An analysis of univalent segregation in meiotic mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana: a possible role for synaptonemal complex

During first meiotic prophase, homologous chromosomes are normally kept together by both crossovers and synaptonemal complexes (SC). In most eukaryotes, the SC disassembles at diplotene, leaving chromosomes joined by chiasmata. The correct co-orientation of bivalents at metaphase I and the reductional segregation at anaphase I are facilitated by chiasmata and sister-chromatid cohesion. In the absence of meiotic reciprocal recombination, homologs are expected to segregate randomly at anaphase I. Here, we have analyzed the segregation of homologous chromosomes at anaphase I in four meiotic mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana, spo11-1-3, dsy1, mpa1, and asy1, which show a high frequency of univalents at diplotene. The segregation pattern of chromosomes 2, 4, and 5 was different in each mutant. Homologous univalents segregated randomly in spo11-1-3, whereas they did not in dsy1 and mpa1. An intermediate situation was observed in asy1. Also, we have found a parallelism between this behavior and the synaptic pattern displayed by each mutant. Thus, whereas spo11-1-3 and asy1 showed low amounts of SC stretches, dsy1 and mpa1 showed full synapsis. These findings suggest that in Arabidopsis there is a system, depending on the SC formation, that would facilitate regular disjunction of homologous univalents to opposite poles at anaphase I.     

Meiotic association and segregation of the achiasmatic giant sex chromosomes in the male field vole (Microtus agrestis)

Controversy exists regarding the meiotic behaviour of the giant sex chromosomes during spermatogenesis in the field vole, Microtus agrestis. Both univalents and bivalents have been observed between diakinesis and metaphase I. These differences seem to be dependent on the technique used. The present study employs electron microscopy of serially sectioned testes tubules and light microscopy of microspread preparations to re-examine the behaviour of sex chromosomes during meiosis. In microspreads, about one-third of the early pachytene nuclei examined showed end joining of the X and Y axes. The longitudinal heterogeneity of the chromosomes in the form of axial thickenings allowed the detection of two different end-joining patterns. In the remaining early pachytene cells as well as in all mid to late pachytene cells seen, the X and Y axes had, though near to each other, no contact in the form of a synaptonemal complex. If a synaptonemal complex is a prerequisite for genetic exchange, the sex chromosomes in M. agrestis males must be achiasmatic. The analysis of serial sections through an early pachytene and a late prophase I nucleus with the electron microscope revealed that the sex chromosomes occupied a common area. By metaphase I, the centromeres of the X and Y were oriented towards opposite spindle poles while the chromosomes remained attached to one another by their distal segments at the level of the metaphase I plate. As a consequence of the large size of the sex chromosomes their centromeres lay close to the spindle poles. In anaphase I the sex chromosomes maintained their metaphase position until the autosomes approached the spindle poles. During autosomal migration a medial constriction developed where the sex chromosomes were mutually associated, the X and Y became separated, and joined the autosomes. In metaphase II the chromatids of the sex chromosomes lay side by side and exhibited a delayed separation in the subsequent anaphase. It is suggested that heterochromatin, which represents a major part of both sex chromosomes, plays a role in the association of the two achiasmatic sex chromosomes in metaphase I and in the delayed separation of the chromatids of the sex chromosomes in anaphase II.Dedicated to Prof. C.-G. Arnold (Erlangen) on the occasion of his 60th birthday     

Meiotic sister chromatid cohesion in holocentric sex chromosomes of three heteropteran species is maintained in absence of axial elements

It has been suggested that in species with monocentric chromosomes axial element (AE) components may be responsible for sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis. To test this hypothesis in species with holocentric chromosomes we selected three heteropteran species with different sex-determining mechanisms. We observed in surface-spreads and sections using transmission electron microscopy that the univalent sex chromosomes form neither AEs nor synaptonemal complexes (SCs) during pachytene. We also found that a polyclonal antibody recognizing SCP3/Cor1, a protein present at AEs and SC lateral elements of rodents, labels the autosomal SCs but not AEs or SC stretches corresponding to the sex chromosomes. Cytological analysis of the segregational behaviour of the sex univalents demonstrates that although these chromosomes segregate equationally during anaphase I they never show precocious separation of sister chromatids during late prophase I or metaphase I. These results suggest that AEs are not responsible for sister cohesion in sex chromosomes. The segregational behaviour of these chromosomes during both meiotic divisions also indicates that different achiasmate modes of chromosome association exist in heteropteran species. Received: 22 September 1999; in revised form: 20 December 1999 / Accepted: 21 December 1999     

Stage-specific damage to synaptonemal complexes and metaphase chromosomes induced by X rays in male mouse germ cells

Synaptonemal complexes reveal mutagen-induced effects in germ cell meiotic chromosomes. This study was aimed at characterizing relationships between damage to synaptonemal complexes and metaphase I chromosomes following radiation exposure at various stages of spermatogenesis. Male mice were irradiated with doses of 0, 2, or 4 Gy, and spermatocytes were harvested at times consistent with earlier exposures as spermatogonial stem cells, preleptotene cells (premeiotic DNA synthesis), or meiotic prophase cells. After stem-cell exposure, twice as many rearrangements were observed in synaptonemal complexes as in metaphase I chromosomes. Irradiation during premeiotic DNA synthesis resulted in dose-related increases in synaptonemal complex breakage and rearrangements (including novel forms) and in metaphase chromosomal aberrations. Following prophase exposure, various types and levels of damage to synaptonemal complexes and metaphase chromosomes were observed. Irradiation of zygotene cells led to high frequencies of chromosome multivalents in metaphase I without a correspondingly high level of damage in preceding prophase synaptonemal complexes. Thus irradiation of premeiotic and meiotic cells results in variable relationships between damage to synaptonemal complexes and metaphase chromosomes. Interpretations of these relationships are based upon what is known about both radiation clastogenesis and the structural/temporal relationships between synaptonemal complexes at prophase and chromosomes at metaphase I of meiosis.     

The meiotic behaviour of the XY pair in Lutreolina crassicaudata (Marsupialia: Didelphoidea)

The meiotic behaviour of the XY pair of the didelphid Lutreolina crassicaudata is analyzed by microspreading of spermatocytes for visualization of chromosomal axes and by three-dimensional reconstruction of spermatocyte nuclei from EM thin sections. The delay in pairing of sex chromosomes compared to autosomes and the absence of a synaptonemal complex between the axes of the X and Y chromosomes, already described for South American marsupials by three-dimensional reconstruction and for Australian species with synaptonemal complex microspreadings, is confirmed for this species. Sections demonstrate that at the diffuse stage and diplotene the dense plate occupies the region of the inner face of the nuclear envelope in contact with the XY body. Spreads show an structure similar in staining to the axes that becomes apparent simultaneously with the dense plate, called a balloon. The mechanism of XY pairing during meiotic prophase appears to be common to American and Australian marsupials as the same morphological pattern is found in all the species described. This mechanism is different from the way of pairing and segregation known for eutherian sex chromosomes.     

Differential immunolocalization of a putative Rec8p in meiotic autosomes and sex chromosomes of triatomine bugs

Hemipteran chromosomes are holocentric and show regular, special behavior at meiosis. While the autosomes pair at pachytene, have synaptonemal complexes (SCs) and recombination nodules (RNs) and segregate at anaphase I, the sex chromosomes do not form an SC or RNs, divide equationally at anaphase I, and their chromatids segregate at anaphase II. Here we show that this behavior is shared by the X and Y chromosomes of Triatoma infestans and the X(1)X(2)Y chromosomes of Triatoma pallidipennis. As Rec8p is a widely occurring component of meiotic cohesin, involved in meiotic homolog segregation, we used an antibody against Rec8p of Caenorhabditis elegans for immunolocalization in these triatomines. We show that while Rec8p is colocalized with SCs in the autosomes, no Rec8p can be found by immunolabeling in the sex chromosomes at any stage of meiosis. Furthermore, Rec8p labeling is lost from autosomal bivalents prior to metaphase I. In both triatomine species the sex chromosomes conjoin with each other during prophase I, and lack any SC, but they form "fuzzy cores", which are observed with silver staining and with light and electron microscopy during pachytene. Thin, serial sectioning and electron microscopy of spermatocytes at metaphases I and II reveals differential behavior of the sex chromosomes. At metaphase I the sex chromosomes form separate entities, each surrounded by a membranous sheath. On the other hand, at metaphase II the sex chromatids are closely tied and surrounded by a shared membranous sheath. The peculiar features of meiosis in these hemipterans suggest that they depart from the standard meiotic mechanisms proposed for other organisms.     

Inverted meiosis and its place in the evolution of sexual reproduction pathways

Inverted meiosis is observed in plants (Cyperaceae and Juncaceae) and insects (Coccoidea, Aphididae) with holocentric chromosomes, the centromeres of which occupy from 70 to 90% of the metaphase chromosome length. In the first meiotic division (meiosis I), chiasmata are formed and rodlike bivalents orient equationally, and in anaphase I, sister chromatids segregate to the poles; the diploid chromosome number is maintained. Non-sister chromatids of homologous chromosomes remain in contact during interkinesis and prophase II and segregate in anaphase II, forming haploid chromosome sets. The segregation of sister chromatids in meiosis I was demonstrated by example of three plant species that were heterozygous for chromosomal rearrangements. In these species, sister chromatids, marked with rearrangement, segregated in anaphase I. Using fluorescent antibodies, it was demonstrated that meiotic recombination enzymes Spo11 and Rad5l, typical of canonical meiosis, functioned at the meiotic prophase I of pollen mother cells of Luzula elegance and Rhynchospora pubera. Moreover, antibodies to synaptonemal complexes proteins ASY1 and ZYP1 were visualized as filamentous structures, pointing to probable formation of synaptonemal complexes. In L. elegance, chiasmata are formed by means of chromatin threads containing satellite DNA. According to the hypothesis of the author of this review, equational division of sister chromatids at meiosis I in the organisms with inverted meiosis can be explained by the absence of specific meiotic proteins (shugoshins). These proteins are able to protect cohesins of holocentric centromeres from hydrolysis by separases at meiosis I, as occurs in the organisms with monocentric chromosomes and canonical meiosis. The basic type of inverted meiosis was described in Coccoidea and Aphididae males. In their females, the variants of parthenogenesis were also observed. Until now, the methods of molecular cytogenetics were not applied for the analysis of inverted meiosis in Coccoidea and Aphididae. Evolutionary, inverted meiosis is thought to have appeared secondarily as an adaptation of the molecular mechanisms of canonical meiosis to chromosome holocentrism.     

Sgo1 is required for co-segregation of sister chromatids during achiasmate meiosis I

The reduction of chromosome number during meiosis is achieved by two successive rounds of chromosome segregation, called meiosis I and meiosis II. While meiosis II is similar to mitosis in that sister kinetochores are bi-oriented and segregate to opposite poles, recombined homologous chromosomes segregate during the first meiotic division. Formation of chiasmata, mono-orientation of sister kinetochores and protection of centromeric cohesion are three major features of meiosis I chromosomes which ensure the reductional nature of chromosome segregation. Here we show that sister chromatids frequently segregate to opposite poles during meiosis I in fission yeast cells that lack both chiasmata and the protector of centromeric cohesion Sgo1. Our data are consistent with the notion that sister kinetochores are frequently bi-oriented in the absence of chiasmata and that Sgo1 prevents equational segregation of sister chromatids during achiasmate meiosis I.     

Sgo1 is required for co-segregation of sister chromatids during achiasmate meiosis I

The reduction of chromosome number during meiosis is achieved by two successive rounds of chromosome segregation, called meiosis I and meiosis II. While meiosis II is similar to mitosis in that sister kinetochores are bi-oriented and segregate to opposite poles, recombined homologous chromosomes segregate during the first meiotic division. Formation of chiasmata, mono-orientation of sister kinetochores and protection of centromeric cohesion are three major features of meiosis I chromosomes which ensure the reductional nature of chromosome segregation. Here we show that sister chromatids frequently segregate to opposite poles during meiosis I in fission yeast cells that lack both chiasmata and the protector of centromeric cohesion Sgo1. Our data are consistent with the notion that sister kinetochores are frequently bi-oriented in the absence of chiasmata and that Sgo1 prevents equational segregation of sister chromatids during achiasmate meiosis I.Key words: meiosis, chromosome segregation, recombination, kinetochore, Sgo1, fission yeast     

Meiotic pairing and segregation of achiasmate sex chromosomes in eutherian mammals: the role of SYCP3 protein

In most eutherian mammals, sex chromosomes synapse and recombine during male meiosis in a small region called pseudoautosomal region. However in some species sex chromosomes do not synapse, and how these chromosomes manage to ensure their proper segregation is under discussion. Here we present a study of the meiotic structure and behavior of sex chromosomes in one of these species, the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). We have analyzed the location of synaptonemal complex (SC) proteins SYCP1 and SYCP3, as well as three proteins involved in the process of meiotic recombination (RAD51, MLH1, and γ-H2AX). Our results show that although X and Y chromosomes are associated at pachytene and form a sex body, their axial elements (AEs) do not contact, and they never assemble a SC central element. Furthermore, MLH1 is not detected on the AEs of the sex chromosomes, indicating the absence of reciprocal recombination. At diplotene the organization of sex chromosomes changes strikingly, their AEs associate end to end, and SYCP3 forms an intricate network that occupies the Y chromosome and the distal region of the X chromosome long arm. Both the association of sex chromosomes and the SYCP3 structure are maintained until metaphase I. In anaphase I sex chromosomes migrate to opposite poles, but SYCP3 filaments connecting both chromosomes are observed. Hence, one can assume that SYCP3 modifications detected from diplotene onwards are correlated with the maintenance of sex chromosome association. These results demonstrate that some components of the SC may participate in the segregation of achiasmate sex chromosomes in eutherian mammals.     

The mechanism of secondary nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster females

Bridges (1916) observed that X chromosome nondisjunction was much more frequent in XXY females than it was in genetically normal XX females. In addition, virtually all cases of X nondisjunction in XXY females were due to XX <--> Y segregational events in oocytes in which the two X chromosomes had failed to undergo crossing over. He referred to these XX <--> Y segregation events as "secondary nondisjunction." Cooper (1948) proposed that secondary nondisjunction results from the formation of an X-Y-X trivalent, such that the Y chromosome directs the segregation of two achiasmate X chromosomes to opposite poles on the first meiotic spindle. Using in situ hybridization to X and YL chromosomal satellite sequences, we demonstrate that XX <--> Y segregations are indeed presaged by physical associations of the X and Y chromosomal heterochromatin. The physical colocalization of the three sex chromosomes is observed in virtually all oocytes in early prophase and maintained at high frequency until midprophase in all genotypes examined. Although these XXY associations are usually dissolved by late prophase in oocytes that undergo X chromosomal crossing over, they are maintained throughout prophase in oocytes with nonexchange X chromosomes. The persistence of such XXY associations in the absence of exchange presumably facilitates the segregation of the two X chromosomes and the Y chromosome to opposite poles on the developing meiotic spindle. Moreover, the observation that XXY pairings are dissolved at the end of pachytene in oocytes that do undergo X chromosomal crossing over demonstrates that exchanges can alter heterochromatic (and thus presumably centromeric) associations during meiotic prophase.     

The murine SCP3 gene is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, chromosome synapsis, and male fertility

During meiosis, the homologous chromosomes pair and recombine. An evolutionarily conserved protein structure, the synaptonemal complex (SC), is located along the paired meiotic chromosomes. We have studied the function of a structural component in the axial/lateral element of the SC, the synaptonemal complex protein 3 (SCP3). A null mutation in the SCP3 gene was generated, and we noted that homozygous mutant males were sterile due to massive apoptotic cell death during meiotic prophase. The SCP3-deficient male mice failed to form axial/lateral elements and SCs, and the chromosomes in the mutant spermatocytes did not synapse. While the absence of SCP3 affected the nuclear distribution of DNA repair and recombination proteins (Rad51 and RPA), as well as synaptonemal complex protein 1 (SCP1), a residual chromatin organization remained in the mutant meiotic cells.     

The fate of multivalents during meiotic prophase in the hybrid Gibasis consobrina x G. karwinskyana Rafin. (Commelinaceae)

The chromosomes of the two closely related diploid species, Gibasis consobrina and G. karwinskyana (Commelinaceae; 2n=2x=10), are morphologically alike, yet form few chiasmate associations at metaphase I in the f₁ hybrid. During meiotic prophase, however, synaptonemal complexes join the majority of the chromosomes of the complement in complex multiple pairing configurations. The F₁ hybrid between different tetraploid genotypes of the same two species similarly forms multivalents during meiotic prophase, which are subsequently eliminated in favour of strictly homologous bivalents before metaphase I. One quadrivalent comprising interchange chromosomes inherited from one of the parents, usually persists to first metaphase. Evidently the resolution of multivalents to bivalents at first metaphase, which accounts for diploidisation, is not attributable to the elimination of multivalents per se, but of multivalents comprising chromosomes of limited homology.     

First evidence of sex chromosome pre-reduction in male meiosis in the Miridae bugs (Heteroptera)

The karyotype and male meiosis of Macrolophus costalis Fieber (Insecta, Heteroptera, Miridae) were studied using C-banding, AgNOR-banding and DNA sequence specific fluorochrome staining. The chromosome formula of the species is 2n = 28(24+X1X2X3Y). Male meiotic prophase is characterized by a prominent condensation stage. At this stage, two sex chromosomes, "X" and Y are positively heteropycnotic and always appeared together, while in autosomal bivalents homologous chromosomes were aligned side by side along their entire length, that is, meiosis is achiasmatic. At metaphase I, "X" and Y form a pseudobivalent and orient to the opposite poles. At early anaphase I, the "X" chromosome disintegrates into three separate small chromosomes, X1, X2, and X3. Hence both the autosomes and sex chromosomes segregate reductionally in the first anaphase, and separate equationally in the second anaphase. This is the first evidence of sex chromosome pre-reduction in the family Miridae. Data on C-heterochromatin distribution and its composition in the chromosomes of this species are discussed.     

Meiotic chromosome interactions in inbred autotetraploid rye (Secale cereale).

Electron microscopy of whole-mount surface-spread synaptonemal complex complements and conventional light microscopy of chromosomes at first metaphase of meiosis were used to compare the relative frequencies of pairing configurations at the two stages in inbred autotetraploid rye (Secale cereale L.). Statistical tests showed significantly fewer multivalents at first metaphase than expectations based on random initiation of synapsis at each telomeric site within each group of four homologues. Direct observations of synaptic behaviour of chromosomes showed that this deviation is due primarily to a preponderance of bivalents during zygotene and pachytene. It is also the result of a significant drop in multivalent frequency from meiotic prophase to metaphase I, which is attributable both to a lack of chiasmata with which to consolidate multivalents and inhibition of chiasma formation in synaptonemal complex segments of multivalents that are nonhomologous.     

Sisters Unbound Is Required for Meiotic Centromeric Cohesion in Drosophila melanogaster

Regular meiotic chromosome segregation requires sister centromeres to mono-orient (orient to the same pole) during the first meiotic division (meiosis I) when homologous chromosomes segregate, and to bi-orient (orient to opposite poles) during the second meiotic division (meiosis II) when sister chromatids segregate. Both orientation patterns require cohesion between sister centromeres, which is established during meiotic DNA replication and persists until anaphase of meiosis II. Meiotic cohesion is mediated by a conserved four-protein complex called cohesin that includes two structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) subunits (SMC1 and SMC3) and two non-SMC subunits. In Drosophila melanogaster, however, the meiotic cohesion apparatus has not been fully characterized and the non-SMC subunits have not been identified. We have identified a novel Drosophila gene called sisters unbound (sunn), which is required for stable sister chromatid cohesion throughout meiosis. sunn mutations disrupt centromere cohesion during prophase I and cause high frequencies of non-disjunction (NDJ) at both meiotic divisions in both sexes. SUNN co-localizes at centromeres with the cohesion proteins SMC1 and SOLO in both sexes and is necessary for the recruitment of both proteins to centromeres. Although SUNN lacks sequence homology to cohesins, bioinformatic analysis indicates that SUNN may be a structural homolog of the non-SMC cohesin subunit stromalin (SA), suggesting that SUNN may serve as a meiosis-specific cohesin subunit. In conclusion, our data show that SUNN is an essential meiosis-specific Drosophila cohesion protein.     

Meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila females: behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in the nod kinesin-like protein

Mature Drosophila oocytes are arrested in metaphase of the first meiotic division. We have examined microtubule and chromatin reorganization as the meiosis I spindle assembles on maturation using indirect immunofluorescence and laser scanning confocal microscopy. The results suggest that chromatin captures or nucleates microtubules, and that these subsequently form a highly tapered spindle in which the majority of microtubules do not terminate at the poles. Nonexchange homologs separate from each other and move toward opposite poles during spindle assembly. By the time of metaphase arrest, these chromosomes are positioned on opposite half spindles, between the metaphase plate and the spindle poles, with the large nonexchange X chromosomes always closer to the metaphase plate than the smaller nonexchange fourth chromosomes. Nonexchange homologs are therefore oriented on the spindle in the absence of a direct physical linkage, and the spindle position of these chromosomes appears to be determined by size. Loss-of-function mutations at the nod locus, which encodes a kinesin-like protein, cause meiotic loss and nondisjunction of nonexchange chromosomes, but have little or no effect on exchange chromosome segregation. In oocytes lacking functional nod protein, most of the nonexchange chromosomes are ejected from the main chromosomal mass shortly after the nuclear envelope breaks down and microtubules interact with the chromatin. In addition, the nonexchange chromosomes that are associated with spindles in nod/nod oocytes show excessive poleward migration. Based on these observations, and the structural similarity of the nod protein and kinesin, we propose that nonexchange chromosomes are maintained on the half spindle by opposing poleward and anti-poleward forces, and that the nod protein provides the anti-poleward force.     

Mitotic and meiotic chromosomes in Somatochlora metallica (Cordulidae,Odonata). The absence of localized centromeres and inverted meiosis

Spermatogonial metaphase chromosomes were examined in two dragonfly species, Somatochlora metallica (Cordulidae) and Aeshna grandis (Aeshnidae), and the behaviour of male meiotic chromosomes was studied in S. metallica. Both in S. metallica and A. grandis the male mitotic metaphase chromosomes from cells treated with colchicine consisted of two equidistantly aligned chromatids, showing no primary constriction. In meiosis the chromosomes of S. metallica males showed telokinetic activity during the first meiotic division, and kinetic activity was restricted in the middle parts of chromosomes during the second division. The kinetic behaviour of the chromosomes both in mitosis and meiosis showed that they were holocentric. One chiasma arises interstitially in each bivalent in S. metallica male meiosis. The chiasmata retain their interstitial position at metaphase I and do not terminalize. At metaphase I bivalents co-orient with homologous telomere regions towards the opposite poles. Thus genuine dyads segregate at the first anaphase. Meiosis in these male dragonflies is thus pre-reductional or conventional, not post-reductional or inverted, as has been previously proposed.     

Synaptonemal complex components persist at centromeres and are required for homologous centromere pairing in mouse spermatocytes

Recent studies in simple model organisms have shown that centromere pairing is important for ensuring high-fidelity meiotic chromosome segregation. However, this process and the mechanisms regulating it in higher eukaryotes are unknown. Here we present the first detailed study of meiotic centromere pairing in mouse spermatogenesis and link it with key events of the G2/metaphase I transition. In mouse we observed no evidence of the persistent coupling of centromeres that has been observed in several model organisms. We do however find that telomeres associate in non-homologous pairs or small groups in B type spermatogonia and pre-leptotene spermatocytes, and this association is disrupted by deletion of the synaptonemal complex component SYCP3. Intriguingly, we found that, in mid prophase, chromosome synapsis is not initiated at centromeres, and centromeric regions are the last to pair in the zygotene-pachytene transition. In late prophase, we first identified the proteins that reside at paired centromeres. We found that components of the central and lateral element and transverse filaments of the synaptonemal complex are retained at paired centromeres after disassembly of the synaptonemal complex along diplotene chromosome arms. The absence of SYCP1 prevents centromere pairing in knockout mouse spermatocytes. The localization dynamics of SYCP1 and SYCP3 suggest that they play different roles in promoting homologous centromere pairing. SYCP1 remains only at paired centromeres coincident with the time at which some kinetochore proteins begin loading at centromeres, consistent with a role in assembly of meiosis-specific kinetochores. After removal of SYCP1 from centromeres, SYCP3 then accumulates at paired centromeres where it may promote bi-orientation of homologous centromeres. We propose that, in addition to their roles as synaptonemal complex components, SYCP1 and SYCP3 act at the centromeres to promote the establishment and/or maintenance of centromere pairing and, by doing so, improve the segregation fidelity of mammalian meiotic chromosomes.     

Meiotic cohesin REC8 marks the axial elements of rat synaptonemal complexes before cohesins SMC1beta and SMC3

In meiotic prophase, the sister chromatids of each chromosome develop a common axial element (AE) that is integrated into the synaptonemal complex (SC). We analyzed the incorporation of sister chromatid cohesion proteins (cohesins) and other AE components into AEs. Meiotic cohesin REC8 appeared shortly before premeiotic S phase in the nucleus and formed AE-like structures (REC8-AEs) from premeiotic S phase on. Subsequently, meiotic cohesin SMC1beta, cohesin SMC3, and AE proteins SCP2 and SCP3 formed dots along REC8-AEs, which extended and fused until they lined REC8-AEs along their length. In metaphase I, SMC1beta, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3 disappeared from the chromosome arms and accumulated around the centromeres, where they stayed until anaphase II. In striking contrast, REC8 persisted along the chromosome arms until anaphase I and near the centromeres until anaphase II. We propose that REC8 provides a basis for AE formation and that the first steps in AE assembly do not require SMC1beta, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3. Furthermore, SMC1beta, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3 cannot provide arm cohesion during metaphase I. We propose that REC8 then provides cohesion. RAD51 and/or DMC1 coimmunoprecipitates with REC8, suggesting that REC8 may also provide a basis for assembly of recombination complexes.