Free filet extremity flap: indications and options for reconstruction

Radical and extended forequarter and hind limb amputations have been used for curative and palliative intents. Concerns regarding wound healing and closure, especially in irradiated fields, have occasionally limited the extent of ablation. This article reports an experience with coverage of these large defects by using the free filet extremity flap. A retrospective review was performed of 11 patients who had undergone immediate reconstruction with free filet extremity flaps between 1991 and 1998. There were nine men and two women with an average age of 43.9 years. All except three patients received preoperative radiotherapy. Resections included four hindquarter and seven forequarter amputations for palliation of intractable pain, tissue necrosis, and infections. Donor vessels included the brachial artery, its venae comitantes, cephalic and basilic veins, and common femoral and popliteal vessels. Immediate reconstruction was successful in all cases by the use of the amputated limb as the free filet flap. All wounds healed despite irradiation inclusive of defects up to 50 cm x 70 cm (3500 cm2). The average follow-up time was 5 months with a mean survival of 3.5 months. Four patients currently are alive, and one patient died within 30 days of surgery. The remaining six patients have died of their disease within 9 months of the palliative procedures. Pain, tissue necrosis, and infections were improved in all patients after hospital discharge. Extensive defects can be reconstructed and healed successfully, even in irradiated wounds, with the use of the free filet extremity flap. Appropriate advanced preoperative and intraoperative planning is essential. Although survival was unchanged, this technique allowed healed wounds with an improvement in the quality of life.     

Regional intravascular sympathetic blockade for better results in flap surgery: an experimental study of free flaps, island flaps, and pedicle flaps in the rabbit ear

Flap survival is still a major problem in reconstructive surgery. Increased flap survival after systemic administration of drugs inhibiting the adrenergic system has been reported in experimental studies. The clinical use, however, is restricted by systemic side effects. It has been demonstrated that, using guanethidine, an effective regional intravascular sympathetic (RIS) block can be obtained without systemic effects. Using this type of block, an experimental study was made on the survival and quality of different types of flaps in the rabbit ear. The results obtained in 72 flaps created in the ears of 36 rabbits were assessed by the extent of flap edema, peripheral neovascularization, flap temperature, and flap surviving area. The RIS block reduced edema and scab formation, caused higher flap temperatures, better neovascularization, and increased surviving flap area, as compared with equal flaps in the untreated contralateral ear of the same animal. The effect of RIS block may be considered as a "pharmacological delay" procedure. From the experiments as well as clinical experience, it may be concluded that this technique is a safe and effective procedure. Therefore, the RIS block method is recommended for clinical use in flap techniques in extremities of man.     

Two new cutaneous free flaps: the medial and lateral thigh flaps

Two new cutaneous free-flap donor areas are described on the medial and lateral sides of the thigh. The medial thigh flap is supplied by an unnamed artery from the superficial femoral artery and is drained by the accompanying venae comitantes. Its nerve supply is from the medial femoral cutaneous nerve. The lateral thigh flap has its vascular pedicle from the third perforating artery of the profunda femoral artery and its accompanying vein. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve provides sensation over the area. These flaps provide a large surface area of both skin and subcutaneous tissue without the usual bulk of subcutaneous fat and muscle. Their desirable features include long vascular pedicles with large vessel diameters and potential of being neurovascular flaps with specific sensory nerve supply and predictable anatomy. The principal disadvantage is that the donor site may leave a slight contour defect with primary closure or require grafting when a large flap is taken. We predict that these flaps will become important donor sites for reconstructive problems requiring resurfacing of cutaneous defects in various anatomic areas.     

The concept of fillet flaps: classification, indications, and analysis of their clinical value

Tissue of amputated or nonsalvageable limbs may be used for reconstruction of complex defects resulting from tumor and trauma. This is the "spare parts" concept.By definition, fillet flaps are axial-pattern flaps that can function as composite-tissue transfers. They can be used as pedicled or free flaps and are a beneficial reconstruction strategy for major defects, provided there is tissue available adjacent to these defects.From 1988 to 1999, 104 fillet flap procedures were performed on 94 patients (50 pedicled finger and toe fillets, 36 pedicled limb fillets, and 18 free microsurgical fillet flaps).Nineteen pedicled finger fillets were used for defects of the dorsum or volar aspect of the hand, and 14 digital defects and 11 defects of the forefoot were covered with pedicled fillets from adjacent toes and fingers. The average size of the defects was 23 cm2. Fourteen fingers were salvaged. Eleven ray amputations, two extended procedures for coverage of the hand, and nine forefoot amputations were prevented. In four cases, a partial or total necrosis of a fillet flap occurred (one patient with diabetic vascular disease, one with Dupuytren's contracture, and two with high-voltage electrical injuries).Thirty-six pedicled limb fillet flaps were used in 35 cases. In 12 cases, salvage of above-knee or below-knee amputated stumps was achieved with a plantar neurovascular island pedicled flap. In seven other cases, sacral, pelvic, groin, hip, abdominal wall, or lumbar defects were reconstructed with fillet-of-thigh or entire-limb fillet flaps. In five cases, defects of shoulder, head, neck, and thoracic wall were covered with upper-arm fillet flaps. In nine cases, defects of the forefoot were covered by adjacent dorsal or plantar fillet flaps. In two other cases, defects of the upper arm or the proximal forearm were reconstructed with a forearm fillet. The average size of these defects was 512 cm2. Thirteen major joints were salvaged, three stumps were lengthened, and nine foot or forefoot amputations were prevented. One partial flap necrosis occurred in a patient with a fillet-of-sole flap. In another case, wound infection required revision and above-knee amputation with removal of the flap.Nine free plantar fillet flaps were performed-five for coverage of amputation stumps and four for sacral pressure sores. Seven free forearm fillet flaps, one free flap of forearm and hand, and one forearm and distal upper-arm fillet flap were performed for defect coverage of the shoulder and neck area. The average size of these defects was 432 cm2. Four knee joints were salvaged and one above-knee stump was lengthened. No flap necrosis was observed. One patient died of acute respiratory distress syndrome 6 days after surgery.Major complications were predominantly encountered in small finger and toe fillet flaps. Overall complication rate, including wound dehiscence and secondary grafting, was 18 percent. This complication rate seems acceptable. Major complications such as flap loss, flap revision, or severe infection occurred in only 7.5 percent of cases. The majority of our cases resulted from severe trauma with infected and necrotic soft tissues, disseminated tumor disease, or ulcers in elderly, multimorbid patients.On the basis of these data, a classification was developed that facilitates multicenter comparison of procedures and their clinical success. Fillet flaps facilitate reconstruction in difficult and complex cases. The spare part concept should be integrated into each trauma algorithm to avoid additional donor-site morbidity and facilitate stump-length preservation or limb salvage.     

Heterodigital arterialized flaps for large finger wounds: results and indications

Deep defects of the hand and fingers with an unhealthy bed exposing denuded tendon, bone, joint, or neurovascular structures require flap coverage. However, the location and size of the defects often preclude the use of local flap coverage. Free-flap coverage is often not desirable either, because the recipient vessels may be unhealthy from surrounding infection or trauma. In such situations, a regional pedicled flap is preferable. A solution to this is the heterodigital arterialized flap. This flap is supplied by the digital artery and a dorsal vein of the finger for venous drainage. Unlike the neurovascular island flap, the digital nerve is left in situ in the donor finger, thus avoiding many of the neurologic complications associated with the Littler flap. The digital artery island flap is centered on the midlateral line of the donor finger. It extends from the middorsal line to the midpalmar line. The maximal length of the flap is from the base of the finger to the distal interphalangeal joint. By preserving the pulp and the digital nerve, a sensate pulp on the donor finger remains that reduces donor-finger morbidity and also preserves fingertip cosmesis. Twenty-nine flaps were performed in 29 patients and the outcomes in the donor finger and the reconstructed finger were reviewed. The flap survival was 100 percent. There were no cases of flap ischemia or flap congestion. Good venous drainage of the flap through the additional dorsal vein was helpful in preventing the occurrence of early postoperative venous congestion, which is common in island flaps of the fingers, which depend on only the venae comitantes for drainage. Donor-finger morbidity, measured in terms of range of motion and two-point discrimination in the pulp, was minimal. Ninety-seven percent of the donor fingers achieved excellent or good total active motion according to the criteria of Strickland and Glogovac. Pulp sensation in the donor fingers was normal in 28 of the 29 donor fingers. No cold intolerance of the donor finger or the adjacent finger is reported in this series.     

Deltopectoral skin flap as a free skin flap revisited: further refinement in flap design, fabrication, and clinical usage

The deltopectoral skin flap is an axial flap; therefore, it can be fashioned as a free skin flap. Although color and texture of the skin are well suited for facial resurfacing, the structural features of inconsistent thickness of the skin, a short vascular pedicle, a minute caliber of the nutrient vessel, and donor site morbidity often preclude the use of this flap for this purpose. The deltopectoral skin flap fabricated as a free skin flap transferred by means of a microsurgical technique was used in 27 patients between 1985 and 1998 at our hospital. The anterior perforating branches of the internal mammary vessels were the primary nutrient vessels of the flap in seven instances. The external caliber of this artery varied between 0.6 mm and 1.2 mm, with an average size of 0.9 mm. The size of the accompanying vein varied between 1.5 mm and 3.2 mm, with an average of 2.3 mm. Coaptation of these vessels with those in the recipient site was technically difficult. Thrombosis occurred at the anastomotic site in three patients, requiring reoperation. Two flaps were saved. The flap failure was drastically reduced in the remaining 20 patients by including a segment of the internal mammary vessel when fabricating the vascular pedicle. The size of the internal mammary arterial segment averaged 2.1 mm, and the average size of the accompanying vein was 2.9 mm. The problem of a bulky flap was managed by surgical defatting/thinning of the flap at the time of flap fabrication and transfer. A V-to-Y skin flap advancement technique of wound closure was used in eight individuals. The flap donor-site morbidities were minimized with this method of wound closure.     

Free flaps in the elderly.

Microsurgical transfer of tissue has become a primary tool of the reconstructive surgeon. The elderly, as a growing segment of our society, are requiring free-tissue transfers in proportion to their numbers. To investigate the potential morbidity of free-tissue transfers in the elderly, we studied consecutive populations of 31 patients above the age of 65 years and 90 patients below the age of 65 years. Complication rates were 65 and 49 percent, respectively. Premorbid medical conditions were present in 87 percent of patients 65 years and older and in 72 percent of those under 65 years. Medically related complications in free-tissue transfers, previously unreported in the literature, were 35 percent in the elderly group and 10 percent in the younger group. Wound-healing complications were seen in equal proportions between groups. The rates of wound and medically related complications observed in the elderly group were nearly double those observed in the younger group; however, after correction for the presence of preexisting medical conditions, no significant differences were seen between the two groups. These observations suggest that age alone is not a variable in risk for free-tissue transfers. Elective microsurgery can be performed in the elderly patient with a high expectation of success.     

The dorsalis pedis free flap: technique of elevation, foot closure, and flap application

The dorsalis pedis free flap is an excellent reconstructive tool for thin remote mucosal defects, for heel and hand defects where innervation is critical, and as an osteocutaneous flap with unique application to mandibular and floor of mouth reconstruction. The major criticism with this flap is related to its uncertain vascularity and the donor defect. We have found in our series of 45 cases that the vascular anatomy is exceedingly reliable. Problems with the donor defects are all related to technique. With care in flap elevation and foot closure, which we describe in detail, an acceptable donor site with minimal complications can be achieved. The clinical applications of this flap are illustrated by three case reports. Our experience with the donor site has not been problem-free. However, we do believe that with meticulous technique primary healing will occur without functional disability and with minimal cosmetic deformity.