Phylogeny and Function of the Invertebrate p53 Superfamily

The origin of the p53 superfamily predates animal evolution and first appears in unicellular Flagellates. Invertebrate p53 superfamily members appear to have a p63-like domain structure, which seems to be evolutionarily ancient. The radiation into p53, p63, and p73 proteins is a vertebrate invention. In invertebrate models amenable to genetic analysis p53 superfamily members mainly act in apoptosis regulation in response to genotoxic agents and do not have overt developmental functions. We summarize the literature on cnidarian and mollusc p53 superfamily members and focus on the function and regulation of Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans p53 superfamily members in triggering apoptosis. Furthermore, we examine the emerging evidence showing that invertebrate p53 superfamily proteins also have functions unrelated to apoptosis, such as DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint responses, compensatory proliferation, aging, autophagy, and innate immunity.The vertebrate p53 family of proteins consists of three members, p53, p63, and p73. p53 has received considerable attention because of the fact that it is mutated in approximately 50% of all human cancers and plays an important role in protecting cells against DNA damage and cellular stressors. p63 and p73 on the other hand, seem to be less involved in tumorigenesis but play important roles in epithelial development and neurogenesis, respectively. p53 related sequences also exist in invertebrate species. We review the functional data on invertebrate p53 superfamily proteins, largely focusing on the model organisms, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. Invertebrate p53 superfamily members act in apoptosis regulation in response to genotoxic agents and the deletion of invertebrate p53 superfamily proteins does not lead to overall developmental defects. Nevertheless, there is emerging evidence that invertebrate p53-like proteins also have functions unrelated to apoptosis.There has been a debate whether invertebrate p53 superfamily proteins are phylogenetically more related to vertebrate p53 or p63. Taking advantage of recent genome sequencing projects, we analyze the phylogenetic relationships of the p53 superfamily from vertebrates and invertebrates. Consistent with previous reports, our phylogenetic analysis supports the conclusion that a p63-like domain structure is evolutionarily more ancient. It thus appears that a protein with a p63-like domain structure originally evolved, possibly to mediate apoptosis of damaged cells. In vertebrates, this earlier role of p53-like proteins is largely performed by p53. However, it appears that p63 has maintained the evolutionary ancient role of apoptosis in the female germline (Suh et al. 2006)     

p53 Family members p63 and p73 are SAM domain-containing proteins.

Homologs of the tumor suppressor p53, called p63 and p73, have been identified. The p63 and p73 family members possess a domain structure similar to p53, but contain variable C-terminal extensions. We find that some of the C-terminal extensions contain Sterile Alpha Motif (SAM) domains. SAM domains are protein modules that are involved in protein-protein interactions. Consistent with this role, the C-terminal SAM domains of the p63 and p73 may regulate function by recruiting other protein effectors.     

Structural diversity of p63 and p73 isoforms

AbstractThe p53 protein family is the most studied protein family of all. Sequence analysis and structure determination have revealed a high similarity of crucial domains between p53, p63 and p73. Functional studies, however, have shown a wide variety of different tasks in tumor suppression, quality control and development. Here we review the structure and organization of the individual domains of p63 and p73, the interaction of these domains in the context of full-length proteins and discuss the evolutionary origin of this protein family. Facts

• Distinct physiological roles/functions are performed by specific isoforms.
• The non-divided transactivation domain of p63 has a constitutively high activity while the transactivation domains of p53/p73 are divided into two subdomains that are regulated by phosphorylation.
• Mdm2 binds to all three family members but ubiquitinates only p53.
• TAp63α forms an autoinhibited dimeric state while all other vertebrate p53 family isoforms are constitutively tetrameric.
• The oligomerization domain of p63 and p73 contain an additional helix that is necessary for stabilizing the tetrameric states. During evolution this helix got lost independently in different phylogenetic branches, while the DNA binding domain became destabilized and the transactivation domain split into two subdomains.

Open questions

• Is the autoinhibitory mechanism of mammalian TAp63α conserved in p53 proteins of invertebrates that have the same function of genomic quality control in germ cells?
• What is the physiological function of the p63/p73 SAM domains?
• Do the short isoforms of p63 and p73 have physiological functions?
• What are the roles of the N-terminal elongated TAp63 isoforms, TA* and GTA?

Subject terms: X-ray crystallography, Solution-state NMR     

Structural evolution of C-terminal domains in the p53 family

The tetrameric state of p53, p63, and p73 has been considered one of the hallmarks of this protein family. While the DNA binding domain (DBD) is highly conserved among vertebrates and invertebrates, sequences C-terminal to the DBD are highly divergent. In particular, the oligomerization domain (OD) of the p53 forms of the model organisms Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila cannot be identified by sequence analysis. Here, we present the solution structures of their ODs and show that they both differ significantly from each other as well as from human p53. CEP-1 contains a composite domain of an OD and a sterile alpha motif (SAM) domain, and forms dimers instead of tetramers. The Dmp53 structure is characterized by an additional N-terminal beta-strand and a C-terminal helix. Truncation analysis in both domains reveals that the additional structural elements are necessary to stabilize the structure of the OD, suggesting a new function for the SAM domain. Furthermore, these structures show a potential path of evolution from an ancestral dimeric form over a tetrameric form, with additional stabilization elements, to the tetramerization domain of mammalian p53.     

Conservation of all three p53 family members and Mdm2 and Mdm4 in the cartilaginous fish

Analysis of the genome of the elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii), a member of the cartilaginous fishes (class Chondrichthyes), reveals that it encodes all three members of the p53 gene family, p53, p63 and p73, each with clear homology to the equivalent gene in bony vertebrates (class Osteichthyes). Thus, the gene duplication events that lead to the presence of three family members in the vertebrates dates to before the Silurian era. It also encodes Mdm2 and Mdm4 genes but does not encode the p19^Arf gene. Detailed comparison of the amino acid sequences of these proteins in the vertebrates reveals that they are evolving at highly distinctive rates, and this variation occurs not only between the three family members but extends to distinct domains in each protein.Key words: p53, p63, p73, Mdm2, Mdm4, elephant shark     

Structural basis of p63α SAM domain mutants involved in AEC syndrome

p63 is a member of the p53 tumour suppressor family that includes p73. The p63 gene encodes a protein comprising an N-terminal transactivation domain, a DNA binding domain and an oligomerization domain, but varies in the organization of the C-terminus as a result of complex alternative splicing. p63α contains a C-terminal sterile α motif (SAM) domain that is thought to function as a protein-protein interaction domain. Several missense and heterozygous frame shift mutations, encoded within exon 13 and 14 of the p63 gene, have been identified in the p63α SAM domain in patients suffering from ankyloblepharon-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting syndrome. Here we report the solution and high resolution crystal structures of the p63α SAM domain and investigate the effect of several mutations (L553F/V, C562G/W, G569V, Q575L and I576T) on the stability of the domain. The possible effects of other mutations are also discussed.     

Conservation of all three p53 family members and Mdm2 and Mdm4 in the cartilaginous fish

Analysis of the genome of the elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii), a member of the cartilaginous fishes (Class Chondrichthyes), reveals that it encodes all three members of the p53 gene family, p53, p63 and p73, each with clear homology to the equivalent gene in bony vertebrates (Class Osteichthyes). Thus, the gene duplication events that lead to the presence of three family members in the vertebrates dates to before the Silurian era. It also encodes Mdm2 and Mdm4 genes but does not encode the p19^Arf gene. Detailed comparison of the amino acid sequences of these proteins in the vertebrates reveals that they are evolving at highly distinctive rates, and this variation occurs not only between the three family members but extends to distinct domains in each protein.     

The Fatty Acid Synthase Gene is a Conserved p53 Family Target Gene from Worm to Human

The discovery that the p53 family consists of three members (p53, p63 and p73) in vertebrates and of a single homolog in invertebrates has raised the challenge of understanding the functions of the ancestor and how they have evolved and differentiated within the duplicated genes in vertebrates. Here, we report that the fatty acid synthase (FAS) gene, encoding for a key enzyme involved in the biogenesis of membrane lipids in rapidly proliferating cells, is a conserved target of the p53 family throughout the evolution. We show that CEP-1, the C. elegans p53 homolog, is able to bind the two p53 family responsive elements (REs) identified in the worm fasn-1 gene. Moreover, we demonstrate that fasn-1 expression is modulated by CEP-1 in vivo, by comparing wild-type and CEP-1 knockout worms. In human, luciferase and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate that TAp73α and ΔNp63α, but not p53, TAp73β and TAp63α bind the two p53 REs of the human FASN gene. We show that the ectopic expression of TAp73β and ΔNp63α leads to an increase of FASN mRNA levels, while their silencing produces a decrease of FASN expression. Furthermore, we present data showing a correlation between ΔNp63α and FASN expression in cellular proliferation. Of relevant importance is that fasn-1 is the first CEP-1 direct target gene identified so far in C. elegans and our results suggest a new CEP-1 role in cellular proliferation and development, besides the one already described in apoptosis of germ cells. These data confirm the hypothesis that the ancestral functions of the single invertebrate gene may have been spread out among the three vertebrate members, each of them have acquired specific role in cell cycle regulation.     

p73 and p63 are homotetramers capable of weak heterotypic interactions with each other but not with p53.

Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene are the most frequent genetic alterations found in human cancers. Recent identification of two human homologues of p53 has raised the prospect of functional interactions between family members via a conserved oligomerization domain. Here we report in vitro and in vivo analysis of homo- and hetero-oligomerization of p53 and its homologues, p63 and p73. The oligomerization domains of p63 and p73 can independently fold into stable homotetramers, as previously observed for p53. However, the oligomerization domain of p53 does not associate with that of either p73 or p63, even when p53 is in 15-fold excess. On the other hand, the oligomerization domains of p63 and p73 are able to weakly associate with one another in vitro. In vivo co-transfection assays of the ability of p53 and its homologues to activate reporter genes showed that a DNA-binding mutant of p53 was not able to act in a dominant negative manner over wild-type p73 or p63 but that a p73 mutant could inhibit the activity of wild-type p63. These data suggest that mutant p53 in cancer cells will not interact with endogenous or exogenous p63 or p73 via their respective oligomerization domains. It also establishes that the multiple isoforms of p63 as well as those of p73 are capable of interacting via their common oligomerization domain.     

Interrelations between p73 and p53: a model, neuroblastoma

Homologies in sequence and gene organization of p53 and their relatives, p73 and p63, suggest similar biological functions. However differences exist between the p53 family members. Indeed in human tumors p53 is often mutated while p63 and p73 are very rarely mutated. In addition, in contrast to p53 which is transcribed in a unique mRNA species spanning all gene exons, each homologue expresses two types of isoforms: some with transactivation domain (TAD) showing tumor suppressive properties, the others deprived of TAD, with oncogenic properties. If p53 responds to immediate genotoxic stress, its homologues participate to the cell homeostasis of specific tissues along their development and differentiation, neuronal tissue for p73, epithelial for p63. However a collaboration between the three p53 family members has been shown to occur in response to cell genotoxic damages. Neuroblastic tumors characterized by a large spectrum of neuronal differentiation constitute a good model to study relationship between p73 and p53 as well as the regulation of their respective expression.     

High thermostability and lack of cooperative DNA binding distinguish the p63 core domain from the homologous tumor suppressor p53

The p53 protein is the major tumor suppressor in mammals. The discovery of the p53 homologs p63 and p73 defined a family of p53 members with distinct roles in tumor suppression, differentiation, and development. Here, we describe the biochemical characterization of the core DNA-binding domain of a human isoform of p63, p63-delta, and particularly novel features in comparison with p53. In contrast to p53, the free p63 core domain did not show specific binding to p53 DNA consensus sites. However, glutathione S-transferase-fused and thus dimerized p63 and p53 core domains had similar affinity and specificity for the p53 consensus sites p21, gadd45, cyclin G, and bax. Furthermore, the fold of p63 core was remarkably stable compared with p53 as judged by differential scanning calorimetry (T(m) = 61 degrees C versus 44 degrees C for p53) and equilibrium unfolding ([urea](50%) = 5.2 m versus 3.1 m for p53). A homology model of p63 core highlights differences at a segment near the H1 helix hypothetically involved in the formation of the dimerization interface in p53, which might reduce cooperativity of p63 core DNA binding compared with p53. The model also shows differences in the electrostatic and hydrophobic potentials of the domains relevant to folding stability.