mTORC1-Activated S6K1 Phosphorylates Rictor on Threonine 1135 and Regulates mTORC2 Signaling

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a conserved Ser/Thr kinase that forms two functionally distinct complexes important for nutrient and growth factor signaling. While mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) regulates mRNA translation and ribosome biogenesis, mTORC2 plays an important role in the phosphorylation and subsequent activation of Akt. Interestingly, mTORC1 negatively regulates Akt activation, but whether mTORC1 signaling directly targets mTORC2 remains unknown. Here we show that growth factors promote the phosphorylation of Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), an essential subunit of mTORC2. We found that Rictor phosphorylation requires mTORC1 activity and, more specifically, the p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1). We identified several phosphorylation sites in Rictor and found that Thr1135 is directly phosphorylated by S6K1 in vitro and in vivo, in a rapamycin-sensitive manner. Phosphorylation of Rictor on Thr1135 did not affect mTORC2 assembly, kinase activity, or cellular localization. However, cells expressing a Rictor T1135A mutant were found to have increased mTORC2-dependent phosphorylation of Akt. In addition, phosphorylation of the Akt substrates FoxO1/3a and glycogen synthase kinase 3α/β (GSK3α/β) was found to be increased in these cells, indicating that S6K1-mediated phosphorylation of Rictor inhibits mTORC2 and Akt signaling. Together, our results uncover a new regulatory link between the two mTOR complexes, whereby Rictor integrates mTORC1-dependent signaling.The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an evolutionarily conserved phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-related Ser/Thr kinase that integrates signals from nutrients, energy sufficiency, and growth factors to regulate cell growth as well as organ and body size in a variety of organisms (reviewed in references 4, 38, 49, and 77). mTOR was discovered as the molecular target of rapamycin, an antifungal agent used clinically as an immunosuppressant and more recently as an anticancer drug (5, 20). Recent evidence indicates that deregulation of the mTOR pathway occurs in a majority of human cancers (12, 18, 25, 46), suggesting that rapamycin analogs may be potent antineoplastic therapeutic agents.mTOR forms two distinct multiprotein complexes, the rapamycin-sensitive and -insensitive mTOR complexes 1 and 2 (mTORC1 and mTORC2), respectively (6, 47). In cells, rapamycin interacts with FKBP12 and targets the FKBP12-rapamycin binding (FRB) domain of mTORC1, thereby inhibiting some of its function (13, 40, 66). mTORC1 is comprised of the mTOR catalytic subunit and four associated proteins, Raptor (regulatory associated protein of mTOR), mLST8 (mammalian lethal with sec13 protein 8), PRAS40 (proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa), and Deptor (28, 43, 44, 47, 59, 73, 74). The small GTPase Rheb (Ras homolog enriched in brain) is a key upstream activator of mTORC1 that is negatively regulated by the tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (TSC1)/TSC2 GTPase-activating protein complex (reviewed in reference 35). mTORC1 is activated by PI3K and Ras signaling through direct phosphorylation and inactivation of TSC2 by Akt, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and p90 ribosomal protein S6 kinase (RSK) (11, 37, 48, 53, 63). mTORC1 activity is also regulated at the level of Raptor. Whereas low cellular energy levels negatively regulate mTORC1 activity through phosphorylation of Raptor by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (27), growth signaling pathways activating the Ras/ERK pathway positively regulate mTORC1 activity through direct phosphorylation of Raptor by RSK (10). More recent evidence has also shown that mTOR itself positively regulates mTORC1 activity by directly phosphorylating Raptor at proline-directed sites (20a, 75). Countertransport of amino acids (55) and amino acid signaling through the Rag GTPases were also shown to regulate mTORC1 activity (45, 65). When activated, mTORC1 phosphorylates two main regulators of mRNA translation and ribosome biogenesis, the AGC (protein kinase A, G, and C) family kinase p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), and thus stimulates protein synthesis and cellular growth (50, 60).The second mTOR complex, mTORC2, is comprised of mTOR, Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), mSin1 (mammalian stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase-interacting protein 1), mLST8, PRR5 (proline-rich region 5), and Deptor (21, 39, 58, 59, 66, 76, 79). Rapamycin does not directly target and inhibit mTORC2, but long-term treatment with this drug was shown to correlate with mTORC2 disassembly and cytoplasmic accumulation of Rictor (21, 39, 62, 79). Whereas mTORC1 regulates hydrophobic motif phosphorylation of S6K1, mTORC2 has been shown to phosphorylate other members of the AGC family of kinases. Biochemical and genetic evidence has demonstrated that mTORC2 phosphorylates Akt at Ser473 (26, 39, 68, 70), thereby contributing to growth factor-mediated Akt activation (6, 7, 52). Deletion or knockdown of the mTORC2 components mTOR, Rictor, mSin1, and mLST8 has a dramatic effect on mTORC2 assembly and Akt phosphorylation at Ser473 (26, 39, 79). mTORC2 was also shown to regulate protein kinase Cα (PKCα) (26, 66) and, more recently, serum- and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase 1 (SGK1) (4, 22). Recent evidence implicates mTORC2 in the regulation of Akt and PKCα phosphorylation at their turn motifs (19, 36), but whether mTOR directly phosphorylates these sites remains a subject of debate (4).Activation of mTORC1 has been shown to negatively regulate Akt phosphorylation in response to insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) (reviewed in references 30 and 51). This negative regulation is particularly evident in cell culture models with defects in the TSC1/TSC2 complex, where mTORC1 and S6K1 are constitutively activated. Phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) by mTORC1 (72) and its downstream target S6K1 has been shown to decrease its stability and lead to an inability of insulin or IGF1 to activate PI3K and Akt (29, 69). Although the mechanism is unknown, platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGF-Rβ) has been found to be downregulated in TSC1- and TSC2-deficient murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), contributing to a reduction of PI3K signaling (80). Interestingly, inhibition of Akt phosphorylation by mTORC1 has also been observed in the presence of growth factors other than IGF-1, insulin, or PDGF, suggesting that there are other mechanisms by which mTORC1 activation restricts Akt activity in cells (reviewed in references 6 and 31). Recent evidence demonstrates that rapamycin treatment causes a significant increase in Rictor electrophoretic mobility (2, 62), suggesting that phosphorylation of the mTORC2 subunit Rictor may be regulated by mTORC1 or downstream protein kinases.Herein, we demonstrate that Rictor is phosphorylated by S6K1 in response to mTORC1 activation. We demonstrate that Thr1135 is directly phosphorylated by S6K1 and found that a Rictor mutant lacking this phosphorylation site increases Akt phosphorylation induced by growth factor stimulation. Cells expressing the Rictor T1135A mutant were found to have increased Akt signaling to its substrates compared to Rictor wild-type- and T1135D mutant-expressing cells. Together, our results suggest that Rictor integrates mTORC1 signaling via its phosphorylation by S6K1, resulting in the inhibition of mTORC2 and Akt signaling.     

Site-Specific mTOR Phosphorylation Promotes mTORC1-Mediated Signaling and Cell Growth

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1 (mTORC1) functions as a rapamycin-sensitive environmental sensor that promotes cellular biosynthetic processes in response to growth factors and nutrients. While diverse physiological stimuli modulate mTORC1 signaling, the direct biochemical mechanisms underlying mTORC1 regulation remain poorly defined. Indeed, while three mTOR phosphorylation sites have been reported, a functional role for site-specific mTOR phosphorylation has not been demonstrated. Here we identify a new site of mTOR phosphorylation (S1261) by tandem mass spectrometry and demonstrate that insulin-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling promotes mTOR S1261 phosphorylation in both mTORC1 and mTORC2. Here we focus on mTORC1 and show that TSC/Rheb signaling promotes mTOR S1261 phosphorylation in an amino acid-dependent, rapamycin-insensitive, and autophosphorylation-independent manner. Our data reveal a functional role for mTOR S1261 phosphorylation in mTORC1 action, as S1261 phosphorylation promotes mTORC1-mediated substrate phosphorylation (e.g., p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 [S6K1] and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1) and cell growth to increased cell size. Moreover, Rheb-driven mTOR S2481 autophosphorylation and S6K1 phosphorylation require S1261 phosphorylation. These data provide the first evidence that site-specific mTOR phosphorylation regulates mTORC1 function and suggest a model whereby insulin-stimulated mTOR S1261 phosphorylation promotes mTORC1 autokinase activity, substrate phosphorylation, and cell growth.The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), an evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine protein kinase, senses and integrates signals from diverse environmental cues (14, 31, 50, 74). mTOR associates with different partner proteins to form functionally distinct signaling complexes (4). The immunosuppressive drug rapamycin acutely inhibits signaling by mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) (22), which contains mTOR, mLST8/GβL, raptor, and PRAS40 (24, 33, 34, 54, 67). Rapamycin fails to acutely inhibit signaling by mTORC2, which contains mTOR, mLST8/GβL, rictor, mSin1, and PRR5/Protor (18, 32, 47, 55, 73, 76). mTORC1 promotes various biosynthetic processes, including protein synthesis, cell growth (an increase in cell mass and size), and cell proliferation (an increase in cell number) (14, 40, 74). During growth factor (e.g., insulin) and nutrient (e.g., amino acids and glucose) sufficiency, mTORC1 phosphorylates the translational regulators p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1) to coordinately upregulate protein biosynthesis (40). Both S6K1 and 4EBP1 contain a TOR signaling motif, which mediates their interaction with raptor and thus facilitates their recruitment to the mTOR kinase (10, 44, 57, 58). In addition to regulating protein synthesis, mTORC1-mediated phosphorylation of S6K1 and 4EBP also promotes cell growth and cell cycle progression (15, 16). While more recently identified and thus less well characterized than mTORC1, mTORC2 mediates the phosphorylation of AGC kinase family members (e.g., Akt [also known as protein kinase B, PKB], PKCα, and SGK1) on their hydrophobic motifs and modulates the organization of the actin cytoskeleton (20, 26, 32, 55, 56).The insulin pathway represents the best-characterized activator of mTORC1 signaling to date, and thus many signaling intermediates that link insulin receptor activation to mTORC1 have been identified (12, 31). Complementary work using Drosophila melanogaster genetics and mammalian cell culture identified TSC1 (hamartin) and TSC2 (tuberin) as upstream negative regulators of mTORC1 (27). Inactivation of either the TSC1 or TSC2 genes, whose protein products heterodimerize to form a tumor suppressor complex, causes the development of benign tumors in diverse organs in both humans and rodents, a disease known as tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) (36). TSC2 contains a GTPase-activating protein domain that acts on Rheb, a Ras-like GTP binding protein that activates mTORC1 (27). Thus, in TSC-deficient cells, constitutive Rheb-GTP leads to chronically high mTORC1 signaling. While the mechanism by which Rheb-GTP activates mTORC1 remains incompletely understood, Rheb coimmunoprecipitates with mTOR and directly activates mTORC1 kinase activity in vivo and in vitro when GTP bound (2, 38, 54). Rheb has been reported to augment the activity of PLD1, an enzyme that catalyzes the production of the lipid second messenger phosphatidic acid, which contributes to the mitogenic activation of mTORC1 signaling (13, 62). Additionally, Rheb-GTP was reported to induce the dissociation of the endogenous mTOR inhibitor FKBP38 (3), although aspects of this model have been questioned (72). Insulin/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling reduces the inhibitory effect of TSC on mTORC1 via Akt-mediated phosphorylation of TSC2 (29, 42, 64). Additionally, Ras-regulated signaling via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and RSK also inhibits TSC via PI3K/Akt-independent phosphorylation of TSC2 (39, 51, 63). In contrast, glucose deprivation enhances TSC''s inhibitory effect on mTORC1 signaling via AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-mediated phosphorylation of TSC2 (on different sites) (30). Thus, TSC functions as a central nexus of diverse physiological signals to fine-tune mTORC1 signaling depending on environmental conditions (27). While the mechanism by which amino acids promote mTORC1 signaling has remained elusive, compelling new data reveal that the Rag GTPases link amino acid sensing to mTORC1 activation (35, 52, 53). During amino acid sufficiency, GTP-bound Rag heterodimers bind raptor and recruit mTORC1 to an endomembrane compartment that contains the mTORC1 activator Rheb; thus, amino acid sufficiency may function to prime mTORC1 for subsequent growth factor-mediated activation via a dynamic subcellular redistribution mechanism (52).Despite the well-characterized regulation of mTORC1 signaling by growth factors (e.g., insulin), nutrients (e.g., amino acids and glucose), and cellular stress (e.g., hypoxia) and the identification of numerous signaling mediators of these pathways, the direct molecular mechanisms by which cellular signals modulate mTORC1 action remain obscure (31). While three phosphorylation sites (P-sites) on mTOR have been reported to date (T2446, S2448, and S2481), no function has yet been ascribed to any site (7, 43, 49, 59). Here we identify S1261 as a novel mTOR phosphorylation site in vivo in cultured mammalian cells and provide the first evidence that site-specific mTOR phosphorylation regulates mTORC1 function. We show that insulin signals via the PI3K/TSC/Rheb pathway in an amino acid-dependent and rapamycin-insensitive manner to promote mTOR S1261 phosphorylation, which regulates mTORC1 autokinase activity, biochemical signaling to downstream substrates, and cell growth to increased cell size, a major cellular function of mTORC1. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying mTORC1 regulation will enable us to better understand how mTORC1 senses environmental stimuli to control cellular physiology. As aberrantly upregulated mTORC1 signaling likely contributes to cancer, insulin-resistant diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, understanding mTORC1 regulation may aid in the development of novel therapeutics for these prevalent human diseases (11, 21, 28).     

Regulation of mTORC1 and mTORC2 Complex Assembly by Phosphatidic Acid: Competition with Rapamycin

mTOR, the mammalian target of rapamycin, is a critical node for control of cell growth and survival and has widely been implicated in cancer survival signals. mTOR exists in two complexes: mTORC1 and mTORC2. Phospholipase D (PLD) and its metabolite phosphatidic acid (PA) have been implicated in the regulation of mTOR; however, their role has been controversial. We report here that suppression of PLD prevents phosphorylation of the mTORC1 substrate S6 kinase (S6K) at Thr389 and the mTORC2 substrate Akt at Ser473. Suppression of PLD also blocked insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation at Ser473 and the mTORC2-dependent phosphorylation of PRAS40. Importantly, PA was required for the association of mTOR with Raptor to form mTORC1 and that of mTOR with Rictor to form mTORC2. The effect of PA was competitive with rapamycin—with much higher concentrations of rapamycin needed to compete with the PA-mTORC2 interaction than with PA-mTORC1. Suppressing PA production substantially increased the sensitivity of mTORC2 to rapamycin. Data provided here demonstrate a PA requirement for the stabilization of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes and reveal a mechanism for the inhibitory effect of rapamycin on mTOR. This study also suggests that by suppressing PLD activity, mTORC2 could be targeted therapeutically with rapamycin.It has become apparent during the past decade that a critical aspect of tumor progression is the suppression of default apoptotic programs that constitute what is likely the most important protection against cancer. Cellular signals that suppress apoptosis have come to be known as “survival signals.” A common node for survival signals is mTOR, the mammalian target of rapamycin (5, 13, 14, 25). mTOR exists in two distinct complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2 (21), that differ in their subunit composition and sensitivity to rapamycin. mTORC1 consists of a complex that includes mTOR and a protein known as Raptor (regulatory associated protein of mTOR), whereas mTORC2 consists of a complex that includes mTOR and a protein known as Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR) (13, 14). There are also mTORC2 complexes that can be distinguished by association with different isoforms of mSin1 (9). While much is known about the regulation of mTORC1 (21), very little is known about the regulation of mTORC2.mTORC1 is highly sensitive to rapamycin, whereas mTORC2 is relatively insensitive to rapamycin (21). However, it was recently reported that long-term exposure to rapamycin prevented the formation of mTORC2 complexes and blocked the phosphorylation of the mTORC2 substrate Akt at Ser473 (24, 38). Rapamycin, in association with FK506 binding protein 12 (FKBP12), has been reported to interact with mTOR in a manner that is competitive with phosphatidic acid (PA), the metabolic product of phospholipase D (PLD) (2, 4). PLD, like mTOR, has been implicated in survival signals in several human cancer cell lines (1, 10, 11, 27, 32, 39). Since rapamycin-FKBP12 competes with PA for binding to mTOR, the sensitivity of mTORC2 complex formation to rapamycin suggests that PA facilitates the assembly of mTORC2—and ultimately the activation of mTORC2. We report here that the assembly of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes is dependent upon PLD and its metabolite PA. The study also provides mechanistic insight into how rapamycin impacts on mTOR-mediated signals and how PLD regulates mTOR by facilitating the formation of mTOR complexes.     

Glycolytic Flux Signals to mTOR through Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase-Mediated Regulation of Rheb

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) interacts with raptor to form the protein complex mTORC1 (mTOR complex 1), which plays a central role in the regulation of cell growth in response to environmental cues. Given that glucose is a primary fuel source and a biosynthetic precursor, how mTORC1 signaling is coordinated with glucose metabolism has been an important question. Here, we found that the glycolytic enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) binds Rheb and inhibits mTORC1 signaling. Under low-glucose conditions, GAPDH prevents Rheb from binding to mTOR and thereby inhibits mTORC1 signaling. High glycolytic flux suppresses the interaction between GAPDH and Rheb and thus allows Rheb to activate mTORC1. Silencing of GAPDH or blocking of the Rheb-GAPDH interaction desensitizes mTORC1 signaling to changes in the level of glucose. The GAPDH-dependent regulation of mTORC1 in response to glucose availability occurred even in TSC1-deficient cells and AMPK-silenced cells, supporting the idea that the GAPDH-Rheb pathway functions independently of the AMPK axis. Furthermore, we show that glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, a glycolytic intermediate that binds GAPDH, destabilizes the Rheb-GAPDH interaction even under low-glucose conditions, explaining how high-glucose flux suppresses the interaction and activates mTORC1 signaling. Taken together, our results suggest that the glycolytic flux regulates mTOR''s access to Rheb by regulating the Rheb-GAPDH interaction, thereby allowing mTORC1 to coordinate cell growth with glucose availability.The mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) signal transduction pathway acts as a central controller of cell growth in mammals (20, 23, 29). mTORC1 integrates a wide range of intracellular and extracellular signals, including insulin, availability of nutrients (glucose and amino acids), cellular energy status, and hypoxia, to regulate protein synthesis and cell growth (11, 12, 17, 36, 46). Many of these environmental cues are integrated into tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC1-TSC2), the major upstream regulator of mTORC1. In response to the absence of insulin and to the low-energy status of cells, the TSC1-TSC2 complex stimulates the GTPase function of Rheb, a small GTPase that acts as a proximal key activator of mTORC1, which leads to the inhibition of Rheb-mediated mTORC1 activation. In contrast, inactivation of the TSC1-TSC2 complex results in the accumulation of GTP-bound Rheb and thus activation of mTORC1 (3, 13, 21, 27, 32, 39). For this reason, both the loss of TSC proteins and the overexpression of Rheb cause hyperactivation of mTORC1 signaling, which is frequently observed in many common human cancers (2, 5, 19, 25, 33). Therefore, a tight regulation of Rheb activity is critical for the proper operation of the mTORC1 pathway in response to environmental cues.Rheb is an atypical member of the Ras superfamily of GTPases (1, 10, 47). As with other small GTPases, the activity of Rheb is regulated by its guanine nucleotide binding status. However, the negative control of GTP-bound Rheb by the TSC1-TSC2 complex has only recently been investigated, and the regulation of the nucleotide binding status of Rheb is not fully understood. A recent study proposed that translationally controlled tumor protein may function as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rheb that causes the accumulation of GTP-bound Rheb (18). GTP-bound Rheb is essential for activating mTOR kinase (21, 28, 38). However, the interaction between Rheb and mTOR does not depend on the GTP binding status of Rheb (30), raising questions regarding the mechanism by which Rheb activates mTORC1. Recently, FKBP38 (immunophilin FK506-binding protein, 38 kDa) was found to be a direct binding partner of Rheb and an inhibitor of mTORC1 (4). GTP-bound Rheb binds FKBP38 and releases FKBP38 from mTORC1, resulting in activation of the mTORC1 pathway. However, there have been conflicting results regarding the effects of nutrient availability on Rheb activity (31, 37, 42, 50) and the effect of these newly identified regulators of Rheb function (44, 45). Thus, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying Rheb regulation and Rheb-mediated mTORC1 activation have remained unclear.In this study, we identified glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (Gly-3-P) dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a novel Rheb binding protein and a negative regulator of Rheb. We found that the interaction between GAPDH and Rheb is induced when the glycolytic flux is suppressed under low-glucose conditions to inhibit mTORC1. Here, we provide a molecular mechanism underlying the cross talk between the glycolytic flux and the mTORC1 signaling.     

Mitotic Raptor Promotes mTORC1 Activity,G2/M Cell Cycle Progression,and Internal Ribosome Entry Site-Mediated mRNA Translation

The mTOR signaling complex integrates signals from growth factors and nutrient availability to control cell growth and proliferation, in part through effects on the protein-synthetic machinery. Protein synthesis rates fluctuate throughout the cell cycle but diminish significantly during the G₂/M transition. The fate of the mTOR complex and its role in coordinating cell growth and proliferation signals with protein synthesis during mitosis remain unknown. Here we demonstrate that the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway, which stimulates protein synthesis, is actually hyperactive during mitosis despite decreased protein synthesis and reduced activity of mTORC1 upstream activators. We describe previously unknown G₂/M-specific phosphorylation of a component of mTORC1, the protein raptor, and demonstrate that mitotic raptor phosphorylation alters mTORC1 function during mitosis. Phosphopeptide mapping and mutational analysis demonstrate that mitotic phosphorylation of raptor facilitates cell cycle transit through G₂/M. Phosphorylation-deficient mutants of raptor cause cells to delay in G₂/M, whereas depletion of raptor causes cells to accumulate in G₁. We identify cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1 [cdc2]) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) pathways as two probable mitosis-regulated protein kinase pathways involved in mitosis-specific raptor phosphorylation and altered mTORC1 activity. In addition, mitotic raptor promotes translation by internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) on mRNA during mitosis and is demonstrated to be associated with rapamycin resistance. These data suggest that this pathway may play a role in increased IRES-dependent mRNA translation during mitosis and in rapamycin insensitivity.Cell growth and cell division are tightly coordinated processes required for cells to remain equal in size after division. In unicellular organisms, cell growth and proliferation are coordinated by nutrient availability, whereas their multicellular counterparts must also respond to growth factor input. Both processes lead to organismal growth as well as to increased cell number and cell mass. Cell growth and cell proliferation are also linked via the mTOR signaling pathway (16, 17). The mTOR kinase forms a distinct signaling complex (mTORC1) that participates in the coordination of nutrient and growth factor signaling. mTORC1 is composed of the kinase mTOR, the adaptor protein raptor, and the regulatory protein LST8 (25, 33, 34, 72).Accumulation of cellular proteins leads to cell growth and cell division. However, cell growth occurs only during certain phases of the cell cycle, necessitating that protein synthesis rates oscillate during cell cycling (40). In addition, in quiescent cells in G₀, protein synthesis rates are significantly reduced, whereas a select group of mRNAs maintain active translation (20, 68). During the G₁ phase, overall protein synthesis rates increase through S phase to allow cells to grow and enter another round of cell division while maintaining cell size (2, 3, 42, 45). As with G₀, entrance into mitosis (G₂/M phase) results in a global downregulation by as much as 60 to 80% of cap-dependent mRNA translation in primary, immortalized, and some transformed cells (5, 14, 29).Studies report several possible mechanisms for inhibition of protein synthesis during mitosis. Translation initiation requires the formation of an initiation factor complex known as eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), which consists of cap binding protein eIF4E, molecular scaffold protein eIF4G, and RNA helicase eIF4A. Together, they recruit ribosomes to mRNAs via bridging interactions between the 7-methyl-GTP (m⁷GTP) 5′ cap and the small 40S ribosomal subunit. Downregulation of protein synthesis during G₂/M was first ascribed to hypophosphorylation of eIF4E and the eIF4E binding proteins (4E-BPs) (5, 46). 4E-BPs are activated by hypophosphorylation, which allows them to bind and sequester eIF4E, preventing it from binding eIF4G and thereby blocking cap-dependent mRNA translation. More recently, several studies suggest that 4E-BP1, the major 4E-BP and a key target of mTORC1, is actually hyperphosphorylated (inactivated) during mitosis (26, 49). It is puzzling, then, that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT network and AKT itself (which modulate mTORC1 activity) are reportedly inactivated during late mitosis (1, 9, 22). In addition, phosphorylation of another mTORC1 target, ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1), and its activity are actually highest during G₂/M phase, consistent with elevated mTORC1 activity during mitosis (6).In this study we show that, despite repression of AKT and other activators of mTORC1 activity in mitosis, mTORC1 remains active and phosphorylates 4E-BP1 and S6K1 during G₂/M. We describe the multisite phosphorylation of raptor during mitosis, and we identify seven mitosis-specific raptor phosphorylation sites. By developing phosphomimetic and phosphorylation-deficient mutants of raptor, we show that hyperphosphorylated raptor promotes cell cycle transit through G₂/M, whereas hypophosphorylated raptor promotes transit through G₁. Raptor phosphorylation is shown to involve kinase pathways that are known to be active during mitosis, including cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1 [cdc2]) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) pathways that are also upregulated in certain human cancers, including breast cancers. These and other findings disclose a novel regulatory network for mTORC1 that is active during mitosis, important for G₂/M progression and increased internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-dependent translation during mitosis, and indirectly associated with rapamycin resistance.     

Protein Tyrosine Kinase 6 Directly Phosphorylates AKT and Promotes AKT Activation in Response to Epidermal Growth Factor

Protein tyrosine kinase 6 (PTK6) is a nonmyristoylated Src-related intracellular tyrosine kinase. Although not expressed in the normal mammary gland, PTK6 is expressed in a majority of human breast tumors examined, and it has been linked to ErbB receptor signaling and AKT activation. Here we demonstrate that AKT is a direct substrate of PTK6 and that AKT tyrosine residues 315 and 326 are phosphorylated by PTK6. Association of PTK6 with AKT occurs through the SH3 domain of PTK6 and is enhanced through SH2 domain-mediated interactions following tyrosine phosphorylation of AKT. Using Src, Yes, and Fyn null mouse embryonic fibroblasts (SYF cells), we show that PTK6 phosphorylates AKT in a Src family kinase-independent manner. Introduction of PTK6 into SYF cells sensitized these cells to physiological levels of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and increased AKT activation. Stable introduction of active PTK6 into SYF cells also resulted in increased proliferation. Knockdown of PTK6 in the BPH-1 human prostate epithelial cell line led to decreased AKT activation in response to EGF. Our data indicate that in addition to promoting growth factor receptor-mediated activation of AKT, PTK6 can directly activate AKT to promote oncogenic signaling.Protein tyrosine kinase 6 (PTK6; also known as the breast tumor kinase BRK) is an intracellular Src-related tyrosine kinase (9, 48). Human PTK6 was identified in cultured human melanocytes (32) and breast tumor cells (39), while its mouse orthologue was cloned from normal small intestinal epithelial cell RNA (50). Although PTK6 shares overall structural similarity with Src family tyrosine kinases, it lacks an N-terminal myristoylation consensus sequence for membrane targeting (39, 51). As a consequence, PTK6 is localized to different cellular compartments, including the nucleus (14, 15). PTK6 is expressed in normal differentiated epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract (34, 42, 51), prostate (14), and skin (51-53). Expression of PTK6 is upregulated in different types of cancers, including breast carcinomas (6, 39, 54), colon cancer (34), ovarian cancer (47), head and neck cancers (33), and metastatic melanoma cells (16). The significance of apparent opposing signaling roles for PTK6 in normal differentiation and cancer is still poorly understood.In human breast tumor cells, PTK6 enhances signaling from members of the ErbB receptor family (10, 29, 30, 36, 40, 49, 54). In the HB4a immortalized human mammary gland luminal epithelial cell line, PTK6 promoted epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced ErbB3 tyrosine phosphorylation and AKT activation (29). In response to EGF stimulation, PTK6 promoted phosphorylation of the focal adhesion protein paxillin and Rac1-mediated cell migration (10). PTK6 can be activated by the ErbB3 ligand heregulin and promotes activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 (ERK5) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in breast cancer cells (40). PTK6 can also phosphorylate p190RhoGAP-A and stimulate its activity, leading to RhoA inactivation and Ras activation and thereby promoting EGF-dependent breast cancer cell migration and proliferation (49). Expression of PTK6 has been correlated with ErbB2 expression in human breast cancers (4, 5, 54).AKT (also called protein kinase B) is a serine-threonine kinase that is activated downstream of growth factor receptors (38). It is a key player in signaling pathways that regulate energy metabolism, proliferation, and cell survival (7, 45). Aberrant activation of AKT through diverse mechanisms has been discovered in different cancers (2). AKT activation requires phosphorylation of AKT on threonine residue 308 and serine residue 473. The significance of phosphorylation of AKT on tyrosine residues is less well understood. Src has been shown to phosphorylate AKT on conserved tyrosine residues 315 and 326 near the activation loop (11). Substitution of these two tyrosine residues with phenylalanine abolished AKT kinase activity stimulated by EGF (11). Use of the Src family inhibitor PP2 impaired AKT activation following IGF-1 stimulation of oligodendrocytes (13). The RET/PTC receptor tyrosine kinase that responds to glial cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor also phosphorylated AKT tyrosine residue 315 promoting activation of AKT (28). AKT tyrosine residue 474 was phosphorylated when cells were treated with the tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor pervanadate, and phosphorylation of tyrosine 474 contributed to full activation of AKT (12). Recently, the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Ack1 was shown to regulate AKT tyrosine phosphorylation and activation (37).Here we show that AKT is a cytoplasmic substrate of the intracellular tyrosine kinase PTK6. We identify the tyrosine residues on AKT that are targeted by PTK6, and we demonstrate that tyrosine phosphorylation plays a role in regulating association between PTK6 and AKT. In addition, we show that PTK6 promotes AKT activation and cell proliferation in a Src-independent manner.     

Activation of the PI3K/Akt Pathway Early during Vaccinia and Cowpox Virus Infections Is Required for both Host Survival and Viral Replication

Viral manipulation of the transduction pathways associated with key cellular functions such as actin remodeling, microtubule stabilization, and survival may favor a productive viral infection. Here we show that consistent with the vaccinia virus (VACV) and cowpox virus (CPXV) requirement for cytoskeleton alterations early during the infection cycle, PBK/Akt was phosphorylated at S473 [Akt(S473-P)], a modification associated with the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2), which was paralleled by phosphorylation at T308 [Akt(T308-P)] by PI3K/PDK1, which is required for host survival. Notably, while VACV stimulated Akt(S473-P/T308-P) at early (1 h postinfection [p.i.]) and late (24 h p.i.) times during the infective cycle, CPXV stimulated Akt at early times only. Pharmacological and genetic inhibition of PI3K ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002) or Akt (Akt-X and a dominant-negative form of Akt-K179M) resulted in a significant decline in virus yield (from 80% to ≥90%). This decline was secondary to the inhibition of late viral gene expression, which in turn led to an arrest of virion morphogenesis at the immature-virion stage of the viral growth cycle. Furthermore, the cleavage of both caspase-3 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine nick end labeling assays confirmed that permissive, spontaneously immortalized cells such as A31 cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) underwent apoptosis upon orthopoxvirus infection plus {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002 treatment. Thus, in A31 cells and MEFs, early viral receptor-mediated signals transmitted via the PI3K/Akt pathway are required and precede the expression of viral antiapoptotic genes. Additionally, the inhibition of these signals resulted in the apoptosis of the infected cells and a significant decline in viral titers.The family Poxviridae is a family of large, linear, double-stranded DNA viruses that carry out their entire life cycle within the cytoplasmic compartment of infected cells. Vaccinia virus (VACV) is a prototypical member of the genus Orthopoxvirus, which also includes the closely related cowpox virus (CPXV) (12, 52). The genomes of these viruses are approximately 200 kbp in length, with a coding capacity of approximately 200 genes. The genes involved in virus-host interactions are situated at both ends of the genome and are associated with the evasion of host immune defenses (1). These evasion mechanisms operate mainly extracellularly. For example, the secretion of soluble cytokine and chemokine receptor homologues blocks the receptor recognition by intercepting the cognate cytokine/chemokine in the extracellular environment. This mechanism facilitates viral attachment and entry into cells (1, 70). Therefore, decoy receptors for alpha interferon (IFN-α), IFN-β, IFN-γ, and tumor necrosis factor alpha play an important immunomodulatory role by affecting both the host antiviral and apoptotic responses.To counteract the host proapoptotic response, poxviruses have developed a number of antiapoptotic strategies, including the inhibition of apoptotic signals triggered by the extrinsic pathway (those mediated by death receptors such as tumor necrosis factor and Fas ligand) or the intrinsic pathway (mediated by the mitochondria and triggered upon viral infection) (1, 25, 70, 74). Many studies previously identified viral inhibitors that block specific steps of the intrinsic pathway. These include the VACV-encoded E3L, F1L, and N1L genes and the myxoma virus (MYXV)-encoded M11L gene, which block cytochrome c release (14, 20, 34, 39, 45, 75, 90), and the CPXV-encoded cytokine response modifier gene (CrmA) as well as the VACV-encoded SPI-2 gene, which inhibits both caspase-1 and caspase-8 (25, 58, 61, 74).An emerging body of evidence has also highlighted the pivotal role played by intracellular signaling pathways in Orthopoxvirus biology (18, 48, 92). We and others have shown that poxvirus manipulation of signaling pathways can be virus specific. For example, while both VACV and CPXV stimulate the MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/EGR-1 pathway during a substantial length of time of their infective cycle, the pathway is required only for VACV replication, whereas its role in CPXV biology has yet to be identified (71). MYXV, a rabbit-specific poxvirus, also activates the MEK/ERK pathway in a mouse model of poxvirus-host interactions. However, this stimulation led to the expression of IFN-β, which consequently blocked virus replication and possibly explains why MYXV has such a restricted host range (87).Another signaling molecule associated with viral replication is Akt kinase (also known as protein kinase B). The MYXV host range factor M-T5 is able to reprogram the intracellular environment, thereby increasing human tumor cell permissiveness to viral replication, which is directly associated with levels of phosphorylated Akt (88). In addition, M-T5 is functionally replaced by the host phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) enhancer A protein (92).The transmission of intracellular signals mediated by the serine/threonine kinase Akt to downstream molecules in response to diverse stimuli such as growth factors, insulin, and hormones is dependent upon the phosphorylation of serine 473 (S473-P) and threonine 308 (T308-P). This phosphorylation is mediated by mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2) and phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1), which act as downstream effectors of the PI3K/Akt/mTORC1 pathway (2, 66). PI3Ks are a family of enzymes (classes I to III) that generate lipid second messengers by the phosphorylation of plasma membrane phosphoinositides. Class IA PI3Ks consist of a catalytic subunit (p110, comprising the three isoforms α, β, and δ) and an adaptor/regulatory subunit (p85, comprising the two isoforms α and β) (for a detailed review, see reference 80).The Akt family of proteins is comprised of the three isoforms α, β, and γ, which are composed of an N-terminal pleckstrin homology domain, a central catalytic domain, and a C-terminal hydrophobic domain. Akt is recruited to the plasma membrane through the binding of its pleckstrin homology domain to the phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3), which is a product of PI3K that is anchored to the plasma membrane. PDK1 is also recruited to the plasma membrane through interactions with PIP3. As both PDK1 and Akt interact with PIP3, PDK1 colocalizes with Akt and activates it by phosphorylating threonine 308 (T308-P) (2, 66). Following its activation, Akt phosphorylates a number of downstream substrates such as caspase-9, BAD, glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β), and FKHR. This leads to the suppression of apoptosis, cell growth, survival, and proliferation (11, 16, 56).Another downstream target of PI3K/Akt is mTOR, a serine/threonine kinase that plays a central role in the regulation of cell growth, proliferation, survival, and protein synthesis (26). mTOR kinase has recently been found to be associated with two functionally distinct complexes in mammalian cells, known as mTORC1 and mTORC2 (63, 66). Although these multiprotein complexes share molecules in common, distinct adaptor proteins are recruited into each complex: regulatory-associated protein of TOR (raptor) is recruited into mTORC1, while rapamycin-insensitive companion of TOR (rictor) is recruited into mTORC2 (33, 64). While mTORC1 controls cell growth and protein translation and has proven to be rapamycin sensitive, mTORC2 regulates the actin cytoskeleton and is assumed to be rapamycin insensitive, even though under conditions of prolonged exposure to the drug, it appears to inhibit mTORC2 assembly (29, 64, 65). Additionally, it has been demonstrated that mTORC2 regulates the activity of Akt through the phosphorylation of S473 (S473-P). S473-P appears to be required for the full activation of Akt, since S473-P has been shown to enhance the subsequent phosphorylation of T308 by PDK1 (66, 67, 94). Moreover, the phosphorylation of both S473 and T308 results in a four- to fivefold increase in Akt activity compared to T308-P by PDK1 alone (66).The PI3K/PDK1/Akt(T308)/mTORC1 pathway regulates vital cellular processes that are important for viral replication and propagation, including cell growth, proliferation, and protein translation. This pathway is particularly important for the replication of DNA viruses, as their replication is cap dependent. However, the Akt signaling pathway can also negatively affect viral replication. The stress response downstream of Akt signaling, including hypoxia and energy and amino acid depletion, inhibits mTORC1 (5, 9, 69). Therefore, DNA viruses must overcome these constraints to translate their mRNAs.Pharmacological disruption of the PI3K/Akt pathway with the specific PI3K inhibitor {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002 (2-morpholino-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one) (82) has been reported to not only increase the cleavage of downstream molecules associated with proapoptotic activity [e.g., poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and the executioner caspase-3] (38, 41) but also promote microtubule stabilization, actin filament remodeling/cell migration, and bleb formation/viral infectivity (10, 35, 49, 54, 59).Because the PI3K/Akt and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways influence diverse cellular functions and possibly a healthy antiviral response, usurping these pathways could support an increase in viral replication. In support of this, a number of reports have demonstrated that either the PI3K/Akt or the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway plays a role in the replication of many viruses including flavivirus (38), hepatitis C virus (27), human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (93), human papillomavirus (44, 96), respiratory syncytial virus (77), coxsackievirus B3 (19), Epstein-Barr virus (17, 50, 73), human cytomegalovirus (36, 37, 72), herpes simplex virus type 1 (7, 83), varicella-zoster virus (60), Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (89), adenovirus (55), and simian virus 40 (SV40) (95). With this in mind, we also investigated whether the PI3K/Akt pathway played a pivotal role in orthopoxvirus biology. In this study, we show that the VACV- and CPXV-stimulated PI3K/Akt pathway not only contributes to the prevention of host-cell death but also plays a beneficial role in the viral replication cycle.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Preimplantation Mouse Embryos Depend on Inhibitory Phosphorylation of Separase To Prevent Chromosome Missegregation

Separase is a critical protease that catalyzes the cleavage of sister chromatid cohesins to allow the separation of sister chromatids in the anaphase. Its activity must be inhibited prior to the onset of the anaphase. Two inhibitory mechanisms exist in vertebrates that block the protease activity. One mechanism is through binding and inhibition by securin, and another is phosphorylation on Ser1126 (in humans [Ser1121 in mice]). These two mechanisms are largely redundant. However, phosphorylation on Ser1121 is critical for the prevention of premature sister separation in embryonic germ cells. As a result, Ser1121-to-Ala mutation leads to depletion of germ cells in development and subsequently to infertility in mice. Here, we report that the same mutation also causes embryogenesis failure between the 8- and 16-cell stages in mice. Our results indicate a critical role of separase phosphorylation in germ cell development as well as in early embryogenesis. Thus, deregulation of separase may be a significant contributor to infertility in humans.Sister chromatids are held together by a multisubunit complex called cohesin composed of Smc1 and -3 and Scc1 and -3 (24). To separate the sister chromosomes, cohesin complexes are removed in a two-step process. First, cohesins on chromosome arms are removed by Plk1- and Aurora B-mediated phosphorylation before the anaphase (4, 8, 19, 20, 31, 35). Second, the centromere-localized cohesins, which are protected by Sgo and PP2A from phosphorylation-mediated removal (13, 21, 28, 29, 32), are cleaved by a protease called separase at the onset of the anaphase (33, 34). Prior to the anaphase, separase is inhibited by securin and by phosphorylation, which is most likely catalyzed by cyclin B1/Cdk1. phosphorylation by cyclin B1/Cdk1 per se is not inhibitory to separase. Rather, the phosphorylation allows the binding of cyclin B1/Cdk1 as an inhibitor to separase (5). Two phosphorylation sites in separase, Ser1126 and Thr1326 (Ser1121 and Thr1321 in mice, respectively), that are important for the inhibition have been identified (30). Activation of separase depends on the function of the E3 ubiquitin ligase anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), since both securin and cyclin B1 are substrates of APC/C (1-3, 15, 16, 23, 25, 27, 36). Given that APC/C is inhibited by the spindle assembly checkpoint, separation of sister chromatids therefore cannot occur until the checkpoint is satisfied. Thus, the spindle assembly checkpoint prevents premature sister separation and ensures chromosomal stability.Missegregation of chromosomes has dire consequences. It causes genetic imbalances that may transform cells and lead to cancer development in somatic tissues. In germ lines, missegregation in either meiosis I, mainly manifested as nondisjunction of homologue chromosomes, or meiosis II, manifested as premature sister chromatid separation, will generate aneuploid gametes, directly affecting the fecundity of an organism (26, 37). Although the molecular mechanisms underlying chromosome segregation errors in meiosis are still not clear (6), deregulation of separase, either directly or indirectly, is likely a significant contributor.We previously showed that securin and separase phosphorylation are redundant in almost all somatic tissues, as mice lacking either separase inhibitory mechanism are essentially normal (9, 22). However, phosphorylation of separase is uniquely required during germ line development (9). Mice carrying a nonphosphorylatable separase (S1121A) allele are sterile, largely due to depletion of germ cells during embryogenesis. The failure of the germ cells to reach sexually mature stages in the mutant mice prevented us from assessing the function of the inhibitory phosphorylation of separase in meiosis. Here we report our analysis of mice with an oocyte-specific S1121A mutation in separase. We found that these mice were still infertile. However, the infertility was not a result of meiotic errors caused by the mutant separase but was rather a failure of early embryogenesis of zygotes carrying the mutant allele prior to the 16-cell stage.     

Mcl-1 Integrates the Opposing Actions of Signaling Pathways That Mediate Survival and Apoptosis

Mcl-1 is a member of the Bcl2-related protein family that is a critical mediator of cell survival. Exposure of cells to stress causes inhibition of Mcl-1 mRNA translation and rapid destruction of Mcl-1 protein by proteasomal degradation mediated by a phosphodegron created by glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) phosphorylation of Mcl-1. Here we demonstrate that prior phosphorylation of Mcl-1 by the c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK) is essential for Mcl-1 phosphorylation by GSK3. Stress-induced Mcl-1 degradation therefore requires the coordinated activity of JNK and GSK3. Together, these data establish that Mcl-1 functions as a site of signal integration between the proapoptotic activity of JNK and the prosurvival activity of the AKT pathway that inhibits GSK3.Mcl-1 is an antiapoptotic member of the Bcl2 family. Gene knockout studies of mice demonstrate that Mcl-1 is essential for embryonic development and for the survival of hematopoietic cells (28-30). Studies of the stress response have demonstrated that Mcl-1 plays an important role in the sensitization of cells to apoptotic signals (1, 11, 25). Thus, exposure to UV radiation causes the rapid degradation of Mcl-1 and the release of proapoptotic partner proteins from Mcl-1 complexes (e.g., Bim). The mechanism of rapid Mcl-1 destruction is mediated by the combined actions of two different pathways. First, the exposure to stress causes phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF-2α) on the inhibitory site Ser-51 that prevents translation of Mcl-1 mRNA (1, 11, 25). Second, Mcl-1 is rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin-dependent proteasome pathway (27). Together, these pathways cause a rapid reduction in Mcl-1 expression. This loss of Mcl-1 may be a required initial response for the apoptosis of cells exposed to stress (25).The E3 ubiquitin protein ligase Mule/ARF-BP1 contains a BH3 domain that interacts with Mcl-1 and can initiate ubiquitin-dependent degradation of Mcl-1 (39). Recent studies have demonstrated that rapid stress-induced degradation of Mcl-1 is mediated by an alternative pathway involving the E3 ubiquitin protein ligase β-TrCP, which binds a stress-induced phosphodegron created by the phosphorylation of Mcl-1 by glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) (7, 21). How the exposure to stress causes GSK3-mediated phosphorylation of Mcl-1 is unclear, but GSK3 has been shown to directly phosphorylate Mcl-1 (7, 21). Mcl-1 phosphorylation and degradation may therefore be controlled by the prosurvival AKT pathway, which can negatively regulate GSK3 (7, 21).Mcl-1 is critically involved in the regulation of cell survival and is therefore subject to regulation by multiple mechanisms (26). Thus, Mcl-1 gene expression is regulated by many growth factors and cytokines (26), and Mcl-1 mRNA is regulated by microRNA pathways (24). The Mcl-1 protein is stabilized by binding TCTP (20) and the BH3-only protein Bim (4). In contrast, the BH3-only protein Noxa binds and destabilizes Mcl-1 (4, 36). Moreover, it is established that Mcl-1 is phosphorylated by several protein kinases on sites that may regulate Mcl-1 function. Phosphorylation of human Mcl-1 (hMcl-1) on Ser-64 (a site that is not conserved in other species) may enhance antiapoptotic activity by increasing the interaction of Mcl-1 with Bim, Noxa, and Bak (18). Phosphorylation on Ser-121 and Thr-163 may inhibit the antiapoptotic activity of hMcl-1 (15), and phosphorylation on Thr-163 may increase hMcl-1 protein stability (9). The conserved GSK3 phosphorylation site Ser-159 (and possibly Ser-155) can initiate rapid proteasomal degradation of hMcl-1 (7, 21). Together, these findings suggest that the function of Mcl-1 is very tightly regulated.The results of previous studies have implicated the c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK) in the regulation of Mcl-1 (15, 18). The purpose of this study was to test whether Mcl-1 is a target of signal transduction by JNK. We demonstrate that a key function of JNK is to prime Mcl-1 for phosphorylation by GSK3. JNK is required for GSK3-mediated degradation of Mcl-1 in response to stress. Coordinated regulation of the stress-activated JNK pathway and the AKT-inhibited GSK3 pathway is therefore required for stress-induced Mcl-1 degradation.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.