Molecular interactions of ASPP1 and ASPP2 with the p53 protein family and the apoptotic promoters PUMA and Bax

The apoptosis stimulating p53 proteins, ASPP1 and ASPP2, are the first two common activators of the p53 protein family that selectively enable the latter to regulate specific apoptotic target genes, which facilitates yes yet unknown mechanisms for discrimination between cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. To better understand the interplay between ASPP- and p53-family of proteins we investigated the molecular interactions between them using biochemical methods and structure-based homology modelling. The data demonstrate that: (i) the binding of ASPP1 and ASPP2 to p53, p63 and p73 is direct; (ii) the C-termini of ASPP1 and ASPP2 interact with the DNA-binding domains of p53 protein family with dissociation constants, K_d, in the lower micro-molar range; (iii) the stoichiometry of binding is 1:1; (iv) the DNA-binding domains of p53 family members are sufficient for these protein–protein interactions; (v) EMSA titrations revealed that while tri-complex formation between ASPPs, p53 family of proteins and PUMA/Bax is mutually exclusive, ASPP2 (but not ASPP1) formed a complex with PUMA (but not Bax) and displaced p53 and p73. The structure-based homology modelling revealed subtle differences between ASPP2 and ASPP1 and together with the experimental data provide novel mechanistic insights.     

Transactivation-deficient Delta TA-p73 inhibits p53 by direct competition for DNA binding: implications for tumorigenesis

The p53 family member p73 displays significant structural and functional homology to p53. However, instead of mutational inactivation, overexpression of wild-type p73 has been reported in various tumor types compared with normal tissues, arguing against a classical tumor suppressor function. Recently, N-terminally truncated, transactivation-deficient p73 isoforms (DeltaTA-p73) have been identified as a second class of p73 proteins. Because overexpression of p73 in tumors includes DeltaTA-p73, we further characterized these novel p73 isoforms. We show that DeltaTA-p73 retains DNA-binding competence but lacks transactivation functions, resulting in an inability to induce growth arrest and apoptosis. Importantly, DeltaTA-p73 acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor of p53 and full-length p73 (TA-p73). We demonstrate that inhibition of p53 involves competition for DNA binding, whereas TA-p73 can be inhibited by direct protein-protein interaction. Further, we show that up-regulation of endogenous p73 just like ectopic overexpression of DeltaTA-p73 confers resistance to p53-mediated apoptosis induced by the chemotherapeutic agent H-7. Because inhibition of p53 is a common theme in human cancer, our data strongly support a role of DeltaTA-p73 expression for tumor formation.     

Life or death

The tumor suppressor p53 provides exquisite protection from cancer by balancing cell survival and death in response to stress. Sustained stress or irreparable damage trigger p53's killer functions to permanently eliminate genetically-altered cells as a potential source of cancer. To prevent the unnecessary loss of cells that could cause premature aging as a result of stem cell attrition, the killer functions of p53 are tightly regulated and balanced against protector functions that promote damage repair and support survival in response to low stress or mild damage. In molecular terms these p53-based cell fate decisions involve protein interactions with cofactors and modifying enzymes, which modulate the activation of distinct sets of p53 target genes. In addition, we demonstrate that part of this regulation occurs at the level of DNA binding. We show that the killer function of p53 requires the four DNA binding domains within the p53 tetramer to interact with one another. These intermolecular interactions enable cooperative binding of p53 to less perfect response elements in the genome, which are present in many target genes essential for apoptosis. Modulating p53 interactions within the tetramer could therefore present a novel promising strategy to fine-tune p53-based cell fate decisions.     

p63 and p73: roles in development and tumor formation

The tumor suppressor p53 is critically important in the cellular damage response and is the founding member of a family of proteins. All three genes regulate cell cycle and apoptosis after DNA damage. However, despite a remarkable structural and partly functional similarity among p53, p63, and p73, mouse knockout studies revealed an unexpected functional diversity among them. p63 and p73 knockouts exhibit severe developmental abnormalities but no increased cancer susceptibility, whereas this picture is reversed for p53 knockouts. Neither p63 nor p73 is the target of inactivating mutations in human cancers. Genomic organization is more complex in p63 and p73, largely the result of an alternative internal promoter generating NH2-terminally deleted dominant-negative proteins that engage in inhibitory circuits within the family. Deregulated dominant-negative p73 isoforms might play an active oncogenic role in some human cancers. Moreover, COOH-terminal extensions specific for p63 and p73 enable further unique protein-protein interactions with regulatory pathways involved in development, differentiation, proliferation, and damage response. Thus, p53 family proteins take on functions within a wide biological spectrum stretching from development (p63 and p73), DNA damage response via apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (p53, TAp63, and TAp73), chemosensitivity of tumors (p53 and TAp73), and immortalization and oncogenesis (DeltaNp73).     

p53 and p73 display common and distinct requirements for sequence specific binding to DNA

Although p53 and p73 share considerable homology in their DNA-binding domains, there have been few studies examining their relative interactions with DNA as purified proteins. Comparing p53 and p73β proteins, our data show that zinc chelation by EDTA is significantly more detrimental to the ability of p73β than of p53 to bind DNA, most likely due to the greater effect that the loss of zinc has on the conformation of the DNA-binding domain of p73. Furthermore, prebinding to DNA strongly protects p73β but not p53 from chelation by EDTA suggesting that DNA renders the core domain of p73 less accessible to its environment. Further exploring these biochemical differences, a five-base sub-sequence was identified in the p53 consensus binding site that confers a greater DNA-binding stability on p73β than on full-length p53 in vitro. Surprisingly, p53 lacking its C-terminal non-specific DNA-binding domain (p53Δ30) demonstrates the same sequence discrimination as does p73β. In vivo, both p53 and p73β exhibit higher transactivation of a reporter with a binding site containing this sub-sequence, suggesting that lower in vitro dissociation translates to higher in vivo transactivation of sub-sequence-containing sites.     

Gain of Cellular Adaptation Due to Prolonged p53 Impairment Leads to Functional Switchover from p53 to p73 during DNA Damage in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells

Tumor suppressor p53 plays the central role in regulating apoptosis in response to genotoxic stress. From an evolutionary perspective, the activity of p53 has to be backed up by other protein(s) in case of any functional impairment of this protein, to trigger DNA damage-induced apoptosis in cancer cells. We adopted multiple experimental approaches to demonstrate that in p53-impaired cancer cells, DNA damage caused accumulation of p53 paralogue p73 via Chk-1 that strongly impacted Bax expression and p53-independent apoptosis. On the contrary, when p53 function was restored by ectopic expression, Chk-2 induced p53 accumulation that in turn overshadowed p73 activity, suggesting an antagonistic interaction between p53 family members. To understand such interaction better, p53-expressing cells were impaired differentially for p53 activity. In wild-type p53-expressing cancer cells that were silenced for p53 for several generations, p73 was activated, whereas no such trend was observed when p53 was transiently silenced. Prolonged p53 interference, even in functional p53 settings, therefore, leads to the “gain of cellular adaptation” in a way that alters the cellular microenvironment in favor of p73 activation by altering p73-regulatory proteins, e.g. Chk1 activation and dominant negative p73 down-regulation. These findings not only unveil a hitherto unexplained mechanism underlying the functional switchover from p53 to p73, but also validate p73 as a promising and potential target for cancer therapy in the absence of functional p53.     

Transactivation specificity is conserved among p53 family proteins and depends on a response element sequence code

Structural and biochemical studies have demonstrated that p73, p63 and p53 recognize DNA with identical amino acids and similar binding affinity. Here, measuring transactivation activity for a large number of response elements (REs) in yeast and human cell lines, we show that p53 family proteins also have overlapping transactivation profiles. We identified mutations at conserved amino acids of loops L1 and L3 in the DNA-binding domain that tune the transactivation potential nearly equally in p73, p63 and p53. For example, the mutant S139F in p73 has higher transactivation potential towards selected REs, enhanced DNA-binding cooperativity in vitro and a flexible loop L1 as seen in the crystal structure of the protein–DNA complex. By studying, how variations in the RE sequence affect transactivation specificity, we discovered a RE-transactivation code that predicts enhanced transactivation; this correlation is stronger for promoters of genes associated with apoptosis.     

Mechanism of DNA-binding loss upon single-point mutation in p53

Over 50% of all human cancers involve p53 mutations, which occur mostly in the sequence-specific DNA-binding central domain (p53c), yielding little/non-detectable affinity to the DNA consensus site. Despite our current understanding of protein-DNA recognition, the mechanism(s) underlying the loss in protein-DNA binding affinity/specificity upon single-point mutation are not well understood. Our goal is to identify the common factors governing the DNA-binding loss of p53c upon substitution of Arg 273 to His or Cys, which are abundant in human tumours. By computing the free energies of wild-type and mutant p53c binding to DNA and decomposing them into contributions from individual residues, the DNA-binding loss upon charge/noncharge-conserving mutation of Arg 273 was attributed not only to the loss of DNA phosphate contacts, but also to longer-range structural changes caused by the loss of the Asp 281 salt-bridge. The results herein and in previous works suggest that Asp 281 plays a critical role in the sequence-specific DNA-binding function of p53c by (i) orienting Arg 273 and Arg 280 in an optimal position to interact with the phosphate and base groups of the consensus DNA, respectively, and (ii) helping to maintain the proper DNA-binding protein conformation.     

Mechanism of DNA-binding loss upon single-point mutation in p53

Over 50% of all human cancers involve p53 mutations,which occur mostly in the sequence-specific DNA-binding central domain (p53c), yielding little/non-detectable af?nity to the DNA consensus site. Despite our current understanding of protein-DNA recognition,the mechanism(s) underlying the loss in protein-DNA binding afnity/ specificity upon single-point mutation are not well understood. Our goal is to identify the common factors governing the DNA-binding loss of p53c upon substitution of Arg 273 to His or Cys,which are abundant in human tumours. By computing the free energies of wild-type and mutant p53c binding to DNA and decomposing them into contributions from individual residues, the DNA-binding loss upon charge/noncharge -conserving mutation of Arg 273 was attributed not only to the loss of DNA phosphate contacts, but also to longer-range structural changes caused by the loss of the Asp 281 salt-bridge. The results herein and in previous works suggest that Asp 281 plays a critical role in the sequence-specific DNA-binding function of p53c by (i)orienting Arg 273 and Arg 280 in an optimal position to interact with the phosphate and base groups of the consensus DNA, respectively, and (ii) helping to maintain the proper DNA-binding protein conformation.