Comparative genomics reveal novel heat shock regulatory mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive bacteria

Multiple regulatory mechanisms for coping with stress co-exist in low G+C Gram-positive bacteria. Among these, the HrcA and CtsR repressors control distinct regulons in the model organism, Bacillus subtilis. We recently identified an orthologue of the CtsR regulator of stress response in the major pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus. Sequence analysis of the S. aureus genome revealed the presence of potential CtsR operator sites not only upstream from genes encoding subunits of the Clp ATP-dependent protease, as in B. subtilis, but also, unexpectedly, within the promoter regions of the dnaK and groESL operons known to be specifically controlled by HrcA. The tandem arrangement of the CtsR and HrcA operators suggests a novel mode of dual heat shock regulation by these two repressors. The S. aureus ctsR and hrcA genes were cloned under the control of the PxylA xylose-inducible promoter and used to demonstrate dual regulation of the dnaK and groESL operons by both CtsR and HrcA, using B. subtilis as a heterologous host. Direct binding by both repressors was shown in vitro by gel mobility shift and DNase I footprinting experiments using purified S. aureus CtsR and HrcA proteins. DeltactsR, DeltahrcA and DeltactsRDeltahrcA mutants of S. aureus were constructed, indicating that the two repressors are not redundant but, instead, act together synergistically to maintain low basal levels of expression of the dnaK and groESL operons in the absence of stress. This novel regulatory mode appears to be specific to Staphylococci.     

A simple framework to describe the regulation of gene expression in prokaryotes

Based on the bimolecular mass action law and the derived mass conservation laws, we propose a mathematical framework in order to describe the regulation of gene expression in prokaryotes. It is shown that the derived models have all the qualitative properties of the activation and inhibition regulatory mechanisms observed in experiments. The basic construction considers genes as templates for protein production, where regulation processes result from activators or repressors connecting to DNA binding sites. All the parameters in the models have a straightforward biological meaning. After describing the general properties of the basic mechanisms of positive and negative gene regulation, we apply this framework to the self-regulation of the trp operon and to the genetic switch involved in the regulation of the lac operon. One of the consequences of this approach is the existence of conserved quantities depending on the initial conditions that tune bifurcations of fixed points. This leads naturally to a simple explanation of threshold effects as observed in some experiments.     

植物转录抑制子的结构特征及其作用机理

转录因子依转录调控能力可分为激活子和抑制子。植物 转录抑制蛋白的分类依据很多, 从作用方式上可分为主动抑制子和被动抑制子两大类; 根据与DNA结合的方式则可分为锌指类、MYB类、AP2/EREBP类、bHLH类和bZIP类等。植物主 动抑制子通过其含有的抑制域对转录直接起抑制作用。抑制域又可分很多类, 但多数为含有类似EAR基序的保守性基序, 其上具有几个保守性亮氨酸残基。植物转录抑制子主要通过对激活子或基本转录复合物产生作用及改变染色体结构3种方式来抑制目标基因的转录。有关植物转录抑制子的研究虽很欠缺, 但以拟南芥SUPERMAN等抑制子的EAR基序为代表的研究表明, 抑制域是阐明植物转录抑制子功能和下游基因表达调控机理的核心对象, 而融合抑制子沉默技术(CRES-T)也为人为调控基因沉默带来了新的技术手段。     

人工microRNA干扰DREB亚族A-5组转录抑制子基因增强了拟南芥对低温和高盐胁迫的耐受性

转录抑制子是一类与DNA的特异位点结合并抑制其附近基因转录的蛋白质,主要通过与转录激活子或基本转录复合物发生作用以及引起染色质重排等3种方式来抑制目标基因的转录.DREB类转录因子的A-5组中共有6个转录抑制子,其功能和作用机制还有待进一步研究.通过设计人工microRNA-A5(amiRNA-A5)使其较特异地作用这...     

Negative regulation of the bovine papillomavirus E5, E6, and E7 oncogenes by the viral E1 and E2 genes.

Papillomaviruses induce benign squamous epithelial lesions that infrequently are associated with uncontrolled growth or malignant conversion. The virus-encoded oncogenes are clearly under negative regulation since papillomaviruses can latently infect cells and since different levels of viral oncogene expression are seen within the layers of differentiating infected epitheliomas. We used bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) to investigate the mechanisms involved in the negative regulation of transformation. We found that the following two distinct and interacting mechanisms negatively regulate BPV-1 transformation effected by virally encoded trans-acting factors: (i) E2 repressors suppress transformation by the E6 and E7 oncogenes, and (ii) E1 and the E2 transactivator suppress transformation by the E6, E7, and E5 oncogenes. These systems interact in that the E2 repressors function to relieve the transformation suppression effected by the E1 and E2 transactivator genes. A BPV-1 mutant that lacked E2 repressors and E1 had greatly augmented transformation capacity. Analysis of this mutant revealed that the enhanced transformation was due to expression of the E6 and E7 genes in the absence of E5, revealing a previously unappreciated potency and synergy for the BPV-1 E6 and E7 oncogenes.     

Cooperative binding of lambda repressors to sites separated by integral turns of the DNA helix

Lambda repressors bind cooperatively to adjacent pairs of operator sites. Here we show that repressors bind cooperatively to pairs of operator sites whose centers have been separated by five or six turns of the helix. No cooperativity is observed when the centers of these sites are on opposite sides of the DNA helix. Cooperativity depends upon the same part of the protein (the carboxyl domain) that mediates cooperativity when the sites are adjacent. As the repressors bind, the DNA between the sites becomes alternately sensitive and resistant to DNAase I cleavage at half turn intervals. We suggest that when repressors bind cooperatively to separated sites, the DNA forms a loop, thus allowing the two repressors to touch.     

Drosophila melanogaster P Transposable Elements: Mechanisms of Transposition and Regulation

The molecular mechanisms that control P element transposition and determine its tissue specificity remain incompletely understood, although much information has been compiled about this element in the last decade. This review summarizes the currently available information about P element transposition, P-M hybrid dysgenesis and P cytotype features, P element-encoded repressors, and regulation of transposition.     

ClpP of Streptococcus salivarius is a novel member of the dually regulated class of stress response genes in gram-positive bacteria

Nucleotide sequence analysis of the Streptococcus salivarius clpP locus revealed potential binding sites for both the CtsR and HrcA repressors. Dual regulation by HrcA and CtsR was demonstrated by using Bacillus subtilis as a heterologous host, and CtsR was shown to bind directly to the clpP promoter sequence. This is the first example of a clpP gene under the control of HrcA.     

Conservation and diversity in the immunity regions of wild phages with the immunity specificity of phage lambda

The gene regulatory circuitry of phage lambda is among the best-understood circuits. Much of the circuitry centres around the immunity region, which includes genes for two repressors, CI and Cro, and their cis-acting sites. Related phages, termed lambdoid phages, have different immunity regions, but similar regulatory circuitry and genome organization to that of lambda, and show a mosaic organization, arising by recombination between lambdoid phages. We sequenced the immunity regions of several wild phages with the immunity specificity of lambda, both to determine whether natural variation exists in regulation, and to analyse conservation and variability in a region rich in well-studied regulatory elements. CI, Cro and their cis-acting sites are almost identical to those in lambda, implying that regulatory mechanisms controlled by the immunity region are conserved. A segment adjacent to one of the operator regions is also conserved, and may be a novel regulatory element. In most isolates, different alleles of two regulatory proteins (N and CII) flank the immunity region; possibly the lysis-lysogeny decision is more variable among isolates. Extensive mosaicism was observed for several elements flanking the immunity region. Very short sequence elements or microhomologies were also identified. Our findings suggest mechanisms by which fine-scale mosaicism arises.     

Two yeast PUF proteins negatively regulate a single mRNA

mRNA stability and translation are regulated by protein repressors that bind 3'-untranslated regions. PUF proteins provide a paradigm for these regulatory molecules: like other repressors, they inhibit translation, enhance mRNA decay, and promote poly(A) removal. Here we show that a single mRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encoding the HO endonuclease, is regulated by two distinct PUF proteins, Puf4p and Mpt5p. These proteins bind to adjacent sites and can co-occupy the mRNA. Both proteins are required for full repression and deadenylation in vivo; their removal dramatically stabilizes the mRNA. The two proteins act through overlapping but non-identical mechanisms: repression by Puf4p is dependent on deadenylation, whereas repression by Mpt5p can occur through additional mechanisms. Combinatorial action of the two regulatory proteins may allow responses to specific environmental cues and be common in 3'-untranslated region-mediated control.     

Roots: Molecular basis of gene expression: Origins from the Pajama experiment

The Pajama (Pardee, Jacob, Monod) experiment provided a breakthrough in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which gene expression is regulated. Today, twenty-five years later it provides a paradigm for thinking about problems of gene expression, such as growth regulation and differentiation. From this experiment emerged entities such as repressors, regulatory genes, the operon as a group of jointly controlled genes, and messenger RNA.