Socioeconomic status and cancer survival in Brazil: Analysis of population data from the municipalities of Aracaju and Curitiba, 1996–2012

IntroductionThe association between socioeconomic status and cancer prognosis has been demonstrated in several countries. Despite the existence of indirect evidence of this phenomenon in Brazil, few studies in this regard are available.ObjectivesThe objective of the present study is to analyse socioeconomic related survival gaps for patients diagnosed with breast, cervical, lung, prostate, and colorectal cancer in the cities of Aracaju (SE) and Curitiba (PR).MethodsUsing population-based data, we estimated net survival by tumour site, year of diagnosis, socioeconomic status and local of residence. Net survival estimation was done with multilevel parametric model allowing flexible spline functions do estimate excess mortality hazards.Results28,005 cases were included in survival analysis. Five-year net survival showed positive association with SES. Intermunicipal survival gaps favouring Aracaju where prominent for breast (reaching 16,1% in 5 years)ObjectivesStudy the impact of socioeconomic factors on cancer survival in two Brazilian capitals. Methods: Survival analysis using population-based cancer data including patients diagnosed with breast, lung, prostate, cervical and colorectal cancer between 1996 and 2012 in Aracaju and Curitiba. Outcomes were excessive mortality hazard (EMH) and 5- and 8-years net survival (NS). The association of race/skin color and socioeconomic level (SES) with EMH and net survival were analyzed using a multilevel regression model with flexible splines.Results28,005 cases were included, 6636 from Aracaju and 21,369 from Curitiba. NS for all diseases studied increased more prominently for Curitiba population. We observed NS gap between the populations of Aracaju and Curitiba that increased or remained stable during the study period, with emphasis on the growth of the difference in NS of lung and colon cancer (among men). Only for cervical cancer and prostate cancer there was a reduction in the intermunicipal gaps. 5-year NS for breast cancer in Aracaju ranged from 55.2% to 73.4% according to SES. In Curitiba this variation was from 66.5% to 83.8%.ConclusionThe results of the present study suggests widening of socioeconomic and regional inequalities in the survival of patients with colorectal, breast, cervical, lung and prostate cancers in Brazil during the 1990 s and 2000 s     

Regional disparities in cancer survival in Iran: Insight from a National Surveillance of Cancer Survival in Iran (IRANCANSURV)

Background and objectivesWe aimed to investigate geographical disparity in cancer survival in 9 provincial population-based cancer registries in Iran from 2015 to 2016.Material and methodIn the current study, data from 90,862 adult patients (aged >15 years) diagnosed with cancer were retrieved from 9 population-based cancer registries across Iran. Five-year survival rates were estimated by applying relative survival approaches. We also applied the international cancer survival standard weights for age standardization. Finally, we calculated the excess hazard ratio (EHR) for each province adjusted for age, sex, and cancer sites to estimate the excess hazard ratio of mortality compared to the capital province (Tehran).ResultsThe largest gap in survival was observed in more curable cancer types, including melanoma (41.4%), ovary (32.3%), cervix (35.0%), prostate (26.7%), and rectum (21.4%), while the observed geographical disparity in lethal cancers such as lung, brain, stomach, and pancreas was less than 15%. Compared to Tehran, we found the highest excess hazard of death in Western Azerbaijan (EHR=1.60, 95% CI 1.51, 1.65), Kermanshah (EHR=1.52, 95% CI=1.44, 1.61), and Kerman (EHR=1.46, 95% CI=1.38, 1.53). The hazard ratio of death was almost identical in Isfahan (EHR=1.04, 95% CI=1.03, 1.06) and Tehran provinces.ConclusionProvinces with higher HDI had better survival rates. IRANCANSURV study showed regional disparities in cancer survival in Iran. Cancer patients in provinces with a higher Human Development Index (HDI) had a higher survival rate and lived longer compared to the patients in provinces with medium and low HDI regions.     

Multiple mediation analysis of racial disparity in breast cancer survival

BackgroundRacial (Black vs. White) disparities in breast cancer survival have proven difficult to mitigate. Targeted strategies aimed at the primary factors driving the disparity offer the greatest potential for success. The purpose of this study was to use multiple mediation analysis to identify the most important mediators of the racial disparity in breast cancer survival.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in Florida between 2004 and 2015. Cox regression was used to obtain unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of race with 5- and 10-year breast cancer death. Multiple mediation analysis of tumor (advanced disease stage, tumor grade, hormone receptor status) and treatment-related factors (receipt of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy) was used to determine the most important mediators of the survival disparity.ResultsThe study population consisted of 101,872 women of whom 87.0% (n = 88,617) were White and 13.0% were Black (n = 13,255). Black women experienced 2.3 times (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 2.16–2.38) the rate of 5-year breast cancer death over the follow-up period, which decreased to a 38% increased rate (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.31–1.45) after adjustment for age and the mediators of interest. Combined, all examined mediators explained 73% of the racial disparity in 5-year breast cancer survival. The most important mediators were: (1) advanced disease stage (44.8%), (2) nonreceipt of surgery (34.2%), and (3) tumor grade (18.2%) and hormone receptor status (17.6%). Similar results were obtained for 10-year breast cancer death.ConclusionThese results suggest that additional efforts to increase uptake of screening mammography in hard-to-reach women, and, following diagnosis, access to and receipt of surgery may offer the greatest potential to reduce racial disparities in breast cancer survival for women in Florida.     

The impact of health insurance affiliation and socioeconomic status on cervical cancer survival in Bucaramanga,Colombia

Cervical cancer is still an important cause of death in countries like Colombia. We aimed to determine whether socioeconomic status of residential address (SES) and type of health insurance affiliation (HIA) might be associated with cervical cancer survival among women in Bucaramanga, Colombia. All patients residing in the Bucaramanga Metropolitan Area diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer (ICD-0–3 codes C53.X) between 2008 and 2016 (n = 725) were identified through the population-based cancer registry, with 700 women having follow-up data for >5 years (date of study closure: Dec 31, 2021), yielding an overall 5-year survival estimate (95 % CI) of 56.4 % (52.7 – 60.0 %). KM estimates of 5-year overall survival were obtained to assess differences in cervical cancer survival by SES and HIA. Multivariable Cox-proportional hazards modeling was also conducted, including interaction effects between SES and HIA. Five-year overall survival was lower when comparing low vs. high SES (41.9 % vs 57.9 %, p < 0.0001) and subsidized vs. contributive HIA (45.1 % vs 63.0 %, p < 0.0001). Multivariable Cox modeling showed increased hazard ratios (HR) of death for low vs. high SES (HR = 1.78; 95 % CI = 1.18–2.70) and subsidized vs. contributive HIA (HR = 1.44; 95 % CI = 1.13–1.83). The greatest disparity in HR was among women of low SES affiliated to subsidized HIA (vs. contributive HIA and high SES) (HR=2.53; 95 % CI = 1.62–3.97). Despite Colombia’s universal healthcare system, important disparities in cervical cancer survival by health insurance affiliation and socioeconomic status remain.     

Impact of geographic area level on measuring socioeconomic disparities in cancer survival in New South Wales,Australia: A period analysis

BackgroundArea-based socioeconomic measures are widely used in health research. In theory, the larger the area used the more individual misclassification is introduced, thus biasing the association between such area level measures and health outcomes. In this study, we examined the socioeconomic disparities in cancer survival using two geographic area-based measures to see if the size of the area matters.MethodsWe used population-based cancer registry data for patients diagnosed with one of 10 major cancers in New South Wales (NSW), Australia during 2004–2008. Patients were assigned index measures of socioeconomic status (SES) based on two area-level units, census Collection District (CD) and Local Government Area (LGA) of their address at diagnosis. Five-year relative survival was estimated using the period approach for patients alive during 2004–2008, for each socioeconomic quintile at each area-level for each cancer. Poisson-regression modelling was used to adjust for socioeconomic quintile, sex, age-group at diagnosis and disease stage at diagnosis. The relative excess risk of death (RER) by socioeconomic quintile derived from this modelling was compared between area-units.ResultsWe found extensive disagreement in SES classification between CD and LGA levels across all socioeconomic quintiles, particularly for more disadvantaged groups. In general, more disadvantaged patients had significantly lower survival than the least disadvantaged group for both CD and LGA classifications. The socioeconomic survival disparities detected by CD classification were larger than those detected by LGA. Adjusted RER estimates by SES were similar for most cancers when measured at both area levels.ConclusionsWe found that classifying patient SES by the widely used Australian geographic unit LGA results in underestimation of survival disparities for several cancers compared to when SES is classified at the geographically smaller CD level. Despite this, our RER of death estimates derived from these survival estimates were generally similar for both CD and LGA level analyses, suggesting that LGAs remain a valuable spatial unit for use in Australian health and social research, though the potential for misclassification must be considered when interpreting research. While data confidentiality concerns increase with the level of geographical precision, the use of smaller area-level health and census data in the future, with appropriate allowance for confidentiality     

Variation in the relationship between BMI and survival by socioeconomic status in Great Britain

We investigate the relationship between obesity and survival, and the extent to which this relationship varies by socioeconomic status (SES). The underlying model is based on the “Pathways to health” framework in which SES affects health by modifying the relationship between lifestyles and health. We use data from the British Health and Lifestyle Survey (1984–1985) and the longitudinal follow-up in June 2009, and run parametric Gompertz survival models to investigate the association between obesity and survival, also accounting for interactions between obesity and both age and SES. Generally we find that obesity is negatively associated with survival, and that SES is positively associated with survival, in both men and women. The interactions between obesity and SES predict survival among women but not among men. Obesity compared with normal weight is associated with a reduction in survival of 3.3, 3.2 and 2.8 years in men aged 40, 50 and 60 years, respectively. Corresponding numbers among women in the lowest SES group are 13.1, 9.7 and 6.1 years, respectively; in the highest SES group they are 6.2, 3.1 and 0.1 years, respectively, a difference of approximately 6 years between the highest and lowest SES groups.     

Disparities in survival improvement for U.S. childhood and adolescent cancer between 1995 and 2019: An analysis of population-based data

BackgroundAlthough treatment advances have increased childhood and adolescent cancer survival, whether patient subgroups have benefited equally from these improvements is unclear.MethodsData on 42,865 malignant primary cancers diagnosed between 1995 and 2019 in individuals ≤ 19 years were obtained from 12 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer-specific mortality by age group (0–14 and 15–19 years), sex, and race/ethnicity were estimated using flexible parametric models with a restricted cubic spline function in each of the periods: 2000–2004, 2005–2009, 2010–2014 and 2015–2019, versus 1995–1999. Interactions between diagnosis period and age group (children 0–14 and adolescents 15–19 years at diagnosis), sex, and race/ethnicity were assessed using likelihood ratio tests. Five-year cancer-specific survival rates for each diagnosis period were further predicted.ResultsCompared with the 1995–1999 cohort, the risk of dying from all cancers combined decreased in subgroups defined by age, sex and race/ethnicity with HRs ranging from 0.50 to 0.68 for the 2015–2019 comparison. HRs were more variable by cancer subtype. There were no statistically significant interactions by age group (P_interaction=0.05) or sex (P_interaction=0.71). Despite non-significant differences in cancer-specific survival improvement across different races and ethnicities (P_interaction=0.33) over the study period, minorities consistently experienced inferior survival compared with non-Hispanic Whites.ConclusionsThe substantial improvements in cancer-specific survival for childhood and adolescent cancer did not differ significantly by different age, sex, and race/ethnicity groups. However, persistent gaps in survival between minorities and non-Hispanic Whites are noteworthy.     

Sequential matched analysis of racial disparities in breast cancer hospitalization outcomes among African American and White patients

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to determine if racial disparities in inpatient outcomes persist among hospitalized patients comparing African American and White breast cancer patients matched on demographics, presentation and treatment.MethodsA total of 136,211 African American and White breast cancer patients from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project − Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) database, matched on demographics alone, demographics and presentation or demographics, presentation and treatment were studied. Conditional logistic regression was conducted to evaluate post-surgical complications, length of stay and in-hospital mortality outcomes. Analysis was further stratified by age (≤65 years and >65 years) to evaluate whether disparities were larger in younger or older patients. All analysis was conducted using SAS 9.3.ResultsWhite women had significantly shorter hospital length of stay when matched on demographics (β= −0.87, p-value = < 0.0001), demographics and presentation (β= −0.63, p-value = < 0.0001), and demographics, presentation and treatment (β= −0.51, p-value = < 0.0001) compared with African Americans. White women also had lower odds of mortality compared with African American women when matched on demographics (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.65-0.79), demographics and presentation (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.85), or matched on demographics, presentation and treatment (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88). The racial difference observed in length of stay and mortality was larger in the age group ≤65 years compared with >65 yearsConclusionAfrican American women experienced higher odds of inpatient mortality and longer length of stay compared with White women even after accounting for differences in demographics, presentation and treatment characteristics.     

Socioeconomic status,human papillomavirus,and overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in Toronto,Canada

BackgroundDespite universal healthcare in some countries, lower socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with worse cancer survival. The influence of SES on head and neck cancer (HNC) survival is of immense interest, since SES is associated with the risk and prognostic factors associated with this disease.Patients and methodsNewly diagnosed HNC patients from 2003 to 2010 (n = 2124) were identified at Toronto’s Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Principal component analysis was used to calculate a composite score using neighbourhood-level SES variables obtained from the 2006 Canada Census. Associations of SES with overall survival were evaluated in HNC subsets and by p16 status (surrogate for human papillomavirus).ResultsSES score was higher for oral cavity (n = 423) and p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC, n = 404) patients compared with other disease sites. Lower SES was associated with worse survival [HR 1.14 (1.06–1.22), p = 0.0002], larger tumor staging (p < 0.001), current smoking (p < 0.0001), heavier alcohol consumption (p < 0.0001), and greater comorbidity (p < 0.0002), but not with treatment regimen (p > 0.20). After adjusting for age, sex, and stage, the lowest SES quintile was associated with the worst survival only for OPC patients [HR 1.66 (1.09–2.53), n = 832], primarily in the p16-negative subset [HR 1.63 (0.96–2.79)]. The predictive ability of the prognostic models improved when smoking/alcohol was added to the model (c-index 0.71 vs. 0.69), but addition of SES did not (c-index 0.69).ConclusionSES was associated with survival, but this effect was lost after accounting for other factors (age, sex, TNM stage, smoking/alcohol). Lower SES was associated with greater smoking, alcohol consumption, comorbidity, and stage.     

The breast cancer paradox: A systematic review of the association between area-level deprivation and breast cancer screening uptake in Europe

Breast cancer rates are lower amongst women from more socio-economically deprived areas. However, their mortality rates are higher. One explanation of this breast cancer paradox is that women from more deprived areas are less likely to attend breast cancer screening programmes. This systematic review is the first to examine this issue in Europe. A systematic review of Embase, Medline and PsychINFO (from 2008 to 2019) was undertaken (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018083703). Observational studies were included if they were based in Europe, measured breast cancer screening uptake, compared at least two areas, included an area-level measure of socio-economic deprivation and were published in the English language. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist was used to assess study quality and risk of bias. Thirteen studies from seven different European countries met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. In ten of the thirteen studies, there was a significant negative association between screening uptake and area-level socio-economic deprivation – with women living in more socio-economically deprived neighbourhoods less likely to attend breast cancer screening. Although universal screening programmes were provided in most studies, there were still strong negative associations between screening uptake and area-level socio-economic deprivation. Future breast cancer screening strategies should acknowledge these challenges, and consider developing targeted interventions in more deprived areas to increase screening participation.     

Association between comorbidity and participation in breast and cervical cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundComorbidity is associated with poor outcomes for cancer patients but it is less clear how it influences cancer prevention and early detection. This review synthesizes evidence from studies that have quantified the association between comorbidity and participation in breast and cervical screening.MethodsPubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE databases were systematically searched using key terms related to cancer screening and comorbidity for original research articles published between 1 January 1991 and 21 March 2016. Two reviewers independently screened 1283 studies that met eligibility criteria related to Population (adult, non-cancer populations), Exposure (comorbidity), Comparison (a ‘no comorbidity’ group), and Outcome (participation in breast cancer or cervical screening). Data was extracted and risk of bias assessed using a standardised tool from the 22 studies identified for inclusion (17 breast; 13 cervical). Meta-analyses were performed for participation in breast and cervical screening, stratified by important study characteristics.ResultsThe majority of studies were conducted in the United States. Results of individual studies were variable. Most had medium to high risk of bias. Based on the three “low risk of bias” studies, mammography screening was less common among those with comorbidity (pooled Odds Ratio 0.66, 95%CI 0.44–0.88). The one “low risk of bias” study of cervical screening reported a negative association between comorbidity and participation.ConclusionWhile a definitive conclusion could not be drawn, the results from high quality studies suggest that women with comorbidity are less likely to participate in breast, and possibly cervical, cancer screening.     

Interactions between immunity,proliferation and molecular subtype in breast cancer prognosis

Background

Gene expression signatures indicative of tumor proliferative capacity and tumor-immune cell interactions have emerged as principal biology-driven predictors of breast cancer outcomes. How these signatures relate to one another in biological and prognostic contexts remains to be clarified.

Results

To investigate the relationship between proliferation and immune gene signatures, we analyzed an integrated dataset of 1,954 clinically annotated breast tumor expression profiles randomized into training and test sets to allow two-way discovery and validation of gene-survival associations. Hierarchical clustering revealed a large cluster of distant metastasis-free survival-associated genes with known immunological functions that further partitioned into three distinct immune metagenes likely reflecting B cells and/or plasma cells; T cells and natural killer cells; and monocytes and/or dendritic cells. A proliferation metagene allowed stratification of cases into proliferation tertiles. The prognostic strength of these metagenes was largely restricted to tumors within the highest proliferation tertile, though intrinsic subtype-specific differences were observed in the intermediate and low proliferation tertiles. In highly proliferative tumors, high tertile immune metagene expression equated with markedly reduced risk of metastasis whereas tumors with low tertile expression of any one of the three immune metagenes were associated with poor outcome despite higher expression of the other two metagenes.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that a productive interplay among multiple immune cell types at the tumor site promotes long-term anti-metastatic immunity in a proliferation-dependent manner. The emergence of a subset of effective immune responders among highly proliferative tumors has novel prognostic ramifications.     

Angiopoietin-2, an angiogenic regulator, promotes initial growth and survival of breast cancer metastases to the lung through the integrin-linked kinase (ILK)-AKT-B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) pathway

The early onsets of breast cancer metastasis involve cell retention, survival, and resistant to apoptosis and subsequent growth at target vascular beds and tissues in distant organs. We previously reported that angiopoietin-2 (Ang2), an angiogenic regulator stimulates MCF-7 breast tumor metastasis from their orthotopic sites to distant organs through the α(5)β(1) integrin/integrin-linked kinase (ILK)/Akt pathway. Here, by using an experimental tumor metastasis model and in vitro studies, we further dissect the underlying mechanism by which Ang2 promotes the initial growth and survival of MCF-7 breast cancer metastasis in the lung of animals. We show that Ang2 increases cell survival and suppresses cell apoptosis through ILK-induced phosphorylation of Akt1, Akt2, and up-regulation of Bcl-2 in breast cancer cells. Inhibition of ILK, Akt1, and Akt2, and their effector Bcl-2 diminishes Ang2-stimulated breast cancer cell survival and Ang2-attenuated apoptosis in vitro, and initial survival and growth of breast cancer metastasis in the lung of animals. Additionally, siRNA knockdown of endogenous Ang2 in three human metastatic breast cancer cell lines also inhibits phosphorylation of Akt, expression of Bcl-2, and tumor cell survival, migration, and increases cell apoptosis. Since increased expression of Ang2 correlates with elevated potential of human breast cancer metastasis in clinic, our data underscore the importance that up-regulated Ang2 not only stimulates breast cancer growth and metastasis at late stages of the process, but is also critical at the initiating stages of metastases onset, thereby suggesting Ang2 as a promising therapeutic target for treating patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Trends in incidence and survival analysis in non-melanoma skin cancer from 1994 to 2012 in Girona,Spain: A population-based study

IntroductionWe present an epidemiological study focused on Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC), including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), basal cell carcinoma (BCC), Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFS) and adnexal and skin appendages neoplasm (ASAN), a neoplasm understudied in cancer registries.Material and methodsWe analyze trends of incidence and survival of NMSC registered with the Cancer Registry of Girona, Spain.ResultsWe found 14389 cases of NMSC, accounting 3,474 SCC, 10729 BCC, 33 MCC, 61 DFSP and 71 ASAN. Incidence increased significantly in SCC and BCC with annual percentage of change of 1.6 and 1.5, respectively, but not in MCC, DFS or ASAN. Five-year relative survival for both sexes was 90.1% in SCC, 99.8% in BCC, 44.2% in MCC, 93.7% in DFS and 84% in ASAN.ConclusionsOur study confirms the increasing incidence and good survival of SCC and BCC and enhances knowledge on the epidemiology of the less incidental NMSC.     

Geographic variation in diagnostic and treatment interval,cancer stage and mortality among colorectal patients – An international comparison between Denmark and Scotland using data-linked cohorts

BackgroundRurald wellers with colorectal cancer have poorer outcomes than their urban counterparts. The reasons why are not known but are likely to be complex and be determined by an interplay between geography and health service organization. By comparing the associations related to travel-time to primary and secondary healthcare facilities in two neighbouring countries, Denmark and Scotland, we aimed to shed light on potential mechanisms.MethodsAnalysis was based on two comprehensive cohorts of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Denmark (2010−16) and Scotland (2007−14). Associations between travel-time and cancer pathway intervals, tumour stage at diagnosis and one-year mortality were analysed using generalised linear models. Travel-time was modelled using restricted cubic splines for each country and combined. Adjustments were made for key confounders.ResultsTravel-time to key healthcare facilities influenced the diagnostic experience and outcomes of CRC patients from Scotland and Denmark to some extent differently. The longest travel-times to a specialised hospital appeared to afford the most rapid secondary care interval, whereas moderate travel-times to hospital (about 20−60 min) appeared to impact on later stage and greater one-year mortality in Scotland, but not in Denmark. A U-shaped association was seen between travel-time to the GP and one year-mortality.ConclusionsThis is the first international data-linkage study to explore how different national geographies and health service structures may determine cancer outcomes. Future research should compare more countries and more cancer sites and evaluate the impact and implications of differences in national health service organisation.     

Trends of incidence and survival of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia between 1999 and 2014: A comparison between Swiss and American population-based cancer registries

BackgroundChronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare hematopoietic malignancy. Treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMA) was introduced between 2004 and 2006 but its impact on population-based survival remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate epidemiological characteristics and survival before and after introduction of HMA treatment.MethodsWe performed a population-based analysis of CMML cases reported to the Cantonal Cancer Registries in Switzerland (SWISS) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program from the United States for 1999–2006 (before HMA) and 2007–2014 (after HMA). Time trends were compared for these two time periods.Results423 and 4144 new CMML cases were reported to the SWISS and SEER registries, respectively. We observed an increasing proportion of older patients ≥75 years in the SWISS (50.3%–62.3%) compared to a decreasing one in the SEER population (59.1%–55.1%). Age standardized incidence-rates were similar and remained stable in both countries (0.32–0.38 per 100’000 py). Relative survival (RS) improved significantly in the SEER (3 years 27%–37%; 5 years 19%–23%; p < 0.001 for both) but remained stable in the SWISS population (3 years 48% to 40%; 5 years 34% to 26%; n.s. for both).ConclusionsWith the exception of opposing age-trends, epidemiologic characteristics are similar in both countries and comparable to other population-based registries. RS remains poor and different time trends of population-based survival cannot be faithfully explained by HMA but most likely by changes in diagnostic accuracy within prognostically distinct age-groups.