Downregulation of the T-Cell Receptor by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Nef Does Not Protect against Disease Progression

Chronic immune activation is thought to play a major role in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pathogenesis, but the relative contributions of multiple factors to immune activation are not known. One proposed mechanism to protect against immune activation is the ability of Nef proteins from some HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus strains to downregulate the T-cell receptor (TCR)-CD3 complex of the infected cell, thereby reducing the potential for deleterious activation. HIV type 1 (HIV-1) Nef has lost this property. In contrast to HIV-1, HIV-2 infection is characterized by a marked disparity in the disease course, with most individuals maintaining a normal life span. In this study, we examined the relationship between the ability of HIV-2 Nef proteins to downregulate the TCR and immune activation, comparing progressors and nonprogressors. Representative Nef variants were isolated from 28 HIV-2-infected individuals. We assessed their abilities to downregulate the TCR from the surfaces of CD4 T cells. In the same individuals, the activation of peripheral lymphocytes was evaluated by measurement of the expression levels of HLA-DR and CD38. We observed a striking correlation of the TCR downregulation efficiency of HIV-2 Nef variants with immune activation in individuals with a low viral load. This strongly suggests that Nef expression can influence the activation state of the immune systems of infected individuals. However, the efficiency of TCR downregulation by Nef was not reduced in progressing individuals, showing that TCR downregulation does not protect against progression in HIV-2 infection.The majority of humans infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) progress relentlessly toward immunodeficiency, whereas simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection in the natural hosts, Old World monkeys, rarely causes disease (9). It was recently shown that HIV-1 and its simian ancestor, SIVcpz, have one distinctive characteristic that may contribute to pathogenesis. In contrast to the Nef proteins of other immunodeficiency viruses, HIV-1 and SIVcpz Nef proteins are unable to downregulate the T-cell receptor (TCR) from the surfaces of infected cells (1, 22). Schindler and colleagues proposed that TCR downregulation protects the host from the impact of chronic immune activation (22), which is increasingly thought to play a major role in HIV-1 disease progression (7). In most cases, SIVsmm infection of sooty mangabeys leads to high viral loads without evidence of immunodeficiency or CD4 depletion, and this is associated with very low levels of immune activation (25). CD4 depletion without immunodeficiency has been reported in a minority of SIVsmm-infected sooty mangabeys. However, this CD4 depletion is not associated with major immune activation or viral-load increase (26). Immunodeficiency associated with CD4 depletion was reported in only one case (18). Schindler et al. discovered that in sooty mangabeys showing a loss of CD4⁺ T cells, the Nef protein of the infecting SIVsmm was less efficient at TCR downregulation (22), suggesting that the CD4 depletion in sooty mangabeys is linked to the loss of this function, together with a loss of major histocompatibility complex class I downregulation (23). Following transmission to humans in West Africa, SIVsmm zoonosis gave rise to HIV-2 infection, identified in patients with AIDS in 1986 (10). HIV-2 infection can lead to a clinical picture indistinguishable from AIDS caused by HIV-1, but in general, the progress to clinical immunodeficiency is slower than in HIV-1 infection: this appears to be due to an unusually high proportion of HIV-2-infected long-term nonprogressors (8, 21). Although the few HIV-2 nef alleles that have been studied so far are capable of TCR downregulation, this has not been systematically evaluated in relation to disease progression. Here, we present data from a well-characterized community cohort followed in Caio in Guinea-Bissau since 1989 (27), in which the abilities of nef alleles from the infecting HIV-2 strains to downregulate the TCR could be studied in relation to immune activation and disease status.     

Adult AIDS-Like Disease in a Novel Inducible Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nef Transgenic Mouse Model: CD4+ T-Cell Activation Is Nef Dependent and Can Occur in the Absence of Lymphophenia

CD4C/HIV^nef transgenic (Tg) mice express Nef in CD4⁺ T cells and in the cells of the macrophage/monocyte/dendritic lineage, and they develop an AIDS-like disease similar to human AIDS. In these mice, Nef is constitutively expressed throughout life. To rule out the contribution of any developmental defects caused by early expression of Nef, we generated inducible human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Nef Tg mice by using the tetracycline-inducible system. Faithful expression of the Nef transgene was induced in (CD4C/rtTA × TRE/HIV^Nef) or (CD4C/rtTA2^S-M2 × TRE/HIV^Nef) double-Tg mice upon doxycycline (DOX) treatment in drinking water. Long-term treatment of these mice with DOX also led to loss, apoptosis, and activation of CD4⁺ T cells, this latter phenotype being observed even with low levels of Nef. These phenotypes could be transferred by bone marrow (BM) transplantation, indicating a hematopoietic cell autonomous effect. In addition, in mixed Tg:non-Tg BM chimeras, only Tg and not non-Tg CD4⁺ T cells exhibited an effector/memory phenotype in the absence of lymphopenia. Finally, the DOX-induced double-Tg mice developed nonlymphoid organ diseases similar to those of CD4C/HIV^Nef Tg mice and of humans infected with HIV-1. These results show for the first time that adult mice are susceptible to the detrimental action of Nef and that Nef-mediated T-cell activation can be independent of lymphopenia. These Tg mice represent a unique model which is likely to be instrumental for understanding the cellular and molecular pathways of Nef action as well as the main characteristics of immune reconstitution following DOX withdrawal.Small animal models able to express the entire human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) genome or selected HIV genes have provided useful information on the pathogenesis of AIDS and still represent important research tools toward this goal. Among these models, transgenic (Tg) mice containing intact copies of HIV DNA, defective provirus with the gag and pol genes deleted, or individual HIV-1 genes have been reported to develop various pathologies, some of which resemble those found in human AIDS (2, 3, 8, 9, 16, 17, 18, 24, 27, 29, 30, 38, 44, 45, 46, 49, 51, 52). The cell type context in which the HIV-1 transgene is expressed in these Tg mice appears to play an important role in determining the type of pathological lesions. Tg mice generated in our laboratory and expressing the entire coding sequence of HIV-1 (CD4C/HIV^WT) or HIV-1 Nef alone (CD4C/HIV^Nef) in the relevant target cells of HIV-1, namely, CD4⁺ T cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells, develop pathologies very similar to those in human AIDS (17, 18). The AIDS-like disease of CD4C/HIV^Nef Tg mice is characterized by immunodeficiency, loss of CD4⁺ T cells, thymic atrophy, activation of T cells and pathologies in heart, lungs, and kidneys (18, 53). Similarly, expression of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Nef in Tg mice under the control of the same promoter sequences (CD4C) results in an AIDS-like disease (42). These studies demonstrated that Nef plays an important role in the development of the AIDS-like disease induced by HIV-1 or SIV in Tg mice.Among the AIDS-like phenotypes of these models, the T-cell activation observed by a number of groups in Tg mice expressing Nef (3, 33, 44, 53) may be of special interest for its resemblance to that of humans or macaques infected with HIV-1 or SIV, respectively. HIV infection results in a state of chronic immune activation which correlates very closely with disease progression in humans (11, 14, 23). Similarly, SIV-infected macaques which develop AIDS show aberrant immune activation (35), while SIV-infected sooty mangabey monkeys, natural hosts of SIV, do not develop immunopathologies and do not show immune activation either (41). Various factors may contribute to this immune activation, including increased plasma lipopolysaccharide levels due to microbial translocation from the gut (4), impaired regulatory T cell function (32), or the action of the HIV-1 gene products themselves, such as Env gp120 and Nef (10, 12, 43). Consistent with this latter scenario, we reported that in CD4C/HIV^Nef Tg mice the extent of T-cell activation correlates with levels of Nef expression in CD4⁺ T cells, thus suggesting a direct involvement of Nef in this activation (53). In contrast, Koenen and coworkers reported that T-cell activation in CD2/Nef Tg mice is induced indirectly by lymphophenia (26). In that study, chimeric mice, which were generated from a mixture of non-Tg and Nef Tg bone marrow (BM) cells, were not lymphopenic, and the donor-derived Nef-expressing Tg T cells did not show an activated phenotype. However, the donor Nef Tg T cells constituted only 1 to 2% of peripheral T cells of these chimeric mice (26). Clearly, alternative experimental approaches are needed to study this phenotype in a more physiological context.In the previously described CD4C/HIV^Nef Tg mice (18), Nef expression begins early in life and is constitutively expressed throughout the life of the animal. The AIDS-like disease caused by this early expression of Nef best represents a model for pediatric AIDS. However, in these Tg mice, Nef may interfere with normal developmental processes and these latter defects may contribute to some of the phenotypes observed. To assess the effects of Nef in fully mature adult animals, and thus develop a model of adult AIDS, temporal regulation of Nef expression in adult mice using an inducible system is required.In the present study, we chose the tet-On (rtTA and rtTA2^S-M2) system (13, 15, 25, 48) to induce expression of HIV-1 Nef in CD4⁺ T cells and cells of the macrophage/dendritic lineage of mice using the CD4C tissue-specific regulatory elements. These CD4C sequences were previously used to generate the constitutively Nef-expressing CD4C/HIV^Nef Tg mice (18). These inducible adult (TRE/HIV^Nef × CD4C/rtTA) and (TRE/HIV^Nef × CD4C/rtTA2^S-M2) double-Tg (DTg) mice express Nef when treated with doxycycline (DOX) and develop an AIDS-like disease very similar to that seen in constitutively Nef-expressing CD4C/HIV^Nef Tg mice. We took advantage of this novel biological system to reassess the role of Nef in T-cell activation. Using a mixed chimera made with BM cells from these inducible Nef Tg mice and from non-Tg mice, we could document CD4⁺ T-cell activation only in donor-derived Nef-expressing Tg cells, but not in non-Tg cells, in the absence of lymphopenia. This result strongly suggests that this CD4⁺ T-cell activation phenotype is most likely driven by expression of Nef in these cells.     

Selective Expression of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Nef in Specific Immune Cell Populations of Transgenic Mice Is Associated with Distinct AIDS-Like Phenotypes

We previously reported that CD4C/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)^Nef transgenic (Tg) mice, expressing Nef in CD4⁺ T cells and cells of the macrophage/dendritic cell (DC) lineage, develop a severe AIDS-like disease, characterized by depletion of CD4⁺ T cells, as well as lung, heart, and kidney diseases. In order to determine the contribution of distinct populations of hematopoietic cells to the development of this AIDS-like disease, five additional Tg strains expressing Nef through restricted cell-specific regulatory elements were generated. These Tg strains express Nef in CD4⁺ T cells, DCs, and macrophages (CD4E/HIV^Nef); in CD4⁺ T cells and DCs (mCD4/HIV^Nef and CD4F/HIV^Nef); in macrophages and DCs (CD68/HIV^Nef); or mainly in DCs (CD11c/HIV^Nef). None of these Tg strains developed significant lung and kidney diseases, suggesting the existence of as-yet-unidentified Nef-expressing cell subset(s) that are responsible for inducing organ disease in CD4C/HIV^Nef Tg mice. Mice from all five strains developed persistent oral carriage of Candida albicans, suggesting an impaired immune function. Only strains expressing Nef in CD4⁺ T cells showed CD4⁺ T-cell depletion, activation, and apoptosis. These results demonstrate that expression of Nef in CD4⁺ T cells is the primary determinant of their depletion. Therefore, the pattern of Nef expression in specific cell population(s) largely determines the nature of the resulting pathological changes.The major cell targets and reservoirs for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection in vivo are CD4⁺ T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells (macrophages and dendritic cells [DC]) (21, 24, 51). The cell specificity of these viruses is largely dependent on the expression of CD4 and of its coreceptors, CCR5 and CXCR-4, at the cell surface (29, 66). Infection of these immune cells leads to the severe disease, AIDS, showing widespread manifestations, including progressive immunodeficiency, immune activation, CD4⁺ T-cell depletion, wasting, dementia, nephropathy, heart and lung diseases, and susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens, such as Candida albicans (1, 27, 31, 37, 41, 82, 93, 109). It is reasonable to assume that the various pathological changes in AIDS result from the expression of one or many HIV-1/SIV proteins in these immune target cells. However, assigning the contribution of each infected cell subset to each phenotype has been remarkably difficult, despite evidence that AIDS T-cell phenotypes can present very differently depending on the strains of infecting HIV-1 or SIV or on the cells targeted by the virus (4, 39, 49, 52, 72). For example, the T-cell-tropic X4 HIV strains have long been associated with late events and severe CD4⁺ T-cell depletion (22, 85, 96). However, there are a number of target cell subsets expressing CD4 and CXCR-4, and identifying which one is responsible for this enhanced virulence has not been achieved in vivo. Similarly, the replication of SIV in specific regions of the thymus (cortical versus medullary areas), has been associated with very different outcomes but, unfortunately, the critical target cells of the viruses were not identified either in these studies (60, 80). The task is even more complex, because HIV-1 or SIV can infect several cell subsets within a single cell population. In the thymus, double (CD4⁻ CD8⁻)-negative (DN) or triple (CD3⁻ CD4⁻ CD8⁻)-negative (TN) T cells, as well as double-positive (CD4⁺ CD8⁺) (DP) T cells, are infectible by HIV-1 in vitro (9, 28, 74, 84, 98, 99, 110) and in SCID-hu mice (2, 5, 91, 94). In peripheral organs, gut memory CCR5⁺ CD4⁺ T cells are primarily infected with R5 SIV, SHIV, or HIV, while circulating CD4⁺ T cells can be infected by X4 viruses (13, 42, 49, 69, 70, 100, 101, 104). Moreover, some detrimental effects on CD4⁺ T cells have been postulated to originate from HIV-1/SIV gene expression in bystander cells, such as macrophages or DC, suggesting that other infected target cells may contribute to the loss of CD4⁺ T cells (6, 7, 32, 36, 64, 90).Similarly, the infected cell population(s) required and sufficient to induce the organ diseases associated with HIV-1/SIV expression (brain, heart, and kidney) have not yet all been identified. For lung or kidney disease, HIV-specific cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells (1, 75) or infected podocytes (50, 95), respectively, have been implicated. Activated macrophages have been postulated to play an important role in heart disease (108) and in AIDS dementia (35), although other target cells could be infected by macrophage-tropic viruses and may contribute significantly to the decrease of central nervous system functions (11, 86, 97), as previously pointed out (25).Therefore, because of the widespread nature of HIV-1 infection and the difficulty in extrapolating tropism of HIV-1/SIV in vitro to their cell targeting in vivo (8, 10, 71), alternative approaches are needed to establish the contribution of individual infected cell populations to the multiorgan phenotypes observed in AIDS. To this end, we developed a transgenic (Tg) mouse model of AIDS using a nonreplicating HIV-1 genome expressed through the regulatory sequences of the human CD4 gene (CD4C), in the same murine cells as those targeted by HIV-1 in humans, namely, in immature and mature CD4⁺ T cells, as well as in cells of the macrophage/DC lineages (47, 48, 77; unpublished data). These CD4C/HIV Tg mice develop a multitude of pathologies closely mimicking those of AIDS patients. These include a gradual destruction of the immune system, characterized among other things by thymic and lymphoid organ atrophy, depletion of mature and immature CD4⁺ T lymphocytes, activation of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, susceptibility to mucosal candidiasis, HIV-associated nephropathy, and pulmonary and cardiac complications (26, 43, 44, 57, 76, 77, 79, 106). We demonstrated that Nef is the major determinant of the HIV-1 pathogenicity in CD4C/HIV Tg mice (44). The similarities of the AIDS-like phenotypes of these Tg mice to those in human AIDS strongly suggest that such a Tg mouse approach can be used to investigate the contribution of distinct HIV-1-expressing cell populations to their development.In the present study, we constructed and characterized five additional mouse Tg strains expressing Nef, through distinct regulatory elements, in cell populations more restricted than in CD4C/HIV Tg mice. The aim of this effort was to assess whether, and to what extent, the targeting of Nef in distinct immune cell populations affects disease development and progression.     

Vaccine protection by live, attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus in the absence of high-titer antibody responses and high-frequency cellular immune responses measurable in the periphery

An attenuated derivative of simian immunodeficiency virus strain 239 deleted of V1-V2 sequences in the envelope gene (SIV239ΔV1-V2) was used for vaccine/challenge experiments in rhesus monkeys. Peak levels of viral RNA in plasma of 10⁴ to 10^6.5 copies/ml in the weeks immediately following inoculation of SIV239ΔV1-V2 were 10- to 1,000-fold lower than those observed with parental SIV239 (∼10^7.3 copies/ml). Viral loads consistently remained below 200 copies/ml after 8 weeks of infection by the attenuated SIV239ΔV1-V2 strain. Viral localization experiments revealed large numbers of infected cells within organized lymphoid nodules of the colonic gut-associated lymphoid tissue at 14 days; double-labeling experiments indicated that 93.5% of the virally infected cells at this site were positive for the macrophage marker CD68. Cellular and humoral immune responses measured principally by gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunospot and neutralization assays were variable in the five vaccinated monkeys. One monkey had responses in these assays comparable to or only slightly less than those observed in monkeys infected with parental, wild-type SIV239. Four of the vaccinated monkeys, however, had low, marginal, or undetectable responses in these same assays. These five vaccinated monkeys and three naïve control monkeys were subsequently challenged intravenously with wild-type SIV239. Three of the five vaccinated monkeys, including the one with strong anti-SIV immune responses, were strongly protected against the challenge on the basis of viral load measurements. Surprisingly, two of the vaccinated monkeys were strongly protected against SIV239 challenge despite the presence of cellular anti-SIV responses of low-frequency and low-titer anti-SIV antibody responses. These results indicate that high-titer anti-SIV antibody responses and high-frequency anti-SIV cellular immune responses measurable by standard assays from the peripheral blood are not needed to achieve strong vaccine protection, even against a difficult, neutralization-resistant strain such as SIV239.The characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection suggest major difficulty for the development of a preventive vaccine (19, 23). Pessimism regarding the prospects for a vaccine is derived at least in part from the ability of HIV-1 to continually replicate in the face of apparently strong host immune responses, resistance to antibody-mediated neutralization, and the extensive sequence diversity in field strains of the virus. Lack of knowledge regarding the key components of a protective immune response also remains a major scientific obstacle. Vaccine/challenge experiments with macaque monkeys have been used to evaluate the properties and relative effectiveness of different vaccine approaches and to gauge the formidable nature of these difficulties.One lesson that has been learned from vaccine/challenge experiments with macaque monkeys is the importance of challenge strain on outcome. Vaccinated monkeys that have been challenged with strains of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) with an HIV-1 envelope (SHIV) have almost invariably exhibited strong, long-term protection against disease, irrespective of the nature of the vaccine. Even peptide immunogens have protected against SHIV-induced disease (6, 12, 38). Vaccine approaches that have protected against SHIV challenge include DNA (5, 13), recombinant poxvirus (4), recombinant adenovirus (57), other viral recombinants (18, 55), prime and boost protocols (3, 53, 65), and purified protein (10, 64). Vaccine protection against pathogenic SIV strains such as SIV239, SIV251, and SIV-E660 has been much more difficult to achieve (2, 11, 27, 63). The identical replication-defective gag-recombinant adenovirus that provided strong protection against SHIV challenge (57) provided little or no protection against SIV239 challenge (11). Disappointing levels of protection against SIV have often been observed in the face of apparently robust vaccine-induced immune responses (see, for example, Vogel et al. [63] and Casimiro et al. [11]). Some partial vaccine protections against these SIV strains have been achieved by recombinant poxvirus (7, 50), replication-competent recombinant adenovirus (51), replication-defective adenovirus (66), recombinant poliovirus (15), recombinant Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (18), and recombinant Sendai virus (44).Differences between the biological properties of the SIV strains and those of the SHIV strains used for the above-mentioned studies provide clues as to what may be responsible for the differences in outcome. These SIV strains are difficult to neutralize (26, 34), use CCR5 as a coreceptor for entry into cells (21, 52), and induce a chronic, progressive disease course (17), and this course is independent of the infectious dose (17). The SHIV strains used for the above-mentioned studies are easier to neutralize, use CXCR4 for entry, and induce an acute decline in CD4 counts, and the disease course is dose dependent (29, 30, 48, 54). These SIV strains, like HIV-1 in humans, exhibit a marked preference for CD4⁺ CCR5⁺ memory cells, in contrast to the acutely pathogenic SHIV strains which principally target naïve cells (48).Live, attenuated strains of SIV have provided the strongest vaccine protection by far against SIV challenge. Although clinical use of a live, attenuated HIV vaccine is not being considered, understanding the basis of the strong protection afforded by live, attenuated SIV strains remains an important research objective for the insights that can be provided. Most of the attenuated SIV strains that have been used lack a functional nef gene (16, 31, 58, 67). Shacklett et al. (56) used an attenuated SIV strain with modifications in the gp41 transmembrane protein for protection. Here, we describe strong vaccine protection by a replication-competent SIV strain lacking 100 amino acids from the essential gp120 envelope protein in the absence of overtly robust immune responses.     

A Basic Patch on α-Adaptin Is Required for Binding of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nef and Cooperative Assembly of a CD4-Nef-AP-2 Complex

A critical function of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef protein is the downregulation of CD4 from the surfaces of infected cells. Nef is believed to act by linking the cytosolic tail of CD4 to the endocytic machinery, thereby increasing the rate of CD4 internalization. In support of this model, weak binary interactions between CD4, Nef, and the endocytic adaptor complex, AP-2, have been reported. In particular, dileucine and diacidic motifs in the C-terminal flexible loop of Nef have been shown to mediate binding to a combination of the α and σ2 subunits of AP-2. Here, we report the identification of a potential binding site for the Nef diacidic motif on α-adaptin. This site comprises two basic residues, lysine-297 and arginine-340, on the α-adaptin trunk domain. The mutation of these residues specifically inhibits the ability of Nef to bind AP-2 and downregulate CD4. We also present evidence that the diacidic motif on Nef and the basic patch on α-adaptin are both required for the cooperative assembly of a CD4-Nef-AP-2 complex. This cooperativity explains how Nef is able to efficiently downregulate CD4 despite weak binary interactions between components of the tripartite complex.CD4, a type I transmembrane glycoprotein that serves as a coreceptor for major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) molecules, is expressed on the surfaces of helper T lymphocytes and cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage (8). Primate immunodeficiency viruses gain access to these cells by virtue of the interaction of the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env) with a combination of CD4 and a chemokine receptor (63). This interaction causes a conformational change within the Env protein that promotes the fusion of the viral envelope with the plasma membrane. Upon the delivery of the viral genetic material into the cytoplasm of the host cells, one of the first virally encoded proteins to be expressed is Nef, an accessory factor that modulates specific signal transduction and protein-trafficking pathways in a manner that optimizes the intracellular environment for viral replication (reviewed in references 21, 39, and 65). Perhaps the best characterized function of Nef is the downregulation of CD4 from the surfaces of the host cells (6, 22, 29, 45). CD4 downregulation prevents superinfection (6, 41) and enhances virion release (19, 38, 48, 66, 76), thereby contributing to the establishment of a robust infective state (24, 72).The mechanism used by the Nef protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) to downregulate CD4 has been the subject of extensive study, but only recently have the molecular details of this process begun to be unraveled. It is generally acknowledged that HIV-1 Nef accelerates the internalization of CD4 from the plasma membrane by linking the cytosolic tail of the receptor to the clathrin-associated endocytic machinery (1, 12, 20, 34, 40, 64). In support of this model, a hydrophobic pocket comprising W57 and L58 on the folded core domain of Nef binds with millimolar affinity to the cytosolic tail of CD4 (28) (all residues and numbers correspond to the NL4-3 variant of HIV-1 Nef used in this study). In addition, a dileucine motif (ENTSLL, residues 160 to 165) (10, 16, 26) and a diacidic motif (D174 and D175) (2) on the C-terminal flexible loop of Nef mediate an interaction of micromolar affinity with the clathrin-associated, heterotetrameric (α-β2-μ2-σ2) adaptor protein 2 (AP-2) complex (12, 20, 40, 49). These interactions draw CD4 into clathrin-coated pits that eventually bud inwards as clathrin-coated vesicles (11, 27). Internalized CD4 is subsequently delivered to endosomes and then to lysosomes for degradation (3, 23, 59, 64).Despite progress in the understanding of the mechanism of Nef-induced CD4 downregulation, several important aspects remain to be elucidated. Previous studies have shown that the Nef dileucine and diacidic motifs interact with a combination of the α and σ2 subunits of AP-2 (referred to as the α-σ2 hemicomplex) (12, 20, 40, 49), but the precise location of the Nef binding sites is unknown. It also remains to be determined whether Nef can actually bind CD4 and AP-2 at the same time. Indeed, the formation of a tripartite CD4-Nef-AP-2 complex in which Nef links the cytosolic tail of CD4 to AP-2 has long been hypothesized but has never been demonstrated experimentally. Given the relatively weak affinity of Nef for the CD4 tail (28) and AP-2 (12, 40), it is unclear how such a complex could assemble and function in CD4 downregulation.In this study, we have addressed these issues by using a combination of yeast hybrid, in vitro binding, and in vivo CD4 downregulation assays. We report the identification of a candidate binding site for the Nef diacidic motif on the AP-2 complex. This site, a basic patch comprising K297 and R340 on α-adaptin, is specifically required for Nef binding and Nef-induced CD4 downregulation. We also show that the Nef diacidic motif and the α-adaptin basic patch are required for the cooperative assembly of a tripartite complex composed of the CD4 cytosolic tail, Nef, and the α-σ2 hemicomplex. The cooperative manner in which this complex is formed explains how Nef is able to efficiently downregulate CD4 from the plasma membrane despite weak binary interactions between the components of this complex.     

Ebola Virus Glycoprotein Counteracts BST-2/Tetherin Restriction in a Sequence-Independent Manner That Does Not Require Tetherin Surface Removal

BST-2/tetherin is an interferon-inducible protein that restricts the release of enveloped viruses from the surface of infected cells by physically linking viral and cellular membranes. It is present at both the cell surface and in a perinuclear region, and viral anti-tetherin factors including HIV-1 Vpu and HIV-2 Env have been shown to decrease the cell surface population. To map the domains of human tetherin necessary for both virus restriction and sensitivity to viral anti-tetherin factors, we constructed a series of tetherin derivatives and assayed their activity. We found that the cytoplasmic tail (CT) and transmembrane (TM) domains of tetherin alone produced its characteristic cellular distribution, while the ectodomain of the protein, which includes a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, was sufficient to restrict virus release when presented by the CT/TM regions of a different type II membrane protein. To counteract tetherin restriction and remove it from the cell surface, HIV-1 Vpu required the specific sequence present in the TM domain of human tetherin. In contrast, the HIV-2 Env required only the ectodomain of the protein and was sensitive to a point mutation in this region. Strikingly, the anti-tetherin factor, Ebola virus GP, was able to overcome restriction conferred by both tetherin and a series of functional tetherin derivatives, including a wholly artificial tetherin molecule. Moreover, GP overcame restriction without significantly removing tetherin from the cell surface. These findings suggest that Ebola virus GP uses a novel mechanism to circumvent tetherin restriction.Pathogenic viruses often have evolved mechanisms to neutralize host defenses that act at the cellular level to interfere with the virus life cycle. Such cellular restriction factors have been most extensively characterized for HIV-1 (38) and include the interferon-inducible membrane protein BST-2/HM1.24/CD317/tetherin (28, 40). If unchecked, tetherin blocks the release of newly formed HIV-1 particles from cells by physically tethering them at the cell surface (7, 28, 32, 40). In addition, tetherin has been shown to act against a broad range of enveloped viral particles, including retroviruses, filoviruses, arenaviruses, and herpesviruses (17, 18, 23, 35). In turn, certain viruses that are targeted by tetherin appear to have evolved counteracting activities, and anti-tetherin factors so far identified include HIV-1 Vpu; HIV-2 Env; simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Nef, Vpu, and Env proteins; Ebola virus GP; and Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) K5 (11, 16, 18, 20, 23, 28, 36, 40, 44, 45).Tetherin is a homodimeric type II integral membrane protein containing an N-terminal cytoplasmic tail (CT), a single-pass transmembrane domain (TM), an ectodomain-containing predicted coiled-coil regions, two glycoslyation sites, three conserved cysteines, and a C-terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (2, 19, 31). This unusual topology, with two independent membrane anchors, has led to the suggestion that the retention of virions at the cell surface arises from tetherin''s ability to be inserted simultaneously in both host and viral membranes (28, 32, 41) or, alternatively, that dimers or higher-order complexes of tetherin conferred by the ectodomain mediate this effect (39). Interestingly, an artificial tetherin containing the same structural features as the native protein but constructed from unrelated sequences was able to restrict both HIV-1 and Ebola virus particles (32). This suggests that the viral lipid envelope is the target of tetherin and provides an explanation for tetherin''s broad activity against diverse enveloped viruses.A fraction of tetherin is present at the plasma membrane of cells (9, 14), and it has been proposed that viral anti-tetherin factors function by removing this cell surface fraction (40). This now has been shown to occur in the presence of HIV-1 Vpu (5, 7, 15, 26, 34, 40, 44), HIV-2 Env (5, 20), SIV Env (11), SIV Nef (15), and KSHV K5 (3, 23). In addition, certain anti-tetherin factors also may promote the degradation of tetherin, as has been observed for both HIV-1 Vpu (3, 5, 7, 10, 22, 26, 27) and KSHV K5 (3, 23), although Vpu also appears able to block tetherin restriction in the absence of degradation (8), and no effects on tetherin steady-state levels have been observed in the presence of either the HIV-2 or SIVtan Env (11, 20). Simply keeping tetherin away from the cell surface, or targeting it for degradation, may not be the only mechanism used by anti-tetherin factors, since it also has been reported that Vpu does not affect the levels of surface tetherin or its total cellular levels in certain T-cell lines (27).The interactions between tetherin and viral anti-tetherin factors show evidence of species specificity, suggesting ongoing evolution between viruses and their hosts. HIV-1 Vpu is active against human and chimpanzee tetherin but not other primate tetherins (10, 25, 34, 36, 44, 45), while SIV Nef proteins are active against primate but not human tetherins (16, 36, 44, 45). This suggests that, unlike tetherin restriction, the action of the anti-tetherin factors may involve specific sequence interactions. Indeed, the TM domain has been recognized as a target for HIV-1 Vpu (10, 15, 16, 25, 34), while a single point mutation introduced into the extracellular domain of human tetherin can block its antagonism by the SIVtan Env (11).In the present study, we investigated the roles of the different domains of tetherin in both promoting virus restriction and conferring susceptibility to the anti-tetherin factors encoded by HIV-1, HIV-2, and Ebola virus. We confirmed that tetherin restriction can be conferred by proteins that retain the two distinct membrane anchors, while signals for the cellular localization of the protein reside in the CT/TM domains of the protein. We found that the Vpu protein targets the TM domain of tetherin, while the HIV-2 Env targets the ectodomain of the protein. In contrast, the Ebola virus GP appears to use a non-sequence-specific mechanism to counteract tetherin restriction, since even an artificial tetherin could be successfully overcome by GP expression. Interestingly, Ebola virus GP counteracted tetherin restriction without removing the protein from the cell surface, suggesting that it is possible to overcome this restriction by mechanisms other than blocking tetherin''s cell surface expression.     

Nef-Induced CD4 Endocytosis in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Host Cells: Role of p56lck Kinase

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Nef interferes with the endocytic machinery to modulate the cell surface expression of CD4. However, the basal trafficking of CD4 is governed by different rules in the target cells of HIV-1: whereas CD4 is rapidly internalized from the cell surface in myeloid cells, CD4 is stabilized at the plasma membrane through its interaction with the p56^lck kinase in lymphoid cells. In this study, we showed that Nef was able to downregulate CD4 in both lymphoid and myeloid cell lines but that an increase in the internalization rate of CD4 could be observed only in lymphoid cells. Expression of p56^lck in nonlymphoid CD4-expressing cells restores the ability of Nef in order to increase the internalization rate of CD4. Concurrent with this observation, the expression of a p56^lck-binding-deficient mutant of CD4 in lymphoid cells abrogates the Nef-induced acceleration of CD4 internalization. We also show that the expression of Nef causes a decrease in the association of p56^lck with cell surface-expressed CD4. Regardless of the presence of p56^lck, the downregulation of CD4 by Nef was followed by CD4 degradation. Our results imply that Nef uses distinct mechanisms to downregulate the cell surface expression levels of CD4 in either lymphoid or myeloid target cells of HIV-1.Besides proteins that are essential for proper virus processing and assembly, the genomes of primate lentiviruses such as human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) encode auxiliary proteins that modulate viral infectivity. The 27-kDa auxiliary protein Nef is a key element in the progression of primary HIV-1 infection toward AIDS. Cases of patients infected with HIV-1 strains harboring a deletion in the nef gene or a defective nef allele have been reported. Some of these patients exhibit asymptomatic or slow progression toward the disease (6, 17, 37). In vitro, Nef facilitates viral replication and enhances the infectivity of viral particles (13, 47, 69). The mechanisms involved in the Nef-induced increase of viral infectivity remain elusive; however, it is a multifactorial process related to the ability of Nef to alter the trafficking of host cell proteins.Indeed, the most documented effect of Nef during the course of viral infection is its ability to disturb the clathrin-dependent trafficking machinery involved in the transport of transmembrane proteins through endosomal compartments. This leads to the modulation of the level of cell surface expression for some receptors, including CD4, which is the primary receptor of HIV-1 (35) and major histocompatibility complex class I (reviewed in references 22 and 27). The downregulation of CD4, which results in the impairment of the immunological synapse (72) and the downregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules (reviewed in reference 16), is believed to contribute to the escape of HIV-1-infected cells from immunosurveillance. Moreover, the downregulation of CD4 helps avoid superinfection of cells, which would be deleterious to the virus (reviewed in reference 21), and has a direct impact on viral fitness by allowing better incorporation of the functional envelope in viral particles produced from CD4-expressing cells (3, 36, 53).Nef-induced cell surface downregulation of CD4 is efficient in all CD4-expressing cells and depends on the integrity of a di-Leu motif at position 164/165 of the C-terminal flexible loop of HIV-1 Nef (2, 9, 25). This di-Leu motif allows for the interaction with clathrin-associated adaptor protein (AP) complexes that participate in the clathrin-dependent vesicular transport within the endocytic pathway. The AP type 2 (AP-2) complex is localized at the plasma membrane and is essential to the assembly and function of clathrin-coated pits involved in the internalization of receptors from the cell surface (59). The interaction of Nef with AP-2 is well delineated and has been proposed to enhance the targeting of CD4 to clathrin-coated pits and its internalization (10, 12, 26, 32, 39).Helper T lymphocytes are the predominant cell type that expresses CD4; however, CD4 is also present at the surfaces of monocytes and macrophages (70), where its function is yet to be elucidated. Whereas cell surface CD4 is rapidly internalized in myeloid cells, CD4 is stabilized at the plasma membrane in lymphoid cells through its interaction with the Src family protein tyrosine kinase p56^lck. Cys residues located at positions 420/422 in the CD4 cytoplasmic tail are essential to the constitutive association with p56^lck (73). Besides its role in signal transduction, this interaction also correlates with an accumulation of CD4 in lipid rafts and enhanced exclusion of CD4 from clathrin-coated pits (50).In T cells, treatment with phorbol esters such as phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) provokes the phosphorylation of Ser residues found in the cytoplasmic tail of CD4. This correlates with a decreased association of p56^lck with CD4 and the internalization of the receptor (24, 32-34, 41, 45, 48, 52, 56, 61, 66-68). Nef-induced CD4 downregulation is known to be independent of Ser phosphorylation (20) and is therefore governed by mechanisms different from those involved in PMA-induced CD4 downregulation. However, the Leu-based sorting motif in the CD4 cytoplasmic tail is critical for both PMA and Nef-induced CD4 downregulation (2, 5, 24, 31, 56, 60, 68), thus indicating that despite being different, the mechanisms involved in Nef- and PMA-induced CD4 downregulation partially overlap.In the present study, we investigated whether the mechanisms used by Nef to downregulate CD4 are cell type-dependent processes. We looked at the trafficking and steady-state expression of CD4 in the main target cells of HIV-1, CD4-positive T lymphocytes, and cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage. Our results demonstrate that the presence of p56^lck has a direct impact on the mechanisms used by Nef to downregulate CD4 from the cell surface of T lymphocytes. They also reveal that Nef uses distinct pathways to decrease levels of cell surface expression of CD4 in lymphoid or myeloid target cells of HIV-1.     

HIV-1 Nef Inhibits Ruffles,Induces Filopodia,and Modulates Migration of Infected Lymphocytes

The HIV-1 Nef protein is a pathogenic factor modulating the behavior of infected cells. Nef induces actin cytoskeleton changes and impairs cell migration toward chemokines. We further characterized the morphology, cytoskeleton dynamics, and motility of HIV-1-infected lymphocytes. By using scanning electron microscopy, confocal immunofluorescence microscopy, and ImageStream technology, which combines flow cytometry and automated imaging, we report that HIV-1 induces a characteristic remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton. In infected lymphocytes, ruffle formation is inhibited, whereas long, thin filopodium-like protrusions are induced. Cells infected with HIV with nef deleted display a normal phenotype, and Nef expression alone, in the absence of other viral proteins, induces morphological changes. We also used an innovative imaging system to immobilize and visualize living individual cells in suspension. When combined with confocal “axial tomography,” this technique greatly enhances three-dimensional optical resolution. With this technique, we confirmed the induction of long filopodium-like structures in unfixed Nef-expressing lymphocytes. The cytoskeleton reorganization induced by Nef is associated with an important impairment of cell movements. The adhesion and spreading of infected cells to fibronectin, their spontaneous motility, and their migration toward chemokines (CXCL12, CCL3, and CCL19) were all significantly decreased. Therefore, Nef induces complex effects on the lymphocyte actin cytoskeleton and cellular morphology, which likely impacts the capacity of infected cells to circulate and to encounter and communicate with bystander cells.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) mostly replicates in T-cell areas of secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs) and induces pathological changes in their architecture. Such changes are likely due to a combination of events, including destruction of T cells, chronic immune activation, and alteration of T-cell motility toward and inside the SLOs (27, 37, 50, 53). Indeed, to fulfill their immune surveillance role, T cells continuously circulate in and out of blood, lymph nodes (LNs), and tissues (60).Lymphocyte recruitment from the bloodstream into LNs depends on three distinct processes, i.e., attachment to high endothelial venules (HEVs), extravasation, and cell migration (10, 60). Adhesion to the endothelium and extracellular matrix (ECM) is a crucial step, regulated in part by β1 integrins, α4β1 (VLA-4) and α5β1, that bind VCAM-1 and/or fibronectin (56). Chemokines and their Gαi-protein-coupled receptors are key regulators of lymphocyte trafficking (32). For instance, CCL19 and CCL21 are constitutively produced by HEVs and by fibroblastic reticular cells of T-cell areas of LNs (21, 28, 29). These two chemokines share the receptor CCR7, expressed by naïve T cells and a fraction of memory T cells (47). They play a major role in lymphocyte homing to LNs, in steady state as well as under conditions of inflammation, and may control T-cell positioning within defined functional compartments (1, 17, 18, 47). CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12/SDF-1 also contribute to T-cell entry into LNs (5, 23, 40). In addition, effector and memory T cells express a broad range of receptors binding inflammatory chemokines, such as the CCR5 ligands CCL3 (MIP1α), CCL4 (MIP1β), and CCL5 (Rantes).Efficient accomplishment of lymphocyte migration and immune functions requires tight regulation of the cellular cytoskeleton (59). This is mediated by the small GTPases of the Rho subfamily, such as Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 (11, 58). They activate specific actin filament assembly factors to generate sheet-like protrusive structures (such as lamellipodia and ruffles) and finger-like protrusions (such as filopodia and microvilli) (6). These structures have different functions. Lamellipodia and ruffles are formed during crawling cell motility and spreading. Filopodia protrude from the leading edges of many motile cells. They appear to perform sensory and exploratory functions to steer cells, depending on cues from the environment (42). Moreover, filopodia, or other thin structures called tunneling nanotubes, have been shown to form intercellular bridges, allowing viruses to spread through remote contacts between infected cells and targets (44, 48, 49, 52).HIV-1 hijacks cytoskeleton dynamics in order to ensure viral entry and transport within and egress from target cells (34; reviewed in reference 13). In particular, the viral protein Nef modifies actin remodeling in various cell systems. In T cells, Nef alters actin rearrangements triggered by activation of T-cell (TCR) or chemokine receptors (22, 54). Nef inhibits immunological synapse formation, a dynamic process involving rapid actin modifications (57). Nef also affects plasma membrane plasticity, inducing secretion of microvesicle clusters (33). In macrophages, Nef induces the extension of long intercellular conduits allowing its own transfer to B cells (61). A number of studies have reported that Nef affects T-cell chemotaxis (generally to CXCL12) through the modulation of Rho-GTPase-regulated signaling pathways (7, 24, 39, 54). Migration studies have generally been performed using Nef-expressing cells, and rarely in the context of HIV-1 infection (54). From a molecular standpoint, it has recently been proposed that Nef acts in part by deregulating cofilin, an actin-depolymerizing factor that promotes actin turnover and subsequent cell motility (54).In the present study, our goal was to gain further insights into the effect of HIV-1 infection on cytoskeleton dynamics. We used a panel of innovative techniques allowing analysis of cell shape, adhesion, and motility. We report that in HIV-infected lymphocytes, Nef promotes filopodium-like formation while it inhibits membrane ruffling. Nef impairs cell adhesion on the extracellular matrix and decreases intrinsic cell motility. Lymphocyte migration toward various chemokines (CXCL12, CCL3, and CCL19) is also inhibited. Our results suggest that Nef may facilitate viral spread and contribute to AIDS pathogenesis by manipulating the migration of lymphocytes.     

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nef Protein Targets CD4 to the Multivesicular Body Pathway

The Nef protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 downregulates the CD4 coreceptor from the surface of host cells by accelerating the rate of CD4 endocytosis through a clathrin/AP-2 pathway. Herein, we report that Nef has the additional function of targeting CD4 to the multivesicular body (MVB) pathway for eventual delivery to lysosomes. This targeting involves the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery. Perturbation of this machinery does not prevent removal of CD4 from the cell surface but precludes its lysosomal degradation, indicating that accelerated endocytosis and targeting to the MVB pathway are separate functions of Nef. We also show that both CD4 and Nef are ubiquitinated on lysine residues, but this modification is dispensable for Nef-induced targeting of CD4 to the MVB pathway.Primate immunodeficiency viruses infect helper T lymphocytes and cells of the macrophage/monocyte lineage by binding of their viral envelope glycoprotein, Env, to a combination of two host cell-specific surface proteins, CD4 and either the CCR5 or CXCR4 chemokine receptors (reviewed in reference 62). Ensuing fusion of the viral envelope with the host cell plasma membrane delivers the viral genetic material into the cytoplasm. Remarkably, the most highly transcribed viral gene in the early phase of infection does not encode an enzyme or structural protein but an accessory protein named Nef. Early expression of Nef is thought to reprogram the host cell for optimal replication of the virus. Indeed, Nef has been shown to enhance virus production (19, 24, 59, 74) and to promote progression to AIDS (23, 47, 48), making it an attractive candidate for pharmacologic intervention.Nef is an N-terminally myristoylated protein with a molecular mass of 27 kDa for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and 35 kDa for HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus (27, 29, 50, 65). Nef has been ascribed many functions, the best characterized of which is the downregulation of the CD4 coreceptor from the surface of infected cells (28, 35, 57). CD4 downregulation is believed to prevent superinfection (8, 52) and to preclude the cellular retention of newly synthesized Env (8, 49), thus allowing the establishment of a robust infection (30, 71).The molecular mechanism by which Nef downregulates CD4 has been extensively studied. A consensus has emerged that Nef accelerates the endocytosis of cell surface CD4 (2, 64) by linking the cytosolic tail of CD4 to the heterotetrameric (α-β2-μ2-σ2) adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) complex (17, 25, 34, 45, 67). Determinants in the CD4 tail bind to a hydrophobic pocket comprising tryptophan-57 and leucine-58 on the folded core domain of Nef (34). On the other hand, a dileucine motif (i.e., ENTSLL, residues 160 to 165) (14, 22, 32) and a diacidic motif (i.e., DD, residues 174 and 175) (3) (residues correspond to the NL4-3 clone of HIV-1) within a C-terminal, flexible loop of Nef bind to the α and σ2 subunits of AP-2 (17, 18, 25, 51). AP-2, in turn, binds to clathrin, leading to the concentration of CD4 within clathrin-coated pits (15, 33). These pits eventually bud from the plasma membrane as clathrin-coated vesicles that deliver internalized CD4 to endosomes. In essence, then, Nef acts as a connector that confers on CD4 the ability to be rapidly internalized in a manner similar to endocytic receptors (75).Unlike typical endocytic recycling receptors like the transferrin receptor or the low-density lipoprotein receptor, however, CD4 that is forcibly internalized by Nef does not return to the cell surface but is delivered to lysosomes for degradation (4, 64, 68). Thus, expression of Nef decreases both the surface and total levels of CD4. What keeps internalized CD4 from returning to the plasma membrane? We hypothesized that Nef might additionally act on endosomes to direct CD4 to lysosomes. This is precisely the fate followed by signaling receptors, transporters, and other transmembrane proteins that undergo ubiquitination-mediated internalization and targeting to the multivesicular body (MVB) pathway (40, 46). This targeting involves the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), including the ESCRT-0, -I, -II, and -III complexes, which function to sort ubiquitinated cargoes into intraluminal vesicles of MVBs for eventual degradation in lysosomes (40, 46). Herein, we show that Nef indeed plays a novel role in targeting internalized CD4 from endosomes to the MVB pathway in an ESCRT-dependent manner. We also show that both Nef and CD4 undergo ubiquitination on lysine residues, but, strikingly, this modification is not required for CD4 targeting to the MVB pathway.     

Antagonism to and Intracellular Sequestration of Human Tetherin by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Envelope Glycoprotein

Tetherin (CD317/BST-2), an interferon-induced membrane protein, restricts the release of nascent retroviral particles from infected cell surfaces. While human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) encodes the accessory gene vpu to overcome the action of tetherin, the lineage of primate lentiviruses that gave rise to HIV-2 does not. It has been previously reported that the HIV-2 envelope glycoprotein has a Vpu-like function in promoting virus release. Here we demonstrate that the HIV-2 Rod envelope glycoprotein (HIV-2 Rod Env) is a tetherin antagonist. Expression of HIV-2 Rod Env, but not that of HIV-1 or the closely related simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) SIVmac1A11, counteracts tetherin-mediated restriction of Vpu-defective HIV-1 in a cell-type-specific manner. This correlates with the ability of the HIV-2 Rod Env to mediate cell surface downregulation of tetherin. Antagonism requires an endocytic motif conserved across HIV/SIV lineages in the gp41 cytoplasmic tail, but specificity for tetherin is governed by extracellular determinants in the mature Env protein. Coimmunoprecipitation studies suggest an interaction between HIV-2 Rod Env and tetherin, but unlike studies with Vpu, we found no evidence of tetherin degradation. In the presence of HIV-2 Rod Env, tetherin localization is restricted to the trans-Golgi network, suggesting Env-mediated effects on tetherin trafficking sequester it from virus assembly sites on the plasma membrane. Finally, we recapitulated these observations in HIV-2-infected CD4⁺ T-cell lines, demonstrating that tetherin antagonism and sequestration occur at physiological levels of Env expression during virus replication.Various stages of the replication cycle of primate lentiviruses can be targeted by host antiviral restriction factors (reviewed in reference 49). In addition to the well-characterized antiviral effects of members of the APOBEC3 family of cytidine deaminases, particularly APOBEC3G and -3F, and species-specific variants of tripartite motif family 5α, the release of nascent retroviral particles has recently been shown to be a target for a novel restriction factor, tetherin (CD317/bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 [BST-2]) (31, 46). Tetherin is an interferon-inducible gene that was originally shown to impart a restriction on the release of mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that lack a vpu gene (31, 46). In tetherin-positive cells, mature Vpu-defective HIV-1 particles are retained on the cell surface, linked to the plasma membrane (PM) and each other via protease-sensitive tethers, and can be subsequently endocytosed and accumulate in late endosomes (30, 31). Tetherin is not HIV specific and restricts the release of virus-like particles derived from all retroviruses tested (18), as well as those of filoviruses and arenaviruses (18, 19, 39).Tetherin is a small (181-amino-acid) type II membrane protein with an unusual topology that exists mainly as a disulfide-linked dimer (34). It consists of an N-terminal cytoplasmic tail, a transmembrane anchor, an extracellular domain that includes three cysteine residues important for dimerization, a putative coiled-coil, and finally a glycophosphatidyinosityl-linked lipid anchor (22) that is essential for restriction (31). Tetherin localizes to retroviral assembly sites on the PM (18, 31), and this unusual structure is highly suggestive that tetherin restricts virion release by incorporation into the viral membrane and cross-linking virions to cells. Such a mechanism would make tetherin a powerful antiviral effector that can target an obligate part of most, if not all, enveloped virus assembly strategies. Moreover, since tetherin restriction has no specific requirement for virus protein sequences, to avoid its action, mammalian viruses have evolved to encode several distinct countermeasures that specifically inhibit tetherin''s antiviral function.The Vpu accessory protein antagonizes tetherin-mediated restriction of HIV-1 (31, 46). In the presence of Vpu, tetherin is downregulated from the cell surface (2, 46) and is targeted for degradation (10, 13, 14), although whether these processes are required for antagonism of tetherin function is unclear (27). HIV-1 Vpu displays a distinct species specificity in that it is unable to target tetherin orthologues from rhesus macaques or African green monkeys (14, 25). This differential sensitivity maps to the tetherin transmembrane domain, particularly residues that are predicted to have been under high positive selection pressure during primate evolution (14, 16, 25). This suggests that tetherin evolution may have been driven in part by viral countermeasures like Vpu. Vpu, however, is only encoded by HIV-1 and its direct simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) lineage precursors. The majority of SIVs, including the SIVsm, the progenitor of both HIV-2 and SIVmac, do not encode a Vpu protein (21). In some of these SIVs, tetherin antagonism was recently shown to map to the nef gene (16, 51). SIV Nef proteins, however, are generally ineffective against human tetherin because they target a (G/D)DIWK motif that was deleted from the human tetherin cytoplasmic tail sometime after the divergence of humans and chimpanzees (51). This raises the question of how HIV-2 is able to overcome human tetherin, as recent data show chronically HIV-2-infected CEM T cells have reduced tetherin levels on their surface (10).Interestingly, it has long been known that the envelope glycoprotein of certain HIV-2 isolates can stimulate the release of Vpu-defective HIV-1 virions from cells we now know to be tetherin positive (5, 6, 43). HIV and SIV Envs form trimeric spikes of dimers of the surface subunit (SU-gp105 in HIV-2/SIVmac and gp120 in HIV-1) that bind CD4 and the chemokine coreceptor and gp41 (the transmembrane [TM] subunit that facilitates fusion with and entry into the target cell). Envelope precursors (gp140 or gp160) are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum, where they become glycosylated and are exported to the surface via the secretory pathway (8). During transit through the Golgi apparatus and possibly in endosomal compartments, the immature precursors are cleaved by furin-like proteases to form mature spikes (15, 29). Multiple endocytosis motifs in the gp41 cytoplasmic tail lead to only minor quantities of Env being exposed at the cell surface at any given time (7, 40). Recent data demonstrated that the conserved GYxxθ motif, a binding site for the clathrin adaptor protein AP-2 (3), in the membrane-proximal region of HIV-2 gp41 is required to promote Vpu-defective HIV-1 release from HeLa cells (1, 32). Based on experiments with HIV-1/HIV-2 chimeric envelopes, an additional requirement in the extracellular component was suggested (1). In this study we set out to examine the Vpu-like activity of HIV-2 envelope in light of the discovery of tetherin. We demonstrate that the HIV-2 Env is a tetherin antagonist, and we provide mechanistic insight into the basis of this antagonism.     

Transitions to and from the CD4-Bound Conformation Are Modulated by a Single-Residue Change in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp120 Inner Domain

Binding to the primary receptor CD4 induces conformational changes in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gp120 envelope glycoprotein that allow binding to the coreceptor (CCR5 or CXCR4) and ultimately trigger viral membrane-cell membrane fusion mediated by the gp41 transmembrane envelope glycoprotein. Here we report the derivation of an HIV-1 gp120 variant, H66N, that confers envelope glycoprotein resistance to temperature extremes. The H66N change decreases the spontaneous sampling of the CD4-bound conformation by the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins, thus diminishing CD4-independent infection. The H66N change also stabilizes the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein complex once the CD4-bound state is achieved, decreasing the probability of CD4-induced inactivation and revealing the enhancing effects of soluble CD4 binding on HIV-1 infection. In the CD4-bound conformation, the highly conserved histidine 66 is located between the receptor-binding and gp41-interactive surfaces of gp120. Thus, a single amino acid change in this strategically positioned gp120 inner domain residue influences the propensity of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins to negotiate conformational transitions to and from the CD4-bound state.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the cause of AIDS (6, 29, 66), infects target cells by direct fusion of the viral and target cell membranes. The viral fusion complex is composed of gp120 and gp41 envelope glycoproteins, which are organized into trimeric spikes on the surface of the virus (10, 51, 89). Membrane fusion is initiated by direct binding of gp120 to the CD4 receptor on target cells (17, 41, 53). CD4 binding creates a second binding site on gp120 for the chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4, which serve as coreceptors (3, 12, 19, 23, 25). Coreceptor binding is thought to lead to further conformational changes in the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins that facilitate the fusion of viral and cell membranes. The formation of an energetically stable six-helix bundle by the gp41 ectodomain contributes to the membrane fusion event (9, 10, 79, 89, 90).The energy required for viral membrane-cell membrane fusion derives from the sequential transitions that the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins undergo, from the high-energy unliganded state to the low-energy six-helix bundle. The graded transitions down this energetic slope are initially triggered by CD4 binding (17). The interaction of HIV-1 gp120 with CD4 is accompanied by an unusually large change in entropy, which is thought to indicate the introduction of order into the conformationally flexible unliganded gp120 glycoprotein (61). In the CD4-bound state, gp120 is capable of binding CCR5 with high affinity; moreover, CD4 binding alters the quaternary structure of the envelope glycoprotein complex, resulting in the exposure of gp41 ectodomain segments (27, 45, 77, 92). The stability of the intermediate state induced by CD4 binding depends upon several variables, including the virus (HIV-1 versus HIV-2/simian immunodeficiency virus [SIV]), the temperature, and the nature of the CD4 ligand (CD4 on a target cell membrane versus soluble forms of CD4 [sCD4]) (30, 73). For HIV-1 exposed to sCD4, if CCR5 binding occurs within a given period of time, progression along the entry pathway continues. If CCR5 binding is impeded or delayed, the CD4-bound envelope glycoprotein complex decays into inactive states (30). In extreme cases, the binding of sCD4 to the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins induces the shedding of gp120 from the envelope glycoprotein trimer (31, 56, 58). Thus, sCD4 generally inhibits HIV-1 infection by triggering inactivation events, in addition to competing with CD4 anchored in the target cell membrane (63).HIV-1 isolates vary in sensitivity to sCD4, due in some cases to a low affinity of the envelope glycoprotein trimer for CD4 and in other cases to differences in propensity to undergo inactivating conformational transitions following CD4 binding (30). HIV-1 isolates that have been passaged extensively in T-cell lines (the tissue culture laboratory-adapted [TCLA] isolates) exhibit lower requirements for CD4 than primary HIV-1 isolates (16, 63, 82). TCLA viruses bind sCD4 efficiently and are generally sensitive to neutralization compared with primary HIV-1 isolates. Differences in sCD4 sensitivity between primary and TCLA HIV-1 strains have been mapped to the major variable loops (V1/V2 and V3) of the gp120 glycoprotein (34, 42, 62, 81). Sensitivity to sCD4 has been shown to be independent of envelope glycoprotein spike density or the intrinsic stability of the envelope glycoprotein complex (30, 35).In general, HIV-1 isolates are more sensitive to sCD4 neutralization than HIV-2 or SIV isolates (4, 14, 73). The relative resistance of SIV to sCD4 neutralization can in some cases be explained by a reduced affinity of the envelope glycoprotein trimer for sCD4 (57); however, at least some SIV isolates exhibit sCD4-induced activation of entry into CD4-negative, CCR5-expressing target cells that lasts for several hours after exposure to sCD4 (73). Thus, for some primate immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoproteins, activated intermediates in the CD4-bound conformation can be quite stable.The HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein elements important for receptor binding, subunit interaction, and membrane fusion are well conserved among different viral strains (71, 91). Thus, these elements represent potential targets for inhibitors of HIV-1 entry. Understanding the structure and longevity of the envelope glycoprotein intermediates along the virus entry pathway is relevant to attempts at inhibition. For example, peptides that target the heptad repeat 1 region of gp41 exhibit major differences in potency against HIV-1 strains related to efficiency of chemokine receptor binding (20, 21), which is thought to promote the conformational transition to the next step in the virus entry cascade. The determinants of the duration of exposure of targetable HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein elements during the entry process are undefined.To study envelope glycoprotein determinants of the movement among the distinct conformational states along the HIV-1 entry pathway, we attempted to generate HIV-1 variants that exhibit improved stability. Historically, labile viral elements have been stabilized by selecting virus to replicate under conditions, such as high temperature, that typically weaken protein-protein interactions (38, 39, 76, 102). Thus, we subjected HIV-1 to repeated incubations at temperatures between 42°C and 56°C, followed by expansion and analysis of the remaining replication-competent virus fraction. In this manner, we identified an envelope glycoprotein variant, H66N, in which histidine 66 in the gp120 N-terminal segment was altered to asparagine. The resistance of HIV-1 bearing the H66N envelope glycoproteins to changes in temperature has been reported elsewhere (37). Here, we examine the effect of the H66N change on the ability of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins to negotiate conformational transitions, either spontaneously or in the presence of sCD4. The H66N phenotype was studied in the context of both CD4-dependent and CD4-independent HIV-1 variants.     

Envelope Vaccination Shapes Viral Envelope Evolution following Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Rhesus Monkeys

The evolution of envelope mutations by replicating primate immunodeficiency viruses allows these viruses to escape from the immune pressure mediated by neutralizing antibodies. Vaccine-induced anti-envelope antibody responses may accelerate and/or alter the specificity of the antibodies, thus shaping the evolution of envelope mutations in the replicating virus. To explore this possibility, we studied the neutralizing antibody response and the envelope sequences in rhesus monkeys vaccinated with either gag-pol-nef immunogens or gag-pol-nef immunogens in combination with env and then infected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). Using a pseudovirion neutralization assay, we demonstrate that envelope vaccination primed for an accelerated neutralizing antibody response following virus challenge. To monitor viral envelope evolution in these two cohorts of monkeys, full-length envelopes from plasma virus isolated at weeks 37 and 62 postchallenge were sequenced by single genome amplification to identify sites of envelope mutations. We show that env vaccination was associated with a change in the pattern of envelope mutations. Prevalent mutations in sequences from gag-pol-nef vaccinees included deletions in both variable regions 1 and 4 (V1 and V4), whereas deletions in the env vaccinees occurred only in V1. These data show that env vaccination altered the focus of the antibody-mediated selection pressure on the evolution of envelope following SIV challenge.Immune containment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) is complicated by the continuous genetic evolution of the virus. The evolution of the HIV-1 envelope is shaped, in part, by selective pressure of neutralizing antibodies (6, 12, 27, 34-36, 40). Changes in envelope sequence and glycosylation patterns following infection can allow the virus to escape neutralization. If the rate and extent of envelope sequence evolution following infection can be decreased, immune containment of HIV-1 may be improved.One possible strategy for modifying envelope evolution is vaccination prior to infection. A vaccine-elicited memory immune response could focus and potentiate the humoral immune response that develops following infection. The possible consequence of vaccination has not been assessed, however, because of the limited number of human volunteers who have received highly immunogenic envelope immunogens and subsequently became infected with HIV-1.Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection of rhesus monkeys provides a powerful model to study the effect of vaccination on envelope evolution. Like HIV-1, SIV employs both the CD4 molecule and the chemokine receptor CCR5 to enter a target cell and cause an AIDS-like disease in macaques (16, 22). Both SIV and HIV-1 envelopes are heavily glycosylated, with approximately 50% of their mass derived from carbohydrates (14, 21). SIV and HIV-1 envelopes share approximately 40% amino acid homology (10, 11) and have overlapping variable and constant regions, although the variable region 3 (V3) of HIV-1 envelope does not align with the homologous region of SIV envelope (7). Following SIV infection in rhesus monkeys, SIV envelope evolves most rapidly in variable regions 1 and 4 (V1 and V4, respectively), leading to nucleotide additions, deletions, and/or mutations that can potentially translate to changes in glycosylation (7, 9, 13, 15, 19, 29, 30).Studies done to characterize SIV neutralization suggest that it occurs through mechanisms similar to those seen in HIV-1 neutralization. Amino acid mutations in the envelope of both viruses contribute to the evasion of antibody binding directly by changing recognition sequences and/or envelope conformation. In addition, the glycosylation of envelope serves as a further obstacle to antibody recognition (20, 33, 40). Considerable effort has been devoted to defining neutralizing epitopes of the HIV and SIV envelopes. The known neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies elicited during natural infection are directed against HIV-1 envelope target sites on both gp120 and gp41, including the V3 region, the CD4 binding site, oligomannose residues of gp120, and gp41 (17, 31). The neutralizing epitope profile of SIV envelope includes the CD4 binding site and gp41 but not the V3 region. There is conflicting evidence as to whether V1, V2, and/or V4 of SIV are targets for antibody neutralization (15, 18, 19). The present study addresses whether vaccine-induced immune responses accelerate the generation of autologous neutralizing antibodies following SIV challenge in rhesus monkeys and how this humoral immune response can potentially shape viral sequence evolution.     

Fundamental Difference in the Content of High-Mannose Carbohydrate in the HIV-1 and HIV-2 Lineages

The virus-encoded envelope proteins of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) typically contain 26 to 30 sites for N-linked carbohydrate attachment. N-linked carbohydrate can be of three major types: high mannose, complex, or hybrid. The lectin proteins from Galanthus nivalis (GNA) and Hippeastrum hybrid (HHA), which specifically bind high-mannose carbohydrate, were found to potently inhibit the replication of a pathogenic cloned SIV from rhesus macaques, SIVmac239. Passage of SIVmac239 in the presence of escalating concentrations of GNA and HHA yielded a lectin-resistant virus population that uniformly eliminated three sites (of 26 total) for N-linked carbohydrate attachment (Asn-X-Ser or Asn-X-Thr) in the envelope protein. Two of these sites were in the gp120 surface subunit of the envelope protein (Asn244 and Asn460), and one site was in the envelope gp41 transmembrane protein (Asn625). Maximal resistance to GNA and HHA in a spreading infection was conferred to cloned variants that lacked all three sites in combination. Variant SIV gp120s exhibited dramatically decreased capacity for binding GNA compared to SIVmac239 gp120 in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Purified gp120s from six independent HIV type 1 (HIV-1) isolates and two SIV isolates from chimpanzees (SIVcpz) consistently bound GNA in ELISA at 3- to 10-fold-higher levels than gp120s from five SIV isolates from rhesus macaques or sooty mangabeys (SIVmac/sm) and four HIV-2 isolates. Thus, our data indicate that characteristic high-mannose carbohydrate contents have been retained in the cross-species transmission lineages for SIVcpz-HIV-1 (high), SIVsm-SIVmac (low), and SIVsm-HIV-2 (low).The envelope proteins of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) are heavily glycosylated. N-linked carbohydrate is attached to the nascent protein at the asparagine of the consensus sequence N-X-S or N-X-T, where X is any amino acid except a proline (31, 52, 53). The number of potential N-linked carbohydrate attachment sites in the surface subunit of Env (gp120) ranges from 18 to 33, with a median of 25 (34, 65). There are typically 3 or 4 potential N-linked sites in the ectodomain of the Env transmembrane protein (gp41) (34).N-linked glycosylation of a protein consists of the en bloc transfer of the carbohydrate core oligosaccharide (two N-acetylglucosamines, nine mannoses, and three glucoses) from dolichol to the asparagine of the N-linked attachment site (8, 60). Initially the attached carbohydrate is processed into the high-mannose type (8). In the Golgi complex, high-mannose carbohydrate may be further processed into complex or hybrid oligosaccharides (58). Incomplete processing of N-linked carbohydrate results in the production of high-mannose carbohydrate chains, which terminate in mannose (58). Fully processed complex carbohydrate chains terminate in galactose, N-acetylglucosamine, sialic acid, or glucose (33, 57). Hybrid carbohydrate chains have two branches from the core, one that terminates in mannose and one that terminates in a sugar of the complex type (63).Glycoproteins exist as a heterogeneous population, exhibiting heterogeneity with respect to the proportion of potential glycosylation sites that are occupied and to the oligosaccharide structure observed at each site. Factors that influence the type of carbohydrate chain that is attached at any one N-linked site are the accessibility of the carbohydrate chain to processing enzymes (49), protein sequences surrounding the site (5, 40), and the type of cell from which the protein is produced (19).The N-linked carbohydrate chains of HIV and SIV Env are critical for the proper folding and cleavage of the fusion-competent envelope spike (20, 59, 61). After Env is assembled, enzymatic removal of N-linked carbohydrate does not dramatically affect the functional conformation (2, 6, 7, 13, 24, 38). It is generally accepted that the carbohydrate attached to Env limits the ability of the underlying protein to be recognized by B cells (11, 48, 62). This carbohydrate also shields protein epitopes that would otherwise be the direct targets of antibodies that neutralize viral infection (41, 48, 62, 64). Furthermore, the high-mannose carbohydrates of HIV and SIV Env bind dynamically to an array of lectin proteins that are part of the host lymphoreticular system. The interaction of viral high-mannose carbohydrate with host lectin proteins has been associated with the enhancement (9, 16, 17, 43-45) or suppression (42, 56) of viral infection of CD4-positive T cells. The high-mannose carbohydrate of Env is also known to activate the release of immune-modulatory proteins from a subset of host antigen-presenting cells (12, 54).The plant lectin proteins from Galanthus nivalis (GNA) and Hippeastrum hybrid (HHA) specifically bind terminal α-1,3- and/or α-1,6-mannose of high-mannose oligosaccharides but not hybrid oligosaccharides (28, 55). GNA and HHA inhibit the replication of HIV-1 and SIVmac251, and uncloned, resistant populations of virus have been selected (3, 14). In this report, we define two N-linked sites in the external surface glycoprotein gp120 and one in the transmembrane glycoprotein gp41 whose mutation imparts high-level resistance to the inhibitory effects of GNA and HHA to cloned SIVmac239. Furthermore, using a GNA-binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we show that assorted HIV-1 and SIVcpz gp120s consistently are considerably higher in mannose content than assorted gp120s from SIVmac, SIVsm, and HIV-2. These results shed new light on the impact of virus-host evolutionary dynamics on viral carbohydrate composition, and they may have important implications for the mechanisms by which long-standing natural hosts such as sooty mangabeys can resist generalized lymphoid activation and disease despite high levels of SIV replication.     

Envelope-Modified Single-Cycle Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Selectively Enhances Antibody Responses and Partially Protects against Repeated,Low-Dose Vaginal Challenge

Immunization of rhesus macaques with strains of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) that are limited to a single cycle of infection elicits T-cell responses to multiple viral gene products and antibodies capable of neutralizing lab-adapted SIV, but not neutralization-resistant primary isolates of SIV. In an effort to improve upon the antibody responses, we immunized rhesus macaques with three strains of single-cycle SIV (scSIV) that express envelope glycoproteins modified to lack structural features thought to interfere with the development of neutralizing antibodies. These envelope-modified strains of scSIV lacked either five potential N-linked glycosylation sites in gp120, three potential N-linked glycosylation sites in gp41, or 100 amino acids in the V1V2 region of gp120. Three doses consisting of a mixture of the three envelope-modified strains of scSIV were administered on weeks 0, 6, and 12, followed by two booster inoculations with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G trans-complemented scSIV on weeks 18 and 24. Although this immunization regimen did not elicit antibodies capable of detectably neutralizing SIV_mac239 or SIV_mac251_UCD, neutralizing antibody titers to the envelope-modified strains were selectively enhanced. Virus-specific antibodies and T cells were observed in the vaginal mucosa. After 20 weeks of repeated, low-dose vaginal challenge with SIV_mac251_UCD, six of eight immunized animals versus six of six naïve controls became infected. Although immunization did not significantly reduce the likelihood of acquiring immunodeficiency virus infection, statistically significant reductions in peak and set point viral loads were observed in the immunized animals relative to the naïve control animals.Development of a safe and effective vaccine for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is an urgent public health priority, but remains a formidable scientific challenge. Passive transfer experiments in macaques demonstrate neutralizing antibodies can prevent infection by laboratory-engineered simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) strains (6, 33, 34, 53, 59). However, no current vaccine approach is capable of eliciting antibodies that neutralize primary isolates with neutralization-resistant envelope glycoproteins. Virus-specific T-cell responses can be elicited by prime-boost strategies utilizing recombinant DNA and/or viral vectors (3, 10, 11, 16, 36, 73, 77, 78), which confer containment of viral loads following challenge with SHIV_89.6P (3, 13, 66, 68). Unfortunately, similar vaccine regimens are much less effective against SIV_mac239 and SIV_mac251 (12, 16, 31, 36, 73), which bear closer resemblance to most transmitted HIV-1 isolates in their inability to utilize CXCR4 as a coreceptor (18, 23, 24, 88) and inherent high degree of resistance to neutralization by antibodies or soluble CD4 (43, 55, 56). Live, attenuated SIV can provide apparent sterile protection against challenge with SIV_mac239 and SIV_mac251 or at least contain viral replication below the limit of detection (20, 22, 80). Due to the potential of the attenuated viruses themselves to cause disease in neonatal rhesus macaques (5, 7, 81) and to revert to a pathogenic phenotype through the accumulation of mutations over prolonged periods of replication in adult animals (2, 35, 76), attenuated HIV-1 is not under consideration for use in humans.As an experimental vaccine approach designed to retain many of the features of live, attenuated SIV, without the risk of reversion to a pathogenic phenotype, we and others devised genetic approaches for producing strains of SIV that are limited to a single cycle of infection (27, 28, 30, 38, 39, 45). In a previous study, immunization of rhesus macaques with single-cycle SIV (scSIV) trans-complemented with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G elicited potent virus-specific T-cell responses (39), which were comparable in magnitude to T-cell responses elicited by optimized prime-boost regimens based on recombinant DNA and viral vectors (3, 16, 36, 68, 73, 78). Antibodies were elicited that neutralized lab-adapted SIV_mac251_LA (39). However, despite the presentation of the native, trimeric SIV envelope glycoprotein (Env) on the surface of infected cells and virions, none of the scSIV-immunized macaques developed antibody responses that neutralized SIV_mac239 (39). Therefore, we have now introduced Env modifications into scSIV that facilitate the development of neutralizing antibodies.Most primate lentiviral envelope glycoproteins are inherently resistant to neutralizing antibodies due to structural and thermodynamic properties that have evolved to enable persistent replication in the face of vigorous antibody responses (17, 46, 47, 64, 71, 75, 79, 83, 85). Among these, extensive N-linked glycosylation renders much of the Env surface inaccessible to antibodies (17, 48, 60, 63, 75). Removal of N-linked glycans from gp120 or gp41 by mutagenesis facilitates the induction of antibodies to epitopes that are occluded by these carbohydrates in the wild-type virus (64, 85). Consequently, antibodies from animals infected with glycan-deficient strains neutralize these strains better than antibodies from animals infected with the fully glycosylated SIV_mac239 parental strain (64, 85). Most importantly with regard to immunogen design, animals infected with the glycan-deficient strains developed higher neutralizing antibody titers against wild-type SIV_mac239 (64, 85). Additionally, the removal of a single N-linked glycan in gp120 enhanced the induction of neutralizing antibodies against SHIV_89.6P and SHIV_SF162 in a prime-boost strategy by 20-fold (50). These observations suggest that potential neutralization determinants accessible in the wild-type Env are poorly immunogenic unless specific N-linked glycans in gp120 and gp41 are eliminated by mutagenesis.The variable loop regions 1 and 2 (V1V2) of HIV-1 and SIV gp120 may also interfere with the development of neutralizing antibodies. Deletion of V1V2 from HIV-1 gp120 permitted neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to CD4-inducible epitopes to bind to gp120 in the absence of CD4, suggesting that V1V2 occludes potential neutralization determinants prior to the engagement of CD4 (82). A deletion in V2 of HIV-1 Env-exposed epitopes was conserved between clades (69), improved the ability of a secreted Env trimer to elicit neutralizing antibodies (9), and was present in a vaccine that conferred complete protection against SHIV_SF162P4 (8). A deletion of 100 amino acids in V1V2 of SIV_mac239 rendered the virus sensitive to monoclonal antibodies with various specificities (41). Furthermore, three of five macaques experimentally infected with SIV_mac239 with V1V2 deleted resisted superinfection with wild-type SIV_mac239 (51). Thus, occlusion of potential neutralization determinants by the V1V2 loop structure may contribute to the poor immunogenicity of the wild-type envelope glycoprotein.Here we tested the hypothesis that antibody responses to scSIV could be improved by immunizing macaques with strains of scSIV engineered to eliminate structural features that interfere with the development of neutralizing antibodies. Antibodies to Env-modified strains were selectively enhanced, but these did not neutralize the wild-type SIV strains. We then tested the hypothesis that immunization might prevent infection in a repeated, low-dose vaginal challenge model of heterosexual HIV-1 transmission. Indeed, while all six naïve control animals became infected, two of eight immunized animals remained uninfected after 20 weeks of repeated vaginal challenge. Relative to the naïve control group, reductions in peak and set point viral loads were statistically significant in the immunized animals that became infected.