Interplay between tau and α‐synuclein liquid–liquid phase separation

In Parkinson''s disease with dementia, up to 50% of patients develop a high number of tau‐containing neurofibrillary tangles. Tau‐based pathologies may thus act synergistically with the α‐synuclein pathology to confer a worse prognosis. A better understanding of the relationship between the two distinct pathologies is therefore required. Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) of proteins has recently been shown to be important for protein aggregation involved in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, whereas tau phase separation has been linked to Alzheimer''s disease. We therefore investigated the interaction of α‐synuclein with tau and its consequences on tau LLPS. We find α‐synuclein to have a low propensity for both, self‐coacervation and RNA‐mediated LLPS at pH 7.4. However, full‐length but not carboxy‐terminally truncated α‐synuclein efficiently partitions into tau/RNA droplets. We further demonstrate that Cdk2‐phosphorylation promotes the concentration of tau into RNA‐induced droplets, but at the same time decreases the amount of α‐synuclein inside the droplets. NMR spectroscopy reveals that the interaction of the carboxy‐terminal domain of α‐synuclein with the proline‐rich region P2 of tau is required for the recruitment of α‐synuclein into tau droplets. The combined data suggest that the concentration of α‐synuclein into tau‐associated condensates can contribute to synergistic aSyn/tau pathologies.     

RNA‐binding protein RBM47 stabilizes IFNAR1 mRNA to potentiate host antiviral activity

The type I interferon (IFN‐I, IFN‐α/β)‐mediated immune response is the first line of host defense against invading viruses. IFN‐α/β binds to IFN‐α/β receptors (IFNARs) and triggers the expression of IFN‐stimulated genes (ISGs). Thus, stabilization of IFNARs is important for prolonging antiviral activity. Here, we report the induction of an RNA‐binding motif‐containing protein, RBM47, upon viral infection or interferon stimulation. Using multiple virus infection models, we demonstrate that RBM47 has broad‐spectrum antiviral activity in vitro and in vivo. RBM47 has no noticeable impact on IFN production, but significantly activates the IFN‐stimulated response element (ISRE) and enhances the expression of interferon‐stimulated genes (ISGs). Mechanistically, RBM47 binds to the 3''UTR of IFNAR1 mRNA, increases mRNA stability, and retards the degradation of IFNAR1. In summary, this study suggests that RBM47 is an interferon‐inducible RNA‐binding protein that plays an essential role in enhancing host IFN downstream signaling.     

SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid protein phase‐separates with RNA and with human hnRNPs

Tightly packed complexes of nucleocapsid protein and genomic RNA form the core of viruses and assemble within viral factories, dynamic compartments formed within the host cells associated with human stress granules. Here, we test the possibility that the multivalent RNA‐binding nucleocapsid protein (N) from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) condenses with RNA via liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) and that N protein can be recruited in phase‐separated forms of human RNA‐binding proteins associated with SG formation. Robust LLPS with RNA requires two intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), the N‐terminal IDR and central‐linker IDR, as well as the folded C‐terminal oligomerization domain, while the folded N‐terminal domain and the C‐terminal IDR are not required. N protein phase separation is induced by addition of non‐specific RNA. In addition, N partitions in vitro into phase‐separated forms of full‐length human hnRNPs (TDP‐43, FUS, hnRNPA2) and their low‐complexity domains (LCs). These results provide a potential mechanism for the role of N in SARS‐CoV‐2 viral genome packing and in host‐protein co‐opting necessary for viral replication and infectivity.     

Crystal Structures and RNA-binding Properties of the RNA Recognition Motifs of Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein L: INSIGHTS INTO ITS ROLES IN ALTERNATIVE SPLICING REGULATION

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L (hnRNP L) is an abundant RNA-binding protein implicated in many bioprocesses, including pre-mRNA processing, mRNA export of intronless genes, internal ribosomal entry site-mediated translation, and chromatin modification. It contains four RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) that bind with CA repeats or CA-rich elements. In this study, surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy assays revealed that all four RRM domains contribute to RNA binding. Furthermore, we elucidated the crystal structures of hnRNP L RRM1 and RRM34 at 2.0 and 1.8 Å, respectively. These RRMs all adopt the typical β1α1β2β3α2β4 topology, except for an unusual fifth β-strand in RRM3. RRM3 and RRM4 interact intimately with each other mainly through helical surfaces, leading the two β-sheets to face opposite directions. Structure-based mutations and surface plasmon resonance assay results suggested that the β-sheets of RRM1 and RRM34 are accessible for RNA binding. FRET-based gel shift assays (FRET-EMSA) and steady-state FRET assays, together with cross-linking and dynamic light scattering assays, demonstrated that hnRNP L RRM34 facilitates RNA looping when binding to two appropriately separated binding sites within the same target pre-mRNA. EMSA and isothermal titration calorimetry binding studies with in vivo target RNA suggested that hnRNP L-mediated RNA looping may occur in vivo. Our study provides a mechanistic explanation for the dual functions of hnRNP L in alternative splicing regulation as an activator or repressor.     

m6A modification of HSATIII lncRNAs regulates temperature‐dependent splicing

Nuclear stress bodies (nSBs) are nuclear membraneless organelles formed around stress‐inducible HSATIII architectural long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). nSBs repress splicing of hundreds of introns during thermal stress recovery, which are partly regulated by CLK1 kinase phosphorylation of temperature‐dependent Ser/Arg‐rich splicing factors (SRSFs). Here, we report a distinct mechanism for this splicing repression through protein sequestration by nSBs. Comprehensive identification of RNA‐binding proteins revealed HSATIII association with proteins related to N⁶‐methyladenosine (m⁶A) RNA modification. 11% of the first adenosine in the repetitive HSATIII sequence were m⁶A‐modified. nSBs sequester the m⁶A writer complex to methylate HSATIII, leading to subsequent sequestration of the nuclear m⁶A reader, YTHDC1. Sequestration of these factors from the nucleoplasm represses m⁶A modification of pre‐mRNAs, leading to repression of m⁶A‐dependent splicing during stress recovery phase. Thus, nSBs serve as a common platform for regulation of temperature‐dependent splicing through dual mechanisms employing two distinct ribonucleoprotein modules with partially m⁶A‐modified architectural lncRNAs.     

Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 and H3K27me3 Cooperate with H3K9 Methylation To Maintain Heterochromatin Protein 1α at Chromatin

Methylation of histone H3 on lysine 9 or 27 is crucial for heterochromatin formation. Previously considered hallmarks of, respectively, constitutive and facultative heterochromatin, recent evidence has accumulated in favor of coexistence of these two marks and their cooperation in gene silencing maintenance. H3K9me2/3 ensures anchorage at chromatin of heterochromatin protein 1α (HP1α), a main component of heterochromatin. HP1α chromoshadow domain, involved in dimerization and interaction with partners, has additional but still unclear roles in HP1α recruitment to chromatin. Because of previously suggested links between polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which catalyzes H3K27 methylation, and HP1α, we tested whether PRC2 may regulate HP1α abundance at chromatin. We found that the EZH2 and SUZ12 subunits of PRC2 are required for HP1α stability, as knockdown of either protein led to HP1α degradation. Similar results were obtained upon overexpression of H3K27me2/3 demethylases. We further showed that binding of HP1α/β/γ to H3K9me3 peptides is greatly increased in the presence of H3K27me3, and this is dependent on PRC2. These data fit with recent proteomic studies identifying PRC2 as an indirect H3K9me3 binder in mouse tissues and suggest the existence of a cooperative mechanism of HP1α anchorage at chromatin involving H3 methylation on both K9 and K27 residues.