Functional Fluorescent Protein Insertions in Herpes Simplex Virus gB Report on gB Conformation before and after Execution of Membrane Fusion

Entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into a target cell requires complex interactions and conformational changes by viral glycoproteins gD, gH/gL, and gB. During viral entry, gB transitions from a prefusion to a postfusion conformation, driving fusion of the viral envelope with the host cell membrane. While the structure of postfusion gB is known, the prefusion conformation of gB remains elusive. As the prefusion conformation of gB is a critical target for neutralizing antibodies, we set out to describe its structure by making genetic insertions of fluorescent proteins (FP) throughout the gB ectodomain. We created gB constructs with FP insertions in each of the three globular domains of gB. Among 21 FP insertion constructs, we found 8 that allowed gB to remain membrane fusion competent. Due to the size of an FP, regions in gB that tolerate FP insertion must be solvent exposed. Two FP insertion mutants were cell-surface expressed but non-functional, while FP insertions located in the crown were not surface expressed. This is the first report of placing a fluorescent protein insertion within a structural domain of a functional viral fusion protein, and our results are consistent with a model of prefusion HSV gB constructed from the prefusion VSV G crystal structure. Additionally, we found that functional FP insertions from two different structural domains could be combined to create a functional form of gB labeled with both CFP and YFP. FRET was measured with this construct, and we found that when co-expressed with gH/gL, the FRET signal from gB was significantly different from the construct containing CFP alone, as well as gB found in syncytia, indicating that this construct and others of similar design are likely to be powerful tools to monitor the conformation of gB in any model system accessible to light microscopy.     

Cascade of Events Governing Cell-Cell Fusion Induced by Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoproteins gD,gH/gL,and gB

Herpesviruses minimally require the envelope proteins gB and gH/gL for virus entry and cell-cell fusion; herpes simplex virus (HSV) additionally requires the receptor-binding protein gD. Although gB is a class III fusion protein, gH/gL does not resemble any documented viral fusion protein at a structural level. Based on those data, we proposed that gH/gL does not function as a cofusogen with gB but instead regulates the fusogenic activity of gB. Here, we present data to support that hypothesis. First, receptor-positive B78H1-C10 cells expressing gH/gL fused with receptor-negative B78H1 cells expressing gB and gD (fusion in trans). Second, fusion occurred when gH/gL-expressing C10 cells preexposed to soluble gD were subsequently cocultured with gB-expressing B78 cells. In contrast, prior exposure of gB-expressing C10 cells to soluble gD did not promote subsequent fusion with gH/gL-expressing B78 cells. These data suggest that fusion involves activation of gH/gL by receptor-bound gD. Most importantly, soluble gH/gL triggered a low level of fusion of C10 cells expressing gD and gB; a much higher level was achieved when gB-expressing C10 cells were exposed to a combination of soluble gH/gL and gD. These data clearly show that gB acts as the HSV fusogen following activation by gD and gH/gL. We suggest the following steps leading to fusion: (i) conformational changes to gD upon receptor binding, (ii) alteration of gH/gL by receptor-activated gD, and (iii) upregulation of the fusogenic potential of gB following its interaction with activated gH/gL. The third step may be common to other herpesviruses.Herpesviruses enter cells by fusing their envelopes with host cell membranes either by direct fusion at the plasma membrane or by pH-dependent or -independent endocytosis, depending on the target cell (27, 29, 39). Although the entry pathways of other enveloped viruses are similarly diverse (8), all systems for which molecular details have been obtained rely on a single fusion protein (43); herpesviruses are unique in their use of gB and the gH/gL heterodimer as their core fusion machinery (17, 37). Some herpesviruses employ additional receptor-binding glycoproteins, e.g., herpex simplex virus (HSV) gD, and others require gH/gL-associated proteins, e.g., UL128-131 of cytomegalovirus (CMV) (34) or gp42 of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (42). This complexity has made it difficult to unravel the mechanism of herpesvirus entry.Ultrastructural and biochemical studies have shown that for HSV entry, binding of gD to one of its receptors, either HVEM or nectin-1 (36), activates the downstream events that drive gB- and gH/gL-dependent fusion (17). The structure of the gB ectodomain (18) bears striking structural homology to the postfusion form of the single fusion protein G of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (33). However, unlike the other class III viral fusion proteins, VSV G and baculovirus gp64 (5), gB requires gH/gL to function in virus-cell and cell-cell fusion (17). A number of investigations support the concept that gH/gL might also be fusogenic (13, 41). Some have suggested that a multiprotein complex comprised of gD, gH/gL, and gB might be assembled to cause fusion (14). Using bimolecular complementation (BiMC), we and others showed that interactions can occur between half enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP)-tagged gB (e.g., gBn) and tagged gD (e.g., gDc) or between tagged gD and tagged gH (1, 3). However, because these occur in the absence of one of the other essential components, e.g., a receptor, we could not assess their functional significance. Importantly, gH/gL and gB interact with each other only in response to receptor binding by gD (1-3, 12). We subsequently showed that this interaction precedes fusion and is required for it to occur (2). Thus, we were able to conclude that gH/gL must interact with gB, whether transiently or stably, in order for fusion to occur. Whether gD was indeed involved in a multiprotein complex was not clear, nor was the role of gH/gL in promoting fusion initiated by gD-receptor binding. The lack of structural data for gH/gL left its potential role as a fusogen unresolved.However, in 2010, the structure of gH/gL of HSV-2 was solved in collaboration with Chowdary et al. (12). Structurally, gH/gL does not resemble any known viral fusogen, thereby forcing a reconsideration of its function in promoting virus-cell and cell-cell fusion. We hypothesized that gH/gL does not likely act as a cofusogen with gB but rather regulates fusion by gB (12).In this report, we argue that as a regulator of fusion, gH/gL might not have to be in the same membrane as gB in order to regulate its activity, i.e., gH/gL on one cell might promote fusion of gB expressed by another cell, as long as gD and a gD receptor are also present. In support of this, it was recently shown that gH/gL and gB of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) can cause cell-cell fusion when expressed by distinct cells (in trans) (41). We present evidence that HSV gB and gH/gL can cause cell-cell fusion when they are expressed in trans, a process that requires both gD and a gD receptor. Although the efficiency of fusion in trans is low compared with that of fusion when gB and gH/gL are in cis (as they would be when in the virus), separation of these proteins onto two different cells enabled us to dissect the order in which each protein acts along the pathway to fusion. Moreover, we found that a combination of soluble gD (not membrane bound) and soluble gH/gL (also not membrane bound) could trigger fusion of receptor-bearing cells that had been transfected with the gene for gB. Our data show that gD, gH/gL, and gB act in a series of steps whereby gD is first activated by binding its cell receptor. Previous studies showed that receptor binding causes gD to undergo conformational changes (17). Based on the data in this paper, we propose that these changes then enable gD to activate gH/gL into a form that in turn binds to and activates the fusogenic activity of gB. Although we do not know whether any of these reactions result in the formation of a stable complex, our data suggest that gB is the sole HSV fusogen and that gD and gH/gL act to upregulate cell-cell fusion and most likely virus-cell fusion, leading to HSV entry.     

Differential Effects on Cell Fusion Activity of Mutations in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Glycoprotein B (gB) Dependent on Whether a gD Receptor or a gB Receptor Is Overexpressed

Glycoprotein B (gB) of herpes simplex virus (HSV) is one of four glycoproteins essential for viral entry and cell fusion. Recently, paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor (PILRα) was identified as a receptor for HSV type 1 (HSV-1) gB. Both PILRα and a gD receptor were shown to participate in HSV-1 entry into certain cell types. The purpose of this study was to determine whether insertional mutations in gB had differential effects on its function with PILRα and the gD receptor, nectin-1. Previously described gB mutants and additional newly characterized mutants were used in this study. We found that insertional mutations near the N terminus and C terminus of gB and especially in the central region of the ectodomain reduced cell fusion activity when PILRα was overexpressed much more than when nectin-1 was overexpressed. Most of the insertions reduced the binding of gB to PILRα, for at least some forms of gB, but this reduction did not necessarily correlate with the selective reduction in cell fusion activity with PILRα. These results suggest that the regions targeted by the relevant mutations are critical for functional activity with PILRα. They also suggest that, although both the binding of gB to a gB receptor and the binding of gD to a gD receptor may be required for HSV-induced cell fusion, the two receptor-binding activities may have unequal weights in triggering fusogenic activity, depending on the ratios of gB and gD receptors or other factors.Manifestations of disease caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) include recurrent mucocutaneous lesions in the mouth or on the face or genitalia and, more rarely, meningitis or encephalitis. The infection of host cells occurs by the fusion of the virion envelope with a cell membrane to deliver the nucleocapsid containing the viral genome into the host cell. This entry process and virus-induced cell fusion require glycoprotein B (gB), along with gD, gH, and gL. The membrane-fusing activity of HSV depends in part on the binding of gD to one of its receptors, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), nectin-1, nectin-2, or 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate (18). HVEM is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family and is expressed by cells of the immune system, as well as many other cell types, such as epithelial, stromal, and endothelial cells (23). Nectin-1 and nectin-2 are cell adhesion molecules belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily and are widely expressed by a variety of cell types, including epithelial cells and neurons (20). Specific sites in heparan sulfate generated by particular 3-O-sulfotransferases can serve as gD-binding entry receptors (17). This binding of gD to a receptor is associated with conformational changes in gD that are thought to enable gD to interact with gB and/or the heterodimer gH-gL to trigger fusogenic activity (8, 12). Both gB and gH have properties of fusogenic viral proteins (1, 7). Although evidence has been presented that gD and gH-gL are sufficient for hemifusion and that gB, in addition, is required for fusion pore formation (19), the specific roles each plays in HSV-induced membrane fusion have not been fully defined.gB was recently discovered to bind to paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor (PILRα) in an interaction that can mediate viral entry and cell fusion, provided that gD also binds to one of its receptors (14). For cells such as CD14⁺ monocytes, antibodies specific for either HVEM or PILRα were shown to block HSV entry. Also, entry requires the presence of both gD and gB in the virion. Although the overexpression of either a gD receptor or a gB receptor can enhance the susceptibility of cells to HSV entry and HSV-induced cell fusion, there are very few, if any, cell types that do not express at least low levels of endogenous receptors. Thus, the possibility exists that these endogenous receptors are cooperating with the introduced receptors to render the cells susceptible to HSV-induced membrane fusion.PILRα belongs to the paired-receptor families, which consist of activating and inhibitory receptors (4, 11, 19). They are conserved among mammals (24). The inhibitory form PILRα has an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif in its cytoplasmic domain and transduces inhibitory signals (4). On the other hand, the activating form PILRβ associates with the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-bearing DAP12 adaptor molecule and delivers activating signals (16). Both PILRα and PILRβ are expressed on cells of the immune system, especially monocytes, dendritic cells, and NK cells (4, 11, 19), and also in neurons (14). CD99 has been identified as a natural ligand for both PILRα and PILRβ (16). The binding of either PILRα or PILRβ to CD99 depends on the presence of sialyated O-linked glycans on CD99 (22).In addition to binding to PILRα, gB can bind to heparin and heparan sulfate and may contribute, along with gC, to the binding of HSV to cell surface heparan sulfate (17). Also, gB and gC can bind to DC-SIGN, which serves as a binding receptor for the infection of dendritic cells (2). An X-ray structure of the HSV-1 gB ectodomain reveals a homotrimeric conformation with structural homology to vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G glycoprotein, the single glycoprotein responsible for the entry of VSV. Both HSV-1 gB and VSV G glycoprotein have features of class 1 and class 2 viral fusion proteins and have been designated class 3 fusion proteins (7, 14, 15). The heparan sulfate-binding determinant of gB has been localized to a lysine-rich domain in the N terminus and shown to be dispensable for viral entry (9). It lies within a region that is probably disordered and was not included in the defined coordinates of the X-ray structure. The binding of DC-SIGN to gB probably depends on high-mannose N-glycans of gB (6).In a previous study (10), 81 insertion mutants of HSV-1 gB were characterized to assess the effects of the insertions on protein processing and function in cell fusion with gD receptors, in relation to structural domains of gB identified in an X-ray structure (7). Only 27 mutants were found to be processed into mature glycosylated forms and transported to the cell surface. Only 11 of these retained fusion activity toward target cells expressing nectin-1 or HVEM. For the present study, we used 25 previously described gB insertion mutants shown to be expressed on cell surfaces and also identified an additional 10 such mutants.The present study was designed to determine whether the effects of insertions in gB on cell fusion activity would be dependent on whether a gD receptor (nectin-1) or a gB receptor (PILRα) was overexpressed in target cells that also expressed unidentified weak endogenous receptors. In addition, we assessed the abilities of the gB mutants to bind to PILRα. Our results showed that some insertions inhibited cell fusion activity when PILRα was overexpressed significantly more than when nectin-1 was overexpressed, but without necessarily preventing the binding of PILRα to gB, at least to some stable oligomeric forms of gB. The results indicate that, although both a gB receptor and a gD receptor may be required for cell fusion activity, the two receptor-binding activities have unequal weights in triggering fusogenic activity, depending on the ratios of gB and gD receptors or other factors.     

Glycoproteins gB, gD, and gHgL of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Are Necessary and Sufficient To Mediate Membrane Fusion in a Cos Cell Transfection System

Herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoproteins gB, gD, and gHgL were expressed by transient transfection of Cos cells. Polykaryocyte formation above the background level seen in untransfected controls was observed only if all three components were expressed. Thus, gB, gD, and gHgL are necessary and sufficient to induce membrane fusion.     

Gene Therapy of Lung Adenocarcinoma using Herpes Virus Expressing a Fusogenic Membrane Glycoprotein

The aim of this study is to observe the in vitro-targeted destruction of lung adenocarcinoma using recombinant Type I herpes simplex virus (HSV-I)-mediated gibbon ape leukemia virus envelope glycoprotein (GALV.fus), controlled by UL38 promoter and cytomegalovirus promoter (CMVP). A recombinant HSV-I plasmid encoding the GALV.fus was transfected into green monkey kidney cells, the lung adenocarcinoma line A549, and the human fetal fibroblast cell line HFL-I GNHu5 in various doses. The effects and expression of in vitro GALV.fus were observed using an inverted microscope. Enhanced green fluorescence protein expression served as the contro1 for GALV.fus. Recombinant HSV-I virus was produced. Fusogenic recombinant virus infection led to cell fusions in A549 in a dose-dependent manner. Nonfusogenic viruses only produced conventional cytotoxic effects. Recombinant HSV-I with the CMVP initiated cell fusions in HFL-1 GNHu5 cells with arrested cell cycles or as quiescence. HSV-I regulated by UL38p caused cell fusion only in growing cells. Protein expression of GALV.fus was confirmed by Western Blot in infected A549 and HFL-1 GNHu5. Delivery and tumor-specific expression of GALV.fus gene can selectively and safely target lung cancer in vitro, and may prove to be a novel gene therapy for lung cancer.     

Phosphatidylinositol-Dependent Membrane Fusion Induced by a Putative Fusogenic Sequence of Ebola Virus

The membrane-interacting abilities of three sequences representing the putative fusogenic subdomain of the Ebola virus transmembrane protein have been investigated. In the presence of calcium, the sequence EBO_GE (GAAIGLAWIPYFGPAAE) efficiently fused unilamellar vesicles composed of phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, cholesterol, and phosphatidylinositol (molar ratio, 2:1:1:0.5), a mixture that roughly resembles the lipid composition of the hepatocyte plasma membrane. Analysis of the lipid dependence of the process demonstrated that the fusion activity of EBO_GE was promoted by phosphatidylinositol but not by other acidic phospholipids. In comparison, EBO_EA (EGAAIGLAWIPYFGPAA) and EBO_EE (EGAAIGLAWIPYFGPAAE) sequences, which are similar to EBO_GE except that they bear the negatively charged glutamate residue at the N terminus and at both the N and C termini, respectively, induced fusion to a lesser extent. As revealed by binding experiments, the glutamate residue at the N terminus severely impaired peptide-vesicle interaction. In addition, the fusion-competent EBO_GE sequence did not associate significantly with vesicles lacking phosphatidylinositol. Tryptophan fluorescence quenching by vesicles containing brominated phospholipids indicated that the EBO_GE peptide penetrated to the acyl chain level only when the membranes contained phosphatidylinositol. We conclude that binding and further penetration of the Ebola virus putative fusion peptide into membranes might be governed by the nature of the N-terminal residue and by the presence of phosphatidylinositol in the target membrane. Moreover, since insertion of such a peptide leads to membrane destabilization and fusion, the present data would be compatible with the involvement of this sequence in Ebola virus fusion.Ebola virus belongs to the Filoviridae family (23). This human pathogen occasionally causes epidemics of African hemorrhagic fever with a high rate of mortality (8, 23, 37). Little is known about the viral infectivity mechanism, and there is no specific treatment for Ebola virus hemorrhagic fever as yet. The most prominent pathology of Ebola virus infection includes necrosis of liver parenchyma as a direct consequence of virus replication (23). Ebola virus virions are composed of a helical nucleocapsid containing one linear, negative-sense, single-stranded RNA and surrounded by a lipidic envelope derived from the host cell plasma membrane (8, 23). The envelope contains solely one type of highly glycosylated protein (Ebola GP) arranged into oligomers, most probably trimers, which constitute the spikes that protrude from the virion surface (8, 30, 38, 39).The mode of entry of Ebola virus into target cells remains unknown. However it seems likely that the single surface protein Ebola GP is responsible for both receptor binding and membrane fusion during entry into the host cells. Homology analysis of its coding gene-derived sequence has identified several structural features that Ebola GP shares with other envelope fusion proteins derived from oncogenic retroviruses (12, 39). Just recently a detailed analysis has detected a high degree of structural homology between Ebola GP and the Rous sarcoma virus transmembrane protein (12). Several structural elements that might be involved in the ectodomain fusogenic function are shared by these viruses. In particular, there exists in both viruses an amino acid region bounded by cysteines that has at its center a sequence of approximately 16 uncharged and hydrophobic residues. Its location with respect to the viral membrane, the presence of a canonical fusion tripeptide (YFG in Ebola virus), and the fact that this sequence exhibits a high degree of identity among the Filoviridae members suggest that this region might constitute in Ebola virus the fusion peptide that is critical for virion-membrane fusion in the Retroviridae and other families (11, 40, 41).According to the most widely accepted mechanistic model proposed for the initial phase of the viral fusion process, activation of the viral spikes induces the exposure of previously buried hydrophobic fusion peptides in the vicinity of the target cell (5, 43). Further interaction of the viral fusion peptides with the cell membrane would depend mainly on the capacity for binding of these peptides to the membrane lipid components and could eventually trigger the process that brings about the actual merging of the viral and cell membranes via a currently unknown mechanism (41). This fact has justified the development of in vitro studies on the membrane-destabilizing effects of fusion peptides by using representative synthetic peptides of different viruses and model membranes (7, 15, 19, 29).The membrane environment into which the fusion peptide should partition obviously plays an important role in the process. Previous work from this laboratory has focused on the effect of the target membrane composition on viral fusion. Reports from this and other laboratories indicate the existence of conformational changes induced by lipidic components in the membrane-bound human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) fusion peptide (25, 28, 29), and we have identified a fusogenic conformation of the peptide represented by an extended β-type structure (25, 26, 28). The fusogenic interaction of the HIV-1 fusion peptide is, moreover, sensitive to factors that affect gp41 activity in vivo (27). Modulation of viral fusion by lipids has also been observed for complete virions and reconstituted systems fusing with model membranes (6, 24, 42). These observations indicate that enveloped viruses may optimize host interactions during the entry process, not only at the level of the selective binding to cell receptors but also at the level of the envelope fusion and subsequent capsid penetration.Our primary objective in this study was to confirm that the proposed fusogenic sequence for Ebola virus might interact with membranes, destabilize them, and eventually induce fusion. Because Ebola virus infects and replicates very efficiently in the liver, we initially employed as target membranes large unilamellar vesicles (LUV) made of a lipidic mixture that represents the hepatocyte plasma membrane composition (18). Our results demonstrate that this Ebola virus peptide interacts with phosphatidylinositol (PI)-containing membranes and induces vesicle fusion. Moreover, we show that the sequence lacking the negatively charged Glu residue at the N terminus interacts more efficiently with membranes. These data suggest that, similarly to the HIV-1 fusion peptide (26–28), the Ebola virus peptide segment under study may be important in viral fusion in vivo.     

Herpes Simplex Virus gD Forms Distinct Complexes with Fusion Executors gB and gH/gL in Part through the C-terminal Profusion Domain

Herpes simplex virus entry into cells requires a multipartite fusion apparatus made of glycoprotein D (gD), gB, and heterodimer gH/gL. gD serves as a receptor-binding glycoprotein and trigger of fusion; its ectodomain is organized in an N-terminal domain carrying the receptor-binding sites and a C-terminal domain carrying the profusion domain, required for fusion but not receptor binding. gB and gH/gL execute fusion. To understand how the four glycoproteins cross-talk to each other, we searched for biochemical defined complexes in infected and transfected cells and in virions. Previously, interactions were detected in transfected whole cells by split green fluorescent protein complementation (Atanasiu, D., Whitbeck, J. C., Cairns, T. M., Reilly, B., Cohen, G. H., and Eisenberg, R. J. (2007) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 18718–18723; Avitabile, E., Forghieri, C., and Campadelli-Fiume, G. (2007) J. Virol. 81, 11532–11537); it was not determined whether they led to biochemical complexes. Infected cells harbor a gD-gH complex (Perez-Romero, P., Perez, A., Capul, A., Montgomery, R., and Fuller, A. O. (2005) J. Virol. 79, 4540–4544). We report that gD formed complexes with gB in the absence of gH/gL and with gH/gL in the absence of gB. Complexes with similar composition were formed in infected and transfected cells. They were also present in virions prior to entry and did not increase at virus entry into the cell. A panel of gD mutants enabled the preliminary location of part of the binding site in gD to gB to the amino acids 240–260 portion and downstream with Thr³⁰⁴-Pro³⁰⁵ as critical residues and of the binding site to gH/gL at the amino acids 260–310 portion with Pro²⁹¹-Pro²⁹² as critical residues. The results indicate that gD carries composite-independent binding sites for gB and gH/gL, both of which are partly located in the profusion domain.     

Cross Talk among the Glycoproteins Involved in Herpes Simplex Virus Entry and Fusion: the Interaction between gB and gH/gL Does Not Necessarily Require gD

The gD, gB, and gH/gL glycoprotein quartet constitutes the basic apparatus for herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry into the cell and fusion. gD serves as a receptor binding glycoprotein and trigger of fusion. The conserved gB and gH/gL execute fusion. Central to understanding HSV entry/fusion has become the dissection of how the four glycoproteins engage in cross talk. While the independent interactions of gD with gB and gD with gH/gL have been documented, less is known of the interaction of gB with gH/gL. So far, this interaction has been detected only in the presence of gD by means of a split green fluorescent protein complementation assay. Here, we show that gB interacts with gH/gL in the absence of gD. The gB-gH/gL complex was best detected with a form of gB in which the endocytosis and phosphorylation motif have been deleted; this form of gB persists in the membranes of the exocytic pathway and is not endocytosed. The gB-gH/gL interaction was detected both in whole transfected cells by means of a split yellow fluorescent protein complementation assay and, biochemically, by a pull-down assay. Results with a panel of chimeric forms of gB, in which portions of the glycoprotein bracketed by consecutive cysteines were replaced with the corresponding portions from human herpesvirus 8 gB, favor the view that gB carries multiple sites for interaction with gH/gL, and one of these sites is located in the pleckstrin-like domain 1 carrying the bipartite fusion loop.Entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into the cell requires a multipartite apparatus made of a quartet of viral glycoproteins, gD, gB, and the heterodimer gH/gL, and a multistep process that culminates in the fusion of the virion envelope with cell membranes (5, 6, 10, 25, 36, 41). gD serves as the receptor-binding glycoprotein, able to interact with alternative receptors, nectin1, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) and, in some cells, modified heparan sulfate (9, 13, 30, 39). It can also be engineered to accept heterologous ligands able to interact with selected receptors present on tumor cells and thus represents a tool to redirect HSV tropism (21, 28, 29, 42). The heterodimer gH/gL and gB execute fusion and constitute the conserved fusion apparatus across the Herpesviridae family. gB structure in the postfusion conformation shows a trimer with a central coiled coil (19). gH shows elements typical of type 1 fusion glycoproteins, in particular, helices able to interact with membranes, and two heptad repeats potentially able to form a coiled coil (12, 15-18). The discovery that a soluble form of gD enables entry of gD-null virions revealed that gD serves the additional function of triggering fusion and led to the view that the major roles of gD are to sense that virus has reached a receptor-positive cell and to signal to gB and gH/gL that fusion is to be executed (8). Biochemical and structural analyses showed that the C-terminal region of the gD ectodomain, containing the profusion domain required for fusion but not for receptor binding, can undergo major conformational changes (11, 24). Specifically, it binds the gD core and masks or hinders the receptor binding sites, conferring upon the molecule a closed, auto-inhibited conformation (24). Alternatively, it may unfold, conferring upon gD an open conformation. It was proposed that the C terminus of gD unfolds from gD core at receptor binding and recruits gH/gL and gB to a quaternary complex. A key feature of the model was that complexes among the glycoprotein quartet were not preformed, but, rather, they would assemble at the onset of or at fusion execution.Central to understanding HSV entry/fusion has become the dissection of the interactions that occur among the members of the glycoprotein quartet and their significance to the process. A first evidence of a gD-gH/gL interaction was provided in coimmunoprecipitation studies (35). Interactions between gD and gH/gL and between gD and gB were subsequently detected by split green fluorescence protein (GFP) complementation assays, implying that gD can recruit gB and gH/gL independently of one another, a result that argues against a stepwise recruitment of the glycoproteins to gD. In agreement with the proposed model, the interaction between gH/gL and gB was detected in the presence of transfected or soluble gD (1, 2). However, further studies highlighted levels of complexity not foreseen in the initial model. Thus, pull-down analyses showed that the interaction sites in gD with gB and with gH/gL lie in part outside the C-terminal portion of the gD ectodomain, that resting virions contain small amounts of gD in complex with gB and with gH/gL prior to encountering cells, and that de novo gD-gB complexes were not detected at virus entry into the cell (14).A major objective of current studies was to analyze the interaction of gB with gH/gL. We documented the interaction by two independent assays, i.e., by a complementation assay of split yellow fluorescent protein Venus (herein indicated as YFP) (31) in whole cells and, biochemically, by a pull-down assay. The latter was applied recently in our laboratory and is based on the ability of One-Strep-tagged proteins (e.g., gH) to specifically absorb to Strep-Tactin resin and thus retain any protein in complex (14). To preliminarily search for gB regions critical for the interaction with gH/gL, we engineered chimeric forms of HSV-1 and human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) gB in which the cysteines were preserved. While none of the chimeras was completely defective in the interaction, the interactions in the chimeras carrying substitutions in the pleckstrin-like domain 1—the domain that carries the bipartite fusion loops—were hampered. Altogether, the results underscore the ability of gB to interact with gH/gL in the absence of gD and favor the view that sites in gB for interaction with gH/gL involve multiple contacts, one of which is located in the domain that carries the fusion loops.     

Herpes Simplex Virus gD and Virions Accumulate in Endosomes by Mannose 6-Phosphate-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoprotein D (gD) is modified with mannose 6-phosphate (M6P) and binds to M6P receptors (MPRs). MPRs are involved in the well-characterized pathway by which lysosomal enzymes are directed to lysosomes via a network of endosomal membranes. Based on the impaired ability of HSV to form plaques under conditions in which glycoproteins could not interact with MPRs, we proposed that MPRs may function during HSV egress or cell-to-cell spread (C. R. Brunetti, R. L. Burke, B. Hoflack, T. Ludwig, K. S. Dingwell, and D. C. Johnson, J. Virol. 69:3517–3528, 1995). To further analyze M6P modification and intracellular trafficking of gD in the absence of other HSV proteins, adenovirus (Ad) vectors were used to express soluble and membrane-anchored forms of gD. Both membrane-bound and soluble gD were modified with M6P residues and were localized to endosomes that contained the 275-kDa MPR or the transferrin receptor. Similar results were observed in HSV-infected cells. Cell fractionation experiments showed that gD was not present in lysosomes. However, a mutant form of gD and another HSV glycoprotein, gI, that were not modified with M6P were also found in endosomes in HSV-infected cells. Moreover, a substantial fraction of the HSV nucleocapsid protein VP6 was found in endosomes, consistent with accumulation of virions in an endosomal compartment. Therefore, it appears that HSV glycoproteins and virions are directed to endosomes, by M6P-dependent as well as by M6P-independent mechanisms, either as part of the virus egress pathway or by endocytosis from the cell surface.     

Tin Oxide Nanowires Suppress Herpes Simplex Virus-1 Entry and Cell-to-Cell Membrane Fusion

The advent of nanotechnology has ushered in the use of modified nanoparticles as potential antiviral agents against diseases such as herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 (HSV-1) (HSV-2), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), monkeypox virus, and hepatitis B virus. Here we describe the application of tin oxide (SnO₂) nanowires as an effective treatment against HSV-1 infection. SnO₂ nanowires work as a carrier of negatively charged structures that compete with HSV-1 attachment to cell bound heparan sulfate (HS), therefore inhibiting entry and subsequent cell-to-cell spread. This promising new approach can be developed into a novel form of broad-spectrum antiviral therapy especially since HS has been shown to serve as a cellular co-receptor for a number of other viruses as well, including the respiratory syncytial virus, adeno-associated virus type 2, and human papilloma virus.     

Dual Split Protein-Based Fusion Assay Reveals that Mutations to Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Glycoprotein gB Alter the Kinetics of Cell-Cell Fusion Induced by HSV Entry Glycoproteins

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry and cell-cell fusion require glycoproteins gD, gH/gL, and gB. We propose that receptor-activated changes to gD cause it to activate gH/gL, which then triggers gB into an active form. We employed a dual split-protein (DSP) assay to monitor the kinetics of HSV glycoprotein-induced cell-cell fusion. This assay measures content mixing between two cells, i.e., fusion, within the same cell population in real time (minutes to hours). Titration experiments suggest that both gD and gH/gL act in a catalytic fashion to trigger gB. In fact, fusion rates are governed by the amount of gB on the cell surface. We then used the DSP assay to focus on mutants in two functional regions (FRs) of gB, FR1 and FR3. FR1 contains the fusion loops (FL1 and FL2), and FR3 encompasses the crown at the trimer top. All FL mutants initiated fusion very slowly, if at all. However, the fusion rates caused by some FL2 mutants increased over time, so that total fusion by 8 h looked much like that of the WT. Two distinct kinetic patterns, “slow and fast,” emerged for mutants in the crown of gB (FR3), again showing differences in initiation and ongoing fusion. Of note are the fusion kinetics of the gB syn mutant (LL871/872AA). Although this mutant was originally included as an ongoing high-rate-of-fusion control, its initiation of fusion is so rapid that it appears to be on a “hair trigger.” Thus, the DSP assay affords a unique way to examine the dynamics of HSV glycoprotein-induced cell fusion.     

Insertional Mutations in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 gL Identify Functional Domains for Association with gH and for Membrane Fusion

Glycoprotein L (gL) is one of four glycoproteins required for the entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into cells and for virus-induced cell fusion. This glycoprotein oligomerizes with gH to form a membrane-bound heterodimer but can be secreted when expressed without gH. Twelve unique gL linker-insertion mutants were generated to identify regions critical for gH binding and gH/gL processing and regions essential for cell fusion and viral entry. All gL mutants were detected on the cell surface in the absence of gH, suggesting incomplete cleavage of the signal peptide or the presence of a cell surface receptor for secreted gL. Coexpression with gH enhanced the levels of cell surface gL detected by antibodies for all gL mutants except those that were defective in their interactions with gH. Two insertions into a conserved region of gL abrogated the binding of gL to gH and prevented gH expression on the cell surface. Three other insertions reduced the cell surface expression of gH and/or altered the properties of gH/gL heterodimers. Altered or absent interaction of gL with gH was correlated with reduced or absent cell fusion activity and impaired complementation of virion infectivity. These results identify a conserved domain of gL that is critical for its binding to gH and two noncontiguous regions of gL, one of which contains the conserved domain, that are critical for the gH/gL complex to perform its role in membrane fusion.Glycoprotein L (gL) is one of the four glycoproteins required for the entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into cells and for virus-induced cell fusion (26, 33). The others are gB, gD, and gH (30). The functional unit containing gL is a heterodimer formed with gH (gH/gL) (15). Because mature gL has no membrane-spanning domain, other than a cleavable signal peptide, it is secreted unless it is coexpressed with gH, a type 1 glycoprotein that anchors gL to the cell membrane (2). Also, gH is not properly processed or transported out of the endoplasmic reticulum unless it is coexpressed with gL (15).Most, if not all, herpesviruses express orthologs of gB, gH, and gL, which are believed to form the core membrane-fusing machinery necessary for viral entry and cell fusion. For some herpesviruses, such as Epstein-Barr virus and human cytomegalovirus, the gH/gL oligomer may contain additional viral subunits that can influence binding of the complex to cell receptors and determine cell tropism (14, 34, 35). For HSV, however, only gD and gB have been shown to have receptor-binding activities that are required for entry (27, 31). Although HSV gH has an RGD motif and the gH/gL heterodimer can bind to certain integrins, this binding seems not to be necessary for viral entry (3, 22).The initial interaction of HSV with cells can be the reversible attachment of virus to cell surface heparan sulfate, mediated by viral glycoprotein gB and/or gC (29). Then, gD can bind to one of its receptors, including herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family; nectin-1 or nectin-2, cell adhesion molecules belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily; or specific sites in heparan sulfate generated by 3-O-sulfotransferases (31). In addition to binding to heparan sulfate, gB can also bind to other cell surface receptors, including paired immunoglobulin-like receptor alpha (PILRα) (27). Binding of both gD and gB to one of their respective receptors appears to be required for triggering the membrane-fusing activity of gB and/or gH/gL, which leads to viral entry.A recent X-ray structure of HSV type 1 (HSV-1) gB suggests that it is a class III viral fusogen similar in domain organization, but not primary sequence, to the G protein of vesicular stomatitis virus (13). It has been proposed that HSV-1 gH has features characteristic of class I viral fusogens, such as putative heptad repeats and fusion peptides (6, 9-11). Also, peptides matching the sequence of gH can interact with lipids and/or induce the fusion of lipid vesicles (4, 5, 8). Hemifusion between cells and between virus and cell can be induced by gH/gL and gD in the absence of gB (32). Many questions remain about the respective roles of gH/gL and gB in inducing membrane fusion.The four conserved cysteines in gL were found to be essential for gL-gH association and function (1). Mutational analyses of gL by C-terminal deletions showed that the first 147 amino acids of gL are sufficient for association with gH but that the first 161 amino acids are necessary for cotransport of gH and gL to the cell surface (17, 23) and for gL activity in cell fusion and viral entry (17). Lastly, certain anti-gL monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) can inhibit cell fusion but not viral entry, despite demonstrable binding of the MAbs to virus, suggesting that gL may play a different role in each process (21). These MAbs were mapped to the C-terminal region of gL (21, 23). The diagram at the bottom of Fig. ​Fig.11 shows the locations of the gL features mentioned above and of the signal peptide.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Effects of insertional mutations on HSV-1 gL and gH cell surface expression. CHO cells were transfected with plasmids expressing gH and WT gL or a gL mutant. Cell surface expression of gL and gH was quantified by CELISA using polyclonal R88 antiserum (filled circles) and MAb 52S (open triangles), respectively. A linear representation of the gL polypeptide is shown below the graph, with coded bars identifying features of gL. The bars represent the signal peptide (uncolored hatched), the N-terminal 161-amino-acid fragment necessary for the formation of functional gH/gL complexes (dark gray), highly conserved residues within this fragment (cross-hatched dark- gray bar), and epitopes recognized by a panel of anti-gL MAbs (light-gray and uncolored vertically striped bars). The values presented for cell surface expression of each mutant gL and of cotransfected WT gH are means from three independent experiments expressed as percentages of WT gL (or of gH cotransfected with WT gL) values, after subtraction of background values obtained in the absence of gL expression and as a function of the position of the insertion. Standard deviations are presented in Fig. ​Fig.22 and ​and33 for similar experiments.The interactions between gL and gH required for proper intracellular transport, processing, and cell surface expression make it difficult to investigate the functional role of one of these glycoproteins in cell fusion and viral entry independently of the other. We generated a panel of gL linker-insertion mutants to identify regions critical for gH binding and transport and regions essential for cell fusion and viral entry. One aim was to determine whether these roles of gL could be dissociated or were linked. Characterization of 12 unique gL linker-insertion mutants showed that (i) a conserved domain of gL is critical for the physical interaction of gL with gH and for the normal processing of gH, (ii) two noncontiguous regions of gL, one of which contains the highly conserved domain, are critical for the normal conformation and function of gH/gL heterodimers, and (iii) wild-type (WT) and mutant gLs can be detected on the cell surface in the absence of gH, suggesting the possibility of an independent role for uncomplexed gL. These results support and extend previous studies suggesting that gL has a larger role in membrane fusion than serving as a chaperone for gH and that specific mutations in gL can influence the function of the gH/gL heterodimer.