Dynamics and functional differences between dendroaspin and rhodostomin: Insights into protein scaffolds in integrin recognition

Dendroaspin (Den) and rhodostomin (Rho) are snake venom proteins containing a PRGDMP motif. Although Den and Rho have different 3D structures, they are highly potent integrin inhibitors. To study their structure, function, and dynamics relationships, we expressed Den and Rho in Pichia pastoris. The recombinant Den and Rho inhibited platelet aggregation with the K_I values of 149.8 and 83.2 nM. Cell adhesion analysis showed that Den was 3.7 times less active than Rho when inhibiting the integrin αIIbβ3 and 2.5 times less active when inhibiting the integrin αvβ3. In contrast, Den and Rho were similarly active when inhibiting the integrin α5β1 with the IC₅₀ values of 239.8 and 256.8 nM. NMR analysis showed that recombinant Den and Rho have different 3D conformations for their arginyl‐glycyl‐aspartic acid (RGD) motif. However, the comparison with Rho showed that the docking of Den into integrin αvβ3 resulted in a similar number of contacts. Analysis of the dynamic properties of the RGD loop in Den and Rho showed that they also had different dynamic properties. These results demonstrate that protein scaffolds affect the function, structure, and dynamics of their RGD motif.     

Structural and functional aspects of decorsin and its analog as recognized by integrin αIIbβ3

Decorsin is an antagonist of platelet glycoprotein integrin αIIbβ3 on platelets; the protein is 39 amino acids long with three disulfide bridges in its tertiary structure. To demonstrate decorsin’s mechanism of action, we applied the computational virtual technique and platelet aggregation inhibition assay, which showed that the flanking amino-acid residues of the Arg–Gly–Asp (RGD) motif play an important role in platelet aggregation. The computational simulations revealed that the RGD motif mainly contributes to the stability of the complex when decorsion interacts with integrin αIIbβ3. However, the C-terminal residues, such as 34A→W and 35D→R, was also found to possibly play a key role in their binding structures. Moreover, we produced a decorsin analog (A34W plus D35R decorsin), in which the 34A (alanine) and 35D (aspartic acid) residues were respectively substituted by W (tryptophan) and R (arginine). This isoform was then recombinantly expressed in Escherichia coli. Intriguingly, this mutant type showed higher anti-platelet aggregation activity than the wildtype. Our study may further contribute to finding decorsin mutants with higher anti-platelet aggregation activity.     

The differential amino acid requirement within osteopontin in α4 and α9 integrin-mediated cell binding and migration

Osteopontin (OPN) contains at least two major integrin recognition domains, Arg159-Gly-Asp161 (RGD) and Ser162-Val-Val-Tyr-Gly-Leu-Arg168 (SVVYGLR), recognized by αvβ3 and α5β1 and α4 and α9 integrins, respectively. OPN is specifically cleaved by thrombin and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3 or MMP-7 at a position of Arg168/Ser169 (R/S) and Gly166/Leu167 (G/L), respectively. We in this study examined the requirement of residues within SVVYGLR for the α4 and α9 integrin recognition and how MMP-cleavage influences the integrin recognition. The residues, Val164, Tyr165, and Leu167 are critical for α4 and α9 integrin recognition in both cell adhesion and cell migration. The residue Arg168 is additionally required for α9 integrin recognition in cell adhesion and this explains why α9 integrin binds to only thrombin cleaved form of OPN. α4 integrin is able to bind to SVVYG (MMP-cleaved form of RAA OPN-N half), while α9 integrin is not, supporting the above notion that Arg168 is additionally required for α9 integrin-mediated cell adhesion. The residue Val163 is important for α4, but not for α9 integrin recognition in cell migration. Importantly, we found that the replacement of Arg168 by Ala (R168A mutant) induces the augmentation of cell migration via α4 and α9 integrins.     

Ligand density and integrin repertoire regulate cellular response to LPA

Engagement of integrin receptors by the extracellular matrix (ECM) protein fibronectin (FN) activates intracellular signaling, cytoskeletal reorganization and cellular tension. The soluble factor lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) acts through Rho GTPase and its effector Rho kinase (ROCK) to enhance α5β1 integrin-mediated cell spreading on the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) cell-binding domain of FN. A second cell-binding site for α4 integrins resides in the CS1 segment of the alternatively spliced V region of FN. We show here that LPA treatment of α4β1-expressing CHOα4 cells on FN induced a significant decrease in spread cell area. LPA also decreased apoptosis induced by serum-deprivation in CHOα4 and human A375 melanoma cells in an α4β1-dependent manner. Improvement in cell viability and changes in cell morphology were dependent on ROCK and on the number of substrate binding sites for α4β1. LPA signaling combined with α4β1-mediated adhesion appears to sustain cell viability in situations where FN matrix is limiting. Such cooperation may impact dynamic cellular events such as wound healing, fibrosis, and metastasis.     

Adhesion of Cultured Human Kidney Mesangial Cells to Native Entactin: Role of Integrin Receptors

Entactin is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein which binds to laminin and is found in most renal basement membranes and in the glomerular mesangial matrix. In the present study, we have characterized specific integrin receptors on cultured human mesangial cells (CHMC) responsible for adhesion to native entactin. The integrin receptors α2,β1, α3,β1, α5,β1, αv,β3, αv,β5, and α6 complexed with either β1 or β4 could be immune precipitated from detergent extracts of metabolically labeled CHMC. Adhesion assays with inhibitory anti integrin monoclonal antibodies (mab) demonstrated that CHMC use both αv,β3 and a β1-containing integrin to bind surfaces coated with native entactin. Optimal binding of CHMC to native entactin required the participation of cations. Using wild type and mutant recombinant entactin fragments, the binding site for the αv,β3 receptor was localized to the RGD sequence on the rod or E domain of entactin. CHMC adhesion to mutant full length recombinant entactin ligands lacking the E domain RGD sequence confirmed the presence of ligand binding site(s) for β1 integrin receptor(s). Differences in CHMC binding characteristics to recombinant and full length entactin compared to native bovine basement membrane entactin were observed. This suggests that tertiary molecular structure may contribute to entactin ligand binding properties. Primary amino acid residue sequences and tertiary structure of entactin may play roles in forming functional cell attachment sites in native basement membrane entactin.     

Mutagenesis studies of the β I domain metal ion binding sites on integrin αVβ3 ligand binding affinity

Three divalent cation binding sites in the integrin β I domain have been shown to regulate ligand binding and adhesion. However, the degree of ligand binding and adhesion varies among integrins. The αLβ2 and α4β7 integrins show an increase in ligand binding affinity and adhesion when one of their ADMIDAS (adjacent to MIDAS, or the metal ion-dependent adhesion site) residues is mutated. By contrast, the α2β1, α5β1, and αIIbβ3 integrins show a decrease in binding affinity and adhesion when their ADMIDAS is mutated. Our study here indicated that integrin αVβ3 had lower affinity when the ADMIDAS was mutated. By comparing the primary sequences of these integrin subunits, we propose that one residue associated with the MIDAS (β3 Ala(252)) may account for these differences. In the β1 integrin subunit, the corresponding residue is also Ala, whereas in both β2 and β7 integrin subunits, it is Asp. We mutated the β3 residue Ala(252) to Asp and combined this mutant with mutations of one or two ADMIDAS residues. The mutant A252D showed reduced ligand binding affinity and adhesion. The ligand binding affinity and adhesion were increased when this A252D mutant was paired with mutations of one ADMIDAS residue. But when paired with mutations of two ADMIDAS residues the mutant nearly abolished ligand-binding ability, which was restored by the activating glycosylation mutation. Our study suggests that the variation of this residue contributes to the different ligand binding affinities and adhesion abilities among different integrin families.     

Site‐specific inhibition of integrin αvβ3‐vitronectin association by a ser‐asp‐val sequence through an Arg‐Gly‐Asp‐binding site of the integrin

A functional proteomic technology using protein chip and molecular simulation was used to demonstrate a novel biomolecular interaction between P11, a peptide containing the Ser‐Asp‐Val (SDV) sequence and integrin αvβ3. P11 (HSDVHK) is a novel antagonistic peptide of integrin αvβ3 screened from hexapeptide library through protein chip system. An in silico docking study and competitive protein chip assay revealed that the SDV sequence of P11 is able to create a stable inhibitory complex onto the vitronectin‐binding site of integrin αvβ3. The Arg‐Gly‐Asp (RGD)‐binding site recognition by P11 was site specific because the P11 was inactive for the complex formation of a denatured form of integrin–vitronectin. P11 showed a strong antagonism against αvβ3‐GRGDSP interaction with an IC₅₀ value of 25.72±3.34 nM, whereas the value of GRGDSP peptide was 1968.73±444.32 nM. The binding‐free energies calculated from the docking simulations for each P11 and RGD peptide were ?3.99 and ?3.10 kcal/mol, respectively. The free energy difference between P11 and RGD corresponds to approximately a 4.5‐fold lower K_i value for the P11 than the RGD peptide. The binding orientation of the docked P11 was similar to the crystal structure of the RGD in αvβ3. The analyzed docked poses suggest that a divalent metal–ion coordination was a common driving force for the formation of both SDV/αvβ3 and RGD/αvβ3 complexes. This is the first report on the specific recognition of the RGD‐binding site of αvβ3 by a non‐RGD containing peptide using a computer‐assisted proteomic approach.     

Mapping of heparin/heparan sulfate binding sites on αvβ3 integrin by molecular docking

Heparin/heparan sulfate interact with growth factors, chemokines, extracellular proteins, and receptors. Integrins are αβ heterodimers that serve as receptors for extracellular proteins, regulate cell behavior, and participate in extracellular matrix assembly. Heparin binds to RGD‐dependent integrins (αIIbβ3, α5β1, αvβ3, and αvβ5) and to RGD‐independent integrins (α4β1, αXβ2, and αMβ2), but their binding sites have not been located on integrins. We report the mapping of heparin binding sites on the ectodomain of αvβ3 integrin by molecular modeling. The surface of the ectodomain was scanned with small rigid probes mimicking the sulfated domains of heparan sulfate. Docking results were clustered into binding spots. The best results were selected for further docking simulations with heparin hexasaccharide. Six potential binding spots containing lysine and/or arginine residues were identified on the ectodomain of αvβ3 integrin. Heparin would mostly bind to the top of the genu domain, the Calf‐I domain of the α subunit, and the top of the β subunit of RGD‐dependent integrins. Three spots were close enough from each other on the integrin surface to form an extended binding site that could interact with heparin/heparan sulfate chains. Because heparin does not bind to the same integrin site as protein ligands, no steric hindrance prevents the formation of ternary complexes comprising the integrin, its protein ligand, and heparin/heparan sulfate. The basic amino acid residues predicted to interact with heparin are conserved in the sequences of RGD‐dependent but not of RGD‐independent integrins suggesting that heparin/heparan sulfate could bind to different sites on these two integrin subfamilies. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Near-infrared fluorescent divalent RGD ligand for integrin α(v)β(3)-targeted optical imaging

A new near-infrared fluorescent compound containing two cyclic RGD motifs, cypate-[c(RGDfK)](2) (1), was synthesized based on a carbocyanine fluorophore bearing two carboxylic acid groups (cypate) for integrin α(v)β(3)-targeting. Compared with its monovalent counterpart cypate-c(RGDfK) (2), 1 exhibited remarkable improvements in integrin α(v)β(3) binding affinity and tumor uptake in nude mice of A549. The results suggest that cypate-linked divalent ligands can serve as an important molecular platform for exploring receptor-targeted optical imaging and treatment of various diseases.     

Integrin α6β4 cooperates with LPA signaling to stimulate Rac through AKAP-Lbc-mediated RhoA activation

The α(6)β(4) integrin promotes carcinoma invasion through its ability to promote directed migration and polarization of carcinoma cells. In this study, we explore how the α(6)β(4) integrin cooperates with lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) to activate Rho and Rac small GTPases. Through the use of dominant negative Rho constructs, C3 exotransferase, and Rho kinase inhibitor, we find that Rho is critical for LPA-dependent chemotaxis and lamellae formation. However, utilization of specific Rho isoforms depends on integrin α(6)β(4) expression status. Integrin α(6)β(4)-negative MDA-MB-435 cells utilize only RhoC for motility, whereas integrin α(6)β(4)-expressing cells utilize RhoC but additionally activate and utilize RhoA for LPA-dependent cell motility and lamellae formation. Notably, the activation of RhoA by cooperative LPA and integrin α(6)β(4) signaling requires the Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor AKAP-Lbc. We also determine that integrin α(6)β(4) cannot activate Rac1 directly but promotes LPA-mediated Rac1 activation that is dependent on RhoA activity and de novo β(1) integrin ligation. Finally, we find that the regulation of Rac1 and RhoA in response to LPA is differentially regulated by phosphodiesterases, PKA, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, thus supporting their spatially distinct compartmentalization. In summary, signaling from integrin α(6)β(4) facilitates LPA-stimulated chemotaxis through preferential activation of RhoA, which, in turn, facilitates activation of Rac1.     

Integrin α8β1 regulates adhesion,migration and proliferation of human intestinal crypt cells via a predominant RhoA/ROCK‐dependent mechanism

Background. Integrins are transmembrane αβ heterodimer receptors that function as structural and functional bridges between the cytoskeleton and ECM (extracellular matrix) molecules. The RGD (arginine‐glycine‐aspartate tripeptide motif)‐dependent integrin α8β1 has been shown to be involved in various cell functions in neuronal and mesenchymal‐derived cell types. Its role in epithelial cells remains unknown. Results. Integrin α8β1 was found to be expressed in the crypt cell population of the human intestine but was absent from differentiating and mature epithelial cells of the villus. The function of α8β1 in epithelial crypt cells was investigated at the cellular level using normal HIECs (human intestinal epithelial cells). Specific knockdown of α8 subunit expression using an shRNA (small‐hairpin RNA) approach showed that α8β1 plays important roles in RGD‐dependent cell adhesion, migration and proliferation via a RhoA/ROCK (Rho‐associated kinase)‐dependent mechanism as demonstrated by active RhoA quantification and pharmacological inhibition of ROCK. Moreover, loss of α8β1, through RhoA/ROCK, impairs FA (focal adhesion) complex integrity as demonstrated by faulty vinculin recruitment. Conclusions. Integrin α8β1 is expressed in epithelial cells. In intestinal crypt cells, α8β1 is closely involved in the regulation of adhesion, migration and cell proliferation via a predominant RhoA/ROCK‐dependent mechanism. These results suggest an important role for this integrin in intestinal crypt cell homoeostasis.     

RGD cadherins and α2β1 integrin in cancer metastasis: A dangerous liaison

We propose a new cadherin family classification comprising epithelial cadherins (cadherin 17 [CDH17], cadherin 16, VE-cadherin, cadherin 6 and cadherin 20) containing RGD motifs within their sequences. Expression of some RGD cadherins is associated with aggressive forms of cancer during the late stages of metastasis, and CDH17 and VE-cadherin have emerged as critical actors in cancer metastasis. After binding to α2β1 integrin, these cadherins promote integrin β1 activation, and thereby cell adhesion, invasion and proliferation, in liver and lung metastasis. Activation of α2β1 integrin provokes an affinity increase for type IV collagen, a major component of the basement membrane and a critical partner for cell anchoring in liver and other metastatic organs. Activation of α2β1 integrin by RGD motifs breaks an old paradigm of integrin classification and supports an important role of this integrin in cancer metastasis. Recently, synthetic peptides containing the RGD motif of CDH17 elicited highly specific and selective antibodies that block the ability of CDH17 RGD to activate α2β1 integrin. These monoclonal antibodies inhibit metastatic colonization in orthotopic mouse models of liver and lung metastasis for colorectal cancer and melanoma, respectively. Hopefully, blocking the cadherin RGD ligand capacity will give us control over the integrin activity in solid tumors metastasis, paving the way for development of new agents of cancer treatment.     

Cross-talk between integrin α6β4 and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) through direct α6β4 binding to IGF1 and subsequent α6β4-IGF1-IGF1R ternary complex formation in anchorage-independent conditions

Integrin αvβ3 plays a role in insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) signaling (integrin-IGF1 receptor (IGF1R) cross-talk). The specifics of the cross-talk are, however, unclear. In a current model, "ligand occupancy" of αvβ3 (i.e. the binding of extracellular matrix proteins) enhances signaling induced by IGF1 binding to IGF1R. We recently reported that IGF1 directly binds to αvβ3 and induces αvβ3-IGF1-IGF1R ternary complex formation. Consistently, the integrin binding-defective IGF1 mutant (R36E/R37E) is defective in inducing ternary complex formation and IGF signaling, but it still binds to IGF1R. Like αvβ3, integrin α6β4 is overexpressed in many cancers and is implicated in cancer progression. Here, we discovered that α6β4 directly bound to IGF1, but not to R36E/R37E. Grafting the β4 sequence WPNSDP (residues 167-172), which corresponds to the specificity loop of β3, to integrin β1 markedly enhanced IGF1 binding to β1, suggesting that the WPNSDP sequence is involved in IGF1 recognition. WT IGF1 induced α6β4-IGF1-IGF1R ternary complex formation, whereas R36E/R37E did not. When cells were attached to matrix, exogenous IGF1 or α6β4 expression had little or no effect on intracellular signaling. When cell-matrix adhesion was reduced (in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-coated plates), IGF1 induced intracellular signaling and enhanced cell survival in an α6β4-dependent manner. Also IGF1 enhanced colony formation in soft agar in an α6β4-dependent manner. These results suggest that IGF binding to α6β4 plays a major role in IGF signaling in anchorage-independent conditions, which mimic the in vivo environment, and is a novel therapeutic target.     

RGD-dependent growth of maize calluses and immunodetection of an integrin-like protein

When maize calluses are grown in the presence of the RGD peptide, important morphological changes are observed indicating the presence of a likely RGD-binding receptor. Polyclonal antibodies generated against the human β1 integrin subunit, the platelet integrin αIIbβ3 (P23) and antibodies specific for either the β3 platelet chain or the αIIb polypeptide cross-react with glycoproteins in Western blot analyses. Immunoprecipitation assays indicate that this maize integrin-like protein shares structural similarities with the animal αIIbβ3 complex. We also show that AcAt2, a polyclonal antibody raised against Arabidopsis proteins purified on an RGD column, interacts with a maize protein.     

Role of N-terminal residues in Aβ interactions with integrin receptor and cell surface

beta-Amyloid (Aβ) is the primary protein component of senile plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is believed to play a role in its pathology. To date, the mechanism of action of Aβ in AD is unclear. We and others have observed that Aβ interacts either with or in the vicinity of the α6 sub-unit of integrin, and believe this may be important in its interaction with neuronal cells. In this study, we used confocal microscopy and flow cytometry to explore the residue specific interactions of Aβ40 with the cell surface and the α6 integrin receptor sub-unit. We probed the importance of the RHD sequence in Aβ40 and found that removal of the residues or their mutation using the Aβ8-40 or the D7N early onset AD sequence, respectively, led to a greater interaction between Aβ40 and an antibody bound to the α6-integrin sub-unit, as measured by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). These results suggest that the RHD sequence of Aβ40 does not mediate Aβ–α6 integrin interactions. However, the cyclic RGD mimicking peptide, Cilengitide, reduced the measured interaction between Aβ40 fibrils without the RHD sequence and an antibody bound to the α6-integrin sub-unit. We further probed the role of electrostatic forces on Aβ40–cell interactions and observed that the Aβ sequence that included the N-terminal segment of the peptide had reduced cellular binding at low salt concentrations, suggesting that its first 7 residues contribute to an electrostatic repulsion for the cell surface. These findings contribute to our understanding of Aβ–cell surface interactions and may provide insight into development of novel strategies to block Aβ–cell interactions that contribute to pathology in Alzheimer's disease.     

Cyclic RGD peptides interfere with binding of the Helicobacter pylori protein CagL to integrins αVβ3 and α5β1

The human pathogen Helicobacter pylori that may cause different gastric diseases exploits integrins for infection of gastric cells. The H. pylori protein CagL present on the outer region of the type IV secretion pilus contains an RGD sequence (-Arg-Gly-Asp-) that enables binding to cells presenting integrins α5β1 and αVβ3. This interaction can be inhibited with conformationally designed cyclic RGD peptides derived from the CagL epitope -Ala-Leu-Arg-Gly-Asp-Leu-Ala-. The inhibition of the CagL-αVβ3 interaction by different RGD peptides strongly suggests the importance of the RGD motif for CagL binding. CagL point mutants (RAD, RGA) show decreased affinity to integrin αVβ3. Furthermore, structure-activity relationship studies with cyclic RGD peptides in a spatial screening approach show the distinct influence of the three-dimensional arrangement of RGD motif on the ability to interfere with this interaction. Resulting from these studies, similar structural requirements for the CagL epitope as previously suggested for other ligands of integrin αVβ3 are proposed.     

Syndecan-1 and -4 differentially regulate oncogenic K-ras dependent cell invasion into collagen through α2β1 integrin and MT1-MMP

Syndecans function as co-receptors for integrins on different matrixes. Recently, syndecan-1 has been shown to be important for α2β1 integrin-mediated adhesion to collagen in tumor cells by regulating cell adhesion and migration on two-dimensional collagen. However, the function of syndecans in supporting α2β1 integrin interactions with three-dimensional (3D) collagen is less well studied. Using loss-of-function and overexpression experiments we show that in 3D collagen syndecan-4 supports α2β1-mediated collagen matrix contraction. Cell invasion through type I collagen containing 3D extracellular matrix (ECM) is driven by α2β1 integrin and membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP). Here we show that mutational activation of K-ras correlates with increased expression of α2β1 integrin, MT1-MMP, syndecan-1, and syndecan-4. While K-ras-induced α2β1 integrin and MT1-MMP are positive regulators of invasion, silencing and overexpression of syndecans demonstrate that these proteins inhibit cell invasion into collagen. Taken together, these data demonstrate the existence of a complex interplay between integrin α2β1, MT1-MMP, and syndecans in the invasion of K-ras mutant cells in 3D collagen that may represent a mechanism by which tumor cells become more invasive and metastatic.     

将RGD模体改变为RGDNM可减弱Echistatin对血小板聚集的抑制但增强血管新生的抑制作用

为了研究去整合素echistatin RGD(Arg-Gly-Asp) 模体周边氨基酸突变后对其生物学功能的影响,根据echistatin序列设计合成6个片段,利用重叠延伸PCR法合成cDNA,使echistatin RGD模体周边序列变为ARGDNM (D27→N),与载体pTXB1连接后转化E.coli BL21(DE3),建立echistatin (ARGDNM)的表达体系．工程菌经IPTG诱导后融合蛋白表达量占菌体总蛋白约30%,几丁质亲和纯化后,DTT裂解释放目的蛋白分子量约5.4 kD．体外血小板聚集和体内鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜 (chick chorioallantoic membrane, CAM)血管新生实验结果表明,echistatin (ARGDNM)抑制血小板聚集的作用减弱,而其抑制血管新生的作用增强．RGD模体周围氨基酸的改变影响了去整合素的生物学功能,echistatin (ARGDNM)增强了与αⅤβ3结合的特异性,本工作为研究特异性更强的去整合素药物奠定了基础．     

The P2Y2 nucleotide receptor interacts with alphav integrins to activate Go and induce cell migration

Extracellular ATP and UTP induce chemotaxis, or directed cell migration, by stimulating the G protein-coupled P2Y(2) nucleotide receptor (P2Y(2)R). Previously, we found that an arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) integrin binding domain in the P2Y(2)R enables this receptor to interact selectively with alpha(v)beta(3) and alpha(V)beta(5) integrins, an interaction that is prevented by mutation of the RGD sequence to arginine-glycine-glutamic acid (RGE) (Erb, L., Liu, J., Ockerhausen, J., Kong, Q., Garrad, R. C., Griffin, K., Neal, C., Krugh, B., Santiago-Perez, L. I., Gonzalez, F. A., Gresham, H. D., Turner, J. T., and Weisman, G. A. (2001) J. Cell Biol. 153, 491-501). This RGD domain also was found to be necessary for coupling the P2Y(2)R to G(o)- but not G(q)-mediated intracellular calcium mobilization, leading us to investigate the role of P2Y(2)R interaction with integrins in nucleotide-induced chemotaxis. Here we show that mutation of the RGD sequence to RGE in the human P2Y(2)R expressed in 1321N1 astrocytoma cells completely prevented UTP-induced chemotaxis as well as activation of G(o), Rac, and Vav2, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rac. UTP also increased expression of vitronectin, an extracellular matrix protein that is a ligand for alpha(v)beta(3)/beta(5) integrins, in cells expressing the wild-type but not the RGE mutant P2Y(2)R. P2Y(2)R-mediated chemotaxis, Rac and Vav2 activation, and vitronectin up-regulation were inhibited by pretreatment of the cells with anti-alpha(v)beta(5) integrin antibodies, alpha(v) integrin antisense oligonucleotides, or the G(i/o) inhibitor, pertussis toxin. Thus, the RGD-dependent interaction between the P2Y(2)R and alpha(v) integrins is necessary for the P2Y(2)R to activate G(o) and to initiate G(o)-mediated signaling events leading to chemotaxis.     

Function and conformation analyses of an aspartate substitution of the invariant glycine in the integrin βI domain α1-α1′ helix

We showed that the αLβ2 integrin with the non-functional mutation G150D cannot be induced with Mg/EGTA to express the mAb KIM127 epitope, which reports the leg-extended conformation. We extended the study to the αIIbβ3, an integrin without an αI domain. The equivalent mutation, i.e. G161D, also resulted in an expressible, but non-adhesive αIIbβ3 integrin. An NMR study of synthetic peptides spanning the α1-α1′ helix of the β3 I domain shows that both wild-type and mutant peptides are α-helical. However, whereas in the wild-type peptide this helix is continuous, the mutant presents a discontinuity, or kink, precisely at the site of mutation G161D. Our results suggest that the mutation may lock integrin heterodimers in a bent conformation that prevents integrin activation via conformational extension.