Stimulatory effects of quinpirole hydrochloride, D2-dopamine receptor agonist, at low concentrations on prolactin release in female rats in vitro.

Dopamine (DA) has dual actions (inhibitory and stimulatory) in the regulation of prolactin (PRL) release, depending on its concentration. To investigate the stimulatory effects of DA, perifused rat anterior pituitary cells were exposed to the highly-specific DA D2 receptor agonist, quinpirole hydrochloride (LY). Very low concentrations of LY (10(-12)-10(-10) M) stimulated PRL release and potentiated thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH)-induced PRL release. Higher concentrations of LY did not stimulate. Pretreatment with pertussis toxin (30 ng/ml, 24 h) completely abolished these effects of LY. The D2 receptor antagonist, metoclopramide, also blocked the potentiation by LY of TRH-induced PRL release. These data indicate that very low concentrations of dopamine stimulate PRL release via an interaction with a D2 receptor connected to a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein.     

Catecholamines and pituitary function. III. Restoration of the prolactin response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone by low-dose dopamine infusion in women with pathological hyperprolactinemia

Previous studies in Rhesus monkeys have demonstrated that a dopamine (DA) infusion rate of 0.1 microgram/kg X min induces peripheral DA levels similar to those measured in hypophysial stalk blood and normalizes serum prolactin (PRL) levels in stalk-transected animals. We therefore examined the effect of such DA infusion rate on basal and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH)-stimulated PRL secretion in both normal cycling women and women with pathological hyperprolactinemia. 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA infusion fully normalized PRL serum levels in 8 normal cycling women whose endogenous catecholamine synthesis had been inhibited by alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT) pretreatment. Furthermore, DA significantly reduced, but did not abolish, the rise in serum PRL concentrations induced by both acute 500 mg AMPT administration and 200 micrograms intravenous TRH injection in normal women. A significant reduction in serum PRL levels in response to 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA, similar to that observed in normal cycling women when expressed as a percentage of baseline PRL, was documented in 13 amenorrheic patients with TRH-unresponsive pathological hyperprolactinemia. However, a marked rise was observed in the serum PRL of the same patients when TRH was administered during the course of a 0.1-microgram/kg X min DA infusion. The PRL response to TRH was significantly higher during DA than in basal conditions in hyperprolactinemic patients, irrespective of whether this was expressed as an absolute increase (delta PRL 94.4 +/- 14.2 vs. 17.8 +/- 14.1 ng/ml, p less than 0.002) or a percent increase (delta% PRL 155.4 +/- 18.9 vs. 17.9 +/- 7.1, p less than 0.0005), and there was a significant linear correlation between the PRL decrements induced by DA and the subsequent PRL responses to TRH. These data would seem to show that the 0.1-microgram/kg X min DA infusion rate reduces basal PRL secretion and blunts, but does not abolish, the PRL response to both TRH and acute AMPT administration. The strong reduction in PRL secretion and the restoration of the PRL response to TRH by 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA infusion in high majority of hyperprolactinemic patients, seem to indicate that both PRL hypersecretion and abnormal PRL response to TRH in women with pathological hyperprolactinemia are due to a relative DA deficiency at the DA receptor site of the pituitary lactotrophs.     

Catecholamines and pituitary function. VI. Effect of different dopamine doses on TRH-induced prolactin release in women with pathological hyperprolactinemia

The present study was designed to examine the effect of low-dose dopamine (DA) infusion rates (0.02 and 0.1 microgram/kg X min) on both basal and TRH-stimulated prolactin release in normal and hyperprolactinemic individuals. Sixteen normally menstruating women in the early follicular phase of a cycle and 23 hyperprolactinemic patients were studied. 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA was infused in 8 normal women and 15 patients with pathological hyperprolactinemia, while 8 normal controls and 8 patients received 0.02 microgram/kg X min DA TRH (200 micrograms, i.v.) was administered alone and at the 180th min of the 5-hour DA infusion in all controls and patients. A significant reduction in serum PRL levels, which was similar in normal women (-59.5 +/- 4.0%, mean +/- SE) and hyperprolactinemic patients (-48.2 +/- 5.5) was observed in response to 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA. In normal cycling women DA infusion significantly (P less than 0.02) reduced the PRL response to TRH with respect to the basal TRH test (delta PRL 45.0 +/- 7.0 vs. 77.9 +/- 15.4 ng/ml). On the contrary, the PRL response to TRH was significantly higher during 0.1 microgram/kg X min DA than in basal conditions in hyperprolactinemic patients, both in absolute (delta PRL 91.8 +/- 17.6 vs. 38.4 +/- 6.8, P less than 0.03) and per cent (198.5 +/- 67.6 vs. 32.1 +/- 7.5, P less than 0.02) values. A normal PRL response to TRH, arbitrarily defined as an increase greater than 100% of baseline, was restored in 11 out of 15 previously unresponsive hyperprolactinemic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Growth hormone, thyrotropin and prolactin responses to simultaneous administration of human growth hormone-releasing factor and thyrotropin releasing hormone in the bovine

The effects of intravenous injection of synthetic human pancreatic growth hormone-releasing factor-44-NH2 (hpGRF-44) and synthetic thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH), or hpGRF-44 in combination with TRH on growth hormone (GH), thyrotropin (TSH), and prolactin (PRL) release in dairy female calves (6- and 12-month-old) were studied. When 0.25 microgram of hpGRF-44 per kg of body weight (bw) was injected in combination with TRH (1.0 microgram per kg of bw), the mean plasma GH concentration of the 12-month-old calves rose to a maximum level of 191.5 ng/ml (P less than 0.001) at 15 min from the value of 6.8 ng/ml before injection at 0 min. The maximum level was 3.1 and 6.1 times as high as the peak values obtained after injection of hpGRF-44 (0.25 microgram per kg of bw) and TRH (1.0 microgram per kg of bw), respectively (P less than 0.001). The area under the GH response curve for the 12-month-old calves for 3 hr after injection of hpGRF-44 in combination with TRH was 2.5 times as large as the sum of the areas obtained by hpGRF-44 and TRH injections. In contrast, the mean plasma GH level was unchanged in saline injected calves. The magnitudes of the first and the second plasma GH responses in the 6-month-old calves to two consecutive injections of hpGRF-44 in combination with TRH at a 3-hr interval were very similar. The peak values of plasma GH in the calves after hpGRF-44 injection were 2-4 times as high as those after TRH injection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of the dopamine agonist cabergoline on the pulsatile and TRH-induced secretion of prolactin, LH, and testosterone in male beagle dogs

In the present study, the pulsatile serum profiles of prolactin, LH and testosterone were investigated in eight clinically healthy fertile male beagles of one to six years of age. Serum hormone concentrations were determined in blood samples collected at 15 min intervals over a period of 6 h before (control) and six days before the end of a four weeks treatment with the dopamine agonist cabergoline (5 microg kg(-1) bodyweight/day). In addition, the effect of cabergoline administration was investigated on thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH)-induced changes in the serum concentrations of these hormones. In all eight dogs, the serum prolactin concentrations (mean 3.0 +/- 0.3 ng ml(-1)) were on a relatively constant level not showing any pulsatility, while the secretion patterns of LH and testosterone were characterised by several hormone pulses. Cabergoline administration caused a minor but significant reduction of the mean prolactin concentration (2.9 +/- 0.2 ng ml(-1), p < 0.05) and did not affect the secretion of LH (mean 4.6 +/- 1.3 ng ml(-1) versus 4.4 +/- 1.7 ng ml(-1)) or testosterone (2.5 +/- 0.9 ng ml(-1) versus 2.4 +/- 1.2 ng ml(-1)). Under control conditions, a significant prolactin release was induced by intravenous TRH administration (before TRH: 3.8 +/- 0.9 ng ml(-1), 20 min after TRH: 9.1 +/- 5.9 ng ml(-1)) demonstrating the role of TRH as potent prolactin releasing factor. This prolactin increase was almost completely suppressed under cabergoline medication (before TRH: 3.0 +/- 0.2 ng ml(-1), 20 min after TRH: 3.3 +/- 0.5 ng ml(-1)). The concentrations of LH and testosterone were not affected by TRH administration. The results of these studies suggest that dopamine agonists mainly affect suprabasal secretion of prolactin in the dog.     

Oral thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) test in acromegaly

The effects of 40 mg oral and 200 microgram intravenous TRH were studied in patients with active acromegaly. Administration of oral TRH to each of 14 acromegalics resulted in more pronounced TSH response in all patients and more pronounced response of triiodothyronine in most of them (delta max TSh after oral TRh 36.4 +/- 10.0 (SEM) mU/l vs. delta max TSH after i.v. TRH 7.7 +/- 1.5 mU/l, P less than 0.05; delta max T3 after oral TRH 0.88 +/- 0.24 nmol/vs. delta max T3 after i.v. TRH 0.23 +/- 0.06 nmol/l, P less than 0.05). Oral TRH elicited unimpaired TSH response even in those acromegalics where the TSH response to i.v. TRH was absent or blunted. In contrast to TSH stimulation, oral TRH did not elicit positive paradoxical growth hormone response in any of 8 patients with absent stimulation after i.v. TRH. In 7 growth hormone responders to TRH stimulation the oral TRH-induced growth hormone response was insignificantly lower than that after i.v. TRH (delta max GH after oral TRH 65.4 +/- 28.1 microgram/l vs. delta max GH after i.v. TRH 87.7 +/- 25.6 microgram/l, P greater than 0.05). In 7 acromegalics 200 microgram i.v. TRH represented a stronger stimulus for prolactin release than 40 mg oral TRH (delta max PRL after i.v. TRH 19.6 +/- 3.22 microgram/, delta max PRL after oral TRH 11.1 +/- 2.02 microgram/, P less than 0.05). Conclusion: In acromegalics 40 mg oral TRH stimulation is useful in the evaluation of the function of pituitary thyrotrophs because it shows more pronounced effect than 200 microgram TRH intravenously. No advantage of oral TRH stimulation was seen in the assessment of prolactin stimulation and paradoxical growth hormone responses.     

Hormonal regulation of prolactin release by human prolactinoma cells cultured in serum-free conditions

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) stimulates the prolactin (PRL) release from normal lactotrophs or tumoral cell line GH3. This effect is not observed in many patients with PRL-secreting tumors. We examined in vitro the PRL response to TRH on cultured human PRL-secreting tumor cells (n = 10) maintained on an extracellular matrix in a minimum medium (DME + insulin, transferrin, selenium). Addition of 10(-8) M TRH to 4 X 10(4) cells produced either no stimulation of PRL release (n = 6) or a mild PRL rise of 32 +/- (SE) 11% (n = 4) when measured 1, 2 and 24 h after TRH addition. When tumor cells were preincubated for 24 h with 5 X 10(-11) M bromocriptine, a 47 +/- 4% inhibition of PRL release was obtained. When TRH (10(-8) M) was added, 24 h after bromocriptine, it produced a 85 +/- 25% increase of PRL release (n = 8). This stimulation of PRL release was evident when measured 1 h after TRH addition and persisted for 48 h. The half maximal stimulatory effect of TRH was 2 X 10(-10) M and the maximal effect was achieved at 10(-9) M TRH. When tumor cells were pretreated with various concentrations of triiodothyronine (T3), the PRL release was inhibited by 50% with 5 X 10(-11) M T3 and by 80% with 10(-9) M T3. Successive addition of TRH (10(-8) M) was unable to stimulate PRL release at any concentration of T3. The addition of 10(-8) M estradiol for up to 16 days either stimulated or had no effect upon the PRL basal release according to the cases. In all cases tested (n = 4), preincubation of the tumor cells with estradiol (10(-8) M) modified the inhibition of PRL release induced by bromocriptine with a half-inhibitory concentration displaced from 3 X 10(-11) M (control) to 3 X 10(-10) M (estradiol). These data demonstrate that the absence of TRH effect observed in some human prolactinomas is not linked to the absence of TRH receptor in such tumor cells. TRH responsiveness is always restored in the presence of dopamine (DA) at appropriate concentration. This TRH/DA interaction seems specific while not observed under T3 inhibition of PRL. Furthermore, estrogens, while presenting a variable stimulatory effect upon basal PRL, antagonize the dopaminergic inhibition of PRL release.     

Paradoxical growth hormone response following thyroid-stimulating hormone administration in the polycystic ovary syndrome

Growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) responses after TRH administration were studied in 31 women presenting with the clinical, biochemical and ultrasonographic characteristics of the polycystic ovarian (PCO) syndrome; their results were compared with those of 20 normally menstruating women investigated during the early follicular phase of the cycle. Based on the GH responses two PCO subgroups were observed: (a) nonresponders (n = 16) who showed delta max GH responses (0.7 +/- 0.27 ng/ml, x +/- SE) similar to those of the normals (0.97 +/- 0.20 ng/ml), and (b) responders (n = 15), 48.4% of the PCO patients who showed a paradoxical increase in GH levels (delta max GH, 18.0 +/- 1.96 ng/ml) following thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) administration significantly higher than those observed either in nonresponder PCO patients or in normals. Furthermore, basal GH levels were found to be significantly higher in the responder PCO subgroup (5.65 +/- 0.75 ng/ml) compared to either nonresponders (1.58 +/- 0.21 ng/ml) or normals (1.8 +/- 0.18 ng/ml). However, no correlation was found between basal GH levels and delta max GH responses observed. Additionally, basal PRL and delta max PRL levels following TRH administration did not differ either between the two PCO subgroups or those observed in normal controls. delta 4A, T and E2 levels were similar between the two PCO subgroups. No correlation was found between the delta max GH responses to delta max PRL or the post-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone stimulation test delta max luteinizing hormone:follicle-stimulating hormone ratio observed or to steroid levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of transient dopamine antagonism on thyrotropin-releasing hormone-induced prolactin release in female rats during the estrous cycle

Prolactin (PRL) release induced by TRH was examined on each day of the estrous cycle in female rats in which pituitary dopamine (DA) receptors were blocked pharmacologically. The objective was to determine if an interaction exists between hypothalamic inhibitory and releasing hormones with regard to prolactin (PRL) secretion. Domperidone (0.01 mg/rat i.v.) followed 5 minutes later by the administration of the DA agonist 2-Br-alpha-ergocryptine maleate (CB-154, 0.5 mg/rat i.v.) were used to produce a transient (less than 1 hr) dopamine blockade. One hour later, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH, 1.0 microgram/rat i.v.) was given to stimulate PRL release. On the morning of proestrus, TRH released a significantly greater quantity of PRL into the plasma after DA antagonism compared to control animals which did not receive the dopamine antagonist. Dopamine antagonism also enhanced the effectiveness of TRH on the mornings of estrus and metestrus. The response on estrus was significantly greater than the response on proestrus. However by the morning of diestrus, TRH-"releasable" PRL was greatly diminished. Our results suggest that DA antagonism is able to shift differing quantities of PRL into a TRH "releasable" pool on several days of the estrous cycle and that the control of this mechanism is acute.     

Effects of VIP, TRH, GABA and dopamine on prolactin release from superfused rat anterior pituitary cells

Effects of VIP, TRH, dopamine and GABA on the secretion of prolactin (PRL) from rat pituitary cells were studied in vitro with a sensitive superfusion method. Dispersed anterior pituitary cells were placed on a Sephadex G-25 column and continuously eluted with KRBG buffer. Infusion of TRH (10(-11) - 10(-8)M) and VIP (10(-9) - 10(-6)M) resulted in a dose-related increase in PRL release. LHRH (10(-8) - 10(-5)M) had no effect on PRL release. On the other hand, infusion of dopamine (10(-9) - 10(-6)M) and GABA (10(-8) - 10(-4)M) suppressed not only the basal PRL release from dispersed pituitary cells but also the PRL response to TRH and VIP. The potency of TRH to stimulate PRL release is greater than that of VIP, and the potency of dopamine to inhibit PRL secretion is stronger than that of GABA on a molar basis. These results indicate that TRH and VIP have a stimulating role whereas dopamine and GABA have an inhibitory role in the regulation of PRL secretion at the pituitary level in the rat.     

Monolayer cultures of dispersed cells from bovine anterior pituitary: responses to synthetic hypophysiotropic peptides.

Cells were dispersed from bovine anterior pituitary glands, by digestion with collagenase, and cultured. After 4 days the cell monolayers were incubated with fresh medium containing synthetic hypophysiotropic peptides for 2, 6, or 20 h, and hormone released into the medium was estimated by radioimmunoassay. After 2 h, thyroid releasing hormone (TRH) stimulated the release of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) up to eightfold, and of prolactin (PRL) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) about twofold at a minimal effective concentration of 1 ng/ml; enhanced growth hormone (GH) release was not apparent until 20 h, and release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) was unaffected. Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) enhanced release of LH maximally (three- to fourfold) during a 2 h incubation and was effective at 0.1 ng/ml; FSH release was significantly enhanced by about 50% above control level. Growth hormone release inhibiting hormone (GH-RIH)(somatostatin) showed significant effects only in the 20 h incubation; GH release was inhibited by 50% and release of PRL was slightly, but significantly, enhanced. Pituitary cell monolayers apparently permit maximal expression of releasing activities inherent in the hypothalamic hormones.     

A comparison of the effects of suckling or transient dopamine antagonism on thyrotropin-releasing hormone and suckling induced prolactin release in lactating rats

Prolactin (PRL) release was studied in mid-lactational female rats by comparing the stimulatory influence of suckling to a drug protocol that mimics the effect of suckling on the anterior pituitary (AP). Animals that nursed pups for 15 minutes and were allowed to suckle again 60 minutes later for 10 minutes, released PRL effectively during both nursing episodes; however, in animals that received the dopamine (DA) agonist 2-Br-alpha-ergocryptine maleate (CB-154, 0.5 mg/rat i.v.) at the end of the first nursing period did not show an increase in plasma PRL to a second suckling stimulation by the pups. When thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) was substituted for the second suckling period in CB-154 treated rats, a slight increase in plasma PRL occurred 5 minutes after the injection. In a third study we transiently blocked the action of DA at the AP by injecting the DA antagonist domperidone (0.01 mg/rat i.v.), followed 5 minutes later by the administration of CB-154. One hour later animals were either allowed to suckle pups for 10 minutes or were injected with TRH. Treatment with TRH resulted in an 11 fold increase in plasma PRL but suckling was completely ineffective in inducing PRL release. These data suggest that the lack of PRL release to suckling in CB-154 treated rats was due to inhibitory effects of CB-154 on neural mechanisms which link nursing to PRL release. In addition, the data show that pharmacologic DA antagonism affects TRH releasable PRL more than does suckling. This may be due to a reduction, by suckling, of the pool of PRL that is available to be released by TRH administration.     

The effects of dopaminergic antagonism by sulpiride on TRH and VIP-induced prolactin release in nonsuckled lactating rats

Prolactin (PRL) release was studied in female rats during midlactation using pharmacologic manipulations designed to mimic the hypothalamic effects of suckling. In the first experiment pituitary dopamine (DA) receptors were blocked by sulpiride (10 micrograms/rat i.v.). One hour later, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH, 1.0 micrograms/rat i.v.) was given to induce PRL release. TRH released significantly more PRL following DA antagonism than when no DA antagonism was produced, suggesting that DA receptor blockade increased the sensitivity of the AP to TRH. In a second experiment, VIP (25 micrograms/rat) increased plasma prolactin 3-4 fold but this effect was not enhanced significantly by prior dopamine antagonism with sulpiride. We conclude that dopamine antagonism enhances the PRL releasing effect of TRH but not VIP in lactating rats.     

The effect of aging on prolactin secretion in rat pituitary monolayer culture.

A high basal rate of prolactin (PRL) secretion (.16±.03 μg/well/hr) was produced for over four weeks by pre-confluent male rat pituitary monolayer cell cultures. When the media was changed, a rapid release of microgram quantities of PRL occurred followed by a return to the basal PRL secretory rate by seven hours. Theophylline (3.8×10^?3M), but not dibutyrl cAMP (1×10^?3M), produced a significant (p<.02) increase in PRL secretion, and simultaneous addition of these agents potentiated the PRL secretory rate. TRH (2×10^?8M) had no effect on PRL release by six hours, whereas dopamine (4.9×10^?5M) produced a significant suppression (p<.002) of PRL secretion. In addition, the effects of theophylline, TRH, and dopamine on PRL secretion were similar in cultures of various ages. Ovine prolactin in concentrations up to 50 μg per ml produced no change in PRL secretion during 72 hours of incubation suggesting that PRL feedback control of its own secretion may be transmitted via the hypothalamus. These studies show that a high rate of PRL secretion can be maintained by pre-confluent monolayer cultures for extended periods of time, permitting repeated experimentation on the same wells.     

Effect of triiodothyronine administration on the plasma TSH and prolactin responses to TRH in patients with hypothalamic-pituitary insufficiency.

A study was carried out in 10 patients with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies to determine the response of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and prolactin (PRL) to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and their suppressibility by treatment with triiodothyronine (T3) given at a dose of 60 microgram/day for 1 week. In 3 patients the basal tsh values were normal and in 7 patients, 2 of whom had not received regular thyroid replacement therapy, they were elevated. The response of TSH to TRH was normal in 6 patients and exaggerated in 4 (of these, 1 patient had not received previous substitution therapy and 2 had received only irregular treatment). The basal and stimulated levels of TSH were markedly suppressed by the treatment with T3. The basal PRL levels were normal in 7 and slightly elevated in 3 patients. The response of PRL to TRH stimulation was exaggerated in 2, normal in 6 and absent in 2 patients. The basal PRL levels were not suppressible by T3 treatment but in 4 patients this treatment reduced the PRL response to TRH stimulation. From these findings the following conclusions are drawn: (1) T3 suppresses TSH at the pituitary level, and (2) the hyperreactivity of TSH to TRH and the low set point of suppressibility are probably due to a lack of TRH in the type of patients studied.     

The pharmacologic induction of prolactin release in the medial preoptic/suprachiasmatic nuclei-lesioned, estrogen-treated ovariectomized rat

It has been shown that lesions of the medial preoptic/suprachiasmatic nuclei (MPO/SCN) abolish the estrogen-induced afternoon prolactin (PRL) surge. Recent studies using both dopamine antagonist and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) successfully induced an increase in plasma PRL in various animal models. The same drug approach was used in this study in the MPO/SCN lesioned rat to determine whether these areas participated in the induced PRL release. It is concluded that a significant PRL release can be induced by DA antagonism, or TRH stimulation preceded by DA antagonism in the MPO/SCN lesioned, estrogen-treated ovariectomized rat.     

Thyroid stimulating hormone and prolactin secretion: reduced sensitivity to TRH-stimulated prolactin release after midpregnancy in rats

Prolactin (PRL) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) plasma concentrations were measured during the latter part of the dark period in early and mid-late pregnancy in the rat. On Days 4-5 and 7-8 of pregnancy, plasma PRL concentrations surged between 22:00 and 06:00 hr and TSH values increased between 22:00 and 02:00 hr. While the TSH pattern was maintained during the second-half of pregnancy, surges in PRL release ceased and PRL levels remained at less than 10 ng/ml. The effects of thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) administration on PRL and TSH secretion were then measured to determine whether the second-half of pregnancy is associated with a decrease in sensitivity to an agent that can stimulate PRL release. Injection (iv) of cannulated pregnant rats with a low dosage (20 ng) of TRH stimulated a twofold increase in plasma TSH during both early (Days 5-9) and later (Days 14-18) pregnancy but did not change plasma PRL levels. Treatment with a high dosage (2 micrograms) of TRH induced a sixfold rise in plasma TSH during both phases of gestation. The higher dose of TRH also stimulated elevations in plasma PRL during early and mid-late pregnancy; however, both the absolute increase in the amount of PRL in plasma and the percentage increase over baseline levels were greater from Days 5-9 than from Days 14-16 of gestation. These data indicate that the neuroendocrine sensitivity to factors that stimulate PRL secretion changes as pregnancy progresses, and suggest that nocturnal secretion of PRL and TSH during pregnancy may be regulated, in part, by a common trophic factor.     

Stimulation of growth hormone release in dwarf and normal chickens by thyrotrophin releasing hormone (TRH) or human pancreatic growth hormone releasing factor (hpGRF)

The effect of thyrotrophin releasing hormone (TRH) or human pancreatic growth hormone releasing factor (hpGRF) on growth hormone (GH) release was studied in both dwarf and normal Rhode Island Red chickens with a similar genotype except for a sex-linked dw gene. Both TRH (10 micrograms/kg) and hpGRF (20 micrograms/kg) injections stimulated plasma GH release within 15 min in young and adult chickens. The increase in GH release was higher in young cockerels than that in adult chickens. The age-related decline in the response to TRH stimulation was observed in both strains, while hpGRF was a still potent GH-releaser in adult chickens. The maximal and long acting response was observed in young dwarf chickens, suggesting differences in GH pools releasable by TRH and GRF in the anterior pituitary gland. The pituitary gland was stimulated directly by perifusion with hpGRF (1 microgram/ml and 10 micrograms/ml) or TRH (1 microgram/ml). Repeated perifusion of GRF at 40 min intervals blunted further increase in GH release, but successive perifusion with TRH stimulated GH release. The results suggest the possibility that desensitization to the effects of hpGRF occurs in vitro and that the extent of response depends on the number of receptors for hpGRF or TRH and/or the amount of GH stored in the pituitary gland.     

Prolactin and thyrotropin response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in premenopausal women with fibrocystic disease of the breast

Plasma PRL, TSH, total and free T4, total and free T3, and 17 beta-estradiol were evaluated in 29 premenopausal women with well-documented fibrocystic disease of the breast and in 29 healthy matched controls. Plasma PRL and TSH dynamics after acute TRH injection (200 micrograms i.v.) were also determined. All hormonal measurements were performed in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Neither patients nor controls showed any thyroid function impairment. Basal plasma levels of the examined hormones were in the normal range in both groups. When considering data pertinent to PRL and TSH secretory patterns after TRH stimulation, no difference was recorded between patients and controls for TSH secretion, evaluated in terms of maximum peak, net (delta) and percent (delta %) increase above the baseline level and integrated area of response. On the contrary, the response of PRL was significantly higher in patients than controls (maximum peak at 20 min, mean +/- SE, 119.9 +/- 14.1 vs. 60.8 +/- 5.5 ng/ml, p less than 0.001; integrated area of response, 5,725 +/- 908 vs. 3,243 +/- 266 ng/ml/120 min, p less than 0.01). The results are compatible with the view that, in most patients with fibrocystic disease of the breast, there are abnormalities in the control of PRL secretion, which lead to enhanced release of the hormone after stimulation. In such cases the control of TSH appears to be operating normally.     

Stimulatory action of prolactin on gonadotropin secretion in vitro

The action of prolactin (PRL) on the secretion of gonadotropin was investigated by means of a cell culture system of rat anterior pituitary gland. Anterior pituitary glands were removed from Wistar male rats, enzymatically digested and cultured. Luteinizing hormone (LH) release into medium was increased by adding PRL dose-dependently in the range between 10 ng/ml and 1 microgram/ml. This effect of PRL was further augmented by the presence of either gonadotropin-releasing hormone or estradiol. The intracellular LH concentration was also increased by PRL. PRL also caused an increase in follicle-stimulating hormone release into medium dose-dependently. In conclusion, PRL was shown to stimulate the secretion of gonadotropin at the pituitary level, thus suggesting a paracrine mode of PRL action in the anterior pituitary gland.