Chemo- and opto-genetic tools for dissecting the role of membrane contact sites in living cells: Recent advances and limitations

Membrane contact sites (MCSs) are morphologically defined intracellular structures where cellular membranes are closely apposed. Recent progress has significantly advanced our understanding of MCSs with the use of new tools and techniques. Visualization of MCSs in living cells by split fluorescence proteins or FRET-based techniques tells us the dynamic property of MCSs. Manipulation of MCSs by chemically-induced dimerization (CID) or light-induced dimerization (LID) greatly contributes to our understanding of their functional aspects including inter-organelle lipid transport mediated by lipid transfer proteins (LTPs). Here we highlight recent advances in these tools and techniques as applied to MCSs, and we discuss their advantages and limitations.     

Mdm1/Snx13 is a novel ER–endolysosomal interorganelle tethering protein

Although endolysosomal trafficking is well defined, how it is regulated and coordinates with cellular metabolism is unclear. To identify genes governing endolysosomal dynamics, we conducted a global fluorescence-based screen to reveal endomembrane effector genes. Screening implicated Phox (PX) domain–containing protein Mdm1 in endomembrane dynamics. Surprisingly, we demonstrate that Mdm1 is a novel interorganelle tethering protein that localizes to endoplasmic reticulum (ER)–vacuole/lysosome membrane contact sites (MCSs). We show that Mdm1 is ER anchored and contacts the vacuole surface in trans via its lipid-binding PX domain. Strikingly, overexpression of Mdm1 induced ER–vacuole hypertethering, underscoring its role as an interorganelle tether. We also show that Mdm1 and its paralogue Ydr179w-a (named Nvj3 in this study) localize to ER–vacuole MCSs independently of established tether Nvj1. Finally, we find that Mdm1 truncations analogous to neurological disease–associated SNX14 alleles fail to tether the ER and vacuole and perturb sphingolipid metabolism. Our work suggests that human Mdm1 homologues may play previously unappreciated roles in interorganelle communication and lipid metabolism.     

STIM1 Is a Novel Component of ER-Chlamydia trachomatis Inclusion Membrane Contact Sites

Productive developmental cycle of the obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis depends on the interaction of the replicative vacuole, named the inclusion, with cellular organelles. We have recently reported the formation of ER-Inclusion membrane contact sites (MCSs), where the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is in apposition to the inclusion membrane. These platforms contain the C. trachomatis inclusion membrane protein IncD, the mammalian ceramide transfer protein CERT and the ER resident proteins VAPA/B and were proposed to play a role in the non-vesicular trafficking of lipids to the inclusion. Here, we identify STIM1 as a novel component of ER-Inclusion MCSs. STIM1, an ER calcium (Ca²⁺) sensor that relocate to ER-Plasma Membrane (PM) MCSs upon Ca²⁺ store depletion, associated with C. trachomatis inclusion. STIM1, but not the general ER markers Rtn3C and Sec61ß, was enriched at the inclusion membrane. Ultra-structural studies demonstrated that STIM1 localized to ER-Inclusion MCSs. Time-course experiments showed that STIM1, CERT and VAPB co-localized throughout the developmental cycle. By contrast, Orai1, the PM Ca²⁺ channel that interacts with STIM1 at ER-PM MCSs, did not associate with C. trachomatis inclusion. Upon ER Ca²⁺ store depletion, a pool of STIM1 relocated to ER-PM MCSs, while the existing ER-Inclusion MCSs remained enriched in STIM1. Finally, we have identified the CAD domain, which mediates STIM1-Orai1 interaction, as the minimal domain required for STIM1 enrichment at ER-Inclusion MCSs. Altogether this study identifies STIM1 as a novel component of ER-C. trachomatis inclusion MCSs. We discuss the potential role(s) of STIM1 during the infection process.     

Lipids at membrane contact sites: cell signaling and ion transport

Communication between organelles is essential to coordinate cellular functions and the cell's response to physiological and pathological stimuli. Organellar communication occurs at membrane contact sites (MCSs), where the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane is tethered to cellular organelle membranes by specific tether proteins and where lipid transfer proteins and cell signaling proteins are located. MCSs have many cellular functions and are the sites of lipid and ion transfer between organelles and generation of second messengers. This review discusses several aspects of MCSs in the context of lipid transfer, formation of lipid domains, generation of Ca²⁺ and cAMP second messengers, and regulation of ion transporters by lipids.     

Pex30-like proteins function as adaptors at distinct ER membrane contact sites

Membrane lipids and proteins synthesized in the ER are used for de novo assembly of organelles, such as lipid droplets and peroxisomes. After assembly, the growth of these organelles is supported by ER-derived lipids transferred at membrane contact sites (MCSs). How ER sites for organelle biogenesis and lipid transfer are established and regulated is unclear. Here, we investigate how the ER membrane protein Pex30 and its family members Pex28, Pex29, Pex31, and Pex32 target and function at multiple MCSs. We show that different Pex30 complexes function at distinct ER domains and MCSs. Pex30 targets ER–peroxisome MCSs when bound to Pex28 and Pex32, organizes the nuclear–vacuolar junction when bound to Pex29, and promotes the biogenesis of lipid droplets independently of other family members. Importantly, the reticulon homology domain (RHD) mediates the assembly of the various Pex30 complexes. Given the role of RHD in membrane shaping, our findings offer a mechanistic link between MCS and regulation of membrane curvature.     

Interorganellar communication and membrane contact sites in protozoan parasites

A key characteristic of eukaryotic cells is the presence of organelles with discrete boundaries and functions. Such subcellular compartmentalization into organelles necessitates platforms for communication and material exchange between each other which often involves vesicular trafficking and associated processes. Another way is via the close apposition between organellar membranes, called membrane contact sites (MCSs). Apart from lipid transfer, MCSs have been implicated to mediate in various cellular processes including ion transport, apoptosis, and organelle dynamics. In mammalian and yeast cells, contact sites have been reported between the membranes of the following: the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the plasma membrane (PM), ER and the Golgi apparatus, ER and endosomes (i.e., vacuoles, lysosomes), ER and lipid droplets (LD), the mitochondria and vacuoles, the nucleus and vacuoles, and the mitochondria and lipid droplets, whereas knowledge of MCSs in non-model organisms such as protozoan parasites is extremely limited. Growing evidence suggests that MCSs play more general and conserved roles in cell physiology. In this mini review, we summarize and discuss representative MCSs in divergent parasitic protozoa, and highlight the universality, diversity, and the contribution of MCSs to parasitism.     

Co-opted Oxysterol-Binding ORP and VAP Proteins Channel Sterols to RNA Virus Replication Sites via Membrane Contact Sites

Viruses recruit cellular membranes and subvert cellular proteins involved in lipid biosynthesis to build viral replicase complexes and replication organelles. Among the lipids, sterols are important components of membranes, affecting the shape and curvature of membranes. In this paper, the tombusvirus replication protein is shown to co-opt cellular Oxysterol-binding protein related proteins (ORPs), whose deletion in yeast model host leads to decreased tombusvirus replication. In addition, tombusviruses also subvert Scs2p VAP protein to facilitate the formation of membrane contact sites (MCSs), where membranes are juxtaposed, likely channeling lipids to the replication sites. In all, these events result in redistribution and enrichment of sterols at the sites of viral replication in yeast and plant cells. Using in vitro viral replication assay with artificial vesicles, we show stimulation of tombusvirus replication by sterols. Thus, co-opting cellular ORP and VAP proteins to form MCSs serves the virus need to generate abundant sterol-rich membrane surfaces for tombusvirus replication.

Authors Summary

Cellular proteins and cellular membranes are usurped by positive-stranded RNA viruses to assemble viral replicase complexes required for their replication. Tombusviruses, which are small RNA viruses of plants, depend on sterol-rich membranes for replication. The authors show that the tombusviral replication protein binds to cellular oxysterol-binding ORP proteins. Moreover, the endoplasmic reticulum resident cellular VAP proteins also co-localize with viral replication proteins. These protein interactions likely facilitate the formation of membrane contact sites that are visible in cells replicating tombusvirus RNA. The authors also show that sterols are recruited and enriched to the sites of viral replication. In vitro replication assay was used to show that sterols indeed stimulate tombusvirus replication. In summary, tombusviruses use subverted cellular proteins to build sterol-rich membrane microdomain to promote the assembly of the viral replicase complex. The paper connects efficient virus replication with cellular lipid transport and membrane structures.     

Cnm1: A bridge between mitochondria and nuclear ER

Few membrane contact sites have been defined at the molecular level. By using a high-throughput, microscopy-based screen, Eisenberg-Bord, Zung et al. (2021. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202104100) identify Cnm1 as a novel tethering protein that mediates contact between mitochondria and the nuclear ER in response to phospholipid levels.

Organelles communicate through the exchange of biological materials by vesicular trafficking or at sites of close membrane apposition known as membrane contact sites (MCSs). While the molecular machinery mediating vesicular trafficking has been well characterized, our knowledge of the molecules involved in forming and regulating MCSs is limited. MCSs physically tether two or more organelles via protein–protein or protein–lipid interactions, contain defined proteomes, and perform specific biological functions (1). While MCSs have been appreciated microscopically since the 1950s, only recently have advances in technology permitted the discovery of the molecular composition of some MCSs (2). A major breakthrough occurred when a synthetic biology screen identified the ER–mitochondria encounter structure (ERMES), which forms an MCS between the ER and mitochondria (3). ERMES has since been shown to be involved in phospholipid transport between mitochondria and the ER (4). While ERMES is one of the best characterized MCSs, there are still many questions as to the precise molecules being transported at ER–mitochondria contacts and how directionality of transport is achieved. Subsequent studies using split fluorescent proteins revealed that nearly all organelles appear to form MCSs of some kind (5). Thus, despite progress in defining the components and functions of a few MCSs, there are still many MCSs whose molecular identities are completely unknown.Recently, a study in mammalian cells identified an MCS between the nucleus and mitochondria that plays a role in adapting cells to stress via the mitochondrial retrograde signaling response (6). The proteins that form this MCS are not conserved in yeast, however, suggesting that alternative mechanisms for nucleus–mitochondria contacts exist in other organisms. In this issue, Eisenberg-Bord, Zung et al., set out to identify proteins involved in forming an MCS between mitochondria and the nuclear ER that is distinct from ERMES-mediated ER–mitochondria contacts (7). First, high-resolution cryo-electron tomographs revealed that mitochondria form contacts with the nucleus that have an average separation of ∼20 nm, which is within the expected range for a bona fide MCS (1). To identify the molecular composition of this contact site, the authors generated a synthetic reporter that is specific to nucleus-mitochondria contacts by fusing one part of a split fluorescent protein to an outer mitochondrial membrane protein and the other to a peripheral nuclear protein. A high-throughput, microscopy-based genetic screen was then used to compare the localization of the synthetic reporter to fluorescently tagged versions of all yeast proteins. Candidates were refined by determining which proteins caused an expansion of the nucleus–mitochondria contact site upon overexpression, a phenotype that has been observed with other MCS proteins (8). Based on these results, the best candidate for a molecular tether between mitochondria and the nucleus was Ybr063c.Ybr063c is a 46-kD nonessential protein of uncharacterized function that contains predicted transmembrane domains. The authors first demonstrated that Ybr063c is an integral membrane protein residing on the nuclear membrane. In support of Ybr063c forming a nucleus–mitochondria contact site that is distinct from ERMES, Ybr063c did not colocalize with ERMES subunits nor did overexpression of Ybr063c alter the size of ERMES patches. Remarkably, overexpression of Ybr063c resulted in the mitochondrial network becoming tightly associated with the nuclear membrane. Based on these results, the authors concluded that Ybr063c functions as a molecular tether between mitochondria and the nucleus and the protein was renamed Cnm1 for contact nucleus mitochondria 1.Through further genetic screens, Eisenberg-Bord, Zung et al., identified several genes that are required to cluster mitochondria around the nucleus when Cnm1 is overexpressed. Interestingly, several of these genes are known to function in phosphatidylcholine (PC) metabolism. Deletion of these components resulted in a decrease in Cnm1 expression, which alters the extent of nucleus-mitochondria contacts. Overexpression of Cnm1 in genetic conditions that reduce PC levels resulted in exaggerated growth defects. These results raise the possibility that Cnm1-mediated nuclear–mitochondria contacts may be involved in the transport of PC from the ER to mitochondria. Thus, while the functional importance is unknown, Cnm1-mediated nuclear–mitochondria contacts respond to PC levels.The genetic screens also identified a single resident mitochondrial protein, Tom70, as affecting the ability of overexpressed Cnm1 to cluster mitochondria around the nucleus. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that localization of Cnm1 to the nuclear membrane and Tom70 to the mitochondrial membrane is required to tether mitochondria to the nucleus upon overexpression of Cnm1. Thus, Cnm1 and Tom70 mediate an MCS between mitochondria and the nucleus.The identification of Cnm1-mediated nucleus–mitochondria contacts opens many questions about the function and composition of the contact site and how it operates in the broader context of mitochondrial–nuclear communication. While identifying the functions of MCSs has proven challenging, the genetic screens conducted in this study provide an excellent starting point by elucidating a link between Cnm1 and PC metabolism. The authors propose that Cnm1-mediated contacts could function in the direct transport of PC from the ER to mitochondria (Fig. 1). In this model, ERMES, which likely functions in earlier steps of PC synthesis by transporting phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) or phosphatidylserine (PS), would have a distinct but related function in organizing and maintaining a pipeline for the transport of lipids between the ER and mitochondria (Fig. 1). This model is speculative, however, and future experiments will be necessary to define the role of Cnm1 in PC metabolism.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The ER and vacuole form multiple MCSs with mitochondria in budding yeast. The ER is depicted in green, and the mitochondrial network is depicted in gray. ERMES mediates an MCS between tubular ER and mitochondria. In addition to functions that are distinct from lipid trafficking, ERMES-mediated MCSs likely function to transport PS or PE between the organelles. Cnm1 mediates an MCS specifically between the nuclear ER and mitochondria and potentially functions in PC transport. The Vps13-Mcp1 vCLAMP mediates an MCS between mitochondria and the vacuole that likely functions in lipid transport and may have redundant functions with ERMES. The Vps39-Tom40 vCLAMP is a separate MCS between mitochondria and the vacuole that responds to different stress conditions, though its function is unknown.There is a growing body of evidence that two organelles can form multiple MCSs that are spatially and functionally distinct. In addition to ERMES and Cnm1-mediated mitochondria–ER contacts, in yeast, two distinct MCSs have been described between mitochondria and the vacuole that are referred to as vacuolar and mitochondrial patches, or vCLAMPs. One, mediated by Vam6 and Tom40, has been implicated in responding to cellular stress while the other, mediated by Mcp1 and Vps13, may have overlapping functions with the ERMES complex (8, 9; Fig. 1). Interestingly, many of the proteins present at MCSs have been shown to be multifunctional (2). For example, the vCLAMP component Vam6 is also a subunit of the homotypic fusion and protein-sorting (HOPS) complex while its binding partner Tom40 is the central subunit of the translocase of outer membrane (TOM) complex (8). Thus, while these complexes have distinct biological functions in vacuolar protein sorting and mitochondrial protein import respectively, individual subunits have moonlighting functions in the formation, and perhaps function, of MCSs. Eisenberg-Bord, Zung et al., now reveal that Tom70, another component of the TOM complex, also plays a role in the formation of nucleus–mitochondria contacts. This raises the exciting possibility that cells use these multifunctional proteins to coordinate functions such as mitochondrial protein import with lipid trafficking. A crucial next step will be to determine how the multiple functions of these proteins are coordinated to maintain organelle homeostasis.Nuclear–mitochondrial communication is a critical aspect of eukaryotic cellular life that allows cells to adapt to different environmental conditions and energy needs. A breakdown in communication between mitochondria and the nucleus has been implicated in several diseases, including cancers (10). The formation of a nucleus–mitochondria MCS likely facilitates the exchange of lipids or small molecules that stimulate signaling pathways to help cells respond to environmental changes or mitochondrial damage (6, 7). Identifying the molecules that regulate these contacts and clarifying the physiological contexts under which these contacts function is crucial to our understanding of human disease. Thus, the identification of a nucleus-mitochondria MCS represents a significant breakthrough in our understanding of nucleus–mitochondria communication.     

A grab to move on: ER–endosome contacts in membrane protrusion formation and neurite outgrowth

A key feature of many eukaryotic cells, most prominently seen in developing neurons, is their ability to form and extend membrane protrusions. How protrusion formation is linked to exocytic membrane trafficking is largely unclear. In a recent paper published in Nature, Raiborg et al identify a crucial role in this process for dynamic membrane contact sites (MCSs) between the ER and endosomes. The MCSs are formed by endoplasmic reticulum (ER)‐localized protein protrudin and the late endosomal kinesin adaptor FYCO1 and the small GTPase Rab7.     

Yeast Vps13 promotes mitochondrial function and is localized at membrane contact sites

The Vps13 protein family is highly conserved in eukaryotic cells. Mutations in human VPS13 genes result in a variety of diseases, such as chorea acanthocytosis (ChAc), but the cellular functions of Vps13 proteins are not well defined. In yeast, there is a single VPS13 orthologue, which is required for at least two different processes: protein sorting to the vacuole and sporulation. This study demonstrates that VPS13 is also important for mitochondrial integrity. In addition to preventing transfer of DNA from the mitochondrion to the nucleus, VPS13 suppresses mitophagy and functions in parallel with the endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondrion encounter structure (ERMES). In different growth conditions, Vps13 localizes to endosome–mitochondrion contacts and to the nuclear–vacuole junctions, indicating that Vps13 may function at membrane contact sites. The ability of VPS13 to compensate for the absence of ERMES correlates with its intracellular distribution. We propose that Vps13 is present at multiple membrane contact sites and that separation-of-function mutants are due to loss of Vps13 at specific junctions. Introduction of VPS13A mutations identified in ChAc patients at cognate sites in yeast VPS13 are specifically defective in compensating for the lack of ERMES, suggesting that mitochondrial dysfunction might be the basis for ChAc.     

Spatial compartmentalization of lipid droplet biogenesis

Lipid droplets (LDs) are ubiquitous organelles that store metabolic energy in the form of neutral lipids (typically triacylglycerols and steryl esters). Beyond being inert energy storage compartments, LDs are dynamic organelles that participate in numerous essential metabolic functions. Cells generate LDs de novo from distinct sub-regions at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), but what determines sites of LD formation remains a key unanswered question. Here, we review the factors that determine LD formation at the ER, and discuss how they work together to spatially and temporally coordinate LD biogenesis. These factors include lipid synthesis enzymes, assembly proteins, and membrane structural requirements. LDs also make contact with other organelles, and these inter-organelle contacts contribute to defining sites of LD production. Finally, we highlight emerging non-canonical roles for LDs in maintaining cellular homeostasis during stress.     

Ltc1 is an ER-localized sterol transporter and a component of ER–mitochondria and ER–vacuole contacts

Organelle contact sites perform fundamental functions in cells, including lipid and ion homeostasis, membrane dynamics, and signaling. Using a forward proteomics approach in yeast, we identified new ER–mitochondria and ER–vacuole contacts specified by an uncharacterized protein, Ylr072w. Ylr072w is a conserved protein with GRAM and VASt domains that selectively transports sterols and is thus termed Ltc1, for Lipid transfer at contact site 1. Ltc1 localized to ER–mitochondria and ER–vacuole contacts via the mitochondrial import receptors Tom70/71 and the vacuolar protein Vac8, respectively. At mitochondria, Ltc1 was required for cell viability in the absence of Mdm34, a subunit of the ER–mitochondria encounter structure. At vacuoles, Ltc1 was required for sterol-enriched membrane domain formation in response to stress. Increasing the proportion of Ltc1 at vacuoles was sufficient to induce sterol-enriched vacuolar domains without stress. Thus, our data support a model in which Ltc1 is a sterol-dependent regulator of organelle and cellular homeostasis via its dual localization to ER–mitochondria and ER–vacuole contact sites.     

Routes and mechanisms of post‐endosomal cholesterol trafficking: A story that never ends

Mammalian cells acquire most exogenous cholesterol through receptor‐mediated endocytosis of low‐density lipoproteins (LDLs). After internalization, LDL cholesteryl esters are hydrolyzed to release free cholesterol, which then translocates to late endosomes (LEs)/lysosomes (LYs) and incorporates into the membranes by co‐ordinated actions of Niemann‐Pick type C (NPC) 1 and NPC2 proteins. However, how cholesterol exits LEs/LYs and moves to other organelles remain largely unclear. Growing evidence has suggested that nonvesicular transport is critically involved in the post‐endosomal cholesterol trafficking. Numerous sterol‐transfer proteins (STPs) have been identified to mediate directional cholesterol transfer at membrane contact sites (MCSs) formed between 2 closely apposed organelles. In addition, a recent study reveals that lysosome‐peroxisome membrane contact (LPMC) established by a non‐STP synaptotagmin VII and a specific phospholipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate also serves as a novel and important path for LDL‐cholesterol trafficking. These findings highlight an essential role of MCSs in intracellular cholesterol transport, and further work is needed to unveil how various routes are regulated and integrated to maintain proper cholesterol distribution and homeostasis in eukaryotic cells.      

Palmitoylation plays a role in targeting Vac8p to specific membrane subdomains

Vac8p is a multifunctional yeast protein involved in several distinct vacuolar events including vacuole inheritance, vacuole homotypic fusion, nucleus-vacuole junction formation and the cytoplasm to vacuole protein targeting pathway. Vac8p associates with the vacuole membrane via myristoylation and palmitoylation. Vac8p has three putative palmitoylation sites, at Cys 4, 5 and 7. Here, we show that each of these cysteines may serve as a palmitoylation site. Palmitoylation at Cys 7 alone provides partial function of Vac8p, whereas palmitoylation at either Cys 4 or Cys 5 alone is sufficient for Vac8p function. In the former mutant, there is a severe defect in the localization of Vac8p to the vacuole membrane, while in the latter mutants, there is a partial defect in the localization of Vac8p. In addition, our studies provide evidence that palmitoylation targets Vac8p to specific membrane subdomains.     

Piecing together the structural organisation of lipid exchange at membrane contact sites

Membrane contact sites (MCSs) are areas of close proximity between organelles, implicated in transport of small molecules and in organelle biogenesis. Lipid transfer proteins at MCSs facilitate the distribution of lipid species between organelle membranes. Such exchange processes rely on the apposition of two different membranes delimiting distinct compartments and a cytosolic intermembrane space. Maintaining organelle identity while transferring molecules therefore implies control over MCS architecture both on the ultrastructural and molecular levels. Factors including intermembrane distance, density of resident proteins, and contact surface area fine-tune MCS function. Furthermore, the structural arrangement of lipid transfer proteins and associated proteins underpins the molecular mechanisms of lipid fluxes at MCSs. Thus, the architecture of MCSs emerges as an essential aspect of their function.     

Chlamydiae interaction with the endoplasmic reticulum: contact,function and consequences

Chlamydiae and chlamydiae‐related organisms are obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens. They reside in a membrane‐bound compartment termed the inclusion and have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to interact with cellular organelles. This review focuses on the nature, the function(s) and the consequences of chlamydiae–inclusion interaction with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The inclusion membrane establishes very close contact with the ER at specific sites termed ER–inclusion membrane contact sites (MCSs). These MCSs are constituted of a specific set of factors, including the C. trachomatis effector protein IncD and the host cell proteins CERT and VAPA/B. Because CERT and VAPA/B have a demonstrated role in the non‐vesicular trafficking of lipids between the ER and the Golgi, it was proposed that Chlamydia establish MCSs with the ER to acquire host lipids. However, the recruitment of additional factors to ER–inclusion MCSs, such as the ER calcium sensor STIM1, may suggest additional functions unrelated to lipid acquisition. Finally, chlamydiae interaction with the ER appears to induce the ER stress response, but this response is quickly dampened by chlamydiae to promote host cell survival.     

Peroxisome development in yeast is associated with the formation of Pex3-dependent peroxisome-vacuole contact sites

Using electron and fluorescence microscopy techniques, we identified various physical contacts between peroxisomes and other cell organelles in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha.In exponential glucose-grown cells, which typically contain a single small peroxisome, contacts were only observed with the endoplasmic reticulum and the plasma membrane. Here we focus on a novel peroxisome-vacuole contact site that is formed when glucose-grown cells are shifted to methanol containing media, conditions that induce strong peroxisome development. At these conditions, the small peroxisomes rapidly increase in size, a phenomenon that is paralleled by the formation of distinct intimate contacts with the vacuole.Localization studies showed that the peroxin Pex3 accumulated in patches at the peroxisome-vacuole contact sites. In wild-type cells growing exponentially on medium containing glucose, peroxisome-vacuole contact sites were never observed. However, upon overproduction of Pex3 peroxisomes also associated to vacuoles at these growth conditions.Our observations strongly suggest a role for Pex3 in the formation of a novel peroxisome-vacuole contact site. This contact likely plays a role in membrane growth as it is formed solely at conditions of strong peroxisome expansion.     

Optical manipulation reveals strong attracting forces at membrane contact sites between endoplasmic reticulum and chloroplasts

Eukaryote cells depend on membrane lipid trafficking from biogenic membranes, like the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), to other membranes in the cell. Two major routes for membrane lipid transport are recognized: vesicular trafficking and lipid transfer at zones of close contact between membranes. Specific ER regions involved in such membrane contact sites (MCSs) have been isolated, and lipid transfer at MCSs as well as protein-protein interactions between the partaking membranes have been demonstrated (reviewed by Holthuis, J. C. M., and Levine, T. P. (2005) Nat. Rev. 6, 209-220). Here we present the first demonstration of the physical association between membranes involved in MCSs: by using optical imaging and manipulation, strong attracting forces between ER and chloroplasts are revealed. We used Arabidopsis thaliana expressing green fluorescent protein in the ER lumen and observed leaf protoplasts by confocal microscopy. The ER network was evident, with ER branch end points apparently localized at chloroplast surfaces. After rupture of a protoplast using a laser scalpel, the cell content was released. ER fragments remained attached to the released chloroplasts and could be stretched out by optical tweezers. The applied force, 400 pN, could not drag a chloroplast free from its attached ER, which could reflect protein-protein interactions at the ER-chloroplast MCSs. As chloroplasts rely on import of ER-synthesized lipids, we propose that lipid transfer occurs at these MCSs. We suggest that lipid transfer at the MCSs also occurs in the opposite direction, for example to channel plastid-synthesized acyl groups to supply substrates for ER-localized synthesis of membrane and storage lipids.     

The new role of poly (rC)-binding proteins as iron transport chaperones: Proteins that could couple with inter-organelle interactions to safely traffic iron

BackgroundIntracellular iron transport is mediated by iron chaperone proteins known as the poly(rC)-binding proteins (PCBPs), which were originally identified as RNA/DNA-binding molecules.Scope of reviewPCBPs assume a role as not only as cytosolic iron carriers, but also as regulators of iron transport and recycling. PCBP1 is involved in the iron storage pathway that involves ferritin, while PCBP2 is involved in processes that include: iron transfer from the iron importer, divalent metal ion transporter 1; iron export mediated by ferroportin-1; and heme degradation via heme oxygenase 1.Major conclusionsBoth PCBP1 and PCBP2 possess iron-binding activity and form hetero/homo dimer complexes. These iron chaperones have a subset of non-redundant functions and regulate iron metabolism independently.General significanceThis intracellular iron chaperone system mediated by PCBPs provide a transport “gateway” of ferrous iron that may potentially link with dynamic, inter-organelle interactions to safely traffic intracellular iron.     

Regulation and physiology of membrane contact sites

Membrane contact sites (MCSs) in addition to impacting the functions of membrane-limited organelles also have a role in the spatial and functional organization of cells, tissues and whole organisms. MCSs have been identified between all organelles and the identification of their molecular composition has progressed significantly in recent years. Equally important is how MCSs respond dynamically to physiological stimuli, how this is regulated, and the physiological roles of MCSs in tissues and at the organismal level, an area that still remains relatively unexplored. In the present review, we focus on the regulation of MCSs, considerations of their function at the organismal level, and how mutations of MCS components linked to genetic diseases might inform us about their physiological relevance.