Exchange of histidine spacing between Sp1 and GLI zinc fingers: distinct effect of histidine spacing-linker region on DNA binding

In the DNA recognition mode of C(2)H(2)-type zinc fingers, the finger-finger connection region, consisting of the histidine spacing (HX(3-5)H) and linker, would be important for determining the orientation of the zinc finger domains. To clarify the influence of spacing between two ligand histidines in the DNA binding, we exchanged the histidine spacing between Sp1 and GLI zinc fingers, which have an HX(3)H-TGEKK linker (typical) and an HX(4)H-SNEKP linker (atypical), respectively. A significant decrease in the DNA binding affinity and specificity is found in Sp1-type peptides, whereas GLI-type peptides show a mild reduction. To evaluate the effect of the linker characteristics, we further designed Sp1-type mutants with an SNEKP linker. As a result, the significant effect of the histidine spacing in Sp1-type peptides was reduced. These results demonstrate that (1) the histidine spacing significantly affects the DNA binding of zinc finger proteins and (2) the histidine spacing and the following linker regions are one effective target for regulating the DNA recognition mode of zinc finger proteins.     

Finger-positional change in three zinc finger protein Sp1: influence of terminal finger in DNA recognition

The connection of functional modules is effective for the design of DNA binding molecules with the desired sequence specificity. C(2)H(2)-type zinc finger proteins have a tandemly repeated array structure consisting of independent finger modules and are expected to recognize any DNA sequences by permutation, multi-connection, and the substitution of various sets of zinc fingers. To investigate the effects of the replacement of the terminal finger on the DNA recognition by other fingers, we have constructed the three zinc finger peptides with finger substitution at the N- or C-terminus, Sp1(zf223), Sp1(zf323), and Sp1(zf321). From the results of gel mobility shift assays, each mutant peptide binds preferentially to the target sequence that is predicted if the fingers act in a modular fashion. The methylation interference analyses demonstrate that in the cases of the N-terminal finger substitution mutants, Sp1(zf223) and Sp1(zf323), the N-terminal finger recognizes bases to different extents from that of the wild-type peptide, Sp1(zf123). Of special interest is the fact that the N-terminal finger of the C-terminal finger substitution mutant, Sp1(zf321), shows a distinct base recognition from those of Sp1(zf123) and Sp1(zf323). DNase I footprinting analyses indicate that the C-terminal finger (active finger) induces a conformational change in the DNA in the region for the binding of the N-terminal finger (passive finger). The present results strongly suggest that the extent of base recognition of the N-terminal finger is dominated by the binding of the C-terminal finger. This information provides an important clue for the creation of a zinc finger peptide with the desired specificity, which is applicable to the design of novel drugs and biological tools.     

Validated zinc finger protein designs for all 16 GNN DNA triplet targets.

The Cys(2)-His(2)-type zinc finger DNA-binding proteins can be engineered to bind specifically to many different DNA sequences. A single zinc finger typically binds to a 3-4-base pair DNA subsite. One strategy for design is to identify highly specific fingers that recognize each of the 64 possible DNA triplets. We started with a subgroup of the 64 triplets, the GNN-binding fingers. The GNN-binding fingers have been examined in several studies, but previous studies did not produce specific fingers for all of the 16 GNN triplets. These previous studies did not provide any information on the possible positional or context effects on the performance of these fingers. To identify the most specific design and take the possible positional effects into consideration, we did a large-scale site selection experiment on our GNN designs. From this study, we identified very specific fingers for 14 of the 16 GNN triplets, demonstrating for the first time a clear positional dependence for many of the designs. Further systematic specificity study reveals that the in vivo functionality of these zinc finger proteins in a reporter assay depends on their binding affinities to their target sequences, thus giving a better understanding of how these zinc finger proteins might function inside cells.     

Exploiting the recognition code for elucidating the mechanism of zinc finger protein-DNA interactions

Background

Engineering zinc finger protein motifs for specific binding to double-stranded DNA is critical for targeted genome editing. Most existing tools for predicting DNA-binding specificity in zinc fingers are trained on data obtained from naturally occurring proteins, thereby skewing the predictions. Moreover, these mostly neglect the cooperativity exhibited by zinc fingers.

Methods

Here, we present an ab-initio method that is based on mutation of the key α-helical residues of individual fingers of the parent template for Zif-268 and its consensus sequence (PDB ID: 1AAY). In an attempt to elucidate the mechanism of zinc finger protein-DNA interactions, we evaluated and compared three approaches, differing in the amino acid mutations introduced in the Zif-268 parent template, and the mode of binding they try to mimic, i.e., modular and synergistic mode of binding.

Results

Comparative evaluation of the three strategies reveals that the synergistic mode of binding appears to mimic the ideal mechanism of DNA-zinc finger protein binding. Analysis of the predictions made by all three strategies indicate strong dependence of zinc finger binding specificity on the amino acid propensity and the position of a 3-bp DNA sub-site in the target DNA sequence. Moreover, the binding affinity of the individual zinc fingers was found to increase in the order Finger 1 < Finger 2 < Finger 3, thus confirming the cooperative effect.

Conclusions

Our analysis offers novel insights into the prediction of ZFPs for target DNA sequences and the approaches have been made available as an easy to use web server at http://web.iitd.ac.in/~sundar/zifpredict_ihbe

     

Keep Your Fingers Off My DNA: Protein–Protein Interactions Mediated by C2H2 Zinc Finger Domains

Cys2-His2 (C2H2) zinc finger domains (ZFs) were originally identified as DNA-binding domains, and uncharacterized domains are typically assumed to function in DNA binding. However, a growing body of evidence suggests an important and widespread role for these domains in protein binding. There are even examples of zinc fingers that support both DNA and protein interactions, which can be found in well-known DNA-binding proteins such as Sp1, Zif268, and Ying Yang 1 (YY1). C2H2 protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are proving to be more abundant than previously appreciated, more plastic than their DNA-binding counterparts, and more variable and complex in their interactions surfaces. Here we review the current knowledge of over 100 C2H2 zinc finger-mediated PPIs, focusing on what is known about the binding surface, contributions of individual fingers to the interaction, and function. An accurate understanding of zinc finger biology will likely require greater insights into the potential protein interaction capabilities of C2H2 ZFs.     

Swapping of the beta-hairpin region between Sp1 and GLI zinc fingers: significant role of the beta-hairpin region in DNA binding properties of C2H2-type zinc finger peptides

The recent design strategy of zinc finger peptides has mainly focused on the alpha-helix region, which plays a direct role in DNA recognition. On the other hand, the study of non-DNA-contacting regions is extremely scarce. By swapping the beta-hairpin regions between the Sp1 and GLI zinc fingers, in this study, we investigated how the beta-hairpin region of the C(2)H(2)-type zinc finger peptides contributes to the DNA binding properties. Surprisingly, the Sp1 mutant with the GLI-type beta-hairpin had a higher DNA binding affinity than that of the wild-type Sp1. The result of the DNase I footprinting analyses also showed the change in the DNA binding pattern. In contrast, the GLI zinc finger completely lost DNA binding ability as a result of exchanging the beta-hairpin region. These results strongly indicate that the beta-hairpin region appears to function as a scaffold and has an important effect on the DNA binding properties of the C(2)H(2)-type zinc finger peptides.     

Interconversion between serine and aspartic acid in the alpha helix of the N-terminal zinc finger of Sp1: implication for general recognition code and for design of novel zinc finger peptide recognizing complementary strand

In the typical base recognition mode of the C(2)H(2)-type zinc finger, the amino acid residues at alpha-helical positions -1, 3, and 6 make a contact with the base in one strand (the primary strand), and the residue at position 2 interacts with the base in a complementary strand (the secondary strand). The N-terminal zinc finger of the three-zinc-finger domain of Sp1 has inherently a unique five-base-pair binding mode in which the guanine bases are recognized in both strands. To clarify the effect of the amino acid at position 2 on DNA binding affinity and base specificity, we have created a library of the mutants by the interconversion between serine and aspartic acid in the N-terminal zinc finger of Sp1 and recombinant variants of finger order. Gel mobility shift and methylation interference assays showed that the combination of arginine and serine at positions -1 and 2, respectively, provides a newly strong guanine contact in the secondary strand and a higher binding affinity than that of wild-type Sp1. Of special interest are the facts that the mutant with lysine and aspartic acid at positions -1 and 2 in the alpha helix predominantly recognizes the bases in the secondary strand and that its DNA binding affinity is higher than that of the wild-type. The aspartic acid or serine at position 2 independently contributes to the DNA binding affinity and base specificity. The present results provide useful information for the design of a novel zinc finger protein with priority for the bases in the secondary strand.     

Combining structure-based design with phage display to create new Cys(2)His(2) zinc finger dimers

BACKGROUND: Several strategies have been reported for the design and selection of novel DNA-binding proteins. Most of these studies have used Cys(2)His(2) zinc finger proteins as a framework, and have focused on constructs that bind DNA in a manner similar to Zif268, with neighboring fingers connected by a canonical (Krüppel-type) linker. This linker does not seem ideal for larger constructs because only modest improvements in affinity are observed when more than three fingers are connected in this manner. Two strategies have been described that allow the productive assembly of more than three canonically linked fingers on a DNA site: connecting sets of fingers using linkers (covalent), or assembling sets of fingers using dimerization domains (non-covalent). RESULTS: Using a combination of structure-based design and phage display, we have developed a new dimerization system for Cys(2)His(2) zinc fingers that allows the assembly of more than three fingers on a desired target site. Zinc finger constructs employing this new dimerization system have high affinity and good specificity for their target sites both in vitro and in vivo. Constructs that recognize an asymmetric binding site as heterodimers can be obtained through substitutions in the zinc finger and dimerization regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our modular zinc finger dimerization system allows more than three Cys(2)His(2) zinc fingers to be productively assembled on a DNA-binding site. Dimerization may offer certain advantages over covalent linkage for the recognition of large DNA sequences. Our results also illustrate the power of combining structure-based design with phage display in a strategy that assimilates the best features of each method.