Evidence for the derivation of the Drosophila fushi tarazu gene from a Hox gene orthologous to lophotrochozoan Lox5

The DNA-binding homeobox motif was first identified in several Drosophila homeotic genes but also in fushi tarazu, a gene found in the Hox cluster yet involved in segmentation, not anteroposterior patterning [1]. Homeotic transformations are not seen in insect ftz mutants, and insect ftz genes do not have Hox-like expression except within the nervous system [2] [3]. Insect ftz homeobox sequences link them to the Antp-class genes and Tribolium and Schistocerca orthologs have Antp-class YPWM motifs amino-terminal to the homeobox [2] [3]. Orthologs of ftz cloned from a centipede and an onychophoran [4] show that it predates the emergence of the arthropods, but the inability to pinpoint non-arthropodan orthologs suggested that ftz is the product of a Hox gene duplication in the arthropod ancestor [4] [5]. I have cloned ftz orthologs from a mite and a tardigrade, arthropod outgroups of the insects [6]. Mite ftz is expressed in a Hox-like pattern, confirming its ancestral role in anteroposterior patterning. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that arthropod ftz genes are orthologous to the Lox5 genes of lophotrochozoans (a group that includes molluscs) [7] and, possibly, with the Mab-5 genes of nematodes and Hox6 genes of deuterostomes and would therefore have been present in the triploblast ancestor.     

Regional expression of the rice KN1-type homeobox gene family during embryo, shoot, and flower development.

We report the isolation, sequence, and pattern of gene expression of members of the KNOTTED1 (KN1)-type class 1 homeobox gene family from rice. Phylogenetic analysis and mapping of the rice genome revealed that all of the rice homeobox genes that we have isolated have one or two direct homologs in maize. Of the homeobox genes that we tested, all exhibited expression in a restricted region of the embryo that defines the position at which the shoot apical meristem (SAM) would eventually develop, prior to visible organ formation. Several distinct spatial and temporal expression patterns were observed for the different genes in this region. After shoot formation, the expression patterns of these homeobox genes were variable in the region of the SAM. These results suggest that the rice KN1-type class 1 homeobox genes function cooperatively to establish the SAM before shoot formation and that after shoot formation, their functions differ.     

Spatially restricted patterns of expression of the homeobox-containing gene Hox 2.1. during mouse embryogenesis

The mouse Hox 2.1 gene contains a homeobox sequence and is therefore a candidate for a vertebrate gene involved in the control of embryonic patterning or positional specification. To investigate this possibility, we have used in situ hybridization to determine the pattern of Hox 2.1 expression during mouse embryogenesis. At 8.5 days post coitum, Hox 2.1 is expressed at a low level in the posterior neuroectoderm and mesoderm, and in the neuroectoderm of the presumptive hindbrain. At 12.5 days p.c., Hox 2.1 is expressed in an anteroposterior restricted domain extending from the hindbrain throughout the length of the spinal cord, predominantly in the dorsal region. Between 12.5 and 13.5 days p.c. the domain becomes localized to the occipital and cervical regions. We also detect Hox 2.1 RNA in the embryonic lung, stomach, mesonephros and metanephros, as well as in myenteric plexus, dorsal root ganglia and the nodose ganglion, and in mature granulocytes. The embryonic expression of Hox 2.1 in neural tissue is compared with that of Hox 3.1, which also shows anteroposterior restricted domains of gene expression. These patterns of expression are not clearly consistent with Hox 2.1 or Hox 3.1 having roles in segmental patterning. However, the data are consistent with these genes having regulatory roles in anteroposterior positional specification in the neuroectoderm and mesoderm, and suggest that Hox 2.1 may also have functions during organogenesis.     

LIM同源框基因家族与神经系统

同源框基因是指一类含有同源序列的基因,它编码的蛋白质作为转录调节因子调节细胞的发育和分化,控制基因的表达形式。ＬＩＭ同源框基因不仅含有同源框基因也含有编码ＬＩＭ结构域的保守序列。     

The development of three identified motor neurons in the larva of an ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi

The generation of distinct classes of motor neurons underlies the development of complex motile behavior in all animals and is well characterized in chordates. Recent molecular studies indicate that the ascidian larval central nervous system (CNS) exhibits anteroposterior regionalization similar to that seen in the vertebrate CNS. To extend the understanding about the diversity of motor neurons in the ascidian larva, we have identified the number, position, and projection of individual motor neurons in Halocynthia roretzi, using a green fluorescent protein under the control of a neuron-specific promoter. Three pairs of motor neurons, each with a distinct shape and innervation pattern, were identified along the anteroposterior axis of the neural tube: the anterior and posterior pairs extend their axons toward dorsal muscle cells, whereas the middle pair project their axons toward ventral muscle. Overexpression of a dominant-negative form of a potassium channel in these cells resulted in paralysis on the injected side, thus these cells must constitute the major population of motor neurons responsible for swimming behavior. Lim class homeobox genes have been known as candidate genes that determine subtypes of motor neurons. Therefore, the expression pattern of Hrlim, which is a Lim class homeobox gene, was examined in the motor neuron precursors. All three motor neurons expressed Hrlim at the tailbud stage, although each down-regulated Hrlim at a different time. Misexpression of Hrlim in the epidermal lineage led to ectopic expression of TuNa2, a putative voltage-gated channel gene normally expressed predominantly in the three pairs of motor neurons. Hrlim may control membrane excitability of motor neurons by regulating ion channel gene expression.     

Expression of a homologue of the fushi tarazu (ftz) gene in a cirripede crustacean

In Metazoa, Hox genes control the identity of the body parts along the anteroposterior axis. In addition to this homeotic function, these genes are characterized by two conserved features: They are clustered in the genome, and they contain a particular sequence, the homeobox, encoding a DNA-binding domain. Analysis of Hox homeobox sequences suggests that the Hox cluster emerged early in Metazoa and then underwent gene duplication events. In arthropods, the Hox cluster contains eight genes with a homeotic function and two other Hox-like genes, zerknullt (zen)/Hox3 and fushi tarazu (ftz). In insects, these two genes have lost their homeotic function but have acquired new functions in embryogenesis. In contrast, in chelicerates, these genes are expressed in a Hox-like pattern, which suggests that they have conserved their ancestral homeotic function. We describe here the characterization of Diva, the homologue of ftz in the cirripede crustacean Sacculina carcini. Diva is located in the Hox cluster, in the same position as the ftz genes of insects, and is not expressed in a Hox-like pattern. Instead, it is expressed exclusively in the central nervous system. Such a neurogenic expression of ftz has been also described in insects. This study, which provides the first information about the Hoxcluster in Crustacea, reveals that it may not be much smaller than the insect cluster. Study of the Diva expression pattern suggests that the arthropod ftz gene has lost its ancestral homeotic function after the divergence of the Crustacea/Hexapoda clade from other arthropod clades. In contrast, the function of ftz during neurogenesis is well conserved in insects and crustaceans.     

Homeobox Genes, Retinoic Acid and the Development and Evolution of Dual Body Plans in the Ascidian Herdmania curvata

Ascidians, along with other urochordates, are the most evolutionarydistant group from vertebrates to display definitive chordate-specificcharacters, such as a notochord, dorsal hollow nerve cord, pharynxand endostyle. Most solitary ascidians have a biphasic lifehistory that has partitioned the development of these charactersbetween a planktonic microscopic tadpole larva (notochord anddorsal nerve cord) and a larger sessile adult (pharynx and endostyle).Very little is known of the molecular axial patterning processesoperating during ascidian postlarval development. Two axialpatterning homeobox genes Otx and Cdx are expressed in a spatiallyrestricted manner along the ascidian anteroposterior axis duringembryogenesis and postlarval development (i.e., metamorphosis).Comparisons of these patterns with those of homologous cephalochordateand vertebrate genes suggest that the novel ascidian biphasicbody plan was not accompanied by a deployment of these genesinto new pathways but by a heterochronic shift in tissue-specificexpression. Studies examining the role of all-trans retinoicacid (RA) in axial patterning in chordates also contribute toour understanding of the role of homeobox genes in the developmentof larval and adult ascidian body plans. Our studies demonstratethat RA does not regulate axial patterning in the developingascidian larval neuroaxis in a manner homologous to that foundin vertebrates. Although RA may regulate the expression of someascidian homeobox genes, ectopic application of RA does notappear to alter the morphology of the larval CNS. However, treatmentwith similar or lower concentrations of RA, have a profoundeffect on postlarval development and the juvenile body plan.These changes are correlated to a dramatic reduction of Otxexpression. Through these RA-induced effects we infer that whileRA may regulate the expression of some homeobox genes duringembryogenesis it has a far more dramatic impact on postlarvaldevelopment where regulative processes predominate.     

Ghox 4.7: a chick homeobox gene expressed primarily in limb buds with limb-type differences in expression.

Homeobox genes play a key role in specifying the segmented body plan of Drosophila, and recent work suggests that at least several homeobox genes may play a regulatory role during vertebrate limb morphogenesis. We have used degenerate oligonucleotide primers from highly conserved domains in the homeobox motif to amplify homeobox gene segments from chick embryo limb bud cDNAs using the polymerase chain reaction. Expression of a large number of homeobox genes (at least 17) is detected using this approach. One of these genes contains a novel homeobox loosely related to the Drosophila Abdominal B class, and was further analyzed by determining its complete coding sequence and evaluating its expression during embryogenesis by in situ hybridization. Based on sequence and expression patterns, we have designated this gene as Ghox 4.7 and believe that it is the chick homologue of the murine Hox 4.7 gene (formerly Hox 5.6). Ghox 4.7 is expressed primarily in limb buds during development and shows a striking spatial restriction to the posterior zone of the limb bud, suggesting a role in specifying anterior-posterior pattern formation. In chick, this gene also displays differences in expression between wing and leg buds, raising the possibility that it may participate in specifying limb-type identity.     

Regionalization and segmentation of the leech

Regionalization and segmentation of the leech body plan have been examined by numerous approaches over the years. A wealth of knowledge has accumulated regarding the normally invariant cell lineages of the leech and the degree of developmental plasticity that is possible in each cell line in early development and in neurogenesis. Homologues of genes that control regionalization and segmentation in Drosophila have been cloned from the leech and the expression patterns reveal conserved features with those in Drosophila and other organisms. Possible developmental functions of the en-class proteins in spatial and temporal modes of segment formation are discussed in light of leech and Drosophila development. Annelida and Arthropoda cell lineages of engrailed-class gene expression are compared in leech blast cell clones and crustacean parasegments. In addition, future directions for molecular analysis of segmentation of the leech are summarized. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Homeobox genes in vertebrate evolution.

A wide range of anatomical features are shared by all vertebrates, but absent in our closest invertebrate relatives. The origin of vertebrate embryogenesis must have involved the evolution of new regulatory pathways to control the development of new features, but how did this occur? Mutations affecting regulatory genes, including those containing homeobox sequences, may have been important: for example, perhaps gene duplications allowed recruitment of genes to new roles. Here I ask whether comparative data on the genomic organization and expression patterns of homeobox genes support this hypothesis. I propose a model in which duplications of particular homeobox genes, followed by the acquisition of gene-specific secondary expression domains, allowed the evolution of the neural crest, extensive organogenesis and craniofacial morphogenesis. Specific details of the model are amenable to testing by extension of this comparative approach to molecular embryology.     

New electrical properties of neurons induced by a homeoprotein

To explore possible neurogenic functions of the genes of the Hox/HOM complexes, we injected the mRNA from the leech homeobox genes Lox1 and Lox4 into adult neurons that normally do not express them. The ectopic expression of Lox1 induced a specific transformation in the electrical properties of certain identified neurons: action potential amplitude increased about threefold after the injections. This effect of Lox1 expression was restricted, among cell types examined, to the anterior pagoda neurons (APs) and the nut neurons. This effect was also restricted to Lox1 ectopic expression; the action potentials of APs and nut neurons were not enlarged when the mRNAs of either Lox4, another leech Hox/HOM gene, or β-galactosidase were injected. Lox1 mRNA injection did not affect the resting potential, input resistance, or axonal morphology of the transformed APs, raising the possibility that it acts via the modification of voltage-dependent ion channels. Thus, a specific homeobox gene can transform key neuronal characteristics in a cell-specific manner. We may thus add electrophysiologic properties to other aspects of neuronal identity determined by homeobox gene expression. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Neurobiol 33: 11–17, 1997     

Bar homeobox genes are latitudinal prepattern genes in the developing Drosophila notum whose expression is regulated by the concerted functions of decapentaplegic and wingless

In Drosophila notum, the expression of achaete-scute proneural genes and bristle formation have been shown to be regulated by putative prepattern genes expressed longitudinally. Here, we show that two homeobox genes at the Bar locus (BarH1 and BarH2) may belong to a different class of prepattern genes expressed latitudinally, and suggest that the developing notum consists of checker-square-like subdomains, each governed by a different combination of prepattern genes. BarH1 and BarH2 are coexpressed in the anterior-most notal region and regulate the formation of microchaetae within the region of BarH1/BarH2 expression through activating achaete-scute. Presutural macrochaetae formation also requires Bar homeobox gene activity. Bar homeobox gene expression is restricted dorsally and posteriorly by Decapentaplegic signaling, while the ventral limit of the expression domain of Bar homeobox genes is determined by wingless whose expression is under the control of Decapentaplegic signaling.     

Nodal signaling patterns the organizer

Spemann's organizer plays an essential role in patterning the vertebrate embryo. During gastrulation, organizer cells involute and form the prechordal plate anteriorly and the notochord more posteriorly. The fate mapping and gene expression analyses in zebrafish presented in this study reveal that this anteroposterior polarity is already initiated in the organizer before gastrulation. Prechordal plate progenitors reside close to the blastoderm margin and express the homeobox gene goosecoid, whereas notochord precursors are located further from the margin and express the homeobox gene floating head. The nodal-related genes cyclops and squint are expressed at the blastoderm margin and are required for prechordal plate and notochord formation. We show that differential activation of the Nodal signaling pathway is essential in establishing anteroposterior pattern in the organizer. First, overexpression of cyclops and squint at different doses leads to the induction of floating head at low doses and the induction of both goosecoid and floating head at higher doses. Second, decreasing Nodal signaling using different concentrations of the antagonist Antivin inhibits goosecoid expression at low doses and blocks expression of both goosecoid and floating head at higher doses. Third, attenuation of Nodal signaling in zygotic mutants for the EGF-CFC gene one-eyed pinhead, an essential cofactor for Nodal signaling, leads to the loss of goosecoid expression and expansion of floating head expression in the organizer. Concomitantly, cells normally fated to become prechordal plate are transformed into notochord progenitors. Finally, activation of Nodal signaling at different times suggests that prechordal plate specification requires sustained Nodal signaling, whereas transient signaling is sufficient for notochord development. Together, these results indicate that differential Nodal signaling patterns the organizer before gastrulation, with the highest level of activity required for anterior fates and lower activity essential for posterior fates.