Structural basis for interaction of DivIVA/GpsB proteins with their ligands

DivIVA proteins and their GpsB homologues are late cell division proteins found in Gram‐positive bacteria. DivIVA/GpsB proteins associate with the inner leaflet of the cytosolic membrane and act as scaffolds for other proteins required for cell growth and division. DivIVA/GpsB proteins comprise an N‐terminal lipid‐binding domain for membrane association fused to C‐terminal domains supporting oligomerization. Despite sharing the same domain organization, DivIVA and GpsB serve different cellular functions: DivIVA plays diverse roles in division site selection, chromosome segregation and controlling peptidoglycan homeostasis, whereas GpsB contributes to the spatiotemporal control of penicillin‐binding protein activity. The crystal structures of the lipid‐binding domains of DivIVA from Bacillus subtilis and GpsB from several species share a fold unique to this group of proteins, whereas the C‐terminal domains of DivIVA and GpsB are radically different. A number of pivotal features identified from the crystal structures explain the functional differences between the proteins. Herein we discuss these structural and functional relationships and recent advances in our understanding of how DivIVA/GpsB proteins bind and recruit their interaction partners, knowledge that might be useful for future structure‐based DivIVA/GpsB inhibitor design.     

Unusual binding interactions in PDZ domain crystal structures help explain binding mechanisms

PDZ domains most commonly bind the C‐terminus of their protein targets. Typically the C‐terminal four residues of the protein target are considered as the binding motif, particularly the C‐terminal residue (P0) and third‐last residue (P‐2) that form the major contacts with the PDZ domain's “binding groove”. We solved crystal structures of seven human PDZ domains, including five of the seven PDLIM family members. The structures of GRASP, PDLIM2, PDLIM5, and PDLIM7 show a binding mode with only the C‐terminal P0 residue bound in the binding groove. Importantly, in some cases, the P‐2 residue formed interactions outside of the binding groove, providing insight into the influence of residues remote from the binding groove on selectivity. In the GRASP structure, we observed both canonical and noncanonical binding in the two molecules present in the asymmetric unit making a direct comparison of these binding modes possible. In addition, structures of the PDZ domains from PDLIM1 and PDLIM4 also presented here allow comparison with canonical binding for the PDLIM PDZ domain family. Although influenced by crystal packing arrangements, the structures nevertheless show that changes in the positions of PDZ domain side‐chains and the αB helix allow noncanonical binding interactions. These interactions may be indicative of intermediate states between unbound and fully bound PDZ domain and target protein. The noncanonical “perpendicular” binding observed potentially represents the general form of a kinetic intermediate. Comparison with canonical binding suggests that the rearrangement during binding involves both the PDZ domain and its ligand.     

Essential role of Dkk3 for head formation by inhibiting Wnt/β‐catenin and Nodal/Vg1 signaling pathways in the basal chordate amphioxus

To dissect the molecular mechanism of head specification in the basal chordate amphioxus, we investigated the function of Dkk3, a secreted protein in the Dickkopf family, which is expressed anteriorly in early embryos. Amphioxus Dkk3 has three domains characteristic of Dkk3 proteins—an N‐terminal serine rich domain and two C‐terminal cysteine‐rich domains (CRDs). In addition, amphioxus Dkk3 has a TGFβ‐receptor 2 domain, which is not present in Dkk3 proteins of other species. As vertebrate Dkk3 proteins have been reported to regulate either Nodal signaling or Wnt/β‐catenin signaling but not both in the same species, we tested the effects of Dkk3 on signaling by these two pathways in amphioxus embryos. Loss of function experiments with an anti‐sense morpholino oligonucleotide (MO) against amphioxus Dkk3 resulted in larvae with truncated heads and concomitant loss of expression of anterior gene markers. The resemblance of the headless phenotype to that from upregulation of Wnt/β‐catenin signaling with BIO, a GSK3β inhibitor, suggested that Dkk3 might inhibit Wnt/β‐catenin signaling. In addition, the Dkk3 MO rescued dorsal structures in amphioxus embryos treated with SB505124, an inhibitor of Nodal signaling, indicating that amphioxus Dkk3 can also inhibit Nodal signaling. In vitro assays in Xenopus animal caps showed that Nodal inhibition is largely due to domains other than the TGFβ domain. We conclude that amphioxus Dkk3 regulates head formation by modulating both Wnt/β‐catenin and Nodal signaling, and that these functions may have been partitioned among various vertebrate lineages during evolution of Dkk3 proteins.     

NMR solution structures of actin depolymerizing factor homology domains

Actin is one of the most conserved proteins in nature. Its assembly and disassembly are regulated by many proteins, including the family of actin‐depolymerizing factor homology (ADF‐H) domains. ADF‐H domains can be divided into five classes: ADF/cofilin, glia maturation factor (GMF), coactosin, twinfilin, and Abp1/drebrin. The best‐characterized class is ADF/cofilin. The other four classes have drawn much less attention and very few structures have been reported. This study presents the solution NMR structure of the ADF‐H domain of human HIP‐55‐drebrin‐like protein, the first published structure of a drebrin‐like domain (mammalian), and the first published structure of GMF β (mouse). We also determined the structures of mouse GMF γ, the mouse coactosin‐like domain and the C‐terminal ADF‐H domain of mouse twinfilin 1. Although the overall fold of the five domains is similar, some significant differences provide valuable insights into filamentous actin (F‐actin) and globular actin (G‐actin) binding, including the identification of binding residues on the long central helix. This long helix is stabilized by three or four residues. Notably, the F‐actin binding sites of mouse GMF β and GMF γ contain two additional β‐strands not seen in other ADF‐H structures. The G‐actin binding site of the ADF‐H domain of human HIP‐55‐drebrin‐like protein is absent and distorted in mouse GMF β and GMF γ.     

The crystal structure of Clostridium perfringens SleM,a muramidase involved in cortical hydrolysis during spore germination

Clostridium perfringens spores employ two peptidoglycan lysins to degrade the spore cortex during germination. SleC initiates cortex hydrolysis to generate cortical fragments that are degraded further by the muramidase SleM. Here, we present the crystal structure of the C. perfringens S40 SleM protein at 1.8 Å. SleM comprises an N‐terminal catalytic domain that adopts an irregular α/β‐barrel fold that is common to GH25 family lysozymes, plus a C‐terminal fibronectin type III domain. The latter is involved in forming the SleM dimer that is evident in both the crystal structure and in solution. A truncated form of SleM that lacks the FnIII domain shows reduced activity against spore sacculi indicating that this domain may have a role in facilitating the position of substrate with respect to the enzyme's active site. Proteins 2016; 84:1681–1689. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Zyxin: Zinc fingers at sites of cell adhesion

Zyxin is a low abundance phosphoprotein that is localized at sites of cell-substratum adhesion in fibroblasts. Zyxin displays the architectural features of an intracellular signal transducer. The protein exhibits an extensive proline-rich domain, a nuclear export signal and three copies of the LIM motif, a double zinc-finger domain found in many proteins that play central roles in regulation of cell differentiation. Zyxin interacts with α-actinin, members of the cysteine-rich protein (CRP) family, proteins that display Src homology 3 (SH3) domains and Ena/VASP family members. Zyxin and its partners have been implicated in the spatial control of actin filament assembly as well as in pathways important for cell differentiation. Based on its repertoire of binding partners and its behavior, zyxin may serve as a scaffold for the assembly of multimeric protein machines that function in the nucleus and at sites of cell adhesion.     

Intrinsic flexibility of NLRP pyrin domains is a key factor in their conformational dynamics,fold stability,and dimerization

Nucleotide‐binding domain leucine‐rich repeat‐containing receptors (NLRs) are key proteins in the innate immune system. The 14 members of the NLRP family of NLRs contain an N‐terminal pyrin domain which is central for complex formation and signal transduction. Recently, X‐ray structures of NLRP14 revealed an unexpected rearrangement of the α5/6 stem‐helix of the pyrin domain allowing a novel symmetric dimerization mode. We characterize the conformational transitions underlying NLRP oligomerization using molecular dynamics simulations. We describe conformational stability of native NLRP14 and mutants in their monomeric and dimeric states and compare them to NLRP4, a representative of a native pyrin domain fold. Thereby, we characterize the interplay of conformational dynamics, fold stability, and dimerization in NLRP pyrin domains. We show that intrinsic flexibility of NLRP pyrin domains is a key factor influencing their behavior in physiological conditions. Additionally, we provide further evidence for the crucial importance of a charge relay system within NLRPs that critically influences their conformational ensemble in solution.     

Processing of cholinesterase-like α/β-hydrolase fold proteins: alterations associated with congenital disorders

The α/β hydrolase fold family is perhaps the largest group of proteins presenting significant structural homology with divergent functions, ranging from catalytic hydrolysis to heterophilic cell adhesive interactions to chaperones in hormone production. All the proteins of the family share a common three-dimensional core structure containing the α/β hydrolase fold domain that is crucial for proper protein function. Several mutations associated with congenital diseases or disorders have been reported in conserved residues within the α/β-hydrolase fold domain of cholinesterase-like proteins, neuroligins, butyrylcholinesterase and thyroglobulin. These mutations are known to disrupt the architecture of the common structural domain either globally or locally. Characterization of the natural mutations affecting the α/β-hydrolase fold domain in these proteins has shown that they mainly impair processing and trafficking along the secretory pathway causing retention of the mutant protein in the endoplasmic reticulum. Studying the processing of α/β-hydrolase fold mutant proteins should uncover new functions for this domain, that in some cases require structural integrity for both export of the protein from the ER and for facilitating subunit dimerization. A comparative study of homologous mutations in proteins that are closely related family members, along with the definition of new three-dimensional crystal structures, will identify critical residues for the assembly of the α/β-hydrolase fold.     

Binding determinants of the small heat shock protein, αB‐crystallin: recognition of the ‘IxI’ motif

Small heat shock proteins (sHSPs) play a central role in protein homeostasis under conditions of stress by binding partly unfolded, aggregate‐prone proteins and keeping them soluble. Like many sHSPs, the widely expressed human sHSP, αB‐crystallin (‘αB’), forms large polydisperse multimeric assemblies. Molecular interactions involved in both sHSP function and oligomer formation remain to be delineated. A growing database of structural information reveals that a central conserved α‐crystallin domain (ACD) forms dimeric building blocks, while flanking N‐ and C‐termini direct the formation of larger sHSP oligomers. The most commonly observed inter‐subunit interaction involves a highly conserved C‐terminal ‘IxI/V’ motif and a groove in the ACD that is also implicated in client binding. To investigate the inherent properties of this interaction, peptides mimicking the IxI/V motif of αB and other human sHSPs were tested for binding to dimeric αB‐ACD. IxI‐mimicking peptides bind the isolated ACD at 22°C in a manner similar to interactions observed in the oligomer at low temperature, confirming these interactions are likely to exist in functional αB oligomers.     

Deficiency in mTORC1‐controlled C/EBPβ‐mRNA translation improves metabolic health in mice

The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a central regulator of physiological adaptations in response to changes in nutrient supply. Major downstream targets of mTORC1 signalling are the mRNA translation regulators p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1p70) and the 4E‐binding proteins (4E‐BPs). However, little is known about vertebrate mRNAs that are specifically controlled by mTORC1 signalling and are engaged in regulating mTORC1‐associated physiology. Here, we show that translation of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBPβ) mRNA into the C/EBPβ‐LIP isoform is suppressed in response to mTORC1 inhibition either through pharmacological treatment or through calorie restriction. Our data indicate that the function of 4E‐BPs is required for suppression of LIP. Intriguingly, mice lacking the cis‐regulatory upstream open reading frame (uORF) in the C/EBPβ‐mRNA, which is required for mTORC1‐stimulated translation into C/EBPβ‐LIP, display an improved metabolic phenotype with features also found under calorie restriction. Thus, our data suggest that translational adjustment of C/EBPβ‐isoform expression is one of the key processes that direct metabolic adaptation in response to changes in mTORC1 activity.     

Crystal structure and nucleic acid‐binding activity of the CRISPR‐associated protein Csx1 of Pyrococcus furiosus

In many prokaryotic organisms, chromosomal loci known as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and CRISPR‐associated (CAS) genes comprise an acquired immune defense system against invading phages and plasmids. Although many different Cas protein families have been identified, the exact biochemical functions of most of their constituents remain to be determined. In this study, we report the crystal structure of PF1127, a Cas protein of Pyrococcus furiosus DSM 3638 that is composed of 480 amino acids and belongs to the Csx1 family. The C‐terminal domain of PF1127 has a unique β‐hairpin structure that protrudes out of an α‐helix and contains several positively charged residues. We demonstrate that PF1127 binds double‐stranded DNA and RNA and that this activity requires an intact β‐hairpin and involve the homodimerization of the protein. In contrast, another Csx1 protein from Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 that is composed of 377 amino acids does not have the β‐hairpin structure and exhibits no DNA‐binding properties under the same experimental conditions. Notably, the C‐terminal domain of these two Csx1 proteins is greatly diversified, in contrast to the conserved N‐terminal domain, which appears to play a common role in the homodimerization of the protein. Thus, although P. furiosus Csx1 is identified as a nucleic acid‐binding protein, other Csx1 proteins are predicted to exhibit different individual biochemical activities. Proteins 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Crystal structure of the sensor domain of BaeS from Serratia marcescens FS14

The sensor histidine kinases of two‐component signal‐transduction systems (TCSs) are essential for bacteria to adapt to variable environmental conditions. The two‐component regulatory system BaeS/R increases multidrug and metal resistance in Salmonella and Escherichia coli. In this study, we report the X‐ray structure of the periplasmic sensor domain of BaeS from Serratia marcescens FS14. The BaeS sensor domain (34–160) adopts a mixed α/β‐fold containing a central four‐stranded antiparallel β‐sheet flanked by a long N‐terminal α‐helix and additional loops and a short C‐terminal α‐helix on each side. Structural comparisons revealed that it belongs to the PDC family with a remarkable difference in the orientation of the helix α2. In the BaeS sensor domain, this helix is situated perpendicular to the long helix α1 and holds helix α1 in the middle with the beta sheet, whereas in other PDC domains, helix α2 is parallel to helix α1. Because the helices α1 and α2 is involved in the dimeric interface, this difference implies that BaeS uses a different dimeric interface compared with other PDC domains. Proteins 2017; 85:1784–1790. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Structure and function of the SPRY/B30.2 domain proteins involved in innate immunity

The SPRY domain is a protein interaction module found in 77 murine and ～100 human proteins, and is implicated in important biological pathways, including those that regulate innate and adaptive immunity. The current definition of the SPRY domain is based on a sequence repeat discovered in the sp lA kinase and ry anodine receptors. The greater SPRY family is divided into the B30.2 (which contains a PRY extension at the N‐terminus) and “SPRY‐only” sub‐families. In this brief review, we examine the current structural and biochemical literature on SPRY/B30.2 domain involvement in key immune processes and highlight a PRY‐like 60 amino acid region in the N‐terminus of “SPRY‐only” proteins. Phylogenetic, structural, and functional analyses suggest that this N‐terminal region is related to the PRY region of B30.2 and should be characterized as part of an extended SPRY domain. Greater understanding of the functional importance of the N‐terminal region in “SPRY only” proteins will enhance our ability to interrogate SPRY interactions with their respective binding partners.     

Crystal structure of the protein At3g01520, a eukaryotic universal stress protein‐like protein from arabidopsis thaliana in complex with AMP

Members of the universal stress protein (USP) family are conserved in a phylogenetically diverse range of prokaryotes, fungi, protists, and plants and confer abilities to respond to a wide range of environmental stresses. Arabidopsis thaliana contains 44 USP domain‐containing proteins, and USP domain is found either in a small protein with unknown physiological function or in an N‐terminal portion of a multi‐domain protein, usually a protein kinase. Here, we report the first crystal structure of a eukaryotic USP‐like protein encoded from the gene At3g01520. The crystal structure of the protein At3g01520 was determined by the single‐wavelength anomalous dispersion method and refined to an R factor of 21.8% (R_free = 26.1%) at 2.5 Å resolution. The crystal structure includes three At3g01520 protein dimers with one AMP molecule bound to each protomer, comprising a Rossmann‐like α/β overall fold. The bound AMP and conservation of residues in the ATP‐binding loop suggest that the protein At3g01520 also belongs to the ATP‐binding USP subfamily members. Proteins 2015; 83:1368–1373. © 2015 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Crystal structure of a rigid four-spectrin-repeat fragment of the human desmoplakin plakin domain

The plakin protein family serves to connect cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion molecules to the intermediate filament cytoskeleton. Desmoplakin (DP) is an integral part of desmosomes, where it links desmosomal cadherins to the intermediate filaments. The 1056-amino-acid N-terminal region of DP contains a plakin domain common to members of the plakin family. Plakin domains contain multiple copies of spectrin repeats (SRs). We determined the crystal structure of a fragment of DP, residues 175-630, consisting of four SRs and an inserted SH3 domain. The four repeats form an elongated, rigid structure. The SH3 domain is present in a loop between two helices of an SR and interacts extensively with the preceding SR in a manner that appears to limit inter-repeat flexibility. The intimate intramolecular association of the SH3 domain with the preceding SR is also observed in plectin, another plakin protein, but not in α-spectrin, suggesting that the SH3 domain of plakins contributes to the stability and rigidity of this subfamily of SR-containing proteins.