Regulation of the LPA2 receptor signaling through the carboxyl-terminal tail-mediated protein-protein interactions

While it is well known that lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) mediates diverse physiological and pathophysiological responses through the activation of G protein-coupled LPA receptors, the specificity and molecular mechanisms by which different LPA receptors mediate these biological responses remain largely unknown. Recent identification of several PDZ proteins and zinc finger proteins that interact with the carboxyl-terminal tail of the LPA(2) receptor provides a considerable progress towards the understanding of the mechanisms how the LPA(2) receptor specifically mediates LPA signaling pathways. These findings have led to the proposal that there are at least two distinct protein interaction motifs present in the carboxyl-terminus of the LPA(2) receptor. Together, these data provide a new concept that the efficiency and specificity of the LPA(2) receptor-mediated signal transduction can be achieved through the cross-regulation between the classical G protein-activated signaling cascades and the interacting partner-mediated signaling pathways.     

Sensitization of adenylate cyclase: a general mechanism of neuroadaptation to persistent activation of Galpha(i/o)-coupled receptors?

Acute activation of Galphas-coupled receptors stimulates cyclic AMP accumulation leading to the activation of downstream signaling cascades. These Galphas-mediated events can be countered by acute activation of inhibitory G proteins (Galpha(i/o)), which inhibit the activity of adenylate cyclase, thereby attenuating cyclic AMP accumulation. Furthermore, an additional, less direct mechanism for Galpha(i/o) proteins modulation of cyclic AMP signaling also has been described. Persistent activation of several Galpha(i/o)-coupled receptors has been shown to result in a subsequent paradoxical enhancement of adenylate cyclase activity in response to drug-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation. This sensitization of adenylate cyclase likely represents a cellular adaptive response following prolonged activation of inhibitory receptors. Recent advances in our knowledge of G protein signaling, adenylate cyclase regulation, and other cellular signaling mechanisms have extensively increased our insight into this phenomenon. It is now thought that sensitization occurs as part of a compensatory mechanism by which the cell adapts to chronic inhibitory input. Such a mechanism may be involved in modulating Galphas-coupled receptor signaling following neurotransmitter elevations that occur in psychiatric disease states or following the administration of many drugs of abuse. This review will focus on recent advances in the understanding of molecular signaling pathways that are involved in sensitization and describe the potential role of sensitization in neuronal cell function.     

Structural Insights into the Unique Modes of Relaxin-Binding and Tethered-Agonist Mediated Activation of RXFP1 and RXFP2

Our poor understanding of the mechanism by which the peptide-hormone H2 relaxin activates its G protein coupled receptor, RXFP1 and the related receptor RXFP2, has hindered progress in its therapeutic development. Both receptors possess large ectodomains, which bind H2 relaxin, and contain an N-terminal LDLa module that is essential for receptor signaling and postulated to be a tethered agonist. Here, we show that a conserved motif (GDxxGWxxxF), C-terminal to the LDLa module, is critical for receptor activity. Importantly, this motif adopts different structures in RXFP1 and RXFP2, suggesting distinct activation mechanisms. For RXFP1, the motif is flexible, weakly associates with the LDLa module, and requires H2 relaxin binding to stabilize an active conformation. Conversely, the GDxxGWxxxF motif in RXFP2 is more closely associated with the LDLa module, forming an essential binding interface for H2 relaxin. These differences in the activation mechanism will aid drug development targeting these receptors.     

Receptor tyrosine kinase activation: From the ligand perspective

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are single-span transmembrane receptors in which relatively conserved intracellular kinase domains are coupled to divergent extracellular modules. The extracellular domains initiate receptor signaling upon binding to either soluble or membrane-embedded ligands. The diversity of extracellular domain structures allows for coupling of many unique signaling inputs to intracellular tyrosine phosphorylation. The combinatorial power of this receptor system is further increased by the fact that multiple ligands can typically interact with the same receptor. Such ligands often act as biased agonists and initiate distinct signaling responses via activation of the same receptor. Mechanisms behind such biased agonism are largely unknown for RTKs, especially at the level of receptor–ligand complex structure. Using recent progress in understanding the structures of active RTK signaling units, we discuss selected mechanisms by which ligands couple receptor activation to distinct signaling outputs.     

Recent advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating platelet integrin αIIbβ3 activation

Integrins are allosteric cell adhesion receptors that cycle from a low to a high affinity ligand binding state, a complex process of receptor activation that is of particular importance in blood cells such as platelets or leukocytes. Here we highlight recent progress in the understanding of the molecular pathways that regulate integrin activation in platelets and leukocytes, with a special focus on the structural changes in platelet integrin αIIbβ3 brought about by key intracellular proteins, namely talin and kindlins, that are of crucial importance in the regulation of integrin function. Evidence that the small GTPase Rap1 and its guanine exchange factor CalDAG-GEF1, together with RIAM, a Rap1GTP adaptor protein, promote the interaction of talin with the integrin β subunit, has greatly contributed to fill the gap in our understanding of the signaling pathway from G-coupled agonist receptors and their phospholipase C-dependant second messengers, to integrin activation. Studies of patients with the rare blood cell disorder LAD-III have contributed to the identification of kindlins as new co-regulators of the talin-dependent integrin activation process in platelets and leukocytes, underlining the relevance for the in-depth investigation of patients with rare genetic blood cell disorders.     

Endocytosis and signaling

Many cellular signaling processes are governed by endocytosis through the internalization of plasma membrane receptors. This receptor clearance defines the quality with which a cell can react to extracellular stimuli. However, growing evidence indicates that endocytosis also enables the formation of endosome-specific signal transduction complexes. Their activity is controlled by the balanced trafficking of receptors and signaling molecules through the endocytic compartments. These are commonly divided into early endosomes, recycling endosomes, and late endosomes. Recent progress has been made in the understanding of the biogenesis of these organelles, highlighting their dynamic interconversion, maturation and also the generation of heterogenous subdomains on their surface. These multifunctional compartments represent the physical basis for the assembly and turnover of signaling complexes, which in turn themselves can define specialized endosomal-signaling platforms.     

Garlic (Allium sativum) extract inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced Toll-like receptor 4 dimerization

Garlic has long been used as a folk medicine. Numerous studies have demonstrated that a garlic extract and its sulfur-containing compounds inhibited nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) activation induced by various receptor agonists including lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a key role in sensing diverse microbial products and inducing innate immune responses. The dimerization of TLR4 is required for the activation of downstream signaling pathways, including NF-kappaB. Therefore, TLR4 dimerization may be one of the first lines of regulation in activating LPS-induced signaling pathways. We report here biochemical evidence that the ethyl acetate fraction of garlic inhibited the LPS-induced dimerization of TLR4, resulting in the inhibition of NF-kappaB activation and the expression of cyclooxygenase 2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase. Our results demonstrate for the first time that a garlic extract can directly inhibit the TLRs-mediated signaling pathway at the receptor level. These results shed a new insight into understanding how garlic modulates the immune responses that could modify the risk of many chronic diseases.     

Proteomic Response of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells to Histamine Stimulation

The histamine receptors (HRs) represent a subclass of G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) and comprise four subtypes. Due to their numerous physiological and pathological effects, HRs are popular drug targets for the treatment of allergic reactions or the regulation of gastric acid secretion. Hence, an understanding of the functional selectivity of HR ligands has gained importance. These ligands can bind to specific GPCRs and selectively activate defined pathways. Supporting the activation of a therapeutically necessary pathway without the activation of other signaling cascades can result in drugs with more specific activity and fewer side effects. To evaluate the cellular consequences resulting from receptor binding, comprehensive analyses of cellular protein alterations upon incubation with ligands are required. For this purpose, endothelial cells are treated with histamine, as the endogenous ligand of HRs, to obtain a global overview of its cellular effects. Quantitative proteomics and pathway analyses of histamine‐treated and untreated cells reveal enrichment of the nuclear factor‐κB and tumor necrosis factor signaling pathways, cytokine?cytokine receptor interactions, complement and coagulation cascades, and acute inflammatory processes upon histamine treatment. This strategy offers the opportunity to monitor HR‐mediated signaling in a multidimensional manner.     

Structures of integrin domains and concerted conformational changes in the bidirectional signaling mechanism of alphaIIbbeta3

Integrins are heterodimeric type I transmembrane cell-adhesive receptors whose affinity for ligands is regulated by tertiary and quaternary conformational changes that are transmitted from the cytoplasmic tails to the extracellular ectodomains during the transition from the inactive to the active state. Receptor occupancy initiates further structural alterations that transduce signals across the plasma membrane and result in receptor clustering and recruitment of signaling molecules and cytoskeletal rearrangements at the integrin's cytoplasmic domains. The large distance between the intracellular cytoplasmic domains and the ligand-binding site, which in an extended conformation spans more that 200 A, imposes a complex mechanism of interdomain communication for the bidirectional information flow across the plasma membrane. Significant progress has recently been made in elucidating the crystal and electron microscopy structures of integrin ectodomains in its unliganded and liganded states, and the nuclear magnetic resonance solution structures of stalk domains and the cytoplasmic tails. These structures revealed the location of sites that are functionally important and provided the basis for defining new models of integrin activation and signaling through bidirectional conformational changes, and for understanding the structural basis of the cation-dependent ligand-binding specificity of integrins. Platelet integrin alphaIIbbeta3 has served as a paradigm for many aspects of the structure and function of integrins The aim of this minireview is to combine recent structural and biochemical studies on integrin receptors that converge into a model of the tertiary and quaternary conformational changes in alphaIIbbeta3 and other homologous integrins that propagate inside-out and outside-in signals.     

Blocking receptors on the inside: pepducin-based intervention of PAR signaling and thrombosis

Transmembrane signaling through G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) controls a remarkably diverse array of cellular processes including metabolism, growth, motility, adhesion, neuronal signaling, and blood coagulation. The large number of GPCRs and their important roles in normal physiology and in disease have made them the target for more than 50% of prescribed drugs. GPCR agonists and antagonists invariably act on the extracellular surface of the receptors, whereas the intracellular surface has not yet been exploited for development of new therapeutic agents. Here, we demonstrate the utility of novel cell-penetrating peptides, termed pepducins, that act as intracellular inhibitors and/or agonists of signal transference from receptor to G protein. The pepducins require the presence of their cognate receptor for activity and are highly selective for receptor type. Mutational analysis of both intact receptor and pepducins demonstrates that the cell-penetrating agonists do not activate G proteins by the same mechanism as the intact receptor i3 loop, but instead require the C-tail of the receptor. Attachment of a palmitate lipid to shorter i3 loop peptides derived from protease-activated receptors PAR1 and PAR4 created potent inhibitors of thrombin-mediated aggregation of human platelets. Infusion of the anti-PAR4 pepducin into mice extended bleeding time and protected against systemic platelet activation, consistent with the phenotype of a mouse with genetic deficiency of PAR4. These data show that pepducins may be used to ascertain the physiological roles of GPCRs and rapidly determine the potential therapeutic value of blockade of a particular signaling pathway.     

Tracking the opioid receptors on the way of desensitization

Opioid receptors belong to the super family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and are the targets of numerous opioid analgesic drugs. Prolonged use of these drugs results in a reduction of their effectiveness in pain relief also called tolerance, a phenomenon well known by physicians. Opioid receptor desensitization is thought to play a major role in tolerance and a lot of work has been dedicated to elucidate the molecular basis of desensitization. As described for most of GPCRs, opioid receptor desensitization involves their phosphorylation by kinases and their uncoupling from G-proteins realized by arrestins. More recently, opioid receptor trafficking was shown to contribute to desensitization. In this review, our knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of desensitization and recent progress on the role of opioid receptor internalization, recycling or degradation in desensitization will be reported. A better understanding of these regulatory mechanisms would be helpful to develop new analgesic drugs or new strategies for pain treatment by limiting opioid receptor desensitization and tolerance.     

The NMR solution structure of the relaxin (RXFP1) receptor lipoprotein receptor class A module and identification of key residues in the N-terminal region of the module that mediate receptor activation

The receptors for the peptide hormones relaxin and insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) are the leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptors LGR7 and LGR8 recently renamed as the relaxin family peptide (RXFP) receptors, RXFP1 and RXFP2, respectively. These receptors differ from other LGRs by the addition of an N-terminal low density lipoprotein receptor class A (LDLa) module and are the only human G-protein-coupled receptors to contain such a domain. Recently it was shown that the LDLa module of the RXFP1 and RXFP2 receptors is essential for ligand-stimulated cAMP signaling. The mechanism by which the LDLa module modulates receptor signaling is unknown; however, it represents a unique paradigm in understanding G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. Here we present the structure of the RXFP1 receptor LDLa module determined by solution NMR spectroscopy. The structure is similar to other LDLa modules but shows small differences in side chain orientations and inter-residue packing. Interchange of the module with the second ligand binding domain of the LDL receptor, LB2, results in a receptor that binds relaxin with full affinity but is unable to signal. Furthermore, we demonstrate via structural studies on mutated LDLa modules and functional studies on mutated full-length receptors that a hydrophobic surface within the N-terminal region of the module is essential for activation of RXFP1 receptor signal in response to relaxin stimulation. This study has highlighted the necessity to understand the structural effects of single amino acid mutations on the LDLa module to fully interpret the effects of these mutations on receptor activity.     

Understanding cytokine and growth factor receptor activation mechanisms

Our understanding of the detailed mechanism of action of cytokine and growth factor receptors – and particularly our quantitative understanding of the link between structure, mechanism and function – lags significantly behind our knowledge of comparable functional protein classes such as enzymes, G protein-coupled receptors, and ion channels. In particular, it remains controversial whether such receptors are activated by a mechanism of ligand-induced oligomerization, versus a mechanism in which the ligand binds to a pre-associated receptor dimer or oligomer that becomes activated through subsequent conformational rearrangement. A major limitation to progress has been the relative paucity of methods for performing quantitative mechanistic experiments on unmodified receptors expressed at endogenous levels on live cells. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge on the activation mechanisms of cytokine and growth factor receptors, critically evaluate the evidence for and against the different proposed mechanisms, and highlight other key questions that remain unanswered. New approaches and techniques have led to rapid recent progress in this area, and the field is poised for major advances in the coming years which promise to revolutionize our understanding of this large and biologically and medically important class of receptors.     

Systems biology of death receptor networks: live and let die

The extrinsic apoptotic pathway is initiated by death receptor activation. Death receptor activation leads to the formation of death receptor signaling platforms, resulting in the demolition of the cell. Despite the fact that death receptor-mediated apoptosis has been studied to a high level of detail, its quantitative regulation until recently has been poorly understood. This situation has dramatically changed in the last years. Creation of mathematical models of death receptor signaling led to an enormous progress in the quantitative understanding of the network regulation and provided fascinating insights into the mechanisms of apoptosis control. In the following sections, the models of the death receptor signaling and their biological implications will be addressed. Central attention will be given to the models of CD95/Fas/APO-1, an exemplified member of the death receptor signaling pathways. The CD95 death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) and regulation of CD95 DISC activity by its key inhibitor c-FLIP, have been vigorously investigated by modeling approaches, and therefore will be the major topic here. Furthermore, the non-linear dynamics of the DISC, positive feedback loops and bistability as well as stoichiometric switches in extrinsic apoptosis will be discussed. Collectively, this review gives a comprehensive view how the mathematical modeling supported by quantitative experimental approaches has provided a new understanding of the death receptor signaling network.     

Progress toward advanced understanding of metabotropic glutamate receptors: structure,signaling and therapeutic indications

The metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors are a group of Class C seven-transmembrane spanning/G protein-coupled receptors (7TMRs/GPCRs). These receptors are activated by glutamate, one of the standard amino acids and the major excitatory neurotransmitter. By activating G protein-dependent and non-G protein-dependent signaling pathways, mGlus modulate glutamatergic transmission both in the periphery and throughout the central nervous system. Since the discovery of the first mGlu receptor, and especially during the last decade, a great deal of progress has been made in understanding the signaling, structure, pharmacological manipulation and therapeutic indications of the 8 mGlu members.     

PDGF receptors-mediators of autocrine tumor growth and regulators of tumor vasculature and stroma

PDGFs and their cognate tyrosine kinase alpha- and beta-receptors are involved in multiple tumor-associated processes including autocrine growth stimulation of tumor cells, stimulation of tumor angiogenesis and recruitment and regulation of tumor fibroblasts. The recent development of clinically useful PDGF antagonists, like STI571/Glivec, has increased the interest in PDGF receptors as cancer drug targets. Autocrine PDGF receptor signaling occurs in certain malignancies characterized by mutational activation of PDGF or PDGF receptors, for instance, dermatofibrosaracoma protuberans, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and hypereosinophilic syndrome. The roles of PDGF in regulation of tumor angiogenesis and tumor fibroblasts are more general, and probably occur in most common solid tumors. Concerning tumor angiogenesis recent studies have predominantly focused on the importance of PDGF receptor signaling for tumor pericyte recruitment. PDGF receptors in the tumor stroma have also attracted attention as interesting drug targets because of their function as regulators of tumor interstitial fluid pressure, tumor transvascular transport and tumor drug uptake. In summary, the improved understanding of the role of PDGF signaling in tumor biology, and the introduction of PDGF antagonists, has set the stage for a continued development of PDGF antagonists as novel cancer drugs.     

Structural biology of G protein‐coupled receptor signaling complexes

G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of cell surface receptors that mediate numerous cell signaling pathways, and are targets of more than one‐third of clinical drugs. Thanks to the advancement of novel structural biology technologies, high‐resolution structures of GPCRs in complex with their signaling transducers, including G‐protein and arrestin, have been determined. These 3D complex structures have significantly improved our understanding of the molecular mechanism of GPCR signaling and provided a structural basis for signaling‐biased drug discovery targeting GPCRs. Here we summarize structural studies of GPCR signaling complexes with G protein and arrestin using rhodopsin as a model system, and highlight the key features of GPCR conformational states in biased signaling including the sequence motifs of receptor TM6 that determine selective coupling of G proteins, and the phosphorylation codes of GPCRs for arrestin recruitment. We envision the future of GPCR structural biology not only to solve more high‐resolution complex structures but also to show stepwise GPCR signaling complex assembly and disassembly and dynamic process of GPCR signal transduction.     

Evaluation of rage isoforms, ligands, and signaling in the brain

Since the identification of the receptor for advanced glycosylation end products (RAGE) in 1992, there have been tremendous strides made in our understanding of the role RAGE receptors play in a variety of physiological and pathological processes. Despite such progress, several fundamental aspects of RAGE expression and RAGE function remain largely unanswered. In particular, while multiple forms of the RAGE receptor are known to exist, little is known with regards to how these different isoforms of the RAGE receptor work together to mediate RAGE signaling. For example, some forms of the RAGE receptor may promote deleterious feed-forward pathways, while others may serve to inhibit deleterious activation of the RAGE receptor. Additionally, important questions remain with regards to the intracellular domain of the full-length RAGE receptor, and the specifics surrounding how intracellular signaling pathways become activated via the RAGE family of receptors. The focus of this review is to address each of these important issues, as well as other key aspects of RAGE biology, and discuss how they are important for both our understanding of the physiological and pathological roles of RAGE signaling within the brain.     

New insights in plant immunity signaling activation

Plant disease resistance can be triggered by specific recognition of microbial effectors by plant nucleotide binding-leucine rich repeat (NB-LRR) receptors. Over the last few years, many efforts have greatly improved the understanding of effector and NB-LRR function, but have left a lot of questions as to how effector perception activates NB-LRR induction of defense signaling. This review describes exciting new findings showing similarities and differences in function of diverse plant NB-LRR proteins in terms of pathogen recognition and where and how resistance proteins are activated. Localization studies have shown that some NB-LRRs can activate signaling from the cytosol while others act in the nucleus. Also, the structural determination of two NB-LRR signaling domains demonstrated that receptor oligomerization is fundamental for the activation of resistance signaling.     

Functional selectivity, ligand-directed trafficking, conformation-specific agonism: what's in a name?

Research on the design of compounds to selectively affect specific subsets of signals downstream of receptors has burgeoned lately, and several reports discussed at Experimental Biology 2005 indicate progress is being made in the understanding of what makes a drug functionally selective. Different conformations adopted by receptors after associating with specific ligands can determine which intracellular signaling pathways get activated and which do not. The appeal of such specific compounds is enormous when one considers that many disease states might require the subtle manipulation of some (or even one) but not all downstream events stemming from specific receptor activation. Additionally, a better understanding of functional selectivity would likely improve the drug delivery process: if compounds are screened through several functional assays appropriately designed to look for compounds exhibiting a high degree of selectivity, then many potential lead compounds might not be as frequently overlooked.