Comprehensive Search for DNA Polymerase in the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon,Pyrococcus furiosus

DNA polymerase activities were scanned in a Pyrococcus furiosus cell extract to identify all of the DNA polymerases in this organism. Three main fractions containing DNA polymerizing activity were subjected to Western blot analyses, which revealed that the main activities in each fraction were derived from three previously identified DNA polymerases. PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen), the sliding clamp of DNA polymerases, did not bind tightly to any of the three DNA polymerases. A primer usage preference was also shown for each purified DNA polymerase. Considering their biochemical properties, the roles of the three DNA polymerases during DNA replication in the cells are discussed.     

Eukaryotic error-prone DNA polymerases: The presumed roles in replication, repair, and mutagenesis

A number of error-prone DNA polymerases have been found in various eukaryotes, ranging from yeasts to mammals, including humans. According to partial homology of the primary structure, they are grouped into families B, X, and Y. These enzymes display a high infidelity on an intact DNA template, but they are accurate on a damaged template. Error-prone DNA polymerases are characterized by probabilities of base substitution or frameshift mutations ranging from 10^?3 to 7.5 · 10^?1 in an intact DNA, whereas the spontaneous mutagenesis rate per replicated nucleotide varies between 10^?10 and 10^?12. Low-fidelity polymerases are terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) and DNA polymerases β, ζ, κ, η, ι, λ, μ, and Rev1. The main characteristics of these enzymes are reviewed. None of them exhibits proofreading 3′ → 5′ exonuclease (PE) activity. The specialization of these polymerases consists in their capacity for synthesizing opposite DNA lesions (not eliminated by the numerous repair systems), which is explained by the flexibility of their active centers or a limited ability to express TdT activity. Classic DNA polymerases α, δ, ε, and γ cannot elongate primers with mismatched nucleotides at the 3′-end (which leads to replication block), whereas some specialized polymerases can catalyze this elongation. This is accompanied by overcoming the replication block, often at the expense of an increased mutagenesis rate. How can a cell exist under the conditions of this high infidelity of many DNA polymerase activities? Not all tissues of the body contain a complete set of low-fidelity DNA polymerases, although some of these enzymes are vitally important. In addition, cells “should not allow” error-prone DNA polymerases to work on undamaged DNA. After a lesion on the DNA template is bypassed, the cell should switch over from DNA synthesis catalyzed by specialized polymerases to the synthesis catalyzed by relatively high-fidelity DNA polymerases δ and ? (with an error frequency of 10^?5 to 10^?6) as soon as possible. This is done by forming complexes of polymerase δ or ? with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and replication factors RP-A and RF-C. These highly processive complexes show a greater affinity to correct primers than specialized DNA polymerases do. The fact that specialized DNA polymerases are distributive or weakly processive favors the switching. The fidelity of these polymerases is increased by the PE function of DNA polymerases δ and ε, as well as autonomous 3′ → 5′ exonucleases, which are widespread over the entire phylogenetic tree of eukaryotes. The exonuclease correction decelerates replication in the presence of lesions in the DNA template but increases its fidelity, which decreases the probability of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.     

Antimutator variants of DNA polymerases

Evolution balances DNA replication speed and accuracy to optimize replicative fitness and genetic stability. There is no selective pressure to improve DNA replication fidelity beyond the background mutation rate from other sources, such as DNA damage. However, DNA polymerases remain amenable to amino acid substitutions that lower intrinsic error rates. Here, we review these ‘antimutagenic’ changes in DNA polymerases and discuss what they reveal about mechanisms of replication fidelity. Pioneering studies with bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase (T4 Pol) established the paradigm that antimutator amino acid substitutions reduce replication errors by increasing proofreading efficiency at the expense of polymerase processivity. The discoveries of antimutator substitutions in proofreading-deficient ‘mutator’ derivatives of bacterial Pols I and III and yeast Pol δ suggest there must be additional antimutagenic mechanisms. Remarkably, many of the affected amino acid positions from Pol I, Pol III, and Pol δ are similar to the original T4 Pol substitutions. The locations of antimutator substitutions within DNA polymerase structures suggest that they may increase nucleotide selectivity and/or promote dissociation of primer termini from polymerases poised for misincorporation, leading to expulsion of incorrect nucleotides. If misincorporation occurs, enhanced primer dissociation from polymerase domains may improve proofreading in cis by an intrinsic exonuclease or in trans by alternate cellular proofreading activities. Together, these studies reveal that natural selection can readily restore replication error rates to sustainable levels following an adaptive mutator phenotype.     

The POL1 gene from the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, shows conserved amino acid blocks specific for eukaryotic DNA polymerases alpha

Summary The POL1 gene of the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, was isolated using a POL1 gene probe from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cloned and sequenced. This gene is unique and located on chromosome II. It includes a single 91 by intron and is transcribed into a mRNA of about 4500 nucleotides. The predicted protein coded for by the S. pombe POL1 gene is 1405 amino acid long and its calculated molecular weight is about 160000 daltons. This peptide contains seven amino acid blocks conserved among several DNA polymerases from different organisms and shares overall 37% and 34% identity with DNA polymerases alpha from S. cerevisiae and human cells, respectively. These results indicate that this gene codes for the S. pombe catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase alpha. The comparisons with human DNA polymerase alpha and with the budding yeast DNA polymerases alpha, delta and epsilon reveal conserved blocks of amino acids which are structurally and/or functionally specific only for eukaryotic alpha-type DNA polymerases.     

The hyperthermophilic euryarchaeota Pyrococcus abyssi likely requires the two DNA polymerases D and B for DNA replication

DNA polymerases carry out DNA synthesis during DNA replication, DNA recombination and DNA repair. During the past five years, the number of DNA polymerases in both eukarya and bacteria has increased to at least 19 and multiple biological roles have been assigned to many DNA polymerases. Archaea, the third domain of life, on the other hand, have only a subset of the eukaryotic-like DNA polymerases. The diversity among the archaeal DNA polymerases poses the intriguing question of their functional tasks. Here, we focus on the two identified DNA polymerases, the family B DNA polymerase B (PabpolB) and the family D DNA polymerase D (PabpolD) from the hyperthermophilic euryarchaeota Pyrococcus abyssi. Our data can be summarized as follows: (i) both Pabpols are DNA polymerizing enzymes exclusively; (ii) their DNA binding properties as tested in gel shift competition assays indicated that PabpolD has a preference for a primed template; (iii) PabPolD is a primer-directed DNA polymerase independently of the primer composition whereas PabpolB behaves as an exclusively DNA primer-directed DNA polymerase; (iv) PabPCNA is required for PabpolD to perform efficient DNA synthesis but not PabpolB; (v) PabpolD, but not PabpolB, contains strand displacement activity; (vii) in the presence of PabPCNA, however, both Pabpols D and B show strand displacement activity; and (viii) we show that the direct interaction between PabpolD and PabPCNA is DNA-dependent. Our data imply that PabPolD might play an important role in DNA replication likely together with PabpolB, suggesting that archaea require two DNA polymerases at the replication fork.     

DNA polymerases β and λ as potential participants of TLS during genomic DNA replication on the lagging strand

The main strategy used by pro-and eukaryotic cells for replication of damaged DNA is translesion synthesis (TLS). Here, we investigate the TLS process catalyzed by DNA polymerases β and λ on DNA substrates using mono-or dinucleotide gaps opposite damage located in the template strand. An analog of a natural apurinic/apyrimidinic site, the 3-hydroxy-2-hydroxymetylthetrahydrofuran residue (THF), was used as damage. DNA was synthesized in the presence of either Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺. DNA polymerases β and λ were able to catalyze DNA synthesis across THF only in the presence of Mn²⁺. Moreover, strand displacement synthesis was not observed. The primer was elongated by only one nucleotide. Another unusual aspect of the synthesis is that dTTP could not serve as a substrate in all cases. dATP was a preferential substrate for synthesis catalyzed by DNA polymerase β. As for DNA polymerase λ, dGMP was the only incorporated nucleotide out of four investigated. Modified on heterocyclic base photoreactive analogs of dCTP and dUTP showed substrate specificity for DNA polymerase β. In contrast, the dCTP analog modified on the exocyclic amino group was a substrate for DNA polymerase λ. We also observed that human replication protein A inhibited polymerase incorporation by both DNA polymerases β and λ on DNA templates containing damage.     

Replication protein A complex in Thermococcus kodakarensis interacts with DNA polymerases and helps their effective strand synthesis

Replication protein A (RPA) is an essential component of DNA metabolic processes. RPA binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and interacts with multiple DNA-binding proteins. In this study, we showed that two DNA polymerases, PolB and PolD, from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis interact directly with RPA in vitro. RPA was expected to play a role in resolving the secondary structure, which may stop the DNA synthesis reaction, in the template ssDNA. Our in vitro DNA synthesis assay showed that the pausing was resolved by RPA for both PolB and PolD. These results supported the fact that RPA interacts with DNA polymerases as a member of the replisome and is involved in the normal progression of DNA replication forks.     

Dideoxynucleoside triphosphates inhibit a late stage of SV40 DNA replicationin vitro

Summary The role of DNA polymerases in the replication of SV40 DNA was studied using a T-antigen-dependent assay supplemented with a human KB cell extract. Inhibition of DNA polymerase α by addition of aphidicolin or monoclonal antibodies prevented DNA synthesis, confirming the requirement for this enzyme in replication. The replication process was unaffected by ddTTP at a concentration (5 μM) inhibitory to DNA polymerases β and γ, however, higher concentrations of ddTTP (200 μM) caused an apparent accumulation of relaxed circular plasmid with a concomitant decrease in DNA synthesis. An analysis of this replication intermediate indicated that it was formed during the replication reaction and that the replicative cycle was nearly complete. A kinetic study of ddTTP inhibition strongly suggested DNA polymerase ε (PCNA-independent DNA polymerase δ) was the target of the inhibitor and that this enzyme functions during the final stages of DNA replication.     

DNA Polymerases that Propagate the Eukaryotic DNA Replication Fork

Abstract

Three DNA polymerases are thought to function at the eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Currently, a coherent model has been derived for the composition and activities of the lagging strand machinery. RNA-DNA primers are initiated by DNA polymerase α -primase. Loading of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen, PCNA, dissociates DNA polymerase α and recruits DNA polymerase δ and the flap endonuclease FEN1 for elongation and in preparation for its requirement during maturation, respectively. Nick translation by the strand displacement action of DNA polymerase δ, coupled with the nuclease action of FEN1, results in processive RNA degradation until a proper DNA nick is reached for closure by DNA ligase I. In the event of excessive strand displacement synthesis, other factors, such as the Dna2 nuclease/helicase, are required to trim excess flaps. Paradoxically, the composition and activity of the much simpler leading strand machinery has not been clearly established. The burden of evidence suggests that DNA polymerase ε normally replicates this strand, but under conditions of dysfunction, DNA polymerase δ may substitute.     

A direct proofreader–clamp interaction stabilizes the Pol III replicase in the polymerization mode

Processive DNA synthesis by the αεθ core of the Escherichia coli Pol III replicase requires it to be bound to the β₂ clamp via a site in the α polymerase subunit. How the ε proofreading exonuclease subunit influences DNA synthesis by α was not previously understood. In this work, bulk assays of DNA replication were used to uncover a non‐proofreading activity of ε. Combination of mutagenesis with biophysical studies and single‐molecule leading‐strand replication assays traced this activity to a novel β‐binding site in ε that, in conjunction with the site in α, maintains a closed state of the αεθ–β₂ replicase in the polymerization mode of DNA synthesis. The ε–β interaction, selected during evolution to be weak and thus suited for transient disruption to enable access of alternate polymerases and other clamp binding proteins, therefore makes an important contribution to the network of protein–protein interactions that finely tune stability of the replicase on the DNA template in its various conformational states.     

A 17S multiprotein form of murine cell DNA polymerase mediates polyomavirus DNA replication in vitro

We have identified and purified a multiprotein form of DNA polymerase from the murine mammary carcinoma cell line (FM3A) using a series of centrifugation, polyethylene glycol precipitation, and ion-exchange chromatography steps. Proteins and enzymatic activities associated with this mouse cell multiprotein form of DNA polymerase include the DNA polymerases α and δ, DNA primase, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), DNA ligase I, DNA helicase, and DNA topoisomerases I and II. The sedimentation coefficient of the multiprotein form of DNA polymerase is 17S, as determined by sucrose density gradient analysis. The integrity of the murine cell multiprotein form of DNA polymerase is maintained after treatment with detergents, salt, RNase, DNase, and after chromatography on DE52-cellulose, suggesting that the association of the proteins with one another is independent of nonspecific interaction with other cellular macromolecular components. Most importantly, we have demonstrated that this complex of proteins is fully competent to replicate polyomavirus DNA in vitro. This result implies that all of the cellular activities required for large T-antigen dependent in vitro polyomavirus DNA synthesis are present within the isolated 17S multiprotein form of the mouse cell DNA replication activities. A model is proposed to represent the mammalian Multiprotein DNA Replication Complex (MRC) based on the fractionation and chromatographic profiles of the individual proteins found to co-purify with the complex.     

Translesion synthesis in mammalian cells

DNA damage blocks the progression of the replication fork. In order to circumvent the damaged bases, cells employ specialized low stringency DNA polymerases, which are able to carry out translesion synthesis (TLS) past different types of damage. The five polymerases used in TLS in human cells have different substrate specificities, enabling them to deal with many different types of damaged bases. PCNA plays a central role in recruiting the TLS polymerases and effecting the polymerase switch from replicative to TLS polymerase. When the fork is blocked PCNA gets ubiquitinated. This increases its affinity for the TLS polymerases, which all have novel ubiquitin-binding motifs, thereby facilitating their engagement at the stalled fork to effect TLS.     

Structural diversity and dynamics of genomic replication origins in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

DNA replication origins (ORI) in Schizosaccharomyces pombe colocalize with adenine and thymine (A+T)‐rich regions, and earlier analyses have established a size from 0.5 to over 3 kb for a DNA fragment to drive replication in plasmid assays. We have asked what are the requirements for ORI function in the chromosomal context. By designing artificial ORIs, we have found that A+T‐rich fragments as short as 100 bp without homology to S. pombe DNA are able to initiate replication in the genome. On the other hand, functional dissection of endogenous ORIs has revealed that some of them span a few kilobases and include several modules that may be as short as 25–30 contiguous A+Ts capable of initiating replication from ectopic chromosome positions. The search for elements with these characteristics across the genome has uncovered an earlier unnoticed class of low‐efficiency ORIs that fire late during S phase. These results indicate that ORI specification and dynamics varies widely in S. pombe, ranging from very short elements to large regions reminiscent of replication initiation zones in mammals.     

phi29 DNA polymerase residue Phe128 of the highly conserved (S/T)Lx(2)h motif is required for a stable and functional interaction with the terminal protein

Bacteriophage phi29 encodes a DNA-dependent DNA polymerase belonging to the eukaryotic-type (family B) subgroup of DNA polymerases that use a protein as primer for initiation of DNA replication. By multiple sequence alignments of DNA polymerases from such a family, we have been able to identify two amino acid residues specifically conserved in the protein-priming subgroup of DNA polymerases, a phenylalanine contained in the (S/T)Lx(2)h motif, and a glutamate belonging to the Exo III motif. Here, we have studied the functional role of these residues in reactions that are specific for DNA polymerases that use a protein-primed DNA replication mechanism, by site-directed mutagenesis in the corresponding amino acid residues, Phe128 and Glu161 of phi29 DNA polymerase. Mutations introduced at residue Phe128 severely impaired the protein-primed replication capacity of the polymerase, being the interaction with the terminal protein (TP) moderately (mutant F128A) or severely (mutant F128Y) diminished. As a consequence, very few initiation products were obtained, and essentially no transition products were detected. Interestingly, phi29 DNA polymerase mutant F128Y showed a decreased binding affinity for short template DNA molecules. These results, together with the high degree of conservation of Phe128 residue among protein-primed DNA polymerases, suggest a functional role for this amino acid residue in making contacts with the TP during the first steps of genome replication and with DNA in the further replication steps.     

Genetic evidence that aphidicolin inhibits in vivo DNA synthesis in Chinese hamster ovary cells

Using a genetic approach, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells sensitive (aph^S) and resistant (aph^R) to aphidicolin were grown in the presence or absence of various DNA polymerase inhibitors, and the newly synthesized DNA isolated from [³²P]dNMP-labelled, detergent-permeabilized cells, was characterized after fractionation by gel electrophoresis. The particular aph ^Rmutant CHO cell line used was one selected for resistance to aphidicolin and found to possess an altered DNA polymerase of the a-family. The synthesis of a 24 kb replication intermediate was inhibited in wild-type CHO cells grown in the presence of aphidicolin, whereas the synthesis of this replication intermediate was not inhibited by this drug in the mutant CHO cells or in the aphidicolin-resistant somatic cell hybrid progeny constructed by fusion of wild-type and mutant cell lines. Arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C), like aphidicolin, inhibited the synthesis of this 24 kb DNA replication intermediate in the wild-type CHO cells but not in the aph^R mutant cells. However, carbonyldiphosphonate (COMDP) inhibited the synthesis of the 24 kb replication intermediate in both wild-type and mutant cells. N²-(p-n-Butylphenyl)-2 deoxyguanisine-5-triphosphate (BuPdGTP) was found to inhibit the formation of Okazaki fragments equally well in the wild-type and mutant cell lines and thus led to inhibition of synthesis of DNA intermediates in both cases. It appears that aphidicolin and ara-C both affect a common target on the DNA polymerase, which is different from that affected by COMDP in vivo. These data also show that aphidicolin, ara-C and COMDP affect the elongation activity of DNA polymerase but not the initiation activity of the enzyme during DNA replication. This is the first report of such differentiation of the DNA polymerase activities during nuclear DNA replication in mammalian cells. The method of analysis described here for replication intermediates can be used to examine the inhibitory activities of other chemicals on DNA synthesis.     

Exonucleases and the incorporation of aranucleotides into DNA

The polymerization of nucleotide analogs into DNA is a common strategy used to inhibit DNA synthesis in rapidly dividing tumor cells and viruses. The mammalian DNA polymerases catalyze the insertion of the arabinofuranosyl analogs of dNTPs (aranucleotides) into DNA efficiently, but elongate from the 3′ aranucleotides poorly. Slow elongation provides an opportunity for exonucleases to remove aranucleotides. The exonuclease activity associated with DNA polymerase δ removes araCMP from 3′ termini with the same efficiency that it removes a paired 3′ deoxycytosine suggesting that the proofreading exonucleases associated with DNA polymerases might remove aranucleotides inefficiently. A separate 30 kDa exonuclease has been purified from mammalian cells that removes araCMP from 3′ termini. The activity of this enzyme in the cell could remove aranucleotides from 3′ termini of DNA and decrease the efficacy of the analogs. Inhibition analysis of the purified exonuclease shows that this enzyme is inhibited by thioinosine monophosphate (TIMP) with aK _i=17 μM. When high TIMP levels are generated in HL-60 cells, incorporation of araC in DNA is increased about 16-fold relative to total DNA synthesis. This increased araC in DNA is likely a result of exonuclease inhibition in the cell. Thus, exonucleases in cells might play an important role in removing aranucleotides inserted by DNA polymerases.     

Comparison of the kinetic parameters of the truncated catalytic subunit and holoenzyme of human DNA polymerase ɛ

Numerous genetic studies have provided compelling evidence to establish DNA polymerase ɛ (Polɛ) as the primary DNA polymerase responsible for leading strand synthesis during eukaryotic nuclear genome replication. Polɛ is a heterotetramer consisting of a large catalytic subunit that contains the conserved polymerase core domain as well as a 3′ → 5′ exonuclease domain common to many replicative polymerases. In addition, Polɛ possesses three small subunits that lack a known catalytic activity but associate with components involved in a variety of DNA replication and maintenance processes. Previous enzymatic characterization of the Polɛ heterotetramer from budding yeast suggested that the small subunits slightly enhance DNA synthesis by Polɛ in vitro. However, similar studies of the human Polɛ heterotetramer (hPolɛ) have been limited by the difficulty of obtaining hPolɛ in quantities suitable for thorough investigation of its catalytic activity. Utilization of a baculovirus expression system for overexpression and purification of hPolɛ from insect host cells has allowed for isolation of greater amounts of active hPolɛ, thus enabling a more detailed kinetic comparison between hPolɛ and an active N-terminal fragment of the hPolɛ catalytic subunit (p261N), which is readily overexpressed in Escherichia coli. Here, we report the first pre-steady-state studies of fully-assembled hPolɛ. We observe that the small subunits increase DNA binding by hPolɛ relative to p261N, but do not increase processivity during DNA synthesis on a single-stranded M13 template. Interestingly, the 3′ → 5′ exonuclease activity of hPolɛ is reduced relative to p261N on matched and mismatched DNA substrates, indicating that the presence of the small subunits may regulate the proofreading activity of hPolɛ and sway hPolɛ toward DNA synthesis rather than proofreading.     

DNA复制研究步入单分子时代

DNA复制是生命体内必不可少的基本过程之一。传统研究显示DNA复制体中前导链和后随链的合成速度总体来说是一致的,从而避免在新生链中产生明显的单链缺口。主流的观点认为这是由于负责前导链和后随链的两个DNA聚合酶分子之间存在着某种协调同步机制。然而,Kowalczykowski实验室最近采用单分子荧光显微技术实时跟踪发现,大肠杆菌DNA复制体前导链和后随链上两个DNA聚合酶分子互相独立工作,并且都不是匀速行进而是呈现断断续续、时快时慢的随机动态变化。当DNA聚合酶暂停复制时,解旋酶仍会持续解链,导致解旋酶和聚合酶短暂的分离。有意思的是,此时DNA复制体触发一种类似“死人键”(dead-man’s switch)的保险机制,使DNA解旋的速度降低80%,从而恢复解旋酶和聚合酶的偶联。基于单分子水平的实时观察,他们认为前导链和后随链DNA复制进程均遵循一个符合高斯分布的随机模型。这与传统的生化研究观察到两者的合成速度总体来说是一致的并不矛盾。Kowalczykowski实验室的研究实现了从复制开始到结束整个过程对每个单分子行为的连续观测,而传统研究反映的则是经过较长时间对多分子群体平均水平的最终结果进行测定。因此,单分子技术可以极大地弥补传统生化研究的不足。随着未来单分子技术的进步和更广泛的应用,必将把包括DNA复制在内的生物学研究带到一个新的时代。     

DNA polymerase proofreading: Multiple roles maintain genome stability

DNA polymerase proofreading is a spell-checking activity that enables DNA polymerases to remove newly made nucleotide incorporation errors from the primer terminus before further primer extension and also prevents translesion synthesis. DNA polymerase proofreading improves replication fidelity ∼ 100-fold, which is required by many organisms to prevent unacceptably high, life threatening mutation loads. DNA polymerase proofreading has been studied by geneticists and biochemists for > 35 years. A historical perspective and the basic features of DNA polymerase proofreading are described here, but the goal of this review is to present recent advances in the elucidation of the proofreading pathway and to describe roles of DNA polymerase proofreading beyond mismatch correction that are also important for maintaining genome stability.