Common cavity pressure during gastroesophageal reflux: reassessment using simultaneous pressure, impedance, and ultrasound imaging

An increase in intraesophageal pressure during transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation [referred to as common cavity (CC) pressure] is thought to be a marker of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Multiluminal impedance (MII) measurement is a sensitive marker of reflux entry into the esophagus during GER. We recorded GER using esophageal pressure, pH, impedance, and intraluminal ultrasound (US) images to understand the genesis of the esophageal CC pressure. Nine normal subjects underwent simultaneous MII/pH/pressure and US image recording of the esophagus for 2 h following a standardized meal. MII and pressure transducers were located at 5 and 15 cm above the LES. The US transducer and pH sensors were also placed at 5 cm above the LES. Refluxate entry into the esophagus by MII criteria was determined relative to the onset of CC pressure wave. Esophageal lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) and muscle CSA during GER were determined from the US images. Eighty liquid GER episodes identified using MII criteria, of which 55 were clearly associated with CC pressure waves, were analyzed. The GER reached 15 cm above LES in 49 of 55 (89%) by MII criteria, but the CC pressure wave was observed at 5 and 15 cm during all episodes. The propagation of the CC pressure wave was simultaneous between 5 and 15 cm during 49 of 55 (89%) of the GER episodes, but reflux entry by MII criteria was retrograde during 53 of 55 (96%) of these episodes. During 5 air-reflux episodes, MII showed a simultaneous reflux entry between the 5- and 15-cm site, however, the CC pressure preceded reflux entry during all of these episodes. There was poor correlation between the luminal CSA and the magnitude of CC pressure (R(2) = 0.144). US images revealed a close temporal correlation between CC pressure and the increase in esophageal muscle thickness and muscle CSA (markers of longitudinal muscle contraction). Disassociation between CC pressure and MII-detected reflux suggests that the onset of CC pressure is not due to GER. We speculate that longitudinal muscle contraction plays an important role in the genesis of CC pressure.     

Gastroesophageal dynamics during immersion in water to the neck.

This investigation was undertaken to study the effect of hydrostatic pressure on gastroesophageal dynamics during immersion in thermoneutral water to the neck. In 5 healthy male subjects (normal end-expiratory), gastric pressure (PG), esophageal pressure (PE), location and pressure of distal esophageal sphincter (des), location of respiratory inversion point (RIP), and gastroesophageal pH gradient were measured standing in air (A), standing in water to the neck (B), and standing in air with abdominal compression (C). The pressure was measured with a Honeywell esophageal catheter (model 31) with built-in pressure transducer. A Beckman stomach pH electrode (no. 39042) was positioned adjacent to the pressure transducer. PG increased from 4.6 +/- 0.6 (SE) mmHg in A to nearly 20 mmHg in B and C, while PE increased from -6.0 +/- 0.8 mmHg in A to -0.8 +/- 1.0 and -3.4 +/- 0.9 mmHg in B and C, respectively. However, PDES was always 11-15 mmHg higher than PG. The superior limit of DES was displaced cephalad by indicating a stretching of DES and a shortening of the esophagus. Qualitatively similar findings were obtained in C. In all experiments, the esophageal pH remained above 6, and no alteration in the amplitude of primary peristaltic waves was seen. It is concluded that a head-out immersion with increased gastroesophageal pressure gradient predisposes to gastric reflux in the absence of a competent DES mechanism.     

Distension during gastroesophageal reflux: effects of acid inhibition and correlation with symptoms

We studied spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux (GER)-induced esophageal distension using ultrasound imaging and its role in the genesis of esophageal symptoms before and during esomeprazole therapy. Ten controls and 10 GER disease (GERD) patients were studied by combined impedance, esophageal pH, manometry, and ultrasonography before and during esomeprazole therapy. Physiological data and symptoms were recorded for 2 h following a standardized meal. From ultrasound images, the esophageal cross-sectional area (CSA) at the peak of GER-induced distension was determined and compared between controls vs. patients, symptomatic vs. asymptomatic GER episodes, and before vs. during esomeprazole in GERD patients. The mean lumen CSA is greater in the patients than controls (271 +/- 71 mm(2) vs. 163 +/- 56 mm(2), P = 0.001) but not different among asymptomatic reflux episodes, and those associated with regurgitation (290 +/- 110 mm(2)) or heartburn (271 +/- 67 mm(2)). Eight chest pain episodes associated with reflux revealed a tendency toward larger mean esophageal distension (459 +/- 40 mm(2)) compared with asymptomatic reflux (268 +/- 70 mm(2), P = 0.058). Following esomeprazole treatment, most GER episodes were nonacidic and asymptomatic except in two patients in whom cyclical reflux was associated with large esophageal distensions. Esomeprazole did not alter the lumen CSA during GER. Esophageal distension is greater in the GERD subjects compared with controls; however, it is unlikely that the GER-induced distension of the esophagus plays a significant role in the genesis of heartburn sensation. Esomeprazole therapy does not alter the GER-induced distension of the esophagus.     

Esophageal tone in patients with total aperistalsis: gastroesophageal reflux disease versus achalasia

We have evaluated esophageal tone in two different conditions that, in some cases, similarly impair phasic esophageal motility. Studies were performed in 14 healthy volunteers, 10 patients with total esophageal aperistalsis secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and 25 untreated achalasia patients. We quantified esophageal compliance and relaxation induced by a nitric oxide donor using a barostat. Intraesophageal volume at a minimal distending pressure (2 mmHg) was not significantly different among all three groups (4.1 +/- 0.7, 3.8 +/- 0.7, and 4.2 +/- 1.2 ml for healthy, GERD, and achalasia groups, respectively). Esophageal compliance was significantly increased (P < 0.05 vs. healthy group) in the two groups of patients with aperistalsis (1.9 +/- 0.2, 3.0 +/- 0.2, and 3.1 +/- 0.3 ml/mmHg for healthy, GERD, and achalasia groups, respectively). Esophageal relaxation was decreased in GERD patients (Delta diameter: 0.4 +/- 0.1 cm) and increased in achalasia patients (Delta diameter: 1.3 +/- 0.4 cm) relative to healthy subjects (Delta diameter: 0.9 +/- 0.2 cm) (P < 0.05 for GERD vs. achalasia and healthy groups). Our results indicate that diseases that similarly impair phasic esophageal motility may affect esophageal tone differently.     

Noctural Asthma: Role of Nocturnal Gastroesophageal Reflux

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is common in those with asthma, with 77% of asthmatics complaining of heartburn, with 41% experiencing reflux-associated respiratory symptoms. Likewise, 24% of those with asthma that is difficult to control have “clinically silent” GER. There are no studies examining nocturnal reflux symptoms in asthmatics. Esophageal dysmotility is also common, and abnormal esophageal acid contact times on 24h esophageal pH tests were found in 82% of asthmatics examined consecutively. Most asthmatics with GER also have abnormal esophageal acid contact times while in the supine position, reflecting sleep time. Endoscopic evidence of esophagitis was found in 43% of asthmatics. Two mechanisms of bronchoconstriction induced by esophageal acid have been proposed: a vagally mediated reflex, by which esophageal acid in the distal esophagus causes reflex bronchoconstriction, and microaspiration. Although there is conflicting evidence, distal esophageal acid causes a decrease in peak expiratory flow rates, an increase in respiratory resistance, and an increase in minute ventilation. If microaspiration is present, there is further augmentation of this airway response. Although only a few studies have been performed in those with nocturnal asthma with GER, one study in a pediatric population showed that esophageal acid infusions caused more airway responses at 04:00 than at 24:00. Also, asthmatic children with nocturnal asthma symptoms have a higher re-flux score, with a positive correlation between reflux score and nighttime-associated wheezing. Despite these findings in children, a study performed in sleeping adults with nocturnal asthma noted no alterations in airflow resistance with esophageal acid, concluding that GER contributed little to the nocturnal worsening of asthma. There are also gastroesophageal circadian issues that may influence GER in asthmatics. Gastric acid secretion peaks at approximately 21:00, and gastric emptying is delayed when a meal is given at 20:00 versus 08:00. Esophageal acid clearance is delayed significantly during sleep, and acid clearance occurs during arousals. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure also decreases with sleep onset, which may predispose to microaspiration. Further research is needed to clarify what role nocturnal reflux has on nocturnal asthma and airway inflammation and whether circadian rhythm factors alter airway responses to esophageal acid.     

Sustained esophageal contraction: a motor correlate of heartburn symptom

Heartburn occurs in the presence as well as the absence of acid reflux. We searched for a motor correlate of heartburn. Twelve subjects with heartburn were studied with 24-h synchronized pressure, pH, and high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound (HFIUS) imaging of the esophagus. The HFIUS images were analyzed every 2 s for a period of 2 min before and 30 s after the onset of heartburn during 20 acid reflux-positive and 20 acid reflux-negative heartburn episodes. The esophageal muscle thickness was measured as a marker of contraction. Esophageal pressure and HFIUS images were recorded during the Bernstein test in 15 subjects. Sustained esophageal contractions (SECs) were identified during 13 of 20 heartburn episodes associated with acid reflux and 15 of 20 heartburn episodes without acid reflux. SECs were detected during 2 of 40 matched control periods only (P < 0.05). The duration of SECs was 44.9 +/- 26.9 s. The Bernstein test reproduced heartburn symptoms in 8 of 15 subjects. SECs were identified during 6 of 8 (75%) Bernstein-positive and in 1 of 7 (14.3%) Bernstein-negative tests (P = 0.04). We conclude that a SEC precedes both spontaneous and induced heartburn symptoms and may be the cause of heartburn sensation.     

Disruption of primary and secondary esophageal peristalsis by afferent stimulation

Recent studies have shown that afferent signals originating from the pharynx inhibit progression of primary esophageal peristalsis. Our aim was to further elucidate the effect of esophageal and pharyngeal afferent stimulation on primary and secondary esophageal peristalsis. We studied the effect of esophageal air distension and pharyngeal water stimulation on progression of primary and secondary peristalsis in nine healthy volunteers aged 27 +/- 2 yr (4 men, 5 women). At a threshold volume, rapid injection of water into the pharynx, directed posteriorly, resulted in complete halt of the progressing secondary and primary esophageal peristalses in both the proximal and distal esophagus. The threshold volume of injected water for inducing inhibition was similar for secondary (0.6 +/- 0.2 ml) and primary (0.5 +/- 0.1 ml) esophageal peristalsis. Progression of primary peristalsis induced by a dry swallow and secondary peristalsis induced by intraesophageal air distension were completely inhibited by intraesophageal injection of 15 +/- 2 ml of air in 70% and 75% of the trials, respectively. We conclude that afferent signals induced by esophageal air distension and pharyngeal water stimulation inhibit propagation of both primary and secondary esophageal peristalsis, suggesting a shared neural control mechanism for these types of peristalsis.     

Reduced tLESR elicitation in response to gastric distension in fundoplication patients

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (tLESRs) are vagally mediated in response to gastric cardiac distension. Nine volunteers, eight gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients, and eight fundoplication patients were studied. Manometry with an assembly that included a barostat bag was done for 1 h with and 1 h without barostat distension to 8 mmHg. Recordings were scored for tLESRs and barostat bag volume. Fundoplication patients had fewer tLESRs (0.4 +/- 0.3/h) than either normal subjects (2.4 +/- 0.5/h) or GERD patients (2.0 +/- 0.3/h). The tLESRs rate increased significantly in normal subjects (5.8 +/- 0.9/h) and GERD patients (5.4 +/- 0.8/h) during distension but not in the fundoplication group. All groups exhibited similar gastric accommodation (change in volume/change in pressure) in response to distension. Fundoplication patients exhibit a lower tLESR rate at rest and a marked attenuation of the response to gastric distension compared with either controls or GERD patients. Gastric accommodation was not impaired with fundoplication. This suggests that the receptive field for triggering tLESRs is contained within a wider field for elicitation of gastric receptive relaxation and that only the first is affected by fundoplication.     

Mechanics and hemodynamics of esophageal varices during peristaltic contraction

Our hypothesis states that variceal pressure and wall tension increase dramatically during esophageal peristaltic contractions. This increase in pressure and wall tension is a natural consequence of the anatomy and physiology of the esophagus and of the esophageal venous plexus. The purpose of this study was to evaluate variceal hemodynamics during peristaltic contraction. A simultaneous ultrasound probe and manometry catheter was placed in the distal esophagus in nine patients with esophageal varices. Simultaneous esophageal luminal pressure and ultrasound images of varices were recorded during peristaltic contraction. Maximum variceal cross-sectional area and esophageal luminal pressures at which the varix flattened, closed, and opened were measured. The esophageal lumen pressure equals the intravariceal pressure at variceal flattening due to force balance laws. The mean flattening pressures (40.11 +/- 16.77 mmHg) were significantly higher than the mean opening pressures (11.56 +/- 25.56 mmHg) (P < or = 0.0001). Flattening pressures >80 mmHg were generated during peristaltic contractions in 15.5% of the swallows. Variceal cross-sectional area increased a mean of 41% above baseline (range 7-89%, P < 0.0001) during swallowing. The peak closing pressures in patients that experience future variceal bleeding were significantly higher than the peak closing pressures in patients that did not experience variceal bleeding (P < 0.04). Patients with a mean peak closing pressure >61 mmHg were more likely to bleed. In this study, accuracy of predicting future variceal bleeding, based on these criteria, was 100%. Variceal models were developed, and it was demonstrated that during peristaltic contraction there was a significant increase in intravariceal pressure over baseline intravariceal pressure and that the peak intravariceal pressures were directly proportional to the resistance at the gastroesophageal junction. In conclusion, esophageal peristalsis in combination with high resistance to blood flow through the gastroesophageal junction leads to distension of the esophageal varices and an increase in intravariceal pressure and wall tension.     

Impaired cerebral autoregulation in obstructive sleep apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) increases the risk of stroke independent of known vascular and metabolic risk factors. Although patients with OSA have higher prevalence of hypertension and evidence of hypercoagulability, the mechanism of this increased risk is unknown. Obstructive apnea events are associated with surges in blood pressure, hypercapnia, and fluctuations in cerebral blood flow. These perturbations can adversely affect the cerebral circulation. We hypothesized that patients with OSA have impaired cerebral autoregulation, which may contribute to the increased risk of cerebral ischemia and stroke. We examined cerebral autoregulation in patients with and without OSA by measuring cerebral artery blood flow velocity (CBFV) by using transcranial Doppler ultrasound and arterial blood pressure using finger pulse photoplethysmography during orthostatic hypotension and recovery as well as during 5% CO(2) inhalation. Cerebral vascular conductance and reactivity were determined. Forty-eight subjects, 26 controls (age 41.0+/-2.3 yr) and 22 OSA (age 46.8+/-2.3 yr) free of cerebrovascular and active coronary artery disease participated in this study. OSA patients had a mean apnea-hypopnea index of 78.4+/-7.1 vs. 1.8+/-0.3 events/h in controls. The oxygen saturation during sleep was significantly lower in the OSA group (78+/-2%) vs. 91+/-1% in controls. The dynamic vascular analysis showed mean CBFV was significantly lower in OSA patients compared with controls (48+/-3 vs. 55+/-2 cm/s; P <0.05, respectively). The OSA group had a lower rate of recovery of cerebrovascular conductance for a given drop in blood pressure compared with controls (0.06+/-0.02 vs. 0.20+/-0.06 cm.s(-2).mmHg(-1); P <0.05). There was no difference in cerebrovascular vasodilatation in response to CO(2). The findings showed that patients with OSA have decreased CBFV at baseline and delayed cerebrovascular compensatory response to changes in blood pressure but not to CO(2). These perturbations may increase the risk of cerebral ischemia during obstructive apnea.     

Esophagogastric junction distensibility: a factor contributing to sphincter incompetence

To quantify the effect of hiatus hernia (HH) on esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility, eight normal subjects and nine gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with HH were studied with concurrent manometry, fluoroscopy, and stepwise controlled barostatic distention of the EGJ. The minimal barostatic pressure required to open the EGJ during the interswallow period was determined. Thereafter, barium swallows were imaged in 5-mmHg increments of intrabag pressure. EGJ diameter and length were measured at each pressure during deglutitive relaxation. The EGJ opening diameter was greater in hernia patients compared with normal subjects during deglutitive relaxation at all pressures, and EGJ length was 23% shorter. EGJ opening pressure among hernia patients was lower than normal subjects during the interswallow period. In conclusion, the EGJ of GERD patients with HH was more distensible and shorter than normal subjects. These findings partially explain why HH patients are predisposed to reflux by mechanisms other than transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations, sustain greater volumes of refluxate, and have a reduced ability to discriminate gas from liquid reflux.     

Multichannel intraluminal impedance accurately detects fasting,recumbent reflux events and their clearing

Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) is a new diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The objective of this report is to determine the accuracy of MII in detecting individual reflux events (REs) identified by pH probe and manometry, as well as their clearing in patients with severe GERD compared with normal volunteers. Ten severe GERD patients and 10 normal volunteers underwent simultaneous manometry [7 sites: gastric, lower esophageal sphincter, esophagus (4), pharynx], pH, and MII (6 sites in esophagus) for 15 min in the left and right recumbent posture while fasting. We found that patients had 30-fold more REs than normal volunteers (41 +/- 11 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.4), and 95% of all REs were detected by MII. An average 15-fold fall in impedance with liquid and fivefold rise with gas made REs and their composition easy to detect with MII. In the right recumbent posture, nearly all REs detected by MII were liquid (98%, 98/100). In contrast, all 283 REs detected by MII in the left recumbent posture were gas. Nearly all REs detected by MII were cleared (98%, 368/374). Mean acid clearing time was threefold longer (47 s) than clearing time by either manometry (15 s) or MII (13 s), primarily due to acid rereflux, i.e., additional acid REs during acid clearing. We conclude that MII is accurate in detecting REs identified by manometry and/or pH probe, their composition, and their clearing.     

Intraesophageal chemicals enhance responsiveness of upper thoracic spinal neurons to mechanical stimulation of esophagus in rats

Esophageal hypersensitivity is one of the most common causes of noncardiac chest pain in patients. In this study, we investigated whether exposure of the esophagus to acid and other chemical irritants affected activity of thoracic spinal neurons responding to esophageal distension (ED) in rats. Extracellular potentials of single thoracic (T3) spinal neurons were recorded in pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized, -paralyzed, and -ventilated male rats. ED (0.2 or 0.4 ml, 20 s) was produced by water inflation of a latex balloon placed orally into the middle thoracic region of the esophagus. The chemicals were administered via a tube that was passed through the stomach and placed in the thoracic esophagus. To irritate the esophagus, 0.2 ml of HCl (0.01 N), bradykinin (10 microg/ml), or capsaicin (10 microg/ml) were injected for 1-2 min. Only neurons excited by ED were included in this study. Results showed that intraesophageal instillation of HCl, bradykinin, and capsaicin increased activity in 3/20 (15%), 7/25 (28%), and 9/20 (45%) neurons but enhanced excitatory responses to ED in 9/17 (53%), 8/15 (53%), and 7/11 (64%) of the remaining spinal neurons, respectively. Furthermore, intraesophageal chemicals were more likely to enhance the responsiveness of low-threshold neurons than high-threshold neurons to the esophageal mechanical stimulus. Normal saline (pH 7.4, 0.2 ml) or vehicle instilled in the esophagus did not significantly affect activity or ED responses of neurons. We conclude that enhanced responses of thoracic spinal neurons to ED by the chemically challenged esophagus may provide a possible pathophysiological basis for visceral hypersensitivity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux and/or esophagitis.     

Characterization of the cerebral cortical representation of heartburn in GERD patients

Although symptoms arising from the esophagus such as heartburn and pain can at times become challenging clinical problems, esophageal viscerosensation, especially with regard to chemical stimulation in humans, is incompletely understood. Our aims were 1) to characterize and ascertain the reproducibility of cerebral cortical registration of heartburn and 2) to elucidate the differences between these findings and those of esophageal subliminal acid stimulation in asymptomatic controls. We studied 11 gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients (9 males, 30-55 yr) and 15 healthy controls (8 males, 21-49 yr). Cerebral cortical functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity was recorded twice in each subject, during two 5-min intervals of 0.1 N HCl, separated by 5 min of NaCl perfusion. Time from onset of acid perfusion to instant of fMRI signal increase and first report of heartburn averaged 1.60 +/- 0.80 and 1.85 +/- 0.60 min, respectively. Average maximum percent signal increase in the GERD patients (16.3 +/- 3.5%) was significantly greater than that of healthy controls (3.8 +/- 0.9%; P < 0.01). Temporal fMRI signal characteristics during heartburn were significantly different from those of subliminal acid stimulation in controls (P < 0.01). Activated cortical regions included sensory/motor, parieto-occipital, cingulate and prefrontal regions, and the insula. There was 92% concordance between the activated Brodmann areas in repeated studies of GERD patients. Cortical activity associated with perceived and unperceived esophageal acid exposure in GERD patients and healthy controls, respectively, involves multiple brain regions but occurs more rapidly and with greater intensity in GERD patients than the activity in response to subliminal acid exposure in healthy controls. The cortical pain-processing pathway seems to be involved in perception of esophageal acid exposure and could explain the variations encountered in clinical practice defining this sensation.     

The role of hiatus hernia in GERD

Increased esophageal acid exposure in gastroesophageal reflux disease has several potential causes, some related primarily to physiological dysfunction of the LES and others related to anatomic distortion of the gastroesophageal junction as occurs with hiatus hernia. One attractive feature of implicating hiatal hernias in the pathogenesis of reflux disease is that, like reflux disease, axial hernias become more common with age and obesity. However, the importance of hiatus hernia is obscured by imprecise definition and an all-or-none conceptualization that has led to wide variation in estimates of prevalence among normal or diseased populations. There are at least three potentially significant radiographic features of a hiatus hernia: axial length during distention, axial length at rest, and competence of the diaphragmatic hiatus. Although any or all of these features may be abnormal in a particular instance of hiatus hernia, each is of different functional significance. Grouping all abnormalities of the gastroesophageal junction as "hiatus hernia" without detailing the specifics of each case defies logic. Mechanistically, the gastroesophageal junction must protect against reflux both in static and dynamic conditions. During abrupt increases in intra-abdominal pressure, the crural diaphragm normally serves as a "second sphincter," and this mechanism is substantially impaired in individuals with a gaping hiatus. Large, non-reducing hernias also impair the process of esophageal emptying, thereby prolonging acid clearance time following a reflux event (especially while in the supine posture). These anatomically-determined functional impairments of the gastroesophageal junction lead to increased esophageal acid exposure. Thus, although hiatus hernia may or may not be an initiating factor at the inception of reflux disease, it clearly can act as a sustaining factor accounting for the frequently observed chronicity of the disease.     

Absence of a deglutitive inhibition equivalent with secondary peristalsis

This study aimed to determine the interactions between closely paired swallow-induced primary peristalsis (PP) and air injection-induced secondary peristalsis (SP). Ten subjects (7 men, 18-42 yr) were studied using a catheter, including two sleeves (upper and lower esophageal sphincters), a midesophageal infusion port, and seven esophageal and two pharyngeal recording sites. Ten iterations of PP and SP were induced by 5-ml water swallows and 20-ml intraesophageal air injections, respectively. Thereafter, the interactions between PP and SP, separated by 1- to 12-s intervals, were studied in all four possible sequences: paired swallows, swallow preceded by air injection, air injection preceded by swallow, and paired air injections. Tracings were analyzed for lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, presence and integrity of peristalsis, and event interaction. Eight subjects with success rates of both >/=90% PP and >/=80% SP were analyzed (PP 97 +/- 2%, SP 90 +/- 3%). During paired PP interactions and SP followed by PP, the first sequence was inhibited by the second with intervals < 4-6 s. However, no inhibition of the first peristaltic sequence was found in either PP followed by SP trials or SP followed by air injection. In contrast to swallowing or proximal esophageal distention, air injection into the lumen of the midesophagus does not inhibit an ongoing peristaltic event. Being that the elicitation of SP in the smooth muscle esophagus is intramurally mediated, this suggests that deglutitive inhibition is a centrally mediated phenomenon rather than an intrinsic property of peristalsis.     

Limitations of Doppler echocardiography for the post-operative evaluation of aortic coarctation.

Doppler blood flow measurements and derived pressure differences, through the Bernoulli equation, are used in the diagnosis of aortic coarctation, a congenital stenosis distal to the left subclavian artery. Doppler velocities remain elevated at the coarctation site after successful repair of coarctation, leading to high Doppler derived pressure differences without significant arm-leg pressure differences. We studied this apparent contradiction of two diagnostic methods, in vivo using patient and control data, and in vitro using a hydraulic model. Clinical and echocardiographic data from 31 patients, aged 13.0 +/- 4.0, 10.5 +/- 4.7 yr after coarctectomy by end-to-end anastomosis, and 18 age-matched healthy subjects were reviewed. Doppler peak velocities at the aortic isthmus were elevated in patients (2.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.2m/s, P < 0.001), corresponding to significant Doppler differences (20 +/- 7 mmHg), however, without significant arm-leg pressure differences. In all patients, a mild anatomic stenosis could still be observed. Local stiffness was increased. The hypothesis that the less distensible surgical scar in post-coarctectomy patients leads to a significant dynamic obstruction in systole was validated in a latex model of the aorta. Rigid rings (0.5-1.5 cm), matching the unloaded aortic diameter, were mounted around the aorta. Under loading conditions, Doppler peak velocities increased by 40 +/-7%, yielding Doppler differences of 21 +/- 3 mmHg, without a significant pressure drop. An alternative expression to calculate pressure differences, using both velocity and geometric information, was validated in the model. In conclusion, post-operatively, Doppler velocities remain elevated due to a mild anatomical and significant dynamic narrowing, but the specific geometry, resembling a tubular hypoplasia rather than an abrupt stenosis, permits an almost complete pressure recovery explaining the occurrence of Doppler differences in disagreement with the negligible arm-leg pressure difference.     

The upper esophageal sphincter in the cat: the role of central innervation assessed by transient vagal blockade

Studies were performed on four cats to assess the role of extrinsic innervation via the cervical nerve trunks in the control of upper esophageal sphincter function. Transient vagal nerve blockade was accomplished by cooling the cervical vagosympathetic nerve trunks previously isolated in skin loops on each side of the neck. Upper esophageal sphincter pressure was measured using a multilumen oval manometry tube and a rapid pull-through technique. The upper esophageal sphincter response to cervical intraesophageal balloon distention and acid perfusion was assessed. The feline upper esophageal sphincter has a distinct asymmetric pressure profile, whereby anterior pressure greater than posterior pressure greater than left pressure greater than right pressure. Bilateral vagal nerve blockade lowered the mean upper esophageal sphincter pressure from 18.5 +/- 1.5 to 12.0 +/- 2.8 mmHg (1 mmHg = 133.3 Pa) (p less than 0.001), with a significant reduction in pressure in all four quadrants. Intraesophageal balloon distention and acid perfusion both produced a significant increase in upper esophageal sphincter pressure. Bilateral vagal nerve blockade completely abolished the response of the upper esophageal sphincter to balloon distention and acid perfusion. We conclude that normal upper esophageal sphincter tone in the cat is partially mediated by excitatory neural input via the cervical nerve trunks, presumably via the recurrent laryngeal nerves; and cervical intraesophageal balloon distention and acid perfusion produce reflex contraction of the upper esophageal sphincter, which is dependent on neural pathways via the cervical vagal nerve trunks, but the relative contribution of afferent and efferent pathways remains unknown.     

Effect of somatostatin on lower esophageal sphincter (les) pressure and serum gastrin in normal and achalasic subjects

Serum gastrin and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) responses to somatostatin infusion were evaluated in ten normal subjects and in nine achalasic patients in order to determine evidence of hormonal (presumably gastrin)control of LES pressure. After somatostatin infusion, a significant decrease of serum gastrin was observed in normal subjects at 30 min (81.6 +/- 3.2 versus 40.0 +/- 4.7 pg/ml; p less than 0.01) and a rapid increase of LES pressure was also observed (26.0 +/- 1.3 versus 34.1 +/- 1.6 mmHg; p less than 0.01). In achalasia no change was observed in serum gastrin concentration after somatostatin infusion. LES pressure at 20 min however significantly decreased (45.8 +/- 7.6 versus 31.6 +/- 2.3 mmHg; p less than 0.05). Endogenous gastrin is not a major control factor for LES pressure in either normal or achalasic subjects.