Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques

Nipple-areola reconstruction represents the final stage of breast reconstruction, whereby a reconstructed breast mound is transformed into a breast facsimile that more closely resembles the original breast. Although numerous nipple reconstruction techniques are available, all have been plagued by eventual loss of long-term projection. In this report, the authors present a comparative assessment of nipple and areola projection after reconstruction using either a bell flap, a modified star flap, or a skate flap and full-thickness skin graft for areola reconstruction. The specific technique for nipple-areola reconstruction following breast reconstruction was selected on the basis of the projection of the contralateral nipple and whether or not the opposite areola showed projection. Patients with 5 mm or less of opposite nipple projection were treated with either the bell flap or the modified star flap. In patients where the areola complex exhibited significant projection, a bell flap was chosen over the modified star flap. In those patients with greater than 5-mm nipple projection, reconstruction with a skate flap and full-thickness skin graft was performed. Maintenance of nipple projection in each of these groups was then carefully assessed over a 1-year period of follow-up using caliper measurements of nipple and areola projection obtained at 3-month intervals. The best long-term nipple projection was obtained and maintained by the skate and star techniques. The major decrease in projection of the reconstructed nipple occurred during the first 3 months. After 6 months, the projection was stable. The loss of both nipple and areola projection when using the bell flap was so remarkable that the authors would discourage the use of this procedure in virtually all patients.     

Cryopreserved autologous nipple-areola complex transfer to the reconstructed breast

If a patient's nipple-areola complex is available for grafting after mastectomy, it is the best material to use for nipple-areola reconstruction. The authors performed delayed autologous nipple-areola complex transfer to reconstructed breasts in 10 patients (mean age, 47 years; range, 40 to 53 years). The nipple-areola complex was cryopreserved with a programmed freezer after mastectomy. Histological examination of the tissue surrounding the nipple and areola eliminated the possibility of cancer invasion. At the time of transfer, the cryopreserved nipple-areola complex was thawed in 37 degrees C water and grafted on a projection made by a denuded dermal flap on the reconstructed breast. Each patient underwent immediate breast reconstruction using an innervated pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap. The patients' postoperative courses were uneventful. The timing of transfer ranged from 3 months to 1 year (mean, 5.8 months) after breast reconstruction. Nipple projection was made by the "four" dermal flap in five cases, a round dermal flap in three cases, a double dermal flap in one case, and a denuded skate flap in one case. The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 36 months (mean, 21.8 months). All grafts were adapted. The final evaluation of nipple-areola complex adaptation was good in four cases, fair in four cases, and poor in two cases. Histological examination of the hematoxylin and eosin stains showed no remarkable destruction of the skin of the nipple and areola, and electron microscopic examination of the areola skin revealed no significant change. However, electron microscopic examination of the nipple skin showed serious damage to skin components, including elongation of the desmosome, widening of the intercellular space at the prickle cell and basal layers, and shrinking of prickle and basal cells. Although further development of the freezing process and cryopreservation technique is needed to prevent depigmentation of the nipple and areola, cryopreserved nipple-areola complex transfer to a reconstructed breast could be an alternative method of nipple-areola reconstruction.     

Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction

The main objective of this study was to examine the relationship between specific treatment variables and patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. A questionnaire was developed that included questions on population demographics and satisfaction with the reconstruction. Of 206 women who completed the questionnaire, 23 (11.2 percent) responded that they were not satisfied, whereas 183 (88.8 percent) indicated that they were satisfied overall. A detailed retrospective chart review permitted a comparison of the treatment received by these two groups. Variables analyzed included patient age, time since surgery, reason for surgery, method and timing of reconstruction, additional surgical procedures received (mound revisions and nipple-areola complex reconstruction), and postoperative complications. Data analysis showed that the treatment received by the two groups was similar in many respects. There was no statistical association between the method or timing of reconstruction and a patient's satisfaction with the results. Furthermore, there was no difference in the number of mound revisions or nipple reconstructions performed on satisfied versus dissatisfied patients. However, the latter group experienced a substantially higher incidence of postsurgical complications (27 percent versus 61 percent, p = 0.0015). Patients were also asked to provide a written response explaining their feelings on breast reconstruction. Satisfied patients described benefits from reconstruction such as improved appearance or feelings of normalcy and wholeness. Conversely, unsatisfied patients were displeased because of poor cosmetic results, complications with the reconstructed breast, or abdominal problems. Although overall satisfaction with breast reconstruction is undoubtedly determined by multiple and complex clinical, emotional, and psychological factors, this study suggests that postoperative complications are a particularly important indicator of dissatisfaction with reconstruction.     

Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction.

The creation of the nipple-areola complex is often the final step in the surgical treatment of breast cancer patients, and it consequently has important symbolic and aesthetic implications. Patient expectations and the need for symmetry make nipple projection a crucial aesthetic determinant of nipple reconstruction. We hypothesize that long-term nipple projection and shape can be achieved in a predictable fashion using the modified star dermal fat flap technique. Prospectively, 93 nipples were reconstructed by a single surgeon using a modified star dermal fat flap technique in 44 implant and 49 TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Flap dimensions (base diameter and flap length) were designed according to patient desire or to the base diameter and projection of the opposite breast nipple. A standardized, 3-month postoperative care regimen was observed in all patients. Nipple projection was assessed by the same observer at each follow-up examination. The average length of follow-up was 730 days (745 for TRAM reconstructions and 713 for implants). Consistently, an average of 41 percent of the intraoperative projection remained intact in both groups at final evaluation (SD 12 percent). The total flap length was strongly predictive of intraoperative and long-term projection (r = 0.64 and 0.86, p < 0.0001). Flap lengths ranged from 5.5 to 9.0 cm, and in a linear correlation, resulted in intraoperative projection of 1.0 to 2.1 cm, respectively, and long-term projection of 0.4 to 0.83 cm, respectively. Based on the linear relationship, every 1-cm increase in flap length could be expected to result in a 0.16-cm increase in projection. When controlled for flap length and intraoperative projection, there was no difference between TRAM and implant nipple reconstruction in predicting postoperative nipple projection. Intraoperative planning and execution are critical to achieve predictable nipple shape, size, and projection. The dimensions of the star dermal fat flap can be strategically modified to allow the surgeon predictable projection with a consistent 41-percent preservation of intraoperative nipple projection in both TRAM and implant patients at 2 years.     

即时扩展型背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造在保留乳头乳晕复合体乳癌术后的运用分析

目的：探讨分析即时扩展型背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造在保留乳头乳晕复合体乳癌术后的运用。方法：回顾性分析我院2008年2月-2012年4月收治的乳腺癌术后患者106例,采用乳癌术即时扩展型背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造保留乳头乳晕复合体,观察手术效果以及满意度。结果：术后患者乳房美容优良率为88．68％明显大于对照组的47．17％,并且术后6个月治疗组生活质量评价总分明显大于对照组总分术后6个月患者生活质量评价总分明显大于术前评价总分,差异具有条件下意义（P〈0．05）,差异均具有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论：即时扩展型背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造在保留乳头乳晕复合体乳癌术后患者乳房美容效果较好,提高患者生活质量高,值得在临床上推广,但在手术后需积极处理可能存在的并发症情况。     

Investigation into the possible cause of subjective decreased sensory perception in the nipple-areola complex of women with macromastia

Patients with macromastia often comment on a lack of sensation in their nipple-areola complex. A study was designed to investigate the cause of this decreased sensation. Two hypotheses were proposed. First, the decreased sensation could result from neuropraxia of the sensory nerve fibers secondary to traction caused by the heavy breast parenchyma. The second hypothesis proposed that tissue expansion of the nipple and areola by the voluminous breast parenchyma caused a decrease in nerve fibers per surface area and hence decreased sensory perception. Sixty-one patients were assessed in the study. All patients underwent surgery in which histological biopsy of either the areola alone (31 reduction mammaplasty patients) or the nipple and areola (30 mastectomy patients) was possible. Before surgery, each nipple-areola complex was tested with Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test monofilaments as a quantitative test of tactile sensation. Breast cup size, ptosis, and weight of tissue excised were recorded to allow general assessment of the breast size. The nipple and areola biopsy specimens were assessed using immunohistochemistry (S-100 polyclonal antibody, Dako Z311) to measure nerve fiber count per unit area. Statistical analysis was undertaken to find any association among sensitivity, breast cup size, ptosis, weight of tissue resected, and nerve fiber density in the nipple and areola biopsy specimens. Sensitivity at the areola decreased with increasing breast cup size (r = 0.47, p < 0.001) and ptosis (r = 0.42, p = 0.002 for increasing distance between inframammary crease and nipple; r = 0.49, p < 0.001 for increasing manubrium to nipple distance). There was a weak correlation between nerve fiber density at the areola and breast cup size (r = -0.22, p = 0.1). Sensitivity at the nipple was higher than at the areola. Nerve fiber density count at the nipple was higher than at the areola, but there was no statistically significant correlation between nipple sensitivity and breast cup size, ptosis, or weight of tissue resected. The results suggest that the areola and nipple are different in their neuroanatomy. The areola is a thin, pliable structure that is predisposed to stretch as the breast enlarges and therefore experience a decrease in nerve fiber density. The nipple is a compact structure that is less likely to stretch with breast enlargement. In the nipple, neither sensory perception nor nerve fiber density varied with size or breast ptosis. The perceived lack of sensation in the nipple-areola complex is multifactorial. This study shows that neither traction injury to the sensory nerves nor decreased nerve density alone can explain the subjective numbness reported by patients with macromastia. Psychological factors, such as dissatisfaction with body form or interpretation of lack of sensation in the areola as also affecting the nipple, may influence the patient's assessment of the nipple-areola sensitivity.     

Reconstruction of the burned nipple-areola complex

Reconstructive results of 115 burned nipple-areola complexes in 84 female patients were reviewed. Results of nipple reconstruction using local quadrapod flaps (33 percent good, 45 percent fair, 22 percent poor) and composition grafts from the earlobe (20 percent good, 60 percent fair, 20 percent poor) were comparable, and both were superior to results obtained with the "double-bubble" technique (24 percent good, 35 percent fair, 41 percent poor). Differences in nipple reconstruction techniques were not appreciated until 1 year postoperatively. The early appearance of areola reconstruction with tattooing and split-thickness grafts was excellent. However, significant late hypopigmentation changes were observed with both techniques. Areola reconstruction with full-thickness skin grafts from the superomedial thigh (47 percent good, 33 percent fair, 20 percent poor) were superior to those obtained with tattooing (14 percent good, 35 percent fair, 51 percent poor) and split-thickness skin grafts from the contralateral unburned areola (21 percent good, 21 percent fair, 58 percent poor). We recommend employing local quadrapod flaps (for nipple), provided there is adequate surrounding dermis, and full-thickness skin grafts (for areola) in the reconstruction of the burned breast.     

TRAM flap versus nonautologous breast reconstruction: what do patients really think?

Although there have been many reports of aesthetic outcomes after breast reconstruction, there have been comparatively few studies examining patient satisfaction and related subjective issues. The variables affecting satisfaction are only beginning to be understood, and patient satisfaction issues were explored in a more homogeneous patient population. A questionnaire surveying overall and aesthetic satisfaction, postoperative recuperation time, and symptoms was used to elicit candid patient responses. Fifty-seven patients replied (86 percent response rate), of whom 38 had undergone transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (pedicled, n = 29; free, n = 9) reconstruction and 19 had undergone nonautologous reconstruction. Although the median patient satisfaction score was higher for the TRAM flap group, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.92). Recuperation was significantly longer for the TRAM flap group, with only 47 percent of patients being able to resume full activities within 2 months after the surgical procedure, compared with 95 percent of the implant group (p = 0.002). Of the TRAM flap-treated patients, 50 percent described some postoperative abdominal weakness, but only 5 percent of all TRAM flap-treated patients said that abdominal weakness was actually a functional problem. Our results suggest that patients may derive equal satisfaction with the two methods of reconstruction. The postoperative recuperation time after TRAM flap reconstruction is significantly longer than that after nonautologous procedures, although the postoperative abdominal weakness after TRAM flap reconstruction is not as significant a clinical problem as previously thought. The patient-derived information on satisfaction should assist both surgeons and patients in matching reconstructive options with patients' expectations and lifestyle.     

Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: a long-term evaluation

Numerous procedures are available for nipple reconstruction with no true universal favorite. This study presents long-term follow-up data for nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique. Patients were identified by searching the Breast Reconstruction Database, and they were asked to return for a follow-up visit. All those who underwent nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique between January of 1992 and December of 1996 were reviewed in an attempt to conduct a long-term follow-up evaluation. The response was poor, and 11 patients participated in the study and returned for follow-up. They all completed a questionnaire, which focused on patient satisfaction using a visual analogue scale. Nipple measurements were taken with a caliper and compared with the opposite breast for symmetry. Fourteen nipple reconstructions were evaluated in 11 patients with an average follow-up of 5.3 years. All patients had undergone transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions. Patient satisfaction was 42 percent with nipple projection, 62 percent with pigmentation, and 26 percent with sensation. Overall patient satisfaction with the procedure was 81 percent. Average nipple projection of the reconstructed nipple was 3.77 mm and was not statistically different when compared with the opposite nipple. Long-term subjective evaluation of the C-V flap technique does report a loss in nipple projection; however, overall patient satisfaction at 5.3 years is good, as is the ability to restore symmetry with the opposite breast.     

Complete one-stage,immediate breast reconstruction with prosthetic material in patients with large or ptotic breasts

Immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction is a relatively simple, quick procedure with no donor site morbidity. This report discusses immediate one-stage breast reconstruction using prostheses in 18 patients (19 breasts) who also required a contralateral reduction or mastopexy. In all cases, an inverted-T pattern was applied to both breasts. The mean age of the patients was 49 years (range, 32 to 62 years), and the mean size of the gel implant used was 330 ml (range, 120 to 550 ml); the implant was inserted in a total submuscular pocket in seven patients and subcutaneously in 11 patients. In two patients with multiple risk factors, the prosthesis extruded, and one patient required removal for a periprosthetic infection. In 10 patients with early stage disease (T1 or T2) with tumors more than 5 cm from the nipple-areola complex, the original areola (n = 3) or nipple-areola complex (n = 7) was retained as a full-thickness skin graft.The breast shape after submuscular prosthesis insertion is different than that of the contralateral breast after a mastopexy or reduction, and nipple-areola complex symmetry was difficult to obtain; thus, this technique was abandoned in favor of the subcutaneous position (using a modified Wise keyhole pattern with a de-epithelialized portion, which still allows two-layer closure).In the subgroup of patients with large breasts or marked ptosis, a single-stage breast reconstruction procedure can be performed with symmetrical incisions. The subcutaneous position allows for symmetrical shape and nipple-areola complex symmetry to be obtained. When the tumors are small and situated in the periphery of the breast, the nipple-areola complex may be retained as a full-thickness graft.     

Single-stage, autologous breast restoration

The skin-sparing mastectomy, when performed with immediate reconstruction, is a major advance in breast reconstruction. Traditionally, reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex is performed as a subsequent procedure. In this study, 17 patients (mean age, 43 years; range, 35 to 53 years) underwent one-stage breast and nipple-areola reconstruction over a 21-month period. In all cases of breast reconstruction, a buried transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap was used, and all patients had a simultaneous nipple-areola complex reconstruction performed. Nine patients had a Wise keyhole pattern used and contralateral reduction performed. Four patients retained all their breast skin, and a TRAM skin island was used in another four. It has recently been shown that patients with early-stage breast cancer and peripherally sited tumors have a very low risk of nipple-areola involvement. In 10 patients with early disease and peripheral tumors, the areola was retained (as a thin full-thickness graft), but more recently, in three patients with early-stage disease, the entire nipple-areola complex was used as a thin full-thickness graft. The thin full-thickness skin graft is removed from the breast in an apple-coring fashion, so that most of the ducts are retained as part of the mastectomy specimen. (There was histological confirmation of absence of tumor in the nipples of these patients.)One-stage autologous reconstruction should be considered for all patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction. In patients with early-stage disease and peripheral tumors, the nipple-areola complex may be retained through the use of a thin full-thickness graft that is applied to a deepithelialized CV flap on the TRAM flap. This allows the best method of nipple-areola complex reconstruction: by retaining the original breast envelope, the color match and texture in the reconstruction are ideal. Patient satisfaction in this study was high. Necrosis of the mastectomy flaps impaired the cosmetic results in some patients. A large multicenter study is required to confirm the effectiveness of this procedure.     

Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction

In today's increasingly competitive health care marketplace, consumer satisfaction has become an important measure of quality. Furthermore, measures of satisfaction with treatment inteerventions are influential factors in determining patients' and payers' choices of health care. This study sought to evaluate satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction and to assess the effects of procedure type and timing on patient satisfaction. As part of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study, patients undergoing first-time mastectomy reconstruction were prospectively evaluated, including cohorts of women choosing expander/implant, pedicle TRFAM flap, and free TRAM flap procedures. Preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, participants completed a questionnaire that collected a variety of health status information. The postoperative questionnaire had an additional seven items assessing both general satisfaction with reconstruction (five items) and aesthetic satisfaction (two items) as separate subscales. Patients were asked to respond to each item using a five-point Likert scale. Item responses ranged from 1, indicating high satisfaction, to 5, reflecting low satisfaction. In the data analysis, only patients responding with a 1 or 2 for all of the items within a subscale were classified as "satisfied" for the subscale. To assess the effects of procedure type (implant, pedicle TRAM flap, and free TRAM flap) and timing (immediate versus delayed) on satisfaction and to control for possible confounding effects from other independent variables, multiple logistic regression was employed. In our analysis, odds ratios and associated 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated for each independent variable in the regression. Statistical significance was designated at the p < or = 0.05 level. A total of 212 patients were followed during the period of 1994 to 1997, including 141 immediate and 71 delayed reconstructions. The study population consisted of 49 expander/implant, 102 pedicle TRAM flap, and 61 free TRAM flap reconstruction patients. The analysis showed a significant association between procedure type and patient satisfaction. TRAM flap patients (both free and pedicle) appeared to have significantly greater general and aesthetic satisfaction compared with expander/implant patients (p = 0.03 and 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, pedicle TRAM flap patients were more aesthetically satisfied than those with free TRAM flaps (p = 0.072). The other independent variables of age and procedure timing did not appear to significantly affect either general or aesthetic satisfaction. However, preoperative physical activity was positively correlated with general satisfaction at the p = 0.034 level. The choice of procedure seems to have a significant effect on both aesthetic and general patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. In this study, autogenous tissue reconstructions produced higher levels of patient aesthetic and general satisfaction compared with implant techniques. Pedicle and free TRAM flap patients do not seem to differ significantly in general satisfaction. However, women receiving pedicle TRAM flaps reported greater aesthetic satisfaction compared with patients undergoing free TRAM flaps. Furthermore, patient age and procedure timing may not have an effect on patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction.     

Evaluation of the factors related to postmastectomy breast reconstruction

A retrospective study was conducted in 75 consecutive patients requiring postmastectomy breast reconstruction over a period of 30 months. Each woman was offered one of the following four reconstructive options: free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (total number of reconstructions, n = 34); latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (with or without expander and implant, n = 14); endoscopically assisted harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle (with expander and implant, n = 13); and application of expander and implant only (n = 12).Of those patients originally selected for retrospective study, six did not meet the short-term prognostic criteria, and concerted attempts to contact two others proved unsuccessful. The remaining 67 patients were examined for the clinically assessed aesthetic appearance of the reconstructed breast(s), the subjective self-assessment of patient satisfaction, and the possible development of postoperative complications. Of these patients, six required bilateral surgery, which accounts for a final sample size of 73 individual breast reconstructions. The 67 individual patients were assessed after a minimum time of 6 months postreconstruction and became the sampling units for analysis.The free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap procedure was the preferred method of breast reconstruction in 34 of 73 patients (47 percent), provided that it was generally agreed that the patient could endure a prolonged operation and that there was sufficient unscarred abdominal tissue available. Thereafter, postmastectomy radiotherapy at the chest wall became the primary criterion for assignment of a patient to a particular surgical procedure. Whenever radiotherapy resulted in poor-quality skin at the chest wall, endoscopically assisted transfer of latissimus dorsi muscle flap was considered to be the optimal treatment (13 of 73 patients, or 18 percent). Body mass index and smoking were secondary factors that were taken into account when this alternative technique was being considered.In the absence of radiotherapy, and provided that the chest wall was minimally scarred, patients who were reluctant to have reconstruction with autologous tissue were treated with expander and implant only (12 of 73, or 16 percent). This third procedure is a physically less arduous ordeal for the patient and was therefore the choice for all patients for whom a prolonged operation was not a realistic option. The fourth (and final) surgical procedure, latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (with or without expander and implant), was selected for all patients with a better quality of skin over the chest wall, those whose abdomen was extensively scarred, and those who were on a general surgeon's operating list to undergo immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy (14 of 73, or 19 percent).Equally good aesthetic results could be demonstrated with each of the four treatment options, provided that the reconstructive procedure selected was optimal for the individual patient and in accordance with the criteria described above. A variety of potential risk factors were considered for association with postoperative complications, including prescribed medication, obesity, smoking behavior, use of radiotherapy, and the recorded aggregated operative time. Of these, only body mass index (p < 0.001) and use of steroids (p = 0.016) were identified as having statistically significant effects on the incidence of adverse events.Finally, the general level of satisfaction expressed by the patient was highly correlated with a good appearance of the reconstructed breast, the physical comfort experienced while wearing a brassiere, and the general mobility of the unsupported reconstruction.     

Integrated breast mound reduction and nipple reconstruction with the wraparound flap.

A new method for nipple reconstruction is described that combines revision of an autologous tissue breast mound with creation of a projecting nipple. The method is applicable only to reconstructed breast mounds that must be reduced or lifted to achieve symmetry with the opposite breast. In this technique, the mound is reduced as if it were a normal breast, using an inverted-T or vertical mammaplasty pattern. In this way, breast projection can be increased and, if necessary, the inframammary fold can be elevated. A rectangular flap is created from skin and subcutaneous tissue that would normally be discarded during the breast reduction, and this flap is wrapped around on itself to form a projecting nipple. This new technique avoids the flattening of the breast mound usually seen after nipple reconstruction because it does not take tissue away from the completed breast mound to make the nipple. In appropriate patients who require reduction in size of their reconstructed breast mound, the wraparound flap nipple reconstruction is worth considering.     

Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty

Breast sensation after reduction mammaplasty is a major concern for surgeons and patients. The sensitivity of 80 breasts that were reduced using Lejour's technique (a superior dermoglandular pedicle with resection at the lower quadrants) was assessed in a prospective study. Ten points were selected on each breast for this study, including the nipple, four points on the areola, and five points on the breast skin. The measurements were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Pressure thresholds were measured with 20 Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, temperature sensitivity with hot and cold metal probes, vibratory thresholds with the Biotesiometer, and static and moving two-point discrimination tests with a Disk-Criminator. To assess the influence of breast ptosis and hypertrophy on sensitivity, the population was divided into two groups. In group I (19 patients), the sternal notch-to-nipple distance was less than 29 cm, and less than 500 g of tissue per breast was removed. In group II (21 patients), the sternal notch-to-nipple distance was more than 29 cm, and more than 500 g of tissue was resected. The sensitivity on the nipple and areola was significantly decreased at 3 and 6 months postoperatively for all modalities. At 1 year, sensitivity recovered, and no breast or nipple-areola complex was insensitive. Pressure sensitivity was not significantly different from the preoperative measurement in any area of the breast or in either group of patients, except for superior breast skin, for which sensitivity was improved in group II (p = 0.0004). Temperature sensitivity in group I was not different preoperatively and postoperatively, but in group II, a significant decrease was observed in sensitivity for the nipple and areola (p = 0.01 and 0.004, respectively). Vibratory sensitivity was significantly decreased on the nipple, the areola, and the inferior breast skin (p = 0.01, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively) in group II but not in group I.In conclusion, ptotic or moderately hypertrophied breasts that were reduced using Lejour's technique recovered their preoperative level of sensitivity after an initial postoperative decline. However, in large breasts, although pressure sensitivity recovered after 1 year, temperature and vibration sensitivity remained diminished on the nipple-areola complex.     

Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap

The extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap can provide autogenous tissue replacement of breast volume without an implant. Nevertheless, experience with the extended latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction is relatively limited. In this study, the authors evaluated their experience with the extended latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction to better understand its indications, limitations, complications, and clinical outcomes. All patients who underwent breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi flaps at the authors' institution between January of 1990 and December of 2000 were reviewed. During the study period, 75 extended latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstructions were performed in 67 patients. Bilateral breast reconstructions were performed in eight patients, and 59 patients underwent unilateral breast reconstruction. There were 45 immediate and 30 delayed reconstructions. Mean patient age was 51.5 years. Mean body mass index was 31.8 kg/m2. Flap complications developed in 21 of 75 flaps (28.0 percent), and donor-site complications developed in 29 of 75 donor sites (38.7 percent). Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (17.3 percent) and donor-site seroma (25.3 percent) were found to be the most common complications. There were no flap losses. Patients aged 65 years or older had higher odds of developing flap complications compared with those 45 years or younger (p = 0.03). Patients with size D reconstructed breasts had significantly higher odds of flap complications compared with those with size A or B reconstructed breasts (p = 0.05). Obesity (body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2) was associated with a 2.15-fold increase in the odds of developing donor-site complications compared with patients with a body mass index less than 30 kg/m2 (p = 0.01). No other studied factors had a significant relationship with flap or donor-site complications. In most patients, the extended latissimus dorsi flap alone, without an implant, can provide good to excellent autologous reconstruction of small to medium sized breasts. In selected patients, larger breasts may be reconstructed with the extended latissimus dorsi flap alone. This flap's main disadvantage is donor-site morbidity with prolonged drainage and risk of seroma. Patients who are obese are at higher risk of developing these donor-site complications. In conclusion, the extended latissimus dorsi flap is a reliable method for total autologous breast reconstruction in most patients and should be considered more often as a primary choice for breast reconstruction.     

Autologous fat graft in nipple reconstruction

Reconstruction of the nipple is the penultimate step in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. A number of reconstructive techniques have been described for nipple reconstruction including skin grafts, composite grafts, and various local flaps. The authors' preferred reconstructive technique is the local C-V or modified star flap. This flap produces an excellent reconstruction, but it is dependent on underlying subcutaneous fat to provide bulk to the reconstructed nipple. In most instances, the subcutaneous tissue is adequate. However, under certain circumstances, the subcutaneous fat may be insufficient to produce a nipple of adequate projection. Two cases of bilateral nipple reconstruction after soft-tissue expansion and implant placement and subsequent nipple reconstruction with local flaps provided inadequate nipple projection. These instances, as well as a retrospective review of reconstructed nipples after mound restoration using a variety of techniques, led the authors to conclude that a more predictable alternative to sustain nipple projection was necessary. The authors identified two broad categories of breast reconstruction patients in whom this new technique would be beneficial. In the first category of patients, breast mounds are reconstructed with tissue expansion and implant insertion, and in the second category, breast mounds are reconstructed by any technique in which the nipple reconstruction subsequently flattens. This article describes the indications, techniques, and experience in 13 patients treated over a 10-month period with fat grafting for nipple reconstruction.     

Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique

In reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique, the dermal-breast pedicle can be manipulated to form a central breast mound and enhance breast projection. When this technique is applied both to macromastia and breast asymmetry, excellent early results are reported. To study the effects of time on breast reduction, 22 patients were followed for an average of 4.7 years. Contour of the breast mound and projection are well preserved. However, evaluation of long-term results reveals a gradual increase in the inframammary fold to inferior areola distance. Since no increase in the midclavicle to nipple distance is observed, inferior migration of the breast parenchyma and superior displacement of the nipple-areola with respect to the breast mound occur after reduction mammaplasty with the inferior pedicle technique.     

Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience

Recent trends in breast reconstruction have transitioned toward the skin-sparing type of mastectomy and immediate reconstruction using autologous tissue. This study was designed to document trends in the management of patients with unilateral breast cancer and to determine how they influence management of the contralateral breast.All patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction at Emory University Hospitals from January of 1975 to December of 1999 were reviewed. The cohort was stratified by timing of reconstruction (immediate versus delayed), method of reconstruction, and mastectomy type (skin-sparing versus non-skin-sparing). The methods of reconstruction included implant, latissimus dorsi flap, and transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Contralateral procedures to achieve symmetry included augmentation, mastopexy, augmentation/mastopexy, and reduction. A total of 1394 patients were evaluated, including 689 delayed and 705 immediate reconstructions. Sixty-seven percent of delayed-reconstruction patients (462 of 689) had a symmetry procedure performed on the opposite breast, compared with 22 percent for the immediate-reconstruction patients (155 of 705) (p 相似文献   

Delay in unipedicled TRAM flap reconstruction of the breast: a review of 76 consecutive cases

Since its introduction in 1982, the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap has become the standard therapy in autogenous breast reconstruction. A lower rate of partial flap (fat) necrosis is associated with microvascular free-flap transfer compared with the conventional (unipedicled) TRAM flap because of its potentially improved blood supply. A TRAM flap delay before flap transfer has been advocated, especially in a high-risk patient population (obesity, history of cigarette smoking, radiation therapy, or abdominal scar). The authors reviewed a series of 76 consecutive delayed unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions during a 5-year period. Data were analyzed with respect to type of procedure and time of delay, overall outcome, general surgical complications, flap-related (specific) complications (partial or complete flap loss), and patient satisfaction. Seventy-six unilateral breast reconstructions using the unipedicled TRAM flap were performed between 1995 and 2000 in 76 patients (mean age, 47.4 years). Fifty-four flaps were performed as immediate reconstructions, and 22 as secondary procedures. Seventy-two flaps were based on the contralateral pedicle, and four flaps were based on an ipsilateral pedicle. In all cases, a flap delay consisted of ligature of both deep inferior epigastric arteries and veins, accessed from an inferior flap incision down to the fascia, with a mean of 13.9 days before the flap transfer. No acute flap take-back procedure had to be performed. There was no complete flap loss, and breast reconstruction was achieved in all cases. In five cases (6.6 percent), a partial (fat) flap necrosis occurred. Interestingly, the majority of these cases (four of five) were secondary breast reconstructions. In addition, of the five patients who had partial flap necrosis, four had a history of smoking, two received radiation therapy, three received chemotherapy, and three patients were obese (body mass index greater than or equal to 30) or overweight (body mass index greater than or equal to 25). In three cases, an early surgical complication (two wound infections at the flap interface and one at the donor site) occurred. One patient developed a deep vein thrombosis. Five patients developed secondary ventral hernias necessitating repair (6.6 percent). Forty-one patients underwent secondary nipple-areola reconstruction. In 19 patients of this group, a secondary procedure (e.g., scar revision, limited liposuction, and/or excision of contour deformities) was simultaneously performed. A survey of patient satisfaction was performed using a modified SF-36 questionnaire. Fifty-one patients participated (67 percent). The overall satisfaction was very high and 51 patients reported that they would recommend the procedure to others (100 percent). Multiple factors such as patient selection, surgical expertise, and preoperative and postoperative management contribute to the success of any type of autogenous breast reconstruction. However, rare partial and absent complete flap necrosis in the authors' series may be attributable to the flap delay. A low morbidity rate and short hospital stay may become increasingly relevant, with limited structural and financial resources in the future. Therefore, the delayed unipedicled TRAM flap should be regarded as a valuable option in attempted breast reconstruction using autogenous tissue in both a high-risk and the general patient population.