Trans-editing of Cys-tRNAPro by Haemophilus influenzae YbaK protein

Prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) from all three domains of life have been shown to misactivate cysteine and to mischarge cysteine onto tRNAPro. Although most bacterial ProRSs possess an amino acid editing domain that deacylates mischarged Ala-tRNAPro, editing of Cys-tRNAPro has not been demonstrated and a double-sieve mechanism of editing does not appear to be sufficient to eliminate all misacylated tRNAPro species from the cell. It was recently shown that a ProRS paralog, the YbaK protein from Haemophilus influenzae, which is homologous to the ProRS editing domain, is capable of weakly deacylating Ala-tRNAPro. This function appears to be redundant with that of its corresponding ProRS, which contains a canonical bacterial editing domain. In the present study, we test the specificity of editing by H. influenzae YbaK and show that it efficiently edits Cys-tRNAPro and that a conserved Lys residue is essential for this activity. These findings represent the first example of an editing domain paralog possessing altered specificity and suggest that similar autonomous editing domains could act upon different mischarged tRNAs thus providing cells with enhanced proofreading potential. This work also suggests a novel mechanism of editing wherein a third sieve is used to clear Cys-tRNAPro in at least some organisms.     

Cys-tRNA(Pro) editing by Haemophilus influenzae YbaK via a novel synthetase.YbaK.tRNA ternary complex

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are multidomain enzymes that often possess two activities to ensure translational accuracy. A synthetic active site catalyzes tRNA aminoacylation, while an editing active site hydrolyzes mischarged tRNAs. Prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRS) have been shown to misacylate Cys onto tRNA(Pro), but lack a Cys-specific editing function. The synthetase-like Haemophilus influenzae YbaK protein was recently shown to hydrolyze misacylated Cys-tRNA(Pro) in trans. However, the mechanism of specific substrate selection by this single domain hydrolase is unknown. Here, we demonstrate that YbaK alone appears to lack specific tRNA recognition capabilities. Moreover, YbaK cannot compete for aminoacyl-tRNAs in the presence of elongation factor Tu, suggesting that YbaK acts before release of the aminoacyl-tRNA from the synthetase. In support of this idea, cross-linking studies reveal the formation of binary (ProRS.YbaK) and ternary (ProRS.YbaK.tRNA) complexes. The binding constants for the interaction between ProRS and YbaK are 550 nM and 45 nM in the absence and presence of tRNA(Pro), respectively. These results suggest that the specificity of trans-editing by YbaK is ensured through formation of a novel ProRS.YbaK.tRNA complex.     

Cysteine activation is an inherent in vitro property of prolyl-tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are well known for their remarkable precision in substrate selection during aminoacyl-tRNA formation. Some synthetases enhance the accuracy of this process by editing mechanisms that lead to hydrolysis of incorrectly activated and/or charged amino acids. Prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) can be divided into two structurally divergent groups, archaeal-type and bacterial-type enzymes. A striking difference between these groups is the presence of an insertion domain (approximately 180 amino acids) in the bacterial-type ProRS. Because the archaeal-type ProRS enzymes have been shown to recognize cysteine, we tested selected ProRSs from all three domains of life to determine whether cysteine activation is a general property of ProRS. Here we show that cysteine is activated by recombinant ProRS enzymes from the archaea Methanocaldococcus jannaschii and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus, from the eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and from the bacteria Aquifex aeolicus, Borrelia burgdorferi, Clostridium sticklandii, Cytophaga hutchinsonii, Deinococcus radiodurans, Escherichia coli, Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum, Novosphingobium aromaticivorans, Rhodopseudomonas palustris, and Thermus thermophilus. This non-cognate amino acid was efficiently acylated in vitro onto tRNA(Pro), and the misacylated Cys-tRNA(Pro) was not edited by ProRS. Therefore, ProRS exhibits a natural level of mischarging that is to date unequalled among the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.     

Distinct tRNA recognition strategies used by a homologous family of editing domains prevent mistranslation

Errors in protein synthesis due to mispairing of amino acids with tRNAs jeopardize cell viability. Several checkpoints to prevent formation of Ala- and Cys-tRNA^Pro have been described, including the Ala-specific editing domain (INS) of most bacterial prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) and an autonomous single-domain INS homolog, YbaK, which clears Cys-tRNA^Pro in trans. In many species where ProRS lacks an INS domain, ProXp-ala, another single-domain INS-like protein, is responsible for editing Ala-tRNA^Pro. Although the amino acid specificity of these editing domains has been established, the role of tRNA sequence elements in substrate selection has not been investigated in detail. Critical recognition elements for aminoacylation by bacterial ProRS include acceptor stem elements G72/A73 and anticodon bases G35/G36. Here, we show that ProXp-ala and INS require these same acceptor stem and anticodon elements, respectively, whereas YbaK lacks inherent tRNA specificity. Thus, these three related domains use divergent approaches to recognize tRNAs and prevent mistranslation. Whereas some editing domains have borrowed aspects of tRNA recognition from the parent aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, relaxed tRNA specificity leading to semi-promiscuous editing may offer advantages to cells.     

Species-specific differences in amino acid editing by class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are a family of enzymes responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the genetic code by specifically attaching a particular amino acid to their cognate tRNA substrates. Through primary sequence alignments, prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) have been divided into two phylogenetically divergent groups. We have been interested in understanding whether the unusual evolutionary pattern of ProRSs corresponds to functional differences as well. Previously, we showed that some features of tRNA recognition and aminoacylation are indeed group-specific. Here, we examine the species-specific differences in another enzymatic activity, namely amino acid editing. Proofreading or editing provides a mechanism by which incorrectly activated amino acids are hydrolyzed and thus prevented from misincorporation into proteins. "Prokaryotic-like" Escherichia coli ProRS has recently been shown to be capable of misactivating alanine and possesses both pretransfer and post-transfer hydrolytic editing activity against this noncognate amino acid. We now find that two ProRSs belonging to the "eukaryotic-like" group exhibit differences in their hydrolytic editing activity. Whereas ProRS from Methanococcus jannaschii is similar to E. coli in its ability to hydrolyze misactivated alanine via both pretransfer and post-transfer editing pathways, human ProRS lacks these activities. These results have implications for the selection or design of antibiotics that specifically target the editing active site of the prokaryotic-like group of ProRSs.     

Substrate specificity of bacterial prolyl-tRNA synthetase editing domain is controlled by a tunable hydrophobic pocket

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the covalent attachment of amino acids onto their cognate tRNAs. High fidelity in this reaction is crucial to the accurate decoding of genetic information and is ensured, in part, by proofreading of the newly synthesized aminoacyl-tRNAs. Prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRS) mischarge tRNA(Pro) with alanine or cysteine due to their smaller or similar sizes relative to cognate proline. Mischarged Ala-tRNA(Pro) is hydrolyzed by an editing domain (INS) present in most bacterial ProRSs. In contrast, the INS domain is unable to deacylate Cys-tRNA(Pro), which is hydrolyzed exclusively by a freestanding trans-editing domain known as YbaK. Here, we have used computational and experimental approaches to probe the molecular basis of INS domain alanine specificity. We show that the methyl side chain of alanine binds in a well defined hydrophobic pocket characterized by conserved residues Ile-263, Leu-266, and Lys-279 and partially conserved residue Thr-277 in Escherichia coli ProRS. Site-specific mutation of these residues leads to a significant loss in Ala-tRNA(Pro) hydrolysis, and altering the size of the pocket modulates the substrate specificity. Remarkably, one ProRS INS domain variant displays a complete switch in substrate specificity from alanine to cysteine. The mutually exclusive aminoacyl-tRNA substrate specificities of the WT and engineered INS domains is consistent with the evolution of two distinct editing domains that function to clear Ala-tRNA(Pro) and Cys-tRNA(Pro) in vivo.     

The bacterial YbaK protein is a Cys-tRNAPro and Cys-tRNA Cys deacylase

Bacterial prolyl-tRNA synthetases and some smaller paralogs, YbaK and ProX, can hydrolyze misacylated Cys-tRNA Pro or Ala-tRNA Pro. To assess the significance of this quality control editing reaction in vivo, we tested Escherichia coli ybaK for its ability to suppress the E. coli thymidylate synthase thyA:146CCA missense mutant strain, which requires Cys-tRNA(Pro) for growth in the absence of thymine. Missense suppression was observed in a ybaK deletion background, suggesting that YbaK functions as a Cys-tRNA Pro deacylase in vivo. In vitro studies with the full set of 20 E. coli aminoacyl-tRNAs revealed that the Haemophilus influenzae and E. coli YbaK proteins are moderately general aminoacyl-tRNA deacylases that preferentially hydrolyze Cys-tRNA Pro and Cys-tRNA Cys and are also weak deacylases that cleave Gly-tRNA, Ala-tRNA, Ser-tRNA, Pro-tRNA, and Met-tRNA. The ProX protein acted as an aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase that cleaves preferentially Ala-tRNA and Gly-tRNA. The potential of H. influenzae YbaK to hydrolyze in vivo correctly charged Cys-tRNA Cys was tested in E. coli strain X2913 (ybaK+). Overexpression of H. influenzae ybaK decreased the in vivo ratio of Cys-tRNA Cys to tRNA Cys from 65 to 35% and reduced the growth rate of strain X2913 by 30% in LB medium. These data suggest that YbaK-mediated hydrolysis of aminoacyl-tRNA can influence cell growth.     

Role of coupled dynamics in the catalytic activity of prokaryotic-like prolyl-tRNA synthetases

Prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) have been shown to activate both cognate and some noncognate amino acids and attach them to specific tRNA(Pro) substrates. For example, alanine, which is smaller than cognate proline, is misactivated by Escherichia coli ProRS. Mischarged Ala-tRNA(Pro) is hydrolyzed by an editing domain (INS) that is distinct from the activation domain. It was previously shown that deletion of the INS greatly reduced cognate proline activation efficiency. In this study, experimental and computational approaches were used to test the hypothesis that deletion of the INS alters the internal protein dynamics leading to reduced catalytic function. Kinetic studies with two ProRS variants, G217A and E218A, revealed decreased amino acid activation efficiency. Molecular dynamics studies showed motional coupling between the INS and protein segments containing the catalytically important proline-binding loop (PBL, residues 199-206). In particular, the complete deletion of INS, as well as mutation of G217 or E218 to alanine, exhibited significant effects on the motion of the PBL. The presence of coupled dynamics between neighboring protein segments was also observed through in silico mutations and essential dynamics analysis. Altogether, this study demonstrates that structural elements at the editing domain-activation domain interface participate in coupled motions that facilitate amino acid binding and catalysis by bacterial ProRSs, which may explain why truncated or defunct editing domains have been maintained in some systems, despite the lack of catalytic activity.     

Functional role of the prokaryotic proline-tRNA synthetase insertion domain in amino acid editing

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of specific amino acids to cognate tRNAs in a two-step process that is critical for the faithful translation of genetic information. During the first chemical step of tRNA aminoacylation, noncognate amino acids that are smaller than or isosteric with the cognate substrate can be misactivated. Thus, to maintain high accuracy during protein translation, some synthetases have evolved an editing mechanism. Previously, we showed that class II Escherichia coli proline-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) is capable of (1) weakly misactivating Ala, (2) hydrolyzing the misactivated Ala-AMP in a reaction known as pretransfer editing, and (3) deacylating a mischarged Ala-tRNA(Pro) variant via a post-transfer editing pathway. In contrast to most systems where an editing function has been established, pretransfer editing by E. coli ProRS occurs in a tRNA-independent fashion. However, neither the pre- nor the post-transfer editing active site(s) has been identified. Sequence analyses revealed that most prokaryotic ProRSs possess a large insertion domain (INS) between class II conserved motifs 2 and 3. The function of the approximately 180-amino acid INS in E. coli ProRS is the subject of this investigation. Alignment-guided Ala scanning mutagenesis was carried out to test conserved amino acid residues present in the INS for their role in pre- and post-transfer editing. Our biochemical data and modeling studies suggest that the prokaryotic INS plays a critical role in editing and that this activity resides in a domain that is functionally and structurally distinct from the aminoacylation active site.     

Transfer RNA modulates the editing mechanism used by class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. To prevent errors in protein synthesis, many synthetases have evolved editing pathways by which misactivated amino acids (pre-transfer editing) and misacylated tRNAs (post-transfer editing) are hydrolyzed. Previous studies have shown that class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) possesses both pre- and post-transfer editing functions against noncognate alanine. To assess the relative contributions of pre- and post-transfer editing, presented herein are kinetic studies of an Escherichia coli ProRS mutant in which post-transfer editing is selectively inactivated, effectively isolating the pre-transfer editing pathway. When post-transfer editing is abolished, substantial levels of alanine mischarging are observed under saturating amino acid conditions, indicating that pre-transfer editing alone cannot prevent the formation of Ala-tRNA Pro. Steady-state kinetic parameters for aminoacylation measured under these conditions reveal that the preference for proline over alanine is 2000-fold, which is well within the regime where editing is required. Simultaneous measurement of AMP and Ala-tRNA Pro formation in the presence of tRNA Pro suggested that misactivated alanine is efficiently transferred to tRNA to form the mischarged product. In the absence of tRNA, enzyme-catalyzed Ala-AMP hydrolysis is the dominant form of editing, with "selective release" of noncognate adenylate from the active site constituting a minor pathway. Studies with human and Methanococcus jannaschii ProRS, which lack a post-transfer editing domain, suggest that enzymatic pre-transfer editing occurs within the aminoacylation active site. Taken together, the results reported herein illustrate how both pre- and post-transfer editing pathways work in concert to ensure accurate aminoacylation by ProRS.     

An isolated class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase insertion domain is functional in amino acid editing

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are responsible for activating specific amino acids and transferring them onto cognate tRNA molecules. Due to the similarity in many amino acid side chains, certain synthetases misactivate non-cognate amino acids to an extent that would be detrimental to protein synthesis if left uncorrected. To ensure accurate translation of the genetic code, some synthetases therefore utilize editing mechanisms to hydrolyze non-cognate products. Previously class II Escherichia coli proline-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) was shown to exhibit pre- and post-transfer editing activity, hydrolyzing a misactivated alanine-adenylate (Ala-AMP) and a mischarged Ala-tRNAPro variant, respectively. Residues critical for the editing activity (Asp-350 and Lys-279) are found in a novel insertion domain (INS) positioned between motifs 2 and 3 of the class defining aminoacylation active site. In this work, we present further evidence that INS is responsible for editing in ProRS. We deleted the INS from wild-type E. coli ProRS to yield DeltaINS-ProRS. While DeltaINS-ProRS was still capable of misactivating alanine, the truncated construct was defective in hydrolyzing non-cognate Ala-AMP. When the INS domain was cloned and expressed as an independent protein, it was capable of deacylating a mischarged Ala-microhelixPro variant. Similar to full-length ProRS, post-transfer editing was abolished in a K279A mutant INS. We also show that YbaK, a protein of unknown function from Haemophilus influenzae with high sequence homology to the prokaryotic INS domain, was capable of deacylating Ala-tRNAPro and Ala-microhelixPro variants but not cognate Pro-tRNAPro. Thus, we demonstrate for the first time that an independently folded class II synthetase editing domain and a previously identified homolog can catalyze a hydrolytic editing reaction.     

Asymmetric behavior of archaeal prolyl-tRNA synthetase

Archaeal prolyl-tRNA synthetases differ from their bacterial counterparts: they contain an additional domain (about 70 amino acids) appended to the carboxy-terminus and lack an editing domain inserted into the class II catalytic core. Biochemical and structural approaches have generated a wealth of information on amino acid and tRNA specificities for both types of ProRSs, but have left a number of aspects unexplored. We report here that the carboxy-terminal domain of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii ProRS is not involved in tRNA binding since its deletion only mildly affects the kinetic parameters for the enzyme. We also demonstrate that M. jannaschii ProRS is a homodimeric enzyme that is functionally asymmetric; only one of the two active sites at a time is able to form prolyl-adenylate, and only one tRNA molecule binds per dimer. Together with previous reports our results show that asymmetry might be a general feature of the aminoacylation reaction catalyzed by dimeric aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases from both classes.     

Crystal structure of YbaK protein from Haemophilus influenzae (HI1434) at 1.8 A resolution: functional implications

Structural genomics of proteins of unknown function most straightforwardly assists with assignment of biochemical activity when the new structure resembles that of proteins whose functions are known. When a new fold is revealed, the universe of known folds is enriched, and once the function is determined by other means, novel structure-function relationships are established. The previously unannotated protein HI1434 from H. influenzae provides a hybrid example of these two paradigms. It is a member of a microbial protein family, labeled in SwissProt as YbaK and ebsC. The crystal structure at 1.8 A resolution reported here reveals a fold that is only remotely related to the C-lectin fold, in particular to endostatin, and thus is not sufficiently similar to imply that YbaK proteins are saccharide binding proteins. However, a crevice that may accommodate a small ligand is evident. The putative binding site contains only one invariant residue, Lys46, which carries a functional group that could play a role in catalysis, indicating that YbaK is probably not an enzyme. Detailed sequence analysis, including a number of newly sequenced microbial organisms, highlights sequence homology to an insertion domain in prolyl-tRNA synthetases (proRS) from prokaryote, a domain whose function is unknown. A HI1434-based model of the insertion domain shows that it should also contain the putative binding site. Being part of a tRNA synthetases, the insertion domain is likely to be involved in oligonucleotide binding, with possible roles in recognition/discrimination or editing of prolyl-tRNA. By analogy, YbaK may also play a role in nucleotide or oligonucleotide binding, the nature of which is yet to be determined.     

Functional guanine-arginine interaction between tRNAPro and prolyl-tRNA synthetase that couples binding and catalysis

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of specific amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. Specific aminoacylation is dictated by a set of recognition elements that mark tRNA molecules as substrates for particular synthetases. Escherichia coli prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) has previously been shown to recognize specific bases of tRNA(Pro) in both the anticodon domain, which mediate initial complex formation, and in the acceptor stem, which is proximal to the site of catalysis. In this work, we unambiguously define the molecular interaction between E. coli ProRS and the acceptor stem of cognate tRNA(Pro). Oxidative cross-linking studies using 2'-deoxy-8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanosine-containing proline tRNAs identify a direct interaction between a critical arginine residue (R144) in the active site of E. coli ProRS and the G72 residue in the acceptor stem of tRNA(Pro). Assays conducted with motif 2 loop variants and tRNA mutants wherein specific atomic groups of G72 were deleted, are consistent with a functionally important hydrogen-bonding network between R144 and the major groove of G72. These results taken together with previous studies suggest that breaking this key contact uncouples the allosteric interaction between the anticodon domain and the aminoacylation active site, providing new insights into the communication network that governs the synthetase-tRNA interaction.     

Substrate-mediated Fidelity Mechanism Ensures Accurate Decoding of Proline Codons

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases attach specific amino acids to cognate tRNAs. Prolyl-tRNA synthetases are known to mischarge tRNA^Pro with the smaller amino acid alanine and with cysteine, which is the same size as proline. Quality control in proline codon translation is partly ensured by an editing domain (INS) present in most bacterial prolyl-tRNA synthetases that hydrolyzes smaller Ala-tRNA^Pro and excludes Pro-tRNA^Pro. In contrast, Cys-tRNA^Pro is cleared by a freestanding INS domain homolog, YbaK. Here, we have investigated the molecular mechanism of catalysis and substrate recognition by Hemophilus influenzae YbaK using site-directed mutagenesis, enzymatic assays of isosteric substrates and functional group analogs, and computational modeling. These studies together with mass spectrometric characterization of the YbaK-catalyzed reaction products support a novel substrate-assisted mechanism of Cys-tRNA^Pro deacylation that prevents nonspecific Pro-tRNA^Pro hydrolysis. Collectively, we propose that the INS and YbaK domains co-evolved distinct mechanisms involving steric exclusion and thiol-specific chemistry, respectively, to ensure accurate decoding of proline codons.     

Divergent adaptation of tRNA recognition by Methanococcus jannaschii prolyl-tRNA synthetase

Analysis of prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) across all three taxonomic domains (Eubacteria, Eucarya, and Archaea) reveals that the sequences are divided into two distinct groups. Recent studies show that Escherichia coli ProRS, a member of the "prokaryotic-like" group, recognizes specific tRNA bases at both the acceptor and anticodon ends, whereas human ProRS, a member of the "eukaryotic-like" group, recognizes nucleotide bases primarily in the anticodon. The archaeal Methanococcus jannaschii ProRS is a member of the eukaryotic-like group, although its tRNA(Pro) possesses prokaryotic features in the acceptor stem. We show here that, in some respects, recognition of tRNA(Pro) by M. jannaschii ProRS parallels that of human, with a strong emphasis on the anticodon and only weak recognition of the acceptor stem. However, our data also indicate differences in the details of the anticodon recognition between these two eukaryotic-like synthetases. Although the human enzyme places a stronger emphasis on G35, the M. jannaschii enzyme places a stronger emphasis on G36, a feature that is shared by E. coli ProRS. These results, interpreted in the context of an extensive sequence alignment, provide evidence of divergent adaptation by M. jannaschii ProRS; recognition of the tRNA acceptor end is eukaryotic-like, whereas the details of the anticodon recognition are prokaryotic-like. This divergence may be a reflection of the unusual dual function of this enzyme, which catalyzes specific aminoacylation with proline as well as with cysteine.     

Evolutionary coadaptation of the motif 2--acceptor stem interaction in the class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase system

Known crystal structures of class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases complexed to their cognate tRNAs reveal that critical acceptor stem contacts are made by the variable loop connecting the beta-strands of motif 2 located within the catalytic core of class II synthetases. To identify potential acceptor stem contacts made by Escherichia coli prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS), an enzyme of unknown structure, we performed cysteine-scanning mutagenesis in the motif 2 loop. We identified an arginine residue (R144) that was essential for tRNA aminoacylation but played no role in amino acid activation. Cross-linking experiments confirmed that the end of the tRNA(Pro) acceptor stem is proximal to this motif 2 loop residue. Previous work had shown that the tRNA(Pro) acceptor stem elements A73 and G72 (both strictly conserved among bacteria) are important recognition elements for E. coli ProRS. We carried out atomic group "mutagenesis" studies at these two positions of E. coli tRNA(Pro) and determined that major groove functional groups at A73 and G72 are critical for recognition by ProRS. Human tRNA(Pro), which lacks these elements, is not aminoacylated by the bacterial enzyme. An analysis of chimeric tRNA(Pro) constructs showed that, in addition to A73 and G72, transplantation of the E. coli tRNA(Pro) D-domain was necessary and sufficient to convert the human tRNA into a substrate for the bacterial synthetase. In contrast to the bacterial system, base-specific acceptor stem recognition does not appear to be used by human ProRS. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis revealed that motif 2 loop residues are not critical for tRNA aminoacylation activity of the human enzyme. Taken together, our results illustrate how synthetases and tRNAs have coadapted to changes in protein-acceptor stem recognition through evolution.     

Structural and functional mapping of the archaeal multi-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex

Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus contains a multi-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex (MSC) of LysRS, LeuRS and ProRS. Elongation factor (EF) 1A also associates to the MSC, with LeuRS possibly acting as a core protein. Analysis of the MSC revealed that LysRS and ProRS specifically interact with the idiosyncratic N- and C- termini of LeuRS, respectively. EF-1A instead interacts with the inserted CP1 proofreading domain, consistent with models for post-transfer editing by class I synthetases such as LeuRS. Together with previous genetic data, these findings show that LeuRS plays a central role in mediating interactions within the archaeal MSC by acting as a core scaffolding protein.     

Functional association between three archaeal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are responsible for attaching amino acids to their cognate tRNAs during protein synthesis. In eukaryotes aaRSs are commonly found in multi-enzyme complexes, although the role of these complexes is still not completely clear. Associations between aaRSs have also been reported in archaea, including a complex between prolyl-(ProRS) and leucyl-tRNA synthetases (LeuRS) in Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus that enhances tRNA(Pro) aminoacylation. Yeast two-hybrid screens suggested that lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS) also associates with LeuRS in M. thermautotrophicus. Co-purification experiments confirmed that LeuRS, LysRS, and ProRS associate in cell-free extracts. LeuRS bound LysRS and ProRS with a comparable K(D) of about 0.3-0.9 microm, further supporting the formation of a stable multi-synthetase complex. The steady-state kinetics of aminoacylation by LysRS indicated that LeuRS specifically reduced the Km for tRNA(Lys) over 3-fold, with no additional change seen upon the addition of ProRS. No significant changes in aminoacylation by LeuRS or ProRS were observed upon the addition of LysRS. These findings, together with earlier data, indicate the existence of a functional complex of three aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in archaea in which LeuRS improves the catalytic efficiency of tRNA aminoacylation by both LysRS and ProRS.     

Association between Archaeal prolyl- and leucyl-tRNA synthetases enhances tRNA(Pro) aminoacylation

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-containing complexes have been identified in different eukaryotes, and their existence has also been suggested in some Archaea. To investigate interactions involving aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in Archaea, we undertook a yeast two-hybrid screen for interactions between Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus proteins using prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) as the bait. Interacting proteins identified included components of methanogenesis, protein-modifying factors, and leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS). The association of ProRS with LeuRS was confirmed in vitro by native gel electrophoresis and size exclusion chromatography. Determination of the steady-state kinetics of tRNA(Pro) charging showed that the catalytic efficiency (k(cat)/K(m)) of ProRS increased 5-fold in the complex with LeuRS compared with the free enzyme, whereas the K(m) for proline was unchanged. No significant changes in the steady-state kinetics of LeuRS aminoacylation were observed upon the addition of ProRS. These findings indicate that ProRS and LeuRS associate in M. thermautotrophicus and suggest that this interaction contributes to translational fidelity by enhancing tRNA aminoacylation by ProRS.