Chalcones as novel influenza A (H1N1) neuraminidase inhibitors from Glycyrrhiza inflata

The emergence of highly pathogenic influenza A virus strains, such as the new H1N1 swine influenza (novel influenza), represents a serious threat to global human health. During our course of an anti-influenza screening program on natural products, one new licochalcone G (1) and seven known (2-8) chalcones were isolated as active principles from the acetone extract of Glycyrrhiza inflata. Compounds 3 and 6 without prenyl group showed strong inhibitory effects on various neuraminidases from influenza viral strains, H1N1, H9N2, novel H1N1 (WT), and oseltamivir-resistant novel H1N1 (H274Y) expressed in 293T cells. In addition, the efficacy of oseltamivir with the presence of compound 3 (5 μM) was increased against H274Y neuraminidase. This evidence of synergistic effect makes this inhibitor to have a potential possibility for control of pandemic infection by oseltamivir-resistant influenza virus.     

Characterization of Oseltamivir-Resistant 2009 H1N1 Pandemic Influenza A Viruses

Influenza viruses resistant to antiviral drugs emerge frequently. Not surprisingly, the widespread treatment in many countries of patients infected with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) viruses with the neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir has led to the emergence of pandemic strains resistant to these drugs. Sporadic cases of pandemic influenza have been associated with mutant viruses possessing a histidine-to-tyrosine substitution at position 274 (H274Y) in the NA, a mutation known to be responsible for oseltamivir resistance. Here, we characterized in vitro and in vivo properties of two pairs of oseltaimivir-sensitive and -resistant (possessing the NA H274Y substitution) 2009 H1N1 pandemic viruses isolated in different parts of the world. An in vitro NA inhibition assay confirmed that the NA H274Y substitution confers oseltamivir resistance to 2009 H1N1 pandemic viruses. In mouse lungs, we found no significant difference in replication between oseltamivir-sensitive and -resistant viruses. In the lungs of mice treated with oseltamivir or even zanamivir, 2009 H1N1 pandemic viruses with the NA H274Y substitution replicated efficiently. Pathological analysis revealed that the pathogenicities of the oseltamivir-resistant viruses were comparable to those of their oseltamivir-sensitive counterparts in ferrets. Further, the oseltamivir-resistant viruses transmitted between ferrets as efficiently as their oseltamivir-sensitive counterparts. Collectively, these data indicate that oseltamivir-resistant 2009 H1N1 pandemic viruses with the NA H274Y substitution were comparable to their oseltamivir-sensitive counterparts in their pathogenicity and transmissibility in animal models. Our findings highlight the possibility that NA H274Y-possessing oseltamivir-resistant 2009 H1N1 pandemic viruses could supersede oseltamivir-sensitive viruses, as occurred with seasonal H1N1 viruses.     

Triple Combination of Amantadine,Ribavirin, and Oseltamivir Is Highly Active and Synergistic against Drug Resistant Influenza Virus Strains In Vitro

The rapid emergence and subsequent spread of the novel 2009 Influenza A/H1N1 virus (2009 H1N1) has prompted the World Health Organization to declare the first pandemic of the 21^st century, highlighting the threat of influenza to public health and healthcare systems. Widespread resistance to both classes of influenza antivirals (adamantanes and neuraminidase inhibitors) occurs in both pandemic and seasonal viruses, rendering these drugs to be of marginal utility in the treatment modality. Worldwide, virtually all 2009 H1N1 and seasonal H3N2 strains are resistant to the adamantanes (rimantadine and amantadine), and the majority of seasonal H1N1 strains are resistant to oseltamivir, the most widely prescribed neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI). To address the need for more effective therapy, we evaluated the in vitro activity of a triple combination antiviral drug (TCAD) regimen composed of drugs with different mechanisms of action against drug-resistant seasonal and 2009 H1N1 influenza viruses. Amantadine, ribavirin, and oseltamivir, alone and in combination, were tested against amantadine- and oseltamivir-resistant influenza A viruses using an in vitro infection model in MDCK cells. Our data show that the triple combination was highly synergistic against drug-resistant viruses, and the synergy of the triple combination was significantly greater than the synergy of any double combination tested (P<0.05), including the combination of two NAIs. Surprisingly, amantadine and oseltamivir contributed to the antiviral activity of the TCAD regimen against amantadine- and oseltamivir-resistant viruses, respectively, at concentrations where they had no activity as single agents, and at concentrations that were clinically achievable. Our data demonstrate that the TCAD regimen composed of amantadine, ribavirin, and oseltamivir is highly synergistic against resistant viruses, including 2009 H1N1. The TCAD regimen overcomes baseline drug resistance to both classes of approved influenza antivirals, and thus may represent a highly active antiviral therapy for seasonal and pandemic influenza.     

Efficacy of the New Neuraminidase Inhibitor CS-8958 against H5N1 Influenza Viruses

Currently, two neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors, oseltamivir and zanamivir, which must be administrated twice daily for 5 days for maximum therapeutic effect, are licensed for the treatment of influenza. However, oseltamivir-resistant mutants of seasonal H1N1 and highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza A viruses have emerged. Therefore, alternative antiviral agents are needed. Recently, a new neuraminidase inhibitor, R-125489, and its prodrug, CS-8958, have been developed. CS-8958 functions as a long-acting NA inhibitor in vivo (mice) and is efficacious against seasonal influenza strains following a single intranasal dose. Here, we tested the efficacy of this compound against H5N1 influenza viruses, which have spread across several continents and caused epidemics with high morbidity and mortality. We demonstrated that R-125489 interferes with the NA activity of H5N1 viruses, including oseltamivir-resistant and different clade strains. A single dose of CS-8958 (1,500 µg/kg) given to mice 2 h post-infection with H5N1 influenza viruses produced a higher survival rate than did continuous five-day administration of oseltamivir (50 mg/kg twice daily). Virus titers in lungs and brain were substantially lower in infected mice treated with a single dose of CS-8958 than in those treated with the five-day course of oseltamivir. CS-8958 was also highly efficacious against highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus and oseltamivir-resistant variants. A single dose of CS-8958 given seven days prior to virus infection also protected mice against H5N1 virus lethal infection. To evaluate the improved efficacy of CS-8958 over oseltamivir, the binding stability of R-125489 to various subtypes of influenza virus was assessed and compared with that of other NA inhibitors. We found that R-125489 bound to NA more tightly than did any other NA inhibitor tested. Our results indicate that CS-8958 is highly effective for the treatment and prophylaxis of infection with H5N1 influenza viruses, including oseltamivir-resistant mutants.     

Heterosubtypic antibody response elicited with seasonal influenza vaccine correlates partial protection against highly pathogenic H5N1 virus

Background

The spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus in human remains a global health concern. Heterosubtypic antibody response between seasonal influenza vaccine and potential pandemic influenza virus has important implications for public health. Previous studies by Corti et al. and by Gioia et al. demonstrate that heterosubtypic neutralizing antibodies against the highly pathogenic H5N1 virus can be elicited with a seasonal influenza vaccine in humans. However, whether such response offers immune protection against highly pathogenic H5N1 virus remained to be determined.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In this study, using a sensitive influenza HA (hemagglutinin) and NA (neuraminidase) pseudotype-based neutralization (PN) assay we first confirmed that low levels of heterosubtypic neutralizing antibody response against H5N1 virus were indeed elicited with seasonal influenza vaccine in humans. We then immunized mice with the seasonal influenza vaccine and challenged them with lethal doses of highly pathogenic H5N1 virus. As controls, we immunized mice with homosubtypic H5N1 virus like particles (VLP) or PBS and challenged them with the same H5N1 virus. Here we show that low levels of heterosubtypic neutralizing antibody response were elicited with seasonal influenza vaccine in mice, which were significantly higher than those in PBS control. Among them 2 out of 27 whose immune sera exhibited similar levels of neutralizing antibody response as VLP controls actually survived from highly pathogenic H5N1 virus challenge.

Conclusions/Significance

Therefore, we conclude that low levels of heterosubtypic neutralizing antibody response are indeed elicited with seasonal influenza vaccine in humans and mice and at certain levels such response offers immune protection against severity of H5N1 virus infection.     

Detection of Extensive Cross-Neutralization between Pandemic and Seasonal A/H1N1 Influenza Viruses Using a Pseudotype Neutralization Assay

Background

Cross-immunity between seasonal and pandemic A/H1N1 influenza viruses remains uncertain. In particular, the extent that previous infection or vaccination by seasonal A/H1N1 viruses can elicit protective immunity against pandemic A/H1N1 is unclear.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Neutralizing titers against seasonal A/H1N1 (A/Brisbane/59/2007) and against pandemic A/H1N1 (A/California/04/2009) were measured using an HIV-1-based pseudovirus neutralization assay. Using this highly sensitive assay, we found that a large fraction of subjects who had never been exposed to pandemic A/H1N1 express high levels of pandemic A/H1N1 neutralizing titers. A significant correlation was seen between neutralization of pandemic A/H1N1 and neutralization of a standard seasonal A/H1N1 strain. Significantly higher pandemic A/H1N1 neutralizing titers were measured in subjects who had received vaccination against seasonal influenza in 2008–2009. Higher pandemic neutralizing titers were also measured in subjects over 60 years of age.

Conclusions/Significance

Our findings reveal that the extent of protective cross-immunity between seasonal and pandemic A/H1N1 influenza viruses may be more important than previously estimated. This cross-immunity could provide a possible explanation of the relatively mild profile of the recent influenza pandemic.     

A contributing role for anti-neuraminidase antibodies on immunity to pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza A virus

Background

Exposure to contemporary seasonal influenza A viruses affords partial immunity to pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza A virus (pH1N1) infection. The impact of antibodies to the neuraminidase (NA) of seasonal influenza A viruses to cross-immunity against pH1N1 infection is unknown.

Methods and Results

Antibodies to the NA of different seasonal H1N1 influenza strains were tested for cross-reactivity against A/California/04/09 (pH1N1). A panel of reverse genetic (rg) recombinant viruses was generated containing 7 genes of the H1N1 influenza strain A/Puerto Rico/08/34 (PR8) and the NA gene of either the pandemic H1N1 2009 strain (pH1N1) or one of the following contemporary seasonal H1N1 strains: A/Solomon/03/06 (rg Solomon) or A/Brisbane/59/07 (rg Brisbane). Convalescent sera collected from mice infected with recombinant viruses were measured for cross-reactive antibodies to pH1N1 via Hemagglutinin Inhibition (HI) or Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The ectodomain of a recombinant NA protein from the pH1N1 strain (pNA-ecto) was expressed, purified and used in ELISA to measure cross-reactive antibodies. Analysis of sera from elderly humans immunized with trivalent split-inactivated influenza (TIV) seasonal vaccines prior to 2009 revealed considerable cross-reactivity to pNA-ecto. High titers of cross-reactive antibodies were detected in mice inoculated with either rg Solomon or rg Brisbane. Convalescent sera from mice inoculated with recombinant viruses were used to immunize naïve recipient Balb/c mice by passive transfer prior to challenge with pH1N1. Mice receiving rg California sera were better protected than animals receiving rg Solomon or rg Brisbane sera.

Conclusions

The NA of contemporary seasonal H1N1 influenza strains induces a cross-reactive antibody response to pH1N1 that correlates with reduced lethality from pH1N1 challenge, albeit less efficiently than anti-pH1N1 NA antibodies. These findings demonstrate that seasonal NA antibodies contribute to but are not sufficient for cross-reactive immunity to pH1N1.     

Competitive Fitness of Oseltamivir-Sensitive and -Resistant Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Viruses in a Ferret Model

The fitness of oseltamivir-resistant highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses has important clinical implications. We generated recombinant human A/Vietnam/1203/04 (VN; clade 1) and A/Turkey/15/06 (TK; clade 2.2) influenza viruses containing the H274Y neuraminidase (NA) mutation, which confers resistance to NA inhibitors, and compared the fitness levels of the wild-type (WT) and resistant virus pairs in ferrets. The VN-H274Y and VN-WT viruses replicated to similar titers in the upper respiratory tract (URT) and caused comparable disease signs, and none of the animals survived. On days 1 to 3 postinoculation, disease signs caused by oseltamivir-resistant TK-H274Y virus were milder than those caused by TK-WT virus, and all animals survived. We then studied fitness by using a novel approach. We coinoculated ferrets with different ratios of oseltamivir-resistant and -sensitive H5N1 viruses and measured the proportion of clones in day-6 nasal washes that contained the H274Y NA mutation. Although the proportion of VN-H274Y clones increased consistently, that of TK-H274Y virus decreased. Mutations within NA catalytic (R292K) and framework (E119A/K, I222L, H274L, and N294S) sites or near the NA enzyme active site (V116I, I117T/V, Q136H, K150N, and A250T) emerged spontaneously (without drug pressure) in both pairs of viruses. The NA substitutions I254V and E276A could exert a compensatory effect on the fitness of VN-H274Y and TK-H274Y viruses. NA enzymatic function was reduced in both drug-resistant H5N1 viruses. These results show that the H274Y NA mutation affects the fitness of two H5N1 influenza viruses differently. Our novel method of assessing viral fitness accounts for both virus-host interactions and virus-virus interactions within the host.The neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors (orally administered oseltamivir and inhaled zanamivir) are currently an important class of antiviral drugs available for the treatment of seasonal and pandemic influenza. Although administration of NA inhibitors may significantly reduce influenza virus transmission, it risks the emergence of drug-resistant variants (16, 32). The impact of drug resistance would depend on the fitness (i.e., infectivity in vitro and virulence and transmissibility in vivo) of the resistant virus. If the resistance mutation only modestly reduces the virus'' biological fitness and does not impair its replication efficiency and transmissibility, the effectiveness of antiviral treatment can be significantly impaired. The unexpected natural emergence and spread of oseltamivir-resistant variants (carrying the H274Y NA amino acid substitution) among seasonal H1N1 influenza viruses of the A/Brisbane/59/07 lineage demonstrated that drug-resistant viruses can be highly fit and transmissible in humans (11, 22, 29), although the fitness of these variants is not completely understood. They are hypothesized to have lower NA receptor affinity and more-optimal NA and hemagglutinin (HA) functional balance than do wild-type (WT) viruses (38). Fortunately, oseltamivir-resistant variants have rarely been reported to occur among the novel pandemic H1N1 influenza viruses that emerged in April 2009; therefore, initial data suggest that currently circulating wild-type viruses possibly possess greater fitness than drug-resistant viruses (45), although only retrospective epidemiological data can provide a conclusive answer. The key questions are whether the risk posed by NA inhibitor-resistant viruses can be assessed experimentally and what the most reliable approach may be.All NA inhibitor-resistant influenza viruses characterized to date have contained specific mutations in the NA molecule. Clinically derived drug-resistant viruses have carried mutations that are NA subtype specific and differ in accordance with the NA inhibitor used (12, 35). The most commonly observed mutations are H274Y and N294S in the influenza A N1 NA subtype, E119A/G/D/V and R292K in the N2 NA subtype, and R152K and D198N in influenza B viruses (35, 36). The fitness of NA inhibitor-resistant viruses has been studied in vitro and in vivo. Many groups have assessed their replicative capacity in MDCK cells, but this assay system can yield anomalous results (49), particularly in the case of low-passage clinical isolates. The mismatch between virus specificity and cellular receptors can be overcome by using cell lines engineered to express human-like α-2,6-linked sialyl cell surface receptors (MDCK-SIAT1) (15, 34) or a novel cell culture-based system that morphologically and functionally recapitulates differentiated normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells (24). Investigations in vivo typically compare replication efficiencies, clinical signs, and transmissibility levels between oseltamivir-resistant viruses and the corresponding wild-type virus. Initial studies found that NA inhibitor-resistant influenza viruses were severely compromised in vitro and in animal models (6, 17, 26) and thus led to the idea that resistant viruses will unlikely have an impact on epidemic and pandemic influenza. However, clinically derived H1N1 virus with the H274Y NA mutation (18) and reverse genetics-derived H3N2 virus with the E119V NA mutation (46) were subsequently found to possess biological fitness and transmissibility similar to those of drug-sensitive virus in direct-contact ferrets. Recent studies in a guinea pig model showed that recombinant human H3N2 influenza viruses carrying either a single E119V NA mutation or the double NA mutation E119V-I222V were transmitted efficiently by direct contact but not by aerosol (5).There is limited information about the fitness of NA inhibitor-resistant H5N1 influenza viruses. Although they are not efficiently transmitted from human to human, their pandemic potential remains a serious public health concern because of their virulence in humans (1, 4, 7). H5N1 viruses isolated from untreated patients are susceptible to the NA inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir (21), although oseltamivir-resistant variants with the H274Y NA mutation have been reported to occur in five patients after (9, 30) or before (41) treatment with oseltamivir. The World Health Organization reported the isolation of two oseltamivir-resistant H5N1 viruses from an Egyptian girl and her uncle (44) after oseltamivir treatment. The virus was moderately resistant and possessed an N294S NA mutation. Preliminary evidence suggests that the resistance mutation existed before transmission of the virus from birds to the patients and thus before initiation of treatment (41). We previously showed that wild-type A/Vietnam/1203/04 (H5N1) influenza virus and recombinants carrying either the H274Y or the N294S NA mutation reached comparable titers in MDCK and MDCK-SIAT1 cells and caused comparable mortality rates among BALB/c mice (48). In contrast, clinically derived A/Hanoi/30408/05 (H5N1) influenza virus with the H274Y NA mutation reproduced to lower titers than the oseltamivir-sensitive virus in the lungs of inoculated ferrets (30).In a ferret model, we compared the fitness levels of two pairs of H5N1 viruses in the absence of selective drug pressure. One virus of each pair was the wild type, while the other carried the H274Y NA mutation conferring oseltamivir resistance. The two viruses used, A/Vietnam/1203/04 (HA clade 1) and A/Turkey/15/06 (HA clade 2.2), differ in their pathogenicity to ferrets. Virus fitness was evaluated by two approaches. Using the traditional approach, we compared clinical disease signs, relative inactivity indexes, weight and temperature changes, and virus replication levels in the upper respiratory tract (URT). We then used a novel competitive fitness approach in which we genetically analyzed individual virus clones after coinfection of ferrets with mixtures of oseltamivir-sensitive and -resistant H5N1 viruses; thus, we determined virus-virus interactions within the host. We observed no difference between the resistant and sensitive virus of each pair in clinical signs or virus replication in the URT; however, analysis of virus-virus interactions within the host showed that the H274Y NA mutation affected the fitness of the two viruses differently. The oseltamivir-resistant A/Vietnam/1203/04-like virus outgrew its wild-type counterpart, while the oseltamivir-resistant A/Turkey/15/06-like virus showed less fitness than its wild-type counterpart.     

Immune protection induced on day 10 following administration of the 2009 A/H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine

Background

The 2009 swine-origin influenza virus (S-OIV) H1N1 pandemic has caused more than 18,000 deaths worldwide. Vaccines against the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza virus are useful for preventing infection and controlling the pandemic. The kinetics of the immune response following vaccination with the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza vaccine need further investigation.

Methodology/Principal Findings

58 volunteers were vaccinated with a 2009 A/H1N1 pandemic influenza monovalent split-virus vaccine (15 µg, single-dose). The sera were collected before Day 0 (pre-vaccination) and on Days 3, 5, 10, 14, 21, 30, 45 and 60 post vaccination. Specific antibody responses induced by the vaccination were analyzed using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). After administration of the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza vaccine, specific and protective antibody response with a major subtype of IgG was sufficiently developed as early as Day 10 (seroprotection rate: 93%). This specific antibody response could maintain for at least 60 days without significant reduction. Antibody response induced by the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza vaccine could not render protection against seasonal H1N1 influenza (seroconversion rate: 3% on Day 21). However, volunteers with higher pre-existing seasonal influenza antibody levels (pre-vaccination HI titer ≥1∶40, Group 1) more easily developed a strong antibody protection effect against the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza vaccine as compared with those showing lower pre-existing seasonal influenza antibody levels (pre-vaccination HI titer <1∶40, Group 2). The titer of the specific antibody against the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza was much higher in Group 1 (geometric mean titer: 146 on Day 21) than that in Group 2 (geometric mean titer: 70 on Day 21).

Conclusions/Significance

Recipients could gain sufficient protection as early as 10 days after vaccine administration. The protection could last at least 60 days. Individuals with a stronger pre-existing seasonal influenza antibody response may have a relatively higher potential for developing a stronger humoral immune response after vaccination with the 2009 A/H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine.     

Protection from the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic Influenza by an Antibody from Combinatorial Survivor-Based Libraries

Influenza viruses elude immune responses and antiviral chemotherapeutics through genetic drift and reassortment. As a result, the development of new strategies that attack a highly conserved viral function to prevent and/or treat influenza infection is being pursued. Such novel broadly acting antiviral therapies would be less susceptible to virus escape and provide a long lasting solution to the evolving virus challenge. Here we report the in vitro and in vivo activity of a human monoclonal antibody (A06) against two isolates of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus. This antibody, which was obtained from a combinatorial library derived from a survivor of highly pathogenic H5N1 infection, neutralizes H5N1, seasonal H1N1 and 2009 “Swine” H1N1 pandemic influenza in vitro with similar potency and is capable of preventing and treating 2009 H1N1 influenza infection in murine models of disease. These results demonstrate broad activity of the A06 antibody and its utility as an anti-influenza treatment option, even against newly evolved influenza strains to which there is limited immunity in the general population.     

Assessing the Viral Fitness of Oseltamivir-Resistant Influenza Viruses in Ferrets,Using a Competitive-Mixtures Model

To determine the relative fitness of oseltamivir-resistant strains compared to susceptible wild-type viruses, we combined mathematical modeling and statistical techniques with a novel in vivo “competitive-mixtures” experimental model. Ferrets were coinfected with either pure populations (100% susceptible wild-type or 100% oseltamivir-resistant mutant virus) or mixed populations of wild-type and oseltamivir-resistant influenza viruses (80%:20%, 50%:50%, and 20%:80%) at equivalent infectivity titers, and the changes in the relative proportions of those two viruses were monitored over the course of the infection during within-host and over host-to-host transmission events in a ferret contact model. Coinfection of ferrets with mixtures of an oseltamivir-resistant R292K mutant A(H3N2) virus and a R292 oseltamivir-susceptible wild-type virus demonstrated that the R292K mutant virus was rapidly outgrown by the R292 wild-type virus in artificially infected donor ferrets and did not transmit to any of the recipient ferrets. The competitive-mixtures model was also used to investigate the fitness of the seasonal A(H1N1) oseltamivir-resistant H274Y mutant and showed that within infected ferrets the H274Y mutant virus was marginally outgrown by the wild-type strain but demonstrated equivalent transmissibility between ferrets. This novel in vivo experimental method and accompanying mathematical analysis provide greater insight into the relative fitness, both within the host and between hosts, of two different influenza virus strains compared to more traditional methods that infect ferrets with only pure populations of viruses. Our statistical inferences are essential for the development of the next generation of mathematical models of the emergence and spread of oseltamivir-resistant influenza in human populations.The neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors are a class of influenza antiviral drugs that are specifically designed to inhibit the enzymatic function of the NA, thereby preventing normal viral replication. Since 1999, two NA inhibitors (NAIs), oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza), have been shown to be effective for the treatment and prophylaxis of patients infected with not only seasonal influenza, but also highly pathogenic A(H5N1) and the newly emerged A(H1N1) pandemic virus. Prior to 2007, resistance to this class of drugs was considered relatively uncommon, particularly in comparison with the other class of influenza antivirals, the adamantanes, which readily select for viral resistance in treated patients. During early clinical trials, oseltamivir resistance was detected in only 1 to 2% of adults (14) and 5 to 6% of children (33) under treatment, although later studies detected resistance in up to 18% of oseltamivir-treated children (16). In contrast, resistance following zanamivir treatment is rare, with only one reported case observed in an immunocompromised patient (6). Influenza viruses that develop resistance to these drugs typically contain mutations in the NA which, either directly or indirectly, alter the shape of the NA enzymatic site, thereby reducing the ability of the drugs to bind to this specific pocket. One of the most commonly observed mutations in oseltamivir-resistant A(H3N2) viruses is an arginine-to-lysine mutation at residue 292 (R292K) of the NA, while the predominant NA mutation in oseltamivir-resistant A(H1N1) viruses is a histidine-to-tyrosine mutation at residue 274 (H274Y) (N2 NA amino acid numbering, equivalent to residue 275 based on N1 numbering). Both of these mutations have an indirect impact on drug binding, as they affect the ability of the glutamic acid residue at position 276 to reorientate, as required for slow binding by oseltamivir (3). Many mutations that cause NAI resistance also cause reduced NA enzyme activity and, consequently, can compromise viral fitness.Previous studies have demonstrated that viruses with an R292K NA mutation demonstrated compromised growth in vitro (36) and in ferrets were significantly less infectious and did not transmit (9). The replication and transmission fitness of the H274Y mutation has also been studied previously. An H274Y mutant A(H1N1) strain isolated from a patient under oseltamivir treatment demonstrated compromised growth in cell culture compared to a wild-type (WT) virus (13), although a strain carrying the same mutation selected in vitro was found to replicate as well as the wild type (32). The infectivity and transmissibility of an H274Y mutant were found to be restricted in ferrets (13), although a second study demonstrated that transmission of the mutant virus between ferrets was possible, but required a greater viral dose of the mutant compared to the wild type (10). These results suggest that resistant virus variants with the same NA mutation may differ in replication or transmission fitness depending on other viral components. Nevertheless, based on these data and the viral fitness of other resistant mutants, it was believed that NAI-resistant viruses were unlikely to spread throughout the community due to their compromised viral fitness in the absence of drug selective pressure. This was proven incorrect during the Northern Hemisphere 2007-2008 influenza season, when large numbers of oseltamivir-resistant seasonal A(H1N1) viruses with an H274Y mutation were detected in patients who had not been treated with oseltamivir (4, 24). The mutant strain continued to spread to the Southern Hemisphere, such that by late 2008 virtually all circulating seasonal A(H1N1) viruses were oseltamivir resistant (11). The rapid global spread of this strain clearly suggested that the oseltamivir-resistant seasonal A(H1N1) virus had fitness equivalent to or greater than that of the previous oseltamivir-sensitive A(H1N1) strain. The reasons for enhanced viral fitness in this strain, when previous studies demonstrated that the acquisition of an H274Y mutation led to reduced viral fitness, remain unclear but probably involve compensatory mutations or reassortment events which may have improved the hemagglutinin (HA)/NA balance, allowing efficient transmission (5, 26).Experimental methods have been developed to assess the relative fitness of NAI-resistant strains compared with respective wild-type viruses, both in vitro and in vivo. Ferrets have been considered the most appropriate model animal for influenza research, and fitness studies have assessed variables such as minimum dose required to achieve infection, duration of viral shedding, and levels of viral load to allow comparisons between viruses. The guinea pig model has also been previously used to assess the viral fitness of influenza viruses, particularly in comparing the transmissibility of strains via either the contact or aerosol route (2). As an alternative to these traditional approaches, we have investigated a methodology that involves coinfection of ferrets with a mixture of two influenza viruses. Daily monitoring of changes in the relative proportion of those viruses over the course of the infection allows determination of the relative replication fitness of the viruses. Monitoring of recipient ferrets exposed to the infected ferrets enables the relative transmissibility of the viruses (henceforth, the relative transmission fitness) to be determined. In this study, the “competitive-mixtures” methodology was used to assess the relative replication and transmission fitness of an oseltamivir-resistant R292K mutant A(H3N2) virus compared with an oseltamivir-sensitive A(H3N2) wild-type strain and also to asses the relative replication and transmission fitness of an oseltamivir-resistant H274Y seasonal A(H1N1) mutant compared with an oseltamivir-sensitive A(H1N1) wild-type strain. Quantitative estimates for the replication fitness of mutant viruses were determined using a simple mathematical model of within-host viral replication and mixed-effects statistical tests. Transmission fitness was evaluated by application of a graphical technique that demonstrated the relationship between the proportion of mutant virus in the infectee ferrets as a function of the proportion of mutant virus in the infector ferrets.Inferences drawn from the statistical analyses presented here are essential for the refinement of existing mathematical models that simulate the spread of influenza in the human population and model the deployment of antiviral agents. These models are designed to assess the likely impact of different antiviral agent deployment strategies to control pandemic influenza (18, 21, 35). At present, data on the probability of emergence of NAI-resistant strains, the relative transmission fitness of these strains, and the probability of an individual''s infection reverting to an NAI-sensitive strain in the absence of ongoing selective pressure are severely limited. In consequence, human population-level models of influenza spread must make gross assumptions on the likely characteristics of NAI-resistant strains. Data such as those presented here will be used to inform new models of drug deployment and result in improved pandemic policy advice (20, 23).     

Characterization of the 2009 Pandemic A/Beijing/501/2009 H1N1 Influenza Strain in Human Airway Epithelial Cells and Ferrets

Background

A novel 2009 swine-origin influenza A H1N1 virus (S-OIV H1N1) has been transmitted among humans worldwide. However, the pathogenesis of this virus in human airway epithelial cells and mammals is not well understood.

Methodology/Principal Finding

In this study, we showed that a 2009 A (H1N1) influenza virus strain, A/Beijing/501/2009, isolated from a human patient, caused typical influenza-like symptoms including weight loss, fluctuations in body temperature, and pulmonary pathological changes in ferrets. We demonstrated that the human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cell line A549 was susceptible to infection and that the infected cells underwent apoptosis at 24 h post-infection. In contrast to the seasonal H1N1 influenza virus, the 2009 A (H1N1) influenza virus strain A/Beijing/501/2009 induced more cell death involving caspase-3-dependent apoptosis in A549 cells. Additionally, ferrets infected with the A/Beijing/501/2009 H1N1 virus strain exhibited increased body temperature, greater weight loss, and higher viral titers in the lungs. Therefore, the A/Beijing/501/2009 H1N1 isolate successfully infected the lungs of ferrets and caused more pathological lesions than the seasonal influenza virus. Our findings demonstrate that the difference in virulence of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus and the seasonal H1N1 influenza virus in vitro and in vivo may have been mediated by different mechanisms.

Conclusion/Significance

Our understanding of the pathogenesis of the 2009 A (H1N1) influenza virus infection in both humans and animals is broadened by our findings that apoptotic cell death is involved in the cytopathic effect observed in vitro and that the pathological alterations in the lungs of S-OIV H1N1-infected ferrets are much more severe.     

Oseltamivir-Resistant Variants of the 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Influenza A Virus Are Not Attenuated in the Guinea Pig and Ferret Transmission Models

Oseltamivir is routinely used worldwide for the treatment of severe influenza A virus infection, and should drug-resistant pandemic 2009 H1N1 viruses become widespread, this potent defense strategy might fail. Oseltamivir-resistant variants of the pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus have been detected in a substantial number of patients, but to date, the mutant viruses have not moved into circulation in the general population. It is not known whether the resistance mutations in viral neuraminidase (NA) reduce viral fitness. We addressed this question by studying transmission of oseltamivir-resistant mutants derived from two different isolates of the pandemic H1N1 virus in both the guinea pig and ferret transmission models. In vitro, the virus readily acquired a single histidine-to-tyrosine mutation at position 275 (H275Y) in viral neuraminidase when serially passaged in cell culture with increasing concentrations of oseltamivir. This mutation conferred a high degree of resistance to oseltamivir but not zanamivir. Unexpectedly, in guinea pigs and ferrets, the fitness of viruses with the H275Y point mutation was not detectably impaired, and both wild-type and mutant viruses were transmitted equally well from animals that were initially inoculated with 1:1 virus mixtures to naïve contacts. In contrast, a reassortant virus containing an oseltamivir-resistant seasonal NA in the pandemic H1N1 background showed decreased transmission efficiency and fitness in the guinea pig model. Our data suggest that the currently circulating pandemic 2009 H1N1 virus has a high potential to acquire drug resistance without losing fitness.Oseltamivir resistance was rare until 2008, when resistant seasonal H1N1 viruses were found circulating in the general Scandinavian population (15). Soon after, studies from other countries in Europe also reported the isolation of oseltamivir-resistant viruses, and eventually, oseltamivir resistance was recognized as a global phenomenon (9, 27). Prior to 2008, resistant viruses were primarily isolated from patients with nonresponsive influenza virus infections or from infected patients who received a low-dose prophylaxis regiment prior to symptom onset. At the time, these resistant isolates accounted for 1% of the circulating H1N1 virus. Drug resistance mutations were identified during oseltamivir development, including a histidine-to-tyrosine mutation at position 275 (H275Y) in N1 neuraminidase (NA). This mutation in particular was shown to attenuate virus growth and pathology in ferrets (17). Additionally, oseltamivir-resistant viruses with a nearby mutation in N2 neuraminidase transmitted less efficiently than oseltamivir-sensitive viruses in the guinea pig transmission model (4). Surprisingly, the seasonal 2008 H1N1 viral isolates that spread around the world had the same tyrosine mutation, which was previously associated with iatrogenic infections and attenuation. Furthermore, epidemiological studies concluded that this resistant virus developed independently of drug selection, suggesting that compensatory adaptations allowed an attenuating mutation to become permissible (3, 18). The ability of resistant 2008 isolates to perform on par with nonresistant 2008 isolates in growth curves, in mean plaque size, and in a transmission model was recently confirmed (2). Currently, 99% of seasonal H1N1 viruses are oseltamivir resistant; however, the prevalence of these viruses is very low due to replacement by a novel reassortant H1N1 virus (6, 8). This novel reassortant was originally identified in Mexico by doctors concerned about a jump in the number of influenza cases during the month of March in 2009 (7). Later referred to as swine-origin influenza virus, novel H1N1 virus, or 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus, this virus would continue to efficiently transmit around the world, even during the summer months of the northern hemisphere. Its robust transmission was later confirmed in aerosol transmission models, in which 86% of ferrets and 100% of guinea pigs exposed to infected animals contracted pandemic influenza (22, 28, 31). Oseltamivir was used broadly during the outbreak, treating those with complications and prophylactically treating close contacts of confirmed cases. The use of oseltamivir in this manner provided ample opportunity for oseltamivir-resistant viruses to develop. More than 225 cases of oseltamivir-resistant infections have been confirmed from the beginning of the pandemic, including four incidents of suspected aerosol transmission (21, 32, 33). Fortunately, these clinical isolates never progressed into stable transmission in the general public. This study seeks to evaluate if introducing the H275Y mutation into the pandemic 2009 H1N1 virus attenuates virus replication in vitro or in vivo using the guinea pig model and the ferret model to test aerosol transmission efficiency. Furthermore, this study evaluates if a reassortant between the circulating novel H1N1 virus and seasonal neuraminidase (NA) forms a well-adapted, resistant virus capable of efficient transmission.Currently, oseltamivir is the drug of choice for treating novel H1N1 complications and outpatient prophylaxis. Therefore, it is of great importance to study the in vitro replication and transmission phenotypes of oseltamivir-resistant novel H1N1 viruses to understand why broad oseltamivir resistance has not occurred or whether we should expect it to occur in the future.     

Complex patterns of human antisera reactivity to novel 2009 H1N1 and historical H1N1 influenza strains

Background

During the 2009 influenza pandemic, individuals over the age of 60 had the lowest incidence of infection with approximately 25% of these people having pre-existing, cross-reactive antibodies to novel 2009 H1N1 influenza isolates. It was proposed that older people had pre-existing antibodies induced by previous 1918-like virus infection(s) that cross-reacted to novel H1N1 strains.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Using antisera collected from a cohort of individuals collected before the second wave of novel H1N1 infections, only a minority of individuals with 1918 influenza specific antibodies also demonstrated hemagglutination-inhibition activity against the novel H1N1 influenza. In this study, we examined human antisera collected from individuals that ranged between the ages of 1 month and 90 years to determine the profile of seropositive influenza immunity to viruses representing H1N1 antigenic eras over the past 100 years. Even though HAI titers to novel 2009 H1N1 and the 1918 H1N1 influenza viruses were positively associated, the association was far from perfect, particularly for the older and younger age groups.

Conclusions/Significance

Therefore, there may be a complex set of immune responses that are retained in people infected with seasonal H1N1 that can contribute to the reduced rates of H1N1 influenza infection in older populations.     

Evaluation of In Vitro Cross-Reactivity to Avian H5N1 and Pandemic H1N1 2009 Influenza Following Prime Boost Regimens of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in Healthy Human Subjects: A Randomised Trial

Introduction

Recent studies have demonstrated that inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines (IIV) may elicit production of heterosubtypic antibodies, which can neutralize avian H5N1 virus in a small proportion of subjects. We hypothesized that prime boost regimens of live and inactivated trivalent seasonal influenza vaccines (LAIV and IIV) would enhance production of heterosubtypic immunity and provide evidence of cross-protection against other influenza viruses.

Methods

In an open-label study, 26 adult volunteers were randomized to receive one of four vaccine regimens containing two doses of 2009-10 seasonal influenza vaccines administered 8 (±1) weeks apart: 2 doses of LAIV; 2 doses of IIV; LAIV then IIV; IIV then LAIV. Humoral immunity assays for avian H5N1, 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1), and seasonal vaccine strains were performed on blood collected pre-vaccine and 2 and 4 weeks later. The percentage of cytokine-producing T-cells was compared with baseline 14 days after each dose.

Results

Subjects receiving IIV had prompt serological responses to vaccine strains. Two subjects receiving heterologous prime boost regimens had enhanced haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and neutralization (NT) titres against pH1N1, and one subject against avian H5N1; all three had pre-existing cross-reactive antibodies detected at baseline. Significantly elevated titres to H5N1 and pH1N1 by neuraminidase inhibition (NI) assay were observed following LAIV-IIV administration. Both vaccines elicited cross-reactive CD4+ T-cell responses to nucleoprotein of avian H5N1 and pH1N1. All regimens were safe and well tolerated.

Conclusion

Neither homologous nor heterologous prime boost immunization enhanced serum HI and NT titres to 2009 pH1N1 or avian H5N1 compared to single dose vaccine. However heterologous prime-boost vaccination did lead to in vitro evidence of cross-reactivity by NI; the significance of this finding is unclear. These data support the strategy of administering single dose trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine at the outset of an influenza pandemic while a specific vaccine is being developed.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01044095","term_id":"NCT01044095"}}NCT01044095     

Diagnostic Approach for the Differentiation of the Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1)v Virus from Recent Human Influenza Viruses by Real-Time PCR

Background

The current spread of pandemic influenza A(H1N1)v virus necessitates an intensified surveillance of influenza virus infections worldwide. So far, in many laboratories routine diagnostics were limited to generic influenza virus detection only. To provide interested laboratories with real-time PCR assays for type and subtype identification, we present a bundle of PCR assays with which any human influenza A and B virus can be easily identified, including assays for the detection of the pandemic A(H1N1)v virus.

Principal Findings

The assays show optimal performance characteristics in their validation on plasmids containing the respective assay target sequences. All assays have furthermore been applied to several thousand clinical samples since 2007 (assays for seasonal influenza) and April 2009 (pandemic influenza assays), respectively, and showed excellent results also on clinical material.

Conclusions

We consider the presented assays to be well suited for the detection and subtyping of circulating influenza viruses.     

Impact of the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic on Age-Specific Epidemic Curves of Other Respiratory Viruses: A Comparison of Pre-Pandemic,Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Periods in a Subtropical City

Background

The 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic caused offseason peaks in temperate regions but coincided with the summer epidemic of seasonal influenza and other common respiratory viruses in subtropical Hong Kong. This study was aimed to investigate the impact of the pandemic on age-specific epidemic curves of other respiratory viruses.

Methods

Weekly laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza A (subtypes seasonal A(H1N1), A(H3N2), pandemic virus A(H1N1)pdm09), influenza B, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus and parainfluenza were obtained from 2004 to 2013. Age-specific epidemic curves of viruses other than A(H1N1)pdm09 were compared between the pre-pandemic (May 2004 – April 2009), pandemic (May 2009 – April 2010) and post-pandemic periods (May 2010 – April 2013).

Results

There were two peaks of A(H1N1)pdm09 in Hong Kong, the first in September 2009 and the second in February 2011. The infection rate was found highest in young children in both waves, but markedly fewer cases in school children were recorded in the second wave than in the first wave. Positive proportions of viruses other than A(H1N1)pdm09 markedly decreased in all age groups during the first pandemic wave. After the first wave of the pandemic, the positive proportion of A(H3N2) increased, but those of B and RSV remained slightly lower than their pre-pandemic proportions. Changes in seasonal pattern and epidemic peak time were also observed, but inconsistent across virus-age groups.

Conclusion

Our findings provide some evidence that age distribution, seasonal pattern and peak time of other respiratory viruses have changed since the pandemic. These changes could be the result of immune interference and changing health seeking behavior, but the mechanism behind still needs further investigations.     

Risk factors and outcomes among children admitted to hospital with pandemic H1N1 influenza

Background

Limited data are available on disease characteristics and outcomes of children with 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus infection (pandemic H1N1 influenza) who have required hospital admission.

Methods

We reviewed the charts of 58 children with pandemic H1N1 influenza admitted to a large pediatric hospital in Ontario, Canada, between May 8 and July 22, 2009. We compared risk factors, severity indicators and outcomes of these children with those of 200 children admitted with seasonal influenza A during the previous 5 years (2004/05 to 2008/09).

Results

Children with pandemic H1N1 influenza were significantly older than those with seasonal influenza (median age 6.4 years v. 3.3 years). Forty-six (79%) of the children with pandemic H1N1 influenza had underlying medical conditions; of the other 12 who were previously healthy, 42% were under 2 years of age. Children admitted with pandemic H1N1 influenza were significantly more likely to have asthma than those with seasonal influenza (22% v. 6%). Two children had poorly controlled asthma, and 6 used inhaled medications only intermittently. The median length of stay in hospital was 4 days in both groups of children. Similar proportions of children required admission to the intensive care unit (21% of those with pandemic H1N1 influenza and 14% of those with seasonal influenza) and mechanical ventilation (12% and 10% respectively). None of the children admitted with pandemic H1N1 influenza died, as compared with 1 (0.4%) of those admitted with seasonal influenza.

Interpretation

Pandemic H1N1 influenza did not appear to cause more severe disease than seasonal influenza A. Asthma appears to be a significant risk factor for severe disease, with no clear relation to severity of asthma. This finding should influence strategies for vaccination and pre-emptive antiviral therapy.Influenza causes significant morbidity and mortality in childhood.¹ Infants, young children and people 65 years of age and older account for the highest rates of influenza-related hospital admission.² Earlier case series of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus infection (pandemic H1N1 influenza) reported small numbers of children^3,4 or did not present data on children separately.⁵ A recently published series that included 122 children confirmed typical influenza-like presentation, reported a high prevalence of underlying medical conditions (60%, including asthma in 29%) and described the need for intensive care in 20% and mechanical ventilation in 10%.⁶ A previous comparison of children with pandemic H1N1 influenza and those in previous years with seasonal influenza included only children considered to have died of influenza.⁷In this article, we present our experience with children admitted to hospital with pandemic H1N1 influenza. Our primary goal was to describe the demographic characteristics, clinical features and markers of severity of illness of these children. Our secondary goal was to identify risk factors for severe disease or poor outcome by comparing these children with those who had been admitted in previous years with seasonal influenza.     

SNPer: An R Library for Quantitative Variant Analysis on Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms among Influenza Virus Populations

Influenza virus (IFV) can evolve rapidly leading to genetic drifts and shifts resulting in human and animal influenza epidemics and pandemics. The genetic shift that gave rise to the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic originated from a triple gene reassortment of avian, swine and human IFVs. More minor genetic alterations in genetic drift can lead to influenza drug resistance such as the H274Y mutation associated with oseltamivir resistance. Hence, a rapid tool to detect IFV mutations and the potential emergence of new virulent strains can better prepare us for seasonal influenza outbreaks as well as potential pandemics. Furthermore, identification of specific mutations by closely examining single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in IFV sequences is essential to classify potential genetic markers associated with potentially dangerous IFV phenotypes. In this study, we developed a novel R library called “SNPer” to analyze quantitative variants in SNPs among IFV subpopulations. The computational SNPer program was applied to three different subpopulations of published IFV genomic information. SNPer queried SNPs data and grouped the SNPs into (1) universal SNPs, (2) likely common SNPs, and (3) unique SNPs. SNPer outperformed manual visualization in terms of time and labor. SNPer took only three seconds with no errors in SNP comparison events compared with 40 hours with errors using manual visualization. The SNPer tool can accelerate the capacity to capture new and potentially dangerous IFV strains to mitigate future influenza outbreaks.