Two surfaces of a conserved interdomain linker differentially affect output from the RST sensing module of the Bacillus subtilis stressosome

The stressosome is a 1.8-MDa cytoplasmic complex that conveys environmental signals to the σ(B) stress factor of Bacillus subtilis. A functionally irreducible complex contains multiple copies of three proteins: the RsbRA coantagonist, RsbS antagonist, and RsbT serine-threonine kinase. Homologues of these proteins are coencoded in different genome contexts in diverse bacteria, forming a versatile sensing and transmission module called RST after its common constituents. However, the signaling pathway within the stressosome itself is not well defined. The N-terminal, nonheme globin domains of RsbRA project from the stressosome and are presumed to channel sensory input to the C-terminal STAS domains that form the complex core. A conserved, 13-residue α-helical linker connects these domains. We probed the in vivo role of the linker using alanine scanning mutagenesis, assaying stressosome output in B. subtilis via a σ(B)-dependent reporter fusion. Substitutions at four conserved residues increased output 4- to 30-fold in unstressed cells, whereas substitutions at four nonconserved residues significantly decreased output. The periodicity of these effects supports a model in which RsbRA functions as a dimer in vivo, with the linkers forming parallel paired helices via a conserved interface. The periodicity further suggests that the opposite, nonconserved faces make additional contacts important for efficient stressosome operation. These results establish that the linker influences stressosome output under steady-state conditions. However, the stress response phenotypes of representative linker substitutions provide less support for the notion that the N-terminal globin domain senses acute environmental challenge and transmits this information via the linker helix.     

Functional and structural characterization of RsbU, a stress signaling protein phosphatase 2C

RsbU is a positive regulator of the activity of sigmaB, the general stress-response sigma factor of Gram+ microorganisms. The N-terminal domain of this protein has no significant sequence homology with proteins of known function, whereas the C-terminal domain is similar to the catalytic domains of PP2C-type phosphatases. The phosphatase activity of RsbU is stimulated greatly during the response to stress by associating with a kinase, RsbT. This association leads to the induction of sigmaB activity. Here we present data on the activation process and demonstrate in vivo that truncations in the N-terminal region of RsbU are deleterious for the activation of RsbU. This conclusion is supported by comparisons of the phosphatase activities of full-length and a truncated form of RsbU in vitro. Our determination of the crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of RsbU from Bacillus subtilis reveals structural similarities to the regulatory domains from ubiquitous protein phosphatases and a conserved domain of sigma-factors, illuminating the activation processes of phosphatases and the evolution of "partner switching." Finally, the molecular basis of kinase recruitment by the RsbU phosphatase is discussed by comparing RsbU sequences from bacteria that either possess or lack RsbT.     

Relative levels and fractionation properties of Bacillus subtilis sigma(B) and its regulators during balanced growth and stress.

sigma B is a secondary sigma factor that controls the general stress response in Bacillus subtilis. sigma B-dependent genes are activated when sigma B is released from an inhibitory complex with an anti-sigma B protein (RsbW) and becomes free to associate with RNA polymerase. Two separate pathways, responding either to a drop in intracellular ATP levels or to environmental stress (e.g., heat, ethanol, or salt), cause the release of sigma B from RsbW. rsbR, rsbS, rsbT, and rsbU are four genes now recognized as the upstream half of an operon that includes sigB (sigma B) and its principal regulators. Using reporter gene assays, we find that none of these four genes are essential for stationary-phase (i.e., ATP-dependent) activation of sigma B, but rsbU and one or more of the genes contained within an rsbR,S,T deletion are needed for stress induction of sigma B. In other experiments, Western blot (immunoblot) analyses showed that the levels of RsbR, RsbS, Rsb, and RsbU, unlike those of the sigB operon's four downstream gene products (RsbV, RsbW, RsbX and sigma B), are not elevated during sigma B activation. Gel filtration and immunoprecipitation studies did not reveal the formation of complexes between any of the four upstream sigB operon products and the products of the downstream half of the operon. Much of the detectable RsbR, RsbS, RsbT, and RsbU did, however, fractionate as a large-molecular-mass (approximately 600-kDa) aggregate which was excluded from our gel filtration matrix. The downstream sigB operon products were not present in this excluded material. The unaggregated RsbR, RsbS, and RsbU, which were retarded by the gel matrix, elated from the column earlier than expected from their molecular weights. The RsbR and RsbS fractionation profile was consistent with homodimers (60 and 30 kDa, respectively), while the RsbU appeared larger, suggesting a protein complex of approximately 90 to 100 kDa.     

A phylogenomic study of the general stress response sigma factor sigmaB of Bacillus subtilis and its regulatory proteins

Regulation of expression of the general stress regulon of Bacillus subtilis is mediated by the activation of the alternative sigma factor sigmaB. Activation of sigmaB is accomplished by a complex regulatory network involving protein-protein interactions and reversible protein phosphorylation. PSI-BLAST searches were performed and phylogenetic trees for sigmaB and its regulatory proteins were constructed. Occurrence of sigmaB is restricted to a small group of gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Listeria). Related sigma factors also involved in stress responses are present in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Streptomyces species and even in cyanobacteria (Synechocystis species). Putative regulatory proteins found in several other bacterial species can be broadly catagorized into three categories: Anti sigma factors, anti-anti sigma factors and phosphatases. Anti sigma factors are able to bind to sigma factors and are also kinases of anti sigma factor antagonists. Only in their nonphosphorylated state, these antagonists are able to bind to the anti sigma factor. Phosphorylated antagonists can be dephosphorylated by PP2C phosphatases. These phosphatases are of pivotal importance for activation of the sigma factor. Different phosphatases identified in this search contain a wide variety of domains found in signal transducing proteins (PAS/PAC, GAF, REC, HATase_c, HAMP). The HATPase_c domain found in several phosphatases most probably constitutes a serine/threonine kinase domain of anti sigma factors. Such proteins are most probably bifunctional anti-anti sigma factor kinases and phosphatases. The regulatory network of anti-anti sigma factors anti sigma factors and phosphatases is probably ancient and most likely evolved from a structurally similar network found in the Deinococcus radiodurans genome. In completely sequenced genomes of several bacterial species, some elements of the network are missing. The N-terminus of RsbU, a phosphatase activated in response to environmental stress exhibits similarities to a region in the beta chain of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetases.     

Distinctive topologies of partner-switching signaling networks correlate with their physiological roles

Regulatory networks controlling bacterial gene expression often evolve from common origins and share homologous proteins and similar network motifs. However, when functioning in different physiological contexts, these motifs may be re-arranged with different topologies that significantly affect network performance. Here we analyze two related signaling networks in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis in order to assess the consequences of their different topologies, with the aim of formulating design principles applicable to other systems. These two networks control the activities of the general stress response factor sigma(B) and the first sporulation-specific factor sigma(F). Both networks have at their core a "partner-switching" mechanism, in which an anti-sigma factor forms alternate complexes either with the sigma factor, holding it inactive, or with an anti-anti-sigma factor, thereby freeing sigma. However, clear differences in network structure are apparent: the anti-sigma factor for sigma(F) forms a long-lived, "dead-end" complex with its anti-anti-sigma factor and ADP, whereas the genes encoding sigma(B) and its network partners lie in a sigma(B)-controlled operon, resulting in positive and negative feedback loops. We constructed mathematical models of both networks and examined which features were critical for the performance of each design. The sigma(F) model predicts that the self-enhancing formation of the dead-end complex transforms the network into a largely irreversible hysteretic switch; the simulations reported here also demonstrate that hysteresis and slow turn off kinetics are the only two system properties associated with this complex formation. By contrast, the sigma(B) model predicts that the positive and negative feedback loops produce graded, reversible behavior with high regulatory capacity and fast response time. Our models demonstrate how alterations in network design result in different system properties that correlate with regulatory demands. These design principles agree with the known or suspected roles of similar networks in diverse bacteria.     

Obg, an essential GTP binding protein of Bacillus subtilis, is necessary for stress activation of transcription factor sigma(B).

sigma(B), the general stress response sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis, is activated when intracellular ATP levels fall or the bacterium experiences environmental stress. Stress activates sigma(B) by means of a collection of regulatory kinases and phosphatases (the Rsb proteins), which catalyze the release of sigma(B) from an anti-sigma factor inhibitor. By using the yeast dihybrid selection system to identify B. subtilis proteins that could interact with Rsb proteins and act as mediators of stress signaling, we isolated the GTP binding protein, Obg, as an interactor with several of these regulators (RsbT, RsbW, and RsbX). B. subtilis depleted of Obg no longer activated sigma(B) in response to environmental stress, but it retained the ability to activate sigma(B) by the ATP responsive pathway. Stress pathway components activated sigma(B) in the absence of Obg if the pathway's most upstream effector (RsbT) was synthesized in excess to the inhibitor (RsbS) from which it is normally released after stress. Thus, the Rsb proteins can function in the absence of Obg but fail to be triggered by stress. The data demonstrate that Obg, or a process under its control, is necessary to induce the stress-dependent activation of sigma(B) and suggest that Obg may directly communicate with one or more sigma(B) regulators.