The Lipid Composition and Physical Properties of the Yeast Vacuole Affect the Hemifusion–Fusion Transition

Yeast vacuole fusion requires the formation of SNARE bundles between membranes. Although the function of vacuolar SNAREs is controlled in part by regulatory lipids, the exact role of the membrane in regulating fusion remains unclear. Because SNAREs are membrane‐anchored and transmit the force required for fusion to the bilayer, we hypothesized that the lipid composition and curvature of the membrane aid in controlling fusion. Here, we examined the effect of altering membrane fluidity and curvature on the functionality of fusion‐incompetent SNARE mutants that are thought to generate insufficient force to trigger the hemifusion–fusion transition. The hemifusion–fusion transition was inhibited by disrupting the 3Q:1R stoichiometry of SNARE bundles with the mutant SNARE Vam7p^Q283R. Similarly, replacing the transmembrane domain of the syntaxin homolog Vam3p with a lipid anchor allowed hemifusion, but not content mixing. Hemifusion‐stalled reactions containing either of the SNARE mutants were stimulated to fuse with chlorpromazine, an amphipathic molecule that alters membrane fluidity and curvature. The activity of mutant SNAREs was also rescued by the overexpression of SNAREs, thus multiplying the force transferred to the membrane. Thus, we conclude that either increasing membrane fluidity, or multiplying SNARE‐generated energy restored the fusogenicity of mutant SNAREs that are stalled at hemifusion. We also found that regulatory lipids differentially modulated the complex formation of wild‐type SNAREs. Together, these data indicate that the physical properties and the lipid composition of the membrane affect the function of SNAREs in promoting the hemifusion–fusion transition.     

Synaptotagmin I and Ca(2+) promote half fusion more than full fusion in SNARE-mediated bilayer fusion

Synaptic membrane fusion, which is necessary for neurotransmitter release, may be mediated by SNAREs and regulated by synaptotagmin (Syt) and Ca(2+). Fusion of liposomes mediated by reconstituted SNAREs produces full fusion and hemifusion, a membrane structure in which outer leaflets are mixed but the inner leaflets remain intact. Here, using the liposome fusion assay, it is shown that Syt promoted both hemifusion and full fusion in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner. Syt.Ca(2+) increased hemifusion more than full fusion, modulating the ratio of hemifusion to full fusion. Unlike the case of neuronal SNAREs, stimulation of fusion by Syt.Ca(2+) was not seen for other SNAREs involved in trafficking in yeast, indicating that the Syt.Ca(2+) stimulation was SNARE-specific. We constructed hybrid SNAREs in which transmembrane domains were swapped between neuronal and yeast SNAREs. With these hybrid SNAREs, we demonstrated that the interaction between the SNARE motifs of neuronal proteins and Syt.Ca(2+) was required for the stimulation of fusion.     

A complete set of SNAREs in yeast

Trafficking of cargo molecules through the secretory pathway relies on packaging and delivery of membrane vesicles. These vesicles, laden with cargo, carry integral membrane proteins that can determine with which target membrane the vesicle might productively fuse. The membrane fusion process is highly conserved in all eukaryotes and the central components driving membrane fusion events involved in vesicle delivery to target membranes are a set of integral membrane proteins called SNAREs. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has served as an extremely useful model for characterizing components of membrane fusion through genetics, biochemistry and bioinformatics, and it is now likely that the complete set of SNAREs is at hand. Here, we present the details from the searches for SNAREs, summarize the domain structures of the complete set, review what is known about localization of SNAREs to discrete membranes, and highlight some of the surprises that have come from the search.     

Membrane fusion induced by neuronal SNAREs transits through hemifusion

Synaptic transmission requires the controlled release of neurotransmitter from synaptic vesicles by membrane fusion with the presynaptic plasma membrane. SNAREs are the core constituents of the protein machinery responsible for synaptic membrane fusion. The mechanism by which SNAREs drive membrane fusion is thought to involve a hemifusion intermediate, a condition in which the outer leaflets of two bilayers are combined and the inner leaflets remain intact; however, hemifusion has been observed only as an end point rather than as an intermediate. Here, we examined the kinetics of membrane fusion of liposomes mediated by recombinant neuronal SNAREs using fluorescence assays that monitor both total lipid mixing and inner leaflet mixing. Our results demonstrate that hemifusion is dominant at the early stage of the fusion reaction. Over time, hemifusion transitioned to complete fusion, showing that hemifusion is a true intermediate. We also show that hemifusion intermediates can be trapped, likely as unproductive outcomes, by modulating the surface concentration of the SNARE proteins.     

Revisiting the role of SNAREs in exocytosis and membrane fusion

For over a decade SNARE hypotheses have been proposed to explain the mechanism of membrane fusion, yet the field still lacks sufficient evidence to conclusively identify the minimal components of native fusion. Consequently, debate concerning the postulated role(s) of SNAREs in membrane fusion continues. The focus of this review is to revisit original literature with a current perspective. Our analysis begins with the earliest studies of clostridial toxins, leading to various cellular and molecular approaches that have been used to test for the roles of SNAREs in exocytosis. We place much emphasis on distinguishing between specific effects on membrane fusion and effects on other critical steps in exocytosis. Although many systems can be used to study exocytosis, few permit selective access to specific steps in the pathway, such as membrane fusion. Thus, while SNARE proteins are essential to the physiology of exocytosis, assay limitations often prevent definitive conclusions concerning the molecular mechanism of membrane fusion. In all, the SNAREs are more likely to function upstream as modulators or priming factors of fusion.     

The native membrane fusion machinery in cells.

Recombinant SNAREs have been demonstrated as the minimal membrane fusion machinery. The participation of additional proteins in the regulation of membrane fusion has been suggested. In this study we provide nanometer-resolution images of native NSF oligomers and SNARE complexes isolated from neurons and the pancreas. Our study reveals the presence of new coiled rod-like structures in association with the SNARE complex only in neuronal tissue. Neuronal SNAREs were found coiled and super-coiled with these structures. The existence of NSF as pentamers in its native state is also demonstrated. The extent of coiling and super-coiling of SNAREs may regulate the potency and efficacy of membrane fusion in cells.     

Docking of liposomes to planar surfaces mediated by trans-SNARE complexes

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) play a key role in membrane fusion in the secretory pathway. In vitro, SNAREs spontaneously assemble into helical SNARE complexes with the transmembrane domains at the C-terminal end. During fusion, SNAREs are thought to bridge the two membranes and assemble in a zipper-like fashion, pulling the membranes together and initiating fusion. However, it is not clear to what extent SNARE assembly contributes to membrane attachment and membrane fusion. Using the neuronal SNAREs synaptobrevin (VAMP), SNAP-25, and syntaxin as examples, we show here that liposomes containing synaptobrevin firmly attach to planar surfaces containing immobilized syntaxin. Attachment requires the formation of SNARE complexes because it is dependent on the presence of SNAP-25. Binding is competed for by soluble SNARE fragments, with noncognate SNAREs such as endobrevin (VAMP8), VAMP4, and VAMP7 (Ti-VAMP) being effective but less potent in some cases. Furthermore, although SNAP-23 is unable to substitute for SNAP-25 in the attachment assay, it forms complexes of comparable stability and is capable of substituting in liposome fusion assays. Vesicle attachment is initiated by SNARE assembly at the N-terminal end of the helix bundle. We conclude that SNAREs can indeed form stable trans-complexes that result in vesicle attachment if progression to fusion is prevented, further supporting the zipper model of SNARE function.     

Plasma membrane targeting of exocytic SNARE proteins

SNARE proteins play a central role in the process of intracellular membrane fusion. Indeed, the interaction of SNAREs present on two opposing membranes is generally believed to provide the driving force to initiate membrane fusion. Eukaryotic cells express a large number of SNARE isoforms, and the function of individual SNAREs is required for specific intracellular fusion events. Exocytosis, the fusion of secretory vesicles with the plasma membrane, employs the proteins syntaxin and SNAP-25 as plasma membrane SNAREs. As a result, exocytosis is dependent upon the targeting of these proteins to the plasma membrane; however, the mechanisms that underlie trafficking of exocytic syntaxin and SNAP-25 proteins to the cell surface are poorly understood. The intracellular trafficking itinerary of these proteins is particularly intriguing as syntaxins are tail-anchored (or Type IV) membrane proteins, whereas SNAP-25 is anchored to membranes via a central palmitoylated domain-there is no common consensus for the trafficking of such proteins within the cell. In this review, we discuss the plasma membrane targeting of these essential exocytic SNARE proteins.     

The machinery of vesicle fusion

The compartmentalization of eukaryotic cells is reliant on the fidelity of vesicle-mediated intracellular transport. Vesicles deliver their cargo via membrane fusion, a process requiring membrane tethers, Sec1/Munc18 (SM) proteins, and SNAREs. These components function in concert to ensure that membrane fusion is efficient and accurate, but the mechanisms underlying their cooperative action are still in many respects mysterious. In this brief review, we highlight recent progress toward a more integrative understanding of the vesicle fusion machinery. We focus particular attention on cryo-electron microscopy structures of intact multisubunit tethers in complex with SNAREs or SM proteins, as well as a structure of an SM protein bound to multiple SNAREs. The insights gained from this work emphasize the advantages of studying the fusion machinery intact and in context.     

Calcium drives fusion of SNARE-apposed bilayers

N-ethylmalemide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) has been proposed to play a critical role in the membrane fusion process. The SNARE complex was suggested to be the minimal fusion machinery. However, there is mounting evidence for a major role of calcium in membrane fusion. Hence, the role of calcium in SNARE-induced membrane fusion was the focus of this study. It revealed that recombinant v-SNARE and t-SNARE, reconstituted into separate liposomes, interact to bring lipid vesicles into close proximity, enabling calcium to drive fusion of opposing bilayers. Exposure to calcium triggered vesicle fusion at both, high potency and efficacy. The half-time for calcium-induced fusion of SNARE-reconstituted vesicles was determined to be approximately 10 s, which is two orders of magnitude faster than in its absence. Calcium acts downstream of SNAREs, since the presence of SNAREs in bilayers increases the potency of calcium-induced vesicle fusion, without significantly influencing its efficacy. Hence, this study suggests that in the physiological state in cells, both SNAREs and calcium operate as the minimal fusion machinery.     

Double-Transmembrane Domain of SNAREs Decelerates the Fusion by Increasing the Protein-Lipid Mismatch

SNARE is the essential mediator of membrane fusion that highly relies on the molecular structure of SNAREs. For instance, the protein syntaxin-1 involved in neuronal SNAREs, has a single transmembrane domain (sTMD) leading to fast fusion, while the syntaxin 17 has a V-shape double TMDs (dTMDs), taking part in the autophagosome maturation. However, it is not clear how the TMD structure influences the fusion process. Here, we demonstrate that the dTMDs significantly reduce fusion rate compared with the sTMD by using an in vitro reconstitution system. Through theoretical analysis, we reveal that the V-shape dTMDs can significantly increase protein-lipid mismatch, thereby raising the energy barrier of the fusion, and that increasing the number of SNAREs can reduce the energy barrier or protein-lipid mismatch. This study provides a physicochemical mechanistic understanding of SNARE-regulated membrane fusion.     

A new catch in the SNARE

Vesicle traffic underpins cell homeostasis, growth and development in plants. Traffic is facilitated by a superfamily of proteins known as SNAREs ( soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptors) that interact to draw vesicle and target membrane surfaces together for fusion of the bilayers. Several recent findings now indicate that plant SNAREs might not be limited to the conventional 'housekeeping' activities commonly attributed to vesicle trafficking. In the past five years, six different SNAREs have been implicated in stomatal movements, gravisensing and pathogen resistance. These proteins almost certainly do contribute to specific membrane fusion events but they are also essential for signal transduction and response. Some SNAREs can modulate the activity of non-SNARE proteins, notably ion channels. Other examples might reflect SNARE interactions with different scaffolding and structural components of the cell.     

What is the role of SNARE proteins in membrane fusion?

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor activating protein receptor (SNARE) proteins have been at the fore-front of research on biological membrane fusion for some time. The subcellular localization of SNAREs and their ability to form the so-called SNARE complex may be integral to determining the specificity of intracellular fusion (the SNARE hypothesis) and/or serving as the minimal fusion machinery. Both the SNARE hypothesis and the idea of the minimal fusion machinery have been challenged by a number of experimental observations in various model systems, suggesting that SNAREs may have other functions. Considering recent advances in the SNARE literature, it appears that SNAREs may actually function as part of a complex fusion "machine." Their role in the machinery could be any one or a combination of roles, including establishing tight membrane contact, formation of a scaffolding on which to build the machine, binding of lipid surfaces, and many others. It is also possible that complexations other than the classic SNARE complex participate in membrane fusion.     

SNAREs in opposing bilayers interact in a circular array to form conducting pores

The process of fusion at the nerve terminal is mediated via a specialized set of proteins in the synaptic vesicles and the presynaptic membrane. Three soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF)-attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) have been implicated in membrane fusion. The structure and arrangement of these SNAREs associated with lipid bilayers were examined using atomic force microscopy. A bilayer electrophysiological setup allowed for measurements of membrane conductance and capacitance. Here we demonstrate that the interaction of these proteins to form a fusion pore is dependent on the presence of t-SNAREs and v-SNARE in opposing bilayers. Addition of purified recombinant v-SNARE to a t-SNARE-reconstituted lipid membrane increased only the size of the globular t-SNARE oligomer without influencing the electrical properties of the membrane. However when t-SNARE vesicles were added to a v-SNARE membrane, SNAREs assembles in a ring pattern and a stepwise increase in capacitance, and increase in conductance were observed. Thus, t- and v-SNAREs are required to reside in opposing bilayers to allow appropriate t-/v-SNARE interactions leading to membrane fusion.     

Sec22 and Memb11 are v-SNAREs of the anterograde endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi pathway in tobacco leaf epidermal cells

Distinct sets of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) are distributed to specific intracellular compartments and catalyze membrane fusion events. Although the central role of these proteins in membrane fusion is established in nonplant systems, little is known about their role in the early secretory pathway of plant cells. Analysis of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genome reveals 54 genes encoding SNARE proteins, some of which are expected to be key regulators of membrane trafficking between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi. To gain insights on the role of SNAREs of the early secretory pathway in plant cells, we have cloned the Arabidopsis v-SNAREs Sec22, Memb11, Bet11, and the t-SNARE Sed5, and analyzed their distribution in plant cells in vivo. By means of live cell imaging, we have determined that these SNAREs localize at the Golgi apparatus. In addition, Sec22 was also distributed at the ER. We have then focused on understanding the function of Sec22 and Memb11 in comparison to the other SNAREs. Overexpression of the v-SNAREs Sec22 and Memb11 but not of the other SNAREs induced collapse of Golgi membrane proteins into the ER, and the secretion of a soluble secretory marker was abrogated by all SNAREs. Our studies suggest that Sec22 and Memb11 are involved in anterograde protein trafficking at the ER-Golgi interface.     

Topological arrangement of the intracellular membrane fusion machinery

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) form a four-helix coiled-coil bundle that juxtaposes two bilayers and drives a basal level of membrane fusion. The Sec1/Munc18 (SM) protein binds to its cognate SNARE bundle and accelerates the basal fusion reaction. The question of how the topological arrangement of the SNARE helices affects the reactivity of the fusion proteins remains unanswered. Here we address the problem for the first time in a reconstituted system containing both SNAREs and SM proteins. We find that to be fusogenic a SNARE topology must support both basal fusion and SM stimulation. Certain topological combinations of exocytic SNAREs result in basal fusion but cannot support SM stimulation, whereas other topologies support SM stimulation without inducing basal fusion. It is striking that of all the possible topological combinations of exocytic SNARE helices, only one induces efficient fusion. Our results suggest that the intracellular membrane fusion complex is designed to fuse bilayers according to one genetically programmed topology.     

脑缺血后N-乙基马来酰亚胺敏感因子ATP酶失活致神经元自噬流障碍的病理机制

缺血性脑卒中是由脑血管梗塞引起的急性脑血管病,具有较高的发病率、致残率和致死率。研究发现,过度自噬或自噬不足均可导致细胞损伤。自噬包括自噬体的形成和成熟、自噬体与溶酶体融合、自噬底物在自噬溶酶体内的降解和清除,这些过程呈连续状态则称为自噬流。研究发现,脑缺血可导致自噬体与溶酶体间发生融合障碍,从而引发自噬流损伤。细胞内膜融合由3种核心组分介导,即N-乙基马来酰亚胺敏感因子（N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor,NSF） ATP酶、可溶性NSF黏附蛋白（soluble NSF attachment protein,SNAP）及可溶性NSF黏附蛋白受体（soluble NSF attachment protein receptors,SNAREs）。当SNAREs介导自噬体与溶酶体融合后以非活性的复合体形式存留于自噬溶酶体膜,须被NSF再激活为单体后方可发挥新一轮的膜融合介导作用,而NSF是唯一可再激活SNAREs的ATP酶。新近研究表明,脑缺血可显著抑制NSF ATP酶活性,导致其对SNAREs再激活减少,这可能是自噬体与溶酶体间发生融合障碍并导致神经元自噬...     

SNAREs and the secretory pathway-lessons from yeast

SNARE proteins lie at the heart of the membrane fusion events in the secretory and endocytic pathways. Physical interactions between them are thought not only to provide the driving force for bringing membranes together, but also to contribute to the specificity of vesicle targeting. Completion of the yeast genome sequence has allowed the full set of SNAREs to be identified. Characterization of these helps to define the number of distinct compartments and the nature of the transport steps between them, but also shows that SNAREs are by no means the sole determinants of fusion specificity. Evolutionary conservation of SNAREs suggests that despite the differences in scale and morphology, many features of membrane organization are similar in yeast and animal cells. This review summarizes current knowledge of the yeast SNAREs and the picture of the secretory pathway that emerges from such studies.     

SNARE regulators: matchmakers and matchbreakers

SNAREs (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptors) are membrane-associated proteins that participate in the fusion of internal membranes in eukaryotic cells. SNAREs comprise three distinct and well-conserved families of molecules that act directly as membrane fusogens or, at the least, as elements that bring membranes into close apposition and allow for subsequent fusion events to occur. While the molecular events leading to fusion are still under debate, it is clear that a number of additional factors are required to bring about SNARE-mediated membrane fusion in vivo. Many of these factors, which collectively can be called SNARE regulators (e.g. Sec1/Munc18, synaptotagmin, GATE-16, LMA1, Munc13/UNC-13, synaptophysin, tomosyn, Vsm1, etc.), bind directly to SNAREs and are involved in the regulation of SNARE assembly as well as the ability of SNAREs to participate in trafficking events. In addition, recent studies have suggested a role for posttranslational modification (e.g., phosphorylation) in the regulation of SNARE functions. In this review the possible role of SNARE regulators in SNARE assembly and the involvement of SNARE phosphorylation in the regulation of intracellular membrane trafficking will be discussed.     

NSF-fusion and beyond

NSF (N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein) was the first protein to be isolated as a crucial factor in intracellular membrane-fusion events, such as the fusion of synaptic vesicles with the presynaptic membrane during neurotransmission. Although the activation of membrane SNARE proteins for subsequent fusion is clearly a primary role of NSF, recent studies have provided surprising evidence that NSF also interacts with glutamate receptors at the postsynaptic membrane in a way that does not seem to involve SNAREs. These results suggest that NSF might act as a molecular chaperone not only on SNAREs but also on other proteins.