OX40/OX40L costimulation affects induction of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in part by expanding memory T cells in vivo

OX40 is a member of the TNFR superfamily and has potent T cell costimulatory activities. OX40 also inhibits the induction of Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) from T effector cells, but the precise mechanism of such inhibition remains unknown. In the present study, we found that CD4(+) T effector cells from OX40 ligand-transgenic (OX40Ltg) mice are highly resistant to TGF-beta mediated induction of Foxp3(+) Tregs, whereas wild-type B6 and OX40 knockout CD4(+) T effector cells can be readily converted to Foxp3(+) T cells. We also found that CD4(+) T effector cells from OX40Ltg mice are heterogeneous and contain a large population of CD44(high)CD62L(-) memory T cells. Analysis of purified OX40Ltg naive and memory CD4(+) T effector cells showed that memory CD4(+) T cells not only resist the induction of Foxp3(+) T cells but also actively suppress the conversion of naive CD4(+) T effector cells to Foxp3(+) Tregs. This suppression is mediated by the production of IFN-gamma by memory T cells but not by cell-cell contact and also involves the induction of T-bet. Importantly, memory CD4(+) T cells have a broad impact on the induction of Foxp3(+) Tregs regardless of their origins and Ag specificities. Our data suggest that one of the mechanisms by which OX40 inhibits the induction of Foxp3(+) Tregs is by inducing memory T cells in vivo. This finding may have important clinical implications in tolerance induction to transplanted tissues.     

Generation of anergic and regulatory T cells following prolonged exposure to a harmless antigen

Regulatory CD4(+) T cells are known to develop during the induction of donor-specific peripheral tolerance to transplanted tissues; it is proposed that such tolerance is a consequence of persistent, danger-free stimulation by Ag. To test this hypothesis, male RAG-1(-/-) mice were recolonized with small numbers of monospecific CD4(+) T cells specific for the male H-2E(k)-restricted Ag Dby. After 6 wk in the male environment, the monospecific CD4(+) T cells, having recolonized the host, had become anergic to stimulation in vitro and had acquired a regulatory capacity. CD4(+) T cells in these mice expressed higher levels of CTLA-4 and glucocorticoid-induced TNF-related receptor than naive CD4(+) T cells, but only 3% of the recolonizing cells were CD25(+) and did not express significant foxP3 mRNA. In vivo, these tolerant T cells could censor accumulation of, and IFN-gamma production by, naive T cells, with only a slight inhibition of proliferation. This suppressive effect was not reversed by the addition of fresh bone marrow-derived male dendritic cells. These results suggest that persistent exposure to Ag in conditions that fail to evoke proinflammatory stimuli leads to the development of T cells that are both anergic and regulatory.     

Anergic CD8+ T cells can persist and function in vivo.

Using a mouse model system, we demonstrate that anergic CD8+ T cells can persist and retain some functional capabilities in vivo, even after the induction of tolerance. In TCR Vbeta5 transgenic mice, mature CD8+Vbeta5+ T cells transit through a CD8lowVbeta5low deletional intermediate during tolerance induction. CD8low cells are characterized by an activated phenotype, are functionally compromised in vitro, and are slated for deletion in vivo. We now demonstrate that CD8low cells derive from a proliferative compartment, but do not divide in vivo. CD8low cells persist in vivo with a t1/2 of 3-5 days, in contrast to their in vitro t1/2 of 0.5-1 day. During this unexpectedly long in vivo life span, CD8low cells are capable of producing IFN-gamma in vivo despite their inability to proliferate or to kill target cells in vitro. CD8low cells also accumulate at sites of inflammation, where they produce IFN-gamma. Therefore, rather than withdrawing from the pool of functional CD8+ T cells, anergic CD8low cells retain a potential regulatory role despite losing their capacity to proliferate. The ability of anergic cells to persist and function in vivo adds another level of complexity to the process of tolerance induction in the lymphoid periphery.     

CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells selectively diminish systemic autoreactivity in arthritic K/BxN mice

Although the arthritis symptoms observed in the K/BxN model have been shown to be dependent on the functions of T and B cells specific to the self antigen glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, less is known about the in vivo roles of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T (T(reg)) cells in the pathology of K/BxN mice. We determined the quantitative and functional characteristics of the T(reg) cells in K/BxN mice. These mice contained a higher percentage of Foxp3(+) T(reg) cells among the CD4(+) T cells than their BxN littermates. These T(reg) cells were anergic and efficiently suppressed the proliferation of na?ve CD4(+) T cells and cytokine production by effector CD4(+) T cells in vitro. Antibody-mediated depletion of CD25(+) cells caused K/BxN mice to develop multi-organ inflammation and autoantibody production, while the symptoms of arthritis were not affected. These results demonstrate that despite the inability of the T(reg) cells to suppress arthritis development, they play a critical role protecting the arthritic mice from systemic expansion of autoimmunity.     

CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- T cells act respectively as inducer and effector T suppressor cells in superantigen-induced tolerance

The repeated injection of low doses of bacterial superantigens (SAg) is known to induce specific T cell unresponsiveness. We show in this study that the spleen of BALB/c mice receiving chronically, staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) contains SEB-specific CD4(+) TCRBV8(+) T cells exerting an immune regulatory function on SEB-specific primary T cell responses. Suppression affects IL-2 and IFN-gamma secretion as well as proliferation of T cells. However, the suppressor cells differ from the natural CD4(+) T regulatory cells, described recently in human and mouse, because they do not express cell surface CD25. They are CD152 (CTLA-4)-negative and their regulatory activity is not associated with expression of the NF Foxp3. By contrast, after repeated SEB injection, CD4(+)CD25(+) splenocytes were heterogenous and contained both effector as well as regulatory cells. In vivo, CD4(+)CD25(-) T regulatory cells prevented SEB-induced death independently of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells. Nevertheless, SEB-induced tolerance could not be achieved in thymectomized CD25(+) cell-depleted mice because repeated injection of SEB did not avert lethal toxic shock in these animals. Collectively, these data demonstrate that, whereas CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory cells are required for the induction of SAg-induced tolerance, CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells exert their regulatory activity at the maintenance stage of SAg-specific unresponsiveness.     

Generation of anergic and potentially immunoregulatory CD25+CD4 T cells in vivo after induction of peripheral tolerance with intravenous or oral antigen.

Immunoregulatory CD25(+)CD4 T cells are thought to arise from the thymus as a distinct lineage of CD4 T cells specific for self Ags. We used the DO11.10 TCR transgenic adoptive transfer system to show that cells of similar phenotype may also arise in the course of peripheral tolerance induction. Such cells emerged within 1 wk following Ag exposure and correlated negatively with the number of initial cell divisions. Limiting i.v. Ag dose or using an oral tolerance protocol yielded the greatest numbers of Ag-specific CD25(+)CD4 T cells. In contrast, immunogenic Ag exposure in the presence of an adjuvant did not lead to emergence of CD25(+)CD4 T cells. The profound anergic phenotype of these cells and their potential immunoregulatory properties make them an especially desirable population to induce in the course of immunotherapy in numerous clinical settings. This experimental system may be useful in future studies designed to optimize immunologic tolerance induction.     

Anergy in memory CD4+ T cells is induced by B cells

Induction of tolerance in memory T cells has profound implications in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and transplant rejection. Previously, we reported that the presentation of low densities of agonist peptide/MHC class II complexes induced anergy in memory CD4(+) T cells. In the present study, we address the specific interaction of different types of APCs with memory CD4(+) T cells. A novel ex vivo anergy assay first suggested that B cells induce anergy in memory T cells, and an in vivo cell transfer assay further confirmed those observations. We demonstrated that B cells pulsed with defined doses of Ag anergize memory CD4 cells in vivo. We established that CD11c(+) dendritic cells do not contribute to anergy induction to CD4 memory T cells, because diphtheria toxin receptor-transgenic mice that were conditionally depleted of dendritic cells optimally induced anergy in memory CD4(+) T cells. Moreover, B cell-deficient muMT mice did not induce anergy in memory T cells. We showed that B2 follicular B cells are the specific subpopulation of B cells that render memory T cells anergic. Furthermore, we present data showing that anergy in this system is mediated by CTLA-4 up-regulation on T cells. This is the first study to demonstrate formally that B cells are the APCs that induce anergy in memory CD4(+) T cells.     

Comprehensive analysis of CD4+ T cells in the decision between tolerance and immunity in vivo reveals a pivotal role for ICOS

We have established a comprehensive in vivo mouse model for the CD4(+) T cell response to an "innocuous" versus "dangerous" exogenous Ag and developed an in vivo test for tolerance. In this model, specific gene-expression signatures, distinctive upregulation of early T cell-communication molecules, and differential expansion of effector T cells (Teff) and regulatory T cells (Treg) were identified as central correlates of T cell tolerance and T cell immunity. Different from essentially all other T cell-activation molecules, ICOS was found to be induced in the immunity response and not by T cells activated under tolerogenic conditions. If expressed, ICOS did not act as a general T cell costimulator but selectively caused a massive expansion of effector CD4(+) T cells, leaving the regulatory CD4(+) T cell compartment largely undisturbed. Thus, ICOS strongly contributed to the dramatic change in the balance between Ag-specific Teff and Treg from ～1:1 at steady state to 21:1 at the height of the immune response. This newly defined role for the balance of Teff to Treg, together with its known key function in T cell help for B cells, establishes ICOS as a central mediator of immunity. Given its exceptionally selective induction on CD4(+) T cells under inflammatory, but not tolerogenic, conditions, ICOS emerges as a pivotal effector molecule in the early decision between tolerance and immunity to exogenous Ag.     

Location and time-dependent control of rejection by regulatory T cells culminates in a failure to generate memory T cells

Adaptive CD25(+)CD4(+) regulatory T cells (Treg) can be induced following exposure to alloantigen and may function alongside naturally occurring Treg to suppress allograft rejection when present in sufficient numbers. However, the location of the Treg as they function in vivo and the mechanisms used to control donor-reactive T cells remains ill-defined. In this study, we used a CD8(+) TCR transgenic model of skin allograft rejection to characterize in vivo activity of donor-reactive Treg cells during induction of transplantation tolerance. We demonstrate that, initially after skin transplantation, Treg attenuate the priming of donor-reactive naive CD8(+) T cells in the lymphoid tissue draining the graft site. However, with time, peripheral suppression is overcome despite the continued presence of Treg, resulting in the priming of donor-reactive CD8(+) T cells and graft infiltration by the resultant effector T cells and induction of a "Tc1-like" intragraft gene expression profile. These intragraft effector CD8(+) T cells are then prevented from eliciting rejection by Treg that simultaneously infiltrate the skin allografts, resulting in a failure to generate donor-reactive memory CD8(+) T cells. Overall, these data demonstrate for the first time that donor-reactive Treg can suppress allograft rejection using distinct mechanisms at different sites in vivo with the overall outcome of preventing the generation of donor-reactive memory T cells.     

Activation of CD25(+)CD4(+) regulatory T cells by oral antigen administration

CD25(+)CD4(+) T cells are naturally occurring regulatory T cells that are anergic and have suppressive properties. Although they can be isolated from the spleens of normal mice, there are limited studies on how they can be activated or expanded in vivo. We found that oral administration of OVA to OVA TCR transgenic mice resulted in a modification of the ratio of CD25(+)CD4(+) to CD25(-)CD4(+) cells with an increase of CD25(+)CD4(+) T cells accompanied by a decrease of CD25(-)CD4(+) T cells. The relative increase in CD25(+)CD4(+) T cells persisted for as long as 4 wk post feeding. We also found that CTLA-4 was dominantly expressed in CD25(+)CD4(+) T cells and there was an increase in the percentage of CD25(+)CD4(+) T cells expressing CTLA-4 in OVA-fed mice. In contrast to CD25(-)CD4(+) cells, CD25(+)CD4(+) cells from fed mice proliferated only minimally to OVA or anti-CD3 and secreted IL-10 and elevated levels of TGF-beta(1) following anti-CD3 stimulation. CD25(+)CD4(+) cells from fed mice suppressed the proliferation of CD25(-)CD4(+) T cells in vitro more potently than CD25(+)CD4(+) T cells isolated from unfed mice, and this suppression was partially reversible by IL-10 soluble receptor or TGF-beta soluble receptor and high concentration of anti-CTLA-4. With anti-CD3 stimulation, CD25(+)CD4(+) cells from unfed mice secreted IFN-gamma, whereas CD25(+)CD4(+) cells from fed mice did not. Adoptive transfer of CD25(+)CD4(+) T cells from fed mice suppressed in vivo delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in BALB/c mice. These results demonstrate an Ag-specific in vivo method to activate CD25(+)CD4(+) regulatory T cells and suggest that they may be involved in oral tolerance.     

The 4-1BB costimulation augments the proliferation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells

The thymus-derived CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells belong to a subset of regulatory T cells potentially capable of suppressing the proliferation of pathogenic effector T cells. Intriguingly, these suppressor cells are themselves anergic, proliferating poorly to mitogenic stimulation in culture. In this study, we find that the 4-1BB costimulator receptor, best known for promoting the proliferation and survival of CD8(+) T cells, also induces the proliferation of the CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells both in culture and in vivo. The proliferating CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells produce no detectable IL-2, suggesting that 4-1BB costimulation of these cells does not involve IL-2 production. The 4-1BB-expanded CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells are functional, as they remain suppressive to other T cells in coculture. These results support the notion that the peripheral expansion of the CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells is controlled in part by costimulation.     

The balance between donor T cell anergy and suppression versus lethal graft-versus-host disease is determined by host conditioning

Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) remains the most life-threatening complication following the transfer of allogeneic bone marrow into immunocompromised hosts. Transferred alloreactive T cells respond in a complex manner. While massive T cell expansion is observed upon entry into an allogeneic environment, anergy, apoptosis, and repertoire selection are also observed. The study presented here shows that alloreactive T cell expansion and differentiation vs anergy and suppression are dramatically influenced by host conditioning. Using alloreactive CD4(+) and CD8(+) TCR transgenic (Tg) T cells, a novel GVHD model is presented that allows for the visualization of how alloreactive T cells behave when host conditioning is manipulated. Following the transfer of alloreactive CD4(+) and CD8(+) TCR Tg T cells into sublethally irradiated hosts, both Tg T cells populations expand, develop effector function, and cause GVHD. In contrast, when Tg T cells are transferred in non-irradiated hosts, expansion is observed, but there is no development of effector function or disease. Assessment of CD4(+) Tg T cell function following transfer into non-irradiated hosts reveals that these CD4(+) Tg cells are profoundly anergic and have acquired a regulatory function, as manifested in their ability to suppress the expansion of naive TCR Tg T cells in vitro and in vivo as well as the development of GVHD. These findings underscore the decisive effect of the inflammatory environment created by irradiation in determining the ultimate fate and function of alloreactive T cells in vivo     

Arthritogenic self-reactive CD4+ T cells acquire an FR4hiCD73hi anergic state in the presence of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells

Rheumatoid arthritis develops in association with a defect in peripheral CD4(+) T cell homeostasis. T cell lymphopenia has also been shown to be a barrier to CD4(+) T cell clonal anergy induction. We therefore explored the relationship between clonal anergy induction and the avoidance of autoimmune arthritis by tracking the fate of glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI)-reactive CD4(+) T cells in the setting of selective T cell lymphopenia. CD4(+) T cell recognition of self-GPI peptide/MHC class II complexes in normal murine hosts did not lead to arthritis and instead caused those T cells to develop a Folate receptor 4(hi)CD73(hi) anergic phenotype. In contrast, hosts selectively depleted of polyclonal Foxp3(+)CD4(+) regulatory T cells could not make GPI-specific CD4(+) T cells anergic and failed to control arthritis. This suggests that autoimmune arthritis develops in the setting of lymphopenia when Foxp3(+)CD4(+) regulatory T cells are insufficient to functionally inactivate all autoreactive CD4(+) T cells that encounter self-Ag.     

T cells signaled by NF-kappa B- dendritic cells are sensitized not anergic to subsequent activation

Paradoxically, while peripheral self-tolerance exists for constitutively presented somatic self Ag, self-peptide recognized in the context of MHC class II has been shown to sensitize T cells for subsequent activation. We have shown that MHC class II(+)CD86(+)CD40(-) DC, which can be generated from bone marrow in the presence of an NF-kappa B inhibitor, and which constitutively populate peripheral tissues and lymphoid organs in naive animals, can induce Ag-specific tolerance. In this study, we show that CD40(-) human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC), generated in the presence of an NF-kappa B inhibitor, signal phosphorylation of TCR zeta, but little proliferation or IFN-gamma in vitro. Proliferation is arrested in the G(1)/G(0) phase of the cell cycle. Surprisingly, responding T cells are neither anergic nor regulatory, but are sensitized for subsequent IFN-gamma production. The data indicate that signaling through NF-kappa B determines the capacity of DC to stimulate T cell proliferation. Functionally, NF-kappa B(-)CD40(-)class II(+) DC may either tolerize or sensitize T cells. Thus, while CD40(-) DC appear to "prime" or prepare T cells, the data imply that signals derived from other cells drive the generation either of Ag-specific regulatory or effector cells in vivo.     

Role of B7 in T cell tolerance

The induction of effective immune responses requires costimulation by B7 molecules, and Ag recognition without B7 is thought to result in no response or tolerance. We compared T cell responses in vivo to the same Ag presented either by mature dendritic cells (DCs) or as self, in the presence or absence of B7. We show that Ag presentation by mature B7-1/2-deficient DCs fails to elicit an effector T cell response but does not induce tolerance. In contrast, using a newly developed adoptive transfer system, we show that naive OVA-specific DO11 CD4+ T cells become anergic upon encounter with a soluble form of OVA, in the presence or absence of B7. However, tolerance in DO11 cells transferred into soluble OVA transgenic recipients can be broken by immunization with Ag-pulsed DCs only in B7-deficient mice and not in wild-type mice, suggesting a role of B7 in maintaining tolerance in the presence of strong immunogenic signals. Comparing two double-transgenic models--expressing either a soluble or a tissue Ag--we further show that B7 is not only essential for the active induction of regulatory T cells in the thymus, but also for their maintenance in the periphery. Thus, the obligatory role of B7 molecules paradoxically is to promote effective T cell priming and contain effector responses when self-Ags are presented as foreign.     

Mechanisms underlying blockade of allograft acceptance by TLR ligands

Immune activation via TLRs is known to prevent transplantation tolerance in multiple animal models. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this barrier to tolerance induction, we used complementary murine models of skin and cardiac transplantation in which prolonged allograft acceptance is either spontaneous or pharmacologically induced with anti-CD154 mAb and rapamycin. In each model, we found that prolonged allograft survival requires the presence of natural CD4(+)Foxp3(+) T regulatory cells (Tregs), and that the TLR9 ligand CpG prevents graft acceptance both by interfering with natural Treg function and by promoting the differentiation of Th1 effector T cells in vivo. We further demonstrate that although Th17 cells differentiate from naive alloreactive T cells, these cells do not arise from natural Tregs in either CpG-treated or untreated graft recipients. Finally, we show that CpG impairs natural Treg suppressor capability and prevents Treg-dependent allograft acceptance in an IL-6-independent fashion. Our data therefore suggest that TLR signals do not prevent prolonged graft acceptance by directing natural Tregs into the Th17 lineage or by using other IL-6-dependent mechanisms. Instead, graft destruction results from the ability of CpG to drive Th1 differentiation and interfere with immunoregulation established by alloreactive natural CD4(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs.     

Early events in peripheral regulatory T cell induction via the nasal mucosa

Nasal application of soluble Ags leads to Ag-specific suppression of systemic immune responses. This tolerance can be transferred to naive mice by CD4(+) regulatory T cells (T(R) cells) from the spleen, but little is known about the induction of mucosal T(R) cells in vivo. To investigate the induction of T(R) cells in the nose-draining cervical lymph node (CLN), CD4(+) T cells from DO11.10 OVA TCR transgenic mice were transferred to BALB/c recipients. Within 48 h after nasal OVA application, CD4(+) DO11.10 T cells in CLN, but not in the peripheral lymph node, had divided. Similarly, nonmucosal (i.m.) OVA application also induced CD4(+) DO11.10 T cells to proliferate in the draining inguinal lymph node (ILN), yet more vigorously and with different kinetics than the CD4(+) DO11.10 T cells in CLN. Functional analysis revealed that only proliferating CD4(+) DO11.10 T cells from CLN, and not ILN, could transfer tolerance to naive recipients. CD4(+) DO11.10 T cells from CLN were phenotypically similar to CD4(+) DO11.10 T cells from ILN, however, in CLN a higher percentage of CD25(+) proliferating CD4(+) DO11.10 T cells were detected compared with ILN. CD25 is not a discriminative marker for mucosal T(R) cells because both CD25(+) and CD25(-) CD4(+) DO11.10 T cells from the CLN could suppress delayed type hypersensitivity responses in adoptive transfer. These findings demonstrate that although striking similarities exist between the differentiation of T(R) and effector T cells, this does not include their function. We are the first to demonstrate that functional T(R) cells, which reside within both CD25(+) and CD25(-) subsets, can be isolated from CLN as early as 3 days after nasal OVA application.