AP endonuclease 1 coordinates flap endonuclease 1 and DNA ligase I activity in long patch base excision repair

Base loss is common in cellular DNA, resulting from spontaneous degradation and enzymatic removal of damaged bases. Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases recognize and cleave abasic (AP) sites during base excision repair (BER). APE1 (REF1, HAP1) is the predominant AP endonuclease in mammalian cells. Here we analyzed the influences of APE1 on the human BER pathway. Specifically, APE1 enhanced the enzymatic activity of both flap endonuclease1 (FEN1) and DNA ligase I. FEN1 was stimulated on all tested substrates, regardless of flap length. Interestingly, we have found that APE1 can also inhibit the activities of both enzymes on substrates with a tetrahydrofuran (THF) residue on the 5'-downstream primer of a nick, simulating a reduced abasic site. However once the THF residue was displaced at least a single nucleotide, stimulation of FEN1 activity by APE1 resumes. Stimulation of DNA ligase I required the traditional nicked substrate. Furthermore, APE1 was able to enhance overall product formation in reconstitution of BER steps involving FEN1 cleavage followed by ligation. Overall, APE1 both stimulated downstream components of BER and prevented a futile cleavage and ligation cycle, indicating a far-reaching role in BER.     

Use of Modified Flap Structures for Study of Base Excision Repair Proteins

To investigate interactions between proteins participating in the long-patch pathway of base excision repair (BER), DNA duplexes with flap strand containing modifications in sugar phosphate backbone within the flap-forming oligonucleotides were designed. When the flap-forming oligonucleotide consisted of two sequences bridged by a decanediol linker located in the flap strand near the branch point, the efficiency and position of cleavage by flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) differed from those for natural flap. The cleavage rate of chimeric structure by FEN1 was lower than that of a normal substrate. When we introduced the second modification in the flap-forming oligonucleotide, the cleavage rate decreased significantly. To estimate efficiency of recognition and processing of the chimeric structures by BER proteins, we studied the rate of DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta) and the rate of nucleotide excision at the 3'-end of the initiating primer by apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) compared with those for the natural DNA duplexes. Efficiency of strand-displacement DNA synthesis catalyzed by Pol beta was shown to be higher for flap structures containing non-nucleotide linkers. The chimeric structures were processed by the 3'-exonuclease activity of APE1 with efficiency lower than that for a normal flap structure. Thus, DNA duplexes with modifications in sugar phosphate backbone can be used to mimic intermediates of the long-patch pathway of BER in reconstituted systems containing FEN1. Based on chimeric and natural oligonucleotides, photoreactive DNA structures were designed. The photoreactive dCMP moiety was introduced into the 3'-end of DNA primer via the activity of Pol beta. The photoreactive DNA duplexes--3'-recessed DNA, nicked DNA, and flap structures containing natural and chimeric oligonucleotides--were used for photoaffinity labeling of BER proteins.     

DNA polymerase beta and flap endonuclease 1 enzymatic specificities sustain DNA synthesis for long patch base excision repair

DNA polymerase beta (pol beta) and flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) are key players in pol beta-mediated long-patch base excision repair (LP-BER). It was proposed that this type of LP-BER is accomplished through FEN1 removal of a 2- to 11-nucleotide flap created by pol beta strand displacement DNA synthesis. To understand how these enzymes might cooperate during LP-BER, we characterized purified human pol beta DNA synthesis by utilizing various BER intermediates, including single-nucleotide-gapped DNA, nicked DNA, and nicked DNA with various lengths of flaps all with a 5'-terminal tetrahydrofuran (THF) residue. We observed that nicked DNA and nicked-THF flap DNA were poor substrates for pol beta-mediated DNA synthesis; yet, DNA synthesis was strongly stimulated by purified human FEN1. FEN1 did not improve pol beta substrate binding. FEN1 cleavage activity was required for the stimulation, suggesting that FEN1 removed a barrier to pol beta DNA synthesis. In addition, FEN1 cleavage on both nicked and nicked-THF flap DNA resulted in a one-nucleotide gapped DNA molecule that was an ideal substrate for pol beta. This study demonstrates that pol beta cooperates with FEN1 to remove DNA damage via a "Hit and Run" mechanism, involving alternating short gap production by FEN1 and gap filling by pol beta, rather than through coordinated formation and removal of a strand-displaced flap.     

Regulatory roles of p21 and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 in base excision repair

Many types of DNA damage induce a cellular response that inhibits replication but allows repair by up-regulating the p53 pathway and inducing p21(Cip1, Waf1, Sdi1). The p21 regulatory protein can bind proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and prohibit DNA replication. We show here that p21 also inhibits PCNA stimulation of long patch base excision repair (BER) in vitro. p21 disrupts PCNA-directed stimulation of flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1), DNA ligase I, and DNA polymerase delta. The dilemma is to understand how p21 prevents DNA replication but allows BER in vivo. Differential regulation by p21 is likely to relate to the utilization of DNA polymerase beta, which is not sensitive to p21, in the repair pathway. We have also found that apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) stimulates long patch BER. Furthermore, neither APE1 activity nor its ability to stimulate long patch BER is significantly affected by p21 in vitro. We propose that APE1 serves as an assembly and coordination factor for long patch BER proteins. APE1 initially cleaves the DNA and then facilitates the sequential binding and catalysis by DNA polymerase beta, DNA polymerase delta, FEN1, and DNA ligase I. This model implies that BER can be regulated differentially, based upon the assembly of relevant proteins around APE1 in the presence or absence of PCNA.     

Mitochondrial base excision repair of uracil and AP sites takes place by single-nucleotide insertion and long-patch DNA synthesis

Base excision repair (BER) corrects a variety of small base lesions in DNA. The UNG gene encodes both the nuclear (UNG2) and the mitochondrial (UNG1) forms of the human uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG). We prepared mitochondrial extracts free of nuclear BER proteins from human cell lines. Using these extracts we show that UNG is the only detectable UDG in mitochondria, and mitochondrial BER (mtBER) of uracil and AP sites occur by both single-nucleotide insertion and long-patch repair DNA synthesis. Importantly, extracts of mitochondria carry out repair of modified AP sites which in nuclei occurs through long-patch BER. Such lesions may be rather prevalent in mitochondrial DNA because of its proximity to the electron transport chain, the primary site of production of reactive oxygen species. Furthermore, mitochondrial extracts remove 5' protruding flaps from DNA which can be formed during long-patch BER, by a "flap endonuclease like" activity, although flap endonuclease (FEN1) is not present in mitochondria. In conclusion, combined short- and long-patch BER activities enable mitochondria to repair a broader range of lesions in mtDNA than previously known.     

Study of interaction of XRCC1 with DNA and proteins of base excision repair by photoaffinity labeling technique

The X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) protein plays a central role in base excision repair (BER) interacting with and modulating activity of key BER proteins. To estimate the influence of XRCC1 on interactions of BER proteins poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1), flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1), and DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta) with DNA intermediates, photoaffinity labeling using different photoreactive DNA was carried out in the presence or absence of XRCC1. XRCC1 competes with APE1, FEN1, and PARP1 for DNA binding, while Pol beta increases the efficiency of XRCC1 modification. To study the interactions of XRCC1 with DNA and proteins at the initial stages of BER, DNA duplexes containing a photoreactive group in the template strand opposite the damage were designed. DNA duplexes with 8-oxoguanine or dihydrothymine opposite the photoreactive group were recognized and cleaved by specific DNA glycosylases (OGG1 or NTH1, correspondingly), although the rate of oxidized base excision in the photoreactive structures was lower than in normal substrates. XRCC1 does not display any specificity in recognition of DNA duplexes with damaged bases compared to regular DNA. A photoreactive group opposite a synthetic apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site (3-hydroxy-2-hydroxymethyltetrahydrofuran) weakly influences the incision efficiency of AP site analog by APE1. In the absence of magnesium ions, i.e. when incision of AP sites cannot occur, APE1 and XRCC1 compete for DNA binding when present together. However, in the presence of magnesium ions the level of XRCC1 modification increased upon APE1 addition, since APE1 creates nicked DNA duplex, which interacts with XRCC1 more efficiently.     

FEN1 stimulation of DNA polymerase beta mediates an excision step in mammalian long patch base excision repair

In mammalian cells, single-base lesions, such as uracil and abasic sites, appear to be repaired by at least two base excision repair (BER) subpathways: "single-nucleotide BER" requiring DNA synthesis of just one nucleotide and "long patch BER" requiring multi-nucleotide DNA synthesis. In single-nucleotide BER, DNA polymerase beta (beta-pol) accounts for both gap filling DNA synthesis and removal of the 5'-deoxyribose phosphate (dRP) of the abasic site, whereas the involvement of various DNA polymerases in long patch BER is less well understood. Recently, we found that beta-pol plays a role in mammalian cell extract-mediated long patch BER, in that formation of a key excision product, 5'-dRP-trinucleotide (5'-dRP-N(3)), is dependent upon beta-pol (Dianov, G. L., Prasad, R., Wilson, S. H., and Bohr, V.A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13741-13743). The structure-specific endonuclease flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) has also been suggested to be involved in long patch BER excision. Here, we demonstrate by immunodepletion experiments that 5'-dRP-N(3) excision in long patch BER of uracil-DNA in a human lymphoid cell extract is, indeed, dependent upon FEN1. Next, we reconstituted the excision step of long patch BER using purified human proteins and an oligonucleotide substrate with 5'-dRP at the margin of a one-nucleotide gap. Formation of the excision product 5'-dRP-N(3) was dependent upon both strand displacement DNA synthesis by beta-pol and FEN1 excision. FEN1 stimulated strand displacement DNA synthesis of beta-pol. FEN1 acting either alone, or without DNA synthesis by beta-pol, produced a two-nucleotide excision product, 5'-dRP-N(1), but not 5'-dRP-N(3). These results demonstrate that human FEN1 and beta-pol can cooperate in long patch BER excision and specify the predominant excision product seen with a cell extract.     

Multifunctional human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1: the role of additional functions

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease 1 (APE1) is multifunctional enzyme. APEI is involved in the DNA base excision repair process (BER). APE1 participates in BER by cleaving the DNA adjacent to the 5' side of an AP site to produce a hydroxyl group at the 3' terminus of an unmodified nucleotide upstream of the nick and a 5' deoxyribose phosphate moiety downstream. In addition to its AP-endonucleolytic function, APE1 possesses 3' phosphodiesterase, 3'-5' exonuclease and 3' phosphatase activities. Independently of being characterized as DNA repair protein, APE1 was identified as redox-factor (Ref-1). Our own and literature data on the role of APE1 additional functions in cell metabolism and on interactions of APE1 with DNA and other proteins that participate in BER are analyzed in this review.     

AP endonuclease 1 prevents trinucleotide repeat expansion via a novel mechanism during base excision repair

Base excision repair (BER) of an oxidized base within a trinucleotide repeat (TNR) tract can lead to TNR expansions that are associated with over 40 human neurodegenerative diseases. This occurs as a result of DNA secondary structures such as hairpins formed during repair. We have previously shown that BER in a TNR hairpin loop can lead to removal of the hairpin, attenuating or preventing TNR expansions. Here, we further provide the first evidence that AP endonuclease 1 (APE1) prevented TNR expansions via its 3′-5′ exonuclease activity and stimulatory effect on DNA ligation during BER in a hairpin loop. Coordinating with flap endonuclease 1, the APE1 3′-5′ exonuclease activity cleaves the annealed upstream 3′-flap of a double-flap intermediate resulting from 5′-incision of an abasic site in the hairpin loop. Furthermore, APE1 stimulated DNA ligase I to resolve a long double-flap intermediate, thereby promoting hairpin removal and preventing TNR expansions.     

The identification and optimization of 2,4-diketobutyric acids as flap endonuclease 1 inhibitors

There have been several recent reports of chemopotentiation via inhibition of DNA repair processes. Flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is a key enzyme involved in base excision repair (BER), a primary pathway utilized by mammalian cells to repair DNA damage. In this report, we describe the identification and SAR of a series of 2,4-diketobutyric acid FEN1 inhibitors.     

Human MUS81 complexes stimulate flap endonuclease 1

The yeast heterodimeric Mus81-Mms4 complex possesses a structure-specific endonuclease activity that is critical for the restart of stalled replication forks and removal of toxic recombination intermediates. Previously, we reported that Mus81-Mms4 and Rad27 (yeast FEN1, another structure-specific endonuclease) showed mutual stimulation of nuclease activity. In this study, we investigated the interactions between human FEN1 and MUS81-EME1 or MUS81-EME2, the human homologs of the yeast Mus81-Mms4 complex. We found that both MUS81-EME1 and MUS81-EME2 increased the activity of FEN1, but FEN1 did not stimulate the activity of MUS81-EME1/EME2. The MUS81 subunit alone and its N-terminal half were able to bind to FEN1 and stimulate its endonuclease activity. A truncated FEN1 fragment lacking the C-terminal region that retained catalytic activity was not stimulated by MUS81. Michaelis-Menten kinetic analysis revealed that MUS81 increased the interaction between FEN1 and its substrates, resulting in increased turnover. We also showed that, after DNA damage in human cells, FEN1 co-localizes with MUS81. These findings indicate that the human proteins and yeast homologs act similarly, except that the human FEN1 does not stimulate the nuclease activities of MUS81-EME1 or MUS81-EME2. Thus, the mammalian MUS81 complexes and FEN1 collaborate to remove the various flap structures that arise during many DNA transactions, including Okazaki fragment processing.     

Multifunctional human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1: Role of additional functions

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease 1 (APE1) is a multifunctional enzyme involved in base excision repair (BER). APE1 cleaves DNA 5′ of an AP site to produce a single-strand break with 5′-OH and 3′-deoxyribose phosphate. In addition to its AP-endonucleolytic function, APE1 possesses 3′-phosphodiesterase, 3′–5′ exonuclease, and 3′-phosphatase activities. Independently of its function as a repair protein, APE1 was identified as a redox factor (Ref-1). The review summarizes the published and original data on the role of the additional functions of APE1 in DNA repair and apoptosis and regulation of the BER system via APE1 interaction with DNA and other repair proteins.     

Influence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and its apoptotic 24-kD fragment on repair of DNA duplexes in bovine testis nuclear extract

Effects of exogenous proteins poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) and its 24-kD proteolytic fragment (p24) on the repair of DNA duplexes containing a one nucleotide gap with furan phosphate or phosphate group at the 5'-end of the downstream primer were studied in bovine testis nuclear extract. These damaged DNAs are repaired by the long-patch or short-patch subpathways of base excision repair (BER), respectively. Exogenous PARP1 and p24 decreased the efficiency of gap filling DNA synthesis for both duplexes, but did not influence the ligation stage in the repair of DNA duplex by the short-patch subpathway. Under the same conditions, these proteins inhibited strand-displacement DNA synthesis and decreased the efficiency of the flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1)-catalyzed endonuclease reaction in the nuclear extract, blocking repair of DNA duplex by the long-patch subpathway. Addition of exogenous PARP1 and p24 also reduced the efficiency of UV light crosslinking of extract BER proteins to the photoreactive BER intermediates carrying a nick. Thus, PARP1 and p24 interact with DNA intermediates of BER and compete with nuclear extract proteins for binding to DNA. The interaction of PARP1 and p24 with DNA intermediates of the long-patch subpathway of BER resulted in inhibition of subsequent stages of the repair mediated by this mechanism. However, on recovery of the intact structure of DNA duplex by the short-patch subpathway, PARP1 and p24 suppressed the repair of the one nucleotide gap less efficiently and failed to influence the final stage of the repair, ligation.     

Replication protein A stimulates proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent repair of abasic sites in DNA by human cell extracts.

Base excision repair (BER) pathway is the major cellular process for removal of endogenous base lesions and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites in DNA. There are two base excision repair subpathways in mammalian cells, characterized by the number of nucleotides synthesized into the excision patch. They are the "single-nucleotide" (one nucleotide incorporated) and the "long-patch" (several nucleotides incorporated) BER pathways. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is known to be an essential factor in long-patch base excision repair. We have studied the role of replication protein A (RPA) in PCNA-dependent, long-patch BER of AP sites in human cell extracts. PCNA and RPA were separated from the other BER proteins by fractionation of human whole-cell extract on a phosphocellulose column. The protein fraction PC-FII (phosphocellulose fraction II), which does not contain RPA and PCNA but otherwise contains all core BER proteins required for PCNA-dependent BER (AP endonuclease, DNA polymerases delta, beta and DNA ligase, and FEN1 endonuclease), had reduced ability to repair plasmid DNA containing AP sites. Purified PCNA or RPA, when added separately, could only partially restore the PC-FII repair activity of AP sites. However, additions of both proteins together greatly stimulated AP site repair by PC-FII. These results demonstrate a role for RPA in PCNA-dependent BER of AP sites.     

Activity of FEN1 endonuclease on nucleosome substrates is dependent upon DNA sequence but not flap orientation

We demonstrated previously that human FEN1 endonuclease, an enzyme involved in excising single-stranded DNA flaps that arise during Okazaki fragment processing and base excision repair, cleaves model flap substrates assembled into nucleosomes. Here we explore the effect of flap orientation with respect to the surface of the histone octamer on nucleosome structure and FEN1 activity in vitro. We find that orienting the flap substrate toward the histone octamer does not significantly alter the rotational orientation of two different nucleosome positioning sequences on the surface of the histone octamer but does cause minor perturbation of nucleosome structure. Surprisingly, flaps oriented toward the nucleosome surface are accessible to FEN1 cleavage in nucleosomes containing the Xenopus 5S positioning sequence. In contrast, neither flaps oriented toward nor away from the nucleosome surface are cleaved by the enzyme in nucleosomes containing the high-affinity 601 nucleosome positioning sequence. The data are consistent with a model in which sequence-dependent motility of DNA on the nucleosome is a major determinant of FEN1 activity. The implications of these findings for the activity of FEN1 in vivo are discussed.     

DNA tandem lesion repair by strand displacement synthesis and nucleotide excision repair

DNA tandem lesions are comprised of two contiguously damaged nucleotides. This subset of clustered lesions is produced by a variety of oxidizing agents, including ionizing radiation. Clustered lesions can inhibit base excision repair (BER). We report the effects of tandem lesions composed of a thymine glycol and a 5'-adjacent 2-deoxyribonolactone (LTg) or tetrahydrofuran abasic site (FTg). Some BER enzymes that act on the respective isolated lesions do not accept the tandem lesion as a substrate. For instance, endonuclease III (Nth) does not excise thymine glycol (Tg) when it is part of either tandem lesion. Similarly, endonuclease IV (Nfo) does not incise L or F when they are in tandem with Tg. Long-patch BER overcomes inhibition by the tandem lesion. DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta) carries out strand displacement synthesis, following APE1 incision of the abasic site. Pol beta activity is enhanced by flap endonuclease (FEN1), which cleaves the resulting flap. The tandem lesion is also incised by the bacterial nucleotide excision repair system UvrABC with almost the same efficiency as an isolated Tg. These data reveal two solutions that DNA repair systems can use to counteract the formation of tandem lesions.     

Human 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase: effect of sequence context on excision, association with PCNA, and stimulation by AP endonuclease

Human 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase (MPG protein) is involved in the base excision repair (BER) pathway responsible mainly for the repair of small DNA base modifications. It initiates BER by recognizing DNA adducts and cleaving the glycosylic bond leaving an abasic site. Here, we explore several of the factors that could influence excision of adducts recognized by MPG, including sequence context, effect of APE1, and interaction with other proteins. To investigate sequence context, we used 13 different 25 bp oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing a unique hypoxanthine residue (Hx) and show that the steady-state specificity of Hx excision by MPG varied by 17-fold. If APE1 protein is used in the reaction for Hx removal by MPG, the steady-state kinetic parameters increase by between fivefold and 27-fold, depending on the oligodeoxyribonucleotide. Since MPG has a role in removing adducts such as 3-methyladenine that block DNA synthesis and there is a potential sequence for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) interaction, we hypothesized that MPG protein could interact with PCNA, a protein involved in repair and replication. We demonstrate that PCNA associates with MPG using immunoprecipitation with either purified proteins or whole cell extracts. Moreover, PCNA binds to both APE1 and MPG at different sites, and loading PCNA onto a nicked, closed circular substrate with a unique Hx residue enhances MPG catalyzed excision. These data are consistent with an interaction that facilitates repair by MPG or APE1 by association with PCNA. Thus, PCNA could have a role in short-patch BER as well as in long-patch BER. Overall, the data reported here show how multiple factors contribute to the activity of MPG in cells.     

Human base excision repair enzymes apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease1 (APE1), DNA polymerase beta and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1: interplay between strand-displacement DNA synthesis and proofreading exonuclease activity

We examined interactions between base excision repair (BER) DNA intermediates and purified human BER enzymes, DNA polymerase β (pol β), apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (APE1) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1). Studies under steady-state conditions with purified BER enzymes and BER substrates have already demonstrated interplay between these BER enzymes that is sensitive to the respective concentrations of each enzyme. Therefore, in this study, using conditions of enzyme excess over substrate DNA, we further examine the question of interplay between BER enzymes on BER intermediates. The results reveal several important differences compared with data obtained using steady-state assays. Excess PARP-1 antagonizes the action of pol β, producing a complete block of long patch BER strand-displacement DNA synthesis. Surprisingly, an excess of APE1 stimulates strand-displacement DNA synthesis by pol β, but this effect is blocked by PARP-1. The APE1 exonuclease function appears to be modulated by the other BER proteins. Excess APE1 over pol β may allow APE1 to perform both exonuclease function and stimulation of strand-displacement DNA synthesis by pol β. This enables pol β to mediate long patch sub-pathway. These results indicate that differences in the stoichiometry of BER enzymes may regulate BER.