RNA reaches a plateau at 0.3–0.97 copies per 16S RNA molecule. No significant binding of these proteins to classical phenol extracted 16S RNA is observed, with the exception of S13 which binds 0.2 copies of protein per molecule of 16S RNA. Specificity of binding of these proteins is also demonstrated in chase experiments. The site specificity of individual [³H]-labeled 30S proteins bound to 16S RNA is tested by the addition of non-radioactive 30S total protein to the reaction mixture.     

The Genesis of Ribosome Structure: How a Protein Generates RNA Structure in Real Time

Ribosomal subunit assembly is initiated by the binding of several primary binding proteins. Results from chemical modification studies show that 16S ribosomal RNA undergoes striking structural rearrangements when protein S17 is bound. For the first time, we are able to distinguish and order these structural rearrangements by using time-dependent chemical probing. Initially, protein S17 binds to a portion of helix 11, inducing a kink-turn in that helix that bends helix 7 toward the S17-helix 11 complex in a hairpin-like manner, allowing helix 7 to bind to protein S17. This structural change is rapidly stabilized by interactions at the distal and proximal ends of both RNA helices. Identifying the dynamic nature of interactions between RNA and proteins is not only essential in unraveling ribosome assembly, but also has more general application to all protein-RNA interactions.