Structure of the progesterone receptor-deoxyribonucleic acid complex: novel interactions required for binding to half-site response elements

The DNA binding domain (DBD) of nuclear hormone receptors contains a highly conserved globular domain and a less conserved carboxyl-terminal extension (CTE). Despite previous observations that the CTEs of some classes of nuclear receptors are structured and interact with DNA outside of the hexanucleotide hormone response element (HRE), there has been no evidence for such a CTE among the steroid receptors. We have determined the structure of the progesterone receptor (PR)-DBD-CTE DNA complex at a resolution of 2.5 A, which revealed binding of the CTE to the minor groove flanking the HREs. Alanine substitutions of the interacting CTE residues reduced affinity for inverted repeat HREs separated by three nucleotides, and essentially abrogated binding to a single HRE. A highly compressed minor groove of the trinucleotide spacer and a novel dimerization interface were also observed. A PR binding site selection experiment revealed sequence preferences in the trinucleotide spacer and flanking DNA. These results, taken together, support the notion that sequences outside of the HREs influence the DNA binding affinity and specificity of steroid receptors.     

Proposed mechanism for the stabilization of nuclear receptor DNA binding via protein dimerization.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF-4) defines a new subgroup of nuclear receptors that exist in solution and bind DNA exclusively as homodimers. We recently showed that the putative ligand binding domain (LBD) of HNF-4 is responsible for dimerization in solution and prevents heterodimerization with other receptors. In this report, the role of the LBD in DNA binding by HNF-4 is further investigated by using electrophoretic mobility shift analysis. A comparison of constructs containing either the DNA binding domain (DBD) alone or the DBD plus the LBD of HNF-4 showed that dimerization via the DBD was sufficient to provide nearly the full DNA binding affinity of the full-length HNF-4. In contrast, dimerization via the DBD was not sufficient to produce a stable protein-DNA complex, whereas dimerization via the LBD increased the half-life of the complex by at least 100-fold. Circular permutation analysis showed that full-length HNF-4 bent DNA by approximately 80 degrees while the DBD bent DNA by only 24 degrees. Nonetheless, analysis of other constructs indicated that the increase in stability afforded by the LBD could be explained only partially by an increased ability to bend DNA. Coimmunoprecipitation studies, on the other hand, showed that dimerization via the LBD produced a protein-protein complex that was much more stable than the corresponding protein-DNA complex. These results led us to propose a model in which dimerization via the LBD stabilizes the receptor on DNA by converting an energetically favorable two-step dissociation event into an energetically unfavorable single-step event. Implications of this one-step model for other nuclear receptors are discussed.     

Mechanism of high-mobility group protein B enhancement of progesterone receptor sequence-specific DNA binding

The DNA-binding domain (DBD) of progesterone receptor (PR) is bipartite containing a zinc module core that interacts with progesterone response elements (PRE), and a short flexible carboxyl terminal extension (CTE) that interacts with the minor groove flanking the PRE. The chromosomal high-mobility group B proteins (HMGB), defined as DNA architectural proteins capable of bending DNA, also function as auxiliary factors that increase the DNA-binding affinity of PR and other steroid receptors by mechanisms that are not well defined. Here we show that the CTE of PR contains a specific binding site for HMGB that is required for stimulation of PR-PRE binding, whereas the DNA architectural properties of HMGB are dispensable. Specific PRE DNA inhibited HMGB binding to the CTE, indicating that DNA and HMGB–CTE interactions are mutually exclusive. Exogenous CTE peptide increased PR-binding affinity for PRE as did deletion of the CTE. In a PR-binding site selection assay, A/T sequences flanking the PRE were enriched by HMGB, indicating that PR DNA-binding specificity is also altered by HMGB. We conclude that a transient HMGB–CTE interaction alters a repressive conformation of the flexible CTE enabling it to bind to preferred sequences flanking the PRE.     

The dimerization interfaces formed between the DNA binding domains of RXR, RAR and TR determine the binding specificity and polarity of the full-length receptors to direct repeats.

Heterodimers of retinoid X receptor (RXR) and retinoic acid receptor (RAR) bind preferentially to directly repeated elements with spacing of two (DR2) or five (DR5) base pairs, due to the specific heterocooperative interaction of their DNA binding domains (DBDs) on these elements. We have demonstrated in the accompanying paper that the heterodimeric DBD interface that is responsible for the cooperative binding to DR5 elements, specifically involves the D-box of the RXR CII finger and the tip of the RAR CI finger. We show here that a second type of dimerization interface, which specifically implicates the RAR T-box and the RXR CII finger to the exclusion of the D-box, determines the selective binding to DR2 elements. Interestingly, the same type of dimerization interface (RXR T-box and CII finger) is responsible for the cooperative binding of homodimers of the RXR DBD to DR1 elements. Based on the three-dimensional structure of the glucocorticoid receptor DBD, modeling of RXR/RAR, RXR/TR and RXR/RXR DBD cooperative interactions predicts that in all cases the DBD contributing the CII finger, i.e. that of RXR, has to be positioned 5' to its cooperatively bound partner. This binding polarity of the DBDs is conferred upon the full-length receptors, since crosslinking experiments indicate that RXR is always 5' to RAR in complexes between either DR5 or DR2 and RXR/RAR heterodimers. The possible significance of these observations for transactivation by retinoic acid receptors is discussed.     

Sequence-specific deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) recognition by steroidogenic factor 1: a helix at the carboxy terminus of the DNA binding domain is necessary for complex stability

Steroidogenic factor 1 (SF1) is a member of the NR5A subfamily of nuclear hormone receptors and is considered a master regulator of reproduction because it regulates a number of genes encoding reproductive hormones and enzymes involved in steroid hormone biosynthesis. Like other NR5A members, SF1 harbors a highly conserved approximately 30-residue segment called the FTZ-F1 box C-terminal to the core DNA binding domain (DBD) common to all nuclear receptors and binds to 9-bp DNA sequences as a monomer. Here we describe the solution structure of the SF1 DBD in complex with an atypical sequence in the proximal promoter region of the inhibin-alpha gene that encodes a subunit of a reproductive hormone. SF1 forms a specific complex with the DNA through a bipartite motif binding to the major and minor grooves through the core DBD and the N-terminal segment of the FTZ-F1 box, respectively, in a manner previously described for two other monomeric receptors, nerve growth factor-induced-B and estrogen-related receptor 2. However, unlike these receptors, SF1 harbors a helix in the C-terminal segment of the FTZ-F1 box that interacts with both the core DBD and DNA and serves as an important determinant of stability of the complex. We propose that the FTZ-F1 helix along with the core DBD serves as a platform for interactions with coactivators and other DNA-bound factors in the vicinity.     

Inhibition of DNA binding by human estrogen-related receptor 2 and estrogen receptor alpha with minor groove binding polyamides

Human estrogen-related receptor 2 (hERR2, ESRRB, ERRbeta, NR3B2) belongs to a class of nuclear receptors that bind DNA through sequence-specific interactions with a 5'-AGGTCA-3' estrogen response element (ERE) half-site in the major groove and an upstream 5'-TNA-3' site in the minor groove. This minor groove interaction is mediated by a C-terminal extension (CTE) of the DNA binding domain and is unique to the estrogen-related receptors. We have used synthetic pyrrole-imidazole polyamides, which bind specific sequences in the minor groove, to demonstrate that DNA binding by hERR2 is sensitive to the presence of polyamides in both the upstream minor groove CTE site and the minor groove of the ERE half-site. Thus, polyamides can inhibit hERR2 by two mechanisms, by direct steric blockage of minor groove DNA contacts mediated by the CTE and by changing the helical geometry of DNA such that major groove interactions are weakened. To confirm the generality of the latter approach, we show that the dimeric human estrogen receptor alpha (hERalpha, ESR1, NR3A1), which binds in the major groove of the ERE, can be inhibited by a polyamide bound in the opposing minor groove of the ERE. These results highlight two mechanisms for inhibition of protein-DNA interactions and extend the repertoire of DNA recognition motifs that can be inhibited by polyamides. These molecules may thus be useful for controlling expression of hERR2- or hERalpha-responsive genes.     

Replication protein A interactions with DNA: differential binding of the core domains and analysis of the DNA interaction surface

Human replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric (70, 32, and 14 kDa subunits), eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein required for DNA recombination, repair, and replication. The three subunits of human RPA are composed of six conserved DNA binding domains (DBDs). Deletion and mutational studies have identified a high-affinity DNA binding core in the central region of the 70 kDa subunit, composed of DBDs A and B. To define the roles of each DBD in DNA binding, monomeric and tandem DBD A and B domain chimeras were created and characterized. Individually, DBDs A and B have a very low intrinsic affinity for ssDNA. In contrast, tandem DBDs (AA, AB, BA, and BB) bind ssDNA with moderate to high affinity. The AA chimera had a much higher affinity for ssDNA than did the other tandem DBDs, demonstrating that DBD A has a higher intrinsic affinity for ssDNA than DBD B. The RPA-DNA interface is similar in both DBD A and DBD B. Mutational analysis was carried out to probe the relative contributions of the two domains to DNA binding. Mutation of polar residues in either core DBD resulted in a significant decrease in the affinity of the RPA complex for ssDNA. RPA complexes with pairs of mutated polar residues had lower affinities than those with single mutations. The decrease in affinity observed when polar mutations were combined suggests that multiple polar interactions contribute to the affinity of the RPA core for DNA. These results indicate that RPA-ssDNA interactions are the result of binding of multiple nonequivalent domains. Our data are consistent with a sequential binding model for RPA, in which DBD A is responsible for positioning and initial binding of the RPA complex while DBD A together with DBD B direct stable, high-affinity binding to ssDNA.     

Structural dynamics of the two-component response regulator RstA in recognition of promoter DNA element

The RstA/RstB system is a bacterial two-component regulatory system consisting of the membrane sensor, RstB and its cognate response regulator (RR) RstA. The RstA of Klebsiella pneumoniae (kpRstA) consists of an N-terminal receiver domain (RD, residues 1–119) and a C-terminal DNA-binding domain (DBD, residues 130–236). Phosphorylation of kpRstA induces dimerization, which allows two kpRstA DBDs to bind to a tandem repeat, called the RstA box, and regulate the expression of downstream genes. Here we report the solution and crystal structures of the free kpRstA RD, DBD and DBD/RstA box DNA complex. The structure of the kpRstA DBD/RstA box complex suggests that the two protomers interact with the RstA box in an asymmetric fashion. Equilibrium binding studies further reveal that the two protomers within the kpRstA dimer bind to the RstA box in a sequential manner. Taken together, our results suggest a binding model where dimerization of the kpRstA RDs provides the platform to allow the first kpRstA DBD protomer to anchor protein–DNA interaction, whereas the second protomer plays a key role in ensuring correct recognition of the RstA box.     

Molecular Dynamics Simulation in Solvent of the Estrogen Receptor Protein DNA Binding Domain in Complex with a Non-Consensus Estrogen Response Element DNA Sequence

Abstract

We investigated protein/DNA interactions, using molecular dynamics simulations computed between a 10 Angstom water layer model of the estrogen receptor (ER) protein DNA binding domain (DBD) amino acids and DNA of a non-consensus estrogen response element (ERE) consisting of 29 nucleotide base pairs. This ERE nucleotide sequence occurs naturally upstream of the Xenopus laevis Vitelligenin AI gene. The ER DBD is encoded by three exons. Namely, exons 2 and 3 which encode the two zinc binding motifs and a sequence of exon 4 which encodes a predicted alpha helix. We generated a computer model of the ER DBD using atomic coordinates derived from the average of 30 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy coordinate sets. Amino acids on the carboxyl end of the ER DBD were disordered in both X-ray crystallography and NMR determinations and no coordinates were reported. This disordered region includes 10 amino acids of a predicted alpha helix encoded in exon 4 at the exon 3/4 splice junction. These amino acids are known to be important in DNA binding and are also believed to function as a nuclear translocation signal sequence for the ER protein. We generated a computer model of the predicted alpha helix consisting of the 10 amino acids encoded in exon 4 and attached this helix to the carboxyl end of the ER DBD at the exon 3/4 splice junction site. We docked the ER DBD model within the DNA major groove halfsites of the 29 base pair non-consensus ERE and flanking nucleotides. We constructed a solvated model with the ER DBD/ERE complex surrounded by a ten Angstrom water layer and conducted molecular dynamics simulations. Hydrogen bonding interactions were monitored. In addition, van der Waals and electrostatic interaction energies were calculated. Amino acids of the ER DBD DNA recognition helix formed both direct and water mediated hydrogen bonds at cognate codon-anticodon nucleotide base and backbone sites within the ERE DNA right major groove halfsite. Amino acids of the ER DBD exon 4 encoded predicted alpha helix formed direct and water mediated H-bonds with base and backbone sites of their cognate codon-anticodon nucleotides within the minor grooves flanking the ERE DNA major groove halfsites. These interactions together induced bending of the DNA into the protein.     

Functional properties of the N-terminal region of progesterone receptors and their mechanistic relationship to structure

Progesterone receptors (PR) are present in two isoforms, PR-A and PR-B. The B-upstream segment (BUS) of PR-B is a 164 amino acid N-terminal extension that is missing in PR-A and is responsible for the functional differences reported between the two isoforms. BUS contains an activation function (AF3) which is defined by a core domain between residues 54–154 whose activity is dependent upon a single Trp residue and two LXXLL motifs. We have also identified sites both within and outside of BUS that repress the strong synergism between AF3 and AF1 in the N-terminal region and AF2 in the hormone binding domain. One of these repressor sites is a consensus binding motif for the small ubiquitin-like modifier protein, SUMO-1 (³⁸⁷IKEE). The DNA binding domain (DBD) structure is also important for function. When BUS is linked to the glucocorticoid receptor DBD, AF3 activity is substantially attenuated, suggesting that binding to a DNA response element results in allosteric communication between the DBD and N-terminal functional regions. Lastly, biochemical and biophysical analyses of highly purified PR-B and PR-A N-terminal regions reveal that they are unstructured unless the DBD is present. Thus, the DBD stabilizes N-terminal structure. We propose a model in which the DBD through DNA binding, and BUS through protein–protein interactions, stabilize active receptor conformers within an ensemble distribution of active and inactive conformational states. This would explain why PR-B are stronger transactivators than PR-A.     

Secondary and tertiary structural changes in gamma delta resolvase: comparison of the wild-type enzyme, the I110R mutant, and the C-terminal DNA binding domain in solution.

gamma delta Resolvase is a site-specific DNA recombinase (M(r) 20.5 kDa) in Escherichia coli that shares homology with a family of bacterial resolvases and invertases. We have characterized the secondary and tertiary structural behavior of the cloned DNA binding domain (DBD) and a dimerization defective mutant in solution. Low-salt conditions were found to destabilize the tertiary structure of the DBD dramatically, with concomitant changes in the secondary structure that were localized near the hinge regions between the helices. The molten tertiary fold appears to contribute significantly to productive DNA interactions and supports a mechanism of DNA-induced folding of the tertiary structure, a process that enables the DBD to adapt in conformation for each of the three imperfect palindromic sites. At high salt concentrations, the monomeric I110R resolvase shows a minimal perturbation to the three helices of the DBD structure and changes in the linker segment in comparison to the cloned DBD containing the linker. Comparative analysis of the NMR spectra suggest that the I110R mutant contains a folded catalytic core of approximately 60 residues and that the segment from residues 100 to 149 are devoid of regular structure in the I110R resolvase. No increase in the helicity of the linker region of I110R resolvase occurs on binding DNA. These results support a subunit rotation model of strand exchange that involves the partial unfolding of the catalytic domains.     

The nonconserved hinge region and distinct amino-terminal domains of the ROR alpha orphan nuclear receptor isoforms are required for proper DNA bending and ROR alpha-DNA interactions.

ROR alpha 1 and ROR alpha 2 are two isoforms of a novel member of the steroid-thyroid-retinoid receptor superfamily and are considered orphan receptors since their cognate ligand has yet to be identified. These putative receptors have previously been shown to bind as monomers to a DNA recognition sequence composed of two distinct moieties, a 3' nuclear receptor core half-site AGGTCA preceded by a 5' AT-rich sequence. Recognition of this bipartite hormone response element (RORE) requires both the zinc-binding motifs and a group of amino acid residues located at the carboxy-terminal end of the DNA-binding domain (DBD) which is referred to here as the carboxy-terminal extension. In this report, we show that binding of ROR alpha 1 and ROR alpha 2 to the RORE induces a large DNA bend of approximately 130 degrees which may be important for receptor function. The overall direction of the DNA bend is towards the major groove at the center of the 3' AGGTCA half-site. The presence of the nonconserved hinge region which is located between the DBD and the putative ligand-binding domain (LBD) or ROR alpha is required for maximal DNA bending. Deletion of a large portion of the amino-terminal domain (NTD) of the ROR alpha protein does not alter the DNA bend angle but shifts the DNA bend center 5' relative to the bend induced by intact ROR alpha. Methylation interference studies using the NTD-deleted ROR alpha 1 mutant indicate that some DNA contacts in the 5' AT-rich half of the RORE are also shifted 5', while those in the 3' AGGTCA half-site are unaffected. These results are consistent with a model in which the ROR alpha NTD and the nonconserved hinge region orient the zinc-binding motifs and the carboxy-terminal extension of the ROR alpha DBD relative to each other to achieve proper interactions with the two halves of its recognition site. Transactivation studies suggest that both protein-induced DNA bending and protein-protein interactions are important for receptor function.