Identification of a Putative Receptor for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus on Porcine Alveolar Macrophages

To identify the receptor which may determine the macrophage tropism of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against porcine alveolar macrophages (PAM) were produced. Two MAbs (41D3 and 41D5) which completely blocked PRRSV infection of PAM were further characterized. It was found that they reduce the attachment of PRRSV to PAM and immunoprecipitate a 210-kDa membrane protein from PAM. This protein was detected on the cell membranes of PAM but not of PRRSV-nonpermissive cells. A colocalization was found between the reactive sites of MAb 41D3 and PRRSV on PAM membranes. All PRRSV-infected cells in tissues of experimentally infected pigs reacted with MAb 41D3. Taken together, all these data suggest that the identified 210-kDa membrane protein is a putative receptor for PRRSV on porcine macrophages.     

Cloning of a Putative Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subunit

A cDNA clone was isolated from a rat superior cervical ganglion cDNA library with an oligonucleotide that hybridized to muscle-like nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunit cDNA. The deduced amino acid sequence possesses characteristics expected of a nAChR subunit that does not bind acetylcholine, in addition to distinctive features such as unique cysteine residues and N-linked glycosylation sites.     

Isolation and Chromosomal Localization of GPR31, a Human Gene Encoding a Putative G Protein-Coupled Receptor

The screening of a human genomic library with a chemokine receptor-like probe allowed us to obtain a putative member of the G protein-coupled receptor gene (GPCR) family, designated GPR31. Its deduced amino acid sequence encodes a polypeptide of 319 amino acids that shares 25–33% homology with members of the chemokine, purino, and somatostatin receptor gene families. Amino acid sequence comparison reveals that the best match in the protein databases is with the human orphan GPCR called HM74 (33% identity). Southern genomic analysis of the GPR31 gene shows a hybridization pattern consistent with that of a single-copy gene. Using fluorescencein situhybridization, we have determined the chromosomal and regional localization of the GPR31 gene at 6q27. The GPR31 mRNA is expressed at low levels by several human cell lines of different cellular origins. The phylogenetic analysis suggests that the GPR31 receptor may represent a member of a new GPCR subfamily.     

Phosphatidylinositol-Dependent Membrane Fusion Induced by a Putative Fusogenic Sequence of Ebola Virus

The membrane-interacting abilities of three sequences representing the putative fusogenic subdomain of the Ebola virus transmembrane protein have been investigated. In the presence of calcium, the sequence EBO_GE (GAAIGLAWIPYFGPAAE) efficiently fused unilamellar vesicles composed of phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, cholesterol, and phosphatidylinositol (molar ratio, 2:1:1:0.5), a mixture that roughly resembles the lipid composition of the hepatocyte plasma membrane. Analysis of the lipid dependence of the process demonstrated that the fusion activity of EBO_GE was promoted by phosphatidylinositol but not by other acidic phospholipids. In comparison, EBO_EA (EGAAIGLAWIPYFGPAA) and EBO_EE (EGAAIGLAWIPYFGPAAE) sequences, which are similar to EBO_GE except that they bear the negatively charged glutamate residue at the N terminus and at both the N and C termini, respectively, induced fusion to a lesser extent. As revealed by binding experiments, the glutamate residue at the N terminus severely impaired peptide-vesicle interaction. In addition, the fusion-competent EBO_GE sequence did not associate significantly with vesicles lacking phosphatidylinositol. Tryptophan fluorescence quenching by vesicles containing brominated phospholipids indicated that the EBO_GE peptide penetrated to the acyl chain level only when the membranes contained phosphatidylinositol. We conclude that binding and further penetration of the Ebola virus putative fusion peptide into membranes might be governed by the nature of the N-terminal residue and by the presence of phosphatidylinositol in the target membrane. Moreover, since insertion of such a peptide leads to membrane destabilization and fusion, the present data would be compatible with the involvement of this sequence in Ebola virus fusion.Ebola virus belongs to the Filoviridae family (23). This human pathogen occasionally causes epidemics of African hemorrhagic fever with a high rate of mortality (8, 23, 37). Little is known about the viral infectivity mechanism, and there is no specific treatment for Ebola virus hemorrhagic fever as yet. The most prominent pathology of Ebola virus infection includes necrosis of liver parenchyma as a direct consequence of virus replication (23). Ebola virus virions are composed of a helical nucleocapsid containing one linear, negative-sense, single-stranded RNA and surrounded by a lipidic envelope derived from the host cell plasma membrane (8, 23). The envelope contains solely one type of highly glycosylated protein (Ebola GP) arranged into oligomers, most probably trimers, which constitute the spikes that protrude from the virion surface (8, 30, 38, 39).The mode of entry of Ebola virus into target cells remains unknown. However it seems likely that the single surface protein Ebola GP is responsible for both receptor binding and membrane fusion during entry into the host cells. Homology analysis of its coding gene-derived sequence has identified several structural features that Ebola GP shares with other envelope fusion proteins derived from oncogenic retroviruses (12, 39). Just recently a detailed analysis has detected a high degree of structural homology between Ebola GP and the Rous sarcoma virus transmembrane protein (12). Several structural elements that might be involved in the ectodomain fusogenic function are shared by these viruses. In particular, there exists in both viruses an amino acid region bounded by cysteines that has at its center a sequence of approximately 16 uncharged and hydrophobic residues. Its location with respect to the viral membrane, the presence of a canonical fusion tripeptide (YFG in Ebola virus), and the fact that this sequence exhibits a high degree of identity among the Filoviridae members suggest that this region might constitute in Ebola virus the fusion peptide that is critical for virion-membrane fusion in the Retroviridae and other families (11, 40, 41).According to the most widely accepted mechanistic model proposed for the initial phase of the viral fusion process, activation of the viral spikes induces the exposure of previously buried hydrophobic fusion peptides in the vicinity of the target cell (5, 43). Further interaction of the viral fusion peptides with the cell membrane would depend mainly on the capacity for binding of these peptides to the membrane lipid components and could eventually trigger the process that brings about the actual merging of the viral and cell membranes via a currently unknown mechanism (41). This fact has justified the development of in vitro studies on the membrane-destabilizing effects of fusion peptides by using representative synthetic peptides of different viruses and model membranes (7, 15, 19, 29).The membrane environment into which the fusion peptide should partition obviously plays an important role in the process. Previous work from this laboratory has focused on the effect of the target membrane composition on viral fusion. Reports from this and other laboratories indicate the existence of conformational changes induced by lipidic components in the membrane-bound human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) fusion peptide (25, 28, 29), and we have identified a fusogenic conformation of the peptide represented by an extended β-type structure (25, 26, 28). The fusogenic interaction of the HIV-1 fusion peptide is, moreover, sensitive to factors that affect gp41 activity in vivo (27). Modulation of viral fusion by lipids has also been observed for complete virions and reconstituted systems fusing with model membranes (6, 24, 42). These observations indicate that enveloped viruses may optimize host interactions during the entry process, not only at the level of the selective binding to cell receptors but also at the level of the envelope fusion and subsequent capsid penetration.Our primary objective in this study was to confirm that the proposed fusogenic sequence for Ebola virus might interact with membranes, destabilize them, and eventually induce fusion. Because Ebola virus infects and replicates very efficiently in the liver, we initially employed as target membranes large unilamellar vesicles (LUV) made of a lipidic mixture that represents the hepatocyte plasma membrane composition (18). Our results demonstrate that this Ebola virus peptide interacts with phosphatidylinositol (PI)-containing membranes and induces vesicle fusion. Moreover, we show that the sequence lacking the negatively charged Glu residue at the N terminus interacts more efficiently with membranes. These data suggest that, similarly to the HIV-1 fusion peptide (26–28), the Ebola virus peptide segment under study may be important in viral fusion in vivo.     

Investigations of the Contribution of a Putative Glycine Hinge to Ryanodine Receptor Channel Gating

Ryanodine receptor channels (RyR) are key components of striated muscle excitation-contraction coupling, and alterations in their function underlie both inherited and acquired disease. A full understanding of the disease process will require a detailed knowledge of the mechanisms and structures involved in RyR function. Unfortunately, high-resolution structural data, such as exist for K⁺-selective channels, are not available for RyR. In the absence of these data, we have used modeling to identify similarities in the structural elements of K⁺ channel pore-forming regions and postulated equivalent regions of RyR. This has identified a sequence of residues in the cytosolic cavity-lining transmembrane helix of RyR (G⁴⁸⁶⁴LIIDA⁴⁸⁶⁹ in RyR2) analogous to the glycine hinge motif present in many K⁺ channels. Gating in these K⁺ channels can be disrupted by substitution of residues for the hinge glycine. We investigated the involvement of glycine 4864 in RyR2 gating by monitoring properties of recombinant human RyR2 channels in which this glycine is replaced by residues that alter gating in K⁺ channels. Our data demonstrate that introducing alanine at position 4864 produces no significant change in RyR2 function. In contrast, function is altered when glycine 4864 is replaced by either valine or proline, the former preventing channel opening and the latter modifying both ion translocation and gating. Our studies reveal novel information on the structural basis of RyR gating, identifying both similarities with, and differences from, K⁺ channels. Glycine 4864 is not absolutely required for channel gating, but some flexibility at this point in the cavity-lining transmembrane helix is necessary for normal RyR function.     

Mutational Analysis of the Putative Fusion Domain of Ebola Virus Glycoprotein

Ebola viruses contain a single glycoprotein (GP) spike, which functions as a receptor binding and membrane fusion protein. It contains a highly conserved hydrophobic region (amino acids 524 to 539) located 24 amino acids downstream of the N terminus of the Ebola virus GP2 subunit. Comparison of this region with the structural features of the transmembrane subunit of avian retroviral GPs suggests that the conserved Ebola virus hydrophobic region may, in fact, serve as the fusion peptide. To test this hypothesis directly, we introduced conservative (alanine) and nonconservative (arginine) amino acid substitutions at eight positions in this region of the GP2 molecule. The effects of these mutations were deduced from the ability of the Ebola virus GP to complement the infectivity of a vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) lacking the receptor-binding G protein. Some mutations, such as Ile-to-Arg substitutions at positions 532 (I532R), F535R, G536A, and P537R, almost completely abolished the ability of the GP to support VSV infectivity without affecting the transport of GP to the cell surface and its incorporation into virions or the production of virus particles. Other mutations, such as G528R, L529A, L529R, I532A, and F535A, reduced the infectivity of the VSV-Ebola virus pseudotypes by at least one-half. These findings, together with previous reports of liposome association with a peptide corresponding to positions 524 to 539 in the GP molecule, offer compelling support for a fusion peptide role for the conserved hydrophobic region in the Ebola virus GP.     

Putative Active States of a Prototypic G-Protein-Coupled Receptor from Biased Molecular Dynamics

A major current focus of structural work on G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) pertains to the investigation of their active states. However, for virtually all GPCRs, active agonist-bound intermediate states have been difficult to characterize experimentally owing to their higher conformational flexibility, and thus intrinsic instability, as compared to inactive inverse agonist-bound states. In this work, we explored possible activation pathways of the prototypic GPCR bovine rhodopsin by means of biased molecular dynamics simulations. Specifically, we used an explicit atomistic representation of the receptor and its environment, and sampled the conformational transition from the crystal structure of a photoactivated deprotonated state of rhodopsin to the low pH crystal structure of opsin in the presence of 11-trans-retinal, using adiabatic biased molecular dynamics simulations. We then reconstructed the system free-energy landscape along the predetermined transition trajectories using a path collective variable approach based on metadynamics. Our results suggest that the two experimental endpoints of rhodopsin/opsin are connected by at least two different pathways, and that the conformational transition is populated by at least four metastable states of the receptor, characterized by a different amplitude of the outward movement of transmembrane helix 6.     

Solubilisation and Characterisation of a Putative Quisqualate-Type Glutamate Receptor from Chick Brain

The brains of 1-day-old chicks were shown to be a rich source of binding sites with the pharmacological characteristics expected of a quisqualate-type glutamate receptor. alpha-[3H]Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazolepropionate ([3H]AMPA) bound with KD and Bmax values, measured at 0 degree C in the presence of the chaotrope potassium thiocyanate, of 55 nM and 2.6 pmol/mg protein. The regional localisations of [3H]AMPA and [3H]kainate binding sites were manifestly different. The membrane-bound [3H]AMPA binding sites were efficiently solubilised by N-octyl-beta-D-glucopyranoside (1%) in the presence of 0.2 M thiocyanate. In the detergent extract the affinity was 69 nM and there was an apparent increase in the number of sites (Bmax, 4.6 pmol/mg protein). The rank order of potency for competitive ligands in displacing [3H]AMPA binding was quisqualate approximately AMPA greater than 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione greater than L-glutamate greater than kainate and was identical for the membrane-bound and solubilised sites. Dissociation was biphasic with rate constants of 0.117 min-1 and 0.015 min-1. The association rate constants for [3H]AMPA at the solubilised sites were 1.45 x 10(6) M-1 min-1 and 6.55 x 10(6) M-1 min-1. The kinetically derived KD values were 80.7 nM and 2.3 nM. The detection of higher affinity binding sites by kinetic analysis but not by equilibrium binding may be explained by the greater sensitivity of dissociation data to small populations of high-affinity sites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

对虾白斑综合征病毒的细胞因子受体基因的分析与表达

在对虾白斑综合征病毒(White spot syndrome virus,WSSV)的基因组中发现一个具有细胞因子受体特征的开放阅读框,该阅读框全长2022个核苷酸,编码674个氨基酸,蛋白质理论分子量为76kDa。该基因含有真核生物细胞因子gp130受体特征序列。为了研究该基因的功能,采用PCR方法从病毒基因组中扩增出基因片段,克隆到pGEM-T Easy载体中,经BamH I和Sal I双酶切后插入pET28b表达载体中。重组质粒转化到大肠杆菌BL21中,IPTG诱导后,经SDS-PAGE电泳表明在。76kDa处有目的蛋白表达。用冰浴超声波对诱导后的菌液进行处理以获得初步纯化的蛋白,作为抗原人工免疫实验兔子以获得含特异性抗体的抗血清。该基因的表达成功,为其功能的进一步深入研究奠定了基础。     

Characterization of Hepatitis C Virus E2 Glycoprotein Interaction with a Putative Cellular Receptor, CD81

A truncated soluble form of the hepatitis C virus E2 glycoprotein, E2661, binds specifically to the surface of cells expressing human CD81 (hCD81) but not other members of the tetraspanin family (CD9, CD63, and CD151). No differences were noted between the level of E2661 binding to hCD81 expressed on the surface of rat RBL or KM3 cells compared to Daudi and Molt-4 cells, suggesting that additional human-cell-specific factors are not required for the primary interaction of E2 with the cell surface. E2 did not interact with African green monkey (AGM) CD81 on the surface of COS cells, which differs from the hCD81 sequence at four residues within the second extracellular region (EC2) (amino acids [aa] 163, 186, 188, and 196), suggesting that one or more of these residues defines the site of interaction with E2. Various recombinant forms of CD81 EC2 show differences in the ability to bind E2, suggesting that CD81 conformation is important for E2 recognition. Regions of E2 involved in the CD81 interaction were analyzed, and our data suggest that the binding site is of a conformational nature involving aa 480 to 493 and 544 to 551 within the E2 glycoprotein. Finally, we demonstrate that ligation of CD81 by E2661 induced aggregation of lymphoid cells and inhibited B-cell proliferation, demonstrating that E2 interaction with CD81 can modulate cell function.     

Ganglioside GT1b Is a Putative Host Cell Receptor for the Merkel Cell Polyomavirus

The Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) was identified recently in human Merkel cell carcinomas, an aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer. Here, we identify a putative host cell receptor for MCPyV. We found that recombinant MCPyV VP1 pentameric capsomeres both hemagglutinated sheep red blood cells and interacted with ganglioside GT1b in a sucrose gradient flotation assay. Structural differences between the analyzed gangliosides suggest that MCPyV VP1 likely interacts with sialic acids on both branches of the GT1b carbohydrate chain. Identification of a potential host cell receptor for MCPyV will aid in the elucidation of its entry mechanism and pathophysiology.Members of the polyomavirus (PyV) family, including simian virus 40 (SV40), murine PyV (mPyV), and BK virus (BKV), bind cell surface gangliosides to initiate infection (2, 8, 11, 15). PyV capsids are assembled from 72 pentamers (capsomeres) of the major coat protein VP1, with the internal proteins VP2 and VP3 buried within the capsids (7, 12). The VP1 pentamer makes direct contact with the carbohydrate portion of the ganglioside (10, 12, 13) and dictates the specificity of virus interaction with the cell. Gangliosides are glycolipids that contain a ceramide domain inserted into the plasma membrane and a carbohydrate domain that directly binds the virus. Specifically, SV40 binds to ganglioside GM1 (2, 10, 15), mPyV binds to gangliosides GD1a and GT1b (11, 15), and BKV binds to gangliosides GD1b and GT1b (8).Recently, a new human PyV designated Merkel cell PyV (MCPyV) was identified in Merkel cell carcinomas, a rare but aggressive skin cancer of neuroendocrine origin (3). It is as yet unclear whether MCPyV is the causative agent of Merkel cell carcinomas (17). A key to understanding the infectious and transforming properties of MCPyV is the elucidation of its cellular entry pathway. In this study, we identify a putative host cell receptor for MCPyV.Because an intact infectious MCPyV has not yet been isolated, we generated recombinant MCPyV VP1 pentamers in order to characterize cellular factors that bind to MCPyV. VP1 capsomeres have been previously shown to be equivalent to virus with respect to hemagglutination properties (4, 16), and the atomic structure of VP1 bound to sialyllactose has demonstrated that the capsomere is sufficient for this interaction (12, 13). The MCPyV VP1 protein (strain w162) was expressed and purified as described previously (1, 6). Briefly, a glutathione S-transferase-MCPyV VP1 fusion protein was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified using glutathione-Sepharose affinity chromatography. The fusion protein was eluted using glutathione and cleaved in solution with thrombin. The thrombin-cleaved sample was then rechromatographed on a second glutathione-Sepharose column to remove glutathione transferase and any uncleaved protein. The unbound VP1 was then chromatographed on a P-11 phosphocellulose column, and peak fractions eluting between 400 and 450 mM NaCl were collected. The purified protein was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by Coomassie blue staining (Fig. ​(Fig.1A,1A, left) and immunoblotting using an antibody (I58) that generally recognizes PyV VP1 proteins (Fig. ​(Fig.1A,1A, right) (9). Transmission electron microscopy (Philips CM10) analysis confirmed that the purified recombinant MCPyV VP1 formed pentamers (capsomeres), which did not assemble further into virus-like particles (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). In an initial screening of its cell binding properties, we tested whether the MCPyV VP1 pentamers hemagglutinated red blood cells (RBCs). The MCPyV VP1 pentamers were incubated with sheep RBCs and assayed as previously described (5). SV40 and mPyV recombinant VP1 pentamers served as negative and positive controls, respectively. We found that MCPyV VP1 hemagglutinated the RBCs with the same efficiency as mPyV VP1 (protein concentration/hemagglutination unit) (Fig. ​(Fig.1C,1C, compare rows B and C from wells 1 to 11), suggesting that MCPyV VP1 engages a plasma membrane receptor on the RBCs. The recombinant murine VP1 protein used for comparison was from the RA strain, a small plaque virus (4). Thus, MCPyV VP1 has the hemagglutination characteristics of a small plaque mPyV (12, 13).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Characterization of MCPyV VP1. Recombinant MCPyV VP1 forms pentamers and hemagglutinates sheep RBCs. (A) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE and an immunoblot of the purified recombinant MCPyV VP1 protein are shown. Molecular mass markers are indicated. (B) Electron micrograph of the purified MCPyV VP1. MCPyV VP1 (shown in panel A) was diluted to 100 μg/ml and absorbed onto Formvar/carbon-coated copper grids. Samples were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, stained with 1% uranyl acetate, and visualized by transmission electron microscopy at 80 kV. Bar = 20 nm. (C) Sheep RBCs (0.5%) were incubated with decreasing concentrations of purified recombinant SV40 VP1 (row A), mPyV VP1 (row B), and MCPyV VP1 (row C). Wells 1 to 11 contain twofold serial dilutions of protein, starting at 2 μg/ml (well 1). Well 12 contains buffer only and serves as a negative control. Well 7 (rows B and C) corresponds to 128 hemagglutination units per 2 μg/ml VP1 protein.To characterize the chemical nature of the putative receptor for MCPyV, total membranes from RBCs were purified as described previously (15). The plasma membranes (30 μg) were incubated with MCPyV VP1 (0.5 μg) and floated on a discontinuous sucrose gradient (15). After fractionation, the samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with I58. VP1 was found in the bottom of the gradient in the absence of the plasma membranes (Fig. ​(Fig.2A,2A, first panel). In the presence of plasma membranes, a fraction of the VP1 floated to the middle of the gradient (Fig. ​(Fig.2A,2A, second panel), supporting the hemagglutination results that suggested that MCPyV VP1 binds to a receptor on the plasma membrane.Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.MCPyV VP1 binds to a protease-resistant, sialic acid-containing receptor on the plasma membrane. (A) Purified recombinant MCPyV VP1 was incubated with or without the indicated plasma membranes. The samples were floated in a discontinuous sucrose gradient, and the fractions were collected from the top of the gradient, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with the anti-VP1 antibody I58. (B) Control and proteinase K-treated plasma membranes were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by Coomassie blue staining. (C) HeLa cells treated with proteinase K (4 μg/ml) were incubated with MCPyV at 4°C, and the resulting cell lysate was probed for the presence of MCPyV VP1. (D) As described in the legend to panel C, except 293T cells were used. (E) Purified MCPyV VP1 was incubated with plasma membranes pretreated with or without α2-3,6,8 neuraminidase and analyzed as described in the legend to panel A.To determine whether the receptor is a protein or a lipid, plasma membrane preparations (30 μg) were incubated with proteinase K (Sigma), followed by analysis with SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. Under these conditions, the majority of the proteins in the plasma membranes were degraded by the protease (Fig. ​(Fig.2B,2B, compare lanes 1 and 2). Despite the lack of proteins, the proteinase K-treated plasma membranes bound MCPyV VP1 as efficiently as control plasma membranes (Fig. ​(Fig.2A,2A, compare the second and third panels), demonstrating that MCPyV VP1 interacts with a protease-resistant receptor. The absence of VP1 in the bottom fraction in Fig. ​Fig.2A2A (third panel) is consistent with the fact that the buoyant density of the membranes is lowered by proteolysis. Of note, a similar result was seen with binding of the mPyV to the plasma membrane (15). Binding of MCPyV to the cell surface of two human tissue culture cells (i.e., HeLa and 293T) was also largely unaffected by pretreatment of the cells with proteinase K (Fig. 2C and D, compare lanes 1 and 2), further indicating that a nonproteinaceous molecule on the plasma membrane engages the virus.We next determined whether the protease-resistant receptor contains a sialic acid modification. Plasma membranes (10 μg) were incubated with a neuraminidase (α2-3,6,8 neuraminidase; Calbiochem) to remove the sialic acid groups. In contrast to the control plasma membranes, the neuraminidase-treated membranes did not bind MCPyV VP1 (Fig. ​(Fig.2E,2E, compare first and second panels), indicating that the MCPyV receptor includes a sialic acid modification.Gangliosides are lipids that contain sialic acid modifications. We asked if MCPyV VP1 binds to gangliosides similar to other PyV family members. The structures of the gangliosides used in this analysis (gangliosides GM1, GD1a, GD1b, and GT1b) are depicted in Fig. ​Fig.3A.3A. To assess a possible ganglioside-VP1 interaction, we employed a liposome flotation assay established previously (15). When liposomes (consisting of phosphatidyl-choline [19 μl of 10 mg/ml], -ethanolamine [5 μl of 10 mg/ml], -serine [1 μl of 10 mg/ml], and -inositol [3 μl of 10 mg/ml]) were incubated with MCPyV VP1 and subjected to the sucrose flotation assay, the VP1 remained in the bottom fraction (Fig. ​(Fig.3B,3B, first panel), indicating that VP1 does not interact with these phospholipids. However, when liposomes containing GT1b (1 μl of 1 mM), but not GM1 (1 μl of 1 mM) or GD1a (1 μl of 1 mM), were incubated with MCPyV VP1, the vesicles bound this VP1 (Fig. ​(Fig.3B).3B). A low level of virus floated partially when incubated with liposomes containing GD1b (Fig. ​(Fig.3B),3B), perhaps reflecting a weak affinity between MCPyV and GD1b. Importantly, MCPyV binds less efficiently to neuraminidase-treated GT1b-containing liposomes than to GT1b-containing liposomes (Fig. ​(Fig.3B,3B, sixth panel), suggesting that the GT1b sialic acids are involved in virus binding. This finding is consistent with the ability of neuraminidase to block MCPyV binding to the plasma membrane (Fig. ​(Fig.2E).2E). The level of virus flotation observed in the neuraminidase-treated GT1b-containing liposomes is likely due to the inefficiency of the neuraminidase reaction with a high concentration of GT1b used to prepare the vesicles.Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.MCPyV VP1 binds to ganglioside GT1b. (A) Structures of gangliosides GM1, GD1a, GD1b, and GT1b. The nature of the glycosidic linkages is indicated. (B) Purified MCPyV VP1 protein was incubated with liposomes only or with liposomes containing the indicated gangliosides. The samples were analyzed as described in the legend to Fig. ​Fig.2A.2A. Where indicated, GT1b-containing liposomes were pretreated with α2-3,6,8 neuraminidase and analyzed subsequently for virus binding. (C to E) The indicated viruses were incubated with liposomes and analyzed as described in the legend to panel B.As controls, GM1-containing liposomes bound SV40 (Fig. ​(Fig.3C),3C), GD1a-containing liposomes bound mPyV (Fig. ​(Fig.3D),3D), and GD1b-containing liposomes bound BKV (Fig. ​(Fig.3E),3E), demonstrating that the liposomes were functionally intact. We note that, while all of the MCPyV VP1 floated when incubated with liposomes containing GT1b (Fig. ​(Fig.3B,3B, sixth panel), a significant fraction of SV40, mPyV, and BKV VP1 remained in the bottom fraction despite being incubated with liposomes containing their respective ganglioside receptors (Fig. 3C to E, second panels). This result is likely due to the fact that in contrast to MCPyV, which are assembled as pentamers (Fig. ​(Fig.1B),1B), the SV40, mPyV, and BKV used in these experiments are fully assembled particles: their larger and denser nature prevents efficient flotation. Nonetheless, we conclude that MCPyV VP1 binds to ganglioside GT1b efficiently.The observation that GD1a does not bind to MCPyV VP1 suggests that the monosialic acid modification on the right branch of GT1b (Fig. ​(Fig.3A)3A) is insufficient for binding. Similarly, the failure of GD1b to bind MCPyV VP1 suggests that the sialic acid on the left arm of GT1b is necessary for binding. Together, these observations suggest that MCPyV VP1 interacts with sialic acids on both branches of GT1b (Fig. ​(Fig.4).4). A recent structure of SV40 VP1 in complex with the sugar portion of GM1 (10) demonstrated that although SV40 VP1 binds both branches of GM1 (Fig. ​(Fig.4),4), only a single sialic acid in GM1 is involved in this interaction. In the case of mPyV, structures of mPyV VP1 in complex with different carbohydrates (12, 13) revealed that the sialic acid-galactose moiety on the left branch of GD1a (and GT1b) is sufficient for mPyV VP1 binding (Fig. ​(Fig.4).4). Although no structure of BKV in complex with the sugar portion of GD1b (or GT1b) is available, in vitro binding studies (8) have suggested that the disialic acid modification on the right branch of GD1b (and GT1b) is responsible for binding BKV VP1 (Fig. ​(Fig.4).4). Thus, it appears that the unique feature of the MCPyV VP1-GT1b interaction is that the sialic acids on both branches of this ganglioside are likely involved in capsid binding.Open in a separate windowFIG. 4.A potential model of the different VP1-ganglioside interactions (see the text for discussion).The identification of a potential cellular receptor for MCPyV will facilitate the study of its entry mechanism. An important issue for further study is to determine whether MCPyV targets Merkel cells preferentially, and if so, whether GT1b is found in higher levels in these cells to increase susceptibility.     

Autoradiographic Localization of the Putative D4 Dopamine Receptor in Rat Brain

The putative dopamine D4 receptor protein in rat brain was labelled and quantified autoradiographically using two selective benzamides: [³H]YM-09151-2 which labels D2, D3 and D4 dopamine receptors and [³H]Raclopride which labels D2 and D3. The difference in densities of both ligands at saturable concentrations, show a regional distribution for the putative D4 receptor in the following rank order: hippocampus > caudate putamen > olfactory tubercle = substancia nigra > nucleus accumbens core > cerebral cortex > cerebellum. A calculated value of 0.34 pmol/mg protein was attributable to D4 receptor maximum capacity in caudate putamen and was obtained after subtracting the Bmax of the ligands. Our results show that the distribution of D4 receptor only partially overlaps with the D4 mRNA localization reported earlier and is not only associated to limbic structures but to motor areas as well.     

Disabled Is a Putative Adaptor Protein That Functions during Signaling by the Sevenless Receptor Tyrosine Kinase

DRK, the Drosophila homolog of the SH2-SH3 domain adaptor protein Grb2, is required during signaling by the sevenless receptor tyrosine kinase (SEV). One role of DRK is to provide a link between activated SEV and the Ras1 activator SOS. We have investigated the possibility that DRK performs other functions by identifying additional DRK-binding proteins. We show that the phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain-containing protein Disabled (DAB) binds to the DRK SH3 domains. DAB is expressed in the ommatidial clusters, and loss of DAB function disrupts ommatidial development. Moreover, reduction of DAB function attenuates signaling by a constitutively activated SEV. Our biochemical analysis suggests that DAB binds SEV directly via its PTB domain, becomes tyrosine phosphorylated upon SEV activation, and then serves as an adaptor protein for SH2 domain-containing proteins. Taken together, these results indicate that DAB is a novel component of the SEV signaling pathway.     

Predicting Novel Features of Toll-Like Receptor 3 Signaling in Macrophages

The Toll-like receptor (TLR) 3 plays a critical role in mammalian innate immune response against viral attacks by recognizing double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) or its synthetic analog polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly (I∶C)). This leads to the activation of MAP kinases and NF-κB which results in the induction of type I interferons and proinflammatory cytokines to combat the viral infection. To understand the complex interplay of the various intracellular signaling molecules in the regulation of NF-κB and MAP kinases, we developed a computational TLR3 model based upon perturbation-response approach. We curated literature and databases to determine the TLR3 signaling topology specifically for murine macrophages. For initial model creation, we used wildtype temporal activation profiles of MAP kinases and NF-κB and, for model testing, used TRAF6 KO and TRADD KO data. From dynamic simulations we predict i) the existence of missing intermediary steps between extracellular poly (I∶C) stimulation and intracellular TLR3 binding, and ii) the presence of a novel pathway which is essential for JNK and p38, but not NF-κB, activation. Our work shows activation dynamics of signaling molecules can be used in conjunction with perturbation-response models to decipher novel signaling features of complicated immune pathways.     

Role of a Putative gp41 Dimerization Domain in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Membrane Fusion

The entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) into a target cell entails a series of conformational changes in the gp41 transmembrane glycoprotein that mediates the fusion of the viral and target cell membranes. A trimer-of-hairpins structure formed by the association of two heptad repeat (HR) regions of the gp41 ectodomain has been implicated in a late step of the fusion pathway. Earlier native and intermediate states of the protein are postulated to mediate the antiviral activity of the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide and of broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (NAbs), but the details of these structures remain unknown. Here, we report the identification and crystal structure of a dimerization domain in the C-terminal ectodomain of gp41 (residues 630 to 683, or C54). Two C54 monomers associate to form an asymmetric, antiparallel coiled coil with two distinct C-terminal α-helical overhangs. This dimer structure is conferred largely by interactions within a central core that corresponds to the sequence of enfuvirtide. The mutagenic alteration of the dimer interface severely impairs the infectivity of Env-pseudotyped viruses. Moreover, the C54 structure binds tightly to both the 2F5 and 4E10 NAbs and likely represents a potential intermediate conformation of gp41. These results should enhance our understanding of the molecular basis of the gp41 fusogenic structural transitions and thereby guide rational, structure-based efforts to design new fusion inhibitors and vaccine candidates intended to induce broadly neutralizing antibodies.The entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) into its target cell to establish an infection requires the fusion of viral and cellular membranes, a process that is mediated by the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env) through interactions with receptors on the target cell membrane (CD4 and a coreceptor, such as CCR-5 or CXCR-4) (14). HIV-1 Env is synthesized as the glycoprotein precursor gp160, which oligomerizes in the endoplasmic reticulum and subsequently is cleaved by the cellular furin endoprotease to create a metastable state that is primed for the induction of membrane fusion activity (19). The resulting Env complex is a trimeric structure comprising three gp120 surface glycoproteins, each associated noncovalently with one of three subunits of the gp41 transmembrane glycoprotein (24, 27, 47, 48). This native (prefusion) Env spike protrudes from the virus surface and is the target for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) (reviewed in reference 3). It is generally accepted that HIV-1 membrane fusion is promoted by a series of receptor binding-triggered conformational changes in the Env complex, culminating in the formation of an energetically stable trimer of α-helical hairpins in gp41 (10, 14).The core structure of the trimer-of-hairpins is an antiparallel six-helix bundle: a central, three-stranded coiled coil formed by the first heptad repeat (HR_N) region of gp41 is sheathed by three α-helices derived from the second HR (HR_C) (5, 27, 42, 44). HR_N is immediately C terminal to the fusion peptide, while HR_C is adjacent to the transmembrane helix anchored in the viral membrane. The interaction of gp120 with CD4 and a chemokine receptor is thought to alter intersubunit interactions in the native Env complex, leading to gp41 reorganization into a postulated prehairpin intermediate (reviewed in references 10 and 14). At this point, the N-terminal HR_N coiled-coil trimer is formed, relocating the fusion peptides to allow them to insert into the cellular membrane. The HR_C region then is thought to jackknife so as to pack against the inner coiled-coil core and form the postfusion trimer-of-hairpin structure that brings the attached target cell and viral membranes together. Evidence for the existence of these different gp41 conformational states in the fusion pathway is indirect, being inferred from the antiviral activity of peptides derived from the two HR regions of gp41 (20, 45). These peptide inhibitors likely act in a dominant-negative manner by binding to the prehairpin intermediate, preventing the formation of the trimer-of-hairpins (6, 13, 27, 31). This intermediate is relatively stable, with a half-life of many minutes, as detected by the capacity of such peptides to inhibit fusion once prefusion gp41 has undergone a conformational transition (21, 31). Although mounting evidence indicates that the prefusogenic and intermediate states are important targets for drug- and vaccine-elicited NAbs (reviewed in references 3 and 10), little is known about their structures and how they modulate gp41 fusogenicity or serve as targets for inhibition.The C-terminal part of the gp41 ectodomain consists of HR_C (or C34) and the membrane-proximal external region (MPER) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The C34 peptide is intrinsically disordered in isolation and forms an outer-layer α-helix only in the six-helix bundle (27, 29). Structural studies of the trimeric coiled-coil state of the MPER and of its bent helix conformation after binding to lipid membranes have begun to provide clues regarding the function of this unusual and important NAb-associated segment (25, 41). The MPER is the established target for two very rare but broadly reactive NAbs, 2F5 and 4E10/z13, which are elicited during natural human infection (50). These neutralizing epitopes seem to be poorly exposed on the surface of both HIV-1-infected cells and virions (reviewed in reference 3). Their exposure is enhanced or triggered by receptor binding but diminishes on the formation of the trimer-of-hairpins, suggesting that both of the NAbs target a more extended intermediate conformation rather than the native gp41 structure (8, 12). Despite extensive efforts, how structural aspects of the MPER explain its antigenicity and immunogenicity remains unclear. Here, we report the identification of the C-terminal dimerization domain of gp41 and present the 1.65-Å crystal structure of this domain. We characterize the role of this antiparallel two-stranded coiled-coil structure in NAb reactivity and viral function. Our study provides a potential structure for the fusion-intermediate state of gp41 and for the future design of new HIV-1 immunogens that may elicit broad and potent NAbs.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Structural and functional domains of HIV-1 gp41. (Upper) Schematic view of gp41 showing the location of the fusion peptide (FP), the two HR regions, the MPER, the transmembrane segment (TM), and the cytoplasmic region (CP). HR_C and MPER are depicted in blue and green, respectively. (Lower) Sequences of the C56, C54, C54_N656L, and C39 peptides employed in the study. The Asn-656→Leu mutation in C54_N656L is shown in red. The sequences of T-20 and core epitopes recognized by the human 2F5 and 4E10 MAbs are indicated.