Characterization of silencing suppressor p24 of Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 2

Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 2 (GLRaV‐2) p24 has been reported to be an RNA silencing suppressor (RSS). However, the mechanisms underlying p24's suppression of RNA silencing are unknown. Using Agrobacterium infiltration‐mediated RNA silencing assays, we showed that GLRaV‐2 p24 is a strong RSS triggered by positive‐sense green fluorescent protein (GFP) RNA, and that silencing suppression by p24 effectively blocks the accumulation of small interfering RNAs. Deletion analyses showed that the region of amino acids 1–188, which contains all predicted α‐helices and β‐strands, is required for the RSS activity of p24. Hydrophobic residues I35/F38/V85/V89/W149 and V162/L169/L170, previously shown to be critical for p24 self‐interaction, are also crucial for silencing suppression, and western blotting results suggested that a lack of self‐interaction ability results in decreased p24 accumulation in plants. The mutants showed greatly weakened or a lack of RSS activity. Substitution with two basic residues at positions 2 or 86, putatively involved in RNA binding, totally abolished the RSS activity of p24, suggesting that p24 uses an RNA‐binding strategy to suppress RNA silencing. Our results also showed that W54 in the WG/GW‐like motif (W54/G55) is crucial for the RSS activity of p24, whereas p24 does not physically interact with AGO1 of Nicotiana benthamiana. Furthermore, p24 did not promote AGO1 degradation, but significantly up‐regulated AGO1 mRNA expression, and this effect was correlated with the RSS activity of p24, indicating that p24 may interfere with microRNA‐directed processes. The presented results contribute to our understanding of viral suppression of RNA silencing and the molecular mechanisms underlying GLRaV‐2 infection.     

A critical domain of Sweet potato chlorotic fleck virus nucleotide‐binding protein (NaBp) for RNA silencing suppression,nuclear localization and viral pathogenesis

RNA silencing is an important mechanism of antiviral defence in plants. To counteract this resistance mechanism, many viruses have evolved RNA silencing suppressors. In this study, we analysed five proteins encoded by Sweet potato chlorotic fleck virus (SPCFV) for their abilities to suppress RNA silencing using a green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐based transient expression assay in Nicotiana benthamiana line 16c plants. Our results showed that a putative nucleotide‐binding protein (NaBp), but not other proteins encoded by the virus, could efficiently suppress local and systemic RNA silencing induced by either sense or double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecules. Deletion mutation analysis of NaBp demonstrated that the basic motif (an arginine‐rich region) was critical for its RNA silencing suppression activity. Using confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging of transfected protoplasts expressing NaBp fused to GFP, we showed that NaBp accumulated predominantly in the nucleus. Mutational analysis of NaBp demonstrated that the basic motif represented part of the nuclear localization signal. In addition, we demonstrated that the basic motif in NaBp was a pathogenicity determinant in the Potato virus X (PVX) heterogeneous system. Overall, our results demonstrate that the basic motif of SPCFV NaBp plays a critical role in RNA silencing suppression, nuclear localization and viral pathogenesis.     

Two amino acids near the N‐terminus of Cucumber mosaic virus 2b play critical roles in the suppression of RNA silencing and viral infectivity

Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) 2b suppresses RNA silencing primarily through the binding of double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) of varying sizes. However, the biologically active form of 2b remains elusive. Here, we demonstrate that the single and double alanine substitution mutants in the N‐terminal 15th leucine and 18th methionine of CMV 2b exhibit drastically attenuated virulence in wild‐type plants, but are efficiently rescued in mutant plants defective in RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6) and Dicer‐like 4 (DCL4). Moreover, the transgenic plants of 2b, but not 2blm (L15A/M18A), rescue the high infectivity of CMV‐Δ2b through the suppression of antiviral silencing. L15A, M18A or both weaken 2b suppressor activity on local and systemic transgene silencing. In contrast with the high affinity of 2b to short and long dsRNAs, 2blm is significantly compromised in 21‐bp duplex small interfering RNA (siRNA) binding ability, but maintains a strong affinity for long dsRNAs. In cross‐linking assays, 2b can form dimers, tetramers and oligomers after treatment with glutaraldehyde, whereas 2blm only forms dimers, rather than tetramers and oligomers, in vitro. Together, these findings suggest that L15 and M18 of CMV 2b are required for high affinity to ds‐siRNAs and oligomerization activity, which are essential for the suppression activity of 2b on antiviral silencing.     

A dual gene‐silencing vector system for monocot and dicot plants

Plant virus‐based gene‐silencing vectors have been extensively and successfully used to elucidate functional genomics in plants. However, only limited virus‐induced gene‐silencing (VIGS) vectors can be used in both monocot and dicot plants. Here, we established a dual gene‐silencing vector system based on Bamboo mosaic virus (BaMV) and its satellite RNA (satBaMV). Both BaMV and satBaMV vectors could effectively silence endogenous genes in Nicotiana benthamiana and Brachypodium distachyon. The satBaMV vector could also silence the green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgene in GFP transgenic N. benthamiana. GFP transgenic plants co‐agro‐inoculated with BaMV and satBaMV vectors carrying sulphur and GFP genes, respectively, could simultaneously silence both genes. Moreover, the silenced plants could still survive with the silencing of genes essential for plant development such as heat‐shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and Hsp70. In addition, the satBaMV‐ but not BaMV‐based vector could enhance gene‐silencing efficiency in newly emerging leaves of N. benthamiana deficient in RNA‐dependant RNA polymerase 6. The dual gene‐silencing vector system of BaMV and satBaMV provides a novel tool for comparative functional studies in monocot and dicot plants.     

Polerovirus protein P0 prevents the assembly of small RNA‐containing RISC complexes and leads to degradation of ARGONAUTE1

RNA silencing plays an important role in plants in defence against viruses. To overcome this defence, plant viruses encode suppressors of RNA silencing. The most common mode of silencing suppression is sequestration of double‐stranded RNAs involved in the antiviral silencing pathways. Viral suppressors can also overcome silencing responses through protein–protein interaction. The poleroviral P0 silencing suppressor protein targets ARGONAUTE (AGO) proteins for degradation. AGO proteins are the core component of the RNA‐induced silencing complex (RISC). We found that P0 does not interfere with the slicer activity of pre‐programmed siRNA/miRNA containing AGO1, but prevents de novo formation of siRNA/miRNA containing AGO1. We show that the AGO1 protein is part of a high‐molecular‐weight complex, suggesting the existence of a multi‐protein RISC in plants. We propose that P0 prevents RISC assembly by interacting with one of its protein components, thus inhibiting formation of siRNA/miRNA–RISC, and ultimately leading to AGO1 degradation. Our findings also suggest that siRNAs enhance the stability of co‐expressed AGO1 in both the presence and absence of P0.     

A Turnip crinkle virus Isolate Lacking the CP Counter‐Defence Protein Gene Providing Protection Against the Wild‐Type Strain is Associated with Highly Localized RNA Silencing

Cross‐protection has been used successfully and commercially to control a range of virus diseases for which the selection of suitable mild strains of plant viruses is necessary. Turnip crinkle virus (TCV) is highly pathogenic on Arabidopsis plants and its silencing suppressor‐defective mutant, TCVΔCP, can induce highly localized RNA silencing which is differs from that of other protective strains. We found that TCVΔCP provides some protection against wild‐type TCV but lacks complete protection, and the relative locations of the protective virus and challenge virus affect the degree of cross‐protection. However, similar cross‐protection afforded by TCVΔCP is not observed in Nicotiana benthamiana plants. As expected, TCVΔCP pre‐infected Arabidopsis plants fail to protect against infection with the unrelated Cucumber mosaic virus, strain Fhy. It appears that cross‐protection afforded by TCVΔCP requires that the challenge virus be very similar in sequence, which is a characteristic of RNA silencing. In order to investigate whether the protection is associated with the highly localized RNA silencing, mutant plants involved in key silencing pathway genes of RNA silencing machinery, including dcl2, dcl4 and triple dcl2/dcl3/dcl4 mutants were used. The results demonstrate that cross‐protection afforded by TCVΔCP is dependent on host RNA silencing, and both DCL2 and DCL4 play important roles in this process.     

Resistance to Phytophthora pathogens is dependent on gene silencing pathways in plants

RNA silencing is one of the main defence mechanisms employed by plants to fight pathogens. p19 protein encoded by the tomato bushy stunt virus (TBSVp19) is known as a suppressor of RNA silencing via siRNA sequestration to prevent the assembly of RISC. To better understand the impact of TBSVp19 on silencing and its roles in Phytophthora pathogens, we used the transient expression assay in Nicotiana benthamiana and found that the leaves expressing TBSVp19 were more susceptible to Phytophthora parasitica. Furthermore, we demonstrated that TBSVp19‐mediated plant susceptibility in N. benthamiana is dependent on RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6). We also tested the role of RNA silencing in resistance of soybean hairy roots to Phytophthora. The lesion size induced by P. sojae on TBSVp19‐expressing soybean hairy roots was slightly, but significantly larger than GFP‐expressing soybean hairy roots. Finally, the Arabidopsis gene silencing mutants ago1‐27, zip‐1, sgs3‐11 and rdr6‐11 were also examined for their resistance to P. parasitica. The results clearly showed that resistance levels of the mutants were visibly reduced compared with the wild type. Taken together, these results suggest that the gene silencing system in plants is essential for resistance to Phytophthora pathogens.     

Molecular insights into the function of the viral RNA silencing suppressor HCPro

Potyviral helper component proteinase (HCPro) is a well‐characterized suppressor of antiviral RNA silencing, but its mechanism of action is not yet fully understood. In this study, we used affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry to identify binding partners of HCPro in potyvirus‐infected plant cells. This approach led to identification of various HCPro interactors, including two key enzymes of the methionine cycle, S–adenosyl‐l –methionine synthase and S–adenosyl‐l –homocysteine hydrolase. This finding, together with the results of enzymatic activity and gene knockdown experiments, suggests a mechanism in which HCPro complexes containing viral and host proteins act to suppress antiviral RNA silencing through local disruption of the methionine cycle. Another group of HCPro interactors identified in this study comprised ribosomal proteins. Immunoaffinity purification of ribosomes demonstrated that HCPro is associated with ribosomes in virus‐infected cells. Furthermore, we show that HCPro and ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1), the core component of the RNA‐induced silencing complex (RISC), interact with each other and are both associated with ribosomes in planta. These results, together with the fact that AGO1 association with ribosomes is a hallmark of RISC‐mediated translational repression, suggest a second mechanism of HCPro action, whereby ribosome‐associated multiprotein complexes containing HCPro relieve viral RNA translational repression through interaction with AGO1.     

The ORF5 of Grapevine virus A is involved in symptoms expression in Nicotiana benthamiana plants

Grapevine virus A (GVA), a member of the genus Vitivirus which belongs to the family Flexiviridae, has a single‐stranded RNA genome of about 7.4 kb that comprises five open reading frames (ORFs). ORF5 encodes a small 10‐kDa protein (p10), which is believed to interact with nucleic acids and to suppress the plant's RNA‐ silencing response. We obtained molecular and biological data indicating that ORF5‐encoded product, specifically its N‐terminus, affects the appearance of symptoms in Nicotiana benthamiana plants. The ORF5‐encoded products of the severe GR5 and the mild GTR1‐1 isolates were found to affect RNA silencing similarly in mesophyll cells of N. benthamiana, despite being involved in different expressions of symptoms on this host.     

Respective contributions of Arabidopsis DCL2 and DCL4 to RNA silencing

Dicer proteins are central to the different mechanisms involving RNA interference. Plants have evolved multiple DICER‐LIKE (DCL) copies, thus enabling functional diversification. In Arabidopsis, DCL2 and DCL4 process double‐stranded RNA into 22 and 21 nucleotide small interfering (si)RNAs, respectively, and have overlapping functions with regards to virus and transgene silencing. Nonetheless, some studies have reported that dcl2 or dcl4 single mutations are sometimes sufficient to hinder silencing. To better dissect the role of DCL2 and DCL4, we analyzed silencing kinetics and efficiencies using different transgenic systems in single and double mutant backgrounds. The results indicate that DCL2 stimulates transitivity and secondary siRNA production through DCL4 while being sufficient for silencing on its own. Notably, silencing of 35S‐driven transgenes functions more efficiently in dcl4 mutants, indicating that DCL4 mostly obscures DCL2 in wild‐type plants. Nonetheless, in a dcl4 mutant compromised in phloem‐originating silencing, ectopically expressed DCL2 allows restoration of silencing, suggesting that DCL2 is not, or poorly, expressed in phloem. Remarkably, this ectopic DCL2 contribution to phloem‐originating silencing is dependent on the activity of RNA‐DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE6. These results indicate that, despite differences in the silencing activity of their small RNA products, DCL2 and DCL4 mostly act redundantly yet hierarchically when present simultaneously.     

The Arabidopsis STRESS RESPONSE SUPPRESSOR DEAD‐box RNA helicases are nucleolar‐ and chromocenter‐localized proteins that undergo stress‐mediated relocalization and are involved in epigenetic gene silencing

DEAD‐box RNA helicases are involved in many aspects of RNA metabolism and in diverse biological processes in plants. Arabidopsis thaliana mutants of two DEAD‐box RNA helicases, STRESS RESPONSE SUPPRESSOR1 (STRS1) and STRS2 were previously shown to exhibit tolerance to abiotic stresses and up‐regulated stress‐responsive gene expression. Here, we show that Arabidopsis STRS‐overexpressing lines displayed a less tolerant phenotype and reduced expression of stress‐induced genes confirming the STRSs as attenuators of Arabidopsis stress responses. GFP–STRS fusion proteins exhibited localization to the nucleolus, nucleoplasm and chromocenters and exhibited relocalization in response to abscisic acid (ABA) treatment and various stresses. This relocalization was reversed when stress treatments were removed. The STRS proteins displayed mis‐localization in specific gene‐silencing mutants and exhibited RNA‐dependent ATPase and RNA‐unwinding activities. In particular, STRS2 showed mis‐localization in three out of four mutants of the RNA‐directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway while STRS1 was mis‐localized in the hd2c mutant that is defective in histone deacetylase activity. Furthermore, heterochromatic RdDM target loci displayed reduced DNA methylation and increased expression in the strs mutants. Taken together, our findings suggest that the STRS proteins are involved in epigenetic silencing of gene expression to bring about suppression of the Arabidopsis stress response.     

RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 6 is required for efficient hpRNA-induced gene silencing in plants

In plants, transgenes with inverted repeats are used to induce efficient RNA silencing, which is also frequently induced by highly transcribed sense transgenes. RNA silencing induced by sense transgenes is dependent on RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6), which converts single-stranded (ss) RNA into double-stranded (ds) RNA. By contrast, it has been proposed that RNA silencing induced by self-complementary hairpin RNA (hpRNA) does not require RDR6, because the hpRNA can directly fold back on itself to form dsRNA. However, it is unclear whether RDR6 plays a role in hpRNA-induced RNA silencing by amplifying dsRNA to spread RNA silencing within the plant. To address the efficiency of hpRNA-induced RNA silencing in the presence or absence of RDR6, Wild type (WT, Col-0) and rdr6-11 Arabidopsis thaliana lines expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) were generated and transformed with a GFP-RNA interference (RNAi) construct. Whereas most GFP-RNAi-transformed WT lines exhibited almost complete silencing of GFP expression in the T1 generation, various levels of GFP expression remained among the GFP-RNAi-transformed rdr6-11 lines. Homozygous expression of GFP-RNAi in the T3 generation was not sufficient to induce complete GFP silencing in several rdr6-11 lines. Our results indicate that RDR6 is required for efficient hpRNA-induced RNA silencing in plants.     

Dissecting the multifunctional role of the N‐terminal domain of the Melon necrotic spot virus coat protein in RNA packaging,viral movement and interference with antiviral plant defence

The coat protein (CP) of Melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV) is structurally composed of three major domains. The middle S‐domain builds a robust protein shell around the viral genome, whereas the C‐terminal protruding domain, or P‐domain, is involved in the attachment of virions to the transmission vector. Here, we have shown that the N‐terminal domain, or R‐domain, and the arm region, which connects the R‐domain and S‐domain, are involved in different key steps of the viral cycle, such as cell‐to‐cell movement and the suppression of RNA silencing and pathogenesis through their RNA‐binding capabilities. Deletion mutants revealed that the CP RNA‐binding ability was abolished only after complete, but not partial, deletion of the R‐domain and the arm region. However, a comparison of the apparent dissociation constants for the CP RNA‐binding reaction of several partial deletion mutants showed that the arm region played a more relevant role than the R‐domain in in vitro RNA binding. Similar results were obtained in in vivo assays, although, in this case, full‐length CPs were required to encapsidate full‐length genomes. We also found that the R‐domain carboxyl portion and the arm region were essential for efficient cell‐to‐cell movement, for enhancement of Potato virus X pathogenicity, for suppression of systemic RNA silencing and for binding of small RNAs. Therefore, unlike other carmovirus CPs, the R‐domain and the arm region of MNSV CP have acquired, in addition to other essential functions such as genome binding and encapsidation functions, the ability to suppress RNA silencing by preventing systemic small RNA transport.     

dsRNA with 5′ overhangs contributes to endogenous and antiviral RNA silencing pathways in plants

In plants, SGS3 and RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6) are required to convert single‐ to double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) in the innate RNAi‐based antiviral response and to produce both exogenous and endogenous short‐interfering RNAs. Although a role for RDR6‐catalysed RNA‐dependent RNA polymerisation in these processes seems clear, the function of SGS3 is unknown. Here, we show that SGS3 is a dsRNA‐binding protein with unexpected substrate selectivity favouring 5′‐overhang‐containing dsRNA. The conserved XS and coiled‐coil domains are responsible for RNA‐binding activity. Furthermore, we find that the V2 protein from tomato yellow leaf curl virus, which suppresses the RNAi‐based host immune response, is a dsRNA‐binding protein with similar specificity to SGS3. In competition‐binding experiments, V2 outcompetes SGS3 for substrate dsRNA recognition, whereas a V2 point mutant lacking the suppressor function in vivo cannot efficiently overcome SGS3 binding. These findings suggest that SGS3 recognition of dsRNA containing a 5′ overhang is required for subsequent steps in RNA‐mediated gene silencing in plants, and that V2 functions as a viral suppressor by preventing SGS3 from accessing substrate RNAs.     

Differential contributions of plant Dicer‐like proteins to antiviral defences against potato virus X in leaves and roots

Members of the plant Dicer‐like (DCL) protein family are the critical components of the RNA‐silencing pathway that mediates innate antiviral defence. The distinct antiviral role of each individual DCL protein has been established with mostly based on observations of aerial parts of plants. Thus, although the roots are closely associated with the life cycle of many plant viruses, little is known about the antiviral activities of DCL proteins in roots. We observed that antiviral silencing strongly inhibits potato virus X (PVX) replication in roots of some susceptible Solanaceae species. Silencing of the DCL4 homolog in Nicotiana benthamiana partially elevated PVX replication levels in roots. In Arabidopsis thaliana, which was originally considered a non‐host plant of PVX, high levels of PVX accumulation in inoculated leaves were achieved by inactivation of DCL4, while in the upper leaves and roots, it required the additional inactivation of DCL2. In transgenic A. thaliana carrying the PVX amplicon with a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene insertion in the chromosome (AMP243 line), absence of DCL4 enabled high levels of PVX‐GFP accumulation in various aerial organs but not in the roots, suggesting that DCL4 is critical for intracellular antiviral silencing in shoots but not in roots, where it can be functionally compensated by other DCL proteins. Together, the high level of functional redundancies among DCL proteins may contribute to the potent antiviral activities against PVX replication in roots.     

ERIL1, the plant homologue of ERI‐1, is involved in the processing of chloroplastic rRNAs

Proteins belonging to the enhancer of RNA interference‐1 subfamily of 3′–5′ exoribonucleases participate in divergent RNA pathways. They degrade small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), thus suppressing RNA interference, and are involved in the maturation of ribosomal RNAs and the degradation of histone messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Here, we report evidence for the role of the plant homologue of these proteins, which we termed ENHANCED RNA INTERFERENCE‐1‐LIKE‐1 (ERIL1), in chloroplast function. In vitro assays with AtERIL1 proved that the conserved 3′–5′ exonuclease activity is shared among all homologues studied. Confocal microscopy revealed that ERL1, a nucleus‐encoded protein, is targeted to the chloroplast. To gain insight into its role in plants, we used Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis thaliana plants that constitutively overexpress or suppress ERIL1. In the mutant lines of both species we observed malfunctions in photosynthetic ability. Molecular analysis showed that ERIL1 participates in the processing of chloroplastic ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs). Lastly, our results suggest that the missexpression of ERIL1 may have an indirect effect on the microRNA (miRNA) pathway. Altogether our data point to an additional piece of the puzzle in the complex RNA metabolism of chloroplasts.     

The rice yellow mottle virus P1 protein exhibits dual functions to suppress and activate gene silencing

In plants RNA silencing is a host defense mechanism against viral infection, in which double‐strand RNA is processed into 21–24‐nt short interfering RNA (siRNA). Silencing spreads from cell to cell and systemically through a sequence‐specific signal to limit the propagation of the virus. To counteract this defense mechanism, viruses encode suppressors of silencing. The P1 protein encoded by the rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) displays suppression activity with variable efficiency, according to the isolates that they originated from. Here, we show that P1 proteins from two RYMV isolates displaying contrasting suppression strength reduced local silencing induced by single‐strand and double‐strand RNA in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. This suppression was associated with a slight and a severe reduction in 21‐ and 24‐nt siRNA accumulation, respectively. Unexpectedly, cell‐to‐cell movement and systemic propagation of silencing were enhanced in P1‐expressing Nicotiana plants. When transgenically expressed in rice, P1 proteins induced specific deregulation of DCL4‐dependent endogenous siRNA pathways, whereas the other endogenous pathways were not affected. As DCL4‐dependent pathways play a key role in rice development, the expression of P1 viral proteins was associated with the same severe developmental defects in spikelets as in dcl4 mutants. Overall, our results demonstrate that a single viral protein displays multiple effects on both endogenous and exogenous silencing, not only in a suppressive but also in an enhancive manner. This suggests that P1 proteins play a key role in maintaining a subtle equilibrium between defense and counter‐defense mechanisms, to insure efficient virus multiplication and the preservation of host integrity.